Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
NIFTY OUTPERFORMERS
Price % YTD % 1 YR
Tech Mahindra Ltd 711 41.1 82.2
Titan Co Ltd 904 5.3 75.1
Bajaj Finance Ltd 2,272 29.3 61.1
Tata Consultancy Svcs Ltd 1,868 38.3 55.7
Hindustan Unilever Ltd 1,630 19.2 49.3
NIFTY UNDERPERFORMERS
Price % YTD % 1 YR
Tata Motors Ltd 303 (29.9) (33.5)
Bharti Infratel Ltd 292 (22.9) (22.2)
Lupin Ltd 911 2.9 (19.5)
Upl Ltd 700 (8.2) (19.2)
Indian Oil Corp Ltd 171 (12.2) (15.7)
We are in the middle of a ‘Bad macro-Good micro’ phase with earnings growth bouncing off a low base and due to the lag effects of a good
macro cycle between 2015-18. While CY18 earnings may not be at risk due to this, we believe that, with the lead indicators deteriorating over STRATEGY
the past six-eight months on commodity prices, inflation, interest rates, current & capital account challenges and fiscal pangs to growth, the 18 June 2018
risks to CY19/FY20 earnings have risen. While the market is beginning to price it in terms of multiples compression, earnings estimates for
the ensuing 12-24 month period are still building in a blue sky scenario. We sequence the likely trajectory -
BSE Sensex 35,622
Phase 1 – Sep-Dec’17 saw commodity prices go up, interest rates rise and the twin deficit challenges begin.
Phase 2 – March quarter of FY18 results showed margin pressures due to higher commodity prices and rupee depreciation. NSE Nifty 10,817
Phase 3 – Apr-Jun’ 18 has seen companies take price hikes. Behaviorally, companies tend to anticipate further cost inflation in taking price hikes. 20%
This increases inflationary risks. Interest rates and central bank policy rates go up. Margins in the ensuing 2 quarters can bounce back.
15%
Phase 4 – Oct’18-Mar’19 - Will demand sustain inspite of higher prices? This should be the key testing ground. Street’s earnings estimates for
CY19 are baking in margin AND demand stability implying value growth, volume growth and operating leverage. That’s the key risk we see. 10%
Phase 5 - Our call is that volume growth and/or margin assumptions for CY19 should then moderate as customer behavior should change 5%
reacting to interest rates, currency movements and fiscal spend. Also, working capital cycle should elongate and cash generation weaken. 0%
This boils down to pricing power. Very few companies have a time tested track record of demonstrated pricing power, underlying robust -5%
business model, strong shock absorbers and a solid governance structure to deliver consistent performance irrespective of cycles and
Aug-17
Sep-17
Feb-18
Apr-18
May-18
Jun-17
Jun-18
Jul-17
Nov-17
Dec-17
Jan-18
Mar-18
Oct-17
headwinds. We identified a few in our earlier note titled ‘Identifying The Best “All Weather” Managements’.
In this note, we are creating a framework to identify companies, within each sector, which are, in our opinion, most and least vulnerable for Sensex BSE 200
the volume and/ or margins risks as well as multiples de-rating risks that we assess.
Where are the landmines? Performance (%)
• Cyclically boosted gross margins and EBITDA margins (or Net Interest Margins) due to low input prices, benign wage/ lease rental/ logistics 1m 3m 12m
cost environment and a strong rupee over FY15-FY18. Companies with weak pricing power in a competitive B2B business or Govt. contracts
Sensex -0.4% 3.0% 11.9%
can see mean reversion on margins and stretched working capital.
BSE200 0.2% 5.2% 14.5%
• Operating & Financial de-leverage – High fixed cost businesses, financially levered (measured by Debt/ Operating cashflows) show the
highest sensitivity to profit estimates for even a 2% lesser revenues. RESEARCH ANALYSTS
• High growth, rather than high quality, led top decile P/E or EV/ EBITDA valuations esp. ones with weak cashflow profiles to support it are the VIJAYARAGHAVAN SWAMINATHAN
third vulnerable pack. raghavan@sparkcapital.in
+91 44 4344 0022
Large caps – Axis Bank, ICICI Prudential Life, Zee, OMCs and L&T
GAUTAM SINGH
Large Midcaps – RBL Bank, Cholamandalam, Shriram Transport, TVS Motors, Dalmia Bharat, Pidilite, Emami, Apollo Hospitals and Kansai Nerolac gautam@sparkcapital.in
Mid caps – Quess, Most B2B auto ancillaries, Trent, Govt. spend dependent contractors, Gujarat Gas, India Cements and Century Ply +91 22 6176 6804
Portfolio Strategy: We expect companies with weaker business model/franchisee strength to be tested meaningfully in the current uncertain ARJUN N
macro environment. Hence, we recommend a portfolio strategy which has a prudent mix of companies with long history of pricing power and arjun@sparkcapital.in
low beta/inexpensive ‘value’ stocks, hoping that they re-rate from company-specific triggers. +91 44 4344 0081
find SPARK RESEARCH on Page 2
(SPAK <go>)
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
Spark Coverage of 200 stocks put through a quantitative test based on the framework
Parameter Methodology used Impact
Average Gross Profit Margin Average Gross Profit margin FY13-FY18 Higher the better; Reflects pricing power and value addition
Gross Margin Vulnerability & Lower the better; How much of the margins are cyclically
Trough to current Gross Profit margins from FY13-18
Volatility boosted and is vulnerable for mean reversion
EBITDA Margin Vulnerability Lower the better; Strength of shock absorbers and ability to
Trough to current EBITDA margins from FY13-18
& Volatility juggle to deliver profitability
High growth led high Lower the better; Stocks trading at high multiples only due
Revenue CAGR FY18-20E and FY19 P/E
multiples to high growth expectations rather than high quality
Page 3
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
Banks
Inc. SA to Peak to
MCLR Movemen FY18-
Liabilities Assets Assets - Inc. Base Rate - trough ▲in FY19E ▲ in lag
movement I/(D+B) t in YoA ▲ in Retail FY20E
NIM Sensitivity repricing repricing Liabilities deposits MCLR non-CASA P/ABV book Rank
(Dec-17 to Ratio (same spreads Deposits Loan Book
in <1-year in <1-year Mismatch (Sep-16 to differential CoD (FY13 Multiple GNPA Impact
Mar-18) period) CAGR
Mar-18) to FY18)
Higher/ Lower
Lower Higher Higher Lower Higher Higher Lower Lower Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower Lower
the better
Most
Axis Bank 45% 29% -16% 55% 0.15% 18.6% 0.85% 2.65% 2.05% 0.60% 52.7% 18.0% 2.3 1.4% 13
impacted
Indusind 55% 35% -20% 64% 0.40% 23.3% 1.30% 3.30% 3.52% -0.22% 25.1% 30.9% 4.2 0.3% 12
