Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ASSIGNMENT
SRU 6024
Designing Questionnaire
ARUNAH SHIVJI
M20171000598
SARANYA KALIAPPAN
M20171000148
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 1
INTRODUCTION 2
CONCLUSIOM 22
BIBLIOGRAFI 23-24
ATTACHMENT 25
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We also want to give our appreciation to both of parents for giving us morale
support to finish this assignment. For our friends thank you so much for the help and
support. Lastly, thanks a lot to the people who give me a lot of inspiration and morale
support for encourage me to finish this assignment An Annotated Bibliography.
1
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
INTRODUCTION
As a measure of a research instrument or tool, validity is the degree to which it
actually measures what it is supposed to measure (Wan, 2002). In simple terms,
validity refers to how well an instrument as measures what it is intended to measure.
A validated questionnaire refers to a questionnaire or scale that has been developed to
be administered among the intended respondents. The validation processes should
have been completed using a representative sample, demonstrating adequate
reliability and validity. A standard questionnaire of internal consistency is Cronbach’s
Alpha (CA). Cronbach Alpha values range from 0 – 1.0. In most cases the value should be
at least 0.70 or higher although a value from 0.60 to 0.70 is acceptable. If item have a
low value, we have to delete a question. If doing so dramatically improves our
Cronbach’s Alpha.
2
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
OBJECTIVE
In this questionnaire design, validity and reliability is referring to the confidence that
the score earned is a good representation of a teacher’s actual knowledge of the
content,attitude towards the contents and practices that are taken for Green
Chemistry.“Reliability is of more concern on standardized or high stakes testing than
they are in classroom assessment. In a classroom, students' knowledge is repeatedly
assessed and this allows the teacher to adjust as new insights are acquired” (Moskal
& Leydens, 2000, p. 7).
iii) To see how far the teachers apply green chemistry awareness in daily life .
Research question
The research presented in this dissertation proposes to answer the following research
questions:
2. How do teachers reason about benefits, costs and risks in real world context that is
relevant to chemistry?
3. What does examination of eye gaze patterns reveal about chemistry teachers’
understanding of structure-property?
3
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
VALIDATION
Agree
X Disagree
1 X X /
2 /
3 X X /
4 X X /
5 X X /
6 /
7 /
8 X X /
9 /
10 /
11 X /
12 /
13 /
14 /
15 /
16 /
17 /
18 /
4
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
19 X /
20 /
21 /
22 /
23 /
24 /
25 X /
26 /
27 /
28 X X /
29 /
30 /
31 X X /
32 X X /
33 /
34 X /
35 X /
36 /
37 /
38 /
39 X X /
40 /
5
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
NUMBER OF AGREE = 35
NUMBER OF DISAGREE = 5
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEM = 40
35 - 5 = 30 = 0.75
40 40
The Cohen’s kappa reading shows 0.75 for this questionnaire. So, its
shows good/perfect levels of agreement based on Cohen’s kappa. This indicates the
amount of agreement between the two experts is strong. The questions in this
questionnaire is acceptable. In conclusion this questionnaire have high validation.
6
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
1 X X /
2 /
3 X X /
4 X X /
5 X X /
6 /
7 /
8 X X /
9 /
10 /
11 X /
12 /
13 /
NUMBER OF AGREE = 12
NUMBER OF DISAGREE = 1
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEM = 13
12 - 1 = 11 = 0. 846
13 13
7
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
The Cohen’s kappa reading shows 0.846 for construct 1. So, its shows
good/ perfect levels of agreement based on Cohen’s kappa. This indicates the amount
of agreement between the two experts is strong. The questions in this construct is
acceptable. In conclusion this construct 1 in this questionnaire is highly validated.
1 /
2 /
3 /
4 /
5 /
6 X /
7 /
8 /
9 /
10 /
11 /
12 X /
13 /
14 /
8
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
NUMBER OF AGREE = 12
NUMBER OF DISAGREE = 2
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEM = 14
12 - 2 = 10 = 0.714
14 14
The Cohen’s kappa reading shows 0.714 for construct 2. So, its shows
good/ perfect levels of agreement based on Cohen’s kappa. The questions in this
construct 2 is acceptable. This indicates the amount of agreement between the two
experts is strong. In conclusion questions in construct 2 that is Green Chemistry
Attitude have high validation.
