Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Received November 13, 2000; accepted May 25, 2001; published online August 16, 2001
and the Debye parameter κ. Several investigators (29, 30) Interfacial tensions. Equilibrium dynamic interfacial ten-
have suggested that the zeta potential (ζ ), determined by sion measurements were made using the spinning drop ten-
electrophoretic measurements, is approximately equal to the siometer (University of Texas, Model 500) and the procedure
interfacial potential, ψs . Thus, the values of the zeta potential, of Cayias et al. (31). Glass sample tubes with a length of 10 cm
determined for our bitumen-in-water emulsions, were used in and an internal diameter of 4 mm were used. The oil-drop volume
place of ψs in Eq. [3]. The values of κ were calculated using used was 3 µl, dispensed using a 50-µl Hamilton syringe into
the expression the glass sample tube containing the aqueous solution. The tube
was placed in the instrument and accelerated at 6000 rpm. Mea-
κ = (2n 0 v 2 e2 /εr ε0 kT )1/2 , [4] surements were carried out at 25.0 ± 0.1◦ C. The oil drop was a
solution of 90% (w/w) bitumen in xylene. The aqueous phases
were solutions of lithium, sodium, or potassium carbonates in
where n 0 is the number of ions of each type per volume unit of
water, at different concentrations. Using aqueous solutions of
bulk phase, v is the magnitude of the valence of the ions, e is
lithium, sodium, or potassium carbonates, the effect of the ionic
the electron charge, εr is the relative permittivity of the solution
radius of the cation on the interfacial tension can be determined.
phase and ε0 of free space, k is the Boltzman constant, and T
The interfacial tension at the interface, pure xylem/water, did
is the absolute temperature.
not change with the carbonate concentration in the aqueous
In our analysis, the contribution of the short-range interaction
phase. This indicates that the variations of interfacial tensions,
energies will be briefly mentioned during the discussion of the
observed at the interface, bitumen solution in xylem/carbonate
experiments results.
aqueous solutions, should be attributed only to the presence of
natural surfactants (NS) in the bitumen.
EXPERIMENTAL
Emulsions preparation. Emulsions of Cerro Negro bitu-
men in water, stabilized with natural surfactants, were prepared
Materials. In this study, Cerro Negro bitumen, from the
at 60◦ C. At 30◦ C this bitumen has a viscosity in excess of
Orinoco Basin in Venezuela, was used. This bitumen has an
100 mPa s. Natural surfactants were activated by adding dif-
API gravity of 8.5, a viscosity of 105 mPa s at 25◦ C, and an acid
ferent concentrations (ranging between 1000 and 15,000 ppm)
number of 3.7 mg of KOH/g. Alkaline solutions were prepared
of sodium carbonate to the aqueous phase of emulsions.
by dissolving in double-distilled water the required quantities
Emulsions were prepared following the “high internal phase
of lithium, sodium, or potassium carbonates (analytical-grade
ratio” (HIPR) method developed by Chirinos et al. (32), which
reagents). The alkaline solutions of carbonate salts were chosen
requires initial dispersion to be carried out at packing fractions
because they produce a buffer solution, which is able to keep the
greater than the critical. This facilitates the formation of highly
pH practically constant at around 11.3 ± 0.3 over a wide range
concentrated emulsions, with a very narrow droplet diameter dis-
of carbonate concentrations (Fig. 2). If the pH remains constant,
tribution. According to this method, a mixture of bitumen and
the system can be better controlled. For interfacial tension exper-
an alkaline water solution (alkalinized with sodium carbonate),
iments, it was necessary to dilute the bitumen with 10% (w/w)
containing a volume fraction of bitumen of 0.90, was stirred for
of analytical-grade xylem, since the density of bitumen was very
several minutes using a Rushton paddle-equipped mixer until
close to that of the water alkaline solutions.
a constant mean droplet size was obtained. During the homog-
enization process, the mixing vessel was immersed in a 60◦ C
water bath. The modest shaft speed and high mixture viscosity
resulted in mixing conditions that posed no risk of air entrap-
ment. Furthermore, emulsions were diluted with the aqueous
phase to obtain final bitumen volume fractions of 0.70.
