Effects of School Facilities On Student's Performances

Mary Immaculate School
Sta. Natividad Street, San Antonio Valley 6, Parañaque City
THE EFFECTS OF SCHOOL FACILITIES ON STUDENTS’
PERFORMANCES
A Research Proposal Presented to the Junior High School
Department of Mary Immaculate School
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements in Completion of the
Junior High School
By :
Michel Jude E. Placencia, Jr.
Aaliyah Mikaela A. Ignacio
Erish Alyssa R. Gaviola
Angelene M. Adriatico
Alijah Gavril D. David

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Approval Sheet…………………………………………………………………………………. i
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………. ii
Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………………… iii
Dedication……………………………………………………………………………………….. iv
CHAPTER I: PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………… 1
Significance of the Study………………………………………………………………….2
Statement of the Problem………………………………………………………………..3
Theoretical Framework…………………………………………………………………….4
Conceptual Framework…………………………………………………………………….4
Scope and Delimitation…………………………………………………………………….5
Definition of Terms…………………………………………………………………………..6
CHAPTER II: RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
Foreign Studies…………………………………………………………………………………7
Local Studies…………………………………………………………………………………….9
Foreign Literature…………………………………………………………………………..15
Local Literature……………………………………………………………………………….16
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY
Research Design…………………………………………………………………………….18
Population and Sampling……………………………………………………………….18
Research Instrument……………………………………………………………………..19
Data Collection……………………………………………………………………………….19
Statistical Treatment of Data………………………………………………………..19
CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION, AND
INTERPRETATION OF DATA
Figure 4.1……………………………………………………………………………………….22
Figure 4.2……………………………………………………………………………………….24
Figure 4.3……………………………………………………………………………………….26
Figure 4.4……………………………………………………………………………………….28
Figure 4.5……………………………………………………………………………………….30
Figure 4.6……………………………………………………………………………………….32
Figure 4.7……………………………………………………………………………………….34
Figure 4.8……………………………………………………………………………………….36
Figure 4.9……………………………………………………………………………………….38
Figure 4.10…………………………………………………………………………………….40
Figure 4.11…………………………………………………………………………………….42
Figure 4.12…………………………………………………………………………………….44
Figure 4.13…………………………………………………………………………………….46
Figure 4.14…………………………………………………………………………………….48
Figure 4.15…………………………………………………………………………………….50
Figure 4.16…………………………………………………………………………………….52
Figure 4.17…………………………………………………………………………………….54
Figure 4.18…………………………………………………………………………………….56
Figure 4.19…………………………………………………………………………………….58
Figure 4.20…………………………………………………………………………………….60
Figure 4.21…………………………………………………………………………………….62
CHAPTER V: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Summary……………………………………………………………………………………….64
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………..66
Recommendation…………………………………………………………………………..68
Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………..69
Mary Immaculate School
Sta. Natividad Street, San Antonio Valley 6, Parañaque City
Approval Sheet
This thesis entitled “The Effects of School Facilities on
Students performance” prepared and submitted by the researchers
in partial fulfillment of the requirement of Junior High School level,
examined and recommended for acceptance and approval for oral
examination.
_______________
Ms. Girlie Joy S. Francisco
Thesis Adviser
_______________
Date
Panel of Examiners
_______________ _______________
Mr. Aguinaldo F. Frias III Mr. Patrick Q. Ortega
_______________
__________________ ________________
Ms. Maria Christina O. Gomez Dr. Elenita O. De Asa
English Teacher/Academic Coordinator Principal
i
ABSTRACT
The paper examined the effects of school facilities on students’
performance was conducted to determine the relationship between
school facility conditions and school outcomes such as student
academic achievement, attendance, and discipline. The total
population of the study comprises all the grade 8 to 9 students of Mary
Immaculate School. The study adopted the use of descriptive survey
and 100 questionnaires were administered. The researchers gathered
data from the students of Mary Immaculate School. Random sampling
was applied. This study will inform the readers about the impact of
school facilities to the students' performance. It can also prove or
disprove speculations on the students' perception on school facility
roles and their function. The result of the study revealed that the
school facilities do in-fact affect the students' academic performance
based on the conducted survey given by the researchers. It was also
found that some of the school facilities are not used that very
frequently.
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost, the researchers would like to thank God for
His unconditional guidance and wisdom as they make this research.
The researchers owe a deep gratitude to Ms. Girlie Joy S.
Francisco, thesis adviser for her encouragement, patience, and
valuable supervision at every stage of their work. This work would not
have been this successful at the present form without her good
observation and intellectual directions in completing the paper.
The researchers also owe our special thanks to Mr. Aguinaldo F.
Frias III, for helping and willing to help them to solve the computation
and others.
To Ms. Maria Christina O. Gomez for her kind cooperation during
the research.
To Mr. Patrick Q. Ortega, for his guidance and patience has been
immeasurable.
To the beloved school principal Dr. Elenita O. De Asa, for her
encouragement and support has never faltered.
iii
DEDICATION
The researchers dedicate this to the Almighty God, who guide
them and never leaves them in making this research paper. To the
researchers' parents and loved ones, who gave them motivation.
Without them, they would not be able to be successful in their work
and for their prayer and sacrifice to educate us for their future.
To the researchers' beloved friends and schoolmates, who
responded in the survey and for their constant encouragement
throughout the duration of the paper. Without them, this research
would be incomplete.
iv
CHAPTER I
PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
In this chapter, it includes the background of the study being
developed, the theories and concept behind, the purpose of this study,
the scope and delimitations that the researchers established.
Introduction
Schools are established for the purpose of teaching and learning.
It is also more important if the students and teachers or professors are
properly accommodated to facilitate the teaching and learning. School
Facilities include restrooms, library, computer room, laboratory,
basketball court, infirmary, gymnasium, auditorium, music room, art
room, and cafeteria. Schools should be equipped with the above-
mentioned facilities, in order to improve the students’ learning
process.
To mention some good qualities of physical facilities, the school
should provide a well-lighted and well-ventilated rooms, a clean,
spacious and well-sanitized restrooms, a wider and clean playground,
gymnasium or auditorium, a clean and well-ventilated canteen, a well-
equipped music room and art room, a clean laboratory and computer
rooms equipped with devices, a library with set of different books,
1
magazines, journals and newspapers and an infirmary with
professional staff and equipped with medicines.
There is a significant likelihood that the facilities will positively
influence performance of students. Poor learning facilities can foster
negative attitudes just as exceptional designs may bolster
achievement.
Significance of the Study
This study will inform the readers about the impact of school
facilities to the students’ performances. It can also prove or disprove
speculations on the students’ perception on school facility roles and
their function, and would allow the researchers to know if there are
good or bad effects on this:
1. To the student – This study will show that students are more
enlightened to study with the clean surroundings and proper ventilated
in each facility, which leads them to be comfortable in school.
2. To the school staff/maintenance – In the classroom, teachers
are the ones who designs the room and make it more presentable in
the students’ eyes and they are the one who puts inspirational quotes
on the wall for the students to be motivated in coming to school
3. To the School administration – School administration is the
one whose responsible for the implementation of general rules and
2
regulations that the school has. The outcome of this study can help
them apply a better way of notifying on how important students should
behave in school grounds.
4. To the researchers – Researchers are the ones who should
gather information, analyze their topic, prove their speculations about
their study to certain places. The process and outcome of this study
will produce a great satisfaction, competence and professionalism in
the field.
Statement of the Problem
The purpose of this study is to test the possible outcome of the
school facilities on the students’ achievement, behavior, and
attendance. The researchers will try to find the effect of the school
facilities to the students. Researchers Question:
1. The objective of the researchers is to get the respondents’
demographic profile:
 Sex
 Age
 Grade level
2. Do school facilities have impact on students’ attendance?
3. Do school facilities have impact on students’ academic
performance?
3
4. Do school facilities have impact on students’ behavior?
Theoretical Framework
The analysis results presented significant spatial variations and
differing effects of school sizes and utilities on the academic
achievements of top performing schools across the study area. SGWR
modelling revealed that schools in sparsely populated rural areas with
basic facilities have performed better than schools in urban areas with
poor facilities, indicating that basic facilities are important in far-flung
schools. Since the effect on academic achievement varies depending
on the social and economic infrastructure, the provision of school
facilities should be based on the unique needs of each community. A