9
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
1 X X /
2 /
3 /
4 X X /
5 X X /
6 /
7 X /
8 X /
9 /
10 /
11 /
12 X X /
13 /
NUMBER OF AGREE = 11
NUMBER OF DISAGREE = 2
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEM = 13
11 - 2 = 9 = 0.69
13 13
10
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
The Cohen’s kappa reading shows 0.692 for construct 3. So its shows
good/ perfect levels of agreement based on Cohen’s kappa. The questions in this
construct 3 is acceptable. This indicates the amount of agreement between the two
experts is strong. In conclusion questions in construct 3 that is Green Chemistry
Practices have high validation.
11
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS.
Cronbach’s alpha
A simple correlation
Pearson’s correlation
The Spearman Brown formula
Cohen’s Kappa
The range of the reliability coefficient is from 0 to 1. Rule of thumb for preferred
levels of the coefficient:
For high tests, > 0.85. Some authors suggest this figure should be above .90.
For low tests, > 0.70. Some authors suggest this figure should be above 0.80
Therefore, Cronbach’s alpha is most commonly used to assess the internal consistency
of a questionnaire that is made up of multiple Likert-type scales and items.All items
are responded to on a Likert scale of 1-5, where 5 = Strongly agree and 1 = Strongly
disagree. This is so throughout the scale a high score on a question indicates a high
belief in value.To establish whether the items on this questionnaire all reliably
measure the same construct, we ask 30 participants to complete this questionnaire, so
we can calculate Cronbach's alpha based on their scores. Alpha is commonly reported
for the development of scales intended to measure attitudes , tests of teacher’s
knowledge and understanding that cite Cronbach’s alpha as an indicator of
instrument quality.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.932 40
Item-Total Statistics
12
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Corrected
Scale Mean if Item Scale Variance if Item-Total Cronbach's Alpha if
Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Item Deleted
13
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Scale Statistics
14
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Green chemistry which is the latest and one of the most researched topics now days
has been in demand since 1990's. Green chemistry as the name indicates is a
technology imbedded, environmental friendly and cost effective utilization of
resources that minimize or even eliminate the production of harmful bi-products in
the design and manufacturing of the produce. (PDF) A Focus & Review on the
Advancement of Green Chemistry. [accessed Nov 02 2018]. Therefore , we had The
result shows that Cronbach’s alpha quite high : 0.932 , which shows the questionnaire
is reliable. Many researchers consider an alpha coefficient at least 0.070 or more to
be adequate for the scale (Nunnally, 1978). so, we conclude that the teacher’s
knowledge , atitude and practices towards Green Chemistry are at satisfactory level.
15
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.838 13
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted
Scale Statistics
16
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Cronbach’s alpha for construct 1 is : 0.838 , which shows the questionnaire is reliable.
Cronbach’s alpha has been described as ‘one of the most important and pervasive
statistics in research involving test construction and use’ (Cortina, 1993, p. 98) to the
extent that its use in research with multiple-item measurements is
considered routine (Schmitt, 1996, p. 350).Reliability coefficients range from 0.00 to
1.00. Ideally, score reliability should be above 0.70. Coefficients in the range
0.80-0.90 are very good for classroom assessments.
17
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.822 14
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted
18
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Scale Statistics
Cronbach’s alpha for construct 2 is : 0.822 , which shows the questionnaire is reliable.
Theoretically, Cronbach’s alpha results will give a number from 0 to 1,sometimes will
get negative numbers as well. A negative number indicates that something is wrong
with the data. The general rule of thumb is that a Cronbach’s alpha of .70 and above
is good, .80 and above is better, and .90 and above is best.
19
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.875 13
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted
20
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Scale Statistics
Cronbach’s alpha for construct 3 is : 0.875 , which shows the questionnaire is reliable.
Cronbach’s alpha does come with some limitations: scores that have a low number of
items associated with them tend to have lower reliability, and sample size can also
influence the results for better or worse. Cronbach's alpha will generally increase as
the intercorrelations among test items increase, and is thus known as an internal
consistency estimate of reliability of test scores.
21
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
CONCLUSION
Based on the validity and the reliability analysis regarding research findings, so it can
be concluded that the knowledge, attitude and practices of Green Chemistry learning
was supported by proper learning materials developed in the initial stage of this study.
Reliability refers to accuracy and precision of a measurement instrument or scale.
Reliability of test scores are estimated through measures of internal consistency has
been characterized mathematically in many ways that appear, on the surface at least,
to be very different to one another. The coefficient alpha is the most widely used
measure of internal consistency for composite scores. Precision of measurement is
one of the major issues, which is frequently quantified by the reliability coefficients.
The coefficient alpha, developed by Cronbach (1951), is the most commonly used
index for estimating the reliability of measurement instruments such as scales,
multiple item tests, questionnaires, or inventories (Raykov 1997) in all the fields of
research such as psychology, education, statistics, sociology, medicine, counseling,
nursing, political science, and economics (Cortina 1993).
