2018 RPMS IPCRF Teacher I II III MTs SY 2018 2019

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
Department of Education
National Capital Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE
Manila
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Rating Scale for Department Heads
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION:: NAME OF RATER:
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL: POSITION:
RATING PERIOD : April 2016 to March 2017 DATE OF REVIEW: April ___, 2017
Major Key Result Wt. Per Performance Indicators Rating Scale

Final Area Objectives KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Actual Results Ave.
E Q T Score
Outcomes (KRA) Rating
1. Ensured supervision of instruction
Monitoring and and provided technical 100% of teachers were supervised 100% of teachers were
MFO -2 Evaluation of assistance to teachers as and provided technical assistance E supervised and provided 5
Basic School evidenced by: with excellent performance technical assistance
Education Curriculum a. Supervisory Plan within the rating period.
Services and b. Form 178/STAR Observation 25% 5.000 1.250
Instruction tool Q Excellent 5
40% c. Pre and/or Post Conference
d. Anecdotal Report
e. Scheduled intravisitation T June to August 5
within the rating period.
2. Ensured the monitoring of 100% of the teachers were
learners' performance through monitoring the learners' performance E 5
the following: satisfying the following indicators:
a. Quarterly Exams a. Accuracy
b. Performance tasks results 10% b. Updated Q 5 5.000 0.500
c. Written work results c. Orderliness
at the end of every quarter d. Completeness
e. Compliant to DepEd Order No. 8 T 5
s. 2015
3. Ensured on time checking and
submission of the following: E 5
a. Lesson Plan' 100% of the indicators were checked
b. Teachers Attendance (F-48) 5% with no errors/revisions and submitted 5.000 0.250
Q 5
c. Assessment Tools on time
d. School Forms
T 5
e. Intervention Scheme
1. Intensified support and technical 100% of the teachers were provided
assistance to teachers through: with the following:
Human a. LAC Sessions a. LAC Sessions E 5
Resource b. Training/seminars in different b. Training/seminars in different
Development levels levels
20% c. SBIM/Monthly Professional c. SBIM/Monthly Professional
Meeting Meeting
d. Promotion 15% d. Promotion Q 5 5.000 0.750
e. Continuing education e. Continuing education
(Graduate Program and (Graduate Program and
short-term courses) short-term courses)
f. Scholarship programs f. Scholarship programs
g. Coaching and Mentoring g. Coaching and Mentoring T 5
program program
within the rating period within the rating period
E 5
2. Established development plan Prepared and submitted one
for teachers. comprehensive development
5% Q 5 5.000 0.250
plan for teachers to the school head
before the start of the school year.
T 5
1. Ensured utilization of learning 100% of the learning materials were

materials such as: 8% utilized such as:
School * Students Learning Materials * Students Learning Materials E 5
Resource * Teachers Guide * Teachers Guide
Management * Reference Materials * Reference Materials
15% *Instructional Materials *Instructional Materials
within the rating period. satisfying the following indicators: 5.000 0.400
Q 5
a. Adequate
a. Availability
b. Beneficial
c. Relevance
T 5
d. Updated
within the rating period
2. Ensured the utililization of the 100% of the learners and teachers
department facilities and supply utilized the department facilities and
E 5
materials within the rating period. supply materials satisfying the followi
7% 5.000 0.350
E 5
indicators:
a. Functional
7% 5.000 0.350
b. Sufficiency Q 5
c. Availability
d. Well-maintained
e. updated T 5
1. Strengthened participation in
seminars ,workshops, conferences 5 evidences were satisfied with
E 5
Professional and/or trainings within the school outstanding rating within the school
Growth and year (school, district, division, regional, year
Development national and/or international) as
15% evidenced by:
5% Q 5 5.000 0.250
a. Resource speakership/paper
presentation
b. Committee chairmanship
c. Facilitation
T 5
d. TWG membership
e. being a Trainer
Completed the program
2. Upgraded Professional Education Completed the Graduate Program with E MA/EdD/PhD 5
through the Graduate Program superior General Weighted Average
5% 5.000 0.250
Superior (GWA)
Q 1.0 - 1.25 5
96-100
3. Enhanced Professional Education
through any of the following: Completed at least 2 programs within
E 5
a. Short-term courses/tech-voc the rating period.
b. Special trainings 5% 5.000 0.250
c. Seminars (at least 10 days)
d. TESDA courses related to field T 5
of specialization
E 5
School-Based 1. Ensured participation in the Submitted SIP/AIP with no errors/
Management development of SIP/AIP within 5% revision within the given time. 5.000 0.250
Q 5
Plan the given time.
5% T 5
Special Tasks 1. Developed two of the following: 100% completion and implementation
and Other a. Action plan of two of the following:
Assignments b. Action Research a. Action plan
E 5
5% 5.000 0.250
5% c. Training matrix b. Action Research E 5
d. Assessment Tool c. Training matrix
e. Programs/Activities aligned to 5% d. Assessment Tool 5.000 0.250
SBM/SIP/AIP e. Programs/Activities aligned to
f. Other tasks in exigency of SBM/SIP/AIP
service f. Other tasks in exigency of
within the rating period service
Q 5
were attained with an outstanding
evaluation within the rating period.
FINAL RATING 5.000
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS ADJECTIVAL RATING OUTSTANDING
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor
Name of Principal Name of Head Teacher Name of ASDS In-Charge