Canara Bank 49% 31% -18% 77% 0.10% 25.4% 1.00% 2.53% 2.23% 0.29% 58.0% 12.5% 1.2 1.4% 11
DCB Bank 53% 20% -33% 23% 0.15% 18.9% 0.57% 2.31% 1.26% 1.05% 43.1% 26.0% 2.1 0.5% 10
Kotak Bank 53% 38% -14% 63% 0.05% 23.7% 0.45% 3.45% 3.86% -0.41% 51.2% 24.5% 4.4 0.6% 9
RBL Bank 66% 57% -9% 16% 0.25% 21.1% 0.65% 3.04% 1.59% 1.46% 29.9% 33.5% 3.3 0.5% 8
YES 47% 39% -8% 26% 0.40% 17.7% 1.00% 2.60% 3.53% -0.93% 29.4% 26.0% 2.6 0.7% 7
ICICI Bank 33% 32% -1% 48% 0.10% 21.2% 0.55% 2.66% 1.68% 0.98% 57.2% 13.5% 1.3 1.1% 6
PNB 31% 19% -12% 63% 0.15% 25.0% 1.05% 2.79% 3.11% -0.33% 67.7% 7.0% 2.7 0.7% 5
KVB 32% 43% 11% 52% 0.15% 23.1% 0.94% 2.63% 1.88% 0.75% 64.6% 15.5% 1.4 0.6% 4
HDFC Bank 44% 40% -4% 32% 0.20% 21.3% 0.55% 2.87% 2.00% 0.88% 57.2% 23.2% 3.6 0.2% 6
Federal Bank 41% 35% -5% 35% 0.00% 19.1% 0.73% 2.01% 2.38% -0.37% 87.1% 20.0% 1.2 0.8% 5
CUB Bank 31% 41% 10% 28% -0.20% 21.7% 0.70% 2.22% 2.24% -0.03% 72.3% 19.5% 3.1 0.5% 4
BOB 48% 30% -18% N/A 0.00% 29.4% 0.85% 1.07% 1.23% -0.16% 66.7% 13.0% 1.2 1.5% 3
South Indian
35% 42% 7% 24% 0.10% 22.8% 0.90% 2.07% 2.65% -0.58% 65.4% 20.0% 1.0 0.6% 2
Bank
Least
SBI 42% 18% -24% 63% 0.20% 30.1% 0.55% 2.09% 1.82% 0.27% 75.0% 11.0% 1.4 0.4% 1
impacted
Page 4
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
NBFCs
Fixed Costs / Operating De-
Liabilities Assets % INDAS Transition Impact
Banks + leverage
Floating repricing repricing portfolio AUM
CP as a % Assets - 65% of
Rate in the in the facing CAGR P/ABV on Total Fixed Securitised/
Particulars of total Liabilities Other Opex Employee Investment Rank
assets next one next one pricing FY18- FY19 Opex as a % GNPA % PCR % Assigned
borrowin Mismatch / as a % of Costs as a % s as a % of
(FY18) year year pressure FY20 of total (FY18) (FY18) Portfolio as
gs (FY18) opex (FY18) of Opex Total Assets
(FY17) (FY17) (FY18) opex (FY18) a % of AUM
(FY18)
Higher/Lower
Higher Lower Lower Higher Higher Lower Lower Lower Lower Lower Lower Lower Higher Lower Higher Lower
the better
Most
Cholamandalam 5% 53% 33% 35% 2% 50% 21% 4.3 55% 27% 82% 2.9% 44% 15% 1% 12
Impacted
AU BANK 55% 28% 41% 32% -10% 45% 37% 6.8 44% 36% 80% 2.0% 37% 17% 16% 11
REPCO 90% 72% 27% 7% -20% 70% 17% 2.4 34% 41% 74% 2.9% 56% 0% 0% 10
Shriram
5% 35% 32% 31% -2% 30% 17% 2.6 50% 31% 81% 9.2% 71% 16% 5% 9
Transport
Mahindra
5% 43% 35% 44% 9% 40% 19% 3.2 46% 33% 80% 8.4% 58% 1% 3% 8
Finance
Sundaram
5% 38% 57% 42% -14% 70% 14% 3.9 37% 33% 70% 1.3% 61% 22% 10% 7
Finance
Bharat
50% 39% 33% 46% 14% 50% 31% 6.6 59% 25% 84% 1.5% 74% 3% 4% 6
Financial
LIC Housing 90% 10% 18% 6% -12% 85% 14% 1.8 65% 22% 87% 0.8% 45% 0% 1% 5
Shriram City
55% 71% 44% 60% 16% 40% 20% 2.7 46% 34% 79% 9.0% 62% 0% 3% 4
Union Finance
Equitas 40% 16% 42% 50% 8% 60% 26% 2.2 32% 38% 70% 2.7% 47% 5% 29% 3
HDFC 90% 15% 16% 18% 2% 70% 17% 2.8 50% 29% 79% 1.1% 29% 10% 8% 2
Least
Ujjivan 95% 43% 76% 68% -8% 5% 31% 2.5 38% 36% 74% 3.7% 81% 0% 13% 1
Impacted
Page 5
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
Insurance
VNB Sensitivity -FY18 (%) EV Sensitivity -FY18 (%) Growth (%) Product mix (%) ROEV protection
Avg Opex
Companies APE
(ex- Op
+100bps 10% +10% +100bps 10% +10% growth v/s % VNB Rank
% ULIP to comm)/Total VIF % of EV variance %
interest increase in increase in interest increase in increase in valuation protection Gearing Impact
APE Premium - (FY18) of opening
rates expense lapse rate rates expense lapse rate (P/EV) to APE (FY18)
Higher/ Lower (FY15-18) EV (FY18)
FY18-20E
the better
Higher Lower Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower Lower Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower
Most
ICICI Pru Life -4.9% -3.5% -8.6% -2.1% -1.0% -1.3% 13.9% 81.9% 5.7% 9.3% 62.6% 1.6% 7.9% 4
impacted
Max Financial 4.9% -5.3% -5.5% -1.9% -0.9% -1.9% 17.2% 41.1% 7.9% 13.7% 67.0% 1.0% 10.0% 3
HDFC Life 0.3% -2.2% -5.6% -1.8% -0.6% -1.8% 17.0% 50.7% 11.3% 12.4% 68.1% 2.9% 10.3% 2
Least
SBI Life 1.0% -2.9% -7.0% -4.0% -0.7% -1.0% 18.4% 66.6% 5.3% 8.0% 60.8% 1.0% 8.4% 1
Impacted
Agro Chemicals
Non-RM cost Working Revenue CAGR Valuation
Companies Avg Gross Gross margin Avg EBITDA EBITDA margin Profit Balance sheet
as a % of Total capital (FY18-FY20) (Diff. between Rank
Margin improvement margin improvement sensitivity efficiency Impact
Higher/ Lower cost efficiency v/s valuation EV/OCF & PE)
the better Higher Higher Higher Higher Lower Lower Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower
Dhanuka Most
39% 7.0% 17% 3% 27% -5% 0.8 -1.9 12% 11.3 5
Agritech Impacted
Rallis India 41% 5.2% 16% 0% 30% -5% 1.1 -1.0 10% -3.5 4
UPL 51% 4.3% 19% 3% 40% -5% 1.5 1.1 14% -2.0 3
Sharda
34% 3.2% 20% 4% 18% -4% 0.8 -0.5 15% -6.8 2
Cropchem
Least
PI Industries 45% 7.3% 20% 6% 31% -4% 0.9 -0.9 17% 2.0 1
Impacted
Page 6
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
Automobiles
Valuation
EBITDA Non-RM cost Working FY18-20E
Avg Gross Gross margin Avg EBITDA Profit Balance sheet (Diff.
Companies margin as a % of capital Revenue Rank
Margin vulnerability margin sensitivity efficiency (x) between
vulnerability Total cost efficiency (x) CAGR Impact
EV/OCF & PE)
Higher more
Higher/lower the better Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower
vulnerable
Most
TVS Motors 28% 0% 7% 2% 23% -5% 1.5 0.7 17% -8.4 7
Impacted
Ashok Leyland 26% 7% 8% 9% 19% -7% 2.4 -2.4 21% -10.1 6
Eicher Motors 42% 13% 25% 18% 23% -2% 1.2 -3.8 22% -9.3 5
Hero MotoCorp 30% 5% 15% 4% 18% -3% 1.1 -1.5 14% -4.2 4
Maruti Suzuki 30% 6% 13% 6% 19% -3% 1.6 -2.9 14% -10.0 3
Mahindra and Mahindra 31% 5% 14% 2% 20% -4% 1.4 -3.0 14% -9.6 2
Least
Bajaj Auto 31% 3% 20% 1% 14% -2% 1.0 -0.1 11% -0.1 1
Impacted
Auto Ancillaries
Most
SKF India 37% 3% 13% 4% 29% -3% 0.8 -4.1 14% 12.0 12
Impacted
Ceat 38% 7% 11% 2% 30% -6% 1.3 4.8 12% 4.7 11
Timken 40% 3% 13% 4% 31% -4% 1.0 -0.1 22% -5.9 10
Rane Holdings 46% 5% 10% 1% 40% -12% 1.0 -1.5 14% 14.3 9
Sundram Fasteners 58% 7% 15% 6% 50% -4% 1.2 -0.1 16% -1.6 8
Bharat Forge 61% 5% 18% 7% 52% -5% 1.4 1.7 16% 5.1 7
Suprajit Engineering 40% 7% 16% 1% 29% -5% 0.9 0.7 12% 4.9 6
NRB Bearings 59% 0% 17% 3% 51% -6% 1.3 2.0 10% 14.5 5
Apollo Tyres 44% 6% 14% 0% 35% -8% 1.6 3.7 16% 2.8 4
Wabco India 41% 0% 16% 0% 30% -4% 1.1 -4.7 20% 26.1 3
Amara Raja Batteries 34% 0% 16% 0% 21% -4% 1.0 -0.8 18% -1.1 2
Least
Exide Industries 36% 1% 14% 0% 25% -4% 1.1 -1.1 14% -4.0 1
Impacted
Page 7
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
Consumption
EBITDA Non-RM cost Working FY18-20E Valuation (Diff.