After preparation, emulsions were stored at 25◦ C in sealed
containers and analyzed for mean droplet diameter and distribu-
tions, using an instrument based on a light diffraction technique
(Malvern, Model Master Seizer). These measurements allow
monitoring of emulsion stability.
Emulsion viscosity. Viscosity (η) and shear stress (τ ), as
a function of shear rate (γ ), were obtained using a Haake–
Rotovisco rotational viscometer (RV-20) provided with concen-
tric cylinders type MV1.
Electrophoretic mobility. Electropheretic mobilities were
FIG. 2. pH of an aqueous solution as a function of the sodium carbonate determined using a Rank Mark II microelectrophoresis appa-
concentration. ratus (Rank Brothers, Cambridge, England). One part of each
BITUMEN IN WATER EMULSIONS 233
K a = [A− −
w ][H3 O ]/[HAw ]. [8]
A− −
w ⇔ As , [9]
K s = [A− −
s ]/[Aw ]. [10]
A− +
w + Na ⇔ ANa, [11]
well known (5, 10). Since the bitumen contains a mixture of K p = 1/[A− +
w ][Na ]. [12]
carboxylic acids, with different molecular structures and molec-
ular weights (6), a fraction of the carboxylate ions remain ad- All those equilibria are affected by the water ionization
sorbed at the interface, while the rest diffuse to the aqueous
phase. 2H2 O ⇔ H3 O+ + OH− [13]
As the concentration of Na2 CO3 increases, the pH of the aque-
ous phase tends to remain constant, but the concentration of Na+
and its constant K w , or the ionic product of water, given by
increases. This increase in Na+ concentration makes the car-
boxylate ions, dissolved in the aqueous phase, more and more
K w = [H3 O+ ][OH−]. [14]
hydrophobic, promoting its diffusion and adsorption at the in-
terface, with a consequent decrease in the interfacial tension. A
The total concentration of carboxylic acids in the system is given
point is reached (between 700 and 2000 ppm sodium carbonate)
by the following mass balance:
where ultralow interfacial tensions were detected. Further in-
creases in the Na2 CO3 concentration introduce into the system
[HAo ] = [HAw ] + [A− −
w ] + [As ] + [ANa]. [15]
the required Na+ concentration to promote the formation of in-
soluble sodium carboxylate salts (NaA). Under these conditions
Rearrangement of Eq. [15], with the use of the equilibrium re-
the interfacial tension increases.
lationships, yields the following equation:
The interfacial behavior discussed above could be better un-
derstood using a simple model, deducted from the system chem-
istry shown in Fig. 5. Thus, there are the following: [A− − −
s ] = [Aw ](K w /K a K d [OH ]) −[NaA]. [16]
Partitioning of the carboxylic acids (H A) between the bitumen If the pH of the aqueous phase remains constant, Eq. [16] can
and the aqueous sublayer, be rewritten as
with a partition coefficient, K p , defined as According to Eq. [17], the concentration of carboxylate ions ad-
sorbed at the interface decreases as the concentration of sodium
K p = [HAw ]/[HAo ]. [6] carboxylate (NaA) increases. There is a critical Na+ concen-
tration, given by Eq. [12], at which the precipitation of sodium
Dissociation of the carboxylic acid at the aqueous side of the carboxylate (NaA) starts. Once the NaA starts to precipitate, the
interface according to the reaction excess of Na+ added to the aqueous phase only contributes to
the removal of the carboxylate ions adsorbed at the interface
HAw + H2 O ⇔ A− −
w + H3 O , [7] by the formation of more and more ANa. Consequently, as was
BITUMEN IN WATER EMULSIONS 235
HAw + OH− ⇔ A−
w + H2 O [20]
A−
w ⇔ A−
s [21]
TABLE 2 TABLE 3
Total Interaction Energy (UT ) at Two Distances of Separation Interfacial Viscosity, at 25.0 ± 0.1◦ C, in Surface Poise (s.p), for
(H) between Droplets as a Function of the Sodium Carbonate the Bitumen/Water system as a Function of the Sodium Carbonate
Concentration in the Aqueous Phase Concentration (a) in the Absence of NaCl and (b) in the Presence
of 5000 ppm NaCl
UT (J m−2 × 103 ) at
Concentration of
Interfacial viscosity (s.p)
Emulsion Na2 CO3 (ppm) H = 1.5(1/κ) m H = 2(1/κ) m Concentration of
Na2 CO3 (ppm) (a) (b)
1 2000 1.2 0.8
2 3000 0.9 0.7 3000 0.2 1.6
3 4000 0.8 0.6 5000 0.4 2.0
4 6000 0.7 0.5 6000 0.8 1.0
5 8000 0.3 0.2 8000 1.0 0.7
10,000 0.8 0.4
FIG. 10. Total energy of interaction between droplets in bitumen in water FIG. 11. Viscosity at 30◦ C and 20 s−1 for bitumen in water emulsions, as
emulsions containing different concentrations of sodium carbonate. a function of sodium carbonate and sodium chloride concentration.