Principal Head Teacher III/VI Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Rater Ratee Approving Authority
FINAL RATING 1.7500
ADJECTIVAL RATING OUTSTANDING
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
Below 1.499 Poor
Name of Principal Name of Department Head Name of ASDS In-Charge

Principal Department Head Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Manila
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Rating Scale for School Heads
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION:: NAME OF RATER:
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL: POSITION:
RATING PERIOD : April 2016 to March 2017 DATE OF REVIEW: April ___, 2017
Major Key Result Wt. Per Performance Indicators Rating Scale

Final Area Objectives KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Actual Results Ave.
E Q T
Outcomes (KRA) Rating
MFO -2 1. Intensified instructional supervision 100% of the teachers were supervised
Basic to improve learning outcomes with outstanding technical E 5
Education Instructional with outstanding technical assistance given at the end of
10% 5.000
Services Leadership assistance given at th end of the rating period. Q 5
35% the rating period.
T 5
2. Ensured learners' reading profi-
ciency to independent level 100% of the learners attained
(silent and oral) at the end of the independent level (silent and oral)
5% E/Q 5 5 5.000
School Year. at the end of the school year.
Elementary : Grade 3
Secondary : Grade 7
3. Attained learning 90-100% of the learners achieved
outcomes based on the learners' 80% proficiency at the end
5% E/Q 5 5 5.000
Grade Point Average at the end of the rating period.
of the rating period.
4. Improved access performance Increased enrolment by 5%
5
indicators at the end of the rating or more (5%)
10% E 5.000
period. Zero dropout rate (5%)
5
1. Ensured the learners with a 100% of the DepEd programs were
E 5
Learning child-friendly learning environment effectively implemented
Environment with zero complaint and prompt * child protection policy
20% action within the day. * zone of peace
* project SMILE
8% * drug awareness and anti-smoking Q 5 5.000
* inclusive education
* health and nutrition awareness
* feeding program
* Gender awareness Development
T 5
with zero complaint and prompt
action within the day
2. Installed sustainable implement- 100% of the existing facilities such as:
ation plan for the maintenance a. Ancillary Services
of the following: * Canteen/Feeding Room
a. Ancillary Services * Library E 5
* Canteen/Feeding Room * Clinic
* Library * Guidance
* Clinic * Property
* Guidance b. Water and Sanitation
* Property c. Building Structure
b. Water and Sanitation d. Disaster Preparedness
c. Building Structure 7% e. Safety and Security Q 5 5.000
d. Disaster Preparedness f. Materials Recovery Facility
e. Safety and Security g. ICT Room/Lab
f. Materials Recovery Facility was maintained and managed at
g. ICT Room/Lab all times with quality indicators such
as:
* well-maintained
* functional T 5
* accessible
* sufficient
* sustainable
3. Ensured provision of learning 100% of the learning materials were
materials such as: utilized such as:
* Students Learning Materials * Students Learning Materials E 5
* Teachers Guide * Teachers Guide
* Reference Materials * Reference Materials
* Instructional Materials * Instructional Materials
within the rating period 5% satisfying the following indicators: 5.000
* adequate
Q 5
*availability
*beneficial
T 5
5% 5.000
* relevance
T 5
* updated
1. Intensified support and technical 100% of the teaching and non-
assistance to teaching and non- teaching personnel was provided
Human teaching personnel through: with the following: E 5
Resource a. LAC sessions a. LAC sessions
Management b. Training/ seminars in different b. Training/ seminars in different
20% levels levels
c. SBIM/Monthly Professional Meeting c. SBIM/Monthly Professional Meeting
d. Promotion 15% d. Promotion Q 5 5.000
e. Continuing education e. Continuing education
(Graduate Program and Short- (Graduate Program and Short-
Term courses) Term courses)
f. Scholarship programs f. Scholarship programs
g. Coaching and Mentoring g. Coaching and Mentoring T 5
program program
within the rating period. within the rating period.
Prepared and submitted one
E 5
2. Established development plan comprehensive development
for teaching and non-teaching plan for teaching and non-teaching
5% Q 5 5.000
personnel personnel to te SDO before the start
of the school year.
T 5
1. Established at least 5 sustainable 100% of sustainable linkages /
Parents linkages/partnerships with other partnerships with other sectors, E 5
Involvement sectors, agencies, LGUs and NGOs agencies, LGUs and NGOs through
5% 5.000
and through Adopt a School Program Adopt a School Program Policies
Community Policies within a school year. was established with outstanding Q 5
Partnership rating within a school year.
10% 2. Intensified involvement of the
School Governing Council (SGC)
and General Parents-Teachers At least 5 major school activities
E 5
Association (GPTA) in at least 5 were participated by School Governing
major school activities Council (SGC) ang General Parents-
(i.e. Brigada Eskwela, Foundation Teachers Association (GPTA) with an
5% 5.000
Day, Early Registration, School oustanding rating at the end of the
Reading Camp, NAT Enrichment school year.
Classes , Graduation , and other
Q 5
year-end related activities and
Fund Raising Projects) at the end
5% 5.000
Q 5
of the school year.

