Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Jose Lemus
Professor Granillo
English 103
17 May 2019
Savage is a word, not a people. Movies have been a source of entertainment since they
were created. Movies will always change so the audience can have something new to look
forward to. The story of movies are not the only things that change, the mindset of people
making movies also change especially when it comes to divers concepts. Colonialism has been a
very important part of American history. The colonist had many prejudices against the native
people and some of the beliefs they held towards the natives continues to be part of society
today. Disney uses Pocahontas to per sway its audience that the differences between people do
not have to lead to violence, instead it shows how easily people are able to be persuaded. The
movie targets a young audience that can not possibly understand the great diversity of this topic,
children have not been exposed or taught enough of what happened between the colonist and the
native people. Although the movie does show a story with a happy ending it is not that easy to
undue years of hatred, because of the tragedies between the colonist and the people who were
native to the new land. By viewing the movie through a Postcolonial criticism and Marxist lens ,
it gave an explanation of why, the colonist were so ready to fight the native people. The colonist
viewed as an inferior people, and willing to attack them if it meant them becoming wealthy,
which has lead to the descendants of the native people being misrepresented in today's world.
Lemus !2
Movies should instead tell the true history of the start of America in stead of covering it up with
child tales, but also children should learn about what really happened.
Pocahontas is a movie that takes place in a time where England was traveling to the new
world to find gold and riches. It uses pathos to connect with audience to show that love can
conquer all problems. The colonist were ready to attack the native people of the new land in
order to get the resources they want. One of the people that came from England is John Smith, he
is ready to battle the native people, he has experience fighting people who he deems savage, this
changes when he meets Pocahontas. She is a native of the land they seek to conquer, she
convinces John not to fight her people, but Ratcliffe the main antagonist wants a battle. By
working with each other they are able to bring peace. This film is targeting a young audience.
Native Americans have misrepresented through the beginning of America. They were
seen as uneducated and savage. There are not many effective ways that people try help teach
other to respect people who are different. There needs to be new way to help understand people
Postcolonial criticism has been an important part of many nations history. In the book
The Location of Cultural Bhabha Homi who is a theorist on Postcolonial criticism he speaks on
how the difference of skin can lead to racism, "Skin, as the key signifier of cultural and racial
difference in the stereotype, is the most visible of fetishes, recognized as 'common knowledge' in
a range of cultural, political and historical discourses, and plays a public part in the racial drama
that is enacted every day in colonial societies." (Bhabha 112). The difference of color is a mainly
used when defying a certain cultural. What they define a culture is not accurate when they solely
Lemus !3
define them on only differences. This has been a practice done by many people. In the movie
Close to the end of the movie Pocahontas, there is a scene where stereotyping and
othering can be seen taking full effect. Governor Ratcliffe, who is the main instigator for starting
the war, tries to make the people who are native to the land as enemies and inhuman, "What can
you except from filthy little heathens here's what you get when races are diverse, their skins are
hellish red, they're only good when dead, they're vermin as I said, and worse, barely even human.
(Pocahontas 01:03:51-04:08). In the movie Ratcliffe compares the native peoples skin as hellish.
Hell on its is depicted as something terrible, when matched with the skin color of the native
people, Ratcliffe is saying they are also bad. In the movie skin color opens door for racism to
become more powerful than it already is, after he talks about their skin he also mention they are
vermin and barely human. In this scene the audience is also able to see how easy it was for
Ratcliffe to turn the other colonist against the native people and film them with hatred. Due to
their audience being young they will probably not understand why Ratcliffe hates the native
people or how he got the other colonist to join him in a war, they will mostly just remember that
is was a song in a children's movie. Differences of cultural is one of the most easiest way's to
The film helps to expose how differences can be seen as a great excuse to start conflict.
While In the film the people arriving to the new world see the native people as savages, Tyson
explains how othering can weaponize these differences, "The practice of judging all who are
different as less than fully human is called othering, and it divides the world between "us" (the
"civilized") and "them" (the "others," the "savages")." (Tyson 401) Othering has been used many
Lemus !4
times when colonizing a new land, when America was first discovered, the colonist used othering
to justify the force they used against the people who were already there. When colonizing other
lands people have slaughtered innocent people, they have destroyed homes, and destroyed the
land. These acts can weigh heavily on a person, by using othering they too justify what they have
done, if they believe the violence they showed was on people that was uncivilized and lesser than
them, they might think they were doing a great service, that these people needed to be attacked.
The effect of these path occurrences is that people were decedents of the native people continued
to stereotyped and have had unjust things done to them. These stereotypes have rooted
Ratcliffe character is controlled by his hatred for the natives for being different, he
embodies the idea of othering, In this scene he talks about the native, people. "Lies, Lise, all of
it! Murderous thieves; there's no room for their kind in civilized society." ( Pocahontas
00:53:45-53:5) The movie shows how viewing differences in a bad way can escalate to violence.
This film shows a lot of hatred and racism. It shows othering at its core. Ratcliffe's hatred is
exposed to the audience and also to the other colonist in the film, instead of them telling him he's
wrong they begin to agree with him, once again it shows how people can become manipulated.