22
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Baxter, G.P, Shavelson, R.J, Golman, S.R. & Pine, J. (1992). Educational of
11. Landis, J.R.; Koch, G.G. (1977). "The measurement of observer agreement
for categorical data". Biometrics. 33 (1):
23
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
13. Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.).
New York: John Wiley. ISBN 0-471-26370-2.
14. Cohen, J. (1968). "Weighed kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision
for scaled disagreement or partial credit". Psychological Bulletin. 70 (4):
213–220.
17. Strijbos, J.; Martens, R.; Prins, F.; Jochems, W. (2006). "Content analysis:
What are they talking about?". Computers & Education. 46: 29–48.
24
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
ATTACHMENT
25
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
EXPERT
1
26
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Tuan/Puan,
Pakar Rujuk Instrumen ‘Kesedaran Kimia Hijau Dalam Kalangan Guru-guru SJK
(Tamil) Simpang Lima, Klang’ Untuk Tujuan Pengesahan
3. Sehubungan itu, saya dan rakan berbesar hati melantik Tuan/Puan sebagai pakar
pengesahan instrumen yang akan digunakan dalam kerja khusus yang berkaitan.
Sekian.
Yang benar,
Arunah Shivji
……………………….
(Arunah Shivji)
Pelajar Semester 3,
Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan (Matematik)
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
27
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
and attitudes of green chemistry among the Simpang Lima Tamil school teachers.
Over the years different principles have been proposed that can be used when
and processes. These principles enable scientists and engineers to protect and
benefit the economy, people and the planet by finding creative and innovative
ways to reduce waste, conserve energy, and discover replacements for hazardous
substances.
This validation aimed to investigate the Green Chemistry topic. 40 questions were
Please tick (/) your level of agreement to represent your opinion. All the responses
are only for the purpose of academic research will be confidential. Your
28
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
1. AGES :
20- 25 1
26 - 30 2
31 - 35 3
> 35 4
2. Gender Male 1 :
Female 2
3. Ethnicity Malay 1 :
Indian 2
Chinese 3
Others 4
29
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
30
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
31
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
32
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
33
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
EXPERT
2
34
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Tuan/Puan,
Pakar Rujuk Instrumen ‘Kesedaran Kimia Hijau Dalam Kalangan Guru-guru SJK
(Tamil) Simpang Lima, Klang’ Untuk Tujuan Pengesahan
3. Sehubungan itu, saya dan rakan berbesar hati melantik Tuan/Puan sebagai pakar
pengesahan instrumen yang akan digunakan dalam kerja khusus yang berkaitan.
Sekian.
Yang benar,
Arunah Shivji
……………………….
(Arunah Shivji)
Pelajar Semester 3,
Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan (Matematik)
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
35
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
and attitudes of green chemistry among the Simpang Lima Tamil school teachers.
Over the years different principles have been proposed that can be used when
and processes. These principles enable scientists and engineers to protect and
benefit the economy, people and the planet by finding creative and innovative
ways to reduce waste, conserve energy, and discover replacements for hazardous
substances.
This validation aimed to investigate the Green Chemistry topic. 40 questions were
Please tick (/) your level of agreement to represent your opinion. All the responses
are only for the purpose of academic research will be confidential. Your
36
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
5. AGES :
21- 25 1
26 - 30 2
31 - 35 3
> 35 4
6. Gender Male 1 :
Female 2
7. Ethnicity Malay 1 :
Indian 2
Chinese 3
Others 4
37
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
38
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
39
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
40
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
41
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
42
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
SAMPLE
RESPONDENT
43
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Tuan/Puan,
Pakar Rujuk Instrumen ‘Kesedaran Kimia Hijau Dalam Kalangan Guru-guru SJK
(Tamil) Simpang Lima, Klang’ Untuk Tujuan Pengesahan
3. Sehubungan itu, saya dan rakan berbesar hati melantik Tuan/Puan sebagai pakar
pengesahan instrumen yang akan digunakan dalam kerja khusus yang berkaitan.
Sekian.
Yang benar,
Arunah Shivji
……………………….
(Arunah Shivji)
Pelajar Semester 3,
Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan (Matematik)
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
44
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
and attitudes of green chemistry among the Simpang Lima Tamil school teachers.
Over the years different principles have been proposed that can be used when
and processes. These principles enable scientists and engineers to protect and
benefit the economy, people and the planet by finding creative and innovative
ways to reduce waste, conserve energy, and discover replacements for hazardous
substances.