Companies Avg Gross Gross margin Avg EBITDA Profit Balance sheet
margin as a % of capital Revenue between Rank
Margin vulnerability margin sensitivity efficiency (x)
vulnerability Total cost efficiency (x) CAGR EV/OCF & PE) Impact
Higher/ Lower the better Higher more
Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower
vulnerable
Most
Jyothy Laboratories 48% 3% 13% 5% 41% -6% 0.8 -1.7 15% 2.5 9
Impacted
Emami 65% 10% 26% 8% 52% -8% 1.8 -0.8 15% -7.0 8
Britannia Industries 39% 1% 12% 10% 31% -4% 1.0 -1.6 16% -0.2 7
Hindustan Unilever 50% 5% 18% 6% 39% -5% 1.0 -1.2 15% -3.8 6
Bajaj Corp 63% 10% 31% 3% 46% -6% 0.9 -2.0 15% 0.0 5
Marico 50% 1% 17% 4% 40% -4% 0.9 -0.8 14% -0.8 4
Dabur India 51% 0% 18% 5% 40% -3% 0.9 -2.5 14% 5.0 3
Zydus Wellness 69% 0% 23% 0% 60% -4% 0.8 -5.8 14% 5.1 2
Least
ITC 63% 2% 37% 3% 42% -3% 1.0 -1.6 11% 2.2 1
impacted
Most
Trent 45% 18% 4% 10% 42% -8% 1.1 2.9 22% 51.1 12
Impacted
Pidilite Industries 49% 8% 19% 6% 37% -5% 1.3 -2.3 14% 10.1 11
Kansai Nerolac Paints 36% 8% 14% 6% 25% -5% 1.1 -1.8 14% 8.8 8
Titan 26% 0% 10% 2% 18% -5% 0.9 -2.3 21% 58.8 8
Page Industries 57% 6% 20% 2% 46% -5% 1.4 -1.2 22% 22.2 8
V.I.P.Industries 46% 4% 9% 6% 41% -7% 1.4 -1.5 13% 8.4 7
Asian Paints 43% 1% 18% 3% 31% -5% 1.4 -1.4 18% 13.1 5
Arvind 56% 0% 12% 0% 50% -16% 0.9 5.9 13% 6.9 5
Berger Paints India 41% 3% 13% 4% 32% -6% 1.5 -0.8 15% -0.2 4
Wonderla Holidays 81% 13% 39% 7% 67% -6% 1.9 0.4 15% -13.9 3
Vmart Retail 30% 3% 9% 3% 23% -7% 1.5 -1.1 22% 1.1 2
Least
Bata India 54% 2% 13% 2% 47% -8% 1.5 -3.8 12% 3.1 1
impacted
Page 8
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
Cement
Valuations
GP/T EBITDA/t EBITDA/t Balance
GP/T Average Avg Fixed costs Earnings Working capital - FY18-20E (Diff.
Vulnerability - average volatility sheet FY19E
Companies FY13-18 as a % of total sensitivity- OCF post tax post Revenue between Ranking
Trough to FY13-18 from FY14-18 - Net
(Rs.) costs FY14-18 2% revenue interest/PAT CAGR EV/OCF v/s Impact
FY18 (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) debt/OCF
PE)
Higher more
Higher/ Lower the better Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower Higher Lower Higher Lower
vulnerable
Most
Dalmia Bharat 1,884 467 945 565 30% -7% 317% 2.0 10% -7 7
Impacted
India Cements 1,393 236 697 91 18% -16% 256% 8.9 7% -10 6
Ramco Cements 1,673 637 1,063 591 18% -4% 188% 0.9 10% -7 5
UltraTech 1,993 70 965 75 27% -6% 135% 2.3 15% -8 4
Ambuja Cements 1,489 154 850 141 18% -4% 127% -2.3 6% -9 3
Shree Cement 1,471 372 972 325 18% -4% 154% -1.0 18% -13 2
Least
ACC 1,820 121 707 106 27% -5% 138% -1.9 5% -13 1
impacted
Building Materials
Valuation
EBITDA Non-RM cost Working FY18-20E
Companies Avg Gross Gross margin Avg EBITDA Profit Balance sheet (Diff.
margin as a % of capital Revenue Rank
Margin vulnerability margin sensitivity efficiency (x) between
vulnerability Total cost efficiency (x) CAGR Impact
EV/OCF & PE)
Higher/ Lower the better Higher more
Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower
vulnerable
Most
Century Plyboards 45% 10% 14% 6% 36% -9% 1.0 3.0 17% 8.5 7
Impacted
Astral Poly Technik 30% 6% 14% 3% 18% -6% 1.1 -0.0 22% 1.3 5
Cera Sanitaryware 55% 5% 15% 1% 47% -8% 0.9 0.6 15% 3.0 4
Kajaria Ceramics 60% 7% 17% 2% 52% -7% 1.1 -0.1 11% -3.6 2
Least
Supreme Inds. 37% 1% 11% 0% 29% -5% 1.2 -1.4 14% -3.4 1
impacted
Page 9
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
Bharat Heavy Electricals 41% 9% 7% 12% 36% -10% 0.7 -8.1 8% -8.4 10
Kalpataru Power 33% 3% 16% 1% 20% -6% 1.5 41.1 11% 114.0 6
Triveni Turbine 45% 8% 21% 2% 29% -4% 0.8 -0.8 13% -5.0 5
Grindwell Norton 58% 0% 16% 2% 50% -5% 1.3 -1.2 19% 0.7 4
AIA Engineering 64% 0% 25% 4% 52% -4% 0.9 -2.2 14% -1.8 2
Least
Cummins India 37% 0% 17% 0% 25% -4% 0.8 -1.1 7% 2.4 1
impacted
Page 10
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
Logistics
Valuation
EBITDA Non-RM cost Working FY18-20E
Companies Avg Gross Gross margin Avg EBITDA Profit Balance sheet (Diff.
margin as a % of capital Revenue Rank
Margin vulnerability margin sensitivity efficiency (x) between
vulnerability Total cost efficiency (x) CAGR Impact
EV/OCF & PE)
Higher/ Lower the better Higher more
Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower
vulnerable
Most
Mahindra Logistics 18% 7% 3% 1% 16% -7% 0.3 -5.5 19% 130.1 7
Impacted
Navkar 54% 16% 38% 8% 26% -4% 0.9 2.7 24% 4.6 6
Blue dart 41% 16% 12% 4% 33% -10% 1.1 0.4 10% -15.5 5
VRL Logistics 29% 4% 14% 0% 17% -8% 2.0 0.9 18% -8.6 4
Container Corporation 30% 3% 22% 2% 11% -3% 1.0 -2.2 17% -11.8 2
Least
Gateway Distriparks 35% 0% 22% 1% 17% -4% 1.6 2.5 8% -7.2 1
impacted
Media
Valuation
EBITDA Non-RM cost Working FY18-20E
Companies Avg Gross Gross margin Avg EBITDA Profit Balance sheet (Diff.
