Sei sulla pagina 1di 222

EVALUATION OF THE

ELEVATED TEMPERATURE TENSILE


AND CREEP-RUPTURE PROPERTIES OF
3TO 9 PERCENT CHROMIUM-MOLYBDENUM
STEELS
Prepared for the
METAL PROPERTIES COUNCIL
by G. V. Smith

DS58

~~l~ AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS


EVALUATION OF THE ELEVATED
TEMPERATURE TENSILE AND
CREEP-RUPTURE PROPERTIES
OF 3 TO 9 PERCENT
CHROMIUM-MOLYBDENUM STEELS

Prepared for the


METAL PROPERTIES COUNCIL
by G. V. Smith

ASTM DATA SERIES PUBLICATION DS 58

List price $14.75


05-058000-40

d01~ AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS


'lij IJ 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103
© by American Society for Testing and Materials
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 75-18417

NOTE

The Society is not responsible, as a body,


for the statements and opinions
advanced in this publication.

Printed in Gibbsboro, NJ.


October 1975
Foreword

This book represents a part of a continuing effort by The Metal Properties Council on
behalf of the engineering community. Individuals and organizations generating additional
information concerning the materials evaluated in this report, or in others in this series,
are urged to make these data available to the Council for incorporation in future
revisions. Address the Council at: The United Engineering Center, 345 East 47th St., New
York, N.Y. 10017.
Related
ASTM Publications
Supplemental Report on the Elevated-Temperature Properties of Chromium-
Molybdenum Steels, DS 6-S2 ( 1971 ), $7 .00, 05-00600240

Evaluation of the Elevated Temperature Tensile and Creep-Rupture Properties


of C-Mo, Mn-Mo, and Mn-Mo-Ni Steels, DS 47 (1971), $6.25
05-04700-02
A Note of Appreciation
to Reviewers

This publication is made possible by the authors and, also, the unheralded efforts of
the reviewers. This body of technical experts whose dedication, sacrifice of time and
effort, and collective wisdom in reviewing the papers must be acknowledged. The quality
level of ASTM publications is a direct function of their respected opinions. On behalf of
ASTM we acknowledge with appreciation their contribution.

ASTM Committee on Publications


Editorial Staff
Jane B. Wheeler, Managing Editor
Helen M. Hoersch, Associate Editor
Charlotte E. Wilson, Senior Assistant Editor
Ellen J. McGlinchey, Assistant Editor
Contents

Abstract
Figures 1 thru 6 2
Introduction 8
Yield Strength, Tensile Strength, and Ductility 8
Part 1 3Cr-1Mo 8
Part 2 5Cr-1hMo 9
Part 3 5Cr-1hMo-Si 9
Part 4 5Cr-1hMo-Ti 9
Part 5 7Cr-1hMo 9
Part 6 9Cr-1Mo 9
Creep and Rupture Properties 9
Part 1 3Cr-1Mo 10
Part 2 5Cr-1hMo 11
Part 3 5Cr-1hMo-Si 12
Part 4 5Cr-1hMo-Ti 12
Part 5 7Cr-1hMo 13
Part 6 9Cr-1Mo 13
Choice Between Evaluation Procedures 14
Comparison of Grades 14
Acknowledgments 14
References 15
Tables 16
Figures 7 thru 60 81
Appendix: Specifications Encompassed in Report 207
DS58-EB/Oct. 1975
REFERENCE: Smith, G. V., Evaluation of the The rupture and secondary creep rate data
Elevated Temperature Tensile and Creep Rupture have been evaluated by both direct isothermal inter-
Properties of 3-9 percent Chromium-Molybdenum polation or extrapolation, and by time-temperature
Steels; ASTM Data Series, American Society for parameter, to establish the temperature dependence
Testing and Materials, 1975. of the average and minimum stresses to cause a
secondary creep rate of 0.1 and 0.01 percent per
ABSTRACT: The evaluations of this report cover 6 1000 hours, and of the average and minimum stresses
grades of chromium-molybdenum ste.el of interest to produce rupture in 1000, 10,000 and 100,000
for applications in boilers and pressure vessels: hours.
Elongation and reduction of area data at frac-
3 Cr - 1 Mo 5 Cr - ~ Mo-Ti ture are included for both the short time elevated
temperature tensile tests and for the rupture tests.
5 Cr - ~Mo Summary figures, Figs. 1-6, immediately fol-
lowing this abstract show the temperature depen-
5 Cr - ~ Mo-Si 9 Cr - 1 Mo dence of strength properties for the 6 grades of
steel evaluated in this report. In these illus-
The data that are evaluated include both previ- trations, the yield and tensile strength trend
ously published data and hitherto unpublished data curves have been adjusted so that they corres-
gathered by The Metal Properties Council from con- pond at room temperature to the specified minimum
tributing laboratories. The properties that have values of common ASTM product specifications.
been evaluated include yield strength, tensile The creep and rupture strengths represent the
strength, creep strength and rupture strength. average values for a secondary creep rate of 0.01
In evaluating the yield and tensile strength percent per 1000 hours and rupture in 100,000
data, a normalizing procedure has been employed hours, respectively.
that involves ratioing the elevated temperature Tabular comparisons of the yield strength
strength of a particular lot to the room temper- ratio and tensile strength ratio trend curves for
ature strength of that same lot. The method of the six grades of steel are provided in Table V,
least squares is then employed to define a trend and graphical comparisons are offered in Figs. 57-
curve for the ratio values representing a par- 58.
ticular material grade. Tabular comparisons of the creep and rupture
strengths are provided in Tables VIII through XI,
with graphical comparisons of average 100,000-
hour rupture strengths and average 0.01 percent
per 1000 hour creep strengths in Figs. 59 and 60.

KEY WORDS: elevated temperature, mechanical pro-


perties, tensile strength, yield strength, creep
strength, rupture strength, elongation, reduction
of area, chromium-molybdenum steels, time-temper-
ature parameters, data evaluation.

Copyright © 1975 by ASTM International www.astm.org


~, 1

r,

,.
·+-I-+- • t--t-

~- +

++
~-,

-f'I :

Fig. 1. Effect of temperature on yield strength, tensile strength,


rupture strength (100,000 hours), and creep strength (0.01~ per
1000 hours) of J Cr - 1 Mo steel. Yield strength and tensile
strength have been adjusted to 45 and 75 ksi at 75 F. Rupture and
creep strengths are averages Of available data other than quenched
and tempered.

2
Pig. 2. Effect of temperature on yield strength, tensile strength,
rupture strength (100,000 hours), and creep strength (0.01~ per
1000 hours) of 5Cr-iMo steel. Yield and tensile strengths have
been adjusted to JO and 60 ksi at 75 P. Rupture and creep strengths
are averages of available data.

3
Pig. J. Effect of temperature on yield strength, tensile strength,
rupture streng!;h (100,000 hours), creep strength (0.01~ per 1000
hours) of 5Cr-itlo-Si steel. Yield and tensile strengths have been
adjusted to JO and 60 ksi at room temperature. Rupture and creep
strengths are aveeages of available data.

4
+ t

Figure 4. Effect of temperature on yield strength, tensile strength,


rupture strength (100,000 hours), and creep strength (0.01% per
1000 hours) of 5Cr-iMo-Ti steel. Yield and tensile strengths have
been adjusted to JO and 60 ksi at 75 P. Rupture and creep strengths
are averages of available data.

5
i
I

_:..:: :_.: . ..:::=-- ;tt


.:--.::
~--
·+-: _:..:__:_:_ --= ;--+--+- tH

+.· ·•

.~. :.~;: . r~ + '

I- .
~:~_.,:;.;c~'~ -

--~-~ rt-

• ;.. •. , -r+-
~
., '
-:;:+

,+

-h

Fig. 5. Effect of temperature on yield strength, tensile strength,


rupture strength (100,000 hours}, and creep strength (0.01~ per
1000 hours) of ?Cr-iMo steel. Yield and tensile strengths have
been adjqsted to JO and 60 ksi at 75 F. Rupture and creep strengths
are averages of available data.

6
..

Fig. 6. Effect of temperature on yield strength, tensile st:N:Jngth,


rupture strength (100,000 hours), and creep strength (0.01~ per
1000 hours) of 9Cr-1Mo steel. Yield and tensile strengths have
been adjusted to JO and 60 ksi at 75 F. Rupture and creep strengths
are averages of available data.

7
INTRODUCTION

The evaluations presented herein represent another average of duplicate tests. The yield strength
in a series of reports prepared under the sponsor- values represent either 0.2% offset, or the lower
ship of The Metal Properties Council (MPC) in the yield point, which is considered its equivalent.
interests of providing engineering design infor- Elongation at fracture was measured over a 2-inch
mation. Included in the present evaluations are gage length, unless otherwise noted. Plate
6 grades of chromium-molybdenum steel ranging from samples were taken at the quarter thickness position
3 percent to 9 percent chromium, and ~ to 1 per- parallel to the rolling direction, unless other-
cent molybdenum. All are recognized for boiler wise indicated.
and pressure vessel usage. The yield and tensile strength evaluations
The tabular data, charts and the results of were made employing a normalizing procedure which
the evaluations for the six grades have been has proved useful in prior evaluations (e.g., ref-
grouped separately as follows: erences 13-14). This procedure involves ratioing
the elevated temperature yield and tensile
Part 1: 3 Cr - 1 Mo steels strengths of individual heats of a particular grade
of material to the room temperature yield and
Part 2: 5 Cr - ~ Mo steels tensile strengths of the same lots. Then, by the
method of least squares, the best fit curve is
Part 3:· 5 Cr - ~ Mo-Si steels established for each set of such ratios to provide
trend curves in ratio form, defining the variation
Part 4: 5 Cr - ~ Mo-Ti steels of strength with temperature. These character-
istic strength ratio trend curves may then be em-
Part 5: 7 Cr - ~ Mo steels ployed to compute strength-temperature trend
curves for specific room temperature strength
Part 6: 9 Cr - 1 Mo steels levels of interest within the limits represented
by the original data. Of frequent interest are
The data that are evaluated include both data curves anchored to the minimum strength specified
previously published in ASTM's OS Data Series Pub- in the purchase specification (sometimes identi-
lications, Cl,2J and hitherto unpublished data fied as minimum position curves). Experience has
gathered by MPC from cooperating industrial organ- indicated that such a curve may be expected to de-
izations. Data representing different product fine, approximately, a lower boundary for 95 per-
forms, plate, bar, pipe, tube, forging and casting cent of the data when the room temperature data
are included; however, for some grades, the number population spans uniformly the permitted (or ex-
of data representing certain product forms was pected) range of strengths.
limited or completely lacking. Data for weld metal The yield strength, tensile strength and
have been included, but are very limited in number; ductility data for the different grades are plotted
data for weldments have not been included, owing as dependent upon temperature in Figs. 7-12.
to the dependence of their behavior upon unstand-
ardized specific test details, e.g., the relative Part 1: 3 Cr - 1 Mo steels; Figs. 7a, b, c
fractions of base metal, weld metal and heat-
affected-zone encompassed. The yield strength and strength ratio results are
All of the data, including those from refer- plotted in Fig. 7a, the tensile strength and
ences 1 and 2, are identified in Tables 1 and 2 as strength ratio results in Fig. 7b, and the elonga-
to specification number, deoxidation practice, tion and reduction of area results in Fig. 7c.
heat treatment, product form and size, grain size The trend curves for yield and tensile strength
and chemical composition, in so far as these are ratios, developed by the least squares procedure,
known. are shown in the figures and tabulated in Table V.
The properties that have been evaluated in- The quantity of data for this steel at temperatures
clude yield strength, tensile strength, creep between room temperature and 800 F is minimal,
strength and rupture strength. Creep strength has and consequently there exists an uncertainty in
been evaluated at two levels, as the stress caus- the trend curves for this range. Furthermore,
ing a secondary creep rate of 0.1% or 0.01% per some of the yield strength data represent 0.1 per-
1000 hours; rupture strength has been evaluated at cent offset; the ratioed values for these data
1000, 10,000 and 100,000 hours. Since the indi- were nevertheless included in the least squares
vidual strength properties employed in setting al- evaluation, on the assumption that the ratios for
lowable design stress intensities are each-re- 0.1% offset might be expected to approximate those
quired in the temperature range for which they may for 0.2% offset.
govern, the evaluations have been directed towards Most of the data represented plate, in either
developing trend curves that define the variation the normalized and tempered or quenched and temp-
of strength with temperature. ered conditions. There were too few data repre-
Elongation and reduction of area at fracture senting other product forms and heat treatments to
in the tensile and rupture tests are included in warrant endeavoring to distinguish possible effects
the report, where available, and plotted in sum- of these variables, and therefore all of the data
mary figures to reveal trends of behavior. (except those for weld metal) and encompassing
very broad ranges of strength at room temperature,
YIELD STRENGTII, TENSILE STRENGTH. ELONGATION AND were treated as being from the same population.
REDUCTION OF AREA However, this assumption may be unwarranted. The
prior evaluation of the 2~ Cr - 1 Mo steels, with
The original tensile test results, which are pre- which the 3 Cr - 1 Mo grade has generally been
sumed to have been generated at strain rates gen- grouped for ASME Code purposes, revealed a signi-
erally within the limits established in ASTM ficant effect of heat treatment. In spite of the
RecoDD11ended Practice E21, are tabulated in Table data deficiencies for 3 Cr - 1 Mo steel, it is of
III. Many of the reported results represent the interest that the trend curves shown in Figs. 7a

8
and b, and tabulated in Table V, do approximate an the temperature range for which data are lacking
average of the individual curves for 2~ Cr - 1 Mo have been sketched in, guided by the results of
steel. the least squares analyses for the higher temper-
Although excluded from the least squares ature range. Consequently, the trend curves can
analysis (on general grounds), the limited yield only be viewed as very rough approximations be-
and tensile strength data for weld metal fall with- tween room temperature and 700 F. Even at higher
in the scatter bands for the several wrought pro- temperatures, the trend curves must be viewed as
duct forms. approximate, since they are based upon few test
The elongation and reduction of area data are results. Comparison with 5 Cr - '2 Mo steel, Table
plotted in Fig. 7c. Owing to the paucity of data V, reveals that although the derived trend curves
between room temperature and 800 F, the trend of differ importantly, the strength ratio scatter
ductility is poorly defined; above 800 F, ductility bands overlap sufficiently that it is possible
increases with increasing temperature. In asses- that the data for the 5 Cr - '2 Mo-Ti steel could
sing the ductility data, note should be taken that be viewed as belonging to the same population as
the strength at room temperature spans from 70 to that for 5 Cr - ~ Mo.
more than 130 ksi. The one set of weld-metal re- The gap in data between room temperature and
duction of area values falling below the general 700 F al so exists for elongation and reduction of
scatter band, had a tensile strength at room tem- area. Within this limitation, the data exhibit
perature of 127 ksi. Also, a gage length of 1 trends with increasing temperature similar to
inch had been employed for the plate material. those for 5 Cr - '2 Mo.
Part 2: 5 Cr - '2Mo steels; Figs. Sa, b, c Part 5: 7 Cr - '2 Mo steel; Figs. lla, b, c
The yield strength and strength ratio results are Elevated temperature tensile strength results were
shown in Fig. Sa, the tensile strength ratio re- available for only three heats of 7 Cr - '2 Mo
sults in Fig. Sb, and the ductility data in Fig. steel; yield strength results were available for
Be. Trend curves are superimposed upon the only one heat, with a gap between room temperature
strength ratio data in Figs. 8a and Sb, and tab- and 1000 F. The derived trend curves, particularly
ulated in Table V. Weld metal data were again ex- that for yield strength below 1000 F must be view-
cluded from the least squares analysis, although ed as very approximate. When compared with the
the ratio values fall not unreasonably in relation 9 Cr - 1 Mo steel, to be considered next, and for
to the scatter bands for the various product forms; which a somewhat greater number of data were avail-
the latter were treated as though belonging to a able, the differences are not large. The data
single population. Although a wide range of points for weld metal fell within the scatter
strengths is represented in the room temperature bands for the wrought data, all of which repre-
data, inspection of the ratio scatter bands does sented bar.
not suggest any significant effect of strength Elongation and reduction of area values were
level upon the trend curves. available at elevated temperatures for only one
Fig. Sc suggests some slight fall off of heat of wrought material, with no values between
elongation but not of reduction of area at inter- room temperature and 1000 F.
mediate temperatures, before the usually observed
increase at higher temperatures. Part 6: 9 Cr - 1 Mo steel; Figs. 12a, b, c

Part 3: 5 Cr- '2Mo-Si steels; Figs. 9a, b, c The yield and tensile strength ratio trend curves
for 9 Cr - 1 Mo steel appear fairly well defined,
Tensile test results were avilable for 4 heats of although there is not an abundance of data. For
bar and 1 of cast material; inspection of the this material, some of the weld metal strength
strength ratio scatter bands suggested that the ratios fall significantly above the scatter bands
data should be treated as from a common population, representing bar and tube stock.
and this was assumed. It is, of course, possible The ductility data exhibit the same general
that further data would prove the assumption to be trend with increasing temperature as did the other
unwarranted. It is of interest to note that the steels of the present evaluation. The low
tensile strength ratio curve for 5 Cr- '2 Mo-Si ductility values for weld metal represent one lot
steel is substantially identical with that for whose tensile strength at room temperature was
5 Cr - '2 Mo up to 900 F, beyond which the former very high, 130 ksi, tested in the as-welded con-
falls somewhat more rapidly with increasing temp- dition; commonly, a post weld heat treatment would
erature. The yield strength ratio curves cross be imposed.
one another at 550 F, and differ by less than 10
percent at temperatures up to 1000 F. However, CREEP A.\ll RIJPTll!CL PROPERTIES
with so few data for the 5 Cr - '2 Mo-Si steel, it
seems doubtful that the differences are signi- The available creep and rupture test results are
ficant. tabulated in Table IV, separated into 6 parts ac-
In so far as can be judged, the limited cording to nominal grade composition.
ductility data exhibit the same general trend with The rupture data were evaluated to provide
increasing temperature as did the 3 Cr - 1 Mo and rupture strengths corresponding to 1000, 10,000
5 Cr -'2 Mo steels -- essentially flat to about and 100,000 hours; the creep rate data were eval-
800 F, and then increasing. uated to develop creep strengths corresponding to
secondary creep rates of 0.1 and 0.01 percent per
Part 4: 5 Cr - '2 Mo-Ti steel; Figs. lOa, b, c 1000 hours.
The evaluations have been performed by both
For this material, there were no tensile test direct and indirect procedures. The direct pro-
data between room temperature and 700 F, and data cedure involves interpolating or extrapolating
for only 4 heats at 700 F and higher. All of the the isothermal relation between stress and rupture
data were for bar. The ratio trend curves over time, or between stress and secondary creep rate,

9
plotted in either instance, on double logarithmic kept in mind in assessing the degree of scatter of
coordinates. The indirect evaluations employed the the data in Figs. 13-15.
Larson-Miller time-temperature parameter. The
direct evaluations were performed on individual Rupture Strength
lots. The indirect or parameter evaluations were
carried out only on a "universalized" basis assum- The results of the individual lot interpolations
ing a universal value for the parameter constant, or extrapolations are plotted in Figs. 17a-c as
even though it is recognized that the constant may dependent upon temperature and tabulated in Table
vary from lot to lot. As noted in earlier reports VI. The universalized Larson-Miller parameter
in this series, the available data are of such a scatter band (c = 20), representing all test times
character as to preclude individual lot parameter greater than 5 hours, is shown in Fig. 16. In both
evaluations (as would be preferable) on other than Figs. 16 and 17, a distinction is made as to heat
a fraction of the available data. treatment, and thus, indirectly, as to strength at
When the direct evaluations required extra- room temperature. Inspection of the plots re-
polation, this was performed visually, with greater veals that the data representing quenched and tem-
weight given to the longer time or slower-rate pered plate material having a tensile strength at
data. Rupture extrapolations were made only when room temperature exceeding 110 ksi fall in a dis-
it seemed reasonable to assume linearity for the tinctly different region of the plot than do the
longer time data. However, it is recognized that, data for annealed or normalized and tempered
especially at the higher temperatures, a trend to material, for which the tensile strength at room
bilinearity or curvilinearity, downward in either temperature is less than 100 ksi. The data for a
instance, may develop and, if not recognized, lead single lot of quenched and tempered material having
to a non-conservative extrapolation. The log a tensile strength of 91 ksi also fall within this
stress-log secondary creep rate plots frequently second region.
exhibited curvilinearity at slower rates approach- To explore further the relationship between
ing 0.01 percent per 1000 hours, and where extra- rupture strength and room temperature tensile
p0lations were required, these were restricted strength, the results of the individual-lot deter-
generally to not more than one log cycle, and per- minations of 10,000 hour rupture strength (Table
formed with a conservative assessment of the VI) have been plotted (open symbols) in Fig. 18 as
scatter and the curvilinearity. dependent upon tensile strength. Also shown are
The well-known Larson-Miller parameter was em- the few data for rupture in 100,000 hours (filled
ployed in evaluating the rupture data, using, for synbols}. The 10,000 hour data have been assessed
all grades excepting 9 Cr - 1 Mo, the generally by the method of least squares; and the resulting
assumed value of 20 for the constant c: trend lines are shown in Fig. 18. Estimated trend
curves have been drawn visually for the few 100,000
T(20 + log t) hour data, paralleling those for 10,000 hours.
Although the quantity of data are too few,
where T is the temperature in degrees Rankin, t even for rupture in 10,000 hours, to provide more
than an approximate assessment of the average de-
is the time in hours and F1 (s) signifies that the
parameter is a function of the applied stress s. pendence upon room temperature tensile strength, it
Leyda and Rowel6 had reported optimal values of c is clear that these properties are interrelated,
as was previously reported (13,15) for quenched
for individual lots of various grades of steel.
On the basis of these results, a value of c = 20 and tempered 2~ Cr - 1 Mo steel. Rupture strength
increases with increasing room temperature strength,
seems suitable for all except 9 Cr - 1 Mo. For the rate of increase decreasing with increasing
this grade a higher value was indicated, and this
has been confirmed in unpublished work at ORNL,17 temperature, and still faintly evident at 1100 F.
For quenched and tempered 2~ Cr - 1 Mo steel, the
from which the value of C = 25.1 used here was dependence had pretty well washed out by 1000 F.
taken.
The Larson-Miller parameter was also employed The effect of room temperature strength upon
the creep rupture properties has not heretofore
for evaluating the secondary creep rate data in been considered for purposes of establishing ASME
the form: Code allowable stresses, and in fact, the avail-
able data for 3 Cr-Mo steel are inadequate to do
T(20 - log r) so. Analyses have therefore been made of all data
representing other than quenched-and-tempered
where r is the secondary creep rate in percent material (the quenched and tempered condition
per hour. having not yet been recognized by the ASME Code
for service in the creep range), without regard to
Part 1: 3 Cr - 1 Mo steel; Figs. 13-21 room temperature strength, to provide a current
best assessment of creep and rupture strengths for
To show graphically the quantity of available data, purposes of setting allowable stresses, on an
as well as their scatter, all of the time to rup- interim basis. In one of these analyses, the uni-
ture data have been plotted in Figs. 13a-c; all of versalized Larson-Miller data for annealed and nor-
the secondary creep rate data have been plotted in malized and tempered wrought material have been
Figs. 14a-c; and all of the elGngation and reduc- eval11ated by the least squares method to define
tion of area data at rupture have been plotted in the mean curve of best fit; this is shown on Fig.
Figs. lSa-g. Data were available for bar, plate, 16. A minimum curve representing a lower bound
and pipe-tube product forms and for a few lots of for approximately 95 percent of the data is also
weld metal, and are differentiated in the plots. shown, derived as in previous evaluations by sub-
Various heat treatments, including quenching and stracting 1.65 multiples of the standard deviation
tempering, are represented, with a consequent wide from the mean curve. Average and minimum rupture
variation in room temperature strength. Evalua- strengths corresponding to 1000, 10,000 and
tion of the data shows that strength at room temp- 100,000 hours, derived from Fig. 16 are tabulated
erature can exert an important effect upon the in Tables VIII and IX. In a second type of
creep and rupture strengths, and this should be

10
analysis, the rupture strength evaluations of indi- Part 2: 5 Cr - ~Mo steels; Figs. 22-28
vidual lots (excluding quenched and tempered mater-
ial), plotted in Figs. 17a, b and c, have been All of the time for rupture data are plotted in
evaluated by the least squares method; the result- Figs. 22a-c; all of the secondary creep rate data
ing mean and minimum trend curves are shown in the have been plotted in Figs. 23a-c; and all of the
figures and tabulated in Tables VIII and IX. rupture ductility data have been plotted in Figs.
The average rupture strengths derived by the 24a-f.
parameter analysis are superimposed upon Figs. 17a-
c for comparison with the results by individual lot Rupture Strength
analysis. Inspection of the plots reveals gener-
ally good agreement, with the greatest differences The universalized Larson-Miller parameter scatter
not exceeding about 10%. The differences in min- band (c = 20), representing all rupture times ex-
inum rupture strength, Table IX, are of the same ceeding 5 hours, is plotted as Fig. 25; the results
order. of the individual lot interpolations or extra-
With the master parameter curve, it is also polations are tabulated in Table Vl and plotted in
possible to compute the isothermal log stress-log Figs. 26a-c. In either instance, the data for lot
rupture time curves to permit a visual test of how 2-9, having a tensile strength at room temperature
well the computed curves represent the test data. of 126 ksi is clearly separated from data for the
Such computed isothermal trend curves are super- remaining wrought materials; consequently, data
imposed upon the plots of Figs. 13a-c. However, for this lot have been excluded from the various
there are too few data to form a judgment. regression analyses related to Figs. 25 and 26.
The few data for cast material fell within the
Creep Strength scatter band for wrought material and were in-
cluded in the regression analyses.
The results of the individual lot interpolations or Examination of the wrought data, other than
extrapolations to define creep strengths corres- lot 2-9, reveals no effect of room temperature
ponding to secondary creep rates of 0.1 and 0.01% tensile strength upon elevated temperature rupture
per 100 hours are included in Table VII, and are strength (10,000 or 100,000 hours). However, there
plotted in Fig. 20. The universalized Larson- are too few test results at temperatures below
Miller secondary creep-rate parameter scatter band 1200 F to warrant drawing a general conclusion to
is shown in Fig.19. Again, it is clear that, as that effect. At 1200 F, no effect of room tempera-
with rupture strength, creep strength depends upon ture strength level is evident. Accordingly evalu-
tensile strength_ at room temperature. Accordingly, ations for rupture strength have been performed
a mean trend curve was developed for other-than- for all data other than lot 2-9 and weld metal on
quenched-and-tempered material; this is shown in the assumption of a common population.
Fig. 19, together with a minimum trend curve der- The temperature dependencies of the individual
ived, as previously, from the mean curve. lot interpolations or extrapolations have been
From the individually evaluated data of Fig. examined by the method of least squares, and the
20, mean trend curves were developed, as shown. resulting lines of best fit are superimposed upon
However, there were too few data to warrant devel- the plots of Figs. 26a-c. Rupture strengths cor-
oping minimum values, nor, in fact for placing much responding to 1000, 10,000 and 100,000 hours taken
confidence in the mean trend curves. Even so, the from these trend curves are included in Table VIII.
mean curves agreed reasonably well with trend Minimum rupture strengths derived, as previously
curves computed from the mean master parameter described, from the mean curves are also shown in
curve of Fig. 19 and also shown in Fig. 20. Be- the plots, and included in Table IX.
cause of the relatively few individual lot data, Superimposed upon the parameter scatter band
greater confidence should probably be placed in (Fig. 25) is the mean curve of best fit for the
the parameter result. The trend curves are pro- data as determined by the method of least squares.
vided in tabular form in Table X. Also shown is a minimum curve derived from the
From the mean master parameter curve (exclud- mean by substracting 1.65 multiples of the stand-
ing quenched and tempered material}, the isothermal ard deviation. From the mean curve, rupture
log stress versus log secondary creep curves have strengths corresponding to 1000, 10,000 and 100,000
been computed, and are superimposed upon the data hours have been computed, and the resulting trend
plots of Figs. 14a-c. The computed curves are in curves have been superimposed up~n the plots of
conformity with the data. Figs. 26a-c, and included in Table VllI. The
The individual lot estimates of creep. strength trend curves agree well with those derived from
(0.1 percent per 1000 hours) have been plotted the individual lot evaluations. Minimum rupture
versus tensile strength at room temperature in Fig. strength values have also been derived from the
21. The trends are similar to those evident in minimum curve of Fig. 25. These values are in-
Fig. 18 for rupture strength. There were too few cluded in the summary comparison of Table IX, and
data for creep strength (0.01 percent) to warrant on the whole, agree well with those developed by
plotting. individual lot analysis.
A final comparison may be made by computing
Rupture Ductility the isothermal log stress versus log time for
rupture curves from the mean curve of Fig. 25, and
Relatively few data were available for other than superimposing the results upon Figs. 22a-c. The
plate material and hence the trends of behavior computed curves agree satisfactorily with the
for other than quenched and tempered material can- wrought data (excluding lot 2-9, as discussed pre-
not be identified. The higher strength, quenched viously}.
and tempered plate material exhibited a trend to
reduced ductility at longer times, suggesting
possible notch rupture sensitivity. Creep Strength

The results of the individual lot interpolations

11
or extrapolations assessing average creep strengths by the two evaluation procedures. This is es-
corresponding to 0.1 and 0.01 percent per 1000 pecially noteworthy in view of the relatively
hours are included in Table VII and plotted in small number of available data.
Figs. 28a and b. Excluding the data for lot 2-9, The average parameter trend curve of Fig. 32
as discussed previously, the temperature variations has also provided a basis for computing the iso-
of creep strength were developed by the method of thermal log stress-log time for rupture curves
least squares and are shown in Figs. 28a and b and that are superimposed in Figs. 29a-c upon the
included in Table X (mean values). available data. Good agreement is evident.
The universalized Larson-Miller secondary
creep rate parameter scatter band is shown in Fig. Creep Strength
27, with superimposed average and minimum trend
curves. From the average curve, creep strengths The individual lot evaluations for creep strength
corresponding to secondary creep rates of 0.1 and (O.l and 0.01 percent per 1000 hours) are included
0.01 percent per 1000 hours have been computed and in Table VII and are plotted in Fig. 35. Average
these are superimposed on Figs. 28a and b, and in- trend curves developed by the method of least
cluded in Table X. Close agreement is evident be- squares are also shown in Fig. 35 and included in
tween the creep strengths developed by the indi- Table X.
vidual lot and parameter evaluation procedures, The universalized Larson-Miller secondary
particularly for 0.01 percent per 1000 hours. creep rate parameter scatter band for 5 Cr - Y, Mo-Si
From the average trend curve for the parameter steel is shown in Fig. 34. Mean and minimum trend
scatter band, isothermal log stress-log secondary curves, excluding data for castings, have been
creep curves have been computed, and these are superimposed upon the plot. Creep strengths cor-
shown superimposed on the isothermal scatter bands, responding to secondary creep rates of 0.1 and
Figs. 23a, b and c. Reasonably good agreement is 0.01 percent per 1000 hours have been computed
evident. also from the mean master parameter curve and
Minimum creep strengths have been computed these are plotted in Figs. 35a and b and included
for both the individual lot data and the parameter- in Table X. The creep strength vs temperature
ized data, by the method described previously, and trend curves by individual lot and by parameter
are included in Table XI. evaluations are in fair (0.1%) to good (0.01%)
agreement.
Rupture Ductility From the master parameter curve, isothermal
log stress vs secondary creep rate curves have
Except at 1200 F, there were relatively few data, been computed, and these are superimposed upon the
especially for reduction of area. At 1200 F, a scatter bands, Figs. 3.0a-c. Reasonably good con-
slight tendency for lower ductility at longer rup- formity with the few data is evident.
ture time may be detected. The ductility of the Minimum creep strengths have also been de-
high strength lot 2-9 falls on the low side rela- veloped by the two evaluation procedures and are
tive to other wrought material. included in Table XI. As expected on the basis
of the few data available, larger differences are
Part 3: 5 Cr - ~ Mo-Si steels; Figs. 29-35 observed than is evident for the average values.

