ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Te

I. SCHOOL PROFILE/DATA

Instruction: Please input required data/information in unshaded cells. Fill-in only the grade levels that are applicable to your school. This template aims to organ
existing school and community data from different sources. If you find it useful to lift data from other templates and transfer it here, you may do so. Otherwise,
just attach the other data templates to this form.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
School ID: 109487 Name of School: GUITNANGBAYAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Address: GSIS Rd. Guitnangbayan I, SMR Barangay: Guitnangbayan I
District: San Mateo Municipality: San Mateo
Division: Rizal Region: IV-A CALABARZON

A. GEOGRAPHY
A.1 Location of the School. Check the appropriate description.
✘ Along the highway Near a river or waterway On top of a mountain
Near the coastline By the hillside

A.2 Relative Distance of the School

Distance in km Mode of Transporta

a. From the poblacion 0.6 walking

b. From the nearest public elementary school 1.3 tricycle ride
c. From the nearest private elementary school 0.5 tricycle ride
d. From the nearest public secondary school 0.2 walking
e. From the nearest private secondary school 0.4 walking
f. From the District Office 1 tricycle ride
g. From the Division Office 24 jeepney rides

A.3 Incidence of crimes and other human-induced hazards

A.3.1 Check if there have been incidences of the following in the last 3 years.
Armed conflict as a result of organized crime (terrorism, siege, etc.)
Crime against school head/s (murder/homicide, physical injury, rape, sexual harassment, etc.)
✘ Crime against school property (theft, robbery, arson)
Crime against student/s (murder/homicide, physical injury, rape, sexual harassment, etc.)
Crime against teacher/s (murder/homicide, physical injury, rape, sexual harassment, etc.)
Fire (Electrical wiring failure, etc.)
✘ Health Threat (i.e. Dengue, Malaria, Measles, food poisoning, disease outbreak)
Oil Spill
Security threat as a result of civilian violence (bomb threats, kidnapping threats, hostage taking, shooting, etc.)
Structural collapse (as a result of engineering failures)
Others. Pls. Specify: ______________

A.3.2 What are the 3 most frequent crimes/human-induced hazards?

1st most frequent: _____ Thef
2nd most frequent: _____ Dengue, Measles, Influenza
3rd most frequent: ____ Chicken Pox

A.4 Incidence of natural hazards

A.4.1 Check if there have been incidences of the following in the last 3 years.
Drought ✘ Tropical Cyclones (Storm, Typhoon, Tropical Depression, etc.)
Earthquake Oil Spill
Fire (includes forest fires and fires due to natural disasters) Tsunami
✘ Flood Volcanic eruption
Landslide Others. Pls. specify: ______________

Storm surge
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Te
Storm surge

A.4.2 What are the 3 most frequent natural hazards?

1st most frequent: _____ Tropical Cyclones
2nd most frequent: _____ Typhoon/Habagat
3rd most frequent: _________________________________

A.5 Result of disaster incidents

✘ School used as an evacuation center in the last 3 years

B. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
B.1 Classrooms and seats
B.1.1 Classroom quantity [SRC.15.]
No. of Classrooms
Level Total Enrollment,
Current SY For Repair/
In Good Condition Rehabilitation Total Learner:classroom ratio 1
Kindergarten 492 4 1 5 98.4:1
Grade 1 560 7 0 7 80:1
Grade 2 426 4 0 4 106.5:1
Grade 3 460 4 0 4 115:1
Grade 4 534 5 0 5 106.8:1
Grade 5 575 8 0 8 71.88:1
Grade 6 457 7 0 7 65.29:1
TOTAL 3504 39 1 40 87.6:1
1
Learner:classroom ratio = Total enrollment divided by the total number of classrooms

B.1.2 Classroom seat quantity [SRC.17.] Indicate the total number of seats in all classrooms.

Number Learner:seat ratio 2

3505 1:1
2
Learner:seat ratio = Total enrollment divided by the total number of seats

B.2 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) facilities

B.2.1 Water supply/source. Check as appropriate.
✘ Local piped water ✘ Rainwater catchments Without available water supply
Water well/deep well ✘ Natural source
Is the main source of water functional at present?
✘ YES NO Pls. cite reasons why: ______________________________________________

B.2.2 Handwashing. Is there space for handwashing?

