Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Achievement By the end of Year 4, students explain the role of local government and distinguish between rules and laws. They describe factors that
shape a person’s identity and sense of belonging.
Standard
Students pose questions about the society in which they live and use information to answer them. They suggest solutions to an
identified issue. They develop and present their ideas and opinions on an issue using civics and citizenship terms.
Government and Knowledge and Understandings Assessment For Learning - Engage - Review of why we have rules
Democracy The differences between ‘rules’ and ‘laws’ (ACHCK012) through discussion topics or silent walk.
Laws and Citizens Why laws are important (ACHCK013)
Citizenship, Skills
Pose questions about the society in which they live(ACHCS015) Assessment as Learning - Monitoring of students understanding
diversity and identity
Use information to develop a point of view (ACHCS017)
of the difference between rules and laws and what makes a good
Distinguish facts from opinions in relation to civics and
citizenship topics and issues (ACHCS016)
law.
Work in groups to identify issues, possible solutions and a plan
for action (ACHCS019)
Interact with others with respect, share views and recognise Assessment Of Learning - Completing checklist of what makes a
there are different points of view (ACHCS007) good law and assessing against own law.
Present ideas and opinions on civics and citizenship topics and
issues using civics and citizenship terms (ACHCS009)
Reflect on their cultural identity and how it might be similar and
different from others (ACHCS010)
Civics and Citizenship Skills Key Questions
Bands
Year 3 4 Band Questioning and Research What is the difference between rules and laws and why are they
Year 5 6 Band Analysis important?
Synthesis and Interpretation
Problem Solving and Decision Making
Communication and Reflections
General Capabilities
Engage Resources
Students report back to class on their scenario and the chain of consequences. The chain of consequences should show
negative effects. Ask students would these things happen really? Elicit idea that rules and laws stop people doing these
things. Go through each scenario and discuss who makes the rule in each scenario (i.e. school, parents, teachers, council,
referee).
● How do rules support our rights and responsibilities and help us live together safely, justly and well?
● Why do we need rules and why do we need to know what they are?
● How do we judge what is fair or not?
● Do rules have to be fair for everyone?
● How do people know what the rules are?
● When and why do rules change?
● Who should make the rules and why?
● What can happen if we do not follow rules?
Rules, rights, responsibilities, fairness, just, consequences, equality Assessment For Learning -
Civics and Citizenship Metalanguage Link Engage - Review of why we have
rules through discussion topics or
silent walk.
Reflection
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
General Capabilities
Explore Resources
End of Session: Reflect on what is the difference between a rule and a law?
Reflection
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
General Capabilities Critical and Creative Thinking, Personal Social Capability, Ethical Undertanding
rule, law, society, punishment, road rules/ road laws, consequences, senior, foreign, migrant, tourist, Assessment as Learning - can
Civics and Citizenship Metalanguage Link the students see differences
between rules and law?
Reflection
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Explain Resources
* Now get students to imagine laws. Is it fairer for only 1 person to know the laws or everyone? What might
happen to you if you don’t know the laws? Is it fair if a law only applies to a small group (e.g. only people with
blond hair need to do 60km/hr in town) Refer students back to laws they may be familiar with e.g. road laws. Why
are they fair? i.e. We all know them; they are the same for everyone. Discuss idea of equality.
Civics and Citizenship Metalanguage Assessment Opportunities
obey laws, breaking laws, fair laws, equality Assessment as Learning: monitor students
Civics and Citizenship Metalanguage Link ability to table in Activity 1: Can students
* identify some differences between rules and
laws
* Identify some differences in the
consequences of breaking rules and laws
supported by reasons.
Monitor discussion at end of Activity 2 - can
students identify that fairness means everyone
should know the rules?
Reflection
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Explain Resources
protest rally, system of law-making, unfair law-making, law changes Assessment as Learning
Civics and Citizenship Metalanguage Link - monitor students
understanding of what
makes a “good law”
Reflection
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Cross Curricular Priorities Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Histories and Cultures
Elaborate Resources
Reflection
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Explain Resources
* Outline the task. Groups should list possible topics they think need to be addressed in the school. They should then select the one
they agree is most relevant and write a proposed rule. Point out to students that a rule should be drafted in positive terms .ie. describing
what should occur. They should also outline the consequences of breaking the rule.
* Each group should select a spokesperson to introduce their rule. This person, called your 'Representative' has to introduce the new
rule for discussion. The representative:
● reads out the proposed rule and its consequence
● explains why the group thinks the new rule is necessary
● explains who it will affect and how.
* At the conclusion of the presentations the students have a chance to comment on the suggested rules.
* Reflect on how this process is similar/ different to flow chart displayed in “Making Laws in Australia” e.g. no election for
representatives; students given a chance to comment on rules as if they were parliament but no vote. (please note this activity is re-
done and extended next lesson)
Civics and Citizenship Metalanguage Assessment
Opportunities
Parliament, representatives, elections, citizens over 18, voters, bill, governor-general, majority rules Assessment as Learning
Civics and Citizenship Metalanguage Link - monitor students
ability to answer review
questions.
Reflection
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
General Capabilities Ethical Understanding, Personal and Social Capability, Critical and Creative Thinking
Evaluate Resources
Students put their ideas in a table such as below. This should be done individually as per assessment task sheet.
Reflection
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
General Capabilities
Reflection
Unit 2: “CLASS LAW”
Assessment Task
Student Name:
Year Level: 4
Name of Task: Class Law
Teacher:
Learning Area/s: Civics and Citizenship
Assessed By:
Date Commenced: Date Due:
Task Description
Students are to list ideas on what makes a good law in a table. Students are then to decide
whether the “law” trialled in class meets the criterion for a good law and to give reasons why or
why not and how it could be improved.
A B C D E
Knowledge and You are able to You are able to You are able to You are able to Significant support is
demonstrate a very high demonstrate a high demonstrate an demonstrate a limited or required for you to
Understanding understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the confused understanding demonstrate
difference between a rule difference between a rule difference between a rule of the difference between understanding of the
and law. and law. and law. a rule and law. difference between a rule
and law
You can identify what You can identify what You can identify what You can only provide a You can not
makes a “good law” with makes a “good law” with makes a “good law”, limited answer on what independently provide an
details, demonstrating a some detail, demonstrating a sound makes a “good law”. explanation of what
very high level of demonstrating a high understanding. makes a “good law”.
understanding. understanding.
Skills You provided an opinion You provided an opinion You provided a reasoned You provided an opinion You provided an opinion
on whether our class law on whether our class law opinion on whether our on whether our class was on whether our class was
was good or not with a was good or not with at class law was good or not good or not but needed good or not without
number of detailed least two detailed reasons (including using some of teacher support to list listing any reasons.
reasons that show a very why/ why not (including the metalanguage learnt your reasons why or why
high level of using the metalanguage in this unit). not.
understanding (including learnt in this unit).
using the metalanguage
learnt in this unit.)
You were able to list You were able to list You were able to list at You were able to list You were not able to list a
possible solutions to possible solutions to least one possible possible solutions to solution to improve our
improve our class law improve our class law solution to improve our improve our class law class law.
with details that show a with some detail. class law. with teacher support.
very high level of
understanding.
Planning for Differently Abled Students
Student/s Different Ability Australian Curriculum Learning and Teaching Strategies Assessment Strategies
Content Descriptions
being addressed