1. Intensified school leadership,
School management, and operations Five school leadership, management,
Leadership, functions focusing on the following: and operations functions were
Management a. Maintained school data base intensified with outstanding E 5
and system such as LIS, EBEIS, etc. performance within the rating
Operations b. Implemented SIP, AIP, APP period at all times.
10% c. Engaged the stakeholders in
improving school facilities
10% 5.000
d. Ensured quality standards for
Q 5
equipment and facilities procured
or given to school
e. Conducted monitoring and
evaluation of all PPAs
with outstanding performance T 5
within the rating period at
all times.
E 5
1. Ensured submission of financial 100% of the financial reports were
reports on or before the scheduled submitted with no errors or
2% Q 5 5.000
date without error or revision on revisions on or before the scheduled
the scheduled date date.
T 5
1. Ensured school transparency

Fiscal and accountability mechanism 100% of the school transparency and
Management on the following: accountability mechanisms were
5% a. Allocation and prioritization ensured with no error or revisions
E 5
of funds for improvement and in the reports submitted before
maintenance the scheduled date.
b. Monitoring, accounting, and
reporting of utilized school funds
and other resources
c. Coordination with stakeholders
on mobilization 3% 5.000
Q 5
d. Submission of financial reports
on or before the scheduled date
without error or revision
e. School resources were utilized
in accordance with DepEd policies
and accounting and auditing
rules and regulations and other T 5
pertinent guidelines
submitted before the scheduled
date.
E 5
3% 5.000
1. Ensured implementation of at One leading innovation was
E 5
Leading least one leading innovation in all implemented using all aspects
Innovations aspects of school governance and 3% of school governance and leadership 5.000
5% leadership adapted/adopted by adapted/adopted by the Division
the Division within the school year. within the school year. Q 5
2. Ensured implementation of five Five or more very highly effective

E 5
or more very highly effective innovations were implemented in
2% 5.000
innovations in all aspects of school all aspects of school governance
governance and leadership within and leadership within the school
Q 5
the school year. year.
FINAL RATING 5.000