✘ YES If YES: ✘ with soap without soap
NO

B.2.3 Functional toilets [SRC.16.] B.2.4 Toilet bowls

Male Female Male Female
Number Ratio 3 Number Ratio 3 Number Ratio 4 Number Ratio 4
1905 71:1 1600 59:1 1905 71:1 1600 59:1
3
Learner:toilet ratio = Total enrollment divided by number of toilets
4
Learner:toilet bowl ratio = Total enrollment divided by number of toilet bowls
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Te

B.3 Textbooks. Indicate number of textbooks per grade level and subject [SRC.3.]
ENGLISH FILIPINO MATH MTB MAPEH
Level
Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number
Kindergarten 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 1 393 1.42:1 490 1.14:1 382 1.47:1 490 1.14:1 400
Grade 2 400 1.07:1 390 1.09:1 400 1.07:1 390 1.09:1 893
Grade 3 889 0.52:1 420 1.1:1 899 0.51:1 413 1.11:1 690
Grade 4 410 1.3:1 423 1.26:1 410 1.3:1 0 0 448
Grade 5 450 1.28:1 450 1.28:1 566 1.02:1 0 0 360
Grade 6 0 0 0 0 366 1.25:1 0 0 0
TOTAL 2542 1.38:1 2173 1.61:1 3023 1.16:1 1293 2.71:1 2791

AP ESP SCIENCE EPP

Level
Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio
Kindergarten 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 1 526 0.01:1 588 0:1 0 0 0 0
Grade 2 400 0.01:1 400 0:1 0 0 0 0
Grade 3 400 0.01:1 413 0:1 400 0:1 0 0
Grade 4 410 0.01:1 410 0:1 410 0:1 410 0:01
Grade 5 450 0.02:1 450 0:1 468 0:1 329 0.02:1
Grade 6 0 0 427 0:1 0 0:1 282 1.25:1
TOTAL 2186 0.02:1 2688 0:1 1278 0.03:1 1021 0.02:1

B.4 Library:
No. of books: 1170
No. of tables: 5
No. of chairs: 54

Give additional information and qualitative descriptions of the library (on the lighting, space, other fixtures present, etc.)
The SLRC has been renovated this school year giving the pupils a better place for learning. It is a well-ventilated and lighted room.
It can seat 50 learners/whole class. A projector is also available for use by the teachers and pupils.

B.5 Other learning facilities/materials (Example: computers, science equipment. Insert new rows if necessary.)
Facility/Material Number Qualitative description/condition
COMPUTERS 31 some units are still working, needs reformatting and reprogramming
SCIENCE EQUIPMENT all units are in good condition
LED TV 2 one unit is no more functional
PROJECTORS 2 one unit is no more functional

B.6 Availability of electrical supply. What is the school's source of electricity?

✘ Grid supply
Off-grid supply
Solar power
Generator
Others. Pls. specify: ___________
No source of electricity

B.7 Internet connectivity

B.7.1 Are there Internet service providers in the area?
✘ YES NO
If YES, check the appropriate Internet service provider/s servicing the area:
BAYANTEL GLOBE SMART WIT Global (Satellite)
DIGITEL ✘ PLDT SUN Others. Pls. specify: _____________
 DIGITEL ✘ PLDT SUN ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Te
Others. Pls. specify: _____________

B.7.2 Does the school subscribe to any of the Internet service provider/s listed above?
✘ YES NO

B.7.3 Are there Internet café/shops/WiFi-enabled stations in the area?

✘ YES Pls. specify: __________________________________________
NO

C. TEACHERS
C.1 Number of teachers [SRC.14.]
C.1.1 Number of nationally-funded teachers (current SY)

Male Female TOTAL Learner:teacher ratio 5

12 73 85 1:41
5
Learner:teacher ratio = Total enrollment divided by number of nationally-funded teachers

C.1.2 Number of locally-funded teachers and subsidized/volunteer teachers (current SY):

No. of Locally-funded Teachers: 0
No. of Subsidized/ Volunteer Teachers: 0

C.2 Quality of teachers

C.2.1 Number of master teachers
Carries Full-Time Class Teaching Assigned Assigned Part-Time to Class Assigned Full-Time to Ancillary
Position Number Load Grade Teaching Services
(YES/NO) Levels (YES/NO) (YES/NO)
Master Teacher IV 0
Master Teacher III 0
Master Teacher II 2 YES Grade 5-6 No No
Master Teacher I 6 YES Grade 1-6 No No