The time for rupture data are plotted in Figs. Rupture Ductility
29a-c, the secondary creep rate data in Figs. 30a-
c, and the rupture ductility data in Figs. 3la-f. The relatively few ductility data show good rupture
ductility within the restricted time and tempera-
Rupture Strength ture limits that they represent.

The universalized Larson-Miller rupture parameter Part 4: 5 Cr - Y, Mo-Ti steels; Figs. 36-42
scatter band (c = 20) is shown as Fig. 32. Inspec-
tion reveals that the few data for castings fell The time-for-rupture data are plotted in Figs.
outside the scatter band of data for wrought metal. 36a-c, the secondary creep rate data in Figs.
Within this latter category, there is no evidence 37a-b and the rupture ductility data in Figs.
for an effect of room temperature strength level 38a-b. The number of data are extremely sparse
upon rupture strength (or creep strength), but it except for temperatures of 1000 and 1200 F.
should be noted, Fig. 9b, that the limited data
did not encompass a significant range in room temp- Rupture Strength
erature strength. Average and minimum t~end
curves for wrought metal, by the method of least The universalized Larson-Miller rupture parameter
squares, have been superimposed upon the data scatter band (c = 20) is shown in Fig. 39. All of
scatter band. the data represent wrought material. However, in-
The individual lot rupture strength evalua- spection of Fig. 39 reveals that the data are
tions are plotted against temperature in Figs. 33a- poorly distributed, and it seems possible that the
c with superimposed best fit average and minimum data population might be mixed, or perhaps that
trend curves. Tabulated values for the individual there is important microstructural instability.
lot evaluations are included in Table VI. Rupture The limited tensile strength data at room tempera-
strengths derived from the trend curves are in- ture, Fig. lOb, show only a very limited range in
cluded in Tables VIII and IX. Also superimposed values and therefore offer no explanation. The
upon Figs. 33a-c are average rupture strength least squares analysis of the data showed minimum
curves computed from the average trend curve for variance for the third order, but such a trend
the parameterized data plot of Fig. 32. These curve appeared unreasonable in shape, presumably
values as well as minimum values not shown in Figs. reflecting the particular data distribution; ac-
33a-c, are tabulated in Tables VIII and IX. Com- cordingly the data were forced to a quadratic fit,
parison of the average trend curves of Figs. 33a-c with slightly greater variance. This trend curve
shows very good agreement in the results developed is shown superimposed upon the data. A minimum

12
curve derived from the average is also shown. Rupture Strength
The individual lot rupture strength evalua-
tions are plotted in Figs. 40a-c and are included The universalized Larson-Miller rupture parameter
in Table VI. With the individual lot values scatter band (c = 20) is plotted in Fig. 46. The
bunched at the two temperatures 1000 and 1200 F, data appear reasonably distributed in contrast with
the least squares evaluation not surprisingly in- the scatter for 5 Cr - ~Mo-Ti steel. Average and
dicated a nonlinear interrelation between the var- minimum trend lines have been superimposed upon the
iables, which, on inspection, seemed unreasonable. data of Fig. 46.
lt therefore seemed best to force a linear relation, The individual lot rupture strength evalua-
and accordingly the average and minimum trend tions are tabulated in Table Vl and plotted in
curves for the individual lots shown in Figs. 40a-c Figs. 47a-c. Average and minimum rupture strength
and included in Tables VIII and IX reflect this vs temperature trend lines are superimposed upon
arbitrary decision. Also superimposed upon Figs. the data and included in Tables VIII and IX. Also
40a-c are average trend curves computed from the plotted in Figs. 47a-c are average trend curves
master parameter trend curve of Fig. 39. These computed from the master parameter trend curve of
values, as well as minimum values not shown in Fig. 46. These values, as well as minimum values
Figs. 40a-c, are included in Tables Vlll and IX. not plotted in Fig. 46, are included in Tables
In view of the poor character and quantity of the Vlll and IX. Comparison of the average trend
data and the arbitrary judgments concerning the curves of Figs. 47a-c shows very good agreement
least squares analyses, the agreement between the between the results developed by the two evalua-
results by the two evaluation procedures is good. tion procedures.
From the average parameter trend curve of Isothermal log stress vs log time for rupture
Fig. 39, isothermal log stress vs log time for curves have also been computed from the average
rupture curves have been computed and are super- parameter trend curve of Fig. 46, and these are
imposed upon the data plots of Figs. 36a-c. At superimposed upon the plots of Figs. 43a-c. Good
1000 F, agreement is poor; this is also evident in conformity is evident.
Fig. 40a, where the individual lot evaluations
should be accurate since they involve principally Creep Strength
interpolation on the isothermal plot. On this
argument, the strength-temperature regression for The universalized Larson-Miller secondary creep
the individual lots in Fig. 3 has also given a too- rate scatter band is plotted in Fig. 48 with
conservative result. superimposed average and minimum trend curves.
The individual lot creep strength evaluations
Creep Strength are tabulated in Table VII and plotted in Fig. 49.
Average and minimum trend curves for the limited
The universalized Larson-Miller secondary creep data are superimposed on the data of Fig. 49 and
rate parameter scatter band is shown in Fig. 41, included in Tables X and XI. Average and minimum
from which it is evident that the number of data trend curves were also computed from the master
is quite limited. Average and minimum trend curves parameter trend curves of Fig. 48. The average
are superimposed upon the data. and minimum values are included in Tables X and
The individual lot creep strength evaluations XI. The average values have also been plotted in
are tabulated in Table VII and plotted in Fig. 42. Fig. 49 for comparison with the individual lot
Average and minimum trend curves, by the least trend curves. Agreement is fairly good for 0.1%
squares procedure, are superimposed upon the data, per 1000 hours but poor for 0.01% per 1000 hours
and tabulated in Tables X and XI. Little confi- at temperatures above about 1050 F. Finally, the
dence can be attached to the trend curves since master parameter curve has permitted computing
there are so few data. (For this same reason, the isothermal log stress vs secondary creep rate
trend curves were arbitrarily forced to a linear curves, and these have been superimposed on Figs.
variation.) Also superimposed upon the plots of 44a-b. They are in reasonable conformity with the
Fig. 42 are computed average trend curves by the data.
parameter evaluation procedure, which probably
warrant more confidence than the individual lot Rupture Ductility
trend curves. These average creep strengths by
the parameter procedure as well as minimum values, The relatively few data exhibit no evidence for im-
not plotted, are included in Tables X and Xl. paired ductility within the restricted limits
Isothermal log stress vs log secondary creep represented.
rate curves, computed from the master parameter
curve, Fig. 41, are superimposed upon Figs. 37a-b. Part 6: 9 Cr - 1 Mo steel; Figs. 50-56

Rupture Ductility The time for rupture data are plotted in Figs.
50a-c, the secondary creep rate data in Figs.
Only scattered data are available at temperatures 5la-c, and the rupture data in Figs. 52a-d.
other than 1000 and 1200 F. At these two tempera-
tures, elongation remained good at the longest Rupture Strength
test times, none of which, however, exceeded 6000
hours. The universalized Larson-Miller rupture scatter
band, (using a value of 25.1 for the constant, for
Part 5: 7 Cr - ~Mo steel; Figs. 43-49 reasons cited earlier) is shown as Fig. 53, with
superimposed average and minimum trend curves.
The time-for-rupture data for 7 Cr - ~ Mo steel The individual lot rupture strength evalua-
are plotted in Figs. 43a-c, the secondary creep tions are included in Table VI and plotted in
rate data in Figs. 44a-b, and the rupture ductility Figs. 54a-c. Average and minimum trend curves
data in Figs. 45a-e. The relatively few data have been superimposed upon the plots, and tabular
represent bar or tube product forms. values included in Tables Vlll and lX. Average

13
trend lines have been computed from the master 100,000 hours, of interest for setting allowable
parameter curve of Fig. S3, and are also super- stresses under the ASME Code, the average values
imposed upon the plots of Figs. S4a-c. Tabular for other grades were sometimes more conservative
values for these average curves and also for min- by the one procedure and sometimes by the other,
imum trend curves, not plotted in Figs. S4a-c, are and similarly for minimum rupture strength. Thus,
included in Tables VIII and IX. The agreement be- the choice between the results by the two pro-
tween the average trend curves developed by the cedures is not, on this basis, readily apparent.
individual lot and parameter evaluation procedures However, the parameter procedure does suffer from
is increasingly poor below about 1100 F as the ref- the disadvantage that it cannot provide 100,000
erence time is extended beyond 1000 hours. Since hour values at the higher test temperatures, un-
the discrepancy is such that the parameter pro- less a hazardous extrapolation of the master para-
cedure produces the more conservative result, one meter curve is made. This disadvantage derives
possible explanation for the discrepancy is that a from the tradeoff between short time at higher
strengthening reaction occurs at lower temperature temperature and longer time at low temperature
that is not influential at the higher temperatures, that is inherent in the time-temperature parameter.
an inherent and well-recognized possible complica- As a consequence, 100,000 hour strengths towards
tion of the parameter evaluation procedure. In the top of the temperature range of practical
this connection, it is of interest that the secon- interest cannot be developed unless tests are made
dary creep rate parameter scatter band to be dis- at even higher temperature. Such tests have seldom
cussed later, Fig. SS, does exhibit an unusual been included in the data gathered by MPC. Prin-
upward concavity. Perhaps a greater volume of cipally for this reason, then, it seems that the
rupture data representing lower parameter values choice between evaluation procedures for 100,000
would have resulted in an appropriately modified hour rupture strength should favor the individual
master parameter curve for rupture. lot procedure.
Isothermal log ~tress vs log_ time for rupture
curves have been computed from the average para- Creep Strength
meter trend curve of Fig. S3, and these have been
superimposed upon the plots of Figs. SOa-c. With In general, there was good agreement between the
reference to the discussion of the preceding para- results by the two evaluation procedures, and no
graph, it is of interest that the computed curves readily apparent basis for choosing between them.
fall below the data at 1000 and 900 F, but, of However, in contrast with 100,000 rupture strength
course, the data are few in number. for which extrapolation in time is always involved,
evaluation of the secondary creep rate data for
Creep Strength the stress for 0.01% per 1000 hours may involve
data interpolation, and parameter methods serve an
The universalized Larson-Miller secondary creep important purpose in correlating data. Also, there
rate parameter scatter band is shown in Fig. SS, were often relatively few creep rate data, such
with superimposed average trend curve. As cited that, for example, creep strength (0.01 percent
above, this trend curve has an uncommon upward per 1000 hours) could not be appraised at tempera-
concavity. tures below 1000 F for several of the grades.
The individual lot creep strength evaluations For these reasons, it has seemed best, on the
are t.abulat.ed in Table Vll, and plotted in Fig. 56. whole, to favor the parameter result for the stress
Average and minimum trend curves, which exhibited to cause a secondary creep rate of 0.01 percent
least variance for the first order interdependence per 1000 hours.
of the variables, are shown superimposed upon the
data, Fig. S6, and are included in tabular form in COMPARISON OF GRADES
Tables X and XI. Also superimposed upon the plots
of Fig. S6 are average trend curves computed from The yield and tensile strength ratio trend curves
the master parameter curve. These average values of the six grades of steel are compared in Figs.
as well as mininrum values, not plotted in Fig. S6, S7 and SS. In either instance, there is no orderly
are tabulated in Tables X and XI. The agreement trend evident for the dependence upon alloy con-
between the average values in Fig. S6 are fair for tent. Differences are sometimes small, as for
the 0.1% per 1000 hour rate, good for the 0.01% examples amongst grades 21, S, Sb and 9 for yield
per 1000 hour rate at 1000 and 1100 F, but diver- strength ratios at temperatures between 7S and
gent at higher temperatures. 700 F, and may not be stat.ist.ically meaningful.
A comparison of computed isothermal curves The average rupture strengths (100,000 hours)
with the test data is afforded by Figs. Sla-c. of the 6 grades are compared in Fig. S9 and the
Reasonable conformity is evident. average creep strengths (0.01% per 1000 hours) in
Fig. 60. Here, there is a measure of orderliness,
Rupture Ductility with the 9 Cr - 1 Mo and 3 Cr - 1 Mo grades ex-
hibiting greater strength than the S to 7 Cr - ~ Mo
Within the limits of the data, extending to beyond grades (except at the highest temperatures in the
10,000 hours at several temperatures, ductility is case of creep strength). Again, the extent to
maintained at greater than 20 percent elongation. which the differences are significant is uncertain.

CHOICE BETWEEN EVALUATION PROCEDURES ACKNOWLEDG~IENTS

Rupture The evaluations of this report were performed for


The Metal Properties Council under the guidance of
In general there was good agreement between the the Council's Subcommittee I on Engineering Pro-
results of the individual lot and universalized perties of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Materials,
parameter evaluations. An exception is the rupture of which Dr. M. Semchyshen is Chairman.
strength of 9 Cr - 1 Mo steel, particularly for
100,000 hours. With particular reference to

14
References 17. Oak Ridge National Laboratory; unpublished
work of P. Rittenhouse.
1. W. F. Sinunons and H. C. Cross: Report of the
Elevated-Temperature Properties of Chromium-
Molybdenum Steels; ASTM STP No. 151 (1953).

2. J.A. Van Echo and W. F. Simmons: Supplemental


Report on the Elevated-Temperature Properties
of Chromium-~lybdenum Steels; ASTM Data
Series No. OS 6Sl (1966).

3. Resume of High Temperature Investigations


Conducted During 1955-56; The Timken Roller
Bearing Co., Steel and Tube Div., Canton,
Ohio (1956).

4. Lukens Steel Co.

5. H. R. Voorhees and J. W. Freeman: The Elevated-


Temperature Properties of Weld-Deposited Metal
and Weldments; ASTM STP No. 226 (1958).

6. Compilation of Available High-Temperature


Creep Characteristics of Metals and Alloys;
Joint ASTM-ASME Committee on Effect of Temper-
ature on the Properties of .Metals; March 1938,
published by ASTM and ASME, Phil. and New York.

7. Timken Roller Bearing Co., Steel and Tube Div.,


Canton, Ohio; Resumes of High Temperature
Investigations 1940 et seq.; also Digest of
Steels; also unpublished data.

8. G. N. Emmanuel and W. E. Leyda: Long-Time


High Temperature Properties of Cr-Mo Weld
Metal; in "Properties of Weldments at Ele-
vated Temperatures; ASME (1968).

9. U. S. Steel Corp.

10. Babcock and Wilcox Co.

11. Combustion Engineering, Inc.

12. I. Finnie and A. E. Bayce: Creep-Rupture


Tests on 9% Cr - 1% Mo Furnace Tube Material;
Proc. of Joint Int. Conf. on Creep, New York
(Aug. 1963), London (Oct. 1963).

13. G. V. Smith: Supplemental Report on the


Elevated Temperature Properties of Chromium-
Molybdenum Steels (An Evaluation of 2\ Cr -
1 ~Steel); ASTM Data Series Publication
DS 6S2, March 1971.

14. G. V. Smith: Evaluation of the Elevated


Temperature Tensile and Creep-Rupture Pro-
perties of Y, Cr - Y, Mo, 1 Cr - Y, Mo and
1\ Cr - Y, Mo-Si Steels; ASTM Data Series
Publication OS SO, September 1973.

15. G. V. Smith: Quenched and Tempered Steels for


Pressure Vessel Service at Elevated Tempera-
tures; Second International Conferenc·e on
Pressure Vessel Technology, San Antonio,
Oct. 1973; Part 3, page 273.
16. W. E. Leyda and J. P. Rowe: Application of
the Larson-Miller Parameter Method for
Evaluation of Data in the Interests of
Materials Acceptance; in "Time-Temperature
Parameters for Creep-Rupture Analysis; Amer.
Soc. for Metals Pub. No. 08-100, Oct. 1968.

15
Table I

Identification of Steels

A.STM Ref.
Code Spec. Deoxid. Heat (l) Product Code
G:aiy 2 )
No. No. Pr act. Treatment Form-Size Size Ref. No.

Part 1 - 3 Cr - 1 Mo steels

1-1 A-213 "Annealed'' Bar, l" 5-6 1 2


1-2 A-213 Al600 Bar, l" 5-8M 1 4
1-3
1-4
Si-Al Ct lb) Al550
Nl650, Tl380
Forged
Wrought
5-7M 1
1
5
6
1-5 A-213 Annealed Bar, 3/4" 2 7~90
1-6 A-213 Not reported Tube 2. 5"00>< .5" 3
l-7a(3) Nl750, Tl325 Plate, 7 11/16" 6 4
l-7b(3) Nl 750, Tl275 Plate, 7 11/16" 6 4
l-7c Ql700,Tll25 Plate, 7 11/16" 6 4
l-7d Nl700,Tl325,Tl275 Plate, 7 11/16" 6 4
l-7e (Note 4) ,Tl300,Tl350 Plate, 11" 6.5 4
l-7f (Note 4) ,Tl285 Plate, 11" 6.5 4
l-7g (Note 4) ,Tl250 Plate, 11 '' 6.5 4
l-8a Ql700,Tll25 Plate, 3 5/8" 4
l-8b Ql 700. Tl 225 Plate, 3 5/8" 4
l-8c Ql 700. Tl 325 Plate, 3 5/8" 4
Wl-9a As welded Weld metal 5
Wl-9b 'fl350 l\'eld metal 5
Wl-10 Electro-slag Ql775,Tll25 \'leldmetal, 7.5" 8 1238
1-11 Nl675,Tl325,Tl275 Plate, 7 11/16" 4

Part 2 - 5 Cr - 12 Mo steels

2-1 Nl650,Tll90 Bar, 3/4" 6 c2b


2-2 Nl 650, Tl 320 Bar, 3/4" 6 c2c
2-3a Nl700,Al550 Bar, l" 6 c3a-l
2-3b Al550 Bar, l" 6 c3a-2
2-4 Al575 Tube, 5"><3/4"w 6 c8b
2-5a Al550 Tube, 5"><5/8"w 6 clOa-1
2-5b Al550, Tl425 Tube, 5"><5/8"w 6 clOa-2
2-5c Nl550 ,Tl425 Tube, 5"><5/ 8"w 6 clOb-1
2-5d Al550 1\Jbe, 5"><5/8"w 6 clOc
2-5e N2100,Tl425 Tube, 5 11 ><5/ 8"w 6 clOd
2-5f A2100 Tube, 5"><5/8''w 6 clOe
2-6a .A.1550,Tl425 Tube, 5"><S/8"w 6 cl Of
2-6b Nl550, Tl425 Tube, 5"><5/8"w 6 clOg

(1) A-Annealed; N-normalized; HR-hot rolled; T-tcmpered or stress-re 1 icved; Q-quenched.


( 2 ) Actual grain size, except when identified as ~I for ~lcQuaid-Ehn.
3
( )1" slice from quarterline; treated to simulate W.(). of 8 11 plate.
4
( ) l" slice treated to simulate W.Q. at centerline of 11" plate.

16
Table I - page 2

ASTM Ref.
Code Spec. Deoxid. Heat Product Grain Code
No. No. Pr act. Treatment Form-Size Size Ref. No.

2-6c .A.1550 Tube, 5"x5/8"w 6 clOh


2-6d N2100,T1425 Tube, 5"x5/8"w 6 clOi-1
2-6e N2100,Tl425 Tube, 5 "x5/ 8"w 6 clOi-2
2-6f i\2100 Tube, 5"x5/8"w 6 clOj
2-7 Al600 Cast, 1% 11 6 c8
2-8* Si-Al (1 lb) Al550 Bar, l" 7-8 1,7 1
2-9 A-182 Nl675,Tl025,Tll25 forging, 18" 8 1 2
2-10 Al550 Wrought 6~8 1 3
2-11 Annealed Wrought 1 6
2-12 Zr-Al Nl850,T1250 Cast 1 7
2-13 Zr-Al Nl850,Tl250 Cast 1 10
2-14 Zr-Al Nl850, T1250 Cast 1 11
2-15 Al600 Wrought 1 14
2-16 Nl600,T1380 Wrought 9 1 15
2-17 Nl650,T1275 Cast 1 16
2-18 Al (2 lb) Nl800,Tl300 Cast 1 17
2-19 A-213 Annealed per A-213 Tube, 4"x.5"w 2 7-91
2-20 Annealed per i\-213 Bar, 3/4" 2 7-92
2-2la Al580 Bar, l" 7
2-2lb Al650 Bar, l" 7
2-22a Al580 Rar, l" 7
2-22b 1\1650 Bar, l" 7
2-23a Al500 Bar, l" 7
2-23b Al650 Bar, l" 7
2-24 Al580 Bar, l" 7
2-25 Al580 Bar, l" 7
2-26 "Process Annealed" Tube, 5"xS/8"w 7
2-27 Annealed Tube, 3"x.63"w 7
2-28 Annealed Tube, 3.5"x.59"w - 7
2-29 Tl200 Tube, 5.5"x.375"w - 7
2-30 T1200 Tube, 5.5"x.375"w - 7
W2-3la Metal arc As welded Weld metal 5 1
W2-3lb Metal arc T1350 Weld metal 5 1
W2-32 Metal arc As welded Weld metal 5 2

Part 3 - 5 Cr - Yz Mo-Si steels

3-1 Nl800,Ql600,Tl425 Cast 1 l**


3-2 Si-Al (1.5 lb) i\1550 Bar, l" 7-8 1 l***
3-3 "Annealed" Wrought I 2,9
3-4 Al650 Wrought 8-9 1 ~

* Same as 2-3b
**
Categorized as 1% Si steel in Ref. 1.
***
Categorized as 1.5% Si steel in Ref. 1.

17
Table I - page 3

ASTM Pef.
Code Spec. Deoxid. Heat Product Grain Code
No. No. Pract. Treatment Form-Size Size Ref. No .

3-5 SA-213 .\nnealed Bar, 1" 8 1 4


3-6 A-158 f..nneale<l Bar, l" 7M 1 5
3-7 Tl250 Cast 1 6
3-8a As cast Cast 1 7
3-Bb Tl250 Cast 1 7
3-9 A-213 .l\nnealed per A-213 Tube 2 7-94
3-10 AlSSO Bar 7
3-11 A-213 Annealed per A-213 Bar, 3/4" 10 E

Part 4 - 5 Cr - -~ ~lo-Ti steels

4-1 Si-Al (1 lb) Al600 Bar, 1" 8 1


4-2 Tl37S Wrought 3,7 1 2,4
4-3 Annealed Wrought 1 3
4-4 SA-213 ~1575 Bar, l" 7-8 1 5
4-5a Al Al550 Wrought 1,6~8 1 6A
4-5b Al NI 750 Wrought 6-8 1 6N
4-6a Al AlSSO Wrought 7-8 1 7A
4-6b Al NI 750 Wrought 5-7 1 7N
4-7a Al Al550 Wrought 6-8 1 8,'..
4-7b Al Nl750 Wrought 4-7 1 SN
4-Sa Al AlSSO Wrought 1 9A
4-Bb Al 1\1750 Wrought 1 9B
4-Sc Al Tl350 Wrought 5-7 1 9C
4-9a Al AlSS0-1600 Wrought 8 1 lOA
4-9b Al Nl750 Wrought 7-8 1 ION
4-10 f..1850 Wrought 1 12
4-11 Tl380 Wrour,ht 8-9 1 13
4-12 Wrought 7
4-13 Al600 Wrought 7-8 7

1,
Part 5 - 7 Cr - ·2 Mo steels

5-1 Si-.~.l ( 1. 3 lb) .''17'.iO,AlSOO Bar, l" 8 1, 7 1


5-2 Annealed Wrought 1 2
5-3 Al 5 75 Bar, l" 1,1n 3
5-4 Si-Al (1. 4 lb) AlSSO Bar, 1" 2 7-106
5-5 f'.nnealed per A-213 Bar, 3/4" 2 7-107
5-6 Annealed per A-213 Tube 2, 10 7-108
5-7 Al575 \\'rought 10
WS-8a Metal arc As weldecl ll'eld metal 5
WS-8b ~!et:ll arc .1\1350 \\'eld metal 5

18
Table I - page 4

ASTM Ref.
Code Spec. Deoxid. Heat Product Grain Code
No. No. Pr act. Treatment Form-Size Size Ref. No.

