Sei sulla pagina 1di 11

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/245305379

Influence of Repeated and Sustained Loading on the Performance of Layered


Wood–Concrete Composite Beams

Article  in  Journal of Structural Engineering · March 2008


DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:3(430)

CITATIONS READS

33 193

4 authors, including:

Massimo Fragiacomo
Università degli Studi dell'Aquila
188 PUBLICATIONS   2,660 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Massimo Fragiacomo on 30 September 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Influence of Repeated and Sustained Loading
on the Performance of Layered Wood–Concrete
Composite Beams
J. Balogh1; M. Fragiacomo2; R. M. Gutkowski3; and R. S. Fast4

Abstract: The paper investigates the influence of cyclic and sustained loading on the performance of layered wood–concrete composite
beams interconnected by a notched connection detail. A number of composite beams were conditioned in a climate chamber in order to
raise the wood moisture content from the ambient value 共5–7%兲 to about 12%. Then the beams were subjected to 21,600 cycles of loading
and unloading to simulate the typical live load frequency experienced by the floor of a commercial building over a 30-year service life.
Finally, each individual beam was ramp loaded to failure to determine the ultimate load carrying capacity and composite efficiency.
Additional beams were subjected to sustained load for 133 days in an unconditioned environment and then tested to failure. The main
outcomes of the experimental program were: 共1兲 relatively high beam stiffness and strength were achieved despite the use of few
connectors; 共2兲 two types of failure mechanisms were detected: either shear in the wood between the exterior notch and the beam end, or
wood bending failure at midspan; 共3兲 the cyclic loading increased the initial elastic deflection by 18% and reduced the beam stiffness by
9%, on average; 共4兲 after 133 days of sustained load, the deflection increased by 59%, on average; and 共5兲 the reduction in stiffness and
in load capacity due to sustained loading was greater than that due to the cyclic loading.
DOI: 10.1061/共ASCE兲0733-9445共2008兲134:3共430兲
CE Database subject headings: Composite beams; Concrete; Connections; Creep; Cyclic loads; Laboratory tests; Time dependence;
Timber construction; Notches.

Introduction tions, improved seismic and fire resistance, better acoustic sepa-
ration and thermal mass than wood-only systems. The lower
Layered wood–concrete and timber–concrete composite beams weight than reinforced concrete floors also needs to be high-
represent a structural concept recently used for strength and stiff- lighted, as these floor systems impose less load on the foundations
ness upgrading of existing floors and installing new floors. This and in earthquake-prone regions they reduce the lateral strength
concept consists of interconnecting existing or new timber beams required within the structural system.
to a concrete slab cast above the timber beams 共Ahmadi and Saka The choice of the connection system is crucial in order to
1993; Ceccotti 1995兲. Steel mesh is usually cast into the slab to make the composite system structurally effective and economi-
resist potential tensile stresses due to bending, and to reduce the cally competitive. Stiff and strong interlayer shear connections
concrete crack width. This composite system provides many ben- are required to provide optimal structural efficiency. By prevent-
efits compared to wood-only or concrete-only floor systems. They ing relative slip between the bottom fiber of the concrete layer
include greater strength and stiffness, less susceptibility to vibra- and the top fiber of the timber layer, a high degree of composite
action can be achieved, where the concrete layer is mainly com-
1
Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Technology, Metropolitan pressed and the timber layer is subjected to both bending and
State College of Denver, Campus Box 61, P.O. Box 173362, Denver, tension. The connection system can be either discrete, i.e., using a
CO 80217-3362. E-mail: jbalogh@mscd.edu number of discrete elements 共usually mechanical fasteners兲
2
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Planning, Univ. of spaced along the length 共Piazza and Ballerini 2000; Gelfi et al.
Sassari, Palazzo del Pou Salit, Piazza Duomo 6, 07041 Alghero, Italy. 2002; Steinberg et al. 2003; Grantham et al. 2004, Lukaszewska
E-mail fragiacomo@uniss.it
3 et al. 2007; Dias et al. 2007; Fragiacomo et al. 2007; Ceccotti
Full Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372. E-mail gutkowsk@ et al. 2007兲, or it can be a continuous element, e.g., an adhesive
engr.colostate.edu placed along the entire length of the beam 共Negrão et al. 2006;
4 Brunner and Schnuriger 2006兲 or a steel mesh glued in the timber
Formerly, Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, beam 共Bathon and Graf 2000; Clouston et al. 2005兲.
CO 80523-1372. Among the discrete systems, a notched shear-key connection
Note. Associate Editor: Rakesh Gupta. Discussion open until August detail has a high degree of effectiveness. In this system, the in-
1, 2008. Separate discussions must be submitted for individual papers. To terconnection between wood and concrete is achieved by direct
extend the closing date by one month, a written request must be filed with
bearing of the concrete in the notch on the wood surface and
the ASCE Managing Editor. The manuscript for this paper was submitted
for review and possible publication on June 19, 2007; approved on horizontal shear in the concrete key 共Natterer et al. 1996兲. Advan-
October 3, 2007. This paper is part of the Journal of Structural Engi- tages of the notch detail with respect to mechanical connectors
neering, Vol. 134, No. 3, March 1, 2008. ©ASCE, ISSN 0733-9445/ such as dowels, etc. include the higher composite action 共i.e.,
2008/3-430–439/$25.00. stiffness of the composite system兲 and larger achievable load-