C.2.2 Number of teachers meeting the desired competencies based on NCBTS

SY Before Previous SY: 2016- Previous SY: Current SY:
2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Total No. of Teachers 63 72 85
No. of Teachers meeting the standards 63 72 73
% meeting the standards 100.00% 100.00% 85.88%

C.2.3 Projects/interventions implemented to improve basic competencies of teachers

YES NO If YES, please describe
a. Does the school have mechanisms for sustained
school-based training? / The school conducts INSET

b. Does the school use the result of the NCBTS-

Teacher's Strength and Needs Assessment as basis for The school allows teachers to attend externally sponsored trainings. O
planning? / endorsed teachers who want to attent National/International Training
Division Office for permission.

c. Are there other interventions implemented to The district/division provides Division and District Based Training/Wor
improve competencies of teachers? / for the teachers.

C.2.4 If the response to C.2.3.b is YES, list down the top 3 training needs mentioned and indicate the number of teachers
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Te
trained on these [SRC.4.]
SY Before Previous SY: 2016- Previous SY: Current SY:
2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Training Needs
% of No. of
No. of Teachers teachers Teachers % of teachers No. of Teachers % of teachers
trained trained trained trained trained trained

Top 1: TRAINING IN ICT 63 100.00% 72 100.00% 73 100.00%

Top 2: CONTENT and PEDAGOGY 60 95.24% 72 100.00% 73 100.00%
Top 3: CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT/ LEADERSHIP 63 100.00% 72 100.00% 73 85.88%

C.2.5 If teachers weren't trained based on identified needs (as seen in C.2.4), cite reasons for the lack of training.

D. CHILDREN HEALTH AND SAFETY

D.1 Nutritional status [SRC.2.]
D.1.1 Number of malnourished children for the current SY
Wasted Severely Wasted
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female

Kindergarten 80 40 40 75 39 36

Grade 1 74 31 43 36 26 10
Grade 2 58 40 18 34 27 7
Grade 3 65 38 27 47 34 13
Grade 4 37 23 14 18 14 4
Grade 5 32 17 15 21 14 7
Grade 6 38 20 18 14 7 7
Total 384 209 175 245 161 84
Percent of Total 54.43% 45.57% 65.71% 34.29%

D.1.2 Projects/interventions implemented in the previous SY addressing malnourished children (insert new rows if necessary)
Project/intervention Number of Children Covered
The school conducted feeding program to address the SW and Wasted pupils. 629 pupils
The SBFP Coor conducted an orientation and met with the parents of the 629 parents/guardians
beneficiaries and discussed with them with the needs of their children.

D.2 Health status [SRC.2.]

D.2.1 Number of children who have other health problems for the current SY. Indicate common ailments and corresponding number of children per
type of ailment based on results of physical and dental examinations. Insert new columns if necessary.
Types of Ailments (Current SY)
Level Other Skin Pale Error of
Tinea Flava Scabies Pediculosis Squinling Style/Hordendum Cervical E.G
Disease Conjunctiva Refraction
Kindergarten
Grade 1 4 5 3 68 43 2 3 4 18
Grade 2 8 4 43 25 5 4 5
Grade 3 14 2 1 46 21 4 2 2
Grade 4 12 1 4 43 51 21 1 3 15
Grade 5
Grade 6
TOTAL 38 8 12 200 140 28 8 13 40
….continuation of table d.1.2
Types of Ailments (Current SY)
Level Distended Abdominal
Dental Carries colds cough Dirty Teeth Dirty Ears Cleft Lip Warts Eczema
Parasitism
Kindergarten
Grade 1 93 64 36 8 96 26 1
Grade 2 89 46 18 6 78 26 3 2
Grade 3 85 48 12 3 17 16 1
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Te
Grade 4 89 61 32 71 39 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
TOTAL 356 219 98 17 262 107 2 7 2

D.2.2 Projects/interventions implemented in the previous SY addressing needs of children with other health problems (insert new rows if necessary)

Project/intervention Number of Children Covered

The teachers integrated the importance of taking care of oneself and proper 3505
hygiene in their lessons.