decentralized approach is beneficial for the management of school
facilities in the Philippines where education resources are limited.
Conceptual Framework
The flow of this study can be clarified by an IV and DV chart,
which means Independent and Dependent Variables. The researches
wanted to test on how School Facilities affects the students' academic
performances from Grade 8 to Grade 9 of Mary Immaculate School
S.Y. 2018-2019.
4
Independent Variable
• School Facilities
Dependent Variable
• Students' Performance
Figure 1.1 Conceptual Framework about effects of school facilities to
students’ performances
Scope and Delimitation
This study focuses on the effects of school facilities among Grade
8-9 students of Mary Immaculate School in Parañaque City.
This study aims to explore the possible relationship between
school facility conditions and school outcomes such as student
academic achievement, attendance, and discipline. It contains
information about the school facility, its needs and its issues.
Furthermore, it attempts to identify the needs of the group and
concerns of this study.
5
Definition of Terms
 Auditorium – a hall used for public gatherings, typically
speeches or stage performances.
 Expertise – expert skill or knowledge in a particular field.
 Gymnasium - a room or building equipped for gymnastics,
games, and other physical exercise.
 Impact - the action of one object coming forcibly into contact
with another.
 Implementation - the process of putting a decision or plan
into effect; execution.
 Infirmary – a clinic or hospital.
 School Facilities - responsive to the changing programs of
educational delivery, and at a minimum should provide a
physical environment.
 Spacious - (especially of a room or building) having ample
space.
 Students’ Performances - is the extent to which a student has
achieved their short or long-term educational goals.
 Well-lighted - provided with artificial light.
 Well-sanitized - make clean and hygienic; disinfect.
 Well-ventilated - to provide (a room, mine, etc.) with fresh air
in place of air that has been used or contaminate
6
CHAPTER II
RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter focuses on the different literature and studies that relate
to the researchers’ topic. Different sources were used as basis for the
citations used in this chapter.
Foreign Studies
According to Mark Schnieder (2002), it is stated that facility
attributes affect academic outcomes the most and in what manner and
degree. For example, a student who is academically inspired because
of ambience of the school.
Even though, for most parents, a school’s facilities are not
usually the highest priority when choosing a school, there are multiple
studies that indicate the quality of a school’s physical resources plays a
large role in determining student success. The research is examined in
three category: Environmental Conditions, School Size and Conditions
of Facilities.
In Environmental condition, there are some attributes: acoustics
and noise, air quality, noise and temperature control.
Acoustic and Noise shows how quiet classrooms are, as well as
open spaces, has been shown to impact student performance.
7
Excessive noise was also found to negatively impact teachers and
students.
Air quality shows the quality of indoor air is a major contributor
to absenteeism, especially amongst students with respiratory issues.
Lighting Artificial has been shown to have a negative impact on
students, whereas schools with a lot of natural light can boost morale
and reduce off-topic behaviour. One study found that students with
the most exposure to natural daylight progressed 20 percent faster in
math and 26 percent faster in reading than students who were taught
in environments with the least amount of natural light.
Temperature Control in which a person works affects
engagement levels and overall productivity —including student
achievement. The Penn State study found that the optimal
temperature range is between 20 and 23 degrees celsius.
School Size strongly supported by research dating back to the
1990s, school size has been shown to impact student performance –
larger schools tend to negatively impact students from low socio-
economic backgrounds, while smaller schools often had better rates of
attendance, extracurricular engagement, and a sense of belonging.
While it is difficult to apply these findings across the board (as there
are many large schools who have great student success) it is worth
keeping it in mind when searching for a school.
8
Condition of Facilites, this factor affects staff more than
students, but the thinking is that teachers’ perceptions of the quality of
the facilities impacts their job satisfaction, which indirectly affects
student performance. So whilst the quality of teaching staff, location
and educational philosophies may be higher on your checklist when
weighing up schooling options, keep in mind that facilities also play an
important role in determining student success.
Local Studies
In stationary variables, the results indicate that the provision of
as little as one to three teachers in excess of the recommended 1:35
teacher-to-pupil ratio of the country has a positive effect regardless of
location or local context. This is consistent with the findings of other
papers where teachers have a significant ‘within school’ effect on
student performance (Rivkin, Hanushek, and Kain 2005; Glewwe et al.
2011). More toilet facilities were also significantly associated with the
top performing schools regardless of location, although the influence is
small as in Jasper, Le and Bartram (2012), Adukia (2013) and Garn et
al. (2014). Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) is a key public
health issue in many poor countries and is essential for the survival
and development of children (UNICEF 2014). A review of the literature
indicates that most investigations correlate a school’s sanitary facilities
9
with either increased attendance or better health conditions (Bartlett
2003; Burton 2013). The small effect of sanitary facilities will be
rendered insignificant if combined with socio-economic variables
(being strong predictors of academic achievement).
Better road conditions are associated with the top performing
schools. The significant impact of improved road conditions on the
education outcomes of poor rural communities are depicted in other
papers as well, such as Levy (2004) and Mu and Van De Walle (2007).
They cited the following reasons as the likely cause: (a) absenteeism
among students and teachers dropped; (b) enrolment doubled and (c)
improved accessibility allowed the recruitment of more teachers and
staff.
The negative coefficient for proximity denotes that top
performing schools are usually located far from the local town halls.
The schools are usually located at a distance of 2–8 km from the town
centres. The negative coefficient for services in the SGWR model may
be attributed to the fact that the provision of services is not enough to
ensure better student performance. The custodians and users of these
facilities should also be provided with the skills so they can use and
maximize the available resources.
The low impact in the provision of services (e.g. school health
clinics, libraries and canteens) to academic performance can also be
10
due to the lack of support from politicians to fund manpower and
continuously provide amenities which are necessary to maximize the
resource. For example, due to limited funds in developing countries,
an existing health clinic can still lack the necessary preventive health
resources and skilled workers to run the facility effectively. Similarly, it
is rare for a school library among poorer schools to contain an updated
collection of learning materials. Poorer communities do not have the
necessary funds to manage these facilities, and external assistance
(either through government or private agencies) is deficient because
there is a low incentive for the providers to make the service available.
Batley and Mcloughlin (2015) described how public services such as
school health clinics that provide vaccinations and health campaigns
benefit the community as a whole and not the users directly.
For example, vaccine-preventable diseases will only be purged
when the whole community is vaccinated; polluted and contaminated
surroundings can only be eliminated when the whole community
participates in proper waste disposal.
Since the providers are unable to claim that a successful
outcome is due to their efforts (e.g. a healthy and clean environment
can be caused by several factors), Batley and Mcloughlin (2015)
concluded that there is no political salience in these types of public
goods which explains the lack of support from political leaders to
11
provide the service. While in non-stationary variables, the association
between top performing schools and buildings are strongest in the
north of Eastern Samar even though this province is prone to natural
calamities and armed conflict. It appears that schools in this
vulnerable area provide children with relatively safe places to play
within (Venton and Venton 2012; Vickery 1982). Further study is
needed to understand why the high occurrence of top performing
schools within this area is linked to schools that have more buildings
while in the other areas, the high occurrence of top performing schools
is more evenly distributed across all building quantities.
The prevalence of school buildings in the sparsely populated
rural regions of the study area is the result of a government effort in
2001 to solve inequality in education access by building one primary
school for every barangay, regardless of the considerations for
population. This project was successful in solving school quantity but
was unable to solve school quality. In fact, there were so many
schools built that the country had 3,600–3,800 undersubscribed public
elementary schools in school year 2007–2008 (Alba 2010).
But the extensive use of school buildings requires consistent
maintenance which is unfortunately obscured from the public view
than the construction of physical buildings, thereby politicians may not
be eager to prioritize it (Batley and Mcloughlin 2015). Future structural
12
repairs in these extra facilities are recurrent expenditures that small
