07/06/2019 427071582.

xls Chiller - Fix CAP+Stepless

Declared cooling capacity at full load DC = declared cooling capacity at temperatures A, B, C and D DC at rating points B, C and D shall
593.00 of the cooling demand (PR) -- CR < 1
i.e. Point A (DC, in kW)

Degradation Calculation
DC in kW EER at this DC Degradation Capacity Ratio
Cooling demand (PR) (measured or (measured or coefficient Cc CR EER at Part Load EER(PL)
EER (=DC(full load)*Partload) calculated) calculated) (=PR/DC) (=EER@full cap)*CR/(Cc*CR+(1-Cc))
EER A 2.41 593.00 593.00 2.41 - 1.00 2.41
EER B 3.05 553.47 620.00 3.05 0.90 0.89 3.01
EER C 3.66 513.93 660.00 3.66 0.90 0.78 3.56
EER D 4.24 474.40 710.00 4.24 0.90 0.67 4.04
Please consider: Selection of EERA, EERB, EERC, EERD depends on If Cc is not determined by test Ratio between cooling demand and declared capacity (CR=1, in
different ambient temp conditions, load profile and application then the default case of a continuous capacity adjustment)
temperature (HT, MT, LT) degradation coefficient
Cc shall be 0.9

cooling
j Tj (°C) hj part load % EERPL Ph*Tj PH*Tj/EERDC
demand
1 -19 0.1 80% 474.40 4.04 40 10
2 -18 0.4 80% 474.40 4.04 193 48
3 -17 0.6 80% 474.40 4.04 307 76
4 -16 1.1 80% 474.40 4.04 500 124
5 -15 1.7 80% 474.40 4.04 826 204
6 -14 3.0 80% 474.40 4.04 1,413 350
7 -13 3.8 80% 474.40 4.04 1,799 445
8 -12 5.7 80% 474.40 4.04 2,697 668
9 -11 8.9 80% 474.40 4.04 4,240 1,050
10 -10 11.8 80% 474.40 4.04 5,603 1,387
11 -9 17.3 80% 474.40 4.04 8,201 2,030
12 -8 20.0 80% 474.40 4.04 9,497 2,351
13 -7 28.7 80% 474.40 4.04 13,630 3,374
14 -6 39.7 80% 474.40 4.04 18,837 4,663
15 -5 56.6 80% 474.40 4.04 26,857 6,649
16 -4 76.4 80% 474.40 4.04 36,226 8,968
17 -3 106.1 80% 474.40 4.04 50,317 12,457
18 -2 153.2 80% 474.40 4.04 72,689 17,995

19 -1 203.4 80% 474.40 4.04 96,499 23,890

20 0 248.0 80% 474.40 4.04 117,639 29,123
21 1 282.0 80% 474.40 4.04 133,784 33,120

22 2 275.9 80% 474.40 4.04 130,893 32,404

23 3 300.6 80% 474.40 4.04 142,610 35,305

24 4 310.8 80% 474.40 4.04 147,428 36,498

D 25 5 336.5 80% 474.40 4.04 159,625 39,517

26 6 350.5 81% 478.35 3.99 167,652 42,004

27 7 363.5 81% 482.31 3.94 175,316 44,459
28 8 368.9 82% 486.26 3.90 179,384 46,052

29 9 371.6 83% 490.21 3.85 182,180 47,354

30 10 377.3 83% 494.17 3.80 186,460 49,080

31 11 376.5 84% 498.12 3.75 187,556 50,001

32 12 386.4 85% 502.07 3.70 194,012 52,393

33 13 389.8 85% 506.03 3.65 197,271 53,973

34 14 384.4 86% 509.98 3.61 196,061 54,357
C 35 15 370.5 87% 513.93 3.56 190,389 53,497
36 16 345.0 87% 517.89 3.50 178,652 50,980
37 17 328.0 88% 521.84 3.45 171,176 49,619
38 18 305.4 89% 525.79 3.40 160,558 47,288
39 19 261.9 89% 529.75 3.34 138,724 41,524
40 20 223.9 90% 533.70 3.29 119,495 36,361
41 21 196.3 91% 537.65 3.23 105,544 32,658
42 22 163.0 91% 541.61 3.18 88,306 27,793
43 23 141.8 92% 545.56 3.12 77,348 24,769
44 24 121.9 93% 549.51 3.07 67,002 21,837