D.3 Children reported as victims of abuse and violence

D.3.1 Number of children who were recorded victims of abuse and violence (physical, verbal, and sexual). Should be supported by data from the
Guidance Office/teachers.
Previous SY ___ Current SY ___
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female

Kindergarten 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent of Total 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

D.3.2 Projects/interventions implemented for children that were victims or suspected victims of abuse

YES NO If YES, please describe the mechanisms Number of Children Covered

a. Does the school have
mechanisms to promote safe
and protective practices
based on DepED's Policy on
Child Protection in School?

b. Other interventions
implemented for children
that were victims or
suspected victims of abuse
(insert new rows if
necessary)

E. STATUS OF PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS OR CI PROJECTS [SRC.18. & SRC.19.]

These projects include those implemented by the school and other stakeholders. Insert new rows if necessary.
Duration Status/Accomplishments
Indicate progress of the program/ project, and its effect/
Implementer Program/Project Title Target children's access to quality education.
Start End

Teachers Project Star August March 138 Gr. 3 English NR's 83% success rate
Teachers Project Yaman August April 39 Gr.2 NR's 87% success rate
Tecahers Project Lingap August January 629 Clients 77% success rate

F. STAKEHOLDER SUPPORT TO EDUCATION [SRC.13.]

Indicate the amount of contributions made by parents/guardians and other stakeholders for co-curricular activities, extra-curricular
activities, and other major activities (such as meetings and assemblies), as well as stakeholder attendance during these activities.
Contributions Attendance
Activity
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Te
Activity Volunteer No. of Attendance
Cash In Kind No. invited
hours attendees rate
Co-Curricular Activities
CONTEST 42 1500 service, snacks 20 12 167%
SCOUTING 60 5000 tents, supplies 8 4 200%
ASSEMBLIES 23 snacks 20 20 100%
Extra-curricular Activities

cleaning supplies,
BRIGADA ESKWELA 27,005 ₱ 804,928.00 paint, construction 5401 3500 154%
materials,

DRUM & LYRE 60 1,500 instrument repairs 50 50 100%

OFF CAMPUS ACTIVITIES 13 31,000 900 3,000 30%
Other Major Activities
EDUC SUMMIT 5 2,000 2,900 69%
ORIENTATION 16 300 300 100%
CLOSING PROGRAM 5 1500 3000 50%

G. FUND SOURCES [SRC.5.]

Fund Source Amount
General Appropriations Act (School MOOE) 141,000
General Appropriations Act (Subsidy for Special Programs) 100,000
Local Government Unit funds 100,000
Canteen funds 500,000.00
Donations 2,176,989.00
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template

n only the grade levels that are applicable to your school. This template aims to organize
eful to lift data from other templates and transfer it here, you may do so. Otherwise, you can

Mode of Transportation

walking
tricycle ride
tricycle ride
walking
walking
tricycle ride
jeepney rides
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template

MAPEH
Ratio
0
0.02:1
0:1
0.01:1
0
0
0
0.01:1

Qualitative description/condition
some units are still working, needs reformatting and reprogramming
all units are in good condition
one unit is no more functional
one unit is no more functional
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template

If YES, please describe

The school conducts INSET

The school allows teachers to attend externally sponsored trainings. Our SH

endorsed teachers who want to attent National/International Trainings to the
Division Office for permission.

The district/division provides Division and District Based Training/Workshops

for the teachers.
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template

olders. Insert new rows if necessary.

Status/Accomplishments
Indicate progress of the program/ project, and its effect/impact on
children's access to quality education.

83% success rate

87% success rate
77% success rate
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template

II. SITUATION OF CHILDREN / LEARNERS: ACCESS - IN AND OUT OF SCHOOL

Instruction: Please input required data/information in unshaded cells. Fill-in only the age groups/grade levels that are applicable to your
school.

1. CHILDREN NOT IN SCHOOL

1.1 Population of children in the barangay where school is located (current SY)
Total Population No. of children NOT in School % of children NOT in School
Age
Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total
4 193 226 419 139 153 292 72.02% 67.70% 69.69%
5 155 132 287 37 26 63 23.87% 19.70% 21.95%
6 131 155 286 27 13 40 20.61% 8.39% 13.99%
7 206 210 416 9 15 24 4.37% 7.14% 5.77%
8 119 155 274 7 8 15 5.88% 5.16% 5.47%
9 213 229 442 6 10 16 2.82% 4.37% 3.62%
10 218 201 419 6 7 13 2.75% 3.48% 3.10%
11 223 162 385 7 9 16 3.14% 5.56% 4.16%
12 117 122 239 11 13 24 9.40% 10.66% 10.04%
13 101 77 178 18 19 37 17.82% 24.68% 20.79%
14 244 132 376 21 17 38 8.61% 12.88% 10.11%
15 103 120 223 14 15 29 13.59% 12.50% 13.00%
16 183 185 368 17 19 36 9.29% 10.27% 9.78%
17 151 167 318 23 21 44 15.23% 12.57% 13.84%
GRAND TOTAL 2357 2273 4630 342 345 687 14.51% 15.18% 14.84%