Part 6 - 9 Cr - 1 Mo steels

6-1 Si-Al (1 lb) Nl750,Tl500 Bar, 1" 8 1, 7 1


6-2 Annealed Wrought 1 2
6-3 Al 700 Wrought 8 1 3
6-4 SA-213 Al600 Bar, l" 1 4
6-5 Si-Al (1 lb) Al550 Forged 6-8M 1,9· 5
6-6 Wrought 1 6
6-7 Wrou~ht 1 8
6-8 Al (2 lb) Nl650,Tl240 Cast 1 9
6-9 Al700 Wrought 1 10
6-10 Found to be same as Code 6-3
6-11 Tl475 Tube, 2x.32" 2,7 7-llla
6-12 Tl475 Tube, 2.lx.23 11 2 7-lllh
6-13 Tl475 Tube, 2.lx.23" 2 7-lllc
6-14 Tl475 Tube, 2.lx.23" 2 7-112a
6-15 Tl475 Tube, 2.lx.23" 2 7-l 12b
6-16 Annealed per A-213 Bar, 3/4" 2 7-113
6-17 Annealed per A-213 Tube, 4%x .5" 2 7-114
6-18 Al625 Bar, l" 7
6-19 Tl475 Tube,2 l/8x.232" 7
6-20 Tl475 Tube,2 l/8x.232" - 7
6-21 Annealed per A-213 Bar 10
6-22 Annealed per A-213 Bar, 1" 10
6-23/6-64 A-213 Proc. Anneal. Tube 7
1200 min.
6-65 SA-213 Tl450 Tube 11
6-66 SA-213 Al625 Tube, 1.68~" 11
6-67 SA-213 Al625 Tube, 1. 6Elxl:'f" 11
W6-68a Metal arc As welded Weld metal 5 2
W6-68b Metal arc Al350 Weld metal 5 2
6-69 A200-58 Tube 6 12
6-70 A200-58 Tube 7 12
6-71 A200-58 Tube 7 12
6-72 A200-58 Tube 6 12
6-73 A200-58 Tube 6 12

19
Table II

Chemical Composition of Steels

Code No. c Mn p s Si (T Ni llo Cu Al Other

Part 1 - 3 Cr - 1 Mo steels

1-1 .10 .60 .01 .009 .40 3.13 .94


1-2 .09 .43 .017 .012 .33 3.0S .93
1-3 .11 .4S .OU .021 .39 3.21 • 21 .97 .001 .016N
1-4 .12 .S2 .012 . 023 .4S 3.46 .96
1-S .11 .44 .024 .017 . 29 2.93 .33 .89 .16
1-6 .12 .46 .014 .011 .36 2.97 .24 .80
1-7 .14 .44 .OlS .029 .27 2.92 .20 .9S . 2S .018 .003V
1-8 .14 .43 .010 .021 .29 2.90 .22 .93 .lS .010
Wl-9 .OS .SS .013 .018 .42 3.4S .91
Wl-10 .10 .68 .024 .019 .14 2.9S .10 1.03 .20
i-11 .14 .44 .OlS .029 .27 2.92 .9S

Part 2 -s Cr - ~ Mo steels

2-1 .20 .17 .03 S.07 .so


2-2 .27 .3S . 019 .032 .37 S.91 .20 .SS
2-3a,b .10 .4S .017 . 015 .18 S.09 .SS
2-4 . lS .3S .2S S.23 .56
2-Sa-e .18 .40 . OlS .014 .33 4.96 .26 .49
2-6a-f .14 .38 .017 .OlS .3S 4.63 .S4
2-7 .lS .46 .17 4. 85 .Sl
2-8 .10 .4S .011 .013 .18 S.09 .SS
2-9 . 26 .46 .DOS .020 .24 4.61 .19 .48
2-10 .13 .42 .030 .017 .22 4.69 .47 .004 .021N
2-11 .lS .4S .so s.o .so
2-12 . 08 .81 .49 4.92 .S6 .so .077 .004Zr
2-13 .19 .69 .46 4.90 .S3 .54 .074 . 034Zr
2-14 .23 .61 .S2 S.04 .SS .so .OS9 . 04Zr
2-lS .11 . 39 .016 .011 .36 S.44 .62
2-16 .12 . 38 .017 .007 .44 5.41 .15 .S2
2-17 .23 .S7 .020 .020 . 36 S.46 .s 1 .so
2-18 . 28 .70 . 024 .012 .47 s. 25 .62 . OS
2-19 .11 . 48 .017 .013 .40 4.88 .lS .SS
2-20 .11 .47 .OlS .OlS .37 4.8S .22 .S3
2-21 .12 .43 .014 .026 .32 4.96 .SS
2-22 .14 .44 .014 .025 .3S S.18 .S7
2-23 .13 .42 .014 .020 .33 S.16 .S8
2-24 .12 .46 . OlS .016 .38 S.18 .S3
2-25 .12 .40 . OlS . OlS .30 4.74 .S3
2-26 . 12 .43 .018 .023 .3S S.09 .S2
2-27 .10 .36 .007 .013 . 34 4.81 .18 .Sl .08 .026
2-28 .12 .39 .009 .018 .29 s .10 .15 .S2 .09
2-29 .11 .44 .012 .009 . 3S 4.90 .19 .54 .10
2-30 .10 .36 .007 . 013 .34 4.81 . 18 .s1 . 08 .026

20
Table II - page 2

Code No. c Mn p s Si Cr Ni Mo Cu Al Other

W2-31 Not available


W2-32 .06 . 7B .Oll .017 .70 S.40 . lB .S4

Part 3 - s Cr - ~ Mo-Si steels

3-1 .23 .66 . 02B . OOB LOB 4.96 .so


3-2 .10 .3B .009 . Oll I.SS 4.B3 .Sl
3-3 Nominal
3-4 .13 . 26 . Oll .010 l.S7 S.24 .so
3-S .146 .2B .013 .011 I.SS S.22 .S4
3-6 .OB .3B .007 .014 l.S3 4.90 .S2
3-7 .21 .74 l.S3 S.03 .SS .S2
3-B . ll . 77 I.SO S.07 .62 .S2
3-9 .11 .Sl .013 .013 1.46 4.B4 .26 .Sl • ll
3-10 .13 .44 .012 .013 1.24 S.2B .so
3-ll • ll .47 . OlS .012 1. 31 4.7S .Sl

Part 4 -s Cr -· ~ Mo-Ti steels Ti

4-1 .10 .44 .Oll .013 .3B 4.9B .so .Sl


4-2 .OS .40 .006 .Oll .31 S.19 .29 .Sl .07S .SS .007N
4-3 Nominal
4-4 .062 .4S .OlS .010 .40 s .13 .S6 .43
4-Sa,b .07 .41 .017 .007 .32 s .46 . S7 .S4
4-6a,b .06 .40 .013 .008 .4B S.43 .49 .4B
4-7a,b .06 .43 .OlS .010 . 2S s. 72 .4B .41
4-Ba-c .OB .3B .OlB .007 .40 S.16 .so .49
4-9a,b .10 .44 .010 .010 .3B 4.9B .so .Sl
4-10 .06 .36 .010 .OOB .41 S.lB .SB .46
4-11 .06 . 36 .010 .008 .41 S.lB .19 .SB .46
4-12 .10 .44 .011 .013 .3B 4.9B .so .Sl
4-13 .12 .4S .011 .013 .37 S.07 . 21 .4B .S2

Part s - 7 Cr - ~ Mo steels

S-1 . ll .43 .010 .011 .92 7.33 .S9


S-2 Nominal
S-3 .09B . 37 .014 .OlS .BO 7.04 .53
S-4 .13 .so .007 .003 .BB 7.34 .11 .S2 .09 .OlBN
s-s .12 .4S .018 .024 .80 6.70 .20 .47 .14
S-6 .11 .49 .014 .013 • 72 7.17 .19 .so .03
S-7 .11 .4S .97 7 .26 .SB
WS-Ba,b .OS .S2 . 012 . 007 .44 7.SS .46

21
Table II - page 3

Other
Code No. c Mn p s Si Cr Ni Mo Cu Al Ti

Part 6 - 9 Cr - 1 Mo steels

6-1 . 12 .44 • Oll . 010 .67 9.SO .9S


6-2 Nominal
6-3 .099 .38 .013 . OlS .32 8.21 .14 1. 06
6-4 .194 .38 .12 9.S4 .98
6-S .09 .44 • 022 . 021 .6S 8.94 .28 .89 .017 .002 .02SN
6-6 . 07 . 74 .OlS . 029 .38 9.S3 1.30
6-7 .12 .4S • 012 .020 .48 8.90 1.01
6-8 .23 .3S .023 .007 .34 8.92 .94
6-9 .12 .43 • Oll . OlS .43 9.47 . 10 1.04
6-10 .099 .38 .018 .OlS .32 8.21 .14 1.06
6-11 . ll .48 .013 .013 . 7S 8.42 .37 .98
6-12 .12 •s 1 . 016 .014 .48 8.S7 .20 .92
6-13 .10 .54 .017 .016 .52 8.30 .12 l.00
6-14 .10 .so . 014 .'014 .Sl 8. 49 • lY' 1.00
6-lS . ll .46 .Oll . 016 .83 8. 2S .21 .9S
6-16 .14 .49 .013 . 016 .40 8.41 .31 1. 00
6-17 . ll .so . OlS .010 .44 8.44 .19 .98
6-18 .10 .43 .010 . 020 .41 8.S7 .23 .86
6-19 .10 .4S . Oll .016 .S4 8.S9 .ls 1.04
6-20 .10 .46 . Oll . 018 .S6 8. so .12 1.00
6-21* .10 .38 . 12 9.S4 .98
6-22 . 12 .40 .024 .016 .33 9.24 1.43
6-23 .ll .S4 .011 .014 .S3 8.20 .19 .93
6-24 .09 .S3 .014 . OlS .46 8.44 .17 1.01
6-2S .086 .S4 .013 . 018 .64 8.7S .21 1.00
6-26 .086 .S4 .013 .018 .64 8.7S .21 1.00
6-27 .11 .47 .011 .013 .4S 8.38 .24 1.00
6-28 . 12 .so .008 . OlS .S7 8.S7 .20 1.02
6-29 . ll .S3 .013 .014 .so 8 .81 .24 1.00
6-30 . ll .60 . Oll .OlS .42 8.3S .24 .98
6-31 . 12 .so . 008 .OlS .S7 8.S7 • 20 1.02
6-32 .12 .so .008 .OlS .57 a.s7 .20 1.02
6-33 .09 .46 .010 .012 .S7 8.S2 .29 1.03
6-34 .12 .47 .013 .OlS .S2 8.34 .14 I.OS
6-3S .12 .47 .013 .OlS .52 8. 34 .14 I.OS
6-36 .09 .46 .010 . 012 .S7 8.S2 . 29 1. 03
6-37 . ll .46 .OlS . Oll .44 8.28 .16 1.00
6-38 .12 .51 .008 .009 .38 8.53 .22 .99
6-39 . ll .S3 .013 .014 .so 8.81 .24 1.00
6-40 .ll .46 .011 .014 .so 8.20 .18 1.00
6-41 .10 .S2 .012 . 012 .60 8.3S .09 .98
6-42 . 12 .47 .013 .OlS .S2 8.34 .14 LOS
6-43 . ll .so .010 .Oll .S2 8.98 .23 1.01
6-44 . ll .60 .Oll .OlS .42 8 .3S .09 .98
6-4S .10 .S2 .012 .012 .60 8.3S .09 .98
6-46 .10 .so .012 .012 .S2 8.40 .ls .98

Silicon does not meet requirement of A-213.

22
Table II - page 4

Code No. c Mn p s Si Cr Ni Mo Cu Al Other

6-47 .11 .so .010 .011 .S2 8.98 .23 1.01


6-48 .10 .so .012 .012 .S2 8.40 .lS .98
6-49 .10 .so .010 .011 .41 8.01 .20 1.00
6-SO .11 .47 .011 .012 .42 8.20 .29 .99
6-Sl .11 .so .011 .013 .Sl 8.44 .14 .98
6-S2 .11 .40 .010 .012 .S4 8.40 .19 1.04
6-S3 .10 .so .010 .011 .41 8.01 .20 1.00
6-S4 .10 .47 .014 .OlS .S2 8.SO .14 .99
6-SS .09 .S3 .009 .012 .S6 8.11 .18 .98
6-S6 .09 .S3 .009 . 012 .S6 8.11 .18 .98
6-S7 .10 .47 .014 .OlS .S2 8.SO .14 .99
6-S8 .09 .46 .009 . 012 .S7 8 .61 .16 .98
6-S9 .11 .40 .010 .012 .S4 8.40 .19 1.04
6-60 .11 .4S . 014 .011 .S3 8.S2 .17 .98
6-61 .11 .so .011 .006 .40 8.19 .34 .99
6-62 .09 .49 .012 .012 .S2 8.S8 .20 .98
6-63 .10 .46 .011 .012 .61 8.64 . 21 1.00
6-64 .09 .S4 .010 .011 .S6 8.SO .16 .98
6-6S .13 .47 .012 .006 .41 8.S4 1.00
6-66 .12 .46 .014 .004 .34 8.61 1.0S
6-67 .12 .46 .012 .004 .33 8.S7 1.0S
W6-68a,b .OS .7S .014 .019 .S7 9.27 1.2S
6-69 .14 .30 .024 .016 .44 9.27 .20 1.02
6-70 .14 .4S .024 . 020 .S6 9.20 .02 .99
6-71 .11 .42 .019 .019 .66 9.01 . lS .90
6-72 .08 .34 .021 .007 . 77 8.96 .11 .93
6-73 .12 .39 .016 . 007 .67 9.02 .10 .91

23
Table III

Short-Time Tensile Properties

1000 ESi Percent


Test
Code No. Temp. OF Yield Strength* Tensile Strength Elong.+ Red. Area

Part 1 - 3 Cr - 1 Mo steels

1-1 7S 34.0a 69.8 39. 78.


sso 2S.Sa S7.0 3S. 77.
6SO 2S.8a S7.4 30. 73.
7SO 2S.Oa 60.0 30. 73.
8SO 21.6a S6.8 32. 74.
9SO 22.8a S2.0 37. 77.
lOSO 19.2a 42.2 so. 86.
1-2 70 36.0 72.2 33. 72.
800 33.6 S8.7 24. 67.
900 33. 2 S3.4 36. 76.
1000 29.8 4S.2 40. 82.
llOO 23.1 3S.7 48. 88.
1200 19.7 24.6 S7. 93.
1300 13.6 18.9 69. 96.
1400 9.8 11.6 83. 98.
1-3 80 37 .·2 72.0 37. 78.
1-6 80 SO.S 72.0 33. (1. S") 72.
lOSO 43.0 48. (l ") 83.
llOO 34. 8 SS. (l") 87.
l-7a 75 70.2 92.5 29. ( l "J 77.
800 60.4 78.8 21. (l") 68.
900 58.8 73.1 23. ( l ") 72.
1000 57.0 65.5 27. ( l ") 78.
llOO 51.4 54.3 37. (l ") 87.
1200 43.5 44.8 46. ( l ") 92.
1300 29.4 31.4 60. (l") 96.
l-7b 75 92.3 110.7 24. (l ") 71.
800 75.4 90.4 21. (l ") 68.
900 71.4 82.9 22. (l") 72.
1000 69.3 74.9 23. (l ") 74.
llOO 62. 3 64.8 32. ( l ") 83.
1200 52.6 54.0 41. (l ") 88.
1300 34.6 37.1 46. ( l ") 92.
l-7c 75 102.8 119. 0 24. ( l ") 74.
800 86.3 96.4 21. (l ") 71.
900 81.5 91.0 23. (l ") 72.
1000 75.2 80.0 24. ( l ") 77.
llOO 73.4 75.9 22. (l ") 80.
1200 S3.3 60.8 32. ( l ") 85.
1300 41.1 42.6 44. ( l ") 91.

* 0.2% offset, unless noted otherwise.


+ Elongation in 2 inches, unless noted otherwise.
a 0. 1\ offset.

24
Table III - page 2

Test 1000 psi Percent


Code No. Temp. OF Yield Strength Tensile Strength Elong. Red. Area

l-7d 7S 62.2 87.8 31. ( l ") 74.


800 Sl. 7 69.6 24. (l ") 70.
900 Sl.O 64.6 28. (l ") 74.
1000 48.4 SS.9 31. (l ") 79.
1100 43.9 47.9 39. (l ") 86.
1200 38.3 39.S 48. (l ") 92.
1300 30.0 31.1 S7. ( l ") 9S.
l-7e 7S 63.2 86.2 30. (l ") 78.
800 53.6 7S.7 23. (l ") 71.
900 49.6 69.9 26. (l ") 74.
1000 48.2 61.9 30. ( l ") 80.
l-7f 7S 70.2 91. 2 26. (1 ") 77.
800 S8.4 76.S 22. ( l ") 71.
900 S8.2 72.8 23. ( l ") 7S.
1000 S4.8 63.8 28. (l ") 80.
l-7g 7S 74.7 94.S 26. (l ") 76.
800 61.9 79.2 21. ( l ") 71.
900 63.7 7S .8 22. (l ") 7S.
1000 61.1 67.9 26. (l ") 79.
l-8a 7S llS'.3 131.9 20. ( l ") 71.
800 101.1 108.8 19.S ( l ") 68.
900 90. 7 102. R 21. (l ") 71.
1000 87.8 93.6 22. ( l ") 7S.
1100 77. 7 80.S 27. (l ") Rl.
1200 62.9 64.3 30. (l ") 87.
l-8b 7S 90. 9 111. 3 24. (l ") 74.
800 77.0 92.2 20. (l ") 69.
900 73.0 86. 0 23. (l ") 74.
1000 69.3 76.S 27. (l ") 79.
1100 62.S 6S.7 29. ( l ") 8S.
1200 S3.3 SS.2 34. (l ") 88.
l-8c 7S 63. 7 90.7 30. (1 ") 77.
800 S4.9 77.2 23. (l ") 70.
900 S3.l 71.6 26. ( l ") 74.
1000 S0.4 62. 7 32. (l ") 80.
1100 47.4 S2.8 32. (l ") 8S.
1200 38.8 39.4 SS. (l ") 94.
Wl-9a 70 87.S 127.0 18. S4.
800 7S.S 117. 3 20.S S7.
900 69.S 107.0 20.S S9.
1000 68.S 93.S 18. 60.
1100 64.S 68.7 21. 71.
Wl-9b 70 69.0 8S .s 26. 7S.
800 S3.0 66.S 23. 73.
900 S2. 3 60.9 24. 77.
1000 51.0 S6.0 2S.S 80.
1100 44.7 47.0 30. 86.

25
Table III - page 3

1000 psi Percent


Test
Code No. Tem;e. OF Yield Strength Tensile Strength Elong. Red. Area

Wl-10 75 98.7 113. 7 21. 68.


1-11 80 58.2 83.3 34. (I") 74.
300 57.4 76.5 24. (I") 71.
500 54.8 72.5 22. ( l ") 67.
650 55.5 71.5 22. (I") 69.
800 51.2 67.3 22. (I") 68.
850 50.8 62.7 26. (I") 71.
900 50.6 61. 7 26. (l ") 72.
950 49.0 60.6 24. (I") 68.

Part 2 - 5 Cr - ~Mo steels

2-1 70 96.0 120.6 19. 63.


550 87.0 107.0 17. 61.
800 74.0 93.8 19. 62.
1000 62.5 77.8 22. 66.
1200 24.5 46.8 28. 81.
2-2 70 81.5 112. 2 26. 66.
550 72.0 95.5 22. 67.
800 67.0 91.6 20. 63.
1000 59.0 73.4 28. 80.
1200 29.0 48.4 36. 86.
2-3a,b 85 26. 3 66.6 39. 81.
750 21.1 51. 8 30. 77.
900 19.6 48.4 28. 77.
1000 17.3 44.5 28. 73.
1100 15.4 34.4 39. 87.
1200 11. 3 25.8 46. 91.
1300 9.5 19. 1 65. 94.
1400 7.3 13.3 65. 96.
2-4 80 29.5 73.1 32. 67.
900 52.3 32. 74.
2-5a 80 37.3 77.2 32. 74.
1000 18. 7 44. 7 45. 83.
1100 16. 9 36.3 42. 87.
1200 13.1 26.6 56. 88.
2-5b 80 55.3 74.2 32. 77.
2-5c 80 56.7 82.9 32. 78.
2-5d 80 38.7 77.9 30. 65.
1000 19.2 45.6 38. 76.
1100 16.7 35.7 44. 85.
1200 14. 0 27.9 56. 90.
2-5e 80 56.7 83.5 31. 71.
2-5f 80 46.6 83.5 24. 54.
2-6a 80 49.9 69.4 31. 75.
2-6b 80 47.9 76.l 33. 77.

26
Table III - page 4

1000~ Percent
Test - --
Code No. Temp. OF Yield Strength Tensile Streneth Elong. ned. Area
-
2-6c 80 37.7 70.2 34. 73.
1000 17 .1 41.3 46. 80.
1100 IS.I 32.S 4S. 86.
1200 12.6 2S.l 67. 87.
2-6d 80 S7.3 80.2 30. 76.
2-6e 80 S7.0 79.6 32. 73.
2-6f 80 37.1 70.6 28. 60.
2-7 80 31.S 72.7 3S. 68.
900 28.S S7.0 2S. 62.
2-8 75 26.2 66.5 39. 81.
7SO 21. 0 Sl.8 30. 77.
900 19.6 48.4 28. 77.
1000 17.3 44.S 28. 74.
1100 lS.4 34.4 38. 87.
1200 11. 3 2S .8 46. 91.
1300 9.S 19.0 6S. 95.
1400 7.2 13.3 6S. 96.
2-9 7S 104.6 126.4 20. 63.
6SO 110.4 17. 61.
7SO 89.8 106.6 17. 63.
8SO 84.9 99.0 22. 68.
9SO 74.1 84.8 27. 77.
lOSO 62.0 7S.6 27. 80.
1100 S0.2 67.0 27. 83.
2-10 80 26.S 70.S 37. 74.
2-11 70 31.0 71.0 37. 77.
300 6S.O 32. 7S.
soo 61.0 30. 73.
700 S7 .s 30. 73.
900 19.S SO.S 34. 7S.
1100 16.S 33.S 44. 87.
1300 11.0 18.0 66. 9S.
lSOO 9.0
2-12 70 73.0 87.3 20. 41.
2-13 70 81.0 103 .s 21. 46.
2-14 70 87.1 109 .s 20. 41.
2-17 70 71.0 99.S 19. 34.
800 S4.S 73.0 19. 49.
1000 44.0 SS.S 30. 7S.
1200 10.0 3S.2 29. 81.
2-2la 80 27 .3 71.3 3S. 72.
1200 13.S 28.0 S7. 90.
2-2lb 1200 14.S 26.S 62. 89.
2-22a 80 32.S 76.3 33. 72.
1200 14.8 29 .o S3. 92.
2-22b 1200 lS.6 29.0 SS. 91.
2-23a 80 29.S 73.4 3S. 69.
1200 14. 3 27.8 S4. 92.

27
Table 111 - page 5

1000 psi Percent


Test
Code No. Temp. OF Yield Strength Tensile Strength [long. Red. Area

2-23b 1200 15.3 27.8 61. 91.


2-24 80 28.0 70.3 38. 78.
1200 14.8 27 .(J 54. 84.
2-25 80 25.0 67.1 37. 73.
1200 12.0 25.S 58. 92.
2-27 80 39.0 65.4 36. 69.
300 35.0 58.2 33. 70.
500 32.0 62.9 29. 68.
700 29.0 59.1 42. 75.
800 26.S 48.3 43. 80.
900 24.0 40.9 48. 81.
1000 19.5 31.4 57. 82.
1100 16.5 23.3 61. 83.
2-28 80 28.9 69.0 36. 72.
300 25.S 60.0 34. 74.
500 26.6 57.7 31. 71.
700 26.7 54.1 27. 67.
800 22.0 53.4 27. 67.
900 22.5 47.1 32. 73.
1000 21.4 40.0 43. 81.
1100 17.9 33.3 54. 85.
2-29 80 31.5 69.1 33. 77.
300 24.0 58.7 31. 76.
500 23.7 56. l 29. 76.
700 23.5 55.S 27. 73.
800 24.(1 54.6 26. 71.
900 23.3 49.8 33. 73.
1000 21.5 40.S 37. 83.
1100 18.0 30.0 53. 87.
2-30 80 30.0 72.2 33. 73.
300 28.0 62.7 31. 74.
500 27.0 60.l 28. 73.
700 25.5 59.3 25. 71.
800 24.7 57.4 22. 63.
900 25.0 s 1. 3 35. 73.
1000 21.8 41. 7 52. 79.
1100 20.0 37.4 60. 88.
W2-3la 70 101.0 128.3 18. 56.
800 85.S 116.S 16. 56.
900 83.2 101. 7 18. 60.
1000 80.8 90.4 16.S 61.
1100 45.5 57.S 19. 85.
W2-3lb 70 76.0 90.S 24. 72.
800 62.5 71. 7 19.S 70.
900 57.5 63.2 23. 76.
1000 so.a 54.S 26. 82.
1100 43.5 46.0 30. 88.

28
Table III - page 6

1000 psi Percent


Test
Code No. Temp. op Yield Strength Tensile Strength Elong. Red. J\rea

Part 3 - s Cr - ~ Mo-Si steels

3-1 75 68.6 97.3 25. 59.


300 59.9 86.3 26. 63.
550 59.3 83.8 23. 59.
800 58.0 75.9 19.S so.
1000 44.7 58.1 27. 66.
1200 19.S
3-2 75 45.0 82.0 38. 76.
1000 25.S 45.S 42. 83.
1100 20.0 33.S 58. 90.
1200 15. 0 24.0 70. 93.
1300 10.0 15.0 79. 95.
1400 s.s 10.0 100. 97.
1500 4.0 7.0 105. 98.
3-3 70 45.0 85 .0 39. 76.
300 44 .s 74.0 33. 79.
500 36.0 72.0 31. 78.
700 36 .s 69.S 29. 78.
900 31.0 59.S 33. 72.
1100 20.0 33.S 52. 90.
1300 10.0 14.4 78. 96.
1500 4.0 7.0 95. 98.
3-5 75 52.4 83.6 37. 75.
800 65.1 30. 70.
900 60.7 33. 72.
1000 47.6 41. 71.
1100 37 .0 49. 90.
1200 24.6 57. 95.
1300 13.S 74. 98.
3-6 75 42.S 80.4 38. 74.
750 29.S 64.9 34. 72.
850 27.1 56.6 38. 75.
950 25 .0 50.6 46. 81.
1050 19.2 39.2 51. 87.
1200 12.0 23.1 78. 94.
3-7 70 112.4 132.S 13.S 28.S
3-8a 70 82.S
3-8b 70 108.6 120.S 15.0 46.
3-10 80 51.S 84.6 36. 74.

Part 4 - S Cr - ~ Mo-Ti steels


4-1 75 28.0 65.0 42. 81.
1000 17.3 42.0 40, 84.
llOO 15 .0 31. 7 38. 87.
1200 11. 0 23.3 64. 91.
1300 9.0 15.3 78. 94.

29
Table III - page 7

1000 psi Percent


Test
Code No. Temp. OF Yie l<l Strength Tensile Strength Elong. Red. Area

4-3 70 30.0 64.S 46. 80.


700 21.S 63.S 30. 78.
900 19.S 51.S 31. 80.
1100 15.S 35.0 39. 87.
1300 9.5 18.0 54. 95.
4-4 75 65.3 43. 64.
1000 40.S 38. 85.
1100 33.1 40. 86.
1200 24.1 45. 90.
1300 14.S 63. 96.
1400 9.2 70. 98.
1500 6.5 70. 99.
4-Sa 1000 36.7 46. 86.
1200 21. 7 54. 93.
4-Sb 75 31.8 60.3 41. 85.
1000 36 .s 40. 84.
1200 23.9 51. 91.
4-6a 1000 35.8 43. 87.
1200 21.0 57. 94.
4-6b 1000 36.S 36. 87.
1200 23.1 56. 94.
4-7a 1000 38.4 48. 87.
1200 21.S 62. 95.
4-7b 1000 37.0 39. 88.
1200 24 .6 so. 94.
4-9a 1200 23.3 64. 90.
4-9b 1000 50.7 29. 79.
1200 30.7 49. 87.
4-12 80 26.2 66.6 39. 80.
750 21.1 51.8 30. 76.
900 19.6 48.4 28. 76.
1000 17. 3 44.S 28. 73.
1100 15.4 34.4 38. 87.
1200 11. 3 25.8 46. 91.
1300 9.5 19.1 65. 94.
1400 7.2 13.3 65. 96.
1500 4.0 12.0 22. 63.
4-13 75 30.7 66.0 40. 80.

Part S - 7 Cr - 1i Mo steels

5-1 75 56.S 88.2 32. 71.


1000 37.S 52.6 36. 80.
1100 29.7 40.2 42. 86.
1200 20.0 29.2 49. 91.
1300 11. 0 21.8 57. 93.
1400 5.8 14.l 62. 96.
1500 3.5 10.0 67. 96.

30
Table III - page 8

1000~ Percent
Test ----
Code No. TemE· OF Yield Strength Tensile Strength Elong. Red. Area

5-2 70 80.0
300 77.5
500 73.0
700 65.0
900 52.5
1100 32.5
1300 15.5
5-3 75 42.9 76.4 37. 74.
800 54 .o
900 44.7
1000 33.1
1100 27.7
1200 17. 3
1300 10.9
5-4 80 83.5 36. 77.
\\'5-8a 70 105.0 139.5 10.5 24.
1100 50.8 58.9 21. 80.
W5-8b 70 84. 7 97.1 25. 70.
1100 44.7 47.2 25. 86.

Part 6 - 9 Cr - 1 Mo steel

6-1 75 60.4 93.6 31. 70.


1000 40.2 56.0 35. 79.
1100 32.6 44.0 41. 85.
1200 22.1 32.4 49. 90.
1300 10.3 23.0 54. 94.
1400 6.0 15. 7 65. 96.
1500 3.4 10.4 86. 97.
6-2 70 45.0 82.0 35. 72.
300 39.5 76.0 33. 71.
500 37.5 70.S 31. 69.
700 36.0 65.5 31. 68.
900 34 .5 59.0 35. 74.
1100 27.5 41.5 45. 86.
1300 10.5 18. 5 62. 94.
1500 3.5 10.5 88. 98.
6-3 75 31. 2 75.0 31. 66.
300 26. 2 66.5 28. 66.
500 24. 7 62.0 25. 65.
800 23.0 55.5 24. 62.
1000 21.4 47 .5 35. 74.
1200 15.5 211.5 64. 92.
1400 6.8 11. 9 94. 98.
6-4 75 35.2 76.8 38. 79.
900 21. 3 52.8 33. 77.
1000 18. 1 44.8 40. 84.

31
Table III - page 9

1000 psi Percent


Test
Code No. Temp. OF Yield Strength Tensile Strength Elong. Red. /\rea

6-4 1100 16.8 3S .8 SS. 89.


(cont.) 1200 13.3 23.0 7S. 9S.
1300 10.9 16.0 86. 97.
6-S 7S S3.l 82.0 36. 7S.
6-6 70 36.S 70.0 40. 78.
6-7 70 38.S 74.8 36.
6-18 7S 3S.2 76.3 34. 62.
6-19 7S 43.4 69.9 S7.
6-20 7S 4S.O 68.3 60.
6-66 7S S2. 7 71. 2 27. 82.
200 48.8 6S.6 24. 78.
400 44.S 59.4 2(). 81.
600 43.6 S6.2 22. 76.
800 39.3 Sl.S 19. 74.
1000 32.7 41. 8 l~. 82.
1100 20.6 31.9 31. 88.
6-67 7S S4.3 71.6 26. 78.
1100 22.3 32.9 34. 88.
W6-68a 70 96.4 129.9 3.0 8.2
800 9S.S 124.7 8.S 17.7
900 9S.S 116 .s 13.S 29.
1000 79.0 82.7 lS.S S8.
1100 S7 .s S7.S 26. 81.
W6-68b 70 7S.S 96.0 27. 70.
800 S8.S 7S.O 20. S4.
900 S7.S 68.2 22. 71.
1000 S2 .s S7.7 2S. 83.
1100 40.0 42 .s 35. 91.
6-69 7S 43.4 78. 9 38. 7S.
6-70 7S 47.8 83.0 36. 7S.
6-71 7S 49.4 83.2 35. 77.
6-72 7S 49.3 83.4 37. 77.
6-73 7S 47.2 83.0 36. 77.

32
Table IV

Creep and Rupture Data

Test At RuEture
Stress- Duration- Min. Creep
Code No. Temp. OF ksi Hours * Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

Part 1 - 3 Cr - 1 Mo steels

1-1 850 47.0 119. .0691 37.


25.0 2592. c .000013
20.0 3840. c .000002
950 45.0 3.5 38.
40.0 27. 37.
30.0 435. 37.
15.0 2332. c .000191
10.0 2194. c .000008
10.0 3432. c .000004
1000 25.0 207. .0257 68.
25.0 257. 62.
20.0 531. 53.
18.0 1184. 52 .
10.0 2976. c . 000088
7.5 1344. c .000026
1-2 900 28.0 8200. c .000298
22.0 3600. c .00050
17.0 11200. c .0000266
12.0 11500. c .0000166
1000 15.0 1420. c .00140
10.0 2900. c .000043
5.5 2900. c .000006
1100 7.85 2500. c .000065
4.6 2900. c .000009
3.0 2600. c .0000065
1200 3.0 4670. c .000051
1.0 1360. c .00002
1-3 900 50.0 0.6 40.
45.0 12.6 40.
40.0 142. so.
38.0 293. 64.
35.0 858. 54.
1050 30.0 4.6 89.
25.0 19.9 63.
20.0 115. 94.
17.0 407. 87.
15.0 1127. 90.
1200 18.0 3.3 95.
15.0 8.7 50.
10.0 151. 65.

* Tests designated c were terminated before rupture.