schools cannot subsidize too. Therefore, in the case of about 10% of
public schools in the Philippines, the school facilities that were merely
erected for political reasons were later reported as underutilized rooms
and dilapidated buildings. Since rooms are contained within buildings,
we might expect that room hotspots would be similar to the building
hotspots.
However, this was not detected in the study area as room
hotspots were only seen in city centres. A possible explanation might
be that standard classrooms entail the provision of furniture (e.g.
seats, tables, electric fans, etc.) and other amenities necessary for
student instruction, which require additional financial resources that
small rural schools cannot support. Furthermore, these amenities are
public goods with low visibility that tend to be less prioritized by
elected officials especially in democratic governments (Batley and
Mcloughlin (2015). Further study is needed to understand why
associations between classrooms and top performing schools are
stronger in rural parts of Leyte than in other locations within the study
area. The provision of utilities is lowest in the province of Eastern
Samar than in any of the other provinces in the study area. Since
public school facilities normally reflect the socio-economic conditions of
13
the municipality, we can assume that local households of Eastern
Samar are also experiencing a deficiency in basic utilities.
A possible explanation to the link between the high occurrence of
top performing schools and the provision of more buildings and better
utilities in this area is that children might have better academic
performance if they are able to gain access to these basic amenities
which are lacking at their home. Government reports indicate a timely
intervention that education resource projects for the year 2016 will
focus on the provision and improvement of water and sanita tion
facilities (UNESCO 2015 report). The low provision of utilities and
insignificant effect of school buildings in the western areas of Agusan
del Sur suggests that municipal funding to construct school buildings
might have been put to better use if it was devoted to the provision of
school utilities and toilets instead. This does not apply for all locations
and the correlation cannot be generalized because the situation in
each district is unique. For example, in the rural northern areas of
Eastern Samar, both buildings and utilities have significant positive
contributions so it cannot be concluded that buildings will be a waste
of resources and should be dropped in favour of utilities. Hence, the
best solution will depend on the context of each district.
Considering all things equal, top performing schools were fewer
than expected in urban locations as indicated by the insignificant and
14
low values of the intercept in these areas. This was especially
prominent in Tacloban (city in Leyte), Bayugan (city in Agusan del Sur)
and Bislig (city in Surigao del Sur). However, there is a raised
occurrence of top performing schools in the west of Ormoc (also a city
of Leyte) and the north of Butuan (this is a city in Agusan del Norte).
The occurrence might be explained by the fact that these cities are the
education centres in their respective regional administrations.
Foreign Literature
On any given school day, about twenty percent of Americans
spend time in a school building. The average age of our school is close
to fifty years, and studies by the U. S. General Accounting Office have
documented widespread physical deficiencies in many of them. Faced
with an aging building stock and growing, shifting student enrollments,
states and communities are working hard to build and modernize K-12
facilities.
Those involved in school planning and design see this as an
opportunity to enhance academic outcomes by creating better learning
environments. Their logic is compelling—how can we expect students
to perform at high levels in school buildings that are substandard?
We all know that clean, quiet, safe, comfortable, and healthy
environments are an important component of successful teaching and
15
learning. But which facility attributes affect academic outcomes the
most and in what manner and degree?
A growing body of research addresses these questions. Some of
it is good, some less so; much of it is inconclusive.
Local Literature
Learning is a complex activity that supremely tests students'
motivation and physical condition. Teaching resources, teachers'
skill, and curriculum -- these all play a vital role in a child's education.
But what about the physical condition and design of the actual
school facility itself? How do they shape a child's learning experience?
Not because it is a public school, students don't have the right to
have a well-maintained school facility. Examples of these are lacking of
classrooms, lacking of tables and chairs, poor ventilation, poor comfort
rooms and canteens. Usage of over dated books and the like. These
students want to study and even though they are only in a public
school, it doesn't mean that they don't have the right to study in a
comfortable classroom. And i hope that the government should do
something about this because these students have the right to have
this well-maintained school facilities and education is very important.
An effective school facility is responsive to the changing programs
of educational delivery, and at a minimum should provide a physical
16
environment that is comfortable, safe, secure, accessible, well
illuminated, well ventilated, and aesthetically pleasing. The school
facility consists of not only the physical structure and the variety of
building systems, such as mechanical, plumbing, electrical and power,
telecommunications, security, and fire suppression systems. The
facility also includes furnishings, materials and supplies, equipment
and information technology, as well as various aspects of the building
grounds, namely, athletic fields, playgrounds, areas for outdoor
learning, and vehicular access and parking.
The school facility is much more than a passive container of the
educational process: it is, rather, an integral component of the
conditions of learning. The layout and design of a facility contributes to
the place experience of students, educators, and community members.
Depending on the quality of its design and management, the facility
can contribute to a sense of ownership, safety and security,
personalization and control, privacy as well as sociality, and
spaciousness or crowdedness. When planning, designing, or managing
the school facility, these facets of place experience should, when
possible, be taken into consideration.
17
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the methods used to attain the data to be
able to interpret them for this study. These methods include the
researchers’ design, population and sampling, research instruments
and statistical treatment of data.
Research Design
This study aims to identify the effects of school facilities to
students’ performances. In order to achieve the statement of the
study, the researchers made a descriptive and quantitative research
design.
The researchers will use random quantitative approach for they
will get the results of the study through some mathematical equations.
The descriptive design fits the study to be achieved to describe the
effects of school facilities to students’ performances.
Population and Sampling
The total number of respondents for the study is 100. It is
composed of grade 8 and grade 9 students enrolled in Mary
Immaculate School A.Y. 2018-2019. Participation is voluntary.
18
Research Instruments
In this method, the questionnaires or survey will serve as the
main data-gathering instrument for this study.
The students from each section of Grade 8 and 9 will be given a
survey sheet. Students would be able to answer 10 questions from the
paper given to them. The responses of the students will be gathered
and interpreted by the researchers.
Data Collection
The researchers gathered the data from the grade 8 and grade 9
students of Mary Immaculate School of A. Y. 2018-2019. Simple
Random Sampling was applied. A questionnaire was provided to collect
the said data as source to come up with the result of the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data
To obtain the total data from the gathered questionnaires, the
respondents’ answers were tallied together and were applied with
formula.
The data from the answers of the respondents about their profile
were obtainable using the frequency and percentage distribution.
Percentages were computed to obtain comparisons.
19
Equation:
Percentage:
P=f/N x 100
Where:
P = percentage
f = frequency
N = population
Mean:
x̄ = f/N
Where:
f = frequency
N = population
x̄ = mean
Variance:
S² = (Σx - ̄x̄)²/(n – 1)
Where:
Σx = total mean
̄x̄ = mean
N = population
20
Standard Deviation:
SD = √ S²
Where:
S² = Result of the Variance
21
CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter presents the findings, analysis and interpretation of
data gathered which were acquired from 100 respondents from Grade
8 and 9 students of Mary Immaculate School 2018–2019 whose main
objective is to find out the effects of school facilities of student’s
performances. The results of the study were presented in graphs by
age and by sex. These were also interpreted by the researchers.
The number of students per section is stated as follows:
Grade Level Number of Respondents
Grade 8 – St. Bridget 30
Grade 8 – St. Mark 25
Grade 9 – St. Augustine 30
Grade 9 – St. Monica 15
Total 100
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1 shows the number of respondents of each grade level
and section. It is shown on the table above. The Grade 8 - St. Bridget
needs 30 respondents while the Grade 8 - St. Mark needs 25
respondents in the total of 55 students. The Grade 9 - St. Augustine
also need 30 respondents while the Grade 9 - St. Monica needs 15
22
respondents in the total of 45 respondents. If you add the two batches
together, the sum of the respondents is 100.
23
AGE GROUP
QUESTION 1
Do school facilities affect the student's performances?
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
Yes
20% 42%
No
15%
23% 22%
10%
5%
8%
3% 2%
0%
13 years old 14 years old 15 years old
Mean: 0.85 0.84 0.91
Variance: 0.08 0.23 0.07