430 / JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / MARCH 2008


Fig. 1. 共a兲 Elevation; 共b兲 cross-section of the notched composite beam 共dimensions in cm兲

bearing capacity. This results in a composite beam comparatively All load tests were performed in the Structural Engineering Labo-
less expensive where only few 共two to four, depending on the bay ratory at CSU.
length兲 notches per side ensure the achievement of high degree of
composite action. Different details are being studied in Germany
Beam Specimen Construction
共Schänzlin 2003, Kuhlmann and Michelfelder 2006兲, the United
States 共Gutkowski et al. 2004, 2006兲, Portugal 共Dias et al. 2006; The beam specimens used in Tests 2–4 are depicted in Fig. 1.
Jorge et al. 2006兲, and New Zealand 共Deam et al. 2007兲. They were constructed from five 368 cm 共12 ft and 1 in.兲
Due to the large potential market in the United States for both long nominal 5 ⫻ 10 cm 共2 ⫻ 4 in.兲 of actual size 4 ⫻ 9 cm
multistory building floors and replacement or rehabilitation of 共1.5⫻ 3.5 in.兲 Grade 2 Hem-Fir sawn lumber boards nailed to-
deteriorated short-span wood bridges, an extensive experimental gether with ordinary nails. The span of 368 cm 共12 ft and 1 in.兲 is
program is being conducted at Colorado State University 共CSU兲 the maximum length available for a U.S. standard “2 ⫻ 4” 共1.5 in.
on wood–concrete composite beams with a notched connection by 3.5 in.兲 dimension lumber cross section. The shear notches
detail. The program includes ultimate load tests on the connection were then cut out of the beam and the shear notch connection was
detail, ultimate load and long-term tests on beams and full-scale created 共Fig. 2兲. The shear notch connection was made by first
floors, and cyclic tests simulating the repetition of the live load drilling and tapping a pilot hole at the center of each notch to the
during the service life of the structure 共Fast et al. 2003兲. The appropriate size for the threaded end of the dowel connector that
outcomes of the first tests to failure performed on the connection was to be inserted into the wood. HIT HY 150 epoxy adhesive
details were published in Gutkowski et al. 共2004兲. The results of made by Hilti, Inc. 共Schaan, Principality of Liechtenstein, http://
preliminary tests to failure on wood–concrete composite beams www.hilti.com/兲 was then placed into the tapped hole prior to
were reported in Gutkowski et al. 共2007兲, whereas the outcomes inserting the dowel connector into it 共Gutkowski et al. 2004兲. The
of the long-term tests performed on some beams including a nu- dowel connector was fabricated from standard 12.7 mm 共0.5 in.兲
merical modeling and a simplified analytical method were pre- diameter tapered washers made in Germany and standard
sented in Fragiacomo et al. 共2007兲. 12.7 mm 共0.5 in.兲 threaded rod. A plastic sleeve was placed on the
This paper reports the results of the cyclic and static tests top end of the dowel connector which was not embedded in the
performed on a number of wood–concrete composite beams with wood but would be surrounded by the concrete layer. The sleeve
notched connection detail. Some of the beams were precondi- insures that no bonding takes place between the concrete and the
tioned in climate chamber to a 12% moisture content of wood, dowel connector. Finally, a plastic cap was installed over the head
and then subjected to 21,600 cycles of loading and unloading to of the dowel connector. This was done so the cap could later be
simulate the typical live load experienced by the floor of a com- removed and the connector could be tightened after the concrete
mercial building over the course of a 30-year service life. Other was cured.
beams were subjected to long-term tests under sustained load Formwork was then built for each beam and concrete was
prior to testing them to destruction. The stiffness degradation due placed on top of the wood layer. This process was repeated twice
to the cyclic and long-term tests and the increase in deflection
were evaluated by comparing the results prior to and after the
cyclic and long-term tests. The efficiency of the notched connec-
tion detail was evaluated based on the experimental results. The
load-bearing capacity of the composite beams was assessed, in-
cluding the different types of failure mechanisms observed in the
load tests.

Experimental Program

The experimental program comprised: 共1兲 material testing of


wood and concrete used in the composite beams; 共2兲 creep tests
of composite beams; 共3兲 cyclic tests on composite beams pre-
conditioned to 12% moisture content; and 共4兲 tests to failure of
the beams previously tested under repeated or sustained loading. Fig. 2. Shear key/anchor connection detail 共dimensions in mm兲