** Elongation in 2 inches unless noted otherwise.

33
Table IV - page 2

Test
At Rupture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. TemE· OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

1-3 s.s 3S6. 47.


cont. 7.0 13S3. 60.
1-4 1000 lS .0 1200. c .0012
10.0 3100. c .000102
1-S 1000 2s.o 433. SS.
19.S 2S6S. . OOS7 61.
17.S 3314. SS.
lS.S 4S42. 3S.
12.S lS ,S2S. so.
1100 17.9 29. S4.
lS. 0 6S. 76.
10.0 1001. .0236S 102.
s.o 40Sl. . OOS9 37 .
7.0 16,SS3. . 00062 43 .
1200 10.0 107. S6.
7.S 473. 88.
6.0 1694. S3.
s.o 3602. SS.
4.4 6S44. 39.
1-6 lOSO 26.0 4S.S 77. 82.
19.0 401. 66. S2.
13.0 3S42. SS. so.
1100 22.0 2S. 6S. S4.
lS .o 2S4. 71. S6.
9.0 Sl46. 7S. SS.
l-7a 900 so.o 138. . 0161 27. (l") 76 .
47.S 171. . 006S4 34. ( l ") 74 .
4S.O 44S. . OOS73 37 . (l ") 7S.
1000 3S.O 102. .0429 49. ( l ") Sl.
31. 0 440. .01S8 41. (l ") so.
24.S 19S2. .00326 S3. (l ") Sl.
1100 2s.o 32.S . 2SS S9 . (l ") so.
20.0 26S. .0299 S2. ( l ") S4.
lS.O 1136. .004S4 4S. (l ") so.
l-7c sso 90.0 so. .12Sl 23. ( l ") 6S.
SS .0 114. . 036 24. ( l ") 67 .
so.o 364. . 00930 22. (l ") 70 .
76.0 1S96. 23. (l") 6S.
900 ss.o 20.6 . 220 24 . (l") 66.
so.o 27. .100 lS.S ( l ") 66 •
7S.O 230. . OOS2S 24. (l ") 66.
70.0 430. .0044 lS.S (l") 67.
6S.O 4S4. . OOS2S 24. ( l ") 73.
66.0 6SS. .0039 26. ( l '') 73.
9SO 77.S 1.1 3. S2 23. ( l ") 73.
6S.O 40.S .106 23. (l") 74.
60.0 117. .0433 2S. ( l ") 73.
S7.S 476. .0104 26. ( l ") 70.

34
Table IV - page 3

Test
Stress- Min. Creep At Rupture
Duration
Code No. TemE. OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

l-7c 9SO ss.o 597. .0079S 23. ( 1 ") 68.


cont. S3.0 1371. .00216 21. ( l ") SS.
1000 60.0 22.7 . 231 28 . ( 1") 74.
ss.o 74. 31. ( 1 ") 77.
S2.S 210. .00874 26. (l ") 67.
so. 0 316. .0133 18. ( 1") SL
47.S 412. .00734 16. (l ") 44.
4S.O 794. .OOS96 18. ( 1 ") 32.
43.0 1390. .00174 16. ( l ") 31.
llOO 47.S 9.7 3S. ( l ") 77.
4S.O S9. .08S6 26. ( 1") 26.
40.0 40. .1219 31. ( 1") 49.
3S.O 108. .0402 19. ( 1 ") 33.
32.S 77. .0480 37. ( 1 ") 72.
30.0 243. .0196 22. ( l ") 32.
27.S 271. .0139
l-7d BSO S7.0 19.2 .420 29. ( 1") 7S.
S6.0 38. .390 33. ( 1") 7S.
ss.o 28. .28S 3S. ( l ") 76.
S2.0 138. .OS82 39. ( 1") 77.
so.o 30S. .0213 29. (l ") 7S.
48.0 938. .0044 33. ( 1 ") 77.
4S.O 1390. .0022S
900 ss.o 6.1 1.09 29. ( l ") 72.
so. 0 43. . 2S9 32. ( 1") 76.
4S.O 181. .0234 39. ( 1") 78.
4S.O 188. .0183 34. (l ") 78.
43.0 3SB. .00463 38 • ( 1") 78.
41.0 636. . 00924 37. (l ") 78.
40.0 619. .OllS 42. ( 1") 81.
38.0 871. . 0062 32. ( 1") 78 .
36.0 187S. .0023 40. ( l ") 82.
9SO so.o 2.6 23. ( 1") 76.
47.S 6.4 . 2S 2S. ( l ") 77.
4S.O 18.8 .299 32. ( 1") 78.
40.0 87. .0648 36. ( 1 ") 79.
3S.O 334. .0149 48. (l ") 82.
32.S 392. .0137 46. ( l ") 83.
1000 4S.O 2.4 2.3S 39. ( l ") 79.
40.0 16. 7 .338 42. ( l ") BO.
32.S 103. .0633 49. ( 1") 81.
30.0 200. .02SO 34. ( 1") 78.
27.S 493. .0114 Sl. ( 1 ") BS.
2S.O 828. .0089S 46. ( 1 ") 86.
1100 40.0 0.4S .294 44. ( 1 ") BS.
2s.o S3. .12 Sl. (l ") 88.
22.S 68. .136 S2. ( 1") 87.
20.0 218. .037S S6. ( 1") 88.
lS.O 999. .OOS02 49. ( 1") 86.

35
Table IV - page 4

Test
At Rupture
Stress- L>uration Min. Creep
Code No. TemE· OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

I-Ba 900 90.0 4.9 1.27 24. (I") 69.


80.0 63. .OS41 23. (1 ") 72.
77.S 78. .0426 2S. (I") 70.
7S.O 116. .0293 23. (I") 70.
72.S 269. .0489 26. (I") 70.
60.0 3S72. .000793 19. (I") 49.
1000 75.0 l.S 2.40 28. (I") 74.
70.0 S.7 .872 29. (I") 61.
6S.O 10.8 .4S3 39. (I") 7S.
60.0 31. .1673 27. (I") 72.
S2.S 243. .0147 17.7 (I") 38.
so.o 1166. .00213 10.0 (I") 14.S
1100 so.o 9.2 .S22 29. (I") 71.
47.S 20.3 .217 26. (1 ") SI.
42.S 24 .I .167 18. (I") S4.
40.0 32. .14S 2S. ( l ") 46.
30.0 110. .169 19. (I") 38.
2S.O 360. . 0119 22. ( l ") 43.
I-Sb 900 7S.O 4.1 1.27 24. (I") 69.
67.S 11. 2 .402 26. (I") 67.
67 .s 14.4 .313 24. (I") 73.
60.0 113. .0110 27. (I") 70.
S7 .s 202. . 0171 31. (I") 76.
ss.o 334. .0116 32. (I") 7S.
1000 S7.S 3.6 I.SS 33. (I") 77.
ss.o S.7 1.12 32. (I") 77.
so.o 22. .263 31. (I") 71.
4S.O 78. .0948 33. (I") 78.
42.S 190. .0787 32. ( l ") 72.
1100 40.0 7.1 1.06 3S. (I") 80.
3S.O 38. .167 32. (l ") 70 .
32.S SS. . 120 34. (1 ") 7S.
30.0 73. • 0926 33. (l ") 70.
27 .s 237. 34. (I") 64.
22.S 446. .OIOS 4S. (1 ") 7S.
I-Be 900 4S.O 212. .OIS4 36. (I") 77.
40.0 66S. .00946 48. (I") 82.
3S.O 2864. .00238 44. (I") 81.
32.S 2321. .00286 4S. (I") 82.
30.0 9384. .000463 43. (I") 78.
1000 4S.O 3.7 I.84 4S. (I") 79.
3S. 61. .0982 41. (l ") 81.
27 .s Sl2. . 0183 4S. (I") 84.
22.S 218S. . OOS06 S4. (I") 83.
17.S 6961. .000442 47. (I'') 82.
1100 40.0 .s .964 47. (I") 84.
30.0 6.4 1.12 66. (1 ") 86.
2S. 0 37. .3S3 S8. (I") 86.

36
Table IV - page S

Test
Stress- Duration Min. Creep At Rupture
Code No. Temp. OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. ~o Elong. % Red. Area

l-8c llOO 20.0 143. .726 S9. ( l ") 87.


cont. 17.S 324. .22S 66. ( l ") 8S.
lS.O 1010. • 00937 64 • ( l ") 87.
Wl-10 8SO 8S.O 14. 13.0 63.
7S.O 464. .00260 10.0 64.
70.0 871. . 00148 12.0 68.
70.0 1379. .00060 11.0 66.
50.0 > 8032.
900 6S.O 498. • 0032S lS.O 66.
6S.O 377. .0037S 12.0 66.
60.0 1033. .00201 13.0 69.
60.0 1833. .00166 13.0 67.
ss.o 2S82. .00099 lS. 0 6S.
50.0 7S81. . 00044 11.0 SS.
45.0 > 8780.

Part 2 - 5 Cr - Y, Mo steels

2-3a 800 26.0 soo. c .00024


20.66 S70. c .000083
17.2 670. c .000027
14.77 640. c • OOOOll
1000 12.S soo. c .000720
10.0 620. c .ooooss
7.S S70. c .000014
s.o S2S. c .000000
1200 5.0 550. c .00081
4.0 S4S. c .000242
2.0 soo. c . 000060
1.2 S30. c .000018
2-3b 800 17 .s 1000. c .000022
900 20.0 1080. c .00074
17 .s 1140. c .000325
lS. 0 113S. c .000060
13.0 1112. c .000031
1000 12.S 1000. c .00072
10.0 1460. c .000078
9.0 1000. c .000040
7.S 1212. c .0000060
1100 8.0 1000. c .00030
6.0 1000. c .000106
s.o 1000. c .OOOOS4
4.0 lOSO. c .00002S
1200 4.0 1080. c . OOOS76
3.0 1000. c .0001S2
2.S 1000. c . 000062
2.0 1000. c .000020

37
Table IV - page 6

Test
Stress- Duration Min. Creep At RuEture
Code No. TemE· OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

2-4 900 20.0 1000. c .oooss


lS.O 1000. c .00002
1000 13.0 1000. c .00292
10.0 1000. c .0002S6
2-Sa 1100 7.S 360. c .00234
6.06 1400. c .00027S
s .1 lSOO. c .00010
1200 3.0 1200. c .000337
2 -Sb 1100 6.06 1300. c .000212
2-Sc 1100 6.06 300. c .00180
2-Sd 1100 6.06 1100. c .00042S
S.2S 1200. c .00023
4.8 1600. c .000066
1200 3.0 1200. c .00032S
2-Se 1100 6.06 1000. c .00041
2-Sf 1100 6.06 1200. c .000037
2-6a 1100 S.2S llSO. c .000440
2-6b 1100 S.2S 300. c < • 0017S
2-6c 1100 S.2S 144S. c .000370
4.7 llSO. c .00016S
4. 1 12SO. c .00008S
1200 3.0 1400. c .00035
2-6d 1100 5. 25 1150. c .000525
2-6e 1100 S.2S 700. c < • oooso
2-6f 1100 S.2S 1200. c .000022S
2-7 900 17.S 1000. c .000270
12.S 1000. c .000030
1000 8.0 1000. c .000020
1100 6.6 1000. c .00018
2-8 900 20.0 107S. c .00074
17.S 1140. c .00032S
15.0 1140. c . 000060
13.0 1120. c .000031
1000 38.0 .19 38. 83.
34.0 1.67 41. 82.
30.0 7.7 47. 84.
24.0 104. so. 89.
20.0 1603. 48. 87 .
12.5 1000. c . 00072
10.0 1460. c .000078
9.0 1010. c .000040
7.5 121S. c .0000090
1100 28.0 .33 39. 87.
24.0 l. 8 SS. 87.
20.0 7.2 SS. 88.
13. 0 310. S7. 87.
11. 0 14S2. 21. 28.
8.0 1020. c .0003

38
Table IV - page 7

Test
At Rupture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. TemE· OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

2-8 1100 6.0 1000. c . 000106


cont. s.o lOlS. c .OOOOS4
4.0 102S. c . 00002S
1200 20.0 . 3S 6S. 91.
16.0 2.0 66. 89.
14.0 S.2 S7. 86.
9.0 148. S3. 71.
8.0 387. 42. 83.
6.0 2711. 33 . 77.
4.0 1080. c . OOOS76
3.0 1040. c .0001S2
2.S 1020. c .000062
2.0 lOOS. c .000020
1300 11. 0 1. 7 69. 90.
9.0 6.6 66. 89.
7.0 S2. 61. 74.
6.0 86. 66. 78.
s.o 2S3. so. 72.
4.0 1120. 28. 34.
3.S 1228. 34. 48.
2.4 S394. 22.
lSOO s.o 3.3 31. 72.
3.8 9.9 4S. 71.
2.0 92. S3. 73.
l.S 162. 69. s 1.
1. 1 481. S9.
0.9 67S. S3.
0.7 890. Sl.
2-9 8SO 7S.O 3S. 2S.
70.0 1S9. .0197 26.
9SO ss.o 19.0 23.
so.a 181. . 0193 29 .
4S.O 479. .0081 3S.
4S.O 388. .0127 32.
2S. 0 201S. c .00022
20.0 184S. c .000118
lOSO 30.0 163. .0406 44.
30.0 133. .472 43.
2S .o 430. . 0126 39 .
2S. 0 667. . 0101 36 .
20.0 3SS7. .OOlS 30.
10.0 146S. c . 0002S7
s.o 24 lS. c .000043
1100 2S. 0 98. .OS8 40.
20.0 432. 31.
18.0 488. .0128 38.
16. 0 1739. .0027 20.

39
Table IV - page 8

Test
Min. Creep A.t Ru:Eture
Stress- Duration
Code No. TemE. OF ksi Hours Hate-%/hr. % Elon~. % Red. Area

2-9 1100 14.0 1719. .0027 29.


cont. s.o 201S. c .00017S
2-10 900 40.0 3.9 3.S8 so.
3S .0 34. .SS S4.
30.0 230. .048 S9.
26.0 2240. .0104 66.
lOSO 2S. 0 2.9 7.S4 71.
20.0 22. 1.12 97.
17.0 123.
15.0 197. .133 89.
12.0 1608. .0164 S2.
1200 lS.O 2.0 12.7 92.
10.0 38. .62 90.
7.0 332. .044 107.
s.s 1S77. .007S 86.
2-12 1000 40.0 l. 7 2.06 33.
30.0 31. .18 3S.
20.0 680. .0024 40.
lS.O lOSO. c .004S
8.0 2877. c . 00011
1200 20.0 1. 0 9.0 37.
15 .o S.3 1. 7 34.
10.0 44.6 . 24 42.
2.S 2469. c .00024
2-13 1000 30.0 123. .OS4 lS.
10.0 428. c < • 00018
1200 lS.O 18. .27 9.
10.0 188. .026 . 13.
3.5 311S. c .00022
2-14 1000 40.0 18.9 c .38
30.0 162. .OS3 21.
1200 lS.O 18. 3 .4S 18.
10.0 21S. .03S 20.
2-lS 1000 lS. 0 1680. c .00234
10.0 2180. c .00013S
2-16 1000 lS.O 1030. c .00130
10.0 302S. c .00028
7.0 3000. c .00009
2-18 1000 6.0 4752. c .000031
1100 30.0 6.4 l.S8 31.
1200 20.0 4.9 1.9 3S.
2-19 1000 20.0 248. .1028 Sl.
18.0 378. 7S.
lS.O 2224. . 01116 7S.
14.0 3768. .006S6 77.
13.0 4078. .OOS2S 71.
11. 0 13,80S. .0014 70.

40
Table IV - page 9

Test
At RuEture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. Temp. OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elon~. % Red. Area

2-19 1100 12.0 298. 80.


cont. 9.0 1885. 61.
7.5 5451. . 00172 52 •
6.7 11,555. . 0009 63 •
1200 7.0 315. . 046 54 .
6.5 622. .0151 39.
5.5 2378. .007 40.
5.0 3200. .005 43.
4.6 5598. .00303 45.
4.2 9920. . 00121 43 .
2-20 1000 25.0 18. 54.
22.0 43. 59.
18.0 289. 78.
12.0 4263. 70.
10.5 9120. 69.
1100 12. 153. 64.
8.0 1547. 76.
7.0 4026. 99.
6.0 94 71. 61.
1200 8.0 142. 12.5
6.5 305. 79.
4.6 2173. 58.
3.8 5234. 56.
3.0 17,816. 40 .
2-2la 1000 10.0 • 00435
9.0 .000120
7.5 • 000060
6.5 .000017
1200 20.0 0.32 59. 88.
16.0 3.~ 62. 84.
14.0 4.7 67. 83.
9.0 252. 49. 61.
9.0 151. 45. 65.
7.5 634. 38. 54.
6.5 1578. 41. 52.
6.0 2352. 45. 71.
3.0 1160. c .00083
2.5 1125. c .000048
2.0 1220. c .000091
1. 25 1220. c .000020
1. 25 1290. c .000058
.9 1290 . c . 000060
2-2lb 1200 15.0 6.2 58. 81.
10.0 121. 51. 74.
8.5 294. 65. 77.
6.5 1618. 45. 69.
1.5 1120. c .000080

41
Table IV - page 10

Test
Stress- Duration Min. Creep At Ru£ture
Code No. TemE· OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

2-2lb 1200 1.0 127S. c .000032


cont. .7 1370 . c .000012
2-22a 1000 10.0 .000098
9.0 . 00006S
8.S .000029
7.S .000024
1200 20.0 .76 6S. 92.
16. f) 4.4 67. 92.
14.S 6.9 72. 92.
9.0 384. S8. 83.
9.0 191. 60. 89.
8.0 641. SS. 83.
7.S 83S. S8. 82.
7.0 2184. 46. 77.
6.S 1466. S9. 83.
s.s 4880.
2.S .000174
1.8 .000106
l.6S .000107
l.6S .000040
1. 2S . 000072
1.20 .OOOOS8
1.00 .000018
2-22b 1200 17.S 2.2 61. 90.
11. 0 ISL SS. 8S.
9.0 449. S3. 84.
7.7S IOS4. 43. 78 •
2.S . 00006S
2.0 .000031
1.6 .000027
I. 2S .000013
2-23a 1200 22.0 .41 S7. 91.
18.0 3.S 62. 91.
16.0 7.8 S9. 91.
9.0 446. Sl. 83.
9.0 523. S4. 77.
7.S 1243. SS. 80.
7.0 1396. 43. 74.
6.S 118S. 60. 79.
6.S 2633. 37. 70 .
2.S . 000180
I. 8 . 000026
1.8 .000069
l.S .ooooso
I. 2 .000017
1.2 .000028

42
Table IV - page 11

Test
At RuEture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. Temp. OF ksi Hours Rate-~•/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

2-23b 1200 17.S 1. 9 S9. 90.


11. 0 114. S6. 86.
9.0 304. SS. 84.
7.S 903. 44. 7S •
3.S . 00021
2.S .000037
2.0 .000017
2-24 1200 20.0 0.72 62. 89.
16.0 3.2 S9. 86.
14.0 12.l 66. 84.
9.0 3SS. 40. S9.
7.S 1138. 32. SS.
6.S 2808. 27. so .
2.S . 000276
1.8 .000186
1.8 .OOOOlS
1. 2S .00002S
2-2S 1200 19.0 0.4S 6S. 91.
16.0 2.2 70. 92.
13.S 12.4 69. 91.
9.0 140. 79. 8S.
9.0 289. 64. 83.
7.S 4S4. 61. 82.
6.S 704. 86.
s.s 2273. 43. 70 .
3.S . 000138
2.S .00004S
2.S .00003S
2.0 .000022
2-26 1000 29.0 108. 49. 86.
2S.O S04. 43. 81.
1200 10.0 112. 37. 77.
8.0 486. 62. 78.
7.0 80S. 72. 78.
W2-32 1100 20.0 68. 3S.
16.0 214. 33.
12.0 724. 22.
1200 8.0 286. 18.
s.o 4069. 8.

Part 3 - S Cr - Yi Mo-Si steels

3-1 800 30.0 1344. c .000039


900 30.0 192. c .0047
9SO 10.0 1992. c .ooooso
1000 40.0 3. 2.6 46.
lOSO 10.0 720. c .001S3

43
Table IV - page 12

Test
J\t RuEture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. Te!!!E· OF ksi !lours Rate-%/hr. % Elon~. % Red. Area

3-1 1100 30.0 2. 3.54 50.


cont. 20.0 41. .316 58.
3.0 1032. c .000074
3.0 1512. c .000076
1200 20.0 0.7 60.
1300 10.0 7.1 3.48 52.
3.0 288. c .0045
3-2 1000 35.0 2.3 51.
30.0 11. 56.
20.0 315. 56.
17.5 930. 55. 86 .
10.0 . 00020
7.7 .000050
6.0 .000016
llOO 22.5 3.4 66.
20.0 13. 62.
15.0 llO. 64.
12.5 415. 62.
10.0 1044. 63. 85.
6.0 .00024
5.0 . 00012
4.0 .000052
3.0 .000018
1200 15.0 2.1 75.
12.0 12. 74.
8.0 230. 67.
6.0 927. 75. 91.
4.0 .00023
3.0 .00021
2.0 .000023
1300 9.0 3.0 79.
7.0 21. 65.
5.5 65. 69.
4.0 350. 75.
3.2 2987. 44. 80.
1.5 .00016
1. 2 .000042
1500 3.2 4.7 100.
2.7 16. 96.
1.8 125. 87.
1.25 710. 87.
1.0 2268. 74. 71.
3-4 1000 40.0 .25 71.6 51.
30.0 7.0 3.36 68.
20.0 192. . 13 87 .
15.0 1603. .016 93.

44
Table IV - page 13

Test
Duration Min. Creep At Rupture
Stress-
Code No. Temp. OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

1250 15.0 0.3 78.S 93.


10.0 3.3 6.7 104.
7.5 lS. s 1. 04 127.
5.0 162. .13 102.
3.0 1466. .017 92 .
2.0 2150. c . 0022S
0.8 3144. c .000030
1500 4.0 1. 0 13.S 120.
2.5 7.5 2.8 113.
1. s 48. .48 198 .
0. 75 743. . 021 90.
0. 45 3000. c . 00086
0.20 3100. c .000027
3-5 1000 12.0 23SO. c .00101
8.S 42SO. c .OOOOS7
5.0 42SO. c .000004
1100 7.5 42SO. c . 00117
4.5 4250. c .000046
2.5 4250. c .000009
1200 3.5 4250. c .00270
2.0 42SO. c .000073
1. 0 37SO. c .000015
3-6 8SO 20.0 3000. c .000036
15. 0 2800. c .000019
950 30.0 so. 62.
25. 0 260. 78 .
20.0 89. c . 015
10.0 3240. c .000057
8.0 2616. c .000012
3-7 1000 40.0 so. . 14 40.
30.0 S69. .009 31.
1200 20.0 16.6 .3 30.
15.0 110. .029 22.
3-8a 1200 20.0 4.9 .86 63.
3-8b 1000 40.0 11. 5 .50 39.
30.0 242. . 015 42.
1200 20.0 4.5 1. 2 47.
3-9 1000 18. 0 S76. .035 S4.
lS. 0 2013. .0099
12.0 10,806. .0016 88.
1100 10.0 573. .018 67.
8.0 2726. .OOS8 51.
6.6 10,499. .00092 42.
1200 7.0 112. .11 86.
s.s 800. .025 SS.
4.6 2785. .0046 44.
4.0 5776. .0025 46 .
3.5 9674. . 0010 33.

45
Table IV - page 14

Test
At Rupture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. TemE· OF ksi Hours Ratc-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

1300 3.5 349. .073 79.


3.0 796. .028 44.
2.2 2666. .012 84.
1.65 7491. .0064 123.
3-10 1000 12.5 1000. c .00046
10. 0 1000. c .000092
7.5 1000. c .000029
6.0 900. c . OOOOll
3-ll 1200 7.2 160.
6.6 425.
5.7 ll80.
4.8 2200.
4.3 2930.

Part 4 - 5 Cr - lz Mo-Ti steels

4-2 900 40.0 0.33 43. 42.


35. 0 12.5 1.45 49.
30.0 160. .058 56.
25.0 7630. .00034 37.
1050 25 .o 1. 25 17. 56.
20.0 15.5 1. 3 76.
15. 0 228. .056 64.
12.0 780. .013 74.
10.0 2052. . 00344 86.
1200 15.0 0.5 46. 92.
12.0 3.6 3.2 75.
10.0 8.3 92 .
7.0 74. . 46 ll2 .
4.0 3616. . 0036 37.
4-4 1000 10.3 2330. c . 000027
7.5 2330. c .0000069
5.0 4050. c .0000065
llOO 6.0 2330. c .000055
4.0 2330. c .000007
2.5 2330. c .0000062
1200 3.0 2330. c .000040
2.0 2330. c .000025
1. 0 2330. c .0000069
4-5a 1000 32.0 1.4 41.
29.0 3.0 33.
28.0 290. 29.
24.0 563. 33.
20.0 1200. 33.
1200 13.0 1. 9 67.
6.0 763. 65.
5.0 856. 70.
4.5 4072. 65.

46
Table IV - page IS

Test
At Rupture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. Temp. OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elons. % Red. Area

4-Sb 1000 31. 0 soo. 27.


27.S S29. 34.
24.0 806. 28.
1200 13.0 6.S 68.
7.0 382. 64.
6.0 494. 66.
s.o 6191. so.
4-6a 1000 31. 0 3.6 39.
27.S 2so. 32.
20.0 960. 32.
17.S 2423. 39.
1200 IS. 0 l.S S9.
6.S 3S3. 63.
4.8 1304. SI.
4-6h 1000 30.0 347. 2S.
27.S 36S. 28.
20.0 1326. 38.
1200 13.0 4.6 68.
7.0 337. 71.
s.s S74. 69.
4.S 2974. SS .
4-7a 1000 33.0 . IS 31.
29.0 226. 37.
24.0 S09. 39.
20.0 1S78. 3S.
1200 13.0 2.9 S9.
7.0 177. 73.
s.s 1612. SS.
4-7b 1000 27.S S99. 28.
2S. 0 127. 30.
22.S 11S7. 30.
20.0 1961. 33.
1200 IS.O 2.8 60.
7.0 19S. 73.
4.S 28S3. SS.
4-8a 1200 10.0 7S. 69.
7.0 1012. S2.
4-8b 1200 8.0 30S. 73.
7.0 63S. 82.
4-8c 1200 8.0 630. 2S.
4-9a 1000 30.0 200. 24.
28.0 610. 21.
26.0 7S2. 22.S
24.0 7S2. 20.
22.0 1144. 20.S
1200 17.0 1.0 S7.
13.0 4.6 S7.
7.0 147. 67.
s.o 1003. 27.

47
Table IV - page 16

Test
Stress- Duration Min. Creep At RuEture
Code No. Te!!!£· OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

4-9b 1000 47.0 0.1 2S.


4S.O 12.S 23.
39.0 1S4. 22.
3S.O 327. 32.
30.0 1012. 22.
1200 20.0 1.4 S3.
7.0 184. 62.
s.s 604. 4S.
4.2 1981. 37.
4-10 1000 lS.O 2016. c .000228
10.0 3000. c .000007
4-11 1000 lS.O 1S32. c .00043
12.0 3000. c .000232
10.0 2180. c .OOOOS4
4-12 1000 30.0 200.
24.0 730.
22.0 1144. 20.S 78 .
12.0 c . 0001
10.0 c .000047
9.0 c .000030
HOO 28 .o 1.2
23.0 S.7
lS.O 90.
12.0 290.
10.0 610.
8.S 1312. 4S. SS.
1200 8.0 70.
6.4 165.
s.o 800.
4.2S 2031. S6. 67 .
2.s . 0018
2.0 .00030
l.S .000083
1.0 .000024
1300 10.0 . 82
6.0 16.
3.8 190.
3.0 710.
2.S 1714. 40 .
4-13 1000 8.96 1000. c . 00004

Part S - 7 Cr - % Mo steels

S-1 1100 33.0 0.2S 44. 8S.


26.0 3.2 48. 86.
23.0 8.0 48. 86.
lS.O S20. 47. 84.

48
Table IV - page 17

Test
At Rupture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. Te~. OF ksi Hours Rate-\/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

S-1 1100 13.S l l 7S. 44. 84.


cont. s.o > 1000. c .00022
4.0 >1000. c .00011
3.0 >1000. c .000042
2.0 > 1000. c .000018
1200 22.0 0.28 46. 89.
18.0 2.3 SS. 87.
16.0 4.9 4S. 87.
10.0 120. S4. 78 ..
7.0 1103. 44. 78.
3.0 >1000. c .00024
2.4 >1000. c .00010
2.0 > 1000. c .000063
1.2 >1000. c .000022
1300 lS.O 0.33 53. 93.
13.0 1.4 SB. 93.
9.8 6.2 60. 92.
s.s 188. S3. 89.
3.7 1200. S6. 89.
2.0 > 1000. c .00027
LS >1000. c .00012
1.0 >1000. c .000063
0.7S >1000. c .000038
lSOO 7.S 0.17 BS. 98.
S.2 1.3 BO. 98.
3.S 8.4 lOS. 96.
1. 8 140. ISO. 100.
1.1 720. 88. 98.
S-3 900 27.0 . 082
21. 0 .0010
14 .o .000074
1000 9.7 .00034
7.2 .000026
3.8 .000003S
1100 7.S .006S
4.S .000078
2.S .000013
1200 3. 1 .0060
2.0 .0010
1.0 .0000033
S-4 900 so.o 0.7 40.
4S.O 6.3 42.
42.0 16 .1 SS.
38.0 67. 38.
32.0 sso. S4.
30.0 836. 61.

