Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
III-8 BSSE
There are instances or cases when there is only an act of possession without
the title of ownership but ownership will always have an act of possession, whether actual
or constructive. The act of possession cannot be the same as ownership. Why? Simply
because the possessor is only a holder of a property. The possessor may hold a property
and have the right to enjoy and keep the property. An owner has the additional rights to
dispose and abuse his property, rights that do not belong to a mere possessor.
How do these two things exists in one scenario? For example, I own a pen
(that is ownership) and someone borrows my pen, I hand it over to them (now, it is in
their possession) anytime, I can take my pen back because I own it; I can exercise the
right of action against the holder of my pen to retrieve it.
bedspacer. The landlord owns the dormitory and through renting, the bedspacer may
possess the room. The landlord is the owner but in a moment, the bedspacer possesses the
property of the landlord.
So, is ownership and possession synonymous? Not exactly but they have
relation to each other. Possession has two concepts - the owner that exercises the act of
ownership and the holder that exercises the act of possessing where the possessor have
the right to keep it. Possession may be put in this way, you possess a property through
ownership and/or you possess a property through mere possession per se.