Standard Deviation: 0.28 0.47 0.26
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2 shows the percentage of respondents who answered
“Yes” or “No” in the first question of the survey of the researchers.
Based on the data gathered, there are a total number of 26
respondents that are 13 years old and only 23 respondents with the
percentage of 23% have answered “Yes” while 3 respondents with the
percentage of 3% answered “No”. In the 14 years old section, there
24
are a total of 50 respondents and only 42 respondents with the
percentage of 42% answered “Yes” while 8 respondents with the
percentage of 8% answered “No”. And lastly, in the 15 years old
section, there are a total of 24 respondents and only 22 respondents
with the percentage of 22% while 2 respondents with the percentage
of 2% answered “No”.
The mean for the 13 years old is 0.85 which is considered as yes.
The 14 years old is 0.84, and the 15 years old is 0.91 which is also
considered as yes.
The variance for the 13 years old is 0.08, 0.23 for the 14 years
old and 0.07 for the 15 years old. The variance of the 14 years old is
less than the 13 years old. Therefore the variance of the 14 years old
is considered as heterogeneous. While the variance between the 13
years old and the 15 years old, the 13 years old is less than the 15
years old. With that said, the 15 years old is considered as
homogeneous.
The standard deviation of the 13 years old is 0.28, 0.47 for the 14
years old and 0.26 for the 15 years old. Based on the variance, the 15
years old is homogeneous, it is also considered as reliable and since
the 14 years old is heterogeneous, it is most likely not reliable.
25
QUESTION 2
Do you think the school facilities affect the academic standing?
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
Yes
20% 40%
No
15%
10% 19% 21%
5% 10%
7%
3%
0%
Mean: 0.70 0.8 0.87
Variance: 0.05 0.20 0.07
Figure 4.3
“Yes” or “No” in the second question of the survey of the researchers.
26
considered as yes.
less than the 15 years old. Therefore the variance of the 14 years old
homogeneous.
years old is homogeneous it is also considered as reliable and since the
15 years old is heterogeneous, it is most likely not reliable.
27
QUESTION 3
Do you believe that the school facilities will provide good
qualities and benefits for every student?
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
46% Yes
20%
No
15%
25%
10% 20%
5%
1% 4% 4%
0%
Mean: 0.92 0.92 0.83
Variance: 0.09 0.27 0.05
Figure 4.4
“Yes” or “No” in the third question of the survey of the researchers.
percentage of 96% have answered “Yes” while 1 respondent with the
28
considered as yes.
less than the 13 years old. Therefore, the variance of the 14 years old
homogeneous.
29
QUESTION 4
Does the school restroom have enough cubicles in each floor?
35%
30%
25%
20%
Yes
15% 31% No
22%
10% 19%
15%
5% 9%
4%
0%
Mean: 0.81 0.62 0.62
Variance: 0.07 0.12 0.03