margin as a % of capital Revenue Rank
Margin vulnerability margin sensitivity efficiency (x) between
vulnerability Total cost efficiency (x) CAGR Impact
EV/OCF & PE)
Higher/ Lower the better Higher more
Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower
vulnerable
Most
Zee Enterprises 56% 9% 28% 5% 39% -6% 0.5 -7.0 16% 35.0 4
Impacted
Least
Sun TV 88% 0% 69% 1% 61% -3% 0.8 -2.4 21% -4.7 1
impacted
Page 11
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
IT
EBITDA
Companies Gross margin Non-RM cost Working FY18-20E Valuation
Avg Gross Avg EBITDA margin Profit Balance sheet
improvement as a % of capital Revenue (Diff. between Rank
Margin margin improvement sensitivity efficiency (x) Impact
from trough Total cost efficiency (x) CAGR EV/OCF & PE)
from trough
Higher/ Lower the better
Higher Higher Higher Higher Lower Lower Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower
Most
Wipro 31% 0% 21% 0% 12% -4% 0.9 -0.02 4% -2.6 13
Impacted
Firstsource Solutions 32% 0% 11% 1% 23% -7% 1.1 -1.16 8% -1.4 12
Mindtree 37% 1% 17% 0% 24% -6% 1.0 -1.90 13% -5.0 11
Cyient 43% 5% 15% 1% 33% -6% 0.8 -2.28 13% -2.9 10
Tech Mahindra 33% 1% 18% 1% 18% -5% 1.0 -0.55 10% -2.3 9
NIIT Technologies 35% 2% 16% 6% 23% -5% 1.3 -0.74 12% -3.3 8
Eclerx Services 52% 0% 36% 0% 26% -6% 1.0 -1.73 7% -1.7 7
L&T Infotech 33% 5% 20% 0% 16% -5% 0.9 -1.56 17% 0.9 6
Tata Consultancy Services 46% 0% 28% 0% 24% -4% 1.0 -2.06 10% -0.6 5
HCL Technologies 36% 0% 23% 1% 16% -4% 1.0 -1.09 11% -2.2 4
Infosys 37% 0% 27% 0% 13% -3% 1.0 -1.56 8% -1.2 3
Persistent Systems 35% 0% 20% 0% 19% -5% 1.1 -3.72 11% -1.0 2
Least
Tata Elxsi 38% 7% 20% 13% 23% -4% 1.0 -2.41 15% 5.6 1
impacted
Internet, Education & Flexi staffing
EBITDA Non-RM cost Working FY18-20E Valuation
Companies Avg Gross Gross margin Avg EBITDA Profit Balance sheet
margin as a % of capital Revenue (Diff. between Rank
Margin vulnerability margin sensitivity efficiency (x)
vulnerability Total cost efficiency (x) CAGR EV/OCF & PE) Impact
Higher/ Lower the better Higher more
Higher Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower Higher Lower Lower Lower
vulnerable
Most
Quess Corp 11% 8% 5% 2% 6% -3% -0.2 6.5 27% 441.0 7
Impacted
TeamLease Services 3% 2% 1% 3% 2% -3% 0.4 -8.5 23% 0.4 6
Info Edge (India) 58% 4% 30% 11% 40% -4% 1.0 -7.5 16% -7.8 3
Navneet Education 36% 0% 23% 0% 17% -4% 0.7 0.1 13% -1.7 2
Least
Just Dial 46% 5% 25% 6% 28% -3% 1.2 -10.0 10% -5.2 1
impacted
Page 12
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
Most
Apollo Hospitals Enterprise 51% 2% 13% 0% 43% -16% 1.2 5.7 11% -12.7 4
impacted
Narayana Hrudayalaya 75% 3% 11% 0% 72% -35% 2.8 3.6 20% -57.6 3
HealthCare Global Enterprises 73% 8% 13% 6% 67% -26% -52.3 5.1 17% -64.7 2
Least
Dr. Lal PathLabs 79% 0% 25% 3% 72% -5% 1.0 -1.4 18% -3.3 1
Impacted
Most
Glenmark Pharma 69% 0% 20% 0% 59% -10% 0.7 3.8 11% 2.3 13
Impacted
Alkem Lab 56% 7% 15% 3% 45% -6% 0.5 -0.1 16% 4.5 12
Lupin Ltd 67% 3% 25% 0% 55% -9% 0.9 2.3 13% -3.2 11
Sun Pharma 77% 0% 33% 0% 67% -7% 1.0 -2.2 16% 1.9 10
Torrent Pharma 71% 3% 26% 1% 61% -8% 1.0 3.3 20% -5.5 9
Granules India 45% 8% 17% 5% 30% -6% 1.1 4.7 16% 0.8 6
Aurobindo Pharma 55% 10% 22% 8% 36% -5% 0.7 1.2 10% 3.7 4
Page 13
Framework to Identify companies vulnerable for earnings and/or multiples downgrades
Page 14
Spark Model Portfolio
*Operating cash flows (post tax / interest), PPOP for banks Page 15
V-MART RETAIL
FY18 Annual Report Analysis – ‘Niche at the bottom of the pyramid’
Spark Dashboard
SPARK DASHBOARD
Accounting Comments
The company’s CFO declined in FY18 despite ~22% growth in revenues during
Revenue Revenue delta /CFO delta -50x the year. This we believe was majorly owing to its stance of curtailing its
creditor days so as to save on margins.
Since the company does not have any manufacturing operations, it does not
R&D spending trends -
Operating spend on research & development explicitly.
Expenses
In FY18, the company did not provide for any provision against doubtful
Is the provision for bad debt matching with Cash flow? -
advances .
Despite significant improvement in inventory days, given the company’s
EBITDA EBITDA delta/CFO delta -11x conscious decision to decrease creditor days to enhance margins, OCF
marginally declined in FY18.
Higher than prevailing interest rates given actual balances during the twelve
Other Income Interest Income / Average cash and Equivalents 13.3%
months may vary from year end balances.
Given the significant store expansion, depreciation lower than capex and
Depreciation / Capex 48%
useful life of furniture and fixtures being 10 years.
Change in method of depreciation, if any No The company follows the straight line method for depreciation.
Tax Tax in Cash flow / Tax in P&L 110% Higher tax outflow owing to deferred tax liability.
Page 17
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
(highest ever in its history), we note that 15 of them we understand consolidated its outsourced logistics
were opened in Tier IV cities increasing the company’s with third-party logistics players. It employed
footprint in Tier IV cities from 3 stores to 18 stores. We automatic shrink-wrapping machines for cartons to
believe the heightened focus on Tier 4 cities is also reduce pilferage. Further, it established a print-and-
reflective of the ‘coming of age’ of the bottom of apply system to check and weigh cartons before
pyramid Indian consumer. forwarding to stores, minimising shrinkage too.
The company continues to widen its merchandise invested in warehouse automation during the year.
offering with its SKU’s for sale increasing from 3,986 Further, it strengthened its supply chain through
SKU in 2016-17 to 4,591 SKU in FY18. We believe this investments in technologies such as INFOR. It
would not only translate into growing conversion introduced Manthan software for advanced analytics
efficiency but also aid VMART keep competition at bay. leveraging data for more informed operations and
Darwin for better planning.
VMART in FY18 we note developed a celebrity brand commissioning only as many stores as it can fund with
campaign fronted by Bollywood actors Ayushmann internal accruals and maintain a stance of closing stores
Khurrana and Bhumi Pednekar and sponsored events that under-perform as against its benchmark
across its regions of presence. profitability. This we believe would help the company
balance between aggressive and assertive growth.
that understanding continued to strengthen its product Penetration into Newer Areas: VMART whose
mix. The company currently derived ~94% of its operational footprint is majorly spread across Uttar
revenues from fashion oriented merchandise and Pradesh, Bihar & Orrisa among others we note has
progressed in offering private labels such as Be intended to expand into North East India.
Princess, Flick, Desi Mix and Twist etc. in FY18.
Page 18
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
Page 19
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
Page 20
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
Notable Excerpts from Annual Report & Management Discussion & Analysis
Portfolio Enhancement: V-Mart we note has been consistently working towards its investments in widening
its merchandise. In FY18, the company we note enhanced its offering from 3,986 SKU in 2016-17 to 4,591 SKU
in 2017-18. The result of this widening choice translated into a growing conversion efficiency.
Growth Potential: The company extended into Tier-IV towns: of ten stores launched between October and December
2018, five were in Tier-IV towns marked by volume off take (as opposed to high priced products). The company intends to
deepen its footprint by launching stores within 100 to 150 kilometres of existing stores, strengthening synergy and
economies. The prudence of our locational selection is reflected in steady or rising revenue per square feet: from Rs.799
in 2016-17 to Rs. 823 in 2017-18. There are 5,000 more such towns with a population of more than 200,000 across India
where V-Mart can have a presence, capitalising the untapped opportunity.
Natural benefits of business model coupled with Fiscal Discipline: V-Mart’s growing presence in Tier-II, III and IV towns has
generated related benefits such as relatively low rentals, high recall among consumers, ability to keep employee costs and
overheads under control and enjoy high customer loyalty.
Centralised warehousing: V-Mart we note had four warehouses till 2014. In 2015, the company leveraged a hub-and-spoke
delivery model to reduce the number of warehouses to one, moderating inward (from vendors) and outward (from stores)
product movement cycles, while strengthening inventory control and profitability. It also implemented a special pallet
tracking system at the warehouse to optimise space utilisation and reduce costs.
Cascading effect of GST: Nearly 85% of the company’s revenues we note were derived from products with a sticker
price of Rs. 1,000 or lower, attracting the lowest tax slab of 5% thereby strengthening the company’s positioning as a
value-led retailer. Further GST also aided in Ease in documentation which also entailed faster delivery cycles.
Page 21
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
Notable Excerpts from Annual Report & Management Discussion & Analysis
Investments in IT: VMART in FY18 set up a new data center, made investments in IT infrastructure, disaster
recovery facility, deployed retail analytics software and a world class range management software. Further,
the company also implemented a special pallet tracking system at the warehouse to optimise space utilisation
and reduce costs.
Initiatives to strengthen its supply chain management: The company consolidated its outsourced logistics with third-party
logistics players for a superior financial proposition. It also employed automatic shrink-wrapping machines for cartons to
reduce pilferage. Further it also established a print-and-apply system to check and weigh cartons before forwarding to
stores, minimising shrinkage
Way Forward:
The management noted that it intended to revamp and widen its presence on social and digital media, commission stores in
North East India, strengthen the existing brand campaign and reinforce customer feedback collecting mechanisms to service
customers better
Indian Retail Sector – Key Snippets from VMART MDA on Indian Retail Potential:
• Growing at a rate of 12 per cent annually, the sector size is estimated at US$672 billion. The country is the fifth-largest retail destination.
• The “Organised Retail Market” was valued at $60 billion in April 2018, which is only 9 per cent of the total sector. The “Unorganised Retail Market” constitutes
91 per cent of the sector.
• New Models: Retailers will need to adopt omni-channel to not just survive, but leverage a growing opportunity. They will also need to evaluate expansion
through own or franchisees and establish a customised model.
