Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Meta analysis is the data collection strategy that was picked for this experiment.
Originally, experimental data collection was going to be used to compile data that would be able
to prove the thesis. Practically, carrying out experiments or studies of populations to get the data
that is required would be impossible to do with the resources I have. So instead of carrying out
my own experiments or studies, I compiled data from a multitude of studies and experiments in
order to accomplish the same goal of supporting my thesis and proving my side of the argument.
There were very particular reasons why this strategy were picked over the others. Firstly,
experimental data collection would not work for the reason given above. Observational data
collection was not picked as once again I do not have the resources to observe Sickle Cell and
Malaria and collect data based on those observations. Data collection based on questionnaires,
surveys, and interviews was not picked because the collection of opinions of a population will
Beginning with results, results from study 1 demonstrate the idea that individuals
diagnosed with a heterozygous sickle cell genotype experience increased sickling in cells
infested with the Malaria Parasite. This data does not surprise me as the mechanism in which
cells sickle support the results of this data. The results were caused by this mechanism. Upon
stimulation through Malaria infiltration, for heterozygous individuals, hormone proteins are
released that interact with the cellular membrane of cells with detected plasmodium infiltration.
The interaction acts as a promoter and causes sickling. This supports the data. Alone, the results
mean nearly nothing to my research question. Support with the upcoming studies alongside the
results of this study demonstrate how Sickle Cell is a superior solution to the Malaria argument.
Continuing on with the results from study 2, the results from study 2 demonstrate that Sickle Cell
provides near perfect immunity to all strains of Malaria as demonstrated through non induced
sickle cell patients being diagnosed for Malaria much more than sickle cell patients. This is also
demonstrated through study 4 with different severities of Malaria. In general, sickle cell patients
demonstrate almost perfect immunity to all severities of Malaria. Study 4 and 2 were not
surprising as the scientific mechanism with Sickle Cell Disease supports these findings. The
results are as a result of the characteristics of Sickle Cell. As a result of the shape of sickled cells,
less oxygen is provided to these cells. In Malaria infected cells, this decrease in oxygen causes
the death of the plasmodium. This results in immunity as demonstrated in the data. Here is where
the results of study 1 come into play. As the results of study 2 and 4 determined that sickling of a
patient’s cells provide immunity and study 1 determined that malaria induced cells are sickled at
a greater degree, the conclusion from these 3 studies is that Sickle Cell focuses Malaria induced
cells with increased sickling, kills these cells with decreased oxygen, and provides almost perfect
immunity to the Plasmodium. This supports the thesis and my argument. Finally, the results of
study 3 determine that younger generations when compared with older generations exhibit
increase genotypic features incorporating heterozygous sickle cell traits. This was not surprising
as it makes sense according to the mechanism of evolution and natural selection. A trait that
makes an organism better fit for an environment will result in the more fit organism surviving at
a greater rate than the less fit organisms. This will eventually result in the population with this fit
trait increasing due to the increased rate of survival. Based on this reasoning, since those with
heterozygous sickle cell are surviving at greater rates than those that do not have heterozygous
sickle cell and therefore increasing in population, heterozygous sickle cell must make the human
organism more fit for a Malaria environment. This supports my thesis and my argument. Study
3’s results ultimately combine with the results of study 1,2, and 4 and ultimately, support my
argument.
The limitations of my data collection, meta analysis, derive from the point that articles
are not suited for each other and are distinctive in their own manner. This makes it difficult to
connect all of them. If I were to do this again, I would attempt to find articles even better suited
These results ultimately support my thesis and argument which states implementing a
Sickle Cell environment would be the superior way to deal with Malaria. This may warrant
future research into the topic and allow for a possible cure to the disease through genome editing.
The new knowledge that can be extrapolated from my results include implementing a Sickle Cell