Data No. 1 a. H0= There is no correlation between the weight and glucose of the patients. Hα= There is a correlation between the weight and glucose of the patients. b. Level of significance: α=0. 05 c. Test statistics: t-statistic d. Critical Region: If p-value is less than α, reject H0. If p-value is greater than α, do not reject H0. e. Stata Output: f. Statistical Decision: Since p-value is greater than α=0. 05, we accept the H0. g. Conclusion: Thus, weight and glucose of the patients have no linear correlation. A. What is the predicted glucose level for a man who weighs 95 kg? GIVEN: Β1= 0. 51 Β0= 61. 88 X= 95 kg Yglucose = ? SOLUTION: Y = Β1X + Β0 Y = 0. 51(95) + 61. 88 Y = 110.33 mg/100mL Data No.2 Alpha = 0. 05 a. Null Hypo= There is no correlation or linear relationship between IgE and Skin test Alternative Hypo = There is correlation/ linear relationship between IgE and Skin Test b. Level of significance: alpha= 0. 05 c. Test statistics: T-statistics d. Critical Region: If p-value is less than alpha, reject null hypothesis. If p-value is greater than alpha, do not reject null hypothesis e. Stata Output:  f. Statistical Decision: P-value of 0. 0973 is greater than alpha of 0. 05, do not reject null hypothesis. g. Conclusion: Thus, Ig E and Skin Test do not have linear relationship. h. Linear2regression between variables. model and interpretation: Not applicable, there is no relationship Data No.3 Alpha = 0. 05 a. Null Hypo= There is no correlation or linear relationship between Dosage and AZT Concentration Alternative Hypo = There is correlation/ linear relationship between Dosage and AZT Concentration b. Level of significance: alpha= 0. 05 c. Test statistics: T-statistics d. Critical Region: If p-value is less than alpha, reject null hypothesis. If p-value is greater than alpha, do not reject null hypothesis e. Stata Output:  f. Statistical Decision: P-value of 0. 0000 is less than the alpha of 0. 05, reject null hypothesis. g. Conclusion: dosage is a goodThus, species). Dosage predictor and Concentration of AZT AZT Concentration have among a strong maternal linear and fetalrelationship, baboon (Papioi. e. h. Linear Regression model and interpretation: R-squared= 0. 7213 = 72. 13% 72. 13% of the total variability in AZT Concentration can be explained by dosage. In every unit increase in dosage there is a 0. 0022 ng/mL increase in AZT Concentration.