Sei sulla pagina 1di 5

Author Guidelines Vol. 1/No.

2/July-December, 2018

Author Guidelines

Introduction The accepted articles are edited for grammatical,

J ournal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society punctuation, print style and format errors and
(JNPS) is a peer reviewed, Prosthodontic page proofs and are sent to the corresponding
journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society(NPS). author who should return them within three
JNPS is the first prosthodontic journal from days. Non-response to galley proof may result
Nepal since 2017 AD. in the delay of publication or even rejection of
the article.
The Editorial Process
Reporting Guidelines
The submitted manuscripts are duly
acknowledged and initially reviewed for The guidelines listed below should be
possible publication by the Editors with the followed where appropriate. Please use these
understanding that they are being submitted guidelines to structure your article. Completed
only to the JNPS, have not been published, applicable checklists, structured abstracts and
simultaneously submitted or accepted for flow diagrams should be uploaded with your
publication elsewhere. On an average, 30-40% submission; these will be published alongside
of the manuscripts with insufficient originality the final version of your paper.
or significant message, serious scientific and The Equator Network (Enhancing the Quality
technical flaws are rejected. In the case of a and Transparency Of health Research) provides
good article that has been written poorly, the a comprehensive list of reporting guidelines.
authors are asked to resubmit after revision.
JNPS is abide by the principles of COPE, CSE, Focus and Scope
WAME, ICJME, DOAJ, OASPA guidelines. JNPS invites original research papers,
review articles, case reports, prosthodontic
The Peer Review Process
rehabilitation, viewpoints letter to the editor
The manuscripts are then sent to two expert peer containing new insight into any aspect of
reviewers blinded to the contributor’s identity prosthodontic rehabilitation that are not
and vice versa for meticulous review, inputs published or not being considered for publication
and comments. The final decision on whether elsewhere. The journal is particularly interested
to accept or reject the article are taken by the and welcomes papers in basic and clinical
Editor-in-Chief based on editorial board and prosthodontic rehabilitation, dental materials,
peer reviewers. The contributors are informed research and publication ethics, too.
about the rejection/acceptance of the manuscript
with the peer reviewer’s comments. Accepted Editorial
articles have to be resubmitted after making the It is submitted by an editorial board or invited
necessary changes or clarifying questions made piece on most pertinent issues in the field
during the peer review process. of prosthodontic in Nepal or in the world. It
116 Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society (JNPS)
Author Guideline

undergoes fast track peer review process. Short Communication / Viewpoint

Original Article Short communication is research article which


doesn't fit exactly into research article but
JNPS accept Randomised controlled trials, findings are interesting, e.g. pilot study. It
interventional studies, studies of screening undergoes peer review process. Viewpoint is
and diagnostic test, case control series and based on issues related to health sciences to
researches conducted in the field of basic and raise the voice, awareness, new ideas, thought
clinical prosthodontic rehabilitation and dental to provoke concepts, and personal expert
materials science with the maximum length opinion to improve the health. Up to 800 words
of 2500-3500 words (excluding abstract of excluding 5 - 8 references.
250 words). It undergoes rigorous peer review
process. Please expect lots of communication Letter to the Editor
from the JNPS. Should be short, decisive observation. Comment
Case Reports relating a recent article, an elaboration of an
important discovery, or simply a thought-
Reports of clinical patient diagnosis and provoking commentary of fewer than 1000
treatment that contribute to the body of words without an abstract.
prosthodontic knowledge by providing in-
depth observations, treatment and outcome. Peer Review Process
These reports should document new, unique, or The Chief Editor, together with the editorial
innovative treatments or describe prosthodontic board will ensure following peer review policy:
patients with unusual dental conditions. The
1. Double blind: The manuscript will be
manuscript should not exceed 1,000 words in
blinded when sending out for review. The
length.
author is anonymous to the reviewer and
Review Article the reviewer is anonymous to the author as
well.
Review articles which summarise the current
state of understanding on a topic and analyses 2. One-stage review: The reviewer is involved
or discuss research previously published by in the initial review of the manuscript only,
others, rather than reporting new experimental i.e. not involved in evaluating the revisions
results. made by the author based on the reviewer’s
comments. Rather, the Chief Editor carries
They are very thorough literature reviews the manuscript forward following the initial
that identify historical and current trends in review.
the research, important scholars in the field, 3. In rare, controversial and special
foundational articles, major discoveries, gaps circumstances; Two-stage review: Those
in the research (areas for further exploration), papers that require revision as suggested
and current debates or controversies. It has to by the reviewer will be sent back to that
be about 3000 words without counting abstract same reviewer for him/her to evaluate the
(200 words) and references (>50 and usually manuscript once again after revised re-
<100). It undergoes rigorous peer review submission from the author.
process.

Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society (JNPS) 117


Author Guideline

The author has to submit their manuscript The editors will be responsible for directing
according to JNPS section policy. the manuscripts to the appropriate reviewers
- All submitted article will undergo who have the knowledge and/or expertise in
international peer review with blinding for the requisite fields. Each manuscript will be
two peer reviewers, simultaneously. If the accepted (sometimes on a conditional basis
decision conflicts between two, it will be pending suggested changes) or declined based
sent to third peer reviewer. on the reviewers' comments, and other factors
- The typical review will take minimum 4-6 by Chief Editor's decisions. In the case of a
weeks which includes 2 weeks for peer controversial groundbreaking article that could
review and remaining weeks for peer review have a far-reaching impact on the field, further
handling process. However, this may take reviews may be sought. The decision ultimately
little longer due to unseen workloads. rests with the chief editor.