• Intelligent automation: Retailers could seek solutions not just in finance and IT but also in core retail areas like merchandising and supply chain. Retail
companies that are early adopters could enjoy an edge over others, saving costs and enhancing model flexibility.
• Four trends shaping Indian retail: Strengthening existing and new retail markets Retail-tainment, enhancing leisure through shopping, Physical store core to
retailing, Refitting of popular superstores
Page 22
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
VMART’s average revenue per square feet increased Share of household consumption expenditure: Growth of emerging cities
~3% in FY18. The company’s private label revenues
as a % of sales increased from 20% in FY17 to 49% in Rural Tier-IV Tier-III Tier-II Tier-I Metros
FY18. However, we believe at the price point 2016 51% 13% 10% 4% 10% 12%
operated by VMART currently, this equation at least
for now doesn’t matter in the overall scheme of 2025 42% 17% 12% 5% 13% 12%
things.
V-Mart automated its central warehouse and The company noted that as per data compiled by
conducted detailed checks on incoming and outgoing Bloomberg VMART was the world’s best-performing
inventory; Slow moving inventory is transferred to department store, 2017-18.
other store location or sold on promotional discounts.
Page 23
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
FINANCIAL RESULTS
Raw materials 7,027 8,303 18% VMART’s revenues grew ~22% in FY18 led by ~21% growth in
store network (the company had 171 stores as of March 2018 Vs
Employee cost 783 984 26% 141 stores as of March 2017) and ~23% growth in footfalls during
the year.
Other expenditure 1,359 1,609 18%
Total Operating Cost 9,170 10,896 19% We note that the company’s Same Store Sales Growth (SSSG)
for the year was ~9% (in value terms) aided by ~13% volume
EBITDA 848 1,328 57% SSSG. VMART’s conversion rate in FY18 however marginally
reduced to 57% Vs 60% in FY17 with the average transaction
EBITDA margins 8.5% 10.9% -240bps increasing by 5% to Rs.750.
Depreciation 186 229 24%
Aided a host of sourcing initiatives and lower shrinkage the
Other income 41 41 0% company’s gross margins improved by ~223bps to 32.1%.
EBIT 703 1,140 62% Further to healthy gross margin expansion, operating leverage
aided EBITDA Margins expand ~240bps to ~10.9%.
Interest 35 15 -57%
PBT 668 1,125 68% Lower interest expenses and significantly lower effective tax
rate (~30.9% in FY18 Vs ~34.3% in FY17) in addition to EBITDA
Tax 229 348 52% growth led to PAT growing by ~77% to Rs.777mn for the year.
Effective tax rate 34.3% 30.9% We note that an instance of robbery of cash and inventory
worth Rs.1.38mn was noted at one of the stores of the Company,
PAT 439 777 77%
which has been provided for in the financial statements by the
Adj PAT 439 777 77% company.
Page 24
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
Robust Balance Sheet marked by strong capital efficiency and healthy working capital management
Superior operating performance coupled with lower incremental capital employed has led
Annual Financial Results to significant improvement in
Rs. mn\Period 31-Mar-17 31-Mar-18 YoY Growth
30%
Equity Share capital 181 181 0% 25%
25% 24% 23%
Reserves & Surplus 2,520 3,293 31%
21%
Networth 2,700 3,474 29% 20% 18% 18%
16% 16%
Loan Funds 355 3 -99%
15% 12%
Other Long term Liability 66 81 23% 11%
5%
Gross Block 1,947 2,443 25%
0%
Depreciation 802 1,031 29% FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Capital WIP 12 35 192% ROE ROCE
Net Current Assets 975 1,469 51% Source: Company filings, Spark Capital Research
Total Assets 3,121 3,558 14%
Page 25
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
Debt (In Rs.Mn) Debt Equity Ratio Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year 29 137 372%
Source: Company filings, Spark Capital Research Source: FY18 Annual Report & Spark Capital Research
Despite ~57% increase in EBITDA, VMART’s OCF declined y-o-y majorly owing to lower Given the significant store addition in FY18, FCF also marginally declined
creditor days
800 7% 8% 300 3% 4%
2%
700 5% 7% 3%
6% 200 1%
6% 1% 2%
600 6%
100 1%
500 5% 64 201 272 166
Rs.mn
0%
Rs.mn
400 4% 0
-222 -1%
300 2% 3% -100 -2%
200 2% -3%
-200
100 1% -4%
110 399 461 687 643 -4%
-300 -5%
0 0%
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
FCF FCF/Net Sales
OCF OCF/Net Sales
Source: Company filings, Spark Capital Research
Source: Company filings, Spark Capital Research
Page 26
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
Corporate Governance
The Board consists of five Directors comprising one Chairman & Managing Director, three Independent Directors and one whole time director.
BOD member Mr. Lalit Agarwal Mr. Madan Gopal Agarwal Mr. Aakash Moondhra Mr. Murli Ramachandran Ms. Sonal Mattoo
Remuneration of Top Management & BOD trends over the last two years
KMP Designation 2018 2018 % of PAT 2018 Vs 2017 (%) 2017 2017 % of PAT 2016 2017 Vs 2016 (%)
Mr. Lalit Agarwal Managing Director 23.50 3.0% 44% 16.29 3.7% 12.52 30%
Mr. Madan Gopal Agarwal Whole Time Director 6.64 0.9% 54% 4.32 1.0% 3.52 23%
Mr. Aakash Moondhra Independent Non- Executive Director 3.15 0.4% 108% 1.52 0.3% 1.05 45%
Mr. Murli Ramachandran Independent Non- Executive Director 2.63 0.3% 105% 1.29 0.3% 0.93 39%
Ms. Sonal Mattoo Independent Non- Executive Director 2.58 0.3% 104% 1.26 0.3% 0.92 38%
Mr. Anand Agarwal Chief Financial Officer 7.86 1.0% - - - -
Ms. Megha Tandon Company Secretary 0.46 0.1% 39% 0.07 0.0% - -
Mr. Deepak Sharma* Chief Financial Officer - 3.81 0.9% 5.4 -29%
Mr. Sudhir Kumar* Company Secretary - 0.69 0.2% 0.72 15%
Mr. Hemant Agarwal* Non- Executive Director - - 0.2 -
Page 27
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
Key Managerial Personnel Relatives of KMP Entities owned by KMP & Relatives of KMP
Related Parties
Entities owned by KMP &
Key Managerial Personnel Nature of Relation Relatives of KMP Nature of Relation Relatives of KMP Nature of Relation
Managerial Remuneration 2018 2017
Mr. Lalit Agarwal MD Mrs.Sangeeta Agarwal Wife of MD Lalit M Agarwal (HUF) Karta in HUF
Remuneration 11.385 9.108 Mother of MD & Madan Gopal Agarwal
Commission 15.303 8.224 Mr. Madan Gopal Agarwal WTD Mrs.Uma Devi Agarwal Wife of WTD (HUF) Karta in HUF
Perquisites 3.457 3.272 Mr. Aakash Moondhra Independent Director Mr.Snehal Shah Son in Law of WTD Hemant Agarwal (HUF) Karta in HUF
Total 30.147 20.604 Sister of MD & Owned by Hemant
Mr. Murali Ramachandran Independent Director Mrs.Sunita Shah Daughter of WTD Wesbok Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd Agarwal
Brother of MD &
Ms.Sonal Mattoo Independent Director Mr.Hemant Agarwal Son of WTD
Daughter in law of Conquess Business Entity having Significant
Mrs.Smiti Agarwal WTD Services Pvt. Ltd. Influence
Page 28
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
Financial Summary
Abridged Financial Statements
Rs. mn FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18P FY19E FY20E FY21E
Profit & Loss
Revenue 3,835 5,750 7,202 8,093 10,017 12,224 14,715 18,309 22,395
Gross profit 1,140 1,709 2,059 2,380 2,990 3,921 4,635 5,804 7,054
EBITDA 398 522 637 618 848 1,328 1,536 2,061 2,556
Depreciation 76 109 46 190 186 229 261 320 386
EBIT 2 7 22 12 41 41 37 48 60
Other Income 324 421 613 440 703 1,140 1,312 1,789 2,229
Interest expense 57 42 42 31 35 15 0 0 0
Exceptional items 0 0 -18 14 0 0 0 0 0
PBT 266 378 553 423 668 1,125 1,312 1,789 2,229
Reported PAT (after minority interest) 180 252 374 276 439 777 905 1,234 1,494
Adj PAT 180 252 386 267 439 777 905 1,234 1,494
EPS (Rs.) 10.0 14.0 21.4 14.8 24.3 42.9 50.0 68.2 82.5
Balance Sheet
Net Worth 1,477 1,702 2,049 2,307 2,700 3,474 4,328 5,504 6,935
Deferred Tax 0 19 50 84 37 42 42 42 42
Total debt 350 435 302 269 355 3 3 3 3
Other liabilities and provisions 10 12 15 21 29 39 39 39 39
Total Networth and liabilities 1,837 2,168 2,415 2,681 3,121 3,558 4,412 5,588 7,019
Gross Fixed assets 756 1,079 1,396 1,692 1,947 2,443 3,043 3,692 4,438
Net fixed assets 470 691 965 1,076 1,146 1,412 1,751 2,080 2,440
Capital work-in-progress 13 10 7 23 12 35 0 0 0
Goodwill/Intangible Assets 4 9 15 27 27 35 35 35 35
Investments 493 471 376 493 883 515 715 1,115 1,615
Cash and bank balances 158 23 34 43 29 196 305 219 275
Loans & advances and other assets 52 55 60 125 118 234 104 104 104
Net working capital 647 909 958 894 906 1,130 1,501 2,035 2,549
Total assets 1,837 2,168 2,415 2,681 3,121 3,558 4,412 5,588 7,019
Capital Employed 1,827 2,137 2,351 2,576 3,055 3,478 4,331 5,507 6,938
Invested Capital (CE - cash - CWIP) 1,656 2,103 2,310 2,510 3,014 3,247 4,026 5,288 6,663
Net debt -94 220 105 33 -334 -708 -1,017 -1,330 -1,887
Cash Flows
Cash flows from Operations (Pre-tax) 199 230 567 610 930 1,024 1,296 1,527 2,041
Cash flows from Operations (post-tax) 98 110 399 461 687 643 889 973 1,305
Capex 222 333 335 261 416 479 564 649 746
Free cashflows -124 -223 64 201 272 164 325 324 559
Free cashflows (post interest costs) -166 -261 27 171 240 150 318 316 551
Cash flows from Investing -622 -271 -190 -372 -728 -151 -727 -1,001 -1,187
Cash flows from Financing 666 23 -199 -96 49 -384 -52 -58 -63
Total cash & liquid investments 444 216 196 236 689 473 582 496 552
Page 29
V-Mart Retail– FY18 Annual Report Analysis
Financial Summary
VMART’s target population constitutes the lower middle class and lower class, who are expected to witness the biggest ‘delta’ in income levels
over the medium to long term. Further, given the government’s growth thrust on the semi-urban/rural section of economy, we believe VMART
would be a structural beneficiary of this ‘emerging India’ thesis. Furthermore, with the company being ‘HINDI BELT’ revenue heavy, any
systematic uptick in growth rates in core states viz. Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Orissa, etc. is expected to lead to a secular growth trajectory for the
company.