49
Table IV - page 18

Test
~ture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. TemE· OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

S-4 lOSO 3S .o 0.3 so.


cont. 28.0 S.l SS.
22.0 32. 73.
17.S 2S3. 7S.
14.0 16SO. 81.
1200 20.0 0.4 70.
IS .0 4.2 64.
11. 0 22.8 62.
8.4 160. 6S.
6.4 710. 81.
s-s 1000 2S.O 23. S8.
22.0 89. 72.
18.0 330. 7S.
14.0 2000. 77.
10. 0 19,842. 61.
1100 12.0 74. 77.
9.0 832. 82.
7.0 349S. 72.
S.7 7874. S2.
S.4 14 ,S48. S9.
1200 7.0 212. 62.
6.0 327. 73.
s.o 1246. S9.
4.0 9166. 46.
S-6 1000 22.0 118. S4.
17.0 3S9. Sl.
14.S 1178. .018 6S.
14.0 2114. .0082 64.
12.0 S202. .0036 60 .
10.0 . 0013
1100 12.0 190. 76.
10.0 467. 79.
8.0 2996. 81.
7.0 6834. 71.
3.0 > 9999. .000043
2.0 .0000070
1200 6.S 331. .044 S4.
6.0 661. .020 49.
S.7 1130. .013 S2.
4.3 6186. .0021 S4.
3.7 .OOOS2
1300 3.S 647. .021 6S.
3.0 1S86. .0046 63.
2.S 4913. .0011 S7.
2.2 6900. .0006S 66.
S-7 1200 10.0 26. 4S. 93.
8.0 117. 42. 92.
7.0 448. 39. 90.

50
Table IV - page 19

Test
Stress- Duration Min. Creep At RuEture
Code No. TemE· OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

5-7 1200 6.0 800. 39. 90.


cont. s.o 3106. 35. 82.
1300 7.0 14. 45. 94.
6.0 41. 46. 95.
s.o 122. so. 96.
4.0 450. 40. 75.
3.5 777. 40. 62.
3.0 1525. 31. 56.

Part 6 - 9 Cr - 1 Mo steels

6-1 1100 36.0 . 47 40.


32.5 1.5 43.
28 .o 5.7 45.
16.0 2814. 31. 70.
6.0 7800. c .000013
4.5 5000. c . 0000041
1200 19. 5 2.4 53.
17.0 7.0 49.
10.0 360. 47.
8.4 1077. 43. 80.
6.0 .00009
s.o 1080. c . 000064
4.0 1040. c .000040
3.0 . 000021
1300 12.5 2.0 56.
10.5 s.2 56.
5.4 170. 58.
4.0 820. 60.
3.4 2503. 52. 83.
3.0 .00013
2.0 1050. c . 000054
1. 25 .000022
1. 0 1050. c .000013
1500 5. 1 1.3 80.
3.5 8.4 105.
1.8 140. 150.
1.1 710. 88.
6-3 1100 30.0 .82 24. 59.
25.0 4.8 4.2 67.
20.0 22. 1.0 78.
15.0 154. . 124 85 .
10.0 2542. 87 .
6.0 3000. c . 000153
4.0 3000. c . 000020

51
Table IV - page 20

Test
At nu12ture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. Te!!!E· OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

6-3 1300 lS .o .17 73.


cont. 10.0 2.6 9.2 114.
7.0 23. . 62 89 .
S.3 100. . 096 72 .
3.0 6080. . 001 36 •
2.S 3000. c .00023
l.S 3000. c .000018
6-4 800 3S.O 1000. c .000121
900 30.0 82S. c .00046
1000 10.0 1270. c . 000096
7.7 1S4S. c .ooooss
1100 6.S 1240. c . 0007S
4.S 13SO. c .000024
1200 3.3 840. c . 0007S
2.0 1010. c .000038
6-S 900 S7.9 0.1 33. 78.
so.o 12.8 41. 83.
47 .0 3S. 42. 81.
4S.O 128. 40. 82.
42.0 206S. 30. 82.
·lOSO 40.0 0.1 46. BS.
2S.O 23.9 74. 87.
22.0 S6. 73. 90.
20.0 121. SS. 91.
lS.O 2300. 4S. BS.
1200 16.0 2.9 76. 92.
13.9 7.6 7S. 82.
10.0 49. 81. 89.
6.8 399. BO. 87.
S.8 114S. 37. 78.
6-6 1100 11. 0 2S8S. 38.
10.0 4679. 40.
1200 6.S 1676. 40.
6.0 81Sl. 30.
6-7 1200 s.s 2SSS. 46.
s.o 41S2. 41.
6-8 9SO 24.0 3312. c .000037
18.0 3260. c .00003
12.0 3480. c .ooooos
6.0 3S04. c .000001
6-9 1100 6.0 2300. c . 00034S
4.0 3000. c .000022
6-11 1100 23.0 9.0 70.
19.0 19. 73.
16.0 96. 73.
12.0 671. 67.
9.0 S271. 92.
9.0 3000. c .00188
4.3 797S. c . 000011

52
Table IV - page 21

Test
At Rupture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. Temp. OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

6-12 1100 lS.O S9. 74.


11. 0 62S. 96.
9.0 241S. 73.
6-13 1100 16. 0 30. 61.
12.0 173. 66.
9.0 1901. 90.
6-14 1100 lS.O 71. 82.
11. 0 988. 70.
9.0 2918. 72.
6-lS 1100 16.0 33. 71.
12.0 2S8. 83.
9.0 1300. 74.
6-16 1000 2S.0 S30. 43.
22.0 1SS8. 46.
19.0 3616. S7.
17.0 7101. 60.
lS.S 16 ,001. S6.
1100 lS.O 186. . 038 72 .
12.0 960. . 024 82.
9.S S87S. .0024 72.
8.0 16,017. so.
1200 9.0 119. 67.
7.0 S67. 41.
6.0 2410. 42.
s.o 4337. 44.
4.4 12,302. 43.
1300 s.o 116. 104.
4.0 284. .043 106.
3.0 8S6. .0094 lOS.
2.0 32SO. .0026 102.
6-17 1000 2S.O 4S7. .0343 43.
22.S 917. .OlSl so.
20.0 321S. .00336 34.
17.0 19,4S3. .0008 31.
1100 lS.O 3S2. .OS46 49.
13.S 928. . 01716 39.
12.0 3136. . 00437 4S.
10.S 8947. .0012S 3S .
9.S 15 ,311. . 00034 S3.
7.0 16,262. c .00003
s.o 16,474. c .00001
1200 9.0 124. 84.
9.0 2SS. .074 77.
8.0 2SS. .0461 37 .
7.0 800. . 0178 42.
6.0 1696. .0122S S3.
S.6 270S. .0041 27.
s.o 8232. .OOOS9 23.

53
Table IV - page 22

Test
Duration At Ru;Eture
Stress- Min. Creep
Code No. Temp. OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

6-17 1200 4.0 14,833. c .00022


cont. 3.0 8660. c .0000408
2.0 c .000006S
1300 4.0 s 10. .036
3.0 20SO. .0067
2. 1 793S. .OOOS2 4S.
6-18 1100 22.0 7.3 71.
16. 0 91. 60.
13.0 891. 93.
4.3 6610. c .000006
6-19 llOO 22.0 4. SS.
16.0 43. 74.
11. 0 3S9. 73.
6-20 llOO 22.0 3. 67.
16.0 21. S4.
11. 0 370. 86.
6-21 900 3S.O .0012
30.0 .00044
1000 10.0 .000088
8.0 .OOOOS2
1100 6.2 .00018
4.4 .000024
1200 3.2 .00018
2.0 .000041
6-22 900 2S .o .OOOOOS8
2S .o . 00017
1000 lS. 0 .0027
lS.O .00019
9.0 .00004S
9.0 .000013
llOO 7.S .00012
7.2 .00010
4.8 .000046
4.8 .OOOOlS
6-23 llOO 12.0 294.
11. 0 SS2.
6-24 llOO 12.0 393.
11.0 6S2.
6-25 1100 12.0 S42.
11.0 1038.
6-26 llOO 12.0 S92.
11. 0 1087.
6-27 llOO 12.0 274.
11. 0 Sll.
6-28 llOO 12.0 426.
11.0 644.
6-29 llOO 12.0 287.
11. 0 497.

54
. Table IV - page 23

Test
At Rupture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. Te!J2· OF ksi Hours Rate-%/hr. % Elons. % Red. Area

6-30 1100 12.0 340.


11.0 606.
6-31 1100 12.0 446.
11.0 1009.
6-32 1100 12.0 515.
11.0 793.
6-33 1100 12.0 326.
11.0 502.
6-34 1100 12.0 422.
11.0 637.
6-35 1100 12.0 498.
11. 0 998.
6-36 1100 12.0 356.
11.0 728.
6-37 1100 12.0 311.
11.0 670.
6-38 1100 12.0 398.
6-39 1100 12.0 268.
11.0 556.
6-40 1100 12.0 454.
11.0 888.
6-41 1100 12.0 410.
11. 0 723.
6-42 1100 12.0 460.
11. 0 812.
6-43 1100 12.0 485.
11.0 835.
6-44 1100 12.0 271.
11.0 566.
6-45 1100 12.0 343.
11. 0 613.
6-46 1100 12.0 280.
11.0 484.
6-47 1100 12.0 361.
11.0 752.
6-48 1100 12.0 274.
11.0 568.
6-49 1100 12.0 273.
11.0 539.
6-50 1100 12.0 341.
11.0 725.
6-51 1100 12.0 347.
11.0 625.
6-52 1100 12.0 498.
11.0 663.
6-53 1100 12.0 272.
11.0 510.

55
Table IV - page 24

Test
At Rupture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. TemE· •p ksi Hours Rate-\/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

6-54 1100 12.0 393.


11.0 643.
6-55 1100 12.0 393.
11.0 790.
6-56 1100 12.0 386.
11.0 661.
6-57 1100 12.0 372.
11. 0 733.
6-58 1100 12.0 426.
11. 0 860.
6-59 1100 12.0 498.
11. 0 848.
6-60 1100 12. 0 398.
11.0 739.
6-61 1100 12.0 278.
11. 0 571.
6-62 1100 12.0 308.
11. 0 S33.
6-63 1100 12.0 407.
11.0 682.
6-64 llOO 12.0 300.
11. 0 74S.
6-6S 1100 20.0 30. 80. 90.
17.0 63. 63. 89.
lS. 0 237. 6S. 89.
12.0 969. 64. 77.
10.0 1726. SS. 82.
6-66 1100 20.0 S.7 41. 87.
lS.O 49. 46. 83.
12.0 331. 70. 86.
10.0 1088. 87. 87.
6-67 1100 20.0 S.7 86. 88.
lS.O 40. 106. 89.
14.0 93. 74. 87.
13.0 171. 96. 91.
12.0 269. 88. 88.
10.0 1279 63. 91.
8.0 6603. 83. 88.
1100* lS. 0 43. 67. 88.
12.0 2S4. S9. 84.
11. 0 833. 93. 7S.
10.0 6Sl. 40. 78.
8.0 SS19 62. 84.

* Full wall strip specimens

56
Table IV - page 25

Test
At RuEture
Stress- Duration Min. Creep
Code No. Te!!!!!· OF ksi Hours Rate-\/hr. % Elong. % Red. Area

6-69 1150 22.0 0.93


22.0 1.0
16.0 11.3
16. 0 12 .5
12.4 67.
12.4 79.
9.4 460.
9.4 515.
6-70 1150 22.0 1.4
22.0 1.5
16.0 15.8
16. 0 18.2
12.4 119.
12.4 115.
9.4 920.
9.4 1070.
6-71 1150 12.4 186.
12.4 175.
12.4 170.
12.4 181.
12.4 196.
12.4 180.
12.4 133.
12.4 161.
12.4 212.
12.4 182.
6-72 1150 12.4 190.
12.4 200.
12.4 200.
12.4 209.
12.4 181.
12.4 167.
12.4 204.
12.4 206.
12.4 171.
12.4 173.
6-73 1150 12. 4 230.
12.4 262.
12.4 241.
12.4 233.
12.4 198.
12.4 230.
12.4 221.
12.4 215.
12.4 226.
12.4 244.

57
Table Va

Ratio of Elevated Temperature Yield Strength to


Strength at Room Temperature

TemE· OF 3 Cr - l 1..10* 5 Cr - ':z Mo 5 Cr - !2 Mo-Si 5 Cr -% ~1o-Ti 7 Cr - ';; ~lo 9 Cr - l )'o

75 l. 0 1.0 l. () l. 0 l. 0 1.0

100 .980 .965 . 975 (. 960) (. 960) .965

200 . 925 .890 .928 (.840) (.875) .895

300 .864 .857 . 899 ' (. 790) (.835) . 856

400 .840 .860 .879 (.770) (. 800) .840

500 .834 .862 .870 (.768) (. 7 85) . 831

600 .834 .859 .838 (.765) (.775) .819

700 .832 .839 .802 .761 (.765) . 794

800 .824 .792 .739 . 742 (.745) . 751

900 .802 .719 .655 . 700 (. 710) .688

1000 . 758 .(,24 .553 .633 .664 .603

1100 .686 .516 .439 .543 .526 .500

1200 .578 .409 .321 .438 . 35 l .384

1300 .427 .322 .213 .330 .198 .265

1400 .226 .279 .128 .234 .1'12 .152

1500 . 085 . 171 .062 .062

* The quantity of <lata for 3 Cr - l ~-lo steel at temperatures hetween room-temperature and
800 Fis minimal, with consequent imprecision in the trend ratios.
( ) Approximate values for temperature ranges for which there were no test results.

58
Table Vb

Ratio of Elevated Temperature Tensile Strength to


Strength at Room Temperature

Te~. •F 3 Cr - 1 Mo* 5 Cr - ~ ~lo 5 Cr - ~ Mo-Si 5 Cr - !2 ~lo-Ti 7 Cr - ~ Mo 9 Cr - 1 Mo

75 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 l.O

100 .990 .975 .970 (. 985) .998 .980

200 .970 .905 .893 (.965) .985 .933

300 .956 .878 . 865 (. 960) .966 .890


'
400 .935 .870 . 867 (.955) .945 .859

500 .916 .868 . 870 (. 950) .916 .836

600 . 896 .854 .860 (. 935) . 870 .816

700 . 869 .828 . 833 .910 . 80.3 .789

800 .837 . 776 . 772 . 8.38 . 720 . 746

900 .778 .700 .682 .750 .621 .681

1000 .693 .603 .565 .635 .512 .591

1100 .583 .491 .430 .508 .399 .478

1200 .452 .374 .293 . 378 .291 . 351

1300 . 316 .266 .17.3 . 259 .199 .229

1400 .198 .185 . 095 .171 .137 .140

1500 .153 .088 .135 .120 .129

* The quantity of data for 3 Cr - 1 Mo steel at temperatures between room temperature and
800 Fis minimal, with a consequent imprecision in the trend ratios.
Approximate values for temperature range for which there were no test results.

59
Table VI

Summary of Rupture Strengths (ksi)

Individual lleats

Code No. 8SO 900 9SO 1000 lOSO 1100 llSO 1200

Part 1 - 3 Cr - 1 Mo steels

1000 hours

1-1 27.S 18.0


1-3 32.0 lS. 0 7.3
1-S 21. 2 9.9 6.4
1-6 lS.8 11. 8
l-7a 42.0 27. 0 lS. 1
l-7c 77.0 63.0 S3.0 44.0 21.0
l-7d 47 .s 38.S 30.0 24.S lS.O
l-8a 6S .o so.a 20.0
l-8b so.a 37.0 19.0
l-8c 38.0 2S .0 lS .0
Wl-10 70.0 60.0

10,000 hours

1-1 10.2
1-3 24 .0 11. 2 s.o
1-S 13.7 7.4 4.0
1-6 11.0 8.0
l-7a 19.S 9.S
l-7c 69.0 49.0 46.0 3S. 0
l-7d 43.0 30.0 18.S 9.8
l-8a ss.o 43.0
l-8b 41.0 31.S 12.0
l-8c 29.0 16.0 10.3
Wl-10 60.0 49.0

100,000 hours

1-5 8.8 5.6 2.S


1-6 7.6 S.4
l-7c 62.0 40. 0
l-7d 24.0
l-8a 46.0
l-8c 23.0 7.2
Wl-10 39.0

60
Table VI - page 2

Code No. 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1200 1300 1500

Part 2 - 5 Cr - ~ Mo steels

1000 hours

2-8 20.5 11. 2 6.8 3.8 0.7


2-9 64.0 41.0 23.0 16 .9
2-10 27.5 12. 9 5.9
2-12 19.0 5.6
2-13 7.4
2-14 23.0 7.7
2-19 16.5 9.7 6.0
2-20 14.9 8.8 5.3
2-2la 6.8
2-2lb 6.7
2-22a 7.3
2-22b 7.7
2-23a 7.8
2-23b 7.2
2-24 7.5
2-25 6.4
2-26 22.5 6.7
W2-32 11.0 6.3

10,000 hours

2-8 17.5 8.8 4.9 2.1


2-9 17.1 10.4
2-10 23.2 9.6 4.1
2-12 13.8
2-19 11. 7 6.8 4.3
2-20 10.2 5.9 3.3
2-2la 4.6
2-2lb 4.5
2-22a 5.0
2-22b 5.1
2-23a 4.7
2-23b 4.7
2-24 5.1
2-25 3.9
2-26 18.0 4.2
W2-32 6.6 4.2

100,000 hours

2-8 15.0 6.8 3.5 1.1


2-9 13.0 6.6
2-10 20.0 7.3 2.9
2-19 8.2 4.8 3.1
2-20 7.2 4.0 2.1
2-2la 3.1
2-2lb 3.0

61
Table VI - page 3

Code No. 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1200 1300 1500

2-22a 3.5
2-22b 3.3
2-23a 2.8
2-24 3.4
2-25 2.4
W2-32 2.8

Code No. 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1500

Part 3 - 5 Cr - Y, Mo-Si steels

1000 hours

3-2 17. 7 10.8 5.9 3.6 1. 2


3-4 15.8 3.3 0.68
3-6 21.5
3-7 28.0 10.5
3-8b 26.0
3-9 16.3 9.2 5.3 2.8
3-11 5.8

10,000 hours

3-2 13.3 7.5 3.6 2.5 0.76


3-4 11.5 1. 9 .37
3-8b 21. 0
3-9 12.0 6.6 3.5 1.5
3-11 3.1

100,000 hours

3-2 10.0 1. 7 0.50


3-4 8.5
3-9 9.0 4.9 2.1 0.8

Code No. 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1300

Part 4-5 Cr - ~ Mo-Ti steels

1000 hours

4-2 27 .5 11.2 4.8


4-5a 21.0 5.4
4-5b 22.5 6.1
4-6a 20.4 5.1

62
Table VI - page 4

Code No. 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1300

4-6b 21.5 5.4


4-7a 21. 7 5.8
4-7b 23.5 5.3
4-8a 7.0
4-8b 6.4
4-9a 23.0 5.0
4-9b 30.0 4.8
4-12 9.0 2.7

10,000 hours

4-2 24.0 7.5 3.4


4-5a 12.0 3.9
4-5b 4.4
4-6a 13.0
4-6b 11. l 3.6
4-7a 14.0 4.2
4-7b 12.9 3.5
4-8a 5.1
4-8b 4.1
4-9a 3.3
4-9b 20.2 2.9
4-12 5.4 1. 8

100 ,000 hours

4-2 21.5 4,8 2.4


4-5a 2.8
4-6a 8.1 3.0
4-6b 2.4
4-7a 9.0 2.9
4-7b 2.3
4-9b 1. 7
4-12 1.1

Code No. 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1200 1300 1500

Part 5 - 7 Cr - 12 Mo steels

1000 hours

5-1 14 .0 7.0 3.8 .98


5-4 30.0 14.8 5.9
5-5 15 .1 8.6 5.4
5-6 15.0 9.2 5.6 3.2
5-7 5.9 3.3

63
Table VI - page 5

Code No. 900 950 1000 1050 llOO 1200 1300 1500

10 1 000 hours

5-1 11. 0 5.0 2.3


5-4 24.0 11. 2 4.0
5-5 10.9 5.6 3.9
5-6 10.3 6.6 4.0 2.2
5-7 4.1 1.8

100,000 hours

5-4 8.7
5-5 7.8 3.7 2.8
5-6 7.4 4.8 2.9 1.4
5-7 2.8

Part 6 - 9 Cr - 1 Mo steels

1000 hours

6-1 17. 2 8.6 4.0 0.95


6-3 11. 3 3.9
6-5 42.0 16.1 5.9
6-6 12.5 6.6
6-7 6.4
6-11 11. 4
6-12 10. 1
6-13 9.6
6-14 10.9
6-15 9.6
6-16 23.0 11. 9 6.7 2.8
6-17 22.6 13.1 6.7 3.5
6-18 13.0
6-19 9.6
6-20 9.5
6-23 10. l
6-24 9.8
6-25 11. l
6-26 11. 2
6-27 10. 1
6-28 11. 0
6-29 9.8
6-30 10. 1
6-31 11. 0
6-32 10.4
6-33 9.4

64
Table VI - page 6

Code No. 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1300 1500

6-34 9.8
6-35 11.0
6-36 10.6
6 37 10.5
6-39 8.6
6-40 10.8
6-41 10.6
6-42 10.5
6-43 1\).4
6-44 10.1
6-45 IO.I
6-46 9.7
6-47 10.4
6-48 10. 1
6-49 IO. 0
6-50 10.6
6-51 10.2
6-52 9.5
6-53 IO. 2
6-54 10.1
6-55 10.3
6-56 10.3
6-57 10.4
6-58 10.8
6-59 10.7
6-60 IO. 3
6-61 10.1
6-62 9.9
6-63 10 .1
6-64 10.6
6-65 11. 2
6-66 10.0
6-67 10.2
6-69 9,0
6-70 9.3

10,000 hours

6-1 14. 0 6.2 2.6


6-3 S.l 2.7
6-5 39.5 12. 9 4.0
6-6 8.9 5.9
6-7 4.3
6-11 8.0
6-12 7.2
6-13 7.0
6-14 7.8
6-15 6.7
6-16 16.5 8.6 4.6 1.5

65
Table VI - page 7

Code No. 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1200 1300 1500

6-17 18.0 10.1 4.8 1.9


6-18 10.3
6-19 6.8
6-20 6.9
6-25 8.1
6-26 8.0
6-65 7.9
6-66 7.4
6-67 7.5

100,000 hours

6-1 11. 1 1. 7
6-3 5.8 1.9
6-5 36.0 10.0 2.7
6-11 5.7
6-12 5.1
6-13 5.1
6-16 11.9 6.2 3.1 n. 76
6-17 14. 1 7.6 3.4 1.0
6-66 5.5
6-67 s.s

66
Table VII

Summary of Creep Strengths {ksi)

Code No. 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1200

Part 1 - 3 Cr - 1 Mo steels

0.1\ Eer 1000 hours

1-1 28.5 14.0


1-2 19.3 11.4 8.0
1-4 9.7
1-5 5.8
l-7c 45.0 32.0
l-7d 41.0 30.0 8.8
l-8a 51.0 45.0
l-8c 23.0 14.0
Wl-10 62.0 41.0

0.01% 2er 1000 hours

1-1 24.0 10.7


1-2 12.3 6.7 4.0

Part 2 - 5 Cr - Y, Mo steels

0.1% Eer 1000 hours

2-3a 21. 5 10.5 2.6


2-3b 15.7 9.9 5.8 2.7
2-4 17.0 9.0
2-5a 5.0
2-5d 4.8
2-6c 4.2
2-7 15.0
2-9 20.0 7.0 3.8
2-12 7.7
2-13 2.9
2-15 9.6
2-16 7.4
2-19 7.5 4.5 3.0
2-2la 7.8 1. 7
2-2lb 1. 6
2-22a 9.8 1.95
2-22b 3.0
2-23a 3 .1
2-23b 3.05
2-24 1. 85
2-25 3.15

67
Table VII - page 2

Code No. 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1200

0.01% Eer 1000 hours

2-3a 14.0 6.8 0.9


2-3b 10. 0 7.5 3.0 1. 7
2-4 14.0
2-5a 2.7
2-5d 3.3
2-6c 2.8
2-7 10.4
2-9 13.0 2.8
2-15 6.9
2-16 4.0
2-2la 6.1 1. 0
2-2lb .65
2-22a 6.8 • 79
2-22b 1.1
2-23a .98
2-23b 1.65
2-24 .95
2-25 1.58

Code No. 850 900 950 1000 1100 1200 1250 1300 1500

Part 3 - 5 Cr - ~ Mo-Si steels

0.1% Eer 1000 hours

3-2 8.6 4.6 2.7 1.39 .28


3-4 1.02
3-5 9.0 5.3 2.2
3-9 8.1 4.7 2.5
3-10 10.0

0.01% Eer 1000 hours

3-2 5.4 2.5 1. 7 0.93 .14


3-4 0.63
3-5 6.1 2.55 . 78
3-10 5.8

68
Table VII - page 3

Code No. 8SO 900 9SO 1000 lOSO 1100 llSO 1200 1300

Part 4 - S Cr - %! r.t>-Ti steels

0.1% Eer 1000 hours

4-2 23.S S.8


4-10 13. 3
4-11 10.9
4-12 12.0 1. SS

0.01% Eer 1000 hours

4-4 7.0 3.4 1. 2


4-10 10.2
4-11 6.8
4-12 6.8 0.6S

Part 5 - 7 Cr - %! Mo steels

0.1% Eer 1000 hours

5-1 3.9 2.4 1.3


5-3 lS.O 8.S 4.6 1.S
5-6 3.S 2.4 1. 2

0.01% Eer 1000 hours

S-1 1.S 0.7 0. 26


S-3 8.S s.s 2.2 1.1
S-6 2.2

Part 6 - 9 Cr - 1 Mo steels

0.1% Eer 1000 hours

6-1 9.6 6.2 2.6


6-3 S.4 2 .1
6-4 10.0 6.8 2.4
6-8 26 .0
6-9 s.o
6-11 S.8
6-17 13.0 8.6 3.6 1.6
6-21 24.0 11. 0 S.6 2.6
6-22 10.8 7.2

69
Table VII - rage 4

Code No. 850 900 950 1000 1050 ] 100 1150 1200 1300
·----
0.01% ;eer 1000 hours

6-1 5.6 2. l 0. 85
6-3 3.4 l. 25
6-4 4.0 1.5
6-8 15.0
6-9 3.5
6-11 4.2
6-17 5.0 2.2
6-21 3.7 1.2
6-22 7.5 3.6

70
Table VIiia

Summary Comparison of Average 1000 Hour Rupture Strengths (ksi)

3 Cr - 1 Mo ( l) 5 Cr - lz Mo 5 Cr - !7 Mo-Si
Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter lndivid. Parameter

800 51. 0
850 49.5 44.0 32.1
900 37.5 36.8 29.8 27.0 26.5
950 28.5 29.0 23.0 22.2 22.8 22.0
1000 21.5 22.0 17.9 18.0 17.1 17.5
1050 16.3 16.3 14.0 14.2 12.8 13.5
1100 12.4 12.0 10.8 11.1 9.5 10.1
1150 9.3 8.9 8.4 8.6 7.1 7.4
1200 7.05 6.5 6.5 6.6 5.3 5.4
1250 4.8 5.1 4.9 4.0 4.0
1300 3.9 3.7 2.9 2.9

(1) Excluding quenched and tempered condition.

5 Cr - lz Mo-Ti 7Cr-lzMo 9 Cr - 1 Mo
Temp. OF lndivid. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 54.0 43.0


850 43.8 34.0 44.0
900 39.5 34.7 30.0 27.0 34.5 34.0
950 28.7 26.8 22.9 21.1 25. 9 26.0
1000 20.6 20.l 17.3 16.5 19.3 20.0
1050 15.0 14 .8 13.l 12.9 14.4 15.1
1100 10.8 10.8 10.0 9.9 10.7 11. 3
1150 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.7 8.0 8.7
1200 5.7 5.3 5.8 5.8 6.0 6.6
1250 4.1 3.6 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.9
1300 2.95 2.4 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.6

71
Table VIIIh

Summary Comparison of Average 10,000 Hour Rupture Strengths (ksi)

3 Cr - 1 Mo (1) 5 Cr - !;; Mo 5 Cr - !~ Mo-Si


Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter lndivid. Parameter

800 43.0 31.8


850 38.5 35.5 26 .3 26.0
900 28.4 27 .8 23.9 21.S 21. l
950 20.7 20.7 17.9 17.1 16.5
1000 15.4 15.1 13.5 13.5 12.4 12.5
1050 11.4 10.8 10.1 10.3 9.1 9.2
llOO 8.3 7.8 7.6 7., 6.6 6.7
ll50 6.2 5.7 5.7 5.9 4.8 4.8
1200 4.6 4.3 4.4 3.4 3.5
1250 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.6
1300 2.4 1.8 1.9

(1) Excluding quenched and tempered condition.

5Cr-~Mo-Ti 7 Cr - !-;; Mo 9 Cr - 1 no
Temp. OF lndivid. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 43.0 33.7 43.0


850 33.7 26 .1 34.0
900 24.4 25.5 22.1 20.3 33.0 26.0
950 17.7 19.0 16.6 15.7 23.5 19.9
1000 12.9 13. 7 12 .5 12.0 16.6 15.0
1050 9.4 9.8 9.4 9.2 11.9 11. 0
1100 6.9 6.8 7.0 7.0 8.5 8.3
1150 5.0 4.6 5.3 5.3 6 .1 6.2
1200 3.7 3 .1 3.9 4.0 4.3 4.6
1250 2.7 3.0 3.0 3. 1 3.4
1300 1.95 0 2.2 2.2

72
Table VIiie

Summary Comparison of Average 100,000 Hour Rupture Strengths (ksi)

3 Cr - 1 Mo (1) 5 Cr - !:; Mo 5 Cr - 1 Mo-Si


Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 35.0 26.0 25.8


850 27.0 21.1 20.7
900 22.0 19.7 19.0 16.6 16.0
950 15.2 14.2 13.8 12.8 12.0
1000 10.7 10. 2 10.1 9.7 8.5 8.6
1050 7.4 7.3 7.3 7.3 6.2 6.1
1100 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.4 4.6 4.4
1150 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.4 3.2
1200 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.3
1250 2.0 1. 8
1300 1.5 1.3

(1) Excluding quenched and tempered condition.