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / MARCH 2008 / 431


Table 1. Results of the Material Tests Performed on Wood and Concrete 26.1 MPa 共3,780 psi兲 for the second batch, the corresponding
Cylindr. compr. average Young’s modulus was calculated using the relation-
Wood spec. MOE strength ship with the strength suggested by ACI 318-02 共American
共second batch兲 共MPa兲 Concrete 共MPa兲 Concrete Institute 2002兲. The calculated values were 26.1 GPa
共3,790 ksi兲 and 24.2 GPa 共3,504 ksi兲 for the first and second
RB301 7019
batch, respectively.
RB303 7888 First batch:
RB304 7439 No. specimens 8
RB306 8081 Minimum 28.29
Cyclic Tests
RB309 6722 Maximum 32.92
RB310 9363 Average 30.51
The purpose of the repeated 共cyclic兲 load tests was to simulate the
RB401 9687 Standard deviation 1.41 effect of long-term live load applications to a wood–concrete
RB406 10542 composite floor system in a commercial building over the pro-
RB407 9880 Second batch: jected service life of 30 years. Little research has been made on
RB408 9949 No. specimens 5 the behavior of wood–concrete composite beams under repeated
RB409 8791 Minimum 23.90 loading. Weaver et al. 共2004兲 performed a repeated load test under
RB410 7895 Maximum 28.65 2 million fatigue cycles on wood–concrete composite bridges and
Average 8605 Average 26.07 push-out specimens with dowel-type shear connectors. This test
Standard deviation 1269 Standard deviation 1.72 indicated no significant variation in the shear strength of the
connectors. However, an increase in deflection of about 5% of
the ultimate value at failure was observed on the bridges after the
over the duration of the experiment resulting in two batches of application of the load cycles. Döhrer and Rautenstrauch 共2006兲
wood–concrete composite beams. The first batch included the performed repeated load tests on push-out specimens with
beams that were used in the creep tests. The second batch was notched and stud connectors. An increase in slip between wood
cast later for the beams that were first conditioned to 12% in and concrete of about 8% of the ultimate value was observed
climate chamber and then subjected to the cyclic test. After the after 2 million fatigue cycles, together with an increase in shear
concrete was poured, plastic insulation sheets were placed over modulus.
the concrete to help it cure, and consequently removed after For the study described herein, a total of 12 composite beams
7 days of curing. At that time the protective caps were removed cast using the second batch of concrete were tested. Prior to the
from the top of the dowel connectors and 27 N m 共20 ft lb兲 of beginning of the test, all the beam specimens were conditioned to
torque was applied to the bolts, essentially vertically prestressing 12% wood moisture by first completely submerging the beams in
the concrete, to ensure a better tightness between the concrete and a tank of water for 24 h and then placing them in a climate cham-
the wood layers. The beams were then allowed to further cure ber. Previous attempts to condition them in the climate chamber
until the appropriate tests were conducted. itself proved very excessive in time, as equilibrating times esti-
mated to be several weeks from available literature were greatly
exceeded in the first specimen so that was abandoned as it was
Material Testing
taking away from the time needed to do creep tests themselves.
Physical tests were performed on the wood and concrete in order Thus the expedient of the bath soaking was done to arrive at a
to evaluate their mechanical properties. A nondestructive bending reasonably moist state 共whether exactly 12% or not兲 relative to
test was performed for the second batch of the specimens on the the much drier 6–7% that occurs in Colorado. It is not known if
wood layer of the composite beams after the nailing of the five the entire board was at 12% when removed but likely so, as the
boards and before the cutting of the notches. The test, conducted Delmhorst electrical resistance probes used were 38 mm 共1.5 in.兲
according to Standard D4761-93 共American Society for Testing long and several random locations were used to roughly assess it.
and Materials 1993兲 was performed by applying two equally The environmental chamber was maintained at a constant 68%
spaced point loads of 0.956 kN 共215 lb兲 and measuring the cor- relative humidity and 33° C 共91° F兲 level allowing the beams to
responding midspan deflection. The obtained statistical values of equilibrate at a moisture content level of approximately 12%. The
Young’s modulus are reported in Table 1. Such values measure reason for the environmental conditioning was to increase the
the apparent modulus of elasticity as they also incorporate the very low value of moisture content 共about 5–7%兲 resulting from
shear deformation. The resulting average Young’s modulus of the dry climate in Colorado 共relative humidity RH= 20% or less
8,600 MPa 共1,250 ksi兲 is slightly lower than the recommended in some periods of the year兲. As the stiffness and strength of wood
design value of 8,960 MPa 共1,300 ksi兲 共American Forest and decrease with an increase in moisture content, it was of interest to
Paper Association 2005兲. test the specimen behavior in a more severe environment charac-
A destructive compression test was performed on concrete cyl- terized by higher humidity.
inders to evaluate Young’s modulus. Five and eight cylinders The number of cycles and amplitude of load variation were
were constructed for the first and second batch of beam speci- selected so as to represent the loading case of people entering and
mens, respectively. A local vendor provided the normal weight leaving an office building over the course of a day. A single mid-
ready-made concrete, which had a specified 7.6 cm 共3 in.兲 slump point load oscillating at a set frequency generating a sine wave
and 28 day compressive strength of 27.6 MPa 共4,000 psi兲. The was used to represent the load variation over one cycle. Each
cylinders were then tested to failure after 28 days, in accordance wave would start at a base load of approximately 3.1 kN 共700 lb兲,
with specifications of ASTM C 39/C 39M-01 共American Society representing a load that would always exist in a commercial
for Testing and Materials 2002兲. The obtained statistical values of building 共dead load and part of the live load such as furniture,
the strength are listed in Table 1. Based on the mean compressive computers, etc兲. Upon application of this base load, the load was
strength f ⬘c of 30.5 MPa 共4,430 psi兲 for the first batch and then cycled up to 5.56 kN 共1250 lb兲, and back to 3.1 kN 共700 lb兲

432 / JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / MARCH 2008


19%. At the end of the cyclic test, after only 24 h exposure to the
laboratory environment, a reduction in moisture content of about
0.5% from the previous value of 12% was measured.
The test setup for the cyclic tests was characterized by a three-
point bending with one point load at midspan. Vertical deflections
were monitored at midspan and at the quarter points, whereas
relative slips between wood and concrete were monitored at
the notch locations. After lifting each specimen into place and
installing the string potentiometers, a ramp loading to 5.56 kN
共1,250 lb兲 was applied, follow by unloading to 1.92 kN 共430 lb兲.
A loading–unloading cycle between those values of load was
repeated 7 or 8 times until repeatability of deflections occurred,
followed by unloading to zero. After this preliminary cyclic test
Fig. 3. Load versus midspan deflection for beam specimen RB407 aimed at taking any slack out of the beam specimens, a load
from the preliminary cyclic loading to the beginning of the test to of 5.56 kN 共1,250 lb兲 was applied again, and both the stiffness
failure through the cycle load test and deflection were measured. Then the cyclic loading
共21,600 cycles兲 test was performed, followed by unloading to
for 21,600 cycles. This number corresponds approximately to a zero and by the test to failure. The stiffness was measured again
30-year service life by assuming a daily cycle of loading– during the ramp loading to failure, in the range 0 – 5.56 kN
unloading twice per day. The 5.56 kN load corresponded to 25% 共0 – 1250 lb兲 and contrasted with the stiffness prior the cyclic test,
of the expected failure load. As shown later, this load level was in order to investigate if any degradation in stiffness would take
actually about one-third of the average collapse load of 15.6 kN place due to the repeated loading.
共3,500 lb兲. As an example, the load–midspan deflection plot for Specimen
A cycle rate of 15 cycles/ min was then set so the 21,600 cycle RB407 during the whole series of tests is displayed in Fig. 3. The
repeated load test could be completed in a 24 h time period. Com- lower stiffness during the first loading ramp due to the slack of
pleting the cyclic test in this short of a time period was deemed the specimen is evident. This is, in part, attributed to possible
necessary because once the beams were removed from the envi- initial gaps in the incline of notch due to shrinkage effects as
ronmental chamber, they began to drop in moisture content. The Colorado has a dry climate, and boards used tend to be dry rela-
environmental conditions in the laboratory were characterized by tive to the delivered moisture content. Once a load cycle is ap-
an average temperature of 18° C 共64° F兲 and relative humidity of plied the gap may slip and then increase stiffness as the surface