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS ADJECTIVAL RATING OUTSTANDING
Below 1.499 Poor
Name of ASDS In-Charge Name of Principal Name of SDS

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Principal Schools Division Superintandent
Rating Scale
Score
0.500
0.250
0.250
0.500
0.400
0.350
0.250
0.250
0.750
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.500
0.100
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.100
5.000
OUTSTANDING
Name of SDS
Schools Division Superintandent
Approving Authority
Manila
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Rating Scale for Master Teacher I, II (Secondary)
Name of Employee: LINDA H. DESAMERO
Position: Master Teacher I Name of Rater: GENE T. PANGILINAN
Department/School: TLE voc/Ramon Magsaysay High Schoo Position: Principal IV
Rating Period: June 4 to December 15, 2018 Date of Review: January 3, 2019
MFO's KRA's Objectives Timeline Weight QET Performance Indicators Actual Results
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactor Poor
Per
Satisfactory
KRA (5) (4) (3) y (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge of Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
content content content content
Knowledge
integration integration integration integration
Education content within and across
within and within and within and within and
evidence was
and across areas as across areas as across areas as across areas as
in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
Services Pedagogy curriculum teaching areas rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2 lessons least 1 lessons
using MOV 1 using MOV 1 using MOV 1 using MOV 1
evidence was
and supported and supported and supported and supported
by the other by the other by the other by the other
MOV MOV MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of teaching Quality Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated No acceptable
using diferent using diferent using diferent using diferent
teaching teaching teaching teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that enhance
promote promote promote promote
reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing evidence was
and/or and/or and/or and/or
learner achievement in numaracy skills numaracy skills numaracy skills numaracy skills
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
Education MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
literacy and numeracy skills rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown

evidence was
Services Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range of Quality Use different Use different Use different Use different No acceptable
teaching strategies to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
and creative and creative and creative and creative
develop critical and creative evidence was
thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
thinking, as well as other shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
Education 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
higher order thinking skills of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 shown

evidence was
Services Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
structure to engage management management management management
Environmen learners, individually or in and strategies and strategies and strategies and strategies
that engage that engage that engage that engage
groups, in meaningful
t and learners in learners in learners in learners in evidence was
exploration, discovery and
activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
Diversity of hands-on activities within as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
range of physical learning MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
Education Learners environment rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown
Education

evidence was
Services Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
management management management management
behavior constructively by strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of
learner learner learner learner
applying positive and non- behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
promote promote promote promote evidence was
violent discipline to ensure positive and positive and positive and positive and
non-violent as non-violent as non-violent as non-violent as
learning-focused shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
Education submitted with submitted with submitted with submitted with
environment a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4 shown

evidence was
Services Timeliness
Basic 6. Used differentiated, Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated
developmentally
appropriate learning strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
experience to address address learner address learner address learner address learner evidence was
diversisty as diversisty as diversisty as diversisty as
learners' gender, needs,
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
strengths, interests and 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
experiences. of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 shown

least 4 least 3 least 2 least 1
Education
strategies in at strategies in at strategies in at strategies in at
least 2 lessons least 2 lessons least 2 lessons least 2 lessons evidence was
as evidenced as evidenced as evidenced as evidenced
by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other MOV other MOV other MOV other MOV shown
Services
Services Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Planned, managed and Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
managed managed managed managed
implemented
developmentall developmentall developmentall developmentall
developmentally sequenced
Curriculum y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced
teaching and learning teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
evidence was
processes to meet learning learning learning learning
and curriculum requirements
process as process as process as process as
and varied teaching 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
Planning contexts. of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 shown