5 Cr - Yi Mo-Ti 7 Cr - !2 Mo 9 Cr - 1 ~

Temp. OF Individ. Parameter lndivid. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 33.0 25.9 35.9


850 24.8 19. 7 27.0
900 17 .6 18. 1 15 .1 31.5 20.1
950 12.5 13.0 11.5 21. 0 15.2
1000 9.0 9.1 8.2 8.7 14.1 11. l
1050 6.4 6.1 6.2 6.5 9.4 8.2
1100 4.6 4.1 4.7 4.9 6.3 6.1
1150 3.3 2.7 3.5 3.6 4.2 4.4
1200 2.35 2.7 2.7 2.8 3.2
1250 1.67 2.0 1.9
1300 1. 20 1.5 1.27

73
Table IXa

Summary Comparison of Minimum 1000 Hour Rupture Strengths (ksi)

3 Cr - 1 Mo (l) 5 Cr - 12 Mo 5 Cr - % Mo-Si
Te!'.E. •p Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 42.5
850 39.5 37.0 25.2
900 30.0 30.3 24. 0 21.1 20.8
950 22.5 23.8 18.7 17.5 17.7 17.2
1000 17.1 18.1 14.6 14.1 13 .1 13.6
1050 13.0 13.3 11. 3 11. i 9.8 10.5
1100 9.8 9.9 8.8 8.7 7.4 7.9
1150 7.4 7.3 6.8 6.8 5.5 5.8
1200 5.7 5.4 5.3 5.2 4.2 4.3
1250 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.1 3.1
1300 3.2 2.9 2.3 2.3

(1) Excluding quenched and tempered condition.

5 Cr -12 Mo-Ti 7 Cr - ~ \lo 9Cr-1Mo


Te!!!E· OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 38.5 35.0


850 31.4 28 .o 35.7
900 30.0 24.8 23.9 22.l 28.0 27.6
950 22.0 19.1 18.0 17.4 21.0 21.1
1000 15.8 14.3 13.6 13.5 15.8 16.2
1050 11. 4 10.5 10.4 10.5 11.8 12.3
1100 8.2 7.7 7.9 8.2 8.8 9.2
1150 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.3 6.6 7.1
1200 4.3 3.8 4.5 4.9 4.9 5.3
1250 3.1 2.6 3.5 3.7 3.7 4.0
1300 2.3 1. 75 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.9

74
Table IXb

Summary Comparison of Minimum 10,000 Hour Rupture Strengths (ksi)

3 Cr - 1 ~(l) 5 Cr - Y, Mo 5 Cr - Y, Mo-Si
Temp. •F Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter In<livid. Parameter

800 36.5 25.0


850 28.7 29.7 20.7 20.3
900 21.0 22.0 18.2 16.9 16.5
950 15.5 16.9 13.6 13.S 12.8
1000 11. 5 12.5 10. 2 10.5 8.5 9.7
1050 8.4 9.1 7.7 8.0 6.2 7.2
1100 6.2 6.6 5.8 6.2 4.5 5.2
1150 4.6 4.8 4.4 4.6 3.3 3.8
1200 3.4 3.3 3.4 2.4 2.8
1250 2.5 2.5 1. 7 2.0
1300 1.9 1. 25 1. 5

(1) Excluding quenched and tempered condition.

5 Cr -12 Mo-Ti 7 Cr - ~ ~lo 9 Cr - 1 Mo

Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 31.0 27 .6 35.0


850 24.0 21. 5 27.8
900 18.0 18.2 17.0 16.6 24 .o 21.1
950 13. 0 13.5 12 .6 12.8 17.0 16.0
1000 9.5 9.7 9.5 9.9 12.1 12.l
1050 6.9 6.9 7.1 7.6 8.7 9.1
1100 5.1 4.8 5.3 5.8 6.2 6.7
1150 3.7 3.3 4.0 4.4 4.4 5.0
1200 2.7 2.2 3.0 3.3 3.2 3.7
1250 1. 95 2.3 2.5 2.25 2.7
1300 1.45 1. 7 1.60

75
Table lXc

Sunanary Comparison of ~linimum 100 ,000 Hour Rupture Strengths (ksi)

3Cr-1Mo(l) S Cr - >2 \lo s Cr - '2 ~lo-Si

Temp. •p Individ. Parameter lndivid. Parameter lndivid. Parameter

800 29.2 20.3 20.2


8SO 22.3 16.S 16.2
900 18.0 16.S 13.3 13.0 12.S
9SO 12.6 11. 9 9.6 10.0 9.3
1000 8.8 8.S 7.0 7.7 s.s 6.7
IOSO 6.1 6.1 S.l S~7 4.0 4.8
1100 4.3 4.4 3.7 4.2 2.9 3.4
1150 3.0 2.7 3.0 2.2 2.5
1200 2.1 l.9S 2.2 1.6 I. 8S
12SO 1.4 I. 2
1300 I.OS .86

(1) Excluding quenched and tempered condition

S Cr-12 Mo-Ti 7 Cr - 12 "lo 9Cr-1Mo


Temp. •p lndivid. Parameter IndiviJ. Parameter lndivid. Parameter

800 23.8 21.1 29. I


8SO 17. 7 16.l 21.S
900 12.8 12.9 12.4 20.6 16.4
9SO 9.1 9.2 9.S 13.7 12 .6
1000 6.S 6.S 6.3 7.2 9.2 9.1
IOSO 4.6 4.4 4.7 S.4 6.2 6.7
1100 3.3 2.9 3.S 4.0 4.1 4.9
llSO 2.4 l.9S 2.7 3.0 2.8 3.6
1200 I. 7 2.0 2.2 1.9 2.6
1250 I. 22 1.5 I. 25
1300 0.88 I. IS 0.85

76
Table Xa

Summary Comparison of Average Creep Strengths - 0.1% per 1000 Hours (ksi)

3 Cr - 1 Mo (1) 5 Cr -12 Mo 5 Cr - !2 Mo-Si


Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 38.0 23.0 22.3


850 28.4 29.5 19.0 17.5 18.2
900 19.5 22.0 15.0 14.0 14.3
950 14.0 16.1 11.6 11.1 11. 0
1000 10.6 11.5 9.0 8.8 9.2 8.2
1050 8.1 8.0 6.7 6.8 6.4 5.9
1100 6.8 5.5 4.9 5.0 4.6 4.2
1150 3.5 3.4 3.2 2.9
1200 2.4 2.25 2.3 2.0
1250 1.6 1.4
1300 1.1 0.98

(1) Excluding quenched and tempered material

5 Cr -12 Mo-Ti 7Cr-~Mo 9 Cr - 1 Mo


Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Indivi<l. Parameter

800 25.5 23.2 38.2


850 21. 8 17.1 27. 3
900 27. 4 17.7 15.0 12.7 21.0 19.8
950 17.0 13.9 10.8 9.4 15.8 14.5
1000 10.8 10.5 7.8 7.0 11.6 10.5
1050 6.7 7.5 5.6 5.2 8.7 7.8
1100 4.1 5.2 4.2 3.9 6.4 5.8
1150 2.6 3.4 3.0 2.9 4.8 4.4
1200 1.6 2.2 2 .15 2.2 3.6 3.4
1250 1.55 1.6 2.65 2.6
1300 1.13 1.2 1.95 2.0

77
Table Xh

Summary Comparison of Average Creep Strengths - 0.01% per 1000 !lours (ksi)

3 Cr - 1 Mo (1) 5Cr-!:z!\lo 5 Cr - '1 '1o-Si


Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 28.5 14.8 17 .5 18.5


850 22.6 21.3 13.0 13.6 14.1
900 14.5 15.4 10.9 10.8 10.7
950 9.7 10.9 8.4 8.5 7.8
1000 6.7 7.4 6.4 6.4 5 .45 5.5
1050 4.9 4.9 4.5 ' 4.5 3.8 3.8
1100 4.0 3.2 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.6
1150 1.8 1.85 1.86 1. 8
1200 1.1 1.0 1. 3 1. 22
1250 0.90 0.84
1300 0.62 0.59

(1) Excluding quenched and tempered materia 1

5 Cr - !z Mo-Ti 7 Cr-~ Mo 9 Cr -1 tlo


Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 21.5 17.0 27.0


850 17.3 12.3 19.2
900. 13.4 8.8 9.1 13.8
950 9.9 6.6 6.7 10.0
1000 7.8 7.0 4.7 4.9 8.0 7.3
1050 4.6 4.6 3.2 3.6 5.6 5.4
1100 2.7 3.0 2.1 2.6 3.9 4.0
1150 1.6 1.8 1.3 1.95 2.7 3.1
1200 0.93 1.1 0.8 1.4 1.9 2.3
1250 0.47 1.0 1.3 1.80
1300 0.27 0.94 1.45

78
Table Xia

Sunnary Comparison of Minimum Creep Strengths - 0.1% per 1000 Hours (ksi)

3Cr-1Mo(l) 5 Cr - ~ Mo 5 Cr - !2 Mo-Si
Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Indivi<l. Parameter lndivid. Parameter

800 27.9 16.5 15.5


850 21.3 13.5 12.1 13.0
900 16.0 10.8 9.7 10.2
950 11. 7 8.4 7.7 7.8
1000 8.4 6.4 6 .1 6.9 5.8
1050 5.9 4.8 4.7 4.9 4.2
1100 4.0 3.6 3.5 3.4 2.9
1150 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.0
1200 1. 75 1.55 1. 7 1.45
1250 1.2 1.03
1300 0.84 . 72

(1) Excluding quenched and tempered material

5 Cr - ~ Mo-Ti 7 Cr - ~ Mo 9 Cr - 1 ~lo

Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Jndivid. Parameter

800 15.7 16 .9 25.9


850 13.4 12.4 18.5
900 20.8 10.8 11. 2 9.2 14 .1 13.3
950 13.0 8.5 8.1 6.8 10.4 9.8
1000 8.2 6.4 6.0 5.0 7.7 7.1
1050 5.0 4.6 4.3 3.8 5.7 5.3
1100 3.1 3.1 3.1 2.8 4.2 3.9
1150 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.1 3.1 3.0
1200 1. 2 1.35 1. 7 1.55 2.3 2.3
1250 1.2 1.15 1. 70 1. 75
1300 0.87 0.85 1.30 1. 35

79
Table Xlb

Summary Comparison of Minimum Creep Strengths - 0.01% per 1000 Hours (ksi)

3 Cr - 1 Mo(l) S Cr - 12 ~lo S Cr - 12 Mo-Si


Temp. °F Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 21.0 9.6 12.0 13.0


8SO lS .s 8.7 9.5 10.0
900 11. 2 7.1 7.S 7.6
9SO 7.9 S.5 5.9 5.S
1000 S.4 4.1 4.4 3.4 3.9
lOSO 3.S 2.9 3.1 ' 2.4 2.7
1100 2.3 1.9 2.1 l.6S 1. 8S
llSO 1.2 l.2S 1.14 1.3
1200 0.7 0.7 0.79 0.88
12SO o.ss 0.60
1300 0.38 0.43

(1) Excluding quenched and tempered material

S Cr - 12 Mo- Ti 7 Cr - 12 Mo 9 Cr - 1 ~·IO

Temp. OF Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter Individ. Parameter

800 13.2 12.3 18. 2


8SO 10.7 8.9 13.0
900 8.2 6.0 6.6 9.4
9SO 6.1 4.6 4.8 6.8
1000 s.o 4.3 3.2 3.5 5.6 s.o
lOSO 2.9 2.8 2.2 2.6 3.9 3.7
1100 1. 7 1. 8 1.4 1.9 2.7 2.7
llSO 1.0 l. lS 0.88 1.4 1.9 2.0S
1200 .60 .62 O.S3 1.0 1.3 I.SS
12SO 0.31 0.7S 0.94 1.20
1300 0.19 0.62 0.98

80
Figure 7a. Variation of yield strength of JCr-lMo steel with
temperature.

81
Figure 7b. Variation of tensile strength of JCr-lMo steel
with temperature.

82
Va:riat ton of d~n~at i'r:iin i~n·~. if"!!!'~~-~~)t ~·\}in
3Cr-1Mo steel with temperature.

83
V1~!l"'i1~t1."1':!'li ;;:if yi!l[fld
with temperature.

84
with temperature.

85
. . ,,, 'b.Jd::!rt ,~:f •!ii!:'ton~·atia:r!i and r-.e';
5Cr-!Mo steel wi t.h temperature.

86
V~tr:~~·~ :~,bl:n blf yleli.d ~tr;!!!ngt h
steel with temperature.

87
·'t;iii.i!:" liii.·t i ifl!l'li 'o:f tena :ii!! il!itr:-!!!ngt h
steel with temperature.

88
:~~g, 9e. w~il:"litI~;rii ~t il:i:lriiiitiori a.~d r:~diiii::tien ~:f 1u·aa
of 5Cr-!Mo-Si steel with temperature.

89
Yii!i.:dii!i.t ion !1;f ::d'!! ~d ~1':r~!'l".~t'h
steel with temperature,

90
'1!!'!9,:if'i!9.ti~
!!'l!f 'terli!!tl,e :!liti!'"•li!il"l~t~
steel with temperature.

91
92
'!j!'~~:..,!lt.:.0,•i:}fl ,\'.l'f y:~~l'd: i!.lt~!!!i:rii,gi.;h
steel with temperature.

93
!Ui:n .of t"1ir,!f:f.il"1! :!.iit:!"',~r.gt:h
steel with temperature.

94
; .::::ttl ';...+~

+t .~ Stlta~ ~ ~ _. .
. - -ct-:1-if =+£ . Er r~t :3 -e ~~ +S: x ·
~ 'rl•I•· ~ii=;.+Y'.tclift>!l:Ci:i;: '~::": Xt,
• - ~. ~-+ti::; h . . .,~t::r'-: .. 1: L. 1: ,.
t-+- •
•+
·-T--+tt
q:i !,
u..... r+= ..
.il •. ;:µJf'µ_41'!1:~j' ..
,.r.. :
t-·i~-~~--.~~; ~L~P~.~i·
. ~;~ft if, :'3 :mf:-:t:-t"'': ,;!: tti·:
.- '~ .. ~ +l+ ~~ ~ ~i~~ R~-f: ~ ~1¥t-tf.-t ~: :~ H~' if~ ~~:-
:-" n ,, . ifd7 ili: ~~ ! ~3: $ ::,.,.; 11 01 13:'
t~i1 E:f. +1 :r.'' I
-tr ' I.~~;; t~~ ; ~ '. ~ ~~ T.f: :r: I;: q~: rffi fJf ~; ~+ t
.:tl:l: c;.1; ;:J:C)j''" ' ' ' fc:,.; "" ;j ·1· » ..
. 1~E
"
:r£F(: !1'1
H
•.!+L[ :;:: ~t·.1i: j:t: :·1: ;:;: tt'i ;,"f'J'.: -
, ;d J:.=rc;: !:~ ;:i: i ii~:: ft§ E1 l:i.; F' 8i; iit , 1 ''

· t , '+\ :;; t}l r:'.T !'if:r•:s: i''~ l!~L'P f:LiH ' :'fI hr, :r;:1rr·'
1

>+4 lit µ r:1-C1 f' "~ r~l" tr 1 ~ :Ff ,:; ,, .: IL :1 n; ~ ' .


•~ J'.+cii!f :. ii,Ll ~,, !f 1:: ~ f-t:! ifJ:;;c; :.,iii m~ ·d# +
· ·~1;::cr2 1 :1'.'t1;~·· 'T:: ml+1A:·,;-~m.:1 ·rr;. ·-
: ~ :::~ ": m' i'. 1i i I t;g -:-i ;'·. •f. ~;C:c fj~ !:!± tr'
:t~ ~~hn:g+~ :~-m t.r ~~. .-t ~i FE mt!:
. ·-~h ~~ +••: fl:. "' ~ t _:r' i \[ .lli:f
..., : ~:; i;\: qc. ~ §§ +!.i TUlfa ~'::1
.' ~ ;.:: 1 ~:w ni~ l~i :it~ f4: +tt HU
ht' jrrr t;.t: rn fH t i~li + 1. 1
""1~m11 :J:1" mt · '1
. .. · .:.. iikr= ~ ;rn Itli • ·
. ;i::l B~ i?'tJ ::-:;. ~ :~n\i' fr111 c:
i- ' i± ~rn ;ff :ens ~fr1:;1.i r: tr 1 ' j_: I

+; 'i s. ' % £ ~t rnw'1~tiJ1~ 1 ~ r tfif


1' "" : I'" 4:' c::: :c: t::" cte
"r•H HI wL1:1 ~J: "He:: .. C1f!1 .........
'•'}.ii(:' L[.:-i,~~ !ii: j' ,i:; +'pr ~\' ~;!,J.:. llJi-t
. JJ{~ ·~Il'.CJ :,/;: ''[ ::f:tj )f Ttili,~#-1 jL
'j; :·: IT :t:-;. !~! r;: ::-;: f:! 1i11f'Ii !~; W':. 1

· . " ' ~;i ~t ~!'


i' ' ;' '': T: 1:-11 '.~, 1 :
·I~ r ;~ ·:L W: ~ ~ .~ l ! ~:: ~if ·:r:~ i:~; ;;: i~-:~~:j~ F.f.
1 1

i: • r@ui.i.±.Hf t~-µ Hl :::1t;r!~ill


'.,I~ tiV " ti F! :~;~ii : ::!; :1~ :~:i '.
,;;:;

rn
:t ti fffi 1 ,,, lt :·;! 1h1 : J 1
lL. .u: ,
1
• ·ii · ::.+1 ·: • ' 1 ~n·. iW :;: .:.1 : ' '
",m 1IH ir~un t:.rn:• i~ '', , 'i' .:-q., : , 1
:fffi it Ll'i'' im t " mi ..
:1 +Ji" .ip1r. · i# 7 rn~1ti ~tt t ,..
Fig, llc, Variation of elongation and reduction of area of
?Cr-!Mo steel with temperature,

95
Fig. 12a. Variation of yield strength of 9Cr-1Mo steel
with temperature.

96
Fi~. 'Ub., 'i!!1,~g:-:t!ii!.~:~~:!'! ~:f" ·r;:~:!ii~tl~ ~t.r!!!in~t.1i'!i t.'.lf 9C.:t-=lMt.'.l
steel with temperature.

97
\l'i!t,r:..,1€l!.'~i·l'}!!1 ~:f •1.i!l~ng,s_ti'1:!r•
;!il.'Flid r;j!~~~·t.;i'\t:;~,\!'!'ii
of 9Cr-1Mo steel with temperature.

98
3 4 567881 4567891 4 567891 3 4 5 6 7 891 4 567891
100 I

00
.,.oj
ID
JI:

fl]
fl]
co ~
co Ill::
E-<
fl]

····'°

10.

TIME FOR RUPrURE - hours


Pig. lJa. Stress vs time for rupture of JCr-lMo steel. The super-
imposed lines were computed from the master parameter curve, Pig. 16,
for other than quenched and tempered wrought material.
4 567891 4567891 4567891 4567891 4567891

100

rn
.....
8 ..
rn
[i}
rn

10

TIME FOR RUPI'URE - hours


Fig. lJb. Stress vs. time for rupture of JCr-lMo steel. The super-
imposed trend lines were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 16.
1 4567891 4567891 4567891 4567891 4567891
10019
8

10~
8
~ 7
m 6
oil:

..... en
g en
~
E-t 20
en

10

TIIllE FOR RUPTURE hours


Pig. lJc. Stress vs. time for rupture of JCr-lMo steel. The superimposed
trend lines were computed from the master parameter curve.
1 4 567891 4567891 4567891 4567891 4567891
1009
8

109

.
or!
>:
8
7
6

10

CREEP RATE - per cent per 1000 hours


Fig. 14a. Stress vs. secondary creep rate for JCr-lMo steel. The super-
imposed trend lines were computed from the master parameter curve, F!g. 19.
1 4567891 4567891 4567891 4 567891 4567891
100~
7
6

1019
8
7
or! 6
Ul
~

-
s en
en
fil
P:::
E-<
en
1
9
8
7
6

CREEP RATE - per cent per 1000 hours


Pig. 14b. Stress vs. secondary creep rate for JCr-lMo steel. The super-
imposed trend lines were computed from the master parameter curve, Pig. 19.
I 4567891 4567891 4567891
100 ~

10 ~
8
7
"" 6
m
.k:

10

CREEP RATE - per cent per 1000 hours


Pi~. 14c. Stress vs. secondary creep rate for JCr~lMo steel. The super-
imposed trend lines were comp~ted from the master parameter curve, Pig. 19.
.....
0
U1
-
0
~

Pig. 15c. Variation of rupture ductility of )Cr-lMo steel with time for rupture.
0

Variation of rupture ductility of JCr-lMo steel with time for rupture.


Fig. 15e. Variation of rupture ductility of JCr-lMo steel with time for rupture.
-
0

Fig. 15f. Variation of rupture ductility of 3Cr-1Mo steel with time for rupture.
Fig. 15g. Variation of rupture ductility of JCr-lMo steel with time for rupture.
0

9
~~ g !::rn~~ ~~~

-
8

7
~
6

3 --- "

'
'"' I" ~

.
'1
··-··· I"
I"
~
1'
1'
Ir

" ~

'
' "

'
I 1'

.
:=
==
~

- E
~

• I~

1
Fig. 16. Variation of Larson-Miller rupture parameter
with stress for JCr-lMo steel.

112
10

9:
8
I=
7
§
6
!:::
~

~
5
:::

4 ~

"
3

"
,.
I'\

. ' ~

..
I IJ \
,. ' I'\ •' " I~•• ..
,
'

~
6

. ~
~

-~

I
p g . 17a. Variation of rupture strength of JCr-lMo
steel with temperature.

113
-- -1 4- FF

~ ! ~ ~­
i::J=-1 ·=
1~:-=
~+-:::

--r----
----

mEEEEEEEffiffmff&EmNlEESWWmESE=EmEEffi~ff
~ =s_-=i-=

H-+-++-+-+--+--+-H-+-+++-+--+-l-IH-t-++++-+-l-IH-t-+-+++-+-+-t-'W--H-~.i--+-+--+--+-H-t-t-+-+-+--+--+-iH-t-++-+-+-+-l-IH-t-i---~

H-+-++-++-++-++-t-+-++-+++++++-t-t--t-t--t-t--t-1--t-t--H--t-t--t-t--t-t--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t--+--t--+--t--+--t-H-t-+-~~

l-t-t-+-l-Hl-H-H-H-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-t--t-t--t-t-+++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-1-Hl-H~~-+-+-+-+-+-+-t-+-+-+--+-t--t-t--t-t-+--i-~~-~ -- ·=
1-+-+-+-++-t-t-t-t-t-t-+-+-++-+-t-+-1-Hl-t-t-+--t--+-+-t-t--+-t-+-t-t-t---t-l-IH-t-+-t--+-t--+-t--t-t--t-t-+-t-t-t---t-l-l~t- \$ ~ =~1=1-'t
l--l-l-l-l--+--+-++-+-+-+-l-+--t-++-l-+~f-+-+++-+-l-+-+--+--++-+-+---l-+--+-l-+++--+-+-l--+++-+-+-+-++-+-+-+++-t-1tt= Jj- -:-
....+
1-"I-'-+-'-+"-+ ....-1~-_;-"1-,_+-.,ter+"'=+=""+
....4..-.-+
....+ ....-1-....,-+"'-1.,;-1;--"1-,_+-._+t,+"=+-:::+,..4-:-+:-:1-1~-;-=-=1-'='+-'-+"=+~+,.._+-=4::--1:-:-1:-:1-;-::::1-'='+-'="+.._+-:::+±+-=-+:-:-+c-::.-1,.:--;-;:;1-::-+-~+"=+j;+
....-+-.;-+~-1~-1;-_;-<-;;>::--+-:-+.._+ ....4
....+ ~--+-__.i"""'-,_,_,-
~1g. lro. ,ar1a~1on op rupture strength of JCr-lMo
steel with temperature.

114
: -
7

5
~

~
4
~

3
,,,,

"
~
I'
!'-
.. ~

:::::
~

"
"
I'
"
'

lm
6

.
4

"
3

. ~

I
i·· g. c. 'ar~at on oj rupture streng th of JCr-lMo
steel with temperature.

115
., "

~- ........... _ .... ': "::: · · :: ::,: .1u1all • i.;.;..--_ :mi.....,:·· . .: ,..


. ~: : : : : : : : ~: : : ..
; .. :::; cpi~ :;JI ..... ···
·:.: :.,
. I.;,.;.
-.. ·:: ' .. . . . . . . .. . .
, .. ·'·'
..

.'i : .. .. ......... " ,..


~~-'-1--:+~-:+c...+.:..;+.;.;..;.+-;.:.+''.,..;+.:.;,;+:.'~~+:c.,i.,..:..;+-+-+-:i+.,.,..,b'"b'-1-:-1~-:-t,.-,.,+~,.,,.+=r~...,.,.,..-r~~60
" .. :' .::; •••:1. :: . . . ·;:: ... - :
: :: . . ::
·:
.. ·: l<H 0 F

. : :
.. . :.:: :: : ::::1:
:
~t
,I

~
- -1- 1- 1-
. .J~C

t
H
e ·- I ~r
....- lr.t
\
1 e~ d 11 r1

I
/ A \

-~+~-r-~~~·+-+--+--+--+-->-+-+---+-~+--r-~~-r--f-'+-c-t-+-c-t-T--t--t-t--
i j I 20

--t: ~--+: ~---. -~-'--~+--r-·-T--1---[·. __ !_ ~l~_u ~t- ~+--1---+--+-;;:"--~-t--+--+--r--+--1-t--1


-1--- .. ,._
L .. +--+--,
:
--t--1--•,•-· 1 •T
I
I
1neaar1 i~:n1
~+--+-'.~l+··-4
..~._,_-+-~~-+-+_++4
..~---+-·--+--~-~-+f+l-++,-+
.. -+-t--r-+-+l-t-J---t-~+-t--+-+-+-JO
6t> ?J
T+-+- !SP
-+--r- ·
901
1--·-rl~~O!- 110! i:o
r--1--+-+ -+,---t~i--+--+--+--+--=t--!--+--+--1
l'O

18. Variation of rupture strength of JCr-lMo steel


with tensile strength at 75 F.

116
:_t:.

-- . -1
:· ~- ·-!"-

~- :.r--:+:-
.. -+ ;.....__
..__.,__ -~

-;- :- .:f·· _-_


- t--
----r-· ---
-

4 __

1--
r---r--- 1---t--r--r--
3 __ - t- - +-- r-r--

-----
--

- ~-1-

l-l-++-+-1-++-+-1-++-+-1-++--J'li.l-f9f--+-1H1·~~+-IH-t-t-H--t''f-H-t-t-t-+---t-t-t-+--t-t-t-+-t-rt-~-+-+-+-1-+-+- -r-T-T-t-r---t--;-t-t---i--e-

2__. . . ~ --·~
.
-+-t·- t-- =t=
t-
+- - I-
t-- ~

5

4.