Figure 4.5
“Yes” or “No” in the fourth question of the survey of the researchers.
30
considered as yes.
homogeneous.
31
QUESTION 5
Is the school court spacious?
35%
30%
25%
20%
Yes
33%
15% No
22%
10%
17% 18%
5%
6%
4%
0%
Mean: 0.81 0.66 0.75

Variance: 0.07 0.14 0.04
Figure 4.6
“Yes” or “No” in the fifth question of the survey of the researchers.
32
considered as yes.
homogeneous.
33
QUESTION 6
Is the school canteen well-ventilated and clean?
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
Yes
20% 39% No
15%
10% 22%
15%
5% 11% 9%
4%
0%
Mean: 0.81 0.78 0.37
Variance: 0.07 0.19 0.01

Figure 4.7
“Yes” or “No” in the sixth question of the survey of the researchers.
34
considered as yes.
homogeneous.
35
QUESTION 7
Is the computer lab sufficiently equipped?
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25% Yes
43% No
20%
15%
23%
10% 18%
5%
3% 7% 6%
0%
Mean: 0.85 0.86 0.57
Variance: 0.08 0.24 0.06
Figure 4.8
“Yes” or “No” in the seventh question of the survey of the researchers.
36
considered as yes.
homogeneous.
37
QUESTION 8
Does the library contain different set of books?
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
Yes
20% 42%
No
15%
10%
18%
14%
5% 10%
8% 8%
0%
Mean: 0.66 0.84 0.58

Variance: 0.04 0.23 0.02
Figure 4.9
“Yes” or “No” in the eighth question of the survey of the researchers.
38
considered as yes.
homogeneous.
39
QUESTION 9
Is the clinic well-lighted, clean and equipped with different
kind of medicines?
40%
35%
30%
25%
20% Yes
35% No
15%
23%
10%
15% 14%
5% 12%
3%
0%
Mean: 0.85 0.7 0.58

Variance: 0.08 0.16 0.02
Figure 4.10
“Yes” or “No” in the ninth question of the survey of the researchers.
40
The mean for the 13 years old is 0.85 which is considered as
yes. The 14 years old is 0.7, and the 15 years old is 0.58 which is also
considered as yes.
homogeneous.
41
QUESTION 10
Does the music room contain different set of instruments?
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25% Yes
44% No
20%
15%
26%
10% 19%
5%
1% 6% 5%
0%
Mean: 0.96 0.88 0.79
Variance: 0.10 0.25 0.05

Figure 4.11
“Yes” or “No” in the tenth question of the survey of the researchers.
percentage of 26% have answered “Yes” while 1 respondent with the
42
considered as yes.
homogeneous.
43
SEX GROUP
QUESTION 1
Do school facilities affect the student's performances?
60%
50%
40%
30% Yes
49% No
20% 39%
10%
3% 9%
0%
Female Male
Mean: 0.92 0.84

Variance: 0.21 0.28
Standard Deviation: 0.45 0.52
Figure 4.12
“Yes” or “No” in the first question of the survey of the researchers.
respondents that are female and only 39 respondents with the
percentage of 3% answered “No”. While the male have a total of 58
respondents and only 49 respondents with the percentage of 49%
answered “Yes” while 9 respondents with the percentage of 9%
answered “No”.
44
The mean for the male is 0.84 which is considered as yes and
0.92 for the female, which is also considered as yes.
The variance for the male is 0.28 and 0.21 for the female. The
variance of the male is less than the female. Therefore, the variance of
the male is considered as heterogeneous and the variance of the
female is homogeneous.
The standard deviation of the male is 0.52 and 0.45 for the
female. Based on the variance, the female is homogeneous it is also
considered as reliable and since the male is heterogeneous, it is most
likely not reliable.
45
QUESTION 2
Do you think the school facilities affect the academic standing?
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
Yes
20% 39% 41%
No
15%
10%
17%
5%
3%
0%
Female Male
Mean: 0.92 0.70

Variance: 0.21 0.20
Figure 4.13
“Yes” or “No” in the second question of the survey of the researchers.
answered “No”.
46
variance of the female is less than the male. Therefore, the variance of
the female is considered as heterogeneous and the variance of the
male is homogeneous.
female. Based on the variance, the male is homogeneous it is also
considered as reliable and since the female is heterogeneous, it is
most likely not reliable.
47
QUESTION 3
Do you believe that the school facilities will provide good
qualities and benefits for every student?
60%
50%
40%
30% Yes
No
48%
20% 42%
10%
10%
0
0%
Female Male
Mean: 1 0.82
Variance: 0.24 0.27
Figure 4.14
“Yes” or “No” in the third question of the survey of the researchers.
respondents that are female and all 42 respondents with the
percentage of 42% have answered “Yes”. While the male have a total
of 58 respondents and only 48 respondents with the percentage of
48
48% answered “Yes” while 10 respondents with the percentage of
10% answered “No”.
The mean for the male is 0.82 which is considered as yes and 0.1
for the female, which is also considered as yes.
49
QUESTION 4
Does the school restroom have enough cubicles in each floor?
40%
35%
30%
25%
20% Yes
33% 35%
15% No
10% 23%
5% 9%
0%
Female Male
Mean: 0.78 0.60