1.2 Reasons for not attending school in the current SY 6

No. of children NOT in school according to reasons
No. of school-
Age aged children Distance of
Financial Health and Child Labor School from Affected by Affected by Disability Other
not in school Matters Nutrition Disaster Conflict Reasons
Home
4 292 95 84 29 18 66
5 63 34 17 6 6
6 40 24 8 7 1
7 24 11 6 5 1 1
8 15 6 5 1 3
9 16 7 5 2 2
10 13 3 3 3 2 2
11 16 8 4 1 3
12 24 11 2 8 1 2
13 37 18 6 11 2
14 38 16 5 7 3 1 6
15 29 10 2 14 3
16 36 16 7 9 4
17 44 23 2 19
TOTAL 282 152 75 57 28 93
Percent of Total
6
School Project Teams are encouraged to conduct interviews or focus group discussions with parents/guardians/community members to probe
deeper on reasons cited

1.3 Number of children in the barangay NOT in school the last two SYs, depending on data availability
No. of Out-of-school Children
SY Before Previous SY _2016-2017 Previous SY __2017-2018 Attending Other Forms of Learning in
Age Previous SY
 Age ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
4 299 126 173 269 126 143
5 59 31 28 89 51 38
6 36 24 12 71 29 42
7 20 7 13 26 11 15
8 11 6 5 23 14 9
9 5 3 2 16 9 7
10 4 4 0 14 9 5
11 13 5 8 16 8 8
12 12 2 10 18 11 7
13 25 12 13 21 10 11
14 30 13 17 26 15 11
15 33 18 15 28 12 16
16 35 19 16 43 25 18
17 37 19 18 51 24 27
TOTAL 619 289 330 711 354 357

1.4 Projects/interventions implemented to ensure that out-of-school children are reached or mainstreamed in school

YES NO If YES, please describe the mechanism/

intervention used by the school-community

a. Does the school-community have a mechanism to actively seek Aside from the Barangay Workers, GBES teachers
out children not in school and give them access to education (e.g., /
family mapping, Community-Based Management System, etc)? conduct house-to-house visitation

b. Did the school use interventions in the previous SYs to

/ ALS
ensure that out-of-school children have access to education?

2. CHILDREN ENROLLED IN SCHOOL [SRC.1.]

2.1 Enrollment for the last 3 SYs
SY Before Previous SY: 2016-2017 Previous SY: 2017-2018 Current SY: 2018-2019
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten 322 187 135 530 291 239 492 246 246
Grade 1 485 277 208 381 223 158 560 311 249
Grade 2 507 284 223 438 240 198 426 251 175
Grade 3 535 279 256 510 280 230 460 259 201
Grade 4 427 228 199 546 292 254 534 297 237
Grade 5 460 233 227 444 235 209 575 300 275
Grade 6 487 276 211 475 240 235 458 241 217
TOTAL 3223 1764 1,459 3324 1801 1523 3505 1905 1600
Percent of Total 54.73% 45.27% 54.18% 45.82% 54.35% 45.65%

2.2 Number of children with disabilities by type of disability (insert new columns if necessary)
No. of Type of Disability (Current SY)
Level Children
with Tinea Flava Scabies
Other Skin Pediculosis
Pale Error of
Squinting
Style/
Disabilities Disease Conjunctiva Refraction Hordeolum

Kindergarten 0
Grade 1 538 4 5 3 68 43 2 3 4
Grade 2 393 8 4 43 25 5 4
Grade 3 306 14 2 1 46 21 4 2
Grade 4 503 12 1 4 43 51 21 1 3
Grade 5 0
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template
TOTAL 1740 38 8 12 200 140 28 8 13
Percent of Total 2.18% 0.46% 0.69% 11.49% 8.05% 1.61% 0.46% 0.75%

Type of Disability (Current SY)

Distended
Cervical E.G Dental Carries Colds Cough Abdominal Dirty Teeth Dirty Hands Dirty Ears Clef Lip Boil
Parasitism