____ f';~::::. +__,.-.,-+-+·-+- --- - ~-r-1--- -

3_

__-_+-~ t:(~
l-l-l--+-l-1-1-1--+-1-l-l-l--+-1-1-1-1-++-+-+-+++-+-+-++++-+-++++-H-t+--l---t--l-t+-+-t-_H ,_ ~--

I'
l-l-l--l-+-l-++-+-1-++-+-1-++-+-1-++-+-1-++-+-11-+++-f--+++-H+-t-H+t~+-_1~+-_t_,__ __._----1---+--_,'-: :~~ -'-:~1-1- '1-- __ ,_-+---t--+-+-1--t-

2 '
i--L.....L....1- - - - - 1-1--1---J'I\ r--i\ -·t- ---
1

~ +--I- J__

1-+-+-+++-+-++++++-+-++++-+-t-+-+-+-++-+-t-++-++-+-+--t-+-t-t-++-t--t,---t-Ji-
- - -t--+-i-.-+-

~~~. I- -~; _ t- +- - l
L .LJH~+L.i~~-~H~~~~~~+~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~+-L_-H~~l-~l-;-~+-~H:·~-1-~l-1~-l-L---'--'---l...J.._j_J_~··j~+~··'-:'-'-'-'-'--'__._.....~f-~­
Pig. 19. Variation of Larson-Miller creep rate
parameter with stress for JCr-lMo steel.

117
-

"" .... ~

J~I LI
.... .... _
I ""
9

..... 6
fll
.!<ls
50
t/)4
I'll
~
et::
~
I'll

20

....."'..."'... ... . .......

-'- • " ,...


.-- --= 10
' ·-

!-+-+-+---+--+-+-- ,}= ... ~ -


-~b-­ ·--·j;::E ~J ;_·c-i:LE -
_tl=c.:-· ·- -· 1= 1
- -E~-t=t~ j:j----t .-+-- ~-- ~=t~
-- .. I - _ _ ._ _ ;_+_-F_ j -i-=t--=H- -+~- __._
-1·- --:-----+-- ......._ __ f-- - -I --t- + t=1
tt.:t:Jt::tj·:-j=l=--:~J-- ·+=l:..e-f= ::J:_::J ::::;:__ ·--+-- -i-- '·-·'
· ~j. --~r-!-r--1- ---J--1i---t-<--t-1-+--l~· -- 4+-1-1--t--+--+--t--t- !-- t-1 --1--l- - -t--+-t--+-+-tC---,--
! H=+l-=l=l=l=:J::++:l=l=H=+::J:=l=1=1=H=+:l
-l-+-l--l-+--H-i-l-l-+-l--l-+--H-'-l-l-+4-+-l--H---H-i-l-l-+-l-..-i.-'-1---l-l-l-+-+-l-+--H-i-l-l-l-l-4-l---H--Hl-l-l-l-+-l--H---H-i-l-l-.J..4.-l2
== -= =- =1--.k~i\:=---j'·uu-t:~.=i-<im:i:i--r:t::~m~::tt:r1w1:1111mn-ml-
- - - - -- IJ1::1-•1L--+ J,j__ -t --e---'--t---t--+-+-t--+--1
1-U.-- +-+~"-......... -+-+-+->--+--+~---+--<
f--H-f-- -

- - - - -i=J-1--t-+-t-+--+-+-+--1--t---HH-+-+-: -+--t-+--1-1-t----H-t---t---1-+--+-+--J-H+ ,+ 1--t---H-+-+-t--'---+-+-t-1--t---'-1--t--t---1--+-t--1-


-++1--+--1--+--1-+--+-+--+- ·- -
l--+--t--t--l--t--1-1--t--'-H--+--t-tl--t---t-+--t---T- - - - -
--+-t-t-+-+++--' --l- - -
--I
f-
-L-W__L l--
-----~
l'T_.I'.'.,_,___
r !- - -·-
J
-- -r1--·----
- -· - - r--1--1- -
---
- -- -- ---1-1- -
t-t- + I
----1---·1--1--1--

-t--t-r+-+-t-

1-+--+--<-+-t--+---+--+--+ •·-+1--+-->--+-+-+--+---+--+-++H+-t+r~ --+-+---l--t--+--t-+---1---+-+--•

Fig. 20. Variation of creep strength of 3Cr-1Mo steel


with temperature.

t18
:, :::::=r.::::,:;;tt:;:j:?.-r:::-rr:~f'o'fFF'Arit~1:XJG'i:;.::: 1 -·::' .. ::;: :" :f: :: .• ::y:,: :•·, !:[;';:ff:h'~:t!1:rn°T:~
~=-~-~ ~G"~E"§@"T'"""f"='i="-t.~ .1: 0ig' :~fl:.:-::'-, •::: ::: :: ... ·: :..... '61< ::: ::•: ::;: :::~ H;:ff-§fil't::= :;:
:~:-:-:;~; :;-~t: ~; .-::-~;.;~.: ~;;~~;i~~ ~:~ ;;·; ·;~~ ;.;~; ·:::: :::'.-:::: ::: .... ·: ::·: ~~r~:~ t ~;: ;;;~r;+:<;;~~;;-~ r~;:~;;; ;;;;_ ;~;~ :'._:..o

~:-::.;:=:~~~'"'~~s::.l#tif~:.;.;.::·~;~~:0:~5~:iii"::~:l'::L ::1::, '"" :...::=·


:: :: := ~::i=:.::xu;~:lAl:~:pi::·i=:,
~:0s=: ::~~ =,:: ,.=: :C~'t.:-~ :i--. ·'-· ·:;· ~:? '~1 :k: '.~ ..:~11,=:: ~:~: :i~;1 ::::..:.:.:: :~:•::1::: : : ~.1;: 'c::t:';;i;: c;~;ci: i .., :: :;;
~=~: :.:;;. ::11:.i.:: 7 :::= =:2 :;::_
s: il:g:fF-. .:i:i{~~-~':~".°:' '''=;;..:;'.~~,.:.: :::: :;•i;::.-·:i:k;~;::1:.:: ::: L : : : :~ :; L ": "'''" : :: :
:::? ~~ ?~~ :-:::~ :~:; .~' ::~s:l?+i:'. ~ElfSE :~,~~ -.~~ :.1::j;:;;: =:-:: ~:i[:; U =:. :::: ); ;' : +~:p ' :;y• f':t ;c:: ::::rL'' : >
:::: -:=-: ·::.: ;.~~0;~ ;~;-t ~ ~:::;~:~ ·~~~ ~-:-~ :.:~~ ~:: ~~ .;;_~_. ~~:~ ;~~~ ;:~; ;;:~ ;~~; :-~;~· ;;_:; ~;~~ ~7-;; ~·:~-~~~; ·:·: :-:: .. -::: ;:7": :::·:

:: :: :1•=•: ~ii''[; t;., li1 ~ti::J+~ ~',;Ji :· ·;, :tfltt b~· 1 t:il ft!H!fr I i•~1:: ::·='. '' :.:~ ...;.; ~,.;,;.;;.;,; :~ ;.,~;;~ •·
1
: :1;;::{'. J.~' 'Li
1
e:+;11m :~;1 ,, ill! r'n J!i rn. <i:: :n= :n ~;;u :r;;l};et;;cih~ & ,,.... ~~ ••·· ···

•.• 120•••·. iii<


' ....... ' ' .. ' ' .' " " .. ' • ::: : :::i •::: t •' :;. :

,~~I"''"' '~•~u ~~~ .t..;,


• . • • • • • .
. . .. . .
. I . . . . • . .

., .. ::!:: 1:.
.... . .. .'

... :::: :::: : ~ :i I .• •. .• .• ... . .. ' . . . .. . ... . ...


•• •• • • +• • •• • •' ..
Fi~. 21. Variation of creep strength of JCr-lMo steel
with tensile strength at room temperature.

119
1 4 567891 4567891 4567891 4567891 4567891
100~
e
6
5

00
or!
m
~

-"'
0
tll
en
~
E-<
U)

100 !. 0

10

TIME FOR RUPTURE - hours


Fig. 22a. Stress YB time for rupture for 5Cr-~Mo steel. The superimposed
curves were computed from the master·parameter curve, Fig. 25.
10
~
00
~
~
m
~

--
~
w
w
~
~
8
w
0

TIME FOR RUPTURE - hours


Fig. 22b, Stress vs. time for rupture for 5Cr-!Mo steel. The super-imposed
+rend lines were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig, 25.
1 4567891 • s 67891
lOQ
e
7
E'

TIME FOR RUPTURE


Fig. 22c. Stress vs. time for rupture for 5Cr-!Mo steel. The superimposed
curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 25.
4567891 4567891 4 5 67891 4567891 4 567891
10@1
~:!
~
·'a.
$

1'"' 100
~
.....
II)
:!$.
.;!
~ ;iii

·•
:!!
t/l
t/l
~
~

8
ti)

10~;1 ~.o
~
;,
·~

~
,,

CREEP P.Ji.TE - per cent 'fHH'' 1000 hours


Fig. 2Ja. Stress vs secondary creep rate for 5Cr-tMo steel. The superimposed
trend lines were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 27.
iq 00
ori 8
ID
~

... (/)
(/)
r.:I
~ ~
E-<
(/)

CREEP RATE per cent per 1000 hours


Fi~. 2Jb, Stress vs secondary creep rate for 5Cr-!Mo steel. The superimposed
trend lines were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig, 27,

iq
6
7
6

'

l
9
8
~
7
m 6
~

-
N
~
w

=
~
~
w

CREEP RATE - per cent per 1000 hours


Fig, 2Jc, Stress vs secondary creep rate for 5Cr-!Mo steel, The super-
imposed trend lines were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 27.
Fi~. 24a. Variation of rupture ductility of 5Cr-lMo steel with time for rupture.
Fig. 24b. Variation of rupture ductility of 5Cr-!Mo steel with time for rupture.
Variation of ductility of 5Cr-!Mo steel with time for rupture.
000

Pig. 24d. Variation of ductility of 5Cr-iMo steel with time for rupture.
Pig. 24e. Variation of ductility of 5Cr-!Mo steel with time for rupture.
--
w

Fig. 2~f. Variation of ductility of 5Cr-tMo steel with time for rupture.
10 __
9 __
s __ r

--
==o
7 ~~ ====
=
6 -
m B I=~~
t=:~
~~
::::= II
5_

- ~-

4 ~~

- ~- i--~

3
·- 1-1-;-

r
"" -- .. '
+ '~Fl=
2
'
,_
• +
, ,_ '-~~ -~

-- -, __
~~--

-
-~ ~ ~~ ~

,,
,
,
= ~'-

....

.kl
~

--""' ,_ . ,_ "'" .. ~

,-

1• -
" l'llo ,_
I r"!I ..-: -

-
~~
I II E'~
~

7_

5_
~

-
"
-
-- --

3_
- ,_
--

...
'
....
• "'"
,_
·-~

L
1g. Z! • VarJatJ on of Larson-M ller rupture parameter
with stress for 5Cr-!Mo steel.

132
9

8 § ~ §~
7
-~~ ~l=mi~~~
8

3 - ·-
'" ,,

. ......
' ... . Ill.

-
- '~

~· '"

· -
1
9

·--~
§§

6
m

. • r
" '~

" ,_
~~

1
F~ g. 26a. Varjat1on of rupture streni;!:th of .5Cr-~Mo steel
with temperature.

133
0

~.
- ·-·
9
i=i= § 11
~~~
=
7. -

6 -

. -
~

- --·
-
4 ,_
,_
,_

.
- -

...
...
,
,_

~~
'v
,.,,,
- ILU
'--'-- -

~ 1.. 1..
" ,_
,_
,_
"
"
"" -
' I' '
I•~
" .. 'ii'

9
~~ ~


8
§§ I=

7.

8-t::I::

c
•- ~
t:::
~
!::::

4
- ,_
,_

-,
3 ~

"'
"
''
~ 1. .

'"
1-,
'.

~L

Pig. 26b. Variation of rupture strength of 5Cr-!Mo


steel with temperature.

134
10 __

-
9
8_

7 --
==
'=
6 __

5_

4 __

....
l__

7- • EE
t=

5-

4-

3-

'' .. ,.
' ' 11

2-
-
. "
-
---
'
"
- "
"
-
Pig. 26c. Variation of rupture strength of 5Cr-iMo
steel with temperature.

135
9

~= ~=~~ rl 1n-= TH ! 'I Irr ll ~ //~J K~=· d~ -~~n~


0

1
2

---,-":l~
-:·--=~=·-t~I r.1 ;'.
-:=--:- . . -fl~_:·I,
n...
+ r fJ ·11·1
-,
ri

·; I:

:1--j I, I
i

I'I j -~.
I' t1 i\r-1-r
i I ; I i ··1 N-
-f:.T=.-·.
., .~1 • 1rr,
rJ-I
n
j
I ' - ' I
! : ; : I ii
'
j
' I . 'I ~ r .._1~
i I •
'1·1·
1-
- - ---- -· t
1--------r-----i-11·• t-rl- 1 •1: :·--1 -i r i---~,

,~ ~1 '~f pl~ ;; I : I : ( ~ • : ! i : J~ . : J6 ; ! i ;~8 : ·~- :-ti~ : , '-il:~F~


1[- rl11i 1 ,.,, .. '.:., i:.rl.l~>t---··:
tr- ~ 'Ii p := 'r (20 - log r ). x 10""~ ! ; I ·ti. T • ' ;~· ~·· t f
- 1 i
I I i
1
I
, 1
I
·
II
~
I
I

: •
I i . :
· '
' '. 1
1 , i• :' ' I ·
1'

r I : · 1
1 :-
r 1 I
·~
1 ,·
r;
r-!-
=

F ig. 27. Variation of Larson-Miller creep rate


parameter with stress for 5Cr-!Mo steel.

136
.......
.. .·
.....

4_

2----·
L .................................................~..........~-=--'"................................,._..--;-_..,....._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.__......_._.~~~~~
Pig. 28a. Variation of creep strength of 5Cr- Mo steel
with temperature.

137
10

8
l

5
9

- ~

2 ~

..
......
I
.. '

9
""'
8
l

~
--
..,,.,,. ~·
D.
I
9
8
l

5
-
4

I
Fig. 28b, Variation of creep strength of 5Cr-iMo
steel with temperature.

138
t 4567891
10~

:~

00
_,
m
~

rn
faP:
... E-<
rn
~

;Q

TIME FOR RUP!'URE - hours


Fig. 29a. Stress vs time for rupture of 5Cr-hto-Si steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. J2.
4567891 4567891 4567891 4567891 4567891

TIME FOR RUPl'URE - hours


Fig. 29b. Stress vs time for rupture of 5Cr-iMo-Si steel. The super-
imposed trend lines were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. J2.
TIME FOR. RUPTURE - hours
Pig. 29c. Stress vs time for rupture of 5Cr-iMo-si steel. The super-
imposed trend lines were computed from the master parameter curve, Pig. J2.
2 .~ s 6 7.89! .? ~ 7 .9..9' .2 .3

·•.t· 1 100

10

50

10

CREEP RATE - per cent per 1000 hrs

Fig. JOa. Stress vs secondary creep rate for 5Cr-!Mo Si steel. The super
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 32.
100

~

~

m 10,§
~
~
~

-0
00
00 +.
~
~
~ ]
00
20 ~

10 m ~

~
1
$


~

1 ~

CREEP RATE -per cent per 1000 hours


Fig. 30b. Stress vs secondary creep rate for 5Cr-iMo-Si steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 32.
!
10;it
;~

;!i

:~

oM t 0
Ill "!!!
.!ii:: ·;;

;~
(/)
.
.... (/)
~
p::
t 8
(/)
:~

CREEP RATE - per cent per 1000 hours


Fig. Joe. Stress vs. secondary creep rate for 5Cr-iMo-Si steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 32.
... "'

Pig. )la. Variation of ductility of 5Cr-!Mo-Si steel with time for rupture.
0
-
7

3 :=
~

. .. ... ....
.
,~

l"o
II..

"
-'
...

" "'
' ... '
1

~-
6 • • I •

3
~

....

,, "'
I\,.

. . I\,.

., .
1
Fig. J2. Variation of Larson-Miller rupture parameter
. I

with stress for 5Cr-iMo-Si steel.

151
10
-

~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~
- ~§

,,
-
,_ -
'' ... tw.11.;11111-
... "'
, I ' "'i... ~' h

9
8
7

4 '~'~

2 "

i...
'
'
I

"
I
, "
' '"
9
8
z
6

4 ~·
~
-~

3
-,
-
;:c - ·.:.::..··-.-
~
'
- ,-1
-- -- - ~~-
--

2
-I - I
,_ ---

Fft::
I
--~ - t
Fig. JJa. Variation of rupture strength of 5Cr- Mo-Si
steel with temperature,

152
.
10
~ -
j:.~ -
··- - --

-· -- -··-

8
l
-+
6 :::r.:... -~~
~

-~

~
5 ~

4 -
t:::
t:::

3 E
~

~
~
,... ,...
2

... ,...
I"

r...
I !'I
9 ~

8 to
t:::
l ~

6
~

5
~
~

4
~
3
§
t::
~

2 ~

,...
I " I' f'
t::
9
8
j:::;
l
~

. -
~

I
Fig. JJb. Variation of rupture strength of 5Cr-~Mo-Si
steel with temperature.

153
10
-
-

,_
,_

- -
-¥-- ---
.... -~

'

--- -
, ,. "r....
:=E
7
~~
;;;;;;
:::::: ~
6


- ,_
" ,_ ...
... ...
" ,..,

.I
... L ~
I'
''
I ' ·-
!'..
·-
9
~

8 -·- ·-
l

5
"
4
~

,
-
3

. r-

I
11.·u ~.

_J
-
~ ~

I
_,_ -+-
i 1+ - - -~ -·
-

Fig. JJc. Variation of rupture strength of 5Cr-tMo-Si


steel with temperature.

154
"

.....
~5
I 4

'"'
I' ' I\.
I\

I' "I\.
'

~--

-j

- ,-- -~ --LJ--l--l-l-+-1--+-f-+-+-l--+--H-+-t-+--H-

1-1-1-1-
l-f--l--l-l--1--1--l--lf-+-+-+-+--f-+--l--'-+-H--t-+-+-+-'L
_JI p I' ~ II B
"'" I,~ 1. 'I
,__ -K-
~. l---1--1-1-+-l-1

Fig. )4. Variation of Larson-Miller creep rate _parameter


with stress for 5Cr-!Mo-Si steel.

155
10 _
9_
''
s __
7_
6-
5_

4 __

3_ -
"'EE
t=t=


........ +=r:
B ~g:: ~~ ~~ ~ ~~
"'
- !'~ §~ Ill ~
to
t::

.~
--
............... tit' .
I

"
I" I' "~
l'I
l'I
" l"I !'- "
l_ ~
- ...... ..... • " ... 10
9_
B
7
6_

5 5
4

-
~
11.:1111 IL ll ~ 6
,,
L_ , =e PI:
n
I'\

'' ~ . l'
'" 1
9
B
]_
~-~
6
5
.5
4
~~

3_

.2
'"
''
"
I ,I,

,., .. "' IJ rl ]fl Il


L
Fig. 35. Variation of creep strength of 5Cr-1tMo-Si steel
with temperature.

156
J '517111 •517111 ' 5 6 7 111
lD'f 1

7
6
5
4

lCf
8
lOO
7
ori 6
m
~

-"
en (/)
(/)
'

~
E-<
(/)

'
I
:10
8
7
6
5

'
J

TIME FOR RUPl'URE - hours


Fig. J6a. Stress vs time for rupture of 5Cr-iMo-Ti steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. J9.
1 4 567891 4567891 4567891 4567891 4567891
100~

1019
8

-4
!I)
,k:

.....
~ {/)
{/)
r:<1
p::
8
{/)

10
7
6

TIME FOR RUPTURE - hours


Fig. J6b. Stress vs time for rupture of 5Cr-!Mo-Ti steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. )9.
4567891 4567891 4567891 4567891 4 5 67891

10

TIME FOR RUPTURE - hours


Fig. J6c. Stress vs time for rupture of 5Cr-!Mo-Ti steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. J9.
, 4567891 4567891 4 5 6789• 4567891 4567891
100/i
8

io:i 100
8
-t
II)
~

...
a> (/)
0 (/)
M
er:
E-<
(/)

100~ 10
8

CREEP RATE - per cent per 1.000 hours


Fig. J7a. Stress vs secondary creep rate for 5Cr-!Mo-Ti steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 41.
l~t:=:t:=t::::P:+:+t::t=t::)::l::t:t:;:::;:;tr:;:rt:::::t::=t;:::t4~ 10
e!'±r-'"t'".,,..,-r:-Tc--r:i4~T-:-r:r-ir:r-r---:-++t-'..,..;..o-r---r-r4""'r-n;.,,.,,

.....
CD
.....

1.0 10
CREEP RA'l'E per cent per 1000 hours
Fig. J7b. Stress vs secondary creep rate for 5Cr-iMo-Ti steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 41.
,. c.n en ....,oac.o-

"' ... "'


"'

Variation of ductility of 5Cr-!Mo-Ti steel with time for


5

" -
II' J
l'I

2 _ _.
1 . 1'
. ._ _

i l::t:t::t:~:::t+::tt+t:j::::j:::t:::J=~:::f=l:=t+++:::J::+:++H=~_=++=+++-~
"
l-1---++--l--+---l-l-+-l-1---+-++++++--+-+--1-++++++-t-+--1-+-H-f-++f~•t ~ \
-A.l-'--+-+-+-+--1-~-t--1---1--1--+-+-+-+-+-+--+--+-+-

:". ,_tc- ·- - !-=-=::.::~ .. - 1::.....

6_

5_

'-'-'
4

p --
,, l'l

+-+--1-+-+-+-t-+-+ - ' -+--1--+--1-+-+-"--+-+-+-+ 'i;~'- f--~~


3_ f--

~+-+-++-+-+-1-+-+-+-+-+--1---+-+-+-+-+-+-+--t--t---r+-t-+-+-+-+--+--f--c--+- f -- ----- . _,_ -- ~ : : -:-


- ~rs; := JU:W=!=!
I
- ~ -+-+---t_,__,__

H-+-+-+-++-++--H-+--t-+-f--1--H-+-t--J-+-+-t-+ +-l--t--+--l--1H-
-----~
---c-- ,_,-r:\- ,.----- _ ,_ --•-- -
- _,___ ~
-- -

f\1111.
-- -1-- ~,~-- -
'I\

_,__
2_ _- ,_ ----
~-_t:. __ i} i=: ·- - __ ,_, _c::c::_ "' - -
_ _
' . 1--It-
_
~~-- ----~·· ~-
,_,_ _j__j___j_j__j__.)_"'l
_
t:t::t-
+-+-+-f--+-+'---+-+-+-+-+ +-1--l--+-+-H-+-+-+ i-1..-1---1..- _ .__
+-+--+--+-+-!- - · - - H- - , _ -- ~

-~-1-~=~ ~ ,,~ 11 -ll-~~ 1 ~. - -- - --~


-f--

-~--- -1--1--1--1---
- ----
t--!-- t--t-- t--

-~-+-+--~+-!--+
j__

J.__ -
-·- -
- ·--

~-+--l---f---1--~+-+--+-+-+-+--H--"--"-+-t--+--1-~--i- j__ -.l- - - - - ·-

'1-
j f:
. .
Fig. 39. Variation of Larson-Miller rupture parameter
with stress for 5Cr-iMo-Ti steel.

164
8
Fl'i= t::
= '1-

·· r - i - 1 . I'\.:·
I •
-~
3
i--+-·'~
l--+---t--t-+-;--r-1--- "

rl--l--++++--H-l--H--+++++-t--t-1r-+t++t-tt--H--t-t-H
.

" ''

.
4

Fig. 4oa. Variation of rupture strength of 5Cr-!Mo-Ti


steel with temperature.

165
1~8~_-_ '":" ___: '~~---=~ -'=~(-~_:! .i _;_~, .--~ _: __ "'j· -_r--.:
·-r: ·.i--
.-t' :•:~-~":
:i.::·.
_,.
.. :. "'
=

••
. c= · · :-,ci-l'C' · -'fcf-1.-1 Ll .C:C -r-"' c/;·· ·.or- :-:i - ::-:C::.:_-:__
··"'Cec "'i:CL; f i [-_t '-- l.::to· '- . ·-,~~ -· -_-c;,_ -F-
7 d._::cfJ-··· ·-i-~- I- 1-r- - ·- . .:_.::....::..:i---~

._., -- -+ -==tI:-_ :--r=t~ -_-


6 -
=·· =: ·:J= J=k -t-+t-.-i. .. ,_-.,.- ,-,- ·-~r-

__.,: =~"'.:.,.Tlf-' :f-'-::r ,- -- ,....: :: r.:-~ - ~....::.

5- +-l~-:g~ ~ ~- -~-'"r=r= r-r--

_;;_
~~-- ;
~- ~~E:-·~ r~~~·;_: -
4
- i-i-EE£ •. =:= 1-=:~~;::·~ ~::r~-T: --~==:_:
1-t
::t-. :r:
- i-i-i-i-

- t-t·r- -1 +- i-· - .
:=: ~:. -
-r-rt-

~ lit-=~li:t-: t:(: :!: t:J:=[: :t: t:(: :!~'"';:J, [: :t: j: :N~:1=1;: :t: j: :): :j:=l=i=1+ =t=J:+:J:=1=-t"_1,_=__:~~:):=::tJt t-·-tr- ~1"-t-·>·_,~c-~- 1-~-~ ~ ~~: i-+-~t-t- +~-t:~_,-=_~-;~-=
t--+-t-t-t-t-t-t-r-+-+-t-+ -· i-t--j- ___ ,_,_,_,_ -· r- - -- - r -

§1~ -_ ~..:r-::: r::::, ·- - -__ - . -

···r-- :~- -
t::::.-:"1·-:-1-f= - i::.-i::-..:t:- -:.+- =-.
6

3
-~- .. !-
I !J :
t-1+-t-+-+-t-++-+-t--+-t-+-+-t-T-+-+-+-+-- - - - - - '
-- - .
-- - - t-
::f' - ---~-
i- .=t- -11\ - - - t-- ..... t I
11[ .
T r
!I
I: r 1
Ii:
I,
I,
h> ,_ --+-t-+-++-+-t-++-;t-t-+-t -- - - - - - - ,_ - -11- " - - f- · · \ -I , . I
I
I I I I i I I
2
!1':1-~~!
1
:
_ l-1 ! I
1 1
1:
i :j I

1 I I I

11: : i 'i
I
I

l I
I

Fig. t~uo. 1ar a .1on o:r rupture strength of 5Cr-tMo-Ti


I j I
Steel with temperature.

166
--·

5
:- -_
-.. ~=-

- f--1- ·-
~. + -·-
4
-
r-r·r·•-

:-~: .~~~~ =r~=

3_ J'111111111111111111-~1>-~m+fil--~-
f:----+.:-
l-+-1--H-+--t-+-+-++-+-++-+-++++++-+-+-+-+-t-+-t-+-1--H~'~-----1
-----1~-+-+-~-++-"=+~++-++++-+++~.:::-.:::-.:::-t='t='i=::'i=::'r~H'r-i-~"-+--+•-+~--t=:+-+~-
l-+-1--H-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-++++++-+-+ +--+--+--~-+-,-+---+-+~-+-+-+-+-+-· 1-·l--Hl-H-+--t-+--+-+-+-++-+-++-+-+-+-+++++-+·j-+~-

··-
l"I

1--H-+--t-+-t-t-+--+--ll,,<+---+-++.ut-++-+-++-+-t-+-1-+-1---H~rl-++-+-++-+-+-i,~-I-++

1--H-+--+-+-+-++-++--+V-+++-Nll-+-+-+-+-+-t-+-1-t--H-,1--H-+--+-+-+-t--t-.i F~ ·
t--t-t--t--t-+--t--t- ·-~--+-+-+--+- •-+--t-t--+-+--t--+-i--+-+-+--t--t
~ ~-~r-•- •-~·--·-

--=_;·:;-;,~z~~~--
. .:-:-_;
. -- -=--

~ -_ ·.=::.-: -
-~-~

-
.

: ~·.:. -::~-:..:: - --
7

6_ - -r= ~~ =:-==
- -
-~-.

----~ . .:-.
- -_:" f--- ~

t- -
5_
-J :I - -
· - ·- -·>---
---e-·----
-·-

4 -f--1--1--1-- -

- ---=-=~-:::: rq+,_ t ~ - 11t+


H1 [-! : 'j11{ I 'R· ! l 11 1-1! I i
1

II I' I ~ _I1.~,
l 1 I 1.:-i-_
-+-++-l--t---1-1-- --·- -
l-t--!-t-+-+-1-+-+-H-I·-++-+-+-++-+ ~' I
r-.:J+:11·- -1t- l 1 I 1·:-ft
'
1J
:
1: '
I r I
I:
I
1' :
ii I
I
I I 11
t:. I
1' t1
~--, ~HJ q ; ; j jljl 9q ! I i :12 QQ ! \J. ! i ' J-L!~ 0. cq
e-

!
J_
:-:::;:_-:_;:,-+:::;_.-;_f
+--+--+-~-+-
__
--t-lr"'ll.,.,rt--t-

-1-, I - +1 I- n 1'11nt~ru '!!UR~ ~ ~ ! : I : ; I i\\] I ,, ; I I I 1 ; i I


I 1'

r I
Fig. 40c. Variation of rupture strength \ of 5Cr-tMo-Ti
steel with temperature.

167
10
t : - ! f j, [,-1 ~ ! : L I i ' I I ; ; ! I j ! j I J ~ j : I I l
9 T It ; ! 1- I ! ! I I I·-; I l : i-1 I i:
i i I ' 1 .L I !. l ! 1
1
8
r I r ...L - 'I~ ~- .! ;_ TL 1 : - L i' "_/ , ~. ! J-i l 1- :t ! - - . J:. ,- i I i j L-
7 ..

[/)
[/) l
~1 ~~'r" ~: !-t-,( :X- :""!" ii --1-'·- I.+ ·.·r_ It'-
t!8
1 -· 1

9 -;- : ...... t , . '._• ' I I I ---~ f. I I- H--


Fil I I ! :
[/) 8 l" L 1 -1 I

1i 1 I i I
.1
1
;
i ! :--t L t! ! -J __-, J_ --~J T:J -
•••T
i -i.-:- tj
I
:
6 i i ;
1 -·
I\.! 'f H1
5 t ~ :,_ !
1 1; f ! '1 ! j::'_
j :.it
;.1- ·- i -· ii ~- f\_ .,. :\ .
: +
I' \' : . j
1. ;-1 I
I!
4 I' I
'1-:
'- ' i I\: I .
h-+ i :_ ~+ ! :\ f", Ii .I : i'
! \:.
1
, : I: -: ' I '

3
\.: '\-'
'' ''

~
;
-t
r
-:
'. 11;
' -: .
-;.-
i
I I
1-t-
I,
I ..

~- i 1 ~
'~-i!·
'
I
Ii:.
I:
1
I
I!!
!_,
: .
\.!.. \ . ' I i
' : I'
1

1
1
"

:
I

~
I
i
I
I

+; j I \ : ,! ;\i I i1 I ti :-1-
I' I: : ;\: 1:;\
2 ! I·.- I

,_
l

'
·\ '\ '

T(l 0
)11-
og r
)~
x l<""),
Ja
,
!
I'
' I\:.: '
'
i :! ;~_~
I\·
' I i '
Fig. 41. Variation of Larson-Miller creep rate parameter
with stress for 5Cr-iMo-Ti steel.

168
• •
!O __ _
9 __ _
9 __ _
7 __ _
n 1111 i
6 __ _
5 __ _
4 __ _

3_ __

2_ __
,
'~
'~
'~

..,
. -
... ... ...
1~
r~IE 1 '~
. r-..
II"
' I"

I'- o" I' 11'1"1.L 1


• .... !'. r-..
• I' r-.. I'
l __ _ I"
g __
8 __
"
7__
6 __
.....c 5 __
50
I 4 __
1'12
m
13
... __
1'12
,4
--- ·~'4

--
,_ '~

'~

,.
,,
1r
.
,

....
I"
~
I"

r-~
... I'
I

I' r- ... i-.


l__ r.. -, T'- , ...
g_ 10
8_
7_
6_

5_

4_

3_

-- "

,., ,.,,.,
... '"''"'- ..- '" IL IL
" ~.~ " ....
....

L
"M"
"' ...
Pig. ~2. Variation of creep strength of 5Cr- ~Mo-Ti steel
with temperature.

169
1 4 567891 4567891 4 567891 4567891 4567891
1oq
8
7
6

1q 00
8
or! 7
Ill 6
.!ii:
........ I
ti)
0
Ul
~
er:
E-4
ti)

1009 .0
8

TIME FOR RUPTURE - hours


Fi~. 4Ja. Stress vs time for rupture of ?Cr-!Mo steel. The superimposed
curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 46.
4S6?B91 4567891

-.-....
10

RUPTURE - hours
Pig. 4Jb. Stress vs time for rupture for ?Cr-!Mo steel. The superimposed
curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Pig. 46.

-
.....
N

RUPTURE - hours
Fig. 4Jc. Stress vs time-for-rupture for ?Cr-!Mo steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 46.
I 2 3. 567191 2 2 • 567891 •567891 2 • 5 6 7I9I
10~ 100
~'
·~.