Table 2. Results of the Cycle Load and Failure Tests Performed on the Specimens Subjected to Repeated Loading
Elastic Elastic Elastic Increase Decrease in
deflect. deflect. deflect. in defl. Stiffness Stiffness stiffness
prior after after after before after after
21,600 10,800 21,600 21,600 21,600 21,600 21,600 Efficiency
load load load load load load load Failure of the
Specimen cycles cycles cycles cycles cycles cycles cycles load Failure connection
number 共mm兲 共mm兲 共mm兲 共%兲 共kN/mm兲 共kN/mm兲 共%兲 共kN兲 type 共%兲
Specimens with flexural failure type
RB301 15.1 17.2 17.8 17.5 0.383 0.354 7.6 13.64 Flexural 59.5
RB303 13.7 15.5 15.9 16.2 0.419 0.396 5.5 11.92 Flexural 66.5
RB306 13.3 15.4 15.7 17.6 0.428 0.382 10.7 15.16 Flexural 52.5
RB309 15.6 17.7 18.3 17.5 0.371 0.335 9.9 9.15 Flexural 54.6
RB402 — — — — — — — 13.20 Flexural 40.6
Average 14.4 16.5 16.9 17.2 0.400 0.367 8.4 12.61 Flexural 54.7
Standard deviation 1.1 1.2 1.3 0.7 0.027 0.027 2.3 2.25 Flexural 9.6
Specimens with block shear failure type
RB310 11.9 13.3 13.9 17.1 0.481 0.472 1.9 16.81 Block shear 60.4
RB401 11.6 13.2 13.7 17.5 0.503 0.429 14.6 18.45 Block shear 68.4
RB403 11.8 13.2 13.7 16.5 0.490 0.463 5.5 18.73 Block shear 69.0
RB404 11.9 13.6 14.1 18.7 0.486 0.411 15.5 18.40 Block shear 66.8
RB406 12.0 14.0 14.4 20.0 0.470 0.428 9.9 16.59 Block shear 58.7
RB407 10.8 12.6 13.0 19.6 0.531 0.470 11.3 18.20 Block shear 69.8
RB408 11.9 13.6 14.1 19.2 0.485 0.429 11.4 17.41 Block shear 58.9
Average 11.7 13.3 13.8 18.4 0.493 0.443 10.0 17.80 Block shear 64.6
Standard deviation 0.4 0.4 0.5 1.4 0.019 0.025 4.9 0.86 Block shear 5.0
Statistical values for all specimens
Average 12.7 14.5 15.0 17.9 0.459 0.416 9.4 15.64 — 60.5
Standard deviation 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.3 0.051 0.051 4.1 3.06 — 8.5

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / MARCH 2008 / 433


Fig. 4. Percentage of increase in midspan deflection during the cycle
load test for Beam Specimen RB407

comes into bearing. Additional loadings would not experience this


as the slip is nonrecoverable. Incidental microgaps in the test
setup at supports and load points are other factors. The elastic Fig. 5. 共a兲 History of environmental relative humidity; 共b兲 history of
deflection and stiffness of the beams due to the loading to temperature during the creep test
5.56 kN 共1,250 lb兲 prior the cycle load test and after the prelimi-
nary 7 or 8 cycles are reported in Table 2 together with the values
of deflection after 10,800 and 21,600 cycles. A significant in- mens were vertically supported at the third points, whereas the
crease in deflection 共18% on average兲 can be noticed after other four specimens were left unshored. The shores were re-
completion of the entire cyclic load test. As can be noted in moved 36 days after the concrete placement, and the deflection
Fig. 3, this increase in deflection is irrecoverable, and may be was monitored during the entire construction process. Then,
caused by progressive damage occurring in the connection detail 185 days after the casting of the specimens, 2 kN 共450 lb兲 con-
due to plastic strain development in the wooden part of the notch crete cylinders were suspended at the third points of the span. The
as a result of repeated loading. total 4 kN 共900 lb兲 load corresponded to an initially estimated
The rate of increase in midspan deflection was higher during 12.5% of the ultimate capacity of the wood-concrete composite
the first cycles than at the end of the cyclic load test, as can be beam. As shown later, this total load applied in the four-point
observed in Fig. 4 and in Table 2. On average, the elastic deflec- bending beam was actually about 17% of the equivalent average
tion increased of 14% during the first 10,800 cycles, and only 4% collapse load of 23.6 kN 共5,300 lb兲 measured on the beams sub-
during the last 10,800 cycles. The attainment of a steady state jected to cyclic tests and then ramp loaded to failure. The equiva-
condition characterized by reduced increase in deflection with the lent average collapse load was calculated by multiplying by 3 / 2
number of cycles is therefore deemed to be applicable to office the actual average collapse load of 15.6 kN 共3,500 lb兲 measured
building floors at the end of the 21,600 cycles. It has to be high- in the three-point bending beams tested to failure. The factor 3 / 2
lighted, however, that this number of cycles is too low to justify represents the ratio between the maximum bending moments in a
any conclusion for structures such as bridges characterized by three- and a four-point bending beam subjected to the same total
higher number 共millions兲 of load cycles. load. The weights were left on the specimens for 133 days, during
The stiffness change due to the cyclic load test was less which period the midspan deflection was monitored on a daily
significant than the increase in deflection. The stiffness values basis.
prior and after the cyclic load test are reported in Table 2 along The creep test results are displayed in Fig. 6 and Table 3. An
with the decrease in stiffness, which was on average 9%. Such a increase in deflection ranging from 52.8 to 60.6% with an average
variation in stiffness may be justified with similar considerations
to those reported before for the increase in deflection. A decrease
in initial stiffness at the beginning of the test to failure with re-
spect to the value prior to the cyclic test can be noted and is
plotted in Fig. 3.