18 93 64 36 8 96 65 26 1 2
5 89 46 18 6 78 36 26 0 0
2 85 48 12 3 27 23 16 0 0
15 89 61 32 71 60 39 1 0

40 356 219 98 17 272 184 107 2 2

2.30% 20.46% 12.59% 5.63% 0.98% 15.63% 10.57% 6.15% 0.11% 0.11%

2.3 Other data

Level No. of Over-aged Learners No. of IP Learners No. of Muslim Learners No. of 4Ps
Learner-recipients
Kindergarten
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
TOTAL
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template

III. SITUATION OF CHILDREN / LEARNERS: ACCESS - ATTENDANCE AND RETENTION

Instruction: Please input required data/information in unshaded cells. Fill-in only the grade levels that are applicable to your school.

3. ATTENDANCE
3.1 Number of children regularly attending classes (at least 90% attendance) for the last three SYs 7
SY Before Previous SY: 2016-2017 Previous SY: 2017-2018 Current SY: 2018-2019
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten 240 130 110 504 284 220 471 235 236
Grade 1 412 225 187 355 210 145 535 297 238
Grade 2 444 250 194 418 230 188 392 232 160
Grade 3 486 246 240 477 266 211 433 248 185
Grade 4 387 200 187 523 287 236 508 281 227
Grade 5 385 195 190 417 229 188 553 288 265
Grade 6 443 245 198 443 230 213 416 229 187
TOTAL 2797 1491 1306 3137 1736 1401 3308 1810 1498

Percent of Total 53.31% 46.69% 55.34% 44.66% 54.72% 45.28%

3.2 Percentage of children regularly attending classes (at least 90% attendance) for the last three SYs 7
SY Before Previous SY: 2016-2017 Previous SY: 2017-2018 Current SY: 2018-2019
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten 74.53% 69.52% 81.48% 95.09% 97.59% 92.05% 95.73% 95.53% 95.93%
Grade 1 84.95% 81.23% 89.90% 93.18% 94.17% 91.77% 95.54% 95.50% 95.58%
Grade 2 87.57% 88.03% 87.00% 95.43% 95.83% 94.95% 92.02% 92.43% 91.43%
Grade 3 90.84% 88.17% 93.75% 93.53% 95.00% 91.74% 94.13% 95.75% 92.04%
Grade 4 90.63% 87.72% 93.97% 95.79% 98.29% 92.91% 95.13% 94.61% 95.78%
Grade 5 83.70% 83.69% 83.70% 93.92% 97.45% 89.95% 96.17% 96.00% 96.36%
Grade 6 90.97% 88.77% 93.84% 93.26% 95.83% 90.64% 90.83% 95.02% 86.18%
OVERALL 86.78% 84.52% 89.51% 94.37% 96.39% 91.99% 94.38% 95.01% 93.63%
7
no. of children regularly attending classes divided by the total enrollment x 100

3.3 In the previous SY, how many children were frequently absent (below 90% attendance) and how many of them were recipients of the Conditional Cash Transfer Program
(Pantawid Pamilya) of DSWD?

Number of frequently absent students that were recipients of Pantawid

Total Enrollment Number of children who were frequently absent
Level Pamilya
in Previous SY
Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten 530 26 17 9 1 0 1
Grade 1 381 33 19 14 4 1 3
Grade 2 438 20 9 11 5 3 2
Grade 3 510 33 20 13 1 1 0
Grade 4 546 23 12 11 2 2 0
Grade 5 444 27 12 15 0 0 0
Grade 6 475 32 15 17 1 0 1
TOTAL 3324 194 104 90 14 7 7
Percent of Total 5.84% 53.61% 46.39% 0.42% 50.00% 50.00%

3.4 What were the reasons why children were frequently absent in the previous SY? Please indicate number of children who are frequently absent according to reasons.
Number of children who are frequently absent according to reasons 8 (Previous SY)
Total No. of
Children who
Level were Frequently Distance of
Financial Health and Affected by Affected by
Absent in Child Labor School from Other Reasons
Matters Nutrition Disaster Conflict
Previous SY Home

Kindergarten 26 12 3 0 3 0 0 4
Grade 1 33 16 4 0 4 0 0 9
Grade 2 20 9 0 0 6 0 0 5
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template
Grade 3 33 15 11 0 1 0 0 6
Grade 4 23 10 2 1 4 0 0 6
Grade 5 27 11 2 5 8 0 0 1
Grade 6 32 14 4 4 5 0 0 5

TOTAL 194 87 26 10 31 0 0 36

8
School Project Teams are encouraged to conduct interviews or focus group discussions with parents/guardians/community members to probe deeper on reasons cited
3.5 Projects/interventions implemented to address needs of children who are frequently absent (insert new rows if necessary) Number of Children Covered
Home visitation was conducted by the advisers. 175
Reward system was introduced to motivate SARDO's to return to school.

