Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
There are three main points that I want to state briefly. First,
something by way of background material on the resurrection of
the Lord Jesus Christ. The resurrection was a fulfillment of Old
Testament prophecy. There are many verses in the New Testament
that point to Old Testament prophecies. I would like to take two
passages from the book of Acts, however, just to illustrate how in
the New Testament the disciples in the early church looked upon
the resurrection of Jesus Christ as a fulfillment of many of the
verses of the Old Testament, verses that had to do with the Old
Testament Messiah.
The third point that I want to bring out in this lecture that has
to do with background material on the resurrection of the Lord
Jesus Christ is that the resurrection of our Savior is declared in
the New Testament to be of vital importance. First of all, it is of
vital importance concerning our salvation. We have Peter, for
example, in 1 Peter 1:3 stating, “Blessed be the God and Father
of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy
hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection
of Jesus Christ from the dead.” Here Peter is attributing almost
everything in the Christian life to the reality of the resurrection.
The last point that I want to bring out here, point number 9
concerning the importance of the resurrection for the New
Testament, is found in Philippians 3:10, as well as many other
passages in the New Testament. This shows that the New Testament
believers, the New Testament itself, looked upon the resurrection
as a provision for the grace and the power of God in the Christian
life. Paul in Philippians 3:10 said, “That I might know him, and
the power of his resurrection.” This was vitally important for the
apostle Paul. Paul not only believed in the resurrection but also
believed that the resurrection was a source of great help for the
grace and the power of God in one’s daily life. This, of course, is
the key to the sixth, seventh, and eighth chapters of the book of
Romans: to understand that we have not only died in Christ but
also have been resurrected together with Him.
Here are nine evidences now from the New Testament to point
out how important it was for the early church to believe in the
resurrection, and they surely did that.
The second main point in this ninth lecture raises the question
concerning the nature of the resurrection. What kind of a
resurrection was it? A good deal can be said about this, but I want
to be simple and brief here. I have three points under this area.
First of all, when you ask about the nature of the resurrection, the
New Testament comes back with the answer that it was a historical
resurrection. The many verses that I just referred to, together
with the description of the resurrection itself and the events
surrounding it as given in the Gospels, all serve to emphasize
that the raising of Christ from the dead was a transaction that
happened in time and in space in history. Surely we find that in
the New Testament. The apostle Paul, when he was before those
great leaders Agrippa and Festus in Acts 26:26, boldly made the
statement about the resurrection, “This thing was not done in a
corner.” What a statement to make. If the resurrection was only a
symbol back in those days, if the resurrection was only a symbol of
religious truth, if Christ did not come out of the grave, how could
the apostle Paul, an early convert to Christianity right in the very
day when the resurrection could have been proven false, have
boldly stood before these two important leaders, King Agrippa
and Festus, and make this statement about the resurrection “that
this thing was not done in a corner”? We understand now from
this that the resurrection is historical.
Third, when we ask about the nature of the resurrection from the
New Testament, the answer comes back it was a representative
resurrection. The Lord Jesus Christ was raised from the dead
as our representative. His resurrection was the first step in His
glorification. We’ve already seen in this lecture series that He
came into the world as our representative. He lived and died
as our representative, as we understand from Romans 5 and
Galatians 4, and now we recognize that He arose from the dead
as our representative. No wonder Paul states in Ephesians 2:5–
6, “Even when we were dead in sins, [God] hath quickened us
together with Christ . . . and hath raised us up together.” Yes,
Christ’s resurrection was a representative act in history, and all
believers not only lived in Christ, not only died in Christ, but also
were raised from the grave in the mind and the eye of God in the
resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The third main point in this ninth lecture has to do with the
evidence for the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. What
evidence do we have? What kind of evidence can be stated? Is
Christianity only a group of myths and legends? No, not at all.
The first evidence is an empirical one. If you lived in that day, you
could go and look at the empty tomb. The tomb was empty. The
gospel record is emphatic on this point. All four of the gospels
plainly and boldly make the statement that the tomb where the
Lord Jesus Christ’s body was laid was empty. The twenty-eighth
chapter of Matthew and the sixth verse makes that statement.
Mark 16:6, Luke 24:3–6, and John 20:1–2 all affirm that the tomb
was empty.
Now how can a person account for the empty tomb if Christ did
not rise from the dead? His friends could not steal the body. It
was sealed with the Roman seal and the Roman guards stood at
the door of the tomb. His enemies were determined to prove that
He was dead. They wanted the body in the tomb. Now how can
one account for the empty tomb if there is no resurrection of the
Lord Jesus Christ from the dead? It has been well written that
there is no hint anywhere in the New Testament that the fact of
the empty tomb was ever question by either friend or foe. Had
the body of Jesus never left the tomb, the Pharisees would have
thrown the tomb open for inspection and invited the dukes of
this new heresy to see for themselves the body of Jesus still lying
where it was buried. Had the disciples believed in only a spiritual
resurrection as held by some present-day liberals, the tomb in
which His body lay would have become a shrine for those pilgrims
who always frequent the tombs of great or well-beloved persons.
The strange indifference of the early church to the tomb of Jesus
finds a simple explanation in the fact that the body was not there.
The fact that the apostles preached the resurrection in the very
city where Jesus died and was buried is presumptive evidence in
favor of this great miracle.
This is a quotation from that fine little book, The Case for the
Resurrection of Jesus Christ, by Chester E. Tulga [Chicago, IL:
Conservative Baptist Fellowship, 1951].
The second evidence for the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ
from the grave is the evidence of the grave clothes. We recognize
from John 20:3–8 that the grave clothes were an evidence to Peter
and John of the reality of the resurrection. These two men, when
they heard the message that Christ’s body was not in the tomb,
ran to the tomb and looked in. The linen clothes which had been
wound about the body of the Lord Jesus were still in that shape,
but it was now empty. It was sort of a mummified or cocoon
shape, but empty. The same is true of the napkin which had been
wound about the head of the Lord Jesus Christ. Christ had simply
passed through the grave clothes as He was to later pass through
The next one is the observance of the Lord’s Day. God had
instructed the Jewish people to worship Him on Saturday, the
Sabbath, but in the New Testament following the resurrection,
we find the disciples worshiping God with other Christians on the
Lord’s Day (Acts 20:7; 1 Corinthians 16; Revelation 1). How do we
account for this change? It was the resurrection. The Lord Jesus
arose from the grave on Sunday, He appeared to the disciples on
that first Sunday, and the following Sundays, and Sunday became
known as the Lord’s Day.