Education least 4 least 3 least 2 least 1
y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as evidence was
evidently evidently evidently evidently
1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and
Services Timeliness
Basic 8. Participated in collegial Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
participated in participated in participated in participated in
LACs/FGDs LACs/FGDs LACs/FGDs LACs/FGDs
/meetings to /meetings to /meetings to /meetings to
discussion that uses teacher discuss discuss discuss discuss
teacher/ teacher/ teacher/ teacher/
evidence was
feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
and learner feedback to
enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
Education
enrich teaching practice submiitted submiitted submiitted submiitted shown
Efficiency Participated in Participated in Participated in Participated in No acceptable

at least 4 at least 3 at least 2 at least 1
/meetings as /meetings as /meetings as /meetings as
evidence was
shown in any 1 shown in any 1 shown in any 1 shown in any 1
of the given of the given of the given of the given
Services Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, developed, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
used varied used varied used varied used varied
organized and used teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
resources, resources, resources, resources,
appropriate teaching and
including ICT, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT,
evidence was
to address to to address to to address to to address to
learning resources, address address address address
learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
including ICT, to address as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
learning goals. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown

resources resources resources resources
to address to address to address to address
learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals evidence was
as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidently
any 1 of any 1 of any 1 of any 1 of
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
Services Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, selected, Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable
selected, selected, selected, selected,
organized and organized and organized and organized and
organized and used used used used used
diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
Assessment formative and formative and formative and formative and
diagnostic, formative and summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment evidence was
strategied strategied strategied strategied
summative assessment
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
and
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
strategied consistent with requirements requirements requirements requirements
Education
Reporting curriculum requirements. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown
Services
Education
Efficiency Selected at Selected at Selected at Selected at No acceptable

least 4 varied least 3 varied least 2 varied least 1 varied
assessment assessment assessment assessment
tools as tools as tools as tools as
evidently evidently evidently evidently evidence was
of the of the of the of the
Services Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occassionally Rarely No acceptable
monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and
evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated
evaluated learner progress
progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement achievement achievement achievement evidence was
using learner using learner using learner using learner
and achievement using attainment attainment attainment attainment
data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
Education learner attainment data. submitted submitted submitted submitted shown
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable

combination of combination of combination of combination of
at least 4 of the at least 3 of the at least 2 of the at least 1 of the evidence was
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were were were were
evidence was
distributed distributed distributed distributed
Services across 4 across 3 across 2 across 1 shown
quarters quarters quarters quarters
Basic 12. Communicated promptly Quality Consistently Frequently Occassionally Rarely No acceptable
communicated communicated communicated communicated
promptly and promptly and promptly and promptly and
and clearly the learners clearly the clearly the clearly the clearly the
learners needs, learners needs, learners needs, learners needs,
needs, progress and progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
evidence was
key key key key
achievement to key stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
stakeholders, including
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
Education
parents/ guardians. submitted submitted submitted submitted shown
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable

Services
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were were were were
distributed distributed distributed distributed evidence was
across 4 across 3 across 2 across 1
Services quarters quarters quarters quarters shown
Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occassionally Rarely No acceptable
performed performed performed performed
various related various related various related various related
related works/ activities that works/ works/ works/ works/
activities that activities that activities that activities that evidence was
contribute to the teaching- contribute to contribute to contribute to contribute to
the teaching- the teaching- the teaching- the teaching-
Education Factor learning process. process as process as process as process as shown
Efficiency shown in the

Submitted a shown in the
Submitted a No acceptable
MOV submitted
combination of MOV submitted
combination of
Services Timeliness
Rating for Overall Accomplishments
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS EQUIVALENCES Descriptive Rating
Below 1.499 Poor
GENE T. PANGILINAN LINDA H. DESAMERO PEDRO M. ARAO

Principal IV Master Teacher I Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Manila
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Rating Scale for Teacher I, II, III (Secondary)
Name of Employee:
Position: Teacher I / II / III Name of Rater:
Department/School: TLE Position:
Rating Period: Date of Review:
MFO's KRA's Objectives Timeline Weight QET Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactor Poor
Per
Satisfactory
KRA (5) (4) (3) y (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge of Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable ###
knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
content content content content
Knowledge
integration integration integration integration
Education content within and across
within and within and within and within and
evidence was
and across areas as across areas as across areas as across areas as
in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
Services Pedagogy curriculum teaching areas rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable ###

evidence was
Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of teaching Quality Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated No acceptable ###
using diferent using diferent using diferent using diferent
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that enhance
promote promote promote promote
reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing evidence was
and/or and/or and/or and/or
learner achievement in numaracy skills numaracy skills numaracy skills numaracy skills
Education MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
literacy and numeracy skills rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown
Page 23
Services
Basic
Education