4. DROPOUT [SRC.7.]
4.1 Number of dropouts for the last three SYs
SY Before Previous SY: 2016-2017 Previous SY: 2017-2018 Current SY: 2018-2019
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten 21 18 3 12 8 4 15 10 5
Grade 1 5 3 2 14 7 7 5 5 0
Grade 2 2 0 2 11 9 2 9 8 1
Grade 3 5 3 2 15 14 1 5 1 4
Grade 4 9 7 2 3 2 1 7 4 3
Grade 5 2 0 2 9 7 2 12 9 3
Grade 6 2 0 2 1 0 1 5 4 1
TOTAL 46 31 15 65 47 18 58 41 17

4.2 Dropout rates for the last three SYs

SY Before Previous SY: 2016-2017 Previous SY: 2017-2018 Current SY: 2018-2019
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten 6.52% 9.63% 2.22% 2.26% 2.75% 1.67% 3.05% 4.07% 2.03%
Grade 1 1.03% 1.08% 0.96% 3.67% 3.14% 4.43% 0.89% 1.61% 0.00%
Grade 2 0.39% 0.00% 0.90% 2.51% 3.75% 1.01% 2.11% 3.19% 0.57%
Grade 3 0.93% 1.08% 0.78% 2.94% 5.00% 0.43% 1.09% 0.39% 1.99%
Grade 4 2.11% 3.07% 1.01% 0.55% 0.68% 0.39% 1.31% 1.35% 1.27%
Grade 5 0.43% 0.00% 0.88% 2.03% 2.98% 0.96% 2.09% 3.00% 1.09%
Grade 6 0.41% 0.00% 0.95% 0.21% 0.00% 0.43% 1.09% 1.66% 0.46%
OVERALL 1.43% 1.76% 1.03% 1.96% 2.61% 1.18% 1.65% 2.15% 1.06%

4.3 Number of dropouts by cause (insert new columns if necessary)

Number of Dropouts by Cause (Current SY)
Total No. of
Level Dropouts (Current
Health and Distance fof school
SY) Fianancial Matters Nutrition Child Labor from Home Affected by Disaster Affected by Conflict Lack of Interest Others

Kindergarten 15 4 3 0 3 0 0 3 2
Grade 1 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 2
Grade 2 9 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 3
Grade 3 5 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Grade 4 7 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Grade 5 12 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 1
Grade 6 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
TOTAL 58 20 4 2 10 0 0 7 10
Percent of Total 34.48% 6.90% 3.45% 17.24% 0.00% 0.00% 12.07% 17.24%

4.4 Projects/interventions implemented for children at risk of dropping out

4.4.a Does the school have mechanisms to: YES NO If YES, please describe the mechanisms used by the school

- track attendance and identify children at risk of dropping out and / use of SF2 to track the daily attendance
failing and design remedies to keep them in school?
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template

- anticipate and minimize disruptions of classes especially with respect / SDRRM conducts drill and announces classes suspension
to emergencies (disaster and conflict)?

- track teachers' attendance and ways of ensuring their regular presence / The School OIC conducts daily monitoring of attendance
based on CSC policy?

4.4.b What are the interventions implemented for children at risk of dropping out? Insert new rows if necessary. Number of Children Covered

The advisers sends call slips to meet with the parents of the SARDO's and discuss the issues. 32
For parents who cannot come to school, the advisers conduct home visitation to identify the problems of the
children-at-risk and discuss the issues with them to develop an intervention system for each pupil.
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template

IV. SITUATION OF CHILDREN / LEARNERS: QUALITY

Instruction: Please input required data/information in unshaded cells. Fill-in only the grade levels that are applicable to your school.