B 45 25 104.5 93% 553.47 3.01 57,815 19,184

46 26 85.8 94% 557.42 2.95 47,809 16,188

47 27 71.5 95% 561.37 2.89 40,160 13,882
48 28 56.6 95% 565.33 2.83 31,983 11,291

49 29 43.3 96% 569.28 2.77 24,677 8,901

50 30 31.0 97% 573.23 2.71 17,784 6,558
51 31 20.2 97% 577.19 2.65 11,663 4,399
52 32 11.9 98% 581.14 2.59 6,887 2,658
53 33 8.2 99% 585.09 2.53 4,779 1,888
 07/06/2019 427071582.xls Chiller - Fix CAP+Stepless

54 34 3.8 99% 589.05 2.47 2,256 913

A 55 35 2.1 100% 593.00 2.41 1,240 515

56 36 1.2 100% 593.00 2.41 716 297
57 37 0.5 100% 593.00 2.41 309 128
58 38 0.4 100% 593.00 2.41 238 99

total 4,393,752 1,205,605

SEPR 3.64
 07/06/2019 427071582.xls Chiller - Step CAP

Declared cooling capacity at full load DC = declared cooling capacity at temperatures A, B, C and D If Cc is not determined by test
593.00 coefficient Cc shall be 0.9.
i.e. Point A (DC, in kW)

Degradation Calculation
DC in kW EER at this DC DC at part load EER at part load Degradation Capacity Ratio
Cooling demand (PR) (measured or (measured or (measured or (measured or coefficient Cc CR
EER (=DC(full load)*Partload) calculated) calculated) calculated) calculated) (=PR/DC)
EER A 2.41 593.00 593.00 2.41 − − - 1.00
EER B 3.05 553.47 620.00 3.05 310.00 2.90 0.90 0.89
EER C 3.66 513.93 650.00 3.66 325.00 3.50 0.90 0.79
EER D 4.24 474.40 680.00 4.24 340.00 4.05 0.90 0.70
Please consider: Selection of EERA, EERB, EERC, Measured or calculated cooling Measured or calculated part load capacity below cooling
EERD depends on different ambient temp capacity equal or above cooling demand. Leave DC and EER blank if step control not
conditions, load profile and application demand available/necessary.
temperature (HT, MT, LT) Lowest part load DC limited to > 10% of DC at full load.

cooling Ratio
j Tj (°C) hj part load % EERPL Ph*Tj PH*Tj/EERDC adjust
demand
1 -19 0.1 80% 474.40 4.13 40 10
2 -18 0.4 80% 474.40 4.13 193 47
3 -17 0.6 80% 474.40 4.13 307 74
4 -16 1.1 80% 474.40 4.13 500 121
5 -15 1.7 80% 474.40 4.13 826 200
6 -14 3.0 80% 474.40 4.13 1,413 343
7 -13 3.8 80% 474.40 4.13 1,799 436
8 -12 5.7 80% 474.40 4.13 2,697 654
9 -11 8.9 80% 474.40 4.13 4,240 1,028
10 -10 11.8 80% 474.40 4.13 5,603 1,358
11 -9 17.3 80% 474.40 4.13 8,201 1,988
12 -8 20.0 80% 474.40 4.13 9,497 2,302
13 -7 28.7 80% 474.40 4.13 13,630 3,304
14 -6 39.7 80% 474.40 4.13 18,837 4,566
15 -5 56.6 80% 474.40 4.13 26,857 6,511
16 -4 76.4 80% 474.40 4.13 36,226 8,782
17 -3 106.1 80% 474.40 4.13 50,317 12,198
18 -2 153.2 80% 474.40 4.13 72,689 17,621
19 -1 203.4 80% 474.40 4.13 96,499 23,393
20 0 248.0 80% 474.40 4.13 117,639 28,518
21 1 282.0 80% 474.40 4.13 133,784 32,432
22 2 275.9 80% 474.40 4.13 130,893 31,731
23 3 300.6 80% 474.40 4.13 142,610 34,571
24 4 310.8 80% 474.40 4.13 147,428 35,739
D 25 5 336.5 80% 474.40 4.13 159,625 38,696
26 6 350.5 81% 478.35 4.07 167,652 41,173
27 7 363.5 81% 482.31 4.02 175,316 43,625
28 8 368.9 82% 486.26 3.97 179,384 45,237
29 9 371.6 83% 490.21 3.91 182,180 46,566
30 10 377.3 83% 494.17 3.86 186,460 48,317
31 11 376.5 84% 498.12 3.81 187,556 49,281
32 12 386.4 85% 502.07 3.75 194,012 51,700
33 13 389.8 85% 506.03 3.70 197,271 53,325
34 14 384.4 86% 509.98 3.65 196,061 53,771
C 35 15 370.5 87% 513.93 3.59 190,389 52,989
36 16 345.0 87% 517.89 3.54 178,652 50,531
37 17 328.0 88% 521.84 3.48 171,176 49,217
38 18 305.4 89% 525.79 3.42 160,558 46,940
39 19 261.9 89% 529.75 3.36 138,724 41,251
40 20 223.9 90% 533.70 3.31 119,495 36,151
41 21 196.3 91% 537.65 3.25 105,544 32,496
42 22 163.0 91% 541.61 3.19 88,306 27,679
43 23 141.8 92% 545.56 3.13 77,348 24,689
44 24 121.9 93% 549.51 3.08 67,002 21,787
B 45 25 104.5 93% 553.47 3.02 57,815 19,158
46 26 85.8 94% 557.42 2.96 47,809 16,168
47 27 71.5 95% 561.37 2.90 40,160 13,866
48 28 56.6 95% 565.33 2.84 31,983 11,280
49 29 43.3 96% 569.28 2.77 24,677 8,894
50 30 31.0 97% 573.23 2.71 17,784 6,553
51 31 20.2 97% 577.19 2.65 11,663 4,396
52 32 11.9 98% 581.14 2.59 6,887 2,657
53 33 8.2 99% 585.09 2.53 4,779 1,888
54 34 3.8 99% 589.05 2.47 2,256 913
A 55 35 2.1 100% 593.00 2.41 1,240 515
56 36 1.2 100% 593.00 2.41 716 297
57 37 0.5 100% 593.00 2.41 309 128
07/06/2019 427071582.xls Chiller - Step CAP
58 38 0.4 100% 593.00 2.41 238 99
total 4,393,752 1,190,160