Variance: 0.15 0.14
Figure 4.15
“Yes” or “No” in the fourth question of the survey of the researchers.
answered “No”.
50
variance of the female is less than the male. Therefore, the variance of
the female is considered as heterogeneous and the variance of the
male is homogeneous.
female. Based on the variance, the male is homogeneous it is also
considered as reliable and since the female is heterogeneous, it is
most likely not reliable.
51
QUESTION 5
Is the school court spacious?
40%
35%
30%
25%
20% Yes
38%
35% No
15%
10% 20%
5%
7%
0%
Female Male
Mean: 0.83 0.65

Variance: 0.17 0.17
Figure 4.16
“Yes” or “No” in the fifth question of the survey of the researchers.
52
answered “No”.
variance of the male and female are equal. Therefore, the variance of
the female and male is considered as homogeneous.
female. Based on the variance of both sex, they are equal. Therefore,
it is both are reliable.
53
QUESTION 6
Is the school canteen well-ventilated and clean?
40%
35%
30%
25%
20% Yes
35% No
15%
25% 23%
10%
17%
5%
0%
Female Male
Mean: 0.59 0.60

Variance: 0.08 0.14
Figure 4.17
“Yes” or “No” in the sixth question of the survey of the researchers.
percentage of 25% have answered “Yes” while 17 respondents with
the percentage of 17% answered “No”. While the male have a total of
58 respondents and only 35 respondents with the percentage of 35%
answered “No”.
54
55
QUESTION 7
Is the computer lab sufficiently equipped?
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25% Yes
46%
20% No
37%
15%
10%
5% 12%
5%
0%
Female Male
Mean: 0.88 0.79

Variance: 0.19 0.25
Figure 4.18
“Yes” or “No” in the seventh question of the survey of the researchers.
answered “No”.
56
The standard deviation of the male is 0.5 and 0.43 for the female.
Based on the variance, the female is homogeneous it is also
57
QUESTION 8
Does the library contain different set of books?
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25% Yes
45%
20% No
15% 29%
10%
5% 13%
3%
0%
Female Male
Mean: 0.69 0.77

Variance: 0.11 0.24
Figure 4.19
“Yes” or “No” in the eighth question of the survey of the researchers.
answered “No”.
58
59
QUESTION 9
Is the clinic well-lighted, clean and equipped with different
kind of medicines?
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25% Yes
47%
20% No
15%
27%
10%
15%
5% 11%
0%
Female Male
Mean: 0.64 0.81

Variance: 0.10 0.26
Figure 4.20
“Yes” or “No” in the ninth question of the survey of the researchers.
percentage of 27% have answered “Yes” while 15 respondents with
the percentage of 15% answered “No”. While the male have a total of
58 respondents and only 47 respondents with the percentage of 47%
answered “No”.
60
61
QUESTION 10
Does the music room contain different set of instruments?
60%
50%
40%
30% Yes
53%
No
20%
36%
10%
6% 5%
0%
Female Male
Mean: 0.55 0.91

Variance: 0.18 0.33
Figure 4.21
“Yes” or “No” in the tenth question of the survey of the researchers.
answered “No”.
62
63
CHAPTER V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
This chapter presents a general summary of the present
research work carried out by the researchers. The outlines of areas
discussed were the conclusions, recommendation and suggestion for
further studies
Summary
The Thesis entitled “The Effects of School Facilities on Students
Performances” which is all about how the school facilities will affect the
students’ academic performances and it was conducted in order to
explore the possible relationship between school facility conditions and
school outcomes such as student academic achievement, attendance
and discipline. This study also includes the condition of school facilities
has an important impact on student performances
The researchers gathered information and data through the use
of survey questionnaires. These questionnaires contains question that
fit to the targeted respondents. These respondents are from the Grade
8 to 9 level students of Mary Immaculate School. There were (100)
students that answered questions that will be able to answer the
statement of the problem given in the chapter one of the study.
64
• Based on the survey forms, majority of the respondents said
that the school facilities does affect the students’ performances, and
13% of the respondents said that it doesn’t affect the students’
performances.
• Majority of the respondents said that the school facilities
affects the academic standing of a student, while 20% of the students
said it does not affect the academic standing.
• 91% of the respondents said that the school facilities provide
good qualities and benefits for every students and only 9% of the
respondents said that it does not provide good qualities and benefits
for every students.
• Based on the survey forms, 68% percent of the respondents
said that the school rest room has enough room cubicles in each floor,
while 32% percent of the respondents said that the school rest room
has not enough cubicle for each floor.
• 73% of the respondents answered yes, the school court is
spacious. The remaining 27% answered no.
• 70% of the respondents find the school canteen is well –
ventilated and clean. The remaining 30% find it not well – ventilated
and clean.
65
• A great number of 84% answered that the computer lab is
sufficiently equipped. 16% answered that the computer lab is not
sufficiently equipped.
• 74% of the respondents said the library does contain different
set of books, while only 26% said it does not contain different set of
books.
• 70% of the respondents answered yes which means they agree
that the clinic is well-lighted, clean and equipped with different kind of
medicines. The remaining 30% answered no.
• 88% of the respondents answered yes which means they
agreed that the music room contains a different set of instruments.
And the remaining 12% answered no.
Conclusion
On the basis of the findings, the study concluded that:
a. Majority of the respondents said that the school facilities
affects the students’ performances and it had a big affect on students’
academic performances.
b. School facilities such as sport facilities, learning facilities,
Recreational facilities, and Health facilities have huge affect on the
academic standings of a student.
66
c. The school facilities actually provide good qualities and
benefits for every student. This shows that school facilities have a
positive affect on the students.
d. The school restroom does have enough cubicles for some
students, majority of the respondents said.
e. The school court is spacious. This shows that the school court
has enough room for the players/students to do fun activities such as
sports.
f. Majority of the respondents from 13 to 14 years old said that
the school canteen is well-ventilated and cleaned, but the minority of
the respondent from 15 years old said no. This shows that students
from 15 years old that the school canteen makes them feel
uncomfortable.
g. The computer lab is sufficiently equipped. This shows that the
computer lab has enough equipment for every student.
h. The library is only used when there are contests or activities,
but the majority of the respondents said that the library contains
different set of books. This shows that the library can have a great use
if it is used frequently by the students.
i. Majority of the respondents answered yes that the clinic is
very well lighted, clean and equipped with different kinds of medicine.
67
Which means that if the students is not feeling well they can be easily
be helped through the medicine that can be found on the clinic
j. The majority of the respondents answered yes which means
that the music room contains different set of instruments to try.
Recommendation
On the basis of findings and conclusions the following
recommendations are made:
• To students, encourage them also to be aware and
knowledgeable about their school environment, help them to be apart
of the community and make them feel welcome.
• To the school staff/maintenance, help the students to prevent
lower academic performances and make an organization that consist
an activity that can motivate the students to study.
• To the school administration, the students should always be
maintained and should also manage other facilities in the school as
well.
• To the future researchers, the researcher should increase the
numbers of respondent and provide a clearer survey to be able to
know if school facilities can affect the academic performances of a
student. And to conduct another study in different variables.
68
Bibliography
 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1066877.pdf
 http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/ETD-
TAMU-2054/MCGOWEN-DISSERTATION.pdf?sequence=1
 https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/osu1164663224
/inline
 https://www.tsc.nsw.edu.au/tscnews/just-how-important-are-a-
schools-facilities
 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED470979
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308760536_Investiga
ting_the_relationship_between_school_facilities_and_academic_
achievements_through_geographically_weighted_regression
 https://scholar.google.com.ph/scholar?q=effects+of+school+faci
lities+on+students+performance&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi
=scholart#d=gs_qabs&p=&u=%23p%3DD1RT4VZZnRQJ
 https://abcdeducation.weebly.com/poor-facilities-in-public-
schools.html?fbclid=IwAR3kz5GqeUQttm3XWqa9naOfhz957Q-
mPJxpGCSuD0L43X8KOncwFel8CJQ
 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19475683.2016.
1231717
69
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Letter to the Validator