:~

10,~ 10
or! ii
m 'I
~ ~
15.
~
(/J
(/J

~
E-<
(/J 1¥

10 iii·; 1
~
'i!
!I;

,;

;i!

L1
0.01 O.l l.O 10
CREEP RATE - per cent per 1000 hourp
Fig, 44a, Stress vs secondary creep rate of 7Cr-tMo steel, The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig, 48,
1 4 5 6 7 8 9J 4567891 4567891
10 ~

CREEP_RATE - per cent per 1000 hours


Fig. 44b. Stress vs secondary creep rate of 7Cr-iMo steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 48.
"'

Fig. 45a. Variation of ductility of ?Cr-iMo steel with time for rupture.
"'

Fig. 45b. of ductility of 7Cr-iMo steel with time for rupture.


N ...
.. N ...

.......,....,

0
... ..

~ f-+t-H+H+itffffl'lfflliii
~ H-tti+Hft+lttttttttlttt
.........
P:: H-lf-tttth!tthHttftttttt
co if H-+++tt+fttttrltttttttt

00
10

ti] 8_ "- -- . - c['' - - - __r r: ' c:t:r' -:J:[. -"'' tcJ_HC'-1 11\ I : -X"'1 _,j -! _ l ! II r l -J- -
<-c<-:,o_- ,- -,,,_;__: W- - ___ J,_~ - ~- _:E -, -._-:fc ,-L 'o:-C[_-j_C:j:, _-f''tc~~l N i _, i _,- -~I _1 I!i ' -. -!- 1--: >=

!~~ 3·~ i : 14 >: :


--11 !: : I
; !'~ :P • T(~O + •og t1 x i:.' ;'I
I
I ' • I
1_

1- I ; -1

:1
I: ! I I

I
Fig. 46. Variation of Larson-Miller rupture parameter
with stress for 7Cr-tMo steel.

180
.. 1- t,1--

-:L -·:r-_ -r

i ~cc<:c ': 'ctj


;-:i= {1'

+~·-1---l-l--+-+-+-l - . -r-'--r-'-'- -t - -+ --1-- +,_


+r
:::::::::=:::::::=:::::::::=::::::~~:::::-~~:;::::::=::::::::::=:::::::=::::::::::=t:::t:::=:::+l-41--l-'_++-,,-+-+-+-+-+-+-,f'- ~~~'--
l-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-"-+-+-k-f'"1-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+--1-+--+--1-+---l-+-+---l-++··i-L--L- _L_1-H- ··-
L - ~ '---~ ~-:'---
- • -:t :J~:.::
L_ - -1-1---+--

- ~~C- _·,_ :t.L. '--'-- ~L_L,.


-~- --t 1---tttttt±tttttttt~11--l=~-C~~

---.:.!-~.

= -~-i :::r;_:1_.:_:1--_ ~-

__ ---.:::-=i=-- ~=
t~ 1-..: -:·: _· __(""

7 ~c. - .J:;'

__ L..::_L- .•

6
- +-
5_
--i----l-'--'-- -
_ _:_- t-t-1-I--

-:-- -_-_ ~- : : rt=


4 r- - --

r-r- -t -~~~ ~~ c_'~-' ' : ' :-,---_ -_:_"


--
- -·-
-
··-
....__ -
~
~
~
1--1--1--
L_l_,__.

f-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+--+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+--!-+-+--t-->--l--l-+-J--l--'--J-!-+-l'-1--+-lf-+-!-L--l--L~L _ - ~

-l--

Fig. 4?a. Variation of rupture strength of •


with temperature.

181
10 __ _

9 ---
..- " - . ·-- .- - -- -·
8 - ---
. ~· -=---+ - ==t:. - r- .:. . - - - - -_. . . .. .. - ~-=

4
+ t-~-- -
-f--

··- -
t--f--t--
3
,..,...

1-+--+--+-•~~---+..i>-+-+--+--+-+--+-+--+--+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+--+-+-+-+-+--+-+--t-+--t-+--f--t-l---tr-~·--t-t-+-+-i--+-t-t---rt-+-+-+--+--+--+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+-+--i
t---t---f-+-t-t--1rll'l.._,,."-,-+-;--+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+--+--+--+--+-+--+-+-+-+-+-t---t-r-+-t-+--r--r-11-;- ,-,-t-- -.-_,_--r-_-r--r-;--i---r+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-<-+-+-+--+-+-+-t-t---t-1

--r~~·-~~~{'l~'H"~lllll1lllll1Tu~~f--·~f--·~·~
~
.t- ~-+·~m~[l~i~~~lill' r- 1-- •-t--t----t-rH

7-

5_

3_

f-+-+---i---Ht--+--l--+--J--l-1--t-t-++-+-+--+-+-+++--lf-+-J-++-1---f--1-+--t-+-+-f--+-+-t-+--l•-~i,:,_ - !'\;-, . I ~ !l11l ft: - -:' ~. ~;~!- =:- - ..


s· -+
,A - •. --
1'1- i ~

2-
i--+-t-++-t--+-t-+-+-+--1--+-+-+--t--+-+++++-+·++-+-1--+++-+++++++-+--+-+-'-
-- - -: . -
-r-~~\"
- -- '
-l ~t -= ~ ~ ~:r-1·
-1
- I
--+ :_ · ~ 1 I:
' - I ,- I t-
f--- t--t-- - -___:<:: --_1 ~,-_":-'\-~I!-' --~--:1-·11- -If f::11--l1f
- -f-- - "
-:_r- ~~
~- - ;
f
- ~
I
I
'
..
.
1-..- -~ I · I·' 1
- - - L ~ Pl>I j-- - - L iJ iJ • -- t<~ J~ 1-
:::_:_:---=--1-t-- t-+--H--_:-+. : r1! ~ ~ ~1I
...•--++-·+_+-+_f---+-,_+f---:+--+:-1-t--+-t----t-r+ rultl l'!_-: l:, I~ -r~ .. / !
--- ---- -t--, f--f--t-=·=--~--tr.. rT++rii ~11f 1 1
Ir-I
--.-f-f---f--f--1Tr----
1
. 1
t---t---t--+-+-+-+-- - - _, -- I- - 1--t· •· - -- - . ' . I \ I tI i I I I l
-f i1:--1iit :i 1 I 1 11 I !
F g. ~7b. Var ation of rupture stren~h of 7Cr-tMo
steel with temperature,

182
10 --
-~>cl·!lil~-~1~=-~~~~~~.~~-~--~~~·~¥--R--~+-rg·~+:,Pl+:q.+:p:'+_'_ P+~G,c~.~W~~~-~-~~4±~~ 1~
- ---~~ :::~~~~==--
_
~ -~.f.t.. --~:;-~- --: ~·: - :_:;: :- .. '.:.:- ·-· t- - . --_- _ _ _ -_,:_r-· -_ ~
- ..=..:---_ 1-=---- re_- - -~:- ,=r--- e.:1C- - .•. 'l~: :: t=
7_ - =- >-:: __ •-::_-.C:.:c=_::c:l=l-~:r---
-- =t-=3=· --- ~ :~
_ _::. __ -- -+\- __...;..:1.·
6 =

5 -- -+-
-= -_.:===~- ~f-
H-
=_:_1= ---r:-+-- I- --~-l--t--1--
-----
1-f---f---

-, t-

3
>---+--+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+--+--+--+-+---+--+-+---+--+--+---+--+--+---+--+--+----t--+-+----++--~ 1
-~=+ - ,
--tl-0°.l~jL~i:l~----i-t---+--f-t-+--+-+-+--+-+-+--+--+---+--+--+--+~-lr---f-
-f_[t_i- -7--H--f----i--+--1 +-e- - --'-r--t---t---+--+--+----t-+--+-+-+--+----+-+-•-+-+-+---+-+--+--
i.--+-+--+--+-+--+--+-+--+--++--+-+--+--+--+-'-+--+--+--+-+---+-+-+---+-+-+----+-+-t-t--t---r- --rl-t-; --;-J-r+ - +
--r---f--- -t-+----r--+--t->--+-+-+--t--<---+---+--+--+--+---+--i

. J.
7 -- t~c=-Cf::!=..C == -- =:c;-::,--= ~ - :'A l 'S-~ 1 .fr' t:'l'='f= .:£f.i~k =FkF" i-t~:± L 1--l 1J.-' - - IL I i --t-- - --- •=
i=: -- : 3 \ f".& :n £c=g ~T'-1~::-Eili•-'__ :1f'!=T :p=f-:t---=-- -:__ ;~ 1 -l= -
6 =:~H=?.::'-':---_: --1" =i'---"='~·ii"fT;+N'~·'~iFL-i~:l' i!~·T rn---t -Lc~.C:f:•ci-_ ',--
- ·~ _,_ ------ t -- NT~- ':N\.C: ! ~:f:_If-' i +:::x :+'!- :t---nE f - i :-:r: :! j
5 __ :i::i::c5--:E=E-litr.--fJUf 'T~ j~ -~~:-;---_ ·;-j·~ -z :t·+~~-j-• t -r--- r--

~.-~.; 1---'~l ~·r-:tr ;: 1 ;'\J ; : ~ ~ : , ;cc : ;::; l U -;: J l:Ti i~ I -~


. ·-1-

- I
t .,
ti.ion:
~ ' ~ \
1200 1400'
I
: '
TEMPERATURE F i I
;:
Fig. 4?c. Variation of rupture strength of ?Cr-!Mo
steel with temperature. -

183
10 __
9

7 __

6 __

5 __

4 __

5_

4_

Variation of Larson-Miller creep rate parameter


with stress for ?Cr-iMo steel.

184
.--.
10 __ _
g __ _
8---
7 __ _
6 __ _
I

-
5 __ _

"---
3 __ _

2---
..
... ""
'I

.....
I~
!'-
l'I.. l'I.. ' l'I
l'I..
l __ _
9 __
8 __ ·1j II
7__
6 __
5 __

"--:

"
""' I" I" ,...
}__
"' 10
~
\
9-
8-
7 -
6 -
5-

3
-
-
-· - - • ~- ~

-
2
--- 2

,.
!\ II
,_
II• llll "' "' 1 I(

tir.IJl\.1u.10 I.I '


- Fig. 49. Variation of creep strength of "'-.. 7Cr- Mo 1
steel with temperature.

185
100

10 00

•.-I
w
.It!

Ul
_. Ul
co
C>
1%l
0:
E-+
Ul

100 0

10

TIME FOR RUPI'URE - hours


Fig. 50a.Stress vs time for rupture of 9Cr-1Mo steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig.
55.
1 4567891 4 s 67891 4567891 4 567891
100~
8
7
6

1019
8
7
..... 6
a> 5
~

...~ 3
ti)

faex: 2
E-t
ti)

.10

10 100 1000 10,000


TIME FOR RUPTURE - hours
Fig. 50b. Stress vs time for rupture of 9Cr-1Mo steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 55.
10

11
o.-4
Ill
~

en
f3Ck:
-i E-<
rn

TIME FOR RUPTURE - hours


Fi~. 50c. Stress vs time for rupture of 9Cr-1Mo steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 55.
1 4567891 4567891 4567891
1009

109 00
•ri 8
Ill
~

..... en
en
~ rq
11::
8
en

CREEP RATE - ner cent per 1000 hours


Fig. 5la. Stress vs secondary creep rate for 9Cr-1Mo steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 55.
-
8

CREEP RATE - per cent per 1000 hours


Fig. 5lb. Stress vs secondary creep rate for 9Cr-1Mo steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 55.
l~

~
1 10
m
~

ro
~
ro
~ ~
8
ro

·1
9
1
8

CREEP RATE - per cent per 1000 hours


Fig. 5lc, Stress vs secondary creep rate for 9Cr-1Mo steel. The super-
imposed curves were computed from the master parameter curve, Fig. 55.
Pig. 52. Variation of rupture ductility of 9Cr-1Mo steel with time.
"' ...

Variation of ductility of 9Cr-1Mo steel with time for rupture.


-
co
UI
. ·io-
."f:_: ·.:

4 __

3__

l~~~~~~~~~~~,~~,,~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l
2

"
,.....
-;:
-- c
1-. -
- ' ' ~~
1- -1-r-1--

0 "'
0 ...
0
""'
fl)

11--
E-4 9 _
EE - -

8_ - : .. - i---:-t-:: - r=

7_ _

6_ ~~

5_

4_

3_

2·---·f----•-.::::l··-f--
~::t+::ttt:!=:t=t=J::t:H=J=t+tl+:j::#:j:::j::t:H-'=f=H'+H=T---l=t-'=°;::;::+_
l-l---1-lH--l-+--l-lH-+--+---i-,H-+--1---+-'H-+-+-+-H- · - - - ·- ·- --
,·~,:_· ··
lf-- R

f---
I- -
-'-

- - - -·-·-~ -
+ff--- -. -
l-l-+--1---1--l-+-+4--+--1-- -l-+--l-lH--1-+-HH-+-+--l-lH-++ >--- l- - - 1--1--1-- i-- - -

LLL...LL...LL...Ll.,..LI-LL...LLLLLLL.LL.Ll.,..L.J...LJ.....J....J....L..JU...JLLJ....J.....L..l.....W..--'-.l.-l....l...J....L--'-'----'-J--'-L.-J....J_-'-'--'---'---'--'--'-'-..J....L-'--'-'--"--'-'
-t --+
Fig, 53, Variation of Larson-Miller rupture parameter
with stress for 9Cr-1Mo steel.

196
E-t 9 _
fl)
8_
I ~ -

E
7

6_

5_

4_
t:

-1- 1111;;:1-·t--

3_

l-l--l-l-l-1-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l--1-l-l-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-~~+-+-+-+-++++++~-~-+-r-r-t--t-'~-~-t-t-r-t·~~- r;-r-~rr~
l-l--l-l-l-1-l--1-l-l-+-+-l-l-l-I-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-~-~~~ 1---~ ~ _,

Fig • .54a. Variation of rupture strength of 9Cr-1Mo •


steel with temperature.

197
9-·
10

7
~
~~

~~ ~E ~~ ~111
~!;;;
"'
~
6

~
5 ~
:::
f-

"" ,,
,- •
I\.

2_ I• '
-f-
"''" -\.
I\. !\.
"'

, ....
1-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-~~i-+--+-+-+-+.~~~+"~~_,...,_-+--l-~-+--+--l--+--l--+--l--+--l-~~4 +-+--+--+--l-++-~-+--l--+--l-~~-+--l--+--l--+--l--+--l--+--l-~-kJ
1--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-•-'+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-~"+-+-+'lol-'~11,.++-++++-++-++-++-++4-
I\.

~8
7
-+--.
..,__•-
6

5 . =:t= - -
- '-
-~
f-

,_ i= Il'-t-t-t--i--f::r~- Tl ·. 1, i: ; I-•- t- •-it


r i ~ l rl J ~ •: Hi·-~
Fl ~ - -

t- -_
' - r ! _I i' '
f-
-l=T 1 I .,
,_,_ --r--i- -
t=-H~+=t=I-
r::;:l
_f:-+-i ,_:
-~->- ~
I
; i.
I
I
,::: :: .
• ' '
I

·I
'

'
'
'
. . ;
• •-t-·•
'


-1-n-·-
: I
i-
~{
I e-L }-t~ II. J.
I ; -
1 1-r-- i i' I
I
-I
-Li='=.L
t-
1
-
~ -i- '-
--
.±±±±±±::f=l
1
·t---1~-+-+->-'-J
~~H+ :=~
t
'.-t
,_ -1-+-
:+ :
• '.
~
-;--,
'; ~
1 -
l I·~ -f - I . ,_:::=:::=r--

--- '[i-t ; r .1 i
I 1 ' ; .. : i
f-1-~H ~if re 00:; : '1~< o~ :_~ . /Pijlq~ Ft-1 ~::1~ ~( -r-1~ I~
1 n_ f tti ; :i: 1 . . . --j ln11:1• 1 ......: :. .
,·i;.q~ PE~·J vru:i ri : ,
1 • , ,
Ii
'

,
i

:
'


. 1· l-1

1 .. 1 1
1
n
= - l '

.
,
,
1
'

, 1
Oji<,
-
t _.-_~tif
1
1 l
l-'-i ,_,_
f-
J-Ll_-'-L.J._J

:::~1,--1,.:11~1~-t!_· :11~•:
l I;, ; ,
:·:1 ::1: !
1::1-11·1:: :1 :;::
~ ~ i i-J - !
1 ; 1 ~ r ! : . • 1 ; f 1 1
i
!
ii 1-~11 ·.=,__:·_
, -
Fig. 54b. Variation of rupture strength of 9Cr-1Mo steel
with temperature.

198
7
--- - . :-::-:==~ ,_t--

- --r- - r- - r-r-r--r- r--r-r-1---


1--r-t--+--r--r--t - r- r- - r- r- r-

'

7_

6_

5_

--->--

3_ 1--+-+--+-l-+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-l-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+-+--+-ti--t-+----+-<>--e-r-+-+-+-

+-+-t--t---r--t-1--+-t--Hr-t--+ t--t-t-t--+-t
-f-4--+--+-+--+-+--+-+--r-+-+- ----~f--

H-++-H-++-t-+-++-t-+-++-t-+-++-t-+-++-+-t-++-+-i-+-+-+-t-++-H-+-+-~ - - 1;----- - -i--r--i--t--r--r-r--t--i--r-r--t--i--r--r--t-+--t---- ,__

1--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-t-+--+-+-t-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-I~
'-+-+-r- ' - - 1-- - · r-- r- -r-+-+--+-+-+-r-t--+--r--r--t-t-t
1-+-+--+-l-+-+--+-1-+-+--+-1--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-1-+-+--+-1-+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-l--+-+-+--+'11...,_+-f- - , ____ - - --r--i--r- - 1-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+-+--+-+--+-1
2

-nm·lllElEmmR'
===
RHWMISE
-
-- -\ --
__ . ---
+-'--+-+--+--+--+-+-+-+--+- l[--r
''~'"''
+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+-+--+-+--+-t-t-+--+-+--+-r-+-+--+--+-+-1\"
- j--
_
___ -
~---1~

=-· ~ ~ - ~ :-:: I~~


':=~=
--
r- r-

-
r-·-f·-
1--
i-- r--1-1-

1-i= ;:::
-· t - r - r - -
-- - -


..
-- -
-----
---f-1-
,__,__
- -:__:: .---+- ~
___ ;_~~-

-~__:::-:--::- : ~,:_ r-: t- j-_:;;_;:_:;::::~_:;-+--+-+--+--+- ------~ f-+-


~9:lE9:lE~>f>E9:lE9:!PJg£lfEt1lE~~fS=ftS~~!ei-r:rst
~ •• ~_.,.~---r
;_=-,-:---~,.H---- - -- _,_,__
'I\ r
--1i
-1\ t__,---r--r--, --r-r-1-

L mm::++mmm::++H+m~~mm1~ .
.. - f- c r-

Pig. 54c. Variation of rupture strength \ of 9Cr-1Mo


steel with temperature.

199
10 __ _

7--~-
6 __

5 __

4 __

3__

..
''

I"
..
''
l_ _ _

9_
8 = I= ===
7_

"" ... ,....

Pig. 55. Variation of Larson-Miller creep rate


parameter of 9Cr-1Mo steel with stress.

200
0
9
8
7
6
5
-
4

2
~ r'I

,..,.. ....
' I' ,"... I' ,... 0<1u

-
~
"'"'I"'~-
~ l'lal l'I~~

L "" " ,...


9
8_
7 -
6_

" " " '~

'' ,,
"

,... "'
I'

I'
,... '
,...

-
1'
L
9 -E " l'I
10
8 - I=
7
6-

5-
5
4

-
c
2- " "
2
"
'
'
I "
I ~-

,_ -·'-·-· "
. 56.
,~

Variation of cree p stren g th of '


l'I.
- 1
Fi g 9 Cr-lMo
steel with temperature. "•

201
Fig. 57. Comparison of yield strength ratios.

202
'h · ·c- +IT 1 ·f+ t oCF~ :.[+ W rr:ti1 m:lf~ t' 1

T_t;; +--. • :t} ~~i.~~~j '.~~. ~· • .~ t #fr~ t i.~ •

~ - •1 • I .....-r: •
.---. ~. 71 ~ .t ~-'.:: t-;- •. : H-; -:- ' : • . -
. ~'"J IH'r t;: :;i:i;: !~/!i! ': +; ·-

,, jf f:;i. lf& S '~ 11 ·il f+:

• ~t-

i;:~ .r ::i
+ ~it~<
:JJ. hi: t·
w :J if ~t;
'+ +1

,,
.....;. t+

't~ ..__: :.: ! :::


. cti ~;ct·
iJ
.._
.
'7-t
rt ;j,
:
..
: m-•
_. ' + ·~ ~~- ~ :11
.. · ;; L~· :4• •· '+ . t

r~ mn- rn q.~:rti 1 -:U=


. 't ::t .:t : +'

f:E "' i '.:'


: 1:rr if
!Ul ·,

"'
'!ft t;;.
tj t fl
I
t
•• +
: : . J • 1:11
'711 ~,,,.
11: 1::1
T
ffLl I' Ii'
. . t
:r:: if.':~.
ll'·I:1·111· . ·1
I . 1 :1 " ;:_!: ::: :: :;: :t ,..
Utt y: ,:;1 ,,,. :: .1: j. "tt''1 :: . :·
:::': :: ...
H : • • · , : ' • · • t:i ,'Ii II • +: I!tj I; " I;;;. · · : ! '. ; : : : IH \i c:I; l · ::;; ~ t l t •• ·.: •: · • • •
Ult +n 1 it; :d i·i 1: :r . 1:1: 11:11 :,· : !t::: 1:: 1:1: 'i 1:::,,::1 :ftt :11 :'I! "' 1 :1:\1•:: ;, 11t'.' ::
.,.. 't :ti• lf!J
+ ,, !:[ ffl :~. "' i[j li_l:
• • •• ' t I i r I Ui ,, I:' 1,: iJ:t....
•• • • 'i' :rJ% H1i
!<j . '!Ii: :!.. !i':H ::;
. ....
1ff t n !'ff tfrl 1H u\YT iT 'H!1tt1 ! :1r '!lit!: i ! \ji ;11! jj! ;IH :1t11:11 i !I :1' 1 ;:i ::;: ::
Fig. 58. Comparison of tensile strength ratios.

203
10 __

-
9
8 __

7 --

6 __

5 __

4 __

3_

_,___ '
f--

2_
"J'
"' ' I\.

'~

"
'" "'
" "'
> '' I\.
l__
I
I > " "' '
9_

8_

7_•

6_

5_

4_

3_

\ I
'
2_ I

-
~-

;--
,_
r-fi
,,t-I ' :

L 1 -i- -- _:~,'l u
+

,_\1 i f-i
i-r ++
'
- · 'l J l ll ll

"J -- -- -~·~:\ IJ[l!; j


- I ,(II
I
Lll(J(

Pig. 59. Comparison of Rupture Strengths (100,000 hours)

204
I~

5_

4_

'
1-+-+-+-++++++-+-+-+--+-+-1--+4-+--H-+-+-+-+-++++++++-+--+-+-1--+4--t-1-+-+-+-+++-+'IHl-~-l--+-+-l--+4-+--1-+-H-+-+-+-+-~~

~tttttttt+++~~~~~~=~~~tttttttt++++~~~~~~~~~ttttttt~~"~~~~~~~~~=~~~tttttt++~.~
,, " If 11 " " .. n1

Pig. 60. Comparison of creep strengths (0.01~ per 1000 hrs)

205
ASTM-ASME specifications for grades of steel included in this evaluation (1974)

207
Specified minim\DD strength

Norn. Product ASME 'Yield Strength Tensile Strength


Com12. (l) Form s12ec. No( 2) Gt'ade ksi MP a ksi MP a

3 Cr - 0.9 Mo Smls. Tube SA-199 T 21 2s.o 172. 60.0 414.


3 Cr - 0.9 Mo Smls. Tube SA-213 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
T 21
3 Cr - 0.9 Mo Smls. Pipe SA-33S p 21 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
3 Cr - 1 Mo Smls. Pipe SA-369 FP 21 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
3 Cr - 1 Mo Plate SA-387 21 cl. 1 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
3 Cr - 1 Mo Plate SA-387 21 cl. 2 4S.O 310. 7S.O Sl7
3 Cr - 1 Mo Forg. SA-336 F 2la 30.0 207. 60.0 414
3 Cr - 1 Mo Forg. SA-336 F 21 4S.O 310. 7S.O Sl7.
3 Cr - 1 Mo Forg. SA-182 F 21 4S.O 310. 7S.O Sl7.

s Cr - ~ Mo Smls. Tube SA-199 T S 2S.O 172. 60.0 414.


s Cr - ~Mo Smls. Tube SA-213 T S 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
s Cr - ~Mo Smls. Pipe SA-33S p s 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
s Cr - ~Mo Smls. Pipe SA-369 FP S 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
s Cr - ~Mo Plate SA-387 S cl. 1 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
s Cr - ~Mo Plate SA-387 S cl. 2 4S.O 310. 7S.O Sl7.
s Cr - ~Mo Forg. SA-336 F S 36.0 248. 60.0 414.
S Cr - ~Mo Forg. SA-336 F Sa so.o 34S. 80.0 SS2.
S Cr - ~ Mo Forg. SA-182 F S 40.0 276. 70.0 483.
S Cr - ~Mo Forg. SA-182 F Sa 6S.O 448. 90.0 620.
S Cr - ~Mo Bolt. SA-193 BS 80.0 SS2. 100.0 690.
S Cr - ~Mo Cast. SA-217 cs 60.0 414. 90.0 620.

(1) As designated by ASME Code


(2) Identical with or similar to corresponding ASTM specification
(3) ·For plates over S in. (12.7 cm), maximum carbon is 0.17 percent

208
Chemical Requirements - percent
c Mn p s Si Cr Mo

.IS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .SO max 2.6S-3.3S .80-1.06
. IS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .so max 2.6S-3.3S . 80-1. 06
.IS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .so max 2.6S-3.3S . 80-1. 06
.IS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .SO max 2.6S-3.3S .80-1.06
. IS max ( 3 ) .30-.60 .03S max .03S max .SO max 2.7S-3.2S .90-1.10
. IS max ( 3 ) .30-.60 .03S max .03S max .SO max 2.7S-3.2S .90-1.10
.ls max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .SO max 2.6S-3.2S .90-1.10
.IS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .SO max 2.6S-3.2S .90-1.10
.ls max .30-.60 .04 max .04 max .so max 2.6S-3.3S .80-1.06

.ls max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .so max 4.00-6.00 .4S-.6S
.ls max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .so max 4.00-6.00 .4S-.6S
.ls max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .SO max 4.00-6.00 .4S-.6S
.ls max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .SO max 4.00-6.00 .4S-.6S
.ls max .30-.60 .04 max .03 max .so max 4.00-6.00 .4S-.6S
.ls max .30-.60 .04 max .03 max .so max 4.00-6.00 .4S-.6S
.ls max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .so max 4.00-6.00 .4S-.6S
.2S max .60 max .04 max .03 max .so max 4.00-6.00 .4S-.6S
.ls max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .so max 4.00-6.00 .44-.6S
.2S max .60 max .04 max .03 max .so max 4.00-6.00 .44-.6S
.10 min 1.00 max .04 max .03 max 1.00 max 4.00-6.00 .40-.6S
.20 max .40-.70 .04 max .04S max .7S max 4.00-6.BO .4S-.6S

209
Specified minimum strength

Nom. Product ASME Yield Strength Tensile Strength


ComE· Form SEec. No Grade ksi MPa ksi Mpa

s Cr - ~ Mo-Si Smls. Tube SA-213 T Sb 30.0 207. 60.0 414.


S Cr - ~ Mo-Si Smls. Pipe SA-33S P Sb 30.0 207. 60.0 414.

s Cr - 12 Mo-Ti Smls. Tube SA-213 T Sc 30.0 207. 60.0 414.


s Cr - ~ Mo-Ti Smls. Pipe SA-33S p Sc 30.0 207. 60.0 414.

7 Cr - ~Mo Smls. Tube SA-199 T 7 25.0 172. 60.0 414.


7 Cr - ~Mo Smls. Tube SA-213 T 7 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
7 Cr - ~Mo Smls. Pipe SA-33S p 7 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
7 Cr - 12 Mo Smls. Pipe SA-369 FP 7 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
7 Cr - ~Mo Forg. SA-182 F 7 40.0 276. 70.0 483.

9 Cr - 1 Mo Smls. Tube SA-199 T 9 2S.O 172. 60.0 414.


9 Cr - 1 Mo Smls. Tube SA-213 T 9 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
9 Cr - 1 Mo Smls. Pipe SA-33S p 9 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
9 Cr - 1 Mo Smls. Pipe SA-369 FP 9 30.0 207. 60.0 414.
9 Cr - 1 Mo Forg. SA-182 F 9 ss.o 379. 8S.O S86.
9 Cr - 1 Mo Cast. SA-217 c 12 60.0 414. 90.0 620.

210
Chemical Requirements - percent
c Mn p s Si Cr Mb

.lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max 1.00-2.00 4.00- 6.00 .4S-.6S
.lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max 1.00-2.00 4.00- 6.00 .4S-.6S

.12 max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .SO max 4.00- 6.00 .4S-.6S
.12 max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .SO max 4.00- 6.00 .4S-.6S

.lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .S0-1.00 6.00- 8.00 .4S-.6S
.lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .S0-1.00 6.00- 8.00 .4S-.6S
.lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .S0-1.00 6.00- 8.00 .44-.6S
. lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max . S0-1.00 6.00- 8.00 .44-.6S
. lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max . S0-1.00 6.00- 8.00 .44-.6S

.lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max .2S-l.OO 8.00-10.00 . 90-1.10
.lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max . 2S-1. 00 8.00-10.00 .90-1.10
.lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max • 2S-l. 00 8.00-10.00 .90-1.10
.lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max • S0-1. 00 8.00-10.00 .90-1.10
.lS max .30-.60 .03 max .03 max . S0-1.00 8.00-10.00 .90-1.10
.20 max .3S-.6S .04 max .04S max 1 ..00 max 8.00""10.00 .90-1.20

211

Potrebbero piacerti anche