We believe VMART’s revenues and profits can grow Backed by healthy growth trajectory and improving While company currently trades at lifetime peak
at a CAGR of ~22% & ~32% respectively over the FY17 margins without corresponding increase in capital valuation, it still trades at ~20% discount to industry
to FY21E period employed, capital efficiency to further improve average.
FY08-FY11 FY11-FY14 FY14-FY17 FY18-FY22E FY08-FY11 FY11-FY14 FY14-FY17 FY18-FY22E Implied P/E multiple FY22E EPS (mn) Price target
Revenues CAGR 30% 39% 20% 22% RoE (%) 13.8% 18.7% 16.2% 20.2% 37x Rs.102.2 Rs.2,759
Gross Margin 31.1% 29.6% 29.3% 31.6% RoCE (%) 10.1% 15.7% 14.5% 19.5% 39x Rs.102.2 Rs.3,986
EBITDA CAGR 28% 39% 16% 24% RoIC (%) 10% 14.5% 14.4% 19.6%
EBITDA margin 8.1% 9.9% 8.2% 11.2% Average 1 yr fwd
EPS CAGR 21% 59% 16% 24% PE (x) - 10.0 18.9 38.9
Total Asset Turnover (x) 2.74 2.93 3.24 3.26 EV/EBITDA (x) - 5.3 9.8 19.1
Total WC days 88 68 48 47 Peak 1 yr fwd
Pre-tax OCF/EBITDA (%) -6% 56% 100% 89% PE (x) - 12.7 31.6 46.2
Post Tax OCF as a % of IC -3% 10% 19% 24% EV/EBITDA (x) - 7.1 15.8 21.6
Debt/EBITDA 2.5 1.0 0.4 0.0
TOTAL
PAT CAGR of ~24%, exit RETURN OF
Entry = Rs.2,398 @ 35x Cumulative Dividends of
multiple of 39x on FY22E
FY20E EPS Rs.12.3/share 67%
EPS
Page 31
Exchange and Currency Performance SPARK RESEARCH
18 June 2018
Equity Performance (%) Chg. Chg. Currency Performance (%) Chg. Chg.
Global Indices from from Currency from from
Today 1d 5d 1m 3m 6m 12m 52WH 52WL Today 1d 5d 1m 3m 6m 12m 52WH 52WL
Developed Developed
US (Dow Jones) 25,090 -0.3 -0.9 1.5 0.6 1.2 17.3 -5.7 18.4 Dollar Index# 94.9 0.1 1.3 1.3 5.1 1.2 -2.4 -3.1 7.5
UK (FTSE100) 7,634 -1.7 -0.6 -1.2 6.9 1.8 1.8 -3.4 11.2 Pound 1.3 -0.1 -0.8 -1.4 -5.4 -0.8 4.2 -7.7 5.4
Japan (Nikkiei 225) 22,663 -0.8 -0.6 -1.2 4.5 -1.0 13.6 -6.1 17.8 Yen 110.4 0.2 -0.3 0.3 -3.9 1.9 1.0 -3.8 5.5
Germany (DAX) 13,011 -0.7 1.9 0.1 6.5 -0.9 1.9 -4.3 10.9 Euro 1.2 -0.1 -1.6 -1.5 -6.0 -1.6 4.0 -7.7 4.3
BRICS BRICS
Brazil (IBOV) 70,758 -0.9 -3.0 -14.8 -16.6 -3.2 14.8 -19.9 16.9 Real 3.7 2.1 -0.6 -2.0 -11.9 -11.5 -12.2 -6.0 21.1
Russia (IMOEX) 2,238 -0.7 -1.3 -4.6 -3.5 3.6 18.8 -4.9 23.1 Ruble 63.1 0.1 -0.4 -1.2 -8.4 -7.0 -7.3 -3.0 13.6
India (Sensex) 35,622 0.1 0.5 0.2 5.2 7.8 14.5 -2.3 16.1 Rupee 68.1 -0.2 -1.1 -0.2 -4.3 -5.7 -5.5 -0.5 7.7
China (SHCOMP) 3,022 -0.7 -1.5 -5.4 -7.6 -7.5 -3.2 -15.8 0.4 Renminbi 6.4 -0.6 -0.5 -1.0 -1.8 2.6 5.7 -5.9 3.1
South Africa (Jalsh) 57,661 -1.4 -1.0 -1.3 -2.4 0.6 11.7 -6.7 13.6 Rand 13.4 -0.1 -2.1 -5.0 -10.6 -5.2 -3.3 -7.8 16.8
Asian Asian
HK (H S I) 30,309 -0.4 -2.1 -2.4 -3.8 4.3 18.3 -9.5 20.3 HK Dollar 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.4 -0.6 0.0 0.7
Korea (Kospi) 2,379 -1.0 -3.0 -3.3 -4.6 -4.1 0.7 -8.7 3.0 Won 1,104.5 -0.6 -2.7 -2.4 -3.0 -1.4 2.6 -4.6 4.8
Singapore (Straits) 3,301 -1.7 -3.9 -6.8 -6.2 -3.4 2.1 -9.4 3.4 SG Dollar 1.4 0.0 -1.2 -0.6 -2.5 -0.3 2.6 -2.9 3.9
Malaysia (KLCI) 1,746 -0.9 -1.8 -5.5 -5.4 -0.4 -2.4 -7.9 2.2 Ringgit 4.0#N/A N/A -0.2 -0.6 -2.0 2.1 7.0 -7.1 3.7
Indonesia (Jakarta) 5,994 -1.9 0.2 0.6 -6.8 -0.5 5.6 -10.5 5.7 Ind Rupiah 13,932.0#N/A N/A -0.4 0.3 -1.2 -2.6 -4.5 -2.0 6.1
Page 32
Exchange and Currency Performance SPARK RESEARCH
18 June 2018
Rs. bn
Net liquidity 42 151 41 255 (223) 50 300
Money Market Rates Change in BPS 153 82 136 250
128 137 136
NSE MIBOR 6.78 (7) (55) (42) (99) (136) 200
1M CP 7.74 - 86 83 118 118 73 150
73 72 77 57
3M CP 7.44 - - - - - 211 100
6M CP 7.67 4 (34) 39 82 67 92 97 96 100 120 50
3M CD 7.26 - 11 (23) (87) (108) -
6M CD 7.46 9 24 (19) (81) (101) 11-Jun 12-Jun 13-Jun 14-Jun 15-Jun 1M avg
12M CD 7.62 3 17 (25) (71) (104)
Bond Market Change in BPS
India 10 yr 7.84 (5) - 27 65 135 Nifty Top 10 Deliveries
US 10 yr 2.91 (1) (15) 6 51 75 Rank Company Delivery % 30D Del. % Price Chg
Spread (India 10Y-US10Y) 493 1 AMBUJA CEMENTS LTD 81.2 56.5 -0.5%
India 10YR AAA corp 8.71 (6) 10 44 87 115
2 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE 80.5 74.9 -0.1%
Spread (India 10Y-AAA10Y) 88
3 NTPC LTD 74.7 71.8 -1.5%
91D T.Bills 6.40 8 29 4 29 12
1Y T.Bills 6.42 2 (21) 3 18 32 4 ITC LTD 72.5 62.4 -1.0%
Call rate 6.10 2 23 20 12 4 5 BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP LTD 72.3 46.7 -1.0%
LIBOR, MIFOR Change in BPS 6 GAIL INDIA LTD 71.7 56.0 -1.2%
LIBOR 1.56 (18) (35) (64) (70) (91) 7 POWER GRID CORP OF INDIA LTD 70.3 73.7 -0.5%
MIFOR 5.97 (58) (56) (75) (43) (86) 8 BAJAJ AUTO LTD 69.8 48.9 -0.6%
OIS 6.06 (25) (25) (38) (38) (69) 9 ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD 68.4 64.2 -2.0%
12m OIS fwd 6.85 (1) 9 39 47 63 10 CAIRN INDIA LTD 67.5 54.0 0.8%
Market Activity FII & DII - Provisional (INR Bn) Bulk Deals (INR Mn)
Last 5 Day FII Buy FII Sell Net DII Buy DII Sell Net Date Script Client Name Type Price
15-Jun-18 97.9 113.1 -15.2 44.0 38.4 5.6 15-Jun-18 CNOVAPETRO ASIA INVESTMENT CORPORATION MAURITIUS LTD BUY 1,40,000 29.0
14-Jun-18 43.2 56.9 -13.7 31.3 25.6 5.8 15-Jun-18 IBREALEST INDIABULLS REAL ESTATE LIMITED BUY 26,00,000 172.8
13-Jun-18 47.7 48.4 -0.7 40.9 36.1 4.9 15-Jun-18 PENTAGOLD STAR ENTERPRISES BUY 1,74,000 39.3
12-Jun-18 42.4 54.1 -11.7 42.9 29.6 13.3 15-Jun-18 PENTAGOLD TRIKAAL THEATRES AND REALTY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
SELL 99,000 41.0
11-Jun-18 40.2 51.7 -11.6 41.9 31.3 10.6 15-Jun-18 POKARNA ASHISH RAMESHCHANDRA KACHOLIA SELL 2,00,000 177.8
Page 33
Spark Focus Stocks SPARK RESEARCH
18 June 2018
Delivery Volume
Delivery Volume
% inc/dec to 30D
% inc/dec to 30D
PE (All sectors) PE (All sectors)
Returns (%) EV/EBITDA (x) Returns (%) EV/EBITDA (x)
Delivery %
Delivery %
& P/ABV (Banks) & P/ABV (Banks)
Rating
Rating
('000)
('000)
Price
Price
avg
avg
Company Company
1D 1M 3M 1Y FY18E FY19E FY18E FY19E 1D 1M 3M 1Y FY18E FY19E FY18E FY19E
