Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

Critical Analysis Dissertation Assessment

Instructions: Please fill in all yellow boxes. Put one X in each attribute row to indicate grade. Marks are calculated for you in blue
boxes. Upload completed mark sheet to SurreyLearn, module PHYM021 Research Project and Dissertation. DO NOT PUBLISH!

Solid piece of work presented in a professional way. It must show evidence of initiative as well as industriousness. Depending on the
Distinction ³70%
choice of topic, it may well be of publishable quality or useful to an outside client.
Merit 60-69% Worthwhile, solid work which would need further effort, more originality or better presentation to meet the criteria of a Distinction.

Pass 50-59% Work which is useful, worthy of a pass, but lacking inspiration.
Flawed work or results presented with little appreciation of their significance (or lack of significance). Barely sufficient time and effort
Fail 40-49%
made by the student, and may have depended greatly on the efforts of others.
Bad fail <40% Little achieved; the student was confused and the report confusing. The student did not achieve anything worthwhile.

STUDENT
DISSERTATION TITLE
ASSESSOR
10 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
exceptionally good
virtually flawless

virtually absent
inadequate
insufficient
very good

very poor
sufficient

omitted
perfect

good
Assessment of the dissertation
weight mark
Introduction 10 x 6.00
Main body of the review 40 x 24.00
Discussion/conclusions 15 x 9.00
References 15 x 9.00
Selectivity/presentation/style 20 x 12.00
100
TOTAL MARK 60.0 %

Feedback for the student: Please comment on the literature review sissertation and elaborate on any exceptional marks in any category (outside the range 5-8).