Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Traditionally, the term "international conflict" referred to conflicts between different nation-
states and conflicts between people and organizations in different nation-states. The cause of
conflict can result from a combination of the following factors: We also know that a key issue is
how conflict is handled. Disputants may practice denial and avoidance, may continue an acrimonious
ongoing argument, or resort to either violence or litigation. For example, teens may get into fights that
could escalate from words to fists to weapons. Divorcing couples may be drawn into bitter long-term
legal battles over child custody and support or division of marital property. Parents of a learning-
disabled child may be drawn into a conflict with a school system over education for their child. Workers
and management, environmental activists and developers, neighbors, community groups, and
governments, as well as ethnic groups and nations may find their interests at odds and find themselves
in the role of opponents in a conflict.
Human rights violations during the Syrian Civil War electroshocking the genetilia and many
more painful and inhumanly ways that these so called soldiers used. Making it worse on these
innocent people, it was hard for them to leave or run away, until they were ordered to. It was
hard for them to seek medical or psychological attention in their own country; even if they fled
to neighboring countries it
was hard, from fear, especially fear of “honor” and shame. Women that are married are later on
looked down at by their husbands and are treated differently.
CONCLUSION
Mediation, as used in law, is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), a way of resolving disputes
between two or more parties with concrete effects. Typically, a third party, the mediator, assists the
parties to negotiate a settlement. Disputants may mediate disputes in a variety of domains, such as
commercial, legal, diplomatic, workplace, community and family matters. In mediation the parties
control:
This article is not just an exercise in exegesis. We believe that the fields of human rights and
conflict resolution are interdependent, that they must operate in a complementary fashion, and
that they have much to learn from one another. This is not to suggest that the two fields should
merge. To the contrary, their greatest strength lies in the fact that they are separate, that they
address the problems of violent conflict from different perspectives. But professionals in these
two fields need to understand one another and learn to work better together. Where violent
conflicts or massive violations of human rights are occurring, all interveners are likely to feel
pressure to act urgently to reduce the likelihood of continuing bloodshed or abuse; to react to
events rather than to anticipate them; and to be impatient with those whose aims or philosophies
diverge from their own. These are poor circumstances in which one might try to foster better
interdisciplinary communication and cooperation to achieve common goals.