This validation aimed to investigate the Green Chemistry topic. 40 questions were
Please tick (/) your level of agreement to represent your opinion. All the responses
are only for the purpose of academic research will be confidential. Your
45
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
46
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
47
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
48
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
49
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
50
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
REPORT
SUMMARY
BY CONSTRUCT
CONSTRUCT 1
51
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Case Summariesa
B1GCK1 B1GCK2 B1GCK3 B1GCK4 B1GCK5 B1GCK6 B1GCK7 B1GCK8 B1GCK9 B1GCK10 B1GCK11 B1GCK12 B1GCK13
1 neutral agree agree agree agree agree Strongly agree Strongly agree agree agree Strongly
2 agree agree agree Strongly agree neutral agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree
3 agree neutral agree Strongly Strongly Strongly neutral Strongly agree Strongly Strongly Strongly agree
4 agree agree agree agree agree agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree
5 Strongly neutral agree Strongly Strongly agree Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly Strongly neutral
6 neutral neutral agree agree agree agree agree agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly agree
7 agree agree agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly neutral
8 agree neutral agree agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly Strongly agree
9 agree agree agree agree Strongly agree agree agree neutral agree Strongly Strongly Strongly
10 agree agree agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree agree agree agree
11 agree Strongly neutral agree neutral agree agree Strongly agree agree agree agree Strongly
12 agree neutral agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree agree agree agree
13 Strongly agree agree agree agree agree Strongly agree Strongly agree agree agree agree
14 neutral neutral agree agree Strongly agree Strongly agree agree Strongly agree agree Strongly
52
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
15 agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly agree Strongly neutral agree Strongly neutral neutral Strongly
16 agree agree neutral agree agree agree Strongly neutral Strongly Strongly neutral neutral agree
17 agree agree Strongly Strongly agree agree agree neutral neutral Strongly agree agree agree
18 Strongly Strongly agree agree agree neutral agree neutral neutral Strongly neutral agree Strongly
19 Strongly agree neutral agree agree agree agree neutral neutral Strongly agree agree Strongly
20 agree neutral neutral Strongly agree neutral agree agree Strongly neutral neutral neutral agree
agree agree
21 agree agree agree agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree agree
22 Strongly neutral agree Strongly agree agree neutral agree agree neutral agree neutral Strongly
23 Strongly neutral Strongly agree neutral agree neutral agree agree agree agree agree agree
agree agree
24 agree agree neutral agree agree agree agree neutral agree Strongly agree neutral Strongly
agree agree
25 agree neutral disagree disagree disagree agree neutral neutral Strongly Strongly agree neutral agree
agree agree
26 agree agree neutral agree agree agree agree neutral agree Strongly agree neutral agree
agree
27 agree neutral neutral neutral neutral Strongly neutral neutral agree disagree agree neutral agree
agree
28 agree agree agree agree Strongly Strongly agree agree Strongly disagree agree neutral agree
29 Strongly neutral agree Strongly agree agree neutral agree agree agree neutral neutral Strongly
30 Strongly disagree disagree agree disagree Strongly agree disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly
53
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
Total N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
54
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
CONSTRUCT 2
Case Summariesa
Case
Number B2GC1 B2GC2 B2GC3 B2GC4 B2GC5 B2GC6 B2GC7 B2GC8 B2GC9 B2GC10 B2GC11 B2GC12 B2GC13 B2GC14
1 1 agree agree neutral agree agree agree agree Strongly agree agree neutral agree agree Strongly
agree agree
2 2 agree neutral Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree agree neutral Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly
3 3 agree agree Strongly neutral Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree agree Strongly neutral Strongly agree
4 4 agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree
agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree
5 5 agree neutral Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree agree neutral agree Strongly Strongly Strongly
6 6 Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly
agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree
7 7 Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly
agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree
8 8 Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree agree
9 9 Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree agree
10 10 Strongly Strongly neutral Strongly agree agree agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly
11 11 Strongly Strongly neutral Strongly agree agree agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly
12 12 Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree agree agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly
13 13 Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree agree agree Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree agree
55
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