evidence was
Services Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range of Quality Use different Use different Use different Use different No acceptable ###
teaching strategies to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
and creative and creative and creative and creative
develop critical and creative evidence was
thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
thinking, as well as other shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
Education 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
higher order thinking skills of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 shown
evidence was
Services Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable ###
structure to engage management management management management
Environmen learners, individually or in and strategies and strategies and strategies and strategies
that engage that engage that engage that engage
groups, in meaningful
t and learners in learners in learners in learners in evidence was
exploration, discovery and
activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
Diversity of hands-on activities within as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
range of physical learning MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
Education Learners environment rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown

evidence was
Services Timeliness
Page 24
Basic 5. Managed learner Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable ###
management management management management
behavior constructively by strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of
applying positive and non- behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
promote promote promote promote evidence was
violent discipline to ensure positive and positive and positive and positive and
non-violent as non-violent as non-violent as non-violent as
learning-focused shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
Education submitted with submitted with submitted with submitted with
environment a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4 shown

evidence was
Services Timeliness
Basic 6. Used differentiated, Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable ###
developmentally
appropriate learning strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
experience to address address learner address learner address learner address learner evidence was
learners' gender, needs, diversisty as diversisty as diversisty as diversisty as
strengths, interests and 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
experiences. of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 shown

least 4 least 3 least 2 least 1
Education
strategies in at strategies in at strategies in at strategies in at
least 2 lessons least 2 lessons least 2 lessons least 2 lessons evidence was
as evidenced as evidenced as evidenced as evidenced
by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and
Services Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Planned, managed and Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable ###
managed managed managed managed
implemented
developmentally sequenced
Curriculum y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced
teaching and learning teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
evidence was
processes to meet learning learning learning learning
and curriculum requirements
process as process as process as process as
and varied teaching 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
Planning contexts. of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 shown
Education
Page 25
Basic

y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced
process as process as process as process as evidence was
Services Timeliness
Basic 8. Participated in collegial Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable ###
participated in participated in participated in participated in
/meetings to /meetings to /meetings to /meetings to
discussion that uses teacher discuss discuss discuss discuss
teacher/ teacher/ teacher/ teacher/
evidence was
feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
and learner feedback to
enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
Education
enrich teaching practice submiitted submiitted submiitted submiitted shown
Efficiency Participated in Participated in Participated in Participated in No acceptable ###

at least 4 at least 3 at least 2 at least 1
/meetings as /meetings as /meetings as /meetings as
evidence was
of the given of the given of the given of the given
Services Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, developed, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable ###
used varied used varied used varied used varied
organized and used teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
resources, resources, resources, resources,
appropriate teaching and
evidence was
to address to to address to to address to to address to
learning resources, address address address address
learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
including ICT, to address as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
learning goals. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown
Education
Page 26
resources resources resources resources
to address to address to address to address
learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals evidence was
as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidently
any 1 of any 1 of any 1 of any 1 of
Services Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, selected, Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable ###
selected, selected, selected, selected,
organized and organized and organized and organized and
organized and used used used used used
diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
Assessment formative and formative and formative and formative and
diagnostic, formative and summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment evidence was
strategied strategied strategied strategied
summative assessment
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
and
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
strategied consistent with requirements requirements requirements requirements
Education
Reporting curriculum requirements. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown
Efficiency Selected at Selected at Selected at Selected at No acceptable ###

least 4 varied least 3 varied least 2 varied least 1 varied
assessment assessment assessment assessment
tools as tools as tools as tools as
evidently evidently evidently evidently evidence was
of the of the of the of the
Services Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occassionally Rarely No acceptable ###
monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and
evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated
evaluated learner progress
progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement achievement achievement achievement evidence was
using learner using learner using learner using learner
and achievement using attainment attainment attainment attainment
data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
Education learner attainment data. submitted submitted submitted submitted shown
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable ###