Creep Tests

The purpose of the creep tests was to monitor the increase in


deflection over time due to the construction process and the ap-
plication of sustained load. Further, the reduction in the stiffness
at the end of the creep test was also of interest. Eight beam speci-
mens constructed according to the procedure detailed above were
subjected to this test. The tests were conducted inside the labora-
tory, in uncontrolled environmental conditions. Fig. 5 displays the
history of the environmental relative humidity and temperature Fig. 6. Trend over time of the midspan deflection during the creep
during the creep test. During the concrete placement four speci- test

434 / JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / MARCH 2008


Table 3. Results of the Creep and Failure Tests Performed on the Specimens Subjected to Sustained Load
Stiffness
Elastic Increase at the Stiffness
deflection in defl. beginning at the end Decrease Efficiency
Elastic after 133 after 133 of the of the in Failure Failure of the
Specimen deflection days days creep test creep test stiffness load type connection
number 共mm兲 共mm兲 共%兲 共kN/mm兲 共kN/mm兲 共%兲 共kN兲 — 共%兲
RB501 6.8 10.9 60.1 0.467 0.324 30.6 8.52 Block shear 43.1
RB502 7.2 11.6 60.5 0.445 0.315 29.1 12.39 Block shear 40.8
RB503 8.0 12.6 57.4 — — — — — —
RB504 8.1 12.9 60.6 — — — — — —
RB505 9.3 14.9 60.4 0.343 0.327 4.5 10.47 Block shear 47.0
RB506 11.0 16.9 53.4 0.292 0.315 −8.0 9.82 Block shear 41.7
RB507 7.8 12.1 55.0 — — — — — —
RB508 8.3 12.6 52.8 — — — — — —
Average 8.3 13.1 57.5 0.387 0.320 14.0 10.30 Block shear 43.1
Stand. dev. 1.3 1.9 3.4 0.083 0.006 19.0 1.61 — 2.7

of 57.5% was measured on the beam specimens after the 133 day P1a 3l2 − 4a2
duration of testing. Such an increase in deflection is very similar EIeq = 共1兲
48 ␯1,el
to the values of 66 and 65–70% suggested in literature for, re-
spectively, wood beams 共Forest Products Laboratory 1999兲 and with a = l / 3, l signifying the span length of the beam. Then the
reinforced concrete beams 共Portland Cement Association 2002兲 equivalent stiffness k2 of the beam under one point load at
subjected to sustained load. The increase in deflection in the com- midspan P2 was found by substituting the value of EIeq into the
posite beam specimens due to creep loading is more significant formula for the elastic deflection ␯2,el of a beam subjected to one
than that 共18%兲 due to the repeated live load. Further information point load at midspan
on the outcomes of creep test results including numerical predic-
tion of the deflection at the end of the service life 共30 years兲, P2 48EIeq
k2 = = 共2兲
influence of the construction process 共shored versus unshored兲, ␯2,el l3
and simplified analytical formulas for the evaluation of the long- The calculated values of the stiffness k2 at the beginning of
term deflection are reported in Fragiacomo et al. 共2007兲. the creep test are listed in Table 3 together with the value
At the end of the creep load test, four of the specimens were measured after the creep test during the test to failure, and with
tested to failure. The selections of these specimens was based the percent of decrease in stiffness. An average reduction in
upon their midspan deflection values at the end of the creep load stiffness of 14% can be noted. This result, however, can be
test, seeking two beams with minimum 共RB501 and RB502兲 and considered only as a qualitative outcome as the range of change
two beams with maximum 共RB505 and RB506兲 midspan deflec- in stiffness is quite wide 共from 30.6% reduction to 8% increase兲
tion. The other four specimens were left loaded under the sus- and the number of specimens is low 共only four兲. Further, the
tained load in order to obtain more experimental creep data over stiffness prior to the creep test was calculated based on the elastic
time. The same test setup as that described for the cyclic test was midspan deflection induced by the application of the concrete
used for the test to failure. The stiffness of the specimens during weights applied on the beams in one increment. The absence of
the ramp loading to the service point load of 4 kN 共900 lb兲 after the preliminary load cycles may have led to a slight underestima-
the creep test was measured and contrasted with the stiffness of tion of the beam stiffness prior to the creep load test. The physical
the specimens during the loading with the concrete weights at the reason for this decrease in stiffness may be a progressive damage
beginning of the creep test. Due to the need to cast the specimen occurring in the connection detail due to irrecoverable creep
on top of an elevated concrete frame in order to perform the creep strains and plastic strains caused by the sustained load in the
tests and to monitor the deflection during the construction pro- wood notch.
cess, the initial stiffness was not evaluated for the same type of
load 共concentrated load, three-point bending兲 as for the failure
test. In actuality, during the creep test the specimens were loaded Collapse Tests
with two concentrated loads corresponding to a four-point bend-
ing test. Further, preliminary load cycles could not be readily All the 12 beam specimens subjected to the cyclic load tests and
performed before the creep test, as was done for the cyclic tests in four of the beam specimens subjected to the creep load tests were
order to reach repeatability of deflection, as the large, heavy dead subsequently ramp loaded to failure using the same experimental
weight cylinders would have to be taken on and off several times. setup 共three-point bending兲 described in the previous section for
That would have also disturbed the specimen each time. the cyclic load tests.
However, based on the midspan deflection ␯1,el measured Similar to results reported in Gutkowski et al. 共2007兲, five
during the application of the two point loads P1 at the beginning beams 共see Table 2兲 failed at or near the midspan due to the
of the creep test, the equivalent flexural stiffness EIeq of the flexural tension limit being exceeded at the bottom 共wood兲 por-
composite beam was evaluated tion of the beam 共referred to as the “flexural failure”兲 as shown in