14 14 agree Strongly neutral Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly neutral Strongly agree Strongly
15 15 agree Strongly Strongly Strongly neutral agree neutral Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly neutral agree
16 16 agree Strongly Strongly agree neutral agree neutral agree agree Strongly agree Strongly neutral Strongly
17 17 agree Strongly agree agree neutral neutral agree agree agree Strongly Strongly agree neutral Strongly
18 18 agree Strongly Strongly Strongly neutral neutral agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly agree neutral agree
19 19 neutral agree agree agree neutral agree agree Strongly neutral agree Strongly agree neutral Strongly
20 20 neutral agree Strongly agree agree neutral disagree disagree disagree disagree Strongly agree agree agree
agree agree
21 21 agree agree Strongly neutral agree Strongly neutral Strongly agree agree agree neutral agree agree
22 22 agree agree Strongly neutral agree agree neutral neutral agree agree neutral neutral agree Strongly
agree agree
23 23 agree neutral Strongly neutral neutral Strongly neutral Strongly agree neutral Strongly neutral neutral agree
24 24 neutral neutral neutral neutral neutral agree neutral neutral neutral neutral neutral neutral neutral Strongly
agree
25 25 neutral neutral agree neutral neutral neutral neutral Strongly neutral neutral agree neutral neutral agree
agree
26 26 neutral neutral agree agree neutral agree neutral Strongly neutral neutral Strongly agree neutral agree
agree agree
27 27 neutral neutral agree Strongly neutral Strongly neutral agree neutral neutral agree Strongly neutral Strongly
28 28 neutral agree agree agree agree Strongly neutral Strongly neutral agree neutral agree agree agree
agree agree
29 29 neutral Strongly Strongly neutral agree Strongly neutral Strongly neutral Strongly agree neutral agree neutral
56
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
30 30 neutral agree neutral Strongly agree agree neutral agree neutral agree agree neutral agree Strongly
agree agree
Tota N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
57
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
CONSTRUCT 3
Case Summariesa
Case
Number B3GC1 B3GC2 B3GC3 B3GC4 B3GC5 B3GC6 B3GC7 B3GC8 B3GC9 B3GC10 B3GC11 B3GC12 B3GC13
1 1 agree Strongly agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree
agree
2 2 Strongly agree agree neutral agree Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree agree neutral
3 3 Strongly agree agree agree agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree agree agree
4 4 Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly
agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree
5 5 Strongly agree agree neutral agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly agree neutral
6 6 Strongly agree Strongly Strongly agree agree neutral Strongly agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly
7 7 Strongly agree Strongly Strongly agree agree Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly
8 8 Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree neutral Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly Strongly
9 9 Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree Strongly Strongly agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly
agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree agree
10 10 agree Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree neutral agree Strongly agree Strongly Strongly Strongly
11 11 agree neutral Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree agree Strongly agree agree Strongly Strongly
12 12 agree agree Strongly Strongly Strongly agree agree agree agree agree Strongly Strongly Strongly
13 13 agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree agree Strongly Strongly
58
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
14 14 agree agree agree Strongly neutral agree agree agree agree agree Strongly agree Strongly
15 15 neutral agree agree Strongly neutral neutral Strongly neutral neutral neutral Strongly agree Strongly
16 16 neutral Strongly agree Strongly neutral neutral agree neutral Strongly neutral agree agree Strongly
17 17 agree Strongly agree Strongly neutral neutral Strongly agree agree agree agree agree Strongly
18 18 agree agree agree Strongly agree neutral Strongly agree agree agree Strongly agree Strongly
19 19 agree Strongly neutral agree Strongly neutral Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly neutral agree
20 20 neutral agree neutral agree disagree agree Strongly neutral agree neutral agree neutral agree
agree
21 21 neutral agree agree agree disagree agree agree neutral Strongly neutral agree agree agree
Disagree
22 22 neutral Strongly agree agree disagree agree Strongly neutral agree neutral Strongly agree agree
23 23 neutral agree agree neutral Strongly neutral agree neutral Strongly neutral agree agree neutral
Disagree agree
24 24 neutral agree neutral neutral Strongly neutral agree neutral Strongly neutral Strongly neutral neutral
25 25 neutral Strongly neutral neutral disagree neutral neutral neutral Strongly neutral Strongly neutral neutral
26 26 neutral agree neutral neutral neutral neutral agree neutral agree neutral agree neutral neutral
27 27 neutral neutral neutral neutral neutral neutral agree neutral Strongly neutral agree neutral neutral
Disagree
28 28 neutral Strongly neutral agree neutral agree agree neutral agree neutral agree neutral agree
agree
29 29 neutral agree neutral Strongly neutral agree agree neutral agree neutral Strongly neutral Strongly
59
ARUNAH SHIVJI M20171000598
30 30 neutral agree neutral agree agree agree agree neutral Strongly neutral agree neutral agree
Disagree
Total N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
60