Services Page 27
Education
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable ###
were were were were
evidence was
distributed distributed distributed distributed
Services across 4 across 3 across 2 across 1 shown
quarters
Consistently quarters
Frequently quarters
Occassionally quarters
Rarely No acceptable
Basic 12. Communicated promptly Quality ###
communicated communicated communicated communicated
promptly and promptly and promptly and promptly and
and clearly the learners clearly the clearly the clearly the clearly the
learners needs, learners needs, learners needs, learners needs,
needs, progress and progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
evidence was
key key key key
achievement to key stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
stakeholders, including
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
Education
parents/ guardians. submitted submitted submitted submitted shown
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable ###

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable ###
were were were were
distributed distributed distributed distributed evidence was
across 4 across 3 across 2 across 1
Services quarters quarters quarters quarters shown
Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occassionally Rarely No acceptable ###
performed performed performed performed
various related various related various related various related
related works/ activities that works/ works/ works/ works/
activities that activities that activities that activities that evidence was
contribute to the teaching- contribute to contribute to contribute to contribute to
the teaching- the teaching- the teaching- the teaching-
Education Factor learning process. process as process as process as process as shown
Efficiency shown in the
Submitted a No acceptable ###
MOV submitted
combination of
Services Timeliness
Rating for Overall Accomplishments
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS EQUIVALENCES Descriptive Rating
Below 1.499 Poor
Page 28
0 0
0 Teacher I / II / III Principal IV
Page 29
PUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
HOOLS DIVISION OFFICE
Manila
ANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

ale for Teacher I, II, III (Secondary)
Score
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Page 30
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Page 31
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Page 32
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Page 33
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Page 34
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Page 35
Manila
SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Rating Scale for Regular Teacher I, II, III (Secondary)
School Year 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL: TLE-VOC/RAMON MAGSAYSAY HIGH SCHOOL
RATING PERIOD : April 2016 - March 2017
No. Teaching-Learning Process Community Special

Name 30% Learners Outcomes 40% Involvement 5% Professional Growth 20% Task 5%
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 4 1 Total Descriptive
10% 10% 10% 20% 15% 5% 3% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 100% Rating
1 Napili, Hermin G. 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.800 0.600 0.200 0.120 0.100 0.250 0.050 0.200 0.250 0.250 4.320 Very Satisfactory
2 Tapang, Eloisa DC. 0.367 0.400 0.367 0.800 0.600 0.183 0.120 0.060 0.167 0.160 0.175 0.250 0.150 3.788 Very Satisfactory
Certified Correct:
PERLITO N. MALAYA
Officer-In-Charge
Manila

Rating Scale for Regular Teacher I, II, III (Secondary)
No. Teaching-Learning Process Community Special

Name 30% Learners Outcomes 40% Involvement 5% Professional Growth 20% Task 5%
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 4 1 Total Descriptive
10% 10% 10% 20% 15% 5% 3% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 100% Rating
1 Arao, Bonifacio S. 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.800 0.675 0.217 0.120 0.080 0.217 0.050 0.200 0.200 0.200 3.958 Very Satisfactory
2 Caringal, Jovelyn B. 0.367 0.367 0.433 0.800 0.600 0.217 0.120 0.093 0.250 0.050 0.175 0.217 0.250 3.938 Very Satisfactory
3 Cheung, Geraldine V. 0.433 0.367 0.500 0.800 0.750 0.183 0.120 0.080 0.200 0.050 0.150 0.150 0.217 4.000 Very Satisfactory
4 Cortez, Jaime R. 0.400 0.400 0.500 0.800 0.750 0.200 0.150 0.100 0.250 0.050 0.200 0.200 0.250 4.250 Very Satisfactory
5 De Leon, Monalie M. 0.467 0.500 0.400 0.800 0.750 0.250 0.140 0.087 0.200 0.150 0.200 0.200 0.200 4.343 Very Satisfactory
6 Garrote, Abigail Corazon E. 0.400 0.433 0.467 0.800 0.750 0.217 0.140 0.087 0.250 0.050 0.200 0.250 0.250 4.293 Very Satisfactory
7 Lozada, Marc Anthony P. 0.400 0.333 0.467 0.800 0.750 0.200 0.120 0.080 0.217 0.050 0.200 0.183 0.200 4.000 Very Satisfactory
8 Mateo, Aphril Boy P. 0.467 0.467 0.500 0.933 0.675 0.233 0.140 0.080 0.183 0.175 0.050 0.183 0.217 4.303 Very Satisfactory
9 Mora, Alexander M. 0.333 0.333 0.500 0.800 0.600 0.217 0.120 0.100 0.200 0.050 0.200 0.250 0.200 3.903 Very Satisfactory
10 Pallones, Leonie B. 0.500 0.467 0.467 0.867 0.750 0.217 0.140 0.087 0.233 0.150 0.200 0.217 0.200 4.493 Very Satisfactory
11 Palomares, Ludrico P. 0.400 0.367 0.400 0.867 0.750 0.217 0.110 0.080 0.217 0.100 0.200 0.150 0.183 4.040 Very Satisfactory
12 Tallo, Valentina C. 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.800 0.750 0.200 0.120 0.060 0.200 0.050 0.200 0.150 0.167 4.197 Very Satisfactory
13 Vergara, Niceas D. 0.500 0.300 0.500 0.800 0.750 0.200 0.120 0.080 0.200 0.050 0.175 0.150 0.250 4.075 Very Satisfactory
Certified Correct:
PERLITO N. MALAYA
Officer-In-Charge
factory
factory
actory
actory
actory
actory
actory
actory
actory
actory
actory
actory
actory
actory
actory
Manila