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / MARCH 2008 / 435


Fig. 7. Midspan flexural tension failure
Fig. 9. Block shear failure of the wood notch

Fig. 7. Fig. 8 illustrates a typical load versus midspan deflection Fig. 12 displays the load-midspan deflection plots for all speci-
diagram for this type of failure 共specimen RB303兲 together with mens tested to failure by distinguishing between beams previ-
the stiffness of the specimen prior to the cyclic load test. The ously tested under load cycles and beams previously tested under
comparison between the curves prior and after the cyclic load test creep load. Tables 2 and 3 summarize the stiffness, failure loads
provides a further confirmation that the reduction in stiffness due and types for the beams previously subjected to cycle and creep
to the repeated live load was quite small. Two major features can tests, respectively. In the same tables, also the efficiency EFF of
be seen in Fig. 8, namely the initial stiffness of the beam exhib- the connection system as measured during the collapse test is
ited a fairly linear load–deflection diagram until a sudden failure reported. Such a quantity measures the amount of composite ac-
is induced at which time the beam loses much of its load carrying tion observed as a proportion of the maximum available, and is
capacity. defined by the formula
There was another failure type that occurred more frequently
共in seven specimens兲 than the midspan failure type, namely a ␯abs − ␯
EFF = ⫻ 100 共3兲
block shear failure of the wood notch. This failure mode would be ␯abs − ␯full
initiated by a crack or splitting of the wood starting at the base of
where ␯, ␯abs, and ␯full signify, respectively, the experimental
the notch nearest the end running parallel to the grain of wood
deflection, the theoretical deflection in the case of no connection,
until it reached the end of the beam, as shown in Fig. 9. When
and the theoretical deflection in the case of fully rigid connection
the block shear failure occurred, the load carrying capacity of
between concrete and wood over the entire length of the inter-
the beam decreased significantly but remained high enough to
layer. The theoretical deflections ␯abs and ␯full were calculated
induce a secondary mode of failure, namely a flexural failure at
by summing the flexural stiffness of concrete and wood, and
the bottom of the wood layer at midspan 共Wieligmann et al.
by using the method of the transformed section, respectively.
2004兲. Fig. 10 illustrates a typical load versus midspan deflection
The load–midspan deflection curves for the theoretical cases of
diagram for this type of failure 共specimen RB407兲. Fig. 11 depicts
fully rigid and fully flexible connection are displayed in Figs. 8
the load vs. slip at the notch location for the same specimen. The
and 10 for Specimens RB303 and RB407, respectively. The
extremely low values of slip provide a further indication of the
values of the mechanical properties measured for wood and
effectiveness of the notched connection detail.
concrete were used in this calculation. The efficiency was calcu-

Fig. 8. Load–midspan deflection curves during the test to failure of Fig. 10. Load–midspan deflection curves during the test to failure of
the RB303 beam specimen, and comparison with the stiffness prior the RB407 beam specimen, and comparison with the stiffness prior
the cycle load tests, and with the limit cases of fully rigid and fully the cycle load tests, and with the limit cases of fully rigid and fully
flexible connection flexible connection

436 / JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / MARCH 2008


Fig. 11. Load–slip curves in the notched connectors during the test to
failure of the RB407 beam specimen Fig. 12. Load–deflection curves during the test to failure for all beam
specimens

Concluding Remarks
lated by fitting the load–midspan deflection curve prior to the
failure with the best-fit straight line, and calculating the quantities The paper reports the outcomes of a stage of research in an
␯, ␯abs, and ␯full for the same value of load. It has to be pointed extensive experimental program ongoing at CSU. A number of
out, however, that the Young’s modulus of the wood used for the layered wood–concrete composite beam specimens with notched
creep test beams was not measured. Therefore, the average value connection detail were conditioned to 12% moisture content and
measured on the wood used for the cyclic load test was used in then subjected to 21,600 cycles of loading–unloading to about
those beams. one-third of the average failure load. The span of 368 cm 共12 ft
The efficiency of connection was found to be fairly high, de- and 1 in.兲 is the maximum length available for a U.S. standard
spite the few number of notches cut along the beam and, there- 2 ⫻ 4 共1.5 in.⫻ 3.5 in.兲 dimension lumber cross-section. For
fore, the relatively inexpensiveness of the connection needed. The longer spans, a larger size is needed for that reason alone, to avoid
efficiency was noted to be lower for the specimens previously unacceptable discontinuities in the span. Creep behavior might
subjected to the creep test 共43.1% on average兲 than for the speci- differ as well. The purpose of the conditioning to 12% was to
mens previously tested under cycle loading 共60.5% on average兲, increase the equilibrium moisture content in the wood, usually
despite the environmental conditioning of the former specimens around 5–7% in Colorado. The number of cycles was chosen so
to 12% moisture level. The former value, however, suffers from as to represent the live load variations expected in an office build-
the uncertainty on the actual value of the Young’s modulus of ing over the 30 year service life. At the end of the cycle load test,
wood as that quantity was not measured and the average Young’s all the beams were ramp loaded to failure. Other beams were
modulus for the wood measured in the other batch of specimens subjected to creep load test lasting for 133 days in unconditioned
was used. environment and then tested to failure. The stiffness of the beams
A small reduction in efficiency can be recognized in the beams prior and after the cyclic loading and creep tests were compared
subjected to cyclic load tests that failed with flexural failure type and the efficiency of the connection calculated. All material prop-
共54.7%兲 compared with those failing with block shear type erties 共Young’s modulus of wood and concrete兲 were evaluated by
共64.5%—Table 2兲. This result is consistent with the analytical/ experimental tests.
numerical outcomes predicted by Wieligmann et al. 共2004兲. Con- The primary observations are: 共1兲 the repetition of the live
sequently, the failure load of 12.6 kN 共2,830 lb兲 for the flexural load led to an irrecoverable increase in deflection at the end of the
failure type was on average significantly lower with respect to the 21,600 load cycles on average equal to 18% of the initial elastic
17.8 kN 共4,000 lb兲 for the block shear failure type 共see Table 2兲. deflection. This increase in deflection approached a sort of steady-
This outcome is also attributed to the observation that all beams state characterized by limited increase as the cycles approached
with flexural failure type had a noticeable defect in the wood the 21,600 cycles test limit. However, this result cannot be gen-
共knot, crack兲 located at or near the midspan. This defect likely eralized for structures where the number of cycles may be of the
prevented the beam from fully exploiting its flexural load capacity order of millions like for major highway bridges or order of 100s
and led to an early failure in bending which occurred prior the of thousands for rural bridge locations; 共2兲 on average, the de-
attainment of the block shear failure. crease in stiffness after the cyclic load tests was found to be 9%.
The creep specimens had no noticeable defects at or around This decrease in stiffness, together with the increase in deflection,
the midspan and all exhibited block shear failure type. The failure may be caused by a progressive damage occurring in the connec-
load of 10.3 kN 共2,320 lb兲 was significantly lower compared with tion detail due to plastic strain development in the wood notch as
the value of 17.8 kN 共4,000 lb兲 for the cyclic loaded specimens a result of repeated loading; 共3兲 the sustained load increased the
with block shear failure types. Even though definitive conclusions deflection far more 共57.5%兲 than what the repeated load did
cannot be drawn due to the small number of specimens tested, a 共18%兲; 共4兲 a reduction in stiffness, slightly larger than that for the
sustained load seems to have a more significant effect in terms of cyclic loaded specimens, was also observed for the specimens
stiffness and strength reduction than 21,600 cycles of loading- subjected to the creep test. The physical reason for this decrease
unloading together with an increase in wood moisture content in stiffness may be a progressive damage in the wood notch due
from 5–7% to 12%. to irrecoverable creep strains and plastic strains caused by the