238 ACEVEDO, GUTIERREZ, AND RIVAS
can easily overcome this barrier and flocculate in the primary 6. Acevedo, S., Escobar, G., Gutierrez, L., and Rivas, H., Fuel 71, 619
minimum. The situation is even more clear in emulsions (1992).
stabilized with 10,000 ppm of Na2 CO3 ; the very high values 7. Strassner, H. E., J. Pet. Technol. 20, 203 (1968).
8. Eley, D. D., Hey, M. J., and Lee, M. A., Colloid Surf. 24, 173 (1987).
of viscosity observed in these emulsions indicate that definitely
9. Chan, M., and Yen, T. F., Can. J. Chem. Eng. 60, 305 (1982).
bitumen droplets flocculated in the primary minimum. These 10. Rudin, J., and Wasan, D. T., Colloids Surf. 68, 67 (1992).
results suggest that emulsions containing more than 8000 ppm 11. Baviére, M., and Canselier, J. P., in “Surfactant Science Series” (C. Solans
Na2 CO3 are stabilized by short-range repulsive forces. A and H. Kunieda, Eds.), Vol. 66, p. 331. Dekker, New York, 1997.
similar situation was observed in the emulsions prepared in the 12. McCaffery, F. G., J. Can. Pet. Technol. 15(1), 71 (1976).
presence of NaCl; all of them showed higher viscosity values 13. Pascuarelli, C. H., and Wasan, D. T., in “Surface Phenomena in Enhanced
Oil Recovery” ( D. O. Shah, Ed.), p. 237. Plenum, New York, 1981.
than the emulsions formed in the absence of NaCl (Fig. 11).
14. Rudin, J., and Wasan, D. T., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 31(8), 1899 (1992).
15. Layrisse, I., Rivas, H., Quintero, L., Rivero, M., and Martinez, A., “Proc.
CONCLUSIONS Fourth UNITAR/UNDP Int. Conference on Heavy Crude and Tar Sands.
Edmonton, Canada, 1988,” paper no. 179.
We study in detail the interfacial properties of the natural 16. Nuñez, G., Briceño, M., Mata, C., and Rivas, H., J. Rheol. 40(3), 405 (1996).
surfactants present in the Cerro Negro bitumen from the Orinoco 17. Derjaguin, B. V., and Kussakov, M. M., Acta Physicochim. URSS 10, 25
Belt in Venezuela. It was found that the interfacial tension of (1939).
18. Derjaguin, B. V., and Landau, L. D., Acta Physicochim. URSS 14, 633
the bitumen/water system is very much affected by the Na2 CO3
(1941).
concentration in the aqueous phase. Thus, the interfacial 19. Verwey, E. J. W., and Overbeek, Th. G., “Theory of Stability of Lyophilic
tension decreases with the Na2 CO3 concentration until ultra Colloids.” Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1948.
low values are reached in the range of concentrations between 20. Israelachvill, J., “Intermolecular and Surface Forces,” 2nd ed. Academic
800 and 2000 ppm. Further increases in the sodium carbonate Press, London, 1991.
concentration promoted an increase in the interfacial tension. 21. Derjaguin, B. V., “Theory of Stability of Colloids and Thin Films.” Con-
sultants Bureau/Plenum, New York, 1989.