AMARA RAJA BATTERIES LTD 773 0.3 (7.1) (1.2) (7.9) 87.2 (0.5) 34.6 30.4 24.4 16.8 16.3 Buy DALMIA BHARAT LTD 2548 1.0 (5.7) (10.3) 3.3 57.1 0.2 56.2 40.1 23.9 15.1 13.1 Buy
GATEWAY DISTRIPARKS LTD 179 (1.3) 7.0 (6.6) (32.4) 159.5 0.8 81.0 15.6 10.8 12.2 11.4 Buy GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LTD 249 0.4 (13.2) (25.7) (11.9) 27.5 (1.0) 71.9 30.4 28.8 19.6 18.2 Buy
IGARASHI MOTORS INDIA LTD 741 0.2 (8.0) (7.3) (32.4) 19.2 (1.0) 75.8 34.9 35.0 22.9 22.9 Add ASTRAL POLY TECHNIK LTD 1003 (0.4) 7.6 17.3 44.1 5.6 (1.0) 52.4 55.2 38.3 34.2 29.4 Reduce
TIMKEN INDIA LTD 753 (1.1) 6.4 3.4 8.1 6.3 (1.0) 53.4 39.7 33.6 35.2 24.9 Reduce SOMANY CERAMICS LTD 546 0.2 (4.9) (16.8) (30.9) 2.1 (1.0) 61.6 43.2 26.0 15.5 19.3 Buy
VRL LOGISTICS LTD 349 0.8 (12.9) (10.1) 8.2 15.5 (1.0) 42.6 35.1 25.7 18.9 15.5 Buy RAMCO CEMENTS LTD/THE 731 0.2 (13.3) (1.3) 5.4 91.9 (0.5) 44.3 27.8 24.2 16.3 16.5 Add
VST TILLERS TRACTORS LTD 2506 (2.0) (13.0) (5.0) 21.3 2.8 (1.0) 64.8 32.1 27.6 23.3 23.2 Add Financials
WABCO INDIA LTD 7345 (0.4) (3.5) 1.0 30.7 1.9 (0.5) 61.7 52.9 41.6 41.7 35.4 Reduce CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND 1611 0.6 3.4 10.1 47.6 117.2 (0.2) 29.6 4.6 3.8 4.6 3.8 Add
Consumption & Media CITY UNION BANK LTD 188 (0.5) (0.8) 7.2 12.9 97.0 (0.7) 95.3 2.8 2.4 2.8 2.4 Buy
ARVIND LTD 414 (0.5) 3.7 5.4 9.0 174.7 (1.0) 9.1 29.6 20.8 13.2 13.1 Reduce EQUITAS HOLDINGS LTD/INDIA 151 (1.1) (8.5) 7.0 NA 20.0 (1.0) 21.6 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.0 Sel l
BAJAJ CORP LTD 426 (1.0) (5.7) (8.6) 12.9 24.9 (0.8) 71.3 32.1 28.2 25.6 27.2 Buy FEDERAL BANK LTD 84 (2.2) 1.7 (10.1) (30.6) 2528.3 (0.4) 36.0 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.5 Buy
BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD 291 2.7 3.8 15.4 16.2 458.9 (0.1) 54.6 71.7 60.5 23.7 21.1 Add KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD 104 (1.6) 4.9 5.9 (24.8) 803.8 (0.2) 76.0 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.5 Buy
INDIAN TERRAIN FASHIONS LTD 170 (1.3) (3.2) (9.4) (16.5) 286.3 6.0 97.8 23.0 17.7 3.6 3.1 Reduce REPCO HOME FINANCE LTD 563 (0.7) (2.4) (0.9) (36.9) 55.5 (0.3) 33.7 2.9 2.5 2.9 2.5 Reduce
JYOTHY LABORATORIES LTD 452 0.1 2.8 25.9 20.3 30.2 (0.8) 30.3 32.4 30.1 24.4 23.1 Add SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE 2296 0.3 5.8 6.9 (5.9) 20.4 (0.2) 86.2 2.6 2.2 2.6 2.2 Add
KEWAL KIRAN CLOTHING LTD 1440 (2.8) (8.1) (7.2) (16.3) 0.3 (0.8) 90.6 23.6 18.7 14.0 13.5 Add SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD 24 (2.8) (5.9) (4.0) (18.3) 407.5 (0.9) 59.4 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.0 Buy
LA OPALA RG LTD 260 0.0 (6.0) (20.0) (3.2) 105.7 4.2 96.2 53.9 42.8 38.8 31.0 Add SUNDARAM FINANCE LTD 1731 (1.3) (0.1) 6.4 21.6 148.2 (1.0) 87.1 4.3 3.5 4.3 3.5 Add
SUN TV NETWORK LTD 908 (0.4) (4.6) 0.6 8.3 361.6 (0.9) 36.1 33.5 28.6 20.4 18.0 Buy IT Services
WONDERLA HOLIDAYS LTD 335 (1.5) (8.5) (2.2) (10.8) 7.9 (1.0) 52.4 33.0 26.7 28.2 18.6 Add CYIENT LTD 731 (1.3) (7.9) 15.4 43.9 117.1 0.1 25.3 17.0 14.6 14.4 12.8 Buy
ZYDUS WELLNESS LTD 1435 3.5 11.9 17.1 68.7 14.8 (1.0) 34.7 37.9 32.9 45.8 39.8 Buy FIRSTSOURCE SOLUTIONS LTD 82 (0.8) 16.2 65.6 149.0 1512.8 (0.4) 29.3 11.6 11.1 10.1 9.1 Buy
Capital Goods & Infra INTELLECT DESIGN ARENA LTD 213 (2.2) (2.1) 15.1 91.2 205.5 (0.5) 33.6 NA 38.5 NA 30.7 Buy
AIA ENGINEERING LTD 1550 (1.4) (0.9) 15.0 9.0 21.1 (1.0) 58.0 32.8 28.9 20.5 23.0 Buy REDINGTON INDIA LTD 124 (0.2) (4.1) (9.9) (8.0) 1600.1 4.2 69.5 14.0 12.2 9.2 9.8 Add
AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS LTD 354 (0.8) (4.8) (10.5) 11.5 5.2 (1.0) 58.1 19.2 15.1 14.1 11.2 Buy Pharma
BLUE STAR LTD 647 (0.9) (12.3) (17.8) (3.1) 193.8 0.5 55.9 46.1 27.4 30.5 23.4 Buy BIOCON LTD 624 1.5 (4.0) 6.4 83.9 873.9 (0.8) 26.2 91.7 66.6 37.5 41.0 Sel l
ELGI EQUIPMENTS LTD 267 (0.3) (5.8) (4.3) 13.5 7.2 (1.0) 63.1 52.3 36.8 37.6 29.6 Add GRANULES INDIA LTD 89 1.7 (6.1) (19.3) (36.9) 1474.0 (0.7) 21.6 18.9 16.8 12.6 12.6 Add
KIRLOSKAR OIL ENGINES LTD 291 (3.1) (8.5) (20.9) (24.5) 14.4 (1.0) 64.0 36.3 30.7 16.4 18.0 Add HEALTHCARE GLOBAL ENTERPRISE 285 (1.7) (8.1) (5.7) NA 8.5 (1.0) 46.3 77.0 73.6 89.0 74.8 Reduce
KNR CONSTRUCTIONS LTD 263 (2.0) (12.3) (10.3) 28.2 85.8 (1.0) 63.0 25.3 30.7 19.6 12.2 Reduce SYNGENE INTERNATIONAL LTD 584 (0.2) (3.5) 6.8 27.9 111.7 (1.0) 65.6 39.1 35.4 30.6 26.5 Sel l
SADBHAV ENGINEERING LTD 315 (2.6) (14.3) (17.5) 3.4 133.8 (1.0) 61.1 54.0 42.3 12.9 10.7 Reduce Oil & Gas
TECHNO ELECTRIC & ENGINEERIN 291 (1.6) (8.0) (13.0) (29.9) 3.5 (1.0) 51.0 17.6 17.0 13.8 11.7 Sel l GUJARAT GAS LTD 821 0.2 (5.0) (1.6) NA 141.7 (1.0) 70.4 35.9 23.5 20.0 15.7 Sel l
TRIVENI TURBINE LTD 113 0.0 12.8 1.9 (19.2) 10.5 (1.0) 63.1 32.4 26.5 26.1 24.9 Add AgroChemicals
VA TECH WABAG LTD 416 (2.0) (8.7) (17.3) (41.5) 148.2 1.0 72.7 16.2 13.5 11.1 9.2 Reduce PI INDUSTRIES LTD 797 (1.3) (7.6) (3.5) (2.5) 180.6 (1.0) 87.4 28.9 24.8 21.1 21.3 Buy
V-GUARD INDUSTRIES LTD 213 (1.2) (5.3) (8.7) 17.6 121.7 (0.8) 21.8 58.3 46.2 44.6 41.9 Add SHARDA CROPCHEM LTD 395 (0.5) (9.2) 4.6 (18.6) 3.8 (1.0) 68.5 19.6 15.8 11.2 10.9 Buy
VOLTAS LTD 520 (1.2) (5.8) (17.1) 6.1 286.7 (0.9) 27.1 33.3 29.4 30.8 24.8 Buy
Page 34
Spark Recommendation History SPARK RESEARCH
18 June 2018
1500 Price
1000 Target
500
0
May-15 Nov-15 May-16 Nov-16 May-17 Nov-17 May-18
Page 35
Spark Disclaimer (1/2) SPARK RESEARCH
18 June 2018
BUY Stock expected to provide positive returns of >15% over a 1-year horizon ◄► No Change
ADD Stock expected to provide positive returns of >5% – <15% over a 1-year horizon
Absolute Rating Symbol
▼ Downgrade
Interpretation Interpretation
REDUCE Stock expected to provide returns of <5% – -10% over a 1-year horizon
Spark Disclaimer
Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited (Spark Capital) and its affiliates are engaged in investment banking, investment advisory and institutional equities and infrastructure advisory services. Spark