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / MARCH 2008 / 437


sustained load; 共5兲 two types of failure were observed during the mens.” ASTM C 39/C 39M-01, Vol. 04.02, ASTM International, West
collapse tests: midspan bending failure of the wood layer, where Conshohocken, Pa., 21–25.
defects were noticed at or around midspan of the beam, and shear Bathon, L., and Graf, M. 共2000兲. “A continuous wood-concrete-
block failure, characterized by a shear split running from the composite system.” Proc., 6th World Conf. on Timber Engineering
notch to the end of the beam, suddenly followed by bending fail- WCTE 2000 共CD-ROM兲, Whistler Resort, B.C., Canada.
ure at midspan; 共6兲 the efficiency of connection was found to be Brunner, M., and Schnuriger, M. 共2006兲. “Adhesive connection for
fairly high 共40.8–69.8%兲, despite the few number of notches timber-concrete composite.” Proc., 9th World Conf. on Timber Engi-
共four兲 cut along the beam; and 共7兲 the failure load and efficiency neering WCTE 2006 共CD-ROM兲, Portland, Ore.
of connection of the specimens subjected to creep load test were Ceccotti, A. 共1995兲. “Timber-concrete composite structures.” Timber
found to be 42 and 33% lower, respectively, compared to the engineering, step 2, 1st Ed., Centrum Hout, Almere, The Netherlands,
cycle loaded specimens with the same failure 共shear block兲 type, E13/1–E13/12.
in spite of the latter beam specimens being conditioned to a Ceccotti, A., Fragiacomo, M., and Giordano, S. 共2007兲. “Long-term
higher value of moisture content. Even though a final conclusion and collapse tests on a timber-concrete composite beam with glued-in
connection.” Mater. Struct., 40共1兲, 15–25.
cannot be drawn, a sustained load seems to have a more signifi-
Clouston, P., Bathon, L. A., and Schreyer, A. 共2005兲. “Shear and bending
cant effect in terms of stiffness and strength reduction than the
performance of a novel wood–concrete composite system.” J. Struct.
21,600 cycles of loading–unloading due to the live load. Eng., 131共9兲, 1404–1412.
Further research needs to be carried out to reach definitive Deam, B. L., Fragiacomo, M., and Buchanan, A. H. 共2007兲. “Connections
conclusions on some of the issues discussed above. In particular: for composite concrete slab and LVL flooring systems.” Mater.
共1兲 more creep tests need to be performed by measuring the stiff- Struct., published online.
ness prior and after the creep test; 共2兲 more cyclic load tests Dias, A. M. P. G., Lopes, S. M. R., Van de Kuilen, J. W. G., and Cruz, H.
should be performed on specimens subjected to uncontrolled en- M. P. 共2007兲. “Load-carrying capacity of timber-concrete joints with
vironmental conditions, in order to assess the influence of the dowel-type fasteners.” J. Struct. Eng., 133共5兲, 720–727.
wood moisture content on the beam behavior; 共3兲 a combination Dias, A. M. P. G., Van de Kuilen, J. W. G., Cruz, H. M. P., and Lopes, S.
of cyclic loading and creep tests should be conducted on beam M. R. 共2006兲. “Densified veneer wood for notched joints in timber
specimens which would then be subjected to ramp load test to concrete composite structures.” Proc., 9th World Conf. on Timber En-
failure; and 共4兲 the actual upper limit of the composite action gineering WCTE 2006 共CD-ROM兲, Portland, Ore.
corresponds to infinitely rigid discrete connectors, as no adhesive Döhrer, A., and Rautenstrauch, K. 共2006兲. “Connectors for timber-
was used between the layers. The use of such an upper limit concrete composite-bridges.” Proc., Meeting 39 of the Working Com-
would be more realistic in the computation of the efficiency of mission W18-Timber Structures, CIB, Int. Council for Research and
connection. A rigorous computer model is needed to examine that Inn., Florence, Italy, paper CIB-W18/39-7-3.
but, obviously the efficiency values would increase for that refer- Fast, R. S., Gutkowski, R. M., Criswell, M. E., and Radford, D. W.
ence point. 共2003兲. “Durability studies of layered wood-concrete connections and
beams.” Structural Research Rep. No. 84, Dept. of Civil Engineering,
Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Forest Products Laboratory. 共1999兲. “Wood handbook—Wood as an
Acknowledgments engineering material.” General Technical Rep. No. FPL-GTR-113,
Forest Products Laboratory, Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service,
The Borden Chemical Inc., company provided a needed supply of Madison, Wis.
its adhesive. The writers graciously acknowledge the initial sup- Fragiacomo, M., Amadio, C., and Macorini, L. 共2007兲. “Short- and long-
port for the project granted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture term performance of the Tecnaria stud connector for timber-concrete
共Grant No. 9503803兲 as related to floor construction. The U.S. composite beams.” Mater. Struct., 40共10兲, 1013–1026.
Department of Transportation provided support for later studies Fragiacomo, M., Gutkowski, R. M., Balogh, J., and Fast, R. S. 共2007兲.
related to possible application in bridges. That funding was via “Long-term behavior of wood-concrete composite floor/deck systems
the Mountain Plains Consortium, which is federally sponsored with shear key connection detail.” J. Struct. Eng., 133共9兲, 1307–1315.
through the University Transportation Centers Program. The con- Gelfi, P., Giuriani, E., and Marini, A. 共2002兲. “Stud shear connection
tents reflect the views of the writers only, and the above- design for composite concrete slab and wood beams.” J. Struct. Eng.,
mentioned agencies assume no liability for the contents or use 128共12兲, 1544–1550.
Grantham, R., Enjily, V., Fragiacomo, M., Nogarol, C., Zidaric, I., and
thereof.
Amadio, C. 共2004兲. “Potential upgrade of timber frame buildings in
the UK using timber-concrete composites.” Proc., 8th World Conf. on
Timber Engineering WCTE 2004, Vol. 2, Lahti, Finland, 59–64.
References Gutkowski, R. M., Brown, K., Shigidi, A., and Natterer, J. 共2004兲.
“Investigation of notched composite wood-concrete connections.”
Ahmadi, B. H., and Saka, M. P. 共1993兲. “Behavior of composite timber- J. Struct. Eng., 130共10兲, 1553–1561.
concrete floors.” J. Struct. Eng., 119共11兲, 3111–3130. Gutkowski, R. M., Brown, K., Shigidi, A., and Natterer, J. 共2007兲. “Labo-
American Concrete Institute. 共2002兲. “Building code requirements for ratory tests of composite wood-concrete beams.” Constr. Build.
structural concrete and Commentary.” ACI 318-02 and ACI 318R-02 Mater., published online.
Farmington Hills, Mich. Gutkowski, R. M., Fast, R. S., Balogh, J., and Fragiacomo, M. 共2006兲.
American Forest and Paper Association. 共2005兲. “National design speci-
“Time-dependent load performance of notched wood-concrete
fication for wood construction.” ANSI/AF&PA NDS-2005, AF&PA
composite beams.” Proc., Structural Faults+ Repair-2006 Conf.,
American Wood Council, Washington, D.C.
American Society for Testing and Materials 共ASTM兲. 共1993兲. “Standard Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K.
test methods for mechanical properties of lumber and wood-based Jorge, L., Lopes, S., and Cruz, H. 共2006兲. “Castellated surface for timber-
structural material.” ASTM Standard D4761-93, Philadelphia. concrete composite connections.” Proc., 9th World Conf. on Timber
American Society for Testing and Materials 共ASTM兲. 共2002兲. “Standard Engineering WCTE 2006 共CD-ROM兲, Portland, Ore.
test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete speci- Kuhlmann, U., and Michelfelder, B. 共2006兲. “Optimized design of