At any concentration of Na2 CO3 , the interfacial tension was
22. Ruckenstein, E., and Bhakta, A., Langmuir 12(17), 4134 (1996).
lower when 5000 ppm NaCl was added to the aqueous phase. 23. Hunter, R. J., “Foundations of Colloid Science,” Vols. I and II. Oxford Univ.
The properties of the bitumen-in-water emulsions stabilized Press, New York, 1986.
by natural surfactants were also studied. Stable emulsions were 24. Lifshitz, E. M., Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 73 (1956).
prepared in the range of Na2 CO3 concentrations, in the aqueous 25. Mahanty, J., and Ninham, B. W., “Dispersion Forces.” Academic Press,
phase, between 2000 and 10,000 ppm. The mean droplet London, 1976.
26. Buscall, R., and Ottewill, R. H., in “Polymer Colloids”(R. Buscall,
diameter of the emulsions decreased as the sodium carbonate
T. Orner, and J. Stageman, Eds.), p. 141. Elsevier, London, 1985.
concentration in the system increased. No variation in the mean 27. Hogg, R., Healy, T. H., and Fuerstenau, D. W., Trans. Faraday Soc. 62,
droplet diameter was observed during the experiment (more 1638 (1966).
than 30 days), which means that the emulsions were highly sta- 28. Overbeek, Th. G., Colloids Surf. 51, 61 (1990).
ble against coalescence. With the zeta potential values obtained 29. Hunter, R. J., “Zeta Potential in Colloid Science.” Academic Press,
through electrophoretic experiments, the electrostatic repulsion New York, 1981.
30. Ottewill, R. H., in “Solid/Liquid Dispersions” (Th. F. Tadros, Ed.), p. 183.
potentials among droplets were calculated. The results indicate Academic Press, London, 1987.
that emulsions containing up to 6000 ppm sodium carbonate 31. Cayias, J. L., Schechter, R. S., and Wade, W. H., in “The Measurement of
were stabilized by double-layer repulsion interactions; how- Interfacial Tension via the Spinning Drop Technique,” ACS Symposium 8,
ever, those emulsions containing 8000 and 10,000 ppm sodium pp. 234–247. Am. Chem. Soc. Washington, D.C., 1975.
carbonate were probably stabilized by short-range interaction 32. Chirinos, M. L., Taylor, A. S., and Taylor, S. E., “Preparation of HIPR
Emulsions and Transportation Thereof,” U.S. Patent 9,934,398, 1990.
forces, as deduced from the measured viscosity values. 33. Rivas, H., Gutierrez, X., Zirit, J. L., Anton, R., Salger, J. L., in ‘Surfactant
Science Series’ (C. Solans and H. Kunieda, Eds.),Vol. 66, p. 305. Dekker,
REFERENCES New York,1997.
34. Miñana, M., Jarry, P., Perez-Sanchez, M., Ramirez-Gouveia, M., and
1. Reisber, J., and Doscher, T. M., Prod. Mon. 21, 46 (1956). Salager, J. L., J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 7, 331 (1986).
2. Marquez, H., Rivas, H., Layrisee, I., Acevedo, S., Escobar, G., Gutierrez, L., 35. Rudin, J., and Wasan, D. T., Chem. Eng. Sci. 48(12), 2225 (1993).
Leon, D., Silva, M., and Merchiona, R., Rev. Tec. INTEVEP 7(2), 117 36. Isaacs, E. E, and Smolek, K. F. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 233–240 (1983).
(1987). Rodriguez, P. Jimenez, E., Izaguirre, M., Salazar, J., Carrizo, R., and
3. Babu, D. R., Hornof, V., and Neale, G., Can. J. Chem. Eng. 62, 156 (1984). Alcantara, J., Rev. Tec. INTEVEP 7(1), 17–32 (1987).
4. Seifet, K. W., and Howells, W. G., Anal. Chem. 41, 554 (1969). 37. Rivas, H., Socrates, A., and Gutierrez, X., U.S. Patent 5,556,574, 1996.
5. Acevedo, S., Layrisse, I., and Rivas, H., J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 5, 1 38. Rivas, H., Gutierrez, X., Cardenas, A., and Morles, A., U.S. Patent
(1985). 5,792,223, 1998.