APPENDIX B
Survey Paperwork
Good Day:
This is the scoring rubrics for the validation questionnaire by the
researchers. The title of the researcher’s study is “The Effects of
School Facilities on Students’ Performances of Grades 8 to 9 Students
of Mary Immaculate School. The purpose of this study is to know the
possible effects of school facilities towards the cognitive, psychomotor
and affective learning of the students.
The overall score of the rubrics make up a total of 20 points.
Calculating the mean can cover the ranges of:
Range Meaning
3.75 – 4.99 Excellent
2.5 – 3.74 Good
1.25 – 2.49 Fair
0 – 1.24 Poor
Thank you for giving the researchers your time and cooperation.
Your participation is deeply appreciated. You can proceed with
evaluating the questionnaire now.

Survey Rubrics
Rating
Category 4 3 2 1 Score
Purpose Purpose is Purpose is Purpose is Purpose is not
stated clearly.stated stated vaguely. stated.
somewhat
clearly.
Clarity of Questions are Questions are Questions are Questions are
Questions crystal clear very clear and somewhat confusing and
and a student a student clear and a ambiguous.
would not have might have to student would
to ask for ask for have to ask for
clarification. clarification. clarification.
Content All essential Most of the Some of the One or fewer

questions are essential essential essential
properly questions are questions are questions are
addressed. properly properly addressed.
addressed. addressed.
Spelling/ All words are Most words Most words Numerous
Grammar spelled are spelled are spelled spelling errors.
correctly. correctly. correctly. Grammar,
Grammar, Grammar, Grammar, punctuation,
punctuation, punctuation, punctuation, spacing and
spacing and spacing and spacing and word usage
word usage are word usage are word usage have a number
appropriate. most have some of errors.
appropriate. error.
Utility Easy to use and Easy to follow. Choppy, but Difficult to
pleasant to gets the job follow and is
look at. done. jumbled.
Total Score:
___________________
Mr. Aguinaldo F. Frias III

Survey Rubrics
Rating
stated clearly. stated stated stated.
somewhat vaguely.
clearly.
would not might have to student would
have to ask for ask for have to ask for

word usage word usage word usage have a
are are most have some number of
appropriate. appropriate. error. errors.
Utility Easy to use Easy to follow. Choppy, but Difficult to
and pleasant gets the job follow and is
to look at. done. jumbled.
Total Score:
____________________

Survey Rubrics
Rating
stated clearly.stated stated vaguely. stated.
somewhat
clearly.
would not have might have to student would
to ask for ask for have to ask for

word usage are word usage are word usage have a number
appropriate. most have some of errors.
appropriate. error.
Utility Easy to use and Easy to follow. Choppy, but Difficult to
pleasant to gets the job follow and is
look at. done. jumbled.
Total Score:
__________________
Mr. Patrick Q. Ortega

APPENDIX C
Letter to the Subject Teachers

APPENDIX D
Questionnaire
Name: Sex: o Male o

Female
Grade and Sec: Age:
Survey about “The Effects of School Facilities on Students’

Performances”
Directions: Check (/) your answer.
1. Do School Facilities affect the Student’s Performances?
o Yes
o No
2. Do you think the School Facilities affect the academic standing?
o Yes
o No
3. Do you believe that the School Facilities will provide good qualities
and benefits for every student?
o Yes
o No
4. Do the school restroom have enough cubicles in each floor?
o Yes
o No
5. Is the school court spacious?
o Yes
o No
6. Is the school canteen well-ventilated and cleaned?
o Yes
o No
7. Is the computer lab sufficiently equipped?
o Yes
o No
8. Does the library contain different set of books?
o Yes
o No
9. Is the clinic well-lighted, clean and equipped with different kind of
medicines?
o Yes
o No
10. Does the music room contain different set of instruments?
o Yes
o No
APPENDIX E
Questionnaire with Answers

APPENDIX E
Questionnaire with answers

APPENDIX E

APPENDIX E

APPENDIX E

APPENDIX F
Tables
Number of Respondents
Grade Level Number of Respondents
Grade 8 – St. Bridget 30
Grade 8 – St. Mark 25
Grade 9 – St. Augustine 30
Grade 9 – St. Monica 15
Total 100
QUESTION 1
Choices Frequency Percentage
Yes 88 88%
No 12 12%
Total 100 100%
QUESTION 2
Yes 80 80%
No 20 20%
Total 100 100%

APPENDIX F
Tables
QUESTION 3
Yes 90 90%
No 10 10%
Total 100 100%
QUESTION 4
Yes 68 68%
No 32 32%
Total 100 100%
QUESTION 5
Yes 73 73%
No 27 27
Total 100 100%

APPENDIX F
Tables
QUESTION 6
Yes 60 60%
No 40 40%
Total 100 100%
QUESTION 7
Yes 83 83
No 17 17
Total 100 100%
QUESTION 8
Yes 74 74%
No 26 26%
Total 100 100%

APPENDIX F
Tables
QUESTION 9
Yes 74 74%
No 26 26%
Total 100 100%
QUESTION 10
Yes 89 89%
No 11 11%
Total 100 100%

APPENDIX G
Documentation
Grade 8 – St. Mark
Grade 8 – St. Bridget

APPENDIX G
Documentation
Grade 9 – St. Augustine
Grade 9 – St. Monica

CURRICULUM VITAE
David, Alijah Gavril D.