Capital is registered with SEBI as a Stock Broker and Category 1 Merchant Banker.
We hereby declare that our activities were neither suspended nor we have defaulted with any stock exchange authority with whom we are registered in the last five years. We have not been debarred
from doing business by any Stock Exchange/SEBI or any other authorities, nor has our certificate of registration been cancelled by SEBI at any point of time.
Spark Capital has a subsidiary Spark Family Office and Investment Advisors (India) Private Limited which is engaged in the services of providing investment advisory services and is registered with SEBI as
Investment Advisor. Spark Capital has also an associate company Spark Infra Advisors(India) Private Limited which is engaged in providing infrastructure advisory services. Also Spark Capital has an
associate Spark Fund Advisors LLP registered with SEBI as Category III Alternate Investment Fund.
This document does not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. This document is provided
for assistance only and is not intended to be and must not alone be taken as the basis for an investment decision. Nothing in this document should be construed as investment or financial advice, and
nothing in this document should be construed as an advice to buy or sell or solicitation to buy or sell the securities of companies referred to in this document.
Each recipient of this document should make such investigations as it deems necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the securities of companies referred to in this
document (including the merits and risks involved), and should consult its own advisors to determine the merits and risks of such an investment. This document is being supplied to you solely for your
information and may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person or published, copied, in whole or in part, for any purpose. This report is not directed or
intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or
use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject Spark Capital and/or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. The securities described herein may
or may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to a certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession this document may come are required to inform themselves of and to observe such
applicable restrictions. This material should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal.
Spark Capital makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information and opinions contained in this document. Spark Capital , its
affiliates, and the employees of Spark Capital and its affiliates may, from time to time, effect or have effected an own account transaction in, or deal as principal or agent in or for the securities
mentioned in this document. They may perform or seek to perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any company referred to in this report.
This report has been prepared on the basis of information, which is already available in publicly accessible media or developed through an independent analysis by Spark Capital. While we would
endeavour to update the information herein on a reasonable basis, Spark Capital and its affiliates are under no obligation to update the information. Also, there may be regulatory, compliance or other
reasons that prevent Spark Capital and its affiliates from doing so. Neither Spark Capital nor its affiliates or their respective directors, employees, agents or representatives shall be responsible or liable in
any manner, directly or indirectly, for views or opinions expressed in this report or the contents or any errors or discrepancies herein or for any decisions or actions taken in reliance on the report or the
inability to use or access our service in this report or for any loss or damages whether direct or indirect, incidental, special or consequential including without limitation loss of revenue or profits that may
arise from or in connection with the use of or reliance on this report.
Page 36
Spark Disclaimer (2/2) SPARK RESEARCH
18 June 2018
Spark Capital and/or its affiliates and/or employees may have interests/positions, financial or otherwise in the securities mentioned in this report. To enhance transparency, Spark Capital has
incorporated a disclosure of interest statement in this document. This should however not be treated as endorsement of views expressed in this report:
COAL; HDFCB: ICICIBC; SUF; CIFC; CUBK; HDFC; PLNG; NARH;
Disclosure of interest statement INDA GUJGA Others
TCS WPRO; IGM Z; DITV; ITC; ITFL
Analyst financial interest in the company Yes Yes No No No No
Group/directors ownership of the subject company covered Yes No No Yes No No
Investment banking relationship with the company covered No No Yes No No No
Spark Capital’s ownership/any other financial interest in the company covered No No No No Yes No
Associates of Spark Capital’s ownership more than 1% in the company covered No No No No No No
Any other material conflict of interest at the time of publishing the research report No No No No No No
Receipt of compensation by Spark Capital or its Associate Companies from the subject company covered for in the
last twelve months:
Managing/co-managing public offering of securities No No No No No
Investment banking/merchant banking/brokerage services
products or services other than those above in connection with research report
Whether Research Analyst has served as an officer, director or employee of the subject company covered No No No No No
Whether the Research Analyst or Research Entity has been engaged in market making activity of the Subject
No No No No No
Company;
Page 37