5. PROMOTION/GRADUATION RATES [SRC.8.]

5.1 Number of promoted learners/graduates by grade level, for the last three SYs
SY Before Previous SY: 16-17 Previous SY: 17-18 Current SY: 18-19
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Grade 1 410 222 188 377 221 156
Grade 2 503 282 221 430 235 195
Grade 3 532 279 253 492 268 224 486 198 288
Grade 4 417 224 193 548 290 258
Grade 5 467 240 227 441 226 215
Grade 6 485 276 209 477 238 239 452 236 216

TOTAL 2814 1523 1291 2765 1478 1287 938 434 504

5.2 Promotion/graduation rates for the last three SYs 9

SY Before Previous SY: 16-17 Previous SY: 17-18 Current SY: 18-19
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Grade 1 84.54% 80.14% 90.38% 98.95% 99.10% 98.73%
Grade 2 99.21% 99.30% 99.10% 98.17% 97.92% 98.48%
Grade 3 99.44% 100.00% 98.83% 96.47% 95.71% 97.39% 105.65% 76.45% 143.28%
Grade 4 97.66% 98.25% 96.98% 100.37% 99.32% 101.57%
Grade 5 101.52% 103.00% 100.00% 99.32% 96.17% 102.87%
Grade 6 99.59% 100.00% 99.05% 100.42% 99.17% 101.70% 98.69% 97.93% 99.54%

OVERALL 97.00% 96.58% 97.51% 98.96% 97.88% 100.23% 31.13% 26.16% 37.22%

9
Promotion rate: no. of promoted learners divided by the total enrollment x 100;
Graduation rate: no. of graduates divided by the total enrollment x 100

6. MEAN PERCENTAGE SCORES (based on National Achievement Tests for Grades 3 and 6) [SRC.9.]
6.1 Mean Percentage Scores of NAT Grade 3 and 6 (or Grade 8 and Grade 10 for the Secondary Level), per subject for the last three SYs
SY Before Previous SY: 12-13
Level
English Filipino Math Science HEKASI
Grade 3/8
Grade 6/10 41.37 61.26 32.36 35.67 48.1
Previous SY: 13-14
Level
English Filipino Math Science HEKASI
Grade 3/8
Grade 6/10 43.59 66.92 40.2 40.12 46.24
Current SY: 14-15
Level
English Filipino Math Science HEKASI
Grade 3/8
Grade 6/10 41.8 57.2 29.95 37.51 45.5

6.2 Projects/interventions implemented to improve basic competencies of learners (insert new rows if necessary)
The master teachers mentored teachers who conducted remedial sessions/reinforcement for grade six pupils in the fields
of Science and Math

7. LITERACY LEVEL [SRC.10.]

7.1 Number of learners who are in the frustration, instructional, and independent levels for the current SY (ENGLISH) 10
Frustration Level Instructional Level Independent Level
Level Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Pre-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
 ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template
Level Post-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
10
Based on Phil-IRI pre-test results

7.2 Number of learners who are in the frustration, instructional, and independent levels for the current SY (FILIPINO) 10
Frustration Level Instructional Level Independent Level
Level Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Pre-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Level Post-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6

7.3 Projects/interventions implemented to improve reading skills of children (insert new rows if necessary)
The school launched two CI projects that focused on reading interventions for the non readers and frustration readers in
both English and Filipino namely Project Star and Project Yaman for grades three and two respectively.

8. AWARDS/RECOGNITIONS (TOP 3) [SRC.6.]

List down the awards/recognitions received by the school, the school head, teachers, and students. Insert new rows if necessary.
Category of Award-giving Body (Please identify)
Title Year
Awardees District Division Regional National International
Student 2018 District Schools Press in English
and Filipino 2018 /
Feature Writing Category 2018 /
Copy Reading and Headline News
Writing 2018 /
Editorial Writing 2018 /
2018 Division Press Conference in
Schools and Filipino 2018 /

2018 Municipal AP Festival of

2018
Talents, Quiz Bee, Poster Making
2018 Division Araling Panlipunan
Festival of Talents: Quiz Bee 2018 /
Teacher
2018 Division Search for Brigada Eskwela Best
Implementers Bnrigada Coordinator 2018 /
School Head 2018 Division Search for Brigada Eskwela Best
Implementers 2018 /
School 2018 District Search for Brigada Eskwela
Best Implementer 2018 /
1st Place Drum and Lyre Parade Competition
2018 2018 /
Municipal Kakanin Festival

1st Place 2018 Division Search for Brigada

Eskwela Best Implementers for Mega 2018 /
SchoolCategory

SM UNITED NATION Celebration Champion

2018 /
Most Number of Participants