- When the article is received from peer Peer Reviewers will be provided with Review
reviewer there will be one of the following Guidelines, once they accept to review the
outcome and the decision choices include: submission. JNPS will rate reviewers on a five-
point quality scale after each review.
Accept Submission: The submission will be
accepted without revisions. Submission Documents
Revisions Required: The submission will be Please submit all the following documents
accepted after minor changes have been made while submitting your new manuscript to JNPS:
according to the reviewer's comment. 1. Forwarding letter
Resubmit for Review: The submission needs to 2. Authorship
be re-worked, but with significant changes, may 3. Declaration
be accepted. It will require a second round of 4. Manuscript
review, however. 5. Ethical Approval letter*

Resubmit elsewhere: When the submission *This is for research article only. Ethical
does not meet the focus and scope of JNPS. approval letter should be taken before starting
the research. Any research without ethically
Decline Submission: The submission will not approved from recognised ethical review board
be published in the journal. is of no value. The Ethical Review Board of
All comments received from the reviewers will Nepal Health Research Council is the apex body
be passed on to the authors within 4-6 weeks for looking after the ethics in research in Nepal.
after getting back from the reviewers. Regardless However, ERB has established institutions
of whether or not the submission is accepted review committee in most of the medical college,
for publication, it is essential that appropriate tertiary care centre hospitals and research centre
feedback is provided to the contributors. throughout the country. If you do not belong to
JNPS respect the views, opinion, comments and such IRC centres, please contact ERB, NHRC
decision of the reviewer. However, the right for ethical approval of your research. For
for acceptance and rejection of the manuscript international author - please provide ethical
is reserved with the Chief Editor, on the basis approval letter from your institutional ethical
of maintaining the integrity of the science, committee or national body responsible for
following the guideline of ICJME and COPE. ethics in research.

118 Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society (JNPS)


Author Guideline

Any submission without above documents and to the email you at your mail ID which you
manuscript not in JNPS format will be rejected have provided during REGISTRATION to
outright. Therefore to avoid such errors and JNPS. We may also contact you anytime
rejection, please submit your article with all for immediate information to speed up the
supplementary and required files along with the review process.
use of appropriate template given below. 6. Please do not contact editorial member's
personal telephone numbers but JNPS
Templates
office. If you have more queries,
The majority of the submitted manuscript lack please contact us anytime. Help us to help
proper formatting, on the top of that heading and you by providing required information as
subheading are not correctly written. Therefore, listed on this page.
we encourage you to use appropriate template
for your manuscript. Submission Preparation Checklist
1. Original Article Template As part of the submission process, authors
2. Case Report Template are required to check off their submission's
3. Review Article Template compliance with all of the following items, and
4 Short communication / Viewpoint Template submissions may be returned to authors that do
5. Letter to the Editor Template not adhere to these guidelines.
Submission Preparation Checklist:
Must Have Information
1. The submission has not been previously
To minimise the rejection (or return for revision) published, nor is it before another journal
of your article please do the followings: for consideration (or an explanation has
All the documents have to be submitted at once been provided in Comments to the Editor).
(as listed above).
2. The submission file should be Microsoft
1. Please use the template for your respective office Word (*.doc /*.docx) file format.
manuscript to avoid error in the heading
3. Where available, URLs for the references
and subheadings.
have been provided.
2. Please address all the point described in the
4. The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point
JNPS checklist, references and manuscript
font; employs italics, rather than underlining
preparation guidelines etc.
(except with URL addresses); and all
3. Please do not submit the article that we illustrations, figures, and tables are placed
do not publish (check author guideline for within the text at the appropriate points,
a different type of article we accept). rather than at the end.
4. If you have difficulty working in the 5. The text adheres to the stylistic and
computer or not good at it particularly bibliographic requirements outlined in the
Microsoft word document, please seek Author Guidelines, which is found in About
a professional help to prepare your the Journal.
manuscript according to our need.
6. If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of
5. Email is the preferred methods of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a
communication, therefore, please check Blind Review have been followed.
your email once a day after you submit an
7. References must be identified in the body of
article to JNPS. We will inform you about
the article with superscript Arabic numerals.
the status of your article through our system
At the end of a sentence, the reference number
Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society (JNPS) 119
Author Guideline

falls after the period. The complete reference Open Access Policy
list, double-spaced and in numerical order, This journal provides immediate open access to
should follow the Conclusions section. its content on the principle that making research
Reference formatting should conform to freely available to the public supports a greater
Vancouver style as set forth in “Uniform global exchange of knowledge.
Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted
to Biomedical Journals” (Ann Intern Med Copyright Notice
1997;126:36-47).
JNPS allow to read, download, copy, distribute,
8. Supplementary Files: Please also submit print, search, or link to the full texts of its
supplementary files along with your articles and allow readers to use them for any
manuscript and also go through JNPS other lawful purpose. The author(s) are allowed
Checklist (must read): to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
9. JNPS Templates: Please prepare your The JNPS work is licensed under a Creative
manuscript in JNPS templates as listed above. Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

120 Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society (JNPS)

Potrebbero piacerti anche