U9146 Fountain Breeze, Lombos Ave.,
Brgy. San Isidiro, Sucat, Parañaque City
09475662622
david_alijah@yahoo.com
PERSONAL DATA
Age: 15
Gender: Male
Civil Status: Single
Religion: Roman Catholic
Date of Birth: July 22, 2003
Dialect/language spoken: Filipino and English
Educational Attainment
Elementary
Name of School: Holy Family Parochial School
Year Attended: 2009 – 2010
Name of School: Mary Immaculate School
High School
Achievements
Overall Top 10 in Grade 9
1st place in Bible Quiz Study in Grade 8
3rd place in Bible Quiz Study in Grade 9
CURRICULUM VITAE
Placencia, Michel Jude Jr. E.

1857-A Receiver St., Brgy. CAA, BF Int’l,
Las Piñas City
09052622716
mj12192002@gmail.com
PERSONAL DATA
Age: 15
Gender: Male
Date of Birth: December 19, 2002
Elementary
Year Attended: 2009-2015
High School
Achievements
SG Officer (2018-2019)
Won Various Honors in Elementary
Overall Top 8 in Grade 7
CURRICULUM VITAE
Ignacio, Aaliyah Mikaela A.

524A M. Santos St., Martinville Subd.,
Las Piñas City
09154442462
aaliyahignacio@yahoo.com
PERSONAL DATA
Age: 16
Gender: Female
Date of Birth: August 31, 2002
Elementary
Year Attended: 2009 – 2010 and 2012 – 2015
Name of School: Young Achiever International School
High School
Achievements
3 consecutive years a member of LFMG (2016 – 2018)
3rd place in Tagisan in Talino (Grade 7-8)
3rd place in Pagsulat ng Sanaysay
CURRICULUM VITAE
Gaviola, Erish Alyssa R.

Blk 8 lot 1 F. Aguilar St., Martinville Subd.,
Las Piñas City
09657131869
erishalyssa@gmail.com
PERSONAL DATA
Age: 17
Gender: Female
Date of Birth: November 6, 2001
Elementary
High School
Year Attended; 2015 – 2019
Achievements
Honored student in preschool to elementary
Overall top 8 in Grade 9
Model Cadet in CAT
CURRICULUM VITAE
Adriatico, Angelene M.
6176 Salvador Estate, Parañaque City
826 – 810
Sansaandfrisk18@gmail.com
PERSONAL DATA
Age: 16
Gender: Female
Civil Status : Single
Date of Birth: November 11, 2002
Elementary
Year Attended: 2009- 2015
High School:
Achievements
1st place in oration in Grade 9
3rd place in bible quiz in Grade 6
CAT Officer

Effects of School Facilities On Student's Performances

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Effects of School Facilities On Student's Performances

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Mary Immaculate School

Sta. Natividad Street, San Antonio Valley 6, Parañaque City

THE EFFECTS OF SCHOOL FACILITIES ON STUDENTS’

A Research Proposal Presented to the Junior High School

Department of Mary Immaculate School

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements in Completion of the

Junior High School

Michel Jude E. Placencia, Jr.

Aaliyah Mikaela A. Ignacio

Erish Alyssa R. Gaviola

Alijah Gavril D. David

CHAPTER I: PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Significance of the Study………………………………………………………………….2

Statement of the Problem………………………………………………………………..3

Scope and Delimitation…………………………………………………………………….5

CHAPTER II: RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY

Population and Sampling……………………………………………………………….18

Statistical Treatment of Data………………………………………………………..19

CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION, AND

CHAPTER V: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Sta. Natividad Street, San Antonio Valley 6, Parañaque City

This thesis entitled “The Effects of School Facilities on

Students performance” prepared and submitted by the researchers

in partial fulfillment of the requirement of Junior High School level,

examined and recommended for acceptance and approval for oral

The paper examined the effects of school facilities on students’

performance was conducted to determine the relationship between

school facility conditions and school outcomes such as student

academic achievement, attendance, and discipline. The total

population of the study comprises all the grade 8 to 9 students of Mary

Immaculate School. The study adopted the use of descriptive survey

and 100 questionnaires were administered. The researchers gathered

data from the students of Mary Immaculate School. Random sampling

school facilities to the students' performance. It can also prove or

disprove speculations on the students' perception on school facility

school facilities do in-fact affect the students' academic performance

based on the conducted survey given by the researchers. It was also

His unconditional guidance and wisdom as they make this research.

The researchers owe a deep gratitude to Ms. Girlie Joy S.

Francisco, thesis adviser for her encouragement, patience, and

observation and intellectual directions in completing the paper.

The researchers also owe our special thanks to Mr. Aguinaldo F.

To Ms. Maria Christina O. Gomez for her kind cooperation during

To the beloved school principal Dr. Elenita O. De Asa, for her

encouragement and support has never faltered.

The researchers dedicate this to the Almighty God, who guide

researchers' parents and loved ones, who gave them motivation.

Without them, they would not be able to be successful in their work

To the researchers' beloved friends and schoolmates, who

responded in the survey and for their constant encouragement

throughout the duration of the paper. Without them, this research

In this chapter, it includes the background of the study being

the scope and delimitations that the researchers established.

Schools are established for the purpose of teaching and learning.

It is also more important if the students and teachers or professors are

properly accommodated to facilitate the teaching and learning. School

Facilities include restrooms, library, computer room, laboratory,

basketball court, infirmary, gymnasium, auditorium, music room, art

room, and cafeteria. Schools should be equipped with the above-

mentioned facilities, in order to improve the students’ learning

To mention some good qualities of physical facilities, the school

should provide a well-lighted and well-ventilated rooms, a clean,