No. Special Task

Name Instructional Competence 50% Instrucional Supervision 25% Professional Growth 20% 5%
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Total
25% 20% 5% 10% 10% 5% 10% 5% 5% 5% 100% Descriptive Rating
1 Arellano, Jimmy G. 1.000 0.800 0.233 0.467 0.467 0.250 0.333 0.250 0.125 0.217 4.142 Very Satisfactory
2 De Torres, Virginia S. 1.083 0.800 0.233 0.367 0.400 0.200 0.400 0.225 0.200 0.250 4.158 Very Satisfactory
Certified Correct:
PERLITO N. MALAYA
Officer-In-Charge
Manila

Instructiona Professio
l Instrucional nal
No. Competenc Supervision Growth Special Task
Name e 50% 25% 20% 5% Total
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1
1 Desamero, Linda H. 1.167 0.933 0.117 0.467 0.400 0.250 0.500 0.200 0.200 0.233 4.467 Very Satisfactory
2 Ombao, Michael G. 1.083 0.867 0.050 0.467 0.433 0.217 0.467 0.175 0.200 0.250 4.208 Very Satisfactory
Certified Correct:
PERLITO N. MALAYA
Officer-In-Charge
Manila

Instructiona Professio
No. l Instrucional nal
Competenc Supervision Growth Special Task
Name e 50% 25% 20% 5% Total
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1
1 Ombao, Michael G. 1.083 0.867 0.050 0.467 0.433 0.217 0.467 0.175 0.200 0.250 4.208 Very Satisfactory
Certified Correct:
PERLITO N. MALAYA
Officer-In-Charge

2018 RPMS IPCRF Teacher I II III MTs SY 2018 2019

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

2018 RPMS IPCRF Teacher I II III MTs SY 2018 2019

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Major Key Result Wt. Per Performance Indicators Rating Scale

1. Ensured utilization of learning 100% of the learning materials were

Name of Principal Name of Head Teacher Name of ASDS In-Charge

Name of Principal Name of Department Head Name of ASDS In-Charge

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Major Key Result Wt. Per Performance Indicators Rating Scale

of the school year.

1. Ensured school transparency

2. Ensured implementation of five Five or more very highly effective

FINAL RATING 5.000

Name of ASDS In-Charge Name of Principal Name of SDS

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

Efficiency Participated in Participated in Participated in Participated in No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

Efficiency Selected at Selected at Selected at Selected at No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable

Efficiency shown in the

GENE T. PANGILINAN LINDA H. DESAMERO PEDRO M. ARAO

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable ###

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable ###

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable ###

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable ###

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable ###

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable ###

Efficiency Participated in Participated in Participated in Participated in No acceptable ###

Efficiency Selected at Selected at Selected at Selected at No acceptable ###

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable ###

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable ###

ANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

No. Teaching-Learning Process Community Special

SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

No. Teaching-Learning Process Community Special

SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

No. Special Task

SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Potrebbero piacerti anche