PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

GENERAL RULES
1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Second Mastery Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapters 2 and 3 (Review of Related Literature and Research Methodology) will be your
Second Mastery Examination composed of different areas.
3. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below. In this case, whatever is the grade in each
area will automatically be the score of the research moderator with the approval of the associates.
4. Remember, areas 1- in Chapters 2 and 3 will be considered WRITTEN WORKS.
5. The research moderator will rate his/her associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The moderator MUST see
to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research
associates to avoid biases/personal gains but subject to the assessment of the research instructor based on the
participation of the all members in the team. Therefore, the instructor has the full authority to change the score.
6. ONLY Area 6 that all researchers share the same score.
7. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
8. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions
and recommendations by your research instructor.
9. Submit your output on or before October 2, 2017. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY. Late submission is a
deduction of 10 points every single day
10. The class president shall submit all the outputs to the instructor and be placed using the expanded envelop
submitted previously.
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area Area Area Area Area Area Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 Score
Research Moderator

Asst. Moderator

Research Associate

Research Associate

Research Associate

Research Associate

Strand and Section: _________________________

STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT
We, hereby affix our signature as a proof of agreement and consensus on the validity of the scores given
following the due process and system of scoring. (Please affix your signature over printed name)

__________________________________ _________________________________ _______________________________

__________________________________ _________________________________ _______________________________

1|Page
 RESEARCH TITLE
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

RUBRICS FOR SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

Excellent (30-27 points): Good: (26-23 points): Average: (22-18 points): Below Average (17 points
Excellent to superior work in all Good to fair work in most Passing work, but in serious below):
areas as indicated in the aspects; minor deficiency in need of improvement in many Confusing, lacks explanation or
instructors’ written relation to instructors’ written areas, especially in regard to completion; little conforming to
expectations; exemplary expectations regarding content, form and content; minimal instructors’ written
performance, participation, writing style or procedures; grasp of facts, analysis and expectations regarding content,
creativity and writing; fully adequate grasp of facts, application; very few clear writing style or procedures;
addresses the criterion; analysis, and practical statements or explanations overall, below professional
excellent grasp of facts, application; clear statements quality standards; not quality
analysis and application; and explanations are limited, work
consistently clear statements but above average quality
and explanations
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)
The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different
techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable
under study.
Research Design. (Area 2)
Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers
following the content in each area.
Research Setting/Locale.
The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized
manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.
Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 3)
The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the
participants are fit to the study.
Research Instrument/s.
This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.
Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 4)
Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting
necessary information needed in the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 5)
The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study
design and method; therefore, providing an accurate results of the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 6)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.
General Comments:
_______/180

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT

Research Lecturer

2|Page