SEPR 3.69
Tool version 1.5.3
2013-09-01

To check for the latest version of this tool please see:

DG ENTR Ecodesign page for Professional Refrigeration

About this calculation tool

This calculation tool is provided to help suppliers to calculate the Seasonal Energy Performance Ratio (SEPR)
for their products based upon 4 rating point measurements (or calculations) of EER.

It is intended to assist suppliers to assess the seasonal performance of their products according to a
methodology that is to be used under the proposed European ecodesign regulation for industrial process
chillers.

This tool is provided free of charge and in good faith but without guarantee of accuracy. Users should
satisfy themselves that the output meets the requirement in the document: 'TRANSITIONAL METHOD FOR
DETERMINATION OF THE SEPR (SEASONAL ENERGY PERFORMANCE RATIO) for INDUSTRIAL PROCESS
CHILLERS (DRAFT)' which explains more details of the methodology.

What is SEPR? Seasonal Energy Performance Ratio

SEPR is the seasonal energy performance ratio of a process chiller. It is calculated from the EER of the process
chiller at 4 different ambient temperatures and cooling loads, called rating points. The required rating points
are specified in the document 'SEPR calculation method', showing for each rating point the necessary part
load ratio and air dry bulb temperature for the outdoor heat exchanger.
Temperature references for chillers with air-cooled and water-cooled condensers see table.

How to use the tool

There are two sheets: One for fixed capacity and stepless chillers; and a second for stepped capacity chillers.
Use the one appropriate to the chiller.

To use the spreadsheet:

1. Please insert the full load rated capacity in cell D3,
2. AND THEN declared rated capacity at the 3 part load rating points (B, C and D - cells D9:11)
3. Insert the declared EER at 4 rating points (cells E8:11).
4. In case of step capacity control also insert part load DC and EER at 3 rating points (B, C, D - cells
F9:G11)

The spreadsheet then calculates the SEPR automatically using a linear interpolation between the rating
points A, B, C, and D and an assumption of a constant capacity for temperatures above A and below D.

Feedback will be used to help improve the tool.

If you have any questions or comments about the use of this tool please send an email to:
ENTR-ECODESIGN@ec.europa.eu
Please put the phrase 'professional refrigeration' in the subject line.
Temperature Reference (°C):
A B C D

35 25 15 5
AIR (inlet)
30 23 16 9
WATER (inlet)
[35°C] [25°C] [15°C] [5°C]
Values in square brackets define the related
ambient temperature conditions