438 / JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / MARCH 2008


grooves in timber-concrete composite slabs.” Proc., 9th World Conf. Portland Cement Association. 共2002兲. Design and control of concrete
on Timber Engineering WCTE 2006 共CD-ROM兲, Portland, Ore. mixtures, 14th Ed., Skokie, Ill.
Lukaszewska, E., Johnsson, H., and Fragiacomo, M. 共2007兲. “Perfor- Schänzlin, J. 共2003兲. “About the time dependent behavior of composite of
mance of connections for prefabricated timber-concrete composite board stacks and concrete.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Stuttgart, Stuttgart,
floors.” Mater. Struct., in press. Germany 共in German兲.
Natterer, J., Hamm, J., and Favre, P. 共1996兲. “Composite wood-concrete Steinberg, E., Selle, R., and Faust, T. 共2003兲. “Connectors for timber-
floors for multi-story buildings.” Proc., Int. Wood Engineering Conf., lightweight concrete composite structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 129共11兲,
New Orleans, 3431–3435. 1538–1545.
Negrão, J. H., Oliveira, F. M., and Oliveira, C. L. 共2006兲. “Investigation Weaver, C. A., Davids, W. G., and Dagher, H. J. 共2004兲. “Testing and
on timber-concrete glued composites.” Proc., 9th World Conf. on Tim- analysis of partially composite fiber-reinforced polymer-glulam-
ber Engineering WCTE 2006 共CD-ROM兲, Portland, Ore. concrete bridge girders.” J. Bridge Eng., 9共4兲, 316–325.
Piazza, M., and Ballerini, M. 共2000兲. “Experimental and numerical results Wieligmann, M., Gutkowski, R. M., and Haller, P. 共2004兲. “Strain-stress-
on timber-concrete composite floors with different connection sys- behavior of dowel connections for partially composite wood-concrete
tems.” Proc., 6th World Conf. on Timber Engineering 共CD-ROM兲, floors and decks.” Structural Research Rep. No. 87, Dept. of Civil
Whistler Resort, B.C., Canada. Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / MARCH 2008 / 439

View publication stats

Potrebbero piacerti anche