Not alone were the colonist easily influenced to hate the Native people because of the their
differences and Ratcliffe's influence, but also by their desire to become rich and wealthy.
The middle class has always had to go through tough circumstances which had made
their lives harder and willing to except any task that would help enrich their lives. In the Marx's
book The Communist Manifesto, he explains how working in factories are destroying the
bourgeois(middle class). Marx explains how the bourgeois are working in a slave like
Lemus !5
environment, “Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois State; they
are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the over-looker, and, above all, by the
individual bourgeois manufacturer himself”. (Marx 21) Karl Marx is speaking about how during
his time how people were controlled by working. If a person is not wealthy enough they may put
themselves into these conditions. During the time of the exploration of the new world, the
colonist were also put in harsh conditions. They put in bad conditions such as being on a ship for
a long amount of time. In the begging of the film the audience is able to see the harsh ships of the
voyage from England to the new world. (Pocahontas 00:1:48-03:42) They were put in a
dangerous just getting to the place where they believed the gold to be. Even though none of the
crew lost their lives in reality, not all the crew were that lucky. Due the middle class being in
repressive environments, they have no problem repressing the people who were native to the
land the explored. In a new land that they new nothing about except there might be people there
who they will most likely have to fight. To get out from there low status in life, the colonist in
the movie were willing to do what they thought it took to become wealthy. Though it may not be
the movies intention it shows the audience how important wealth and make them fear the idea off
being unhealthy.
In the name of wealth great devastation has occurred. Tyson helps explain this Marxism
idea, "Rugged individualism, which, as we have seen, is a cornerstone of the American dream, is
an ideology that romanticizes the individual who strikes out alone in pursuit of a goal not easily
achieved, a goal that often involves risk and one that most people would not readily
undertake." (Tyson 57) When a person is desperate and wants to get ahead in life they might be
willing to do destructive actions. In the film people were willing to travel to a new land being
Lemus !6
fully aware that they will have to fight and kill the people who called the lands the colonist
invaded home. In the movie there was several times that the colonist spoke of killing the native
people who stood in front of their wealthy future. In American culture wealth has been an
important concept, as it has in the beginning of America. In the film rugged individualism, is
shown by the many people eager to go to the new land. Like in the movie, people who went on
these voyages were driven by the idea that great things will come to them if they went on this
journey, that the new land will give them new opportunities, they felt that they may not have any
more options, they were willing to put their life on the line for a small source of hope that they
will be able to find riches and opportunities in this new land. The film helps expose this
repressive ideology.
The promise of wealth was seen as a way to a better future. The song played in this scene
helps explain why people went to the new world, "In 1607, we sail the open seas, for glory, God
and gold, and the Virginia Company. For the New World is like heaven, and we'll all be rich and
free, or so we have been told by the Virginia Company." (Pocahontas 00:00:11-00:33) In the
movie Pocahontas, gold was the main motivation for the colonist to go to this journey. They
were willing to do anything to get to the gold they were promised. In the song it "says we'll be
rich and free", they may also feel that they are trapped by the low status they live in; That if they
are Abel to get the wealth they were promised, they will no longer feel like lesser people. Like in
the movie, in real life people are always trying to escape from there life if they are not wealthy or
feel repressed. They are willing to put their needs over anyone else. The audience only sees men
willing to put their life's on the line just for the promise of gold. Due to the destruction caused by
Lemus !7
the pursuit of wealth and the irrational descriptions of the native people. America has given the
In the past history of the film industry, stereotyping of Native Americans was alive well.
This quote from the article Native Americans: The Surprising Silents, helps explain why movies
that empowered Native Americans were appealing, "Unfortunately, these silent Indian-theme
films failed to change dominant cultural values, and they could not withstand the demand for
cowboy-and-Indian attacks by the late 1930s in Westerns..." (Aleiss) Due to reasons such as
people being manipulated to believe the worst possible ideas about a person, the racism that was
started in the beginning of America, has lived and is living in America. If people were taught that
Native Americans were savages they are going to see them as savage. Like Pocahontas some
movies were unaffected to end the racism towards the Native Americans. People are content to
The colonist and there kin have kept the idea of Native American being savage through
out generation. The stereotypes put on people who were considered native Americans have been
put in films, "Unquestionably, most Hollywood Westerns tell us more about white attitudes and
beliefs than they do about Native American customs and values." (Lahti) This article talks how
native Americans in movies are perceived by white society, and because of this they were not
well represented some concepts about native Americans in films would be offensive. When the
colonist first got to the new world, they did not deemed it important to understand the culture of
the people who already lived there. This has cause the, misrepresentation not only seen in real
life but also in the movie Pocahontas. The colonist have never met the people of the land or
Lemus !8
studied their culture. Instead they deemed them as savage. It is no surprise that in movies The kin
of the native people are also seen as savages and looked as that way.
Disney has tried to make a movie that disrupts and destroy these
old stereotypes, but it is not that persuasive. Disney uses the character Pocahontas to show that
there can always be peace. "Look around you, this is where the path of hatred has brought us.
This is the path I choose, father. What will yours be?" (Pocahontas 01:07:59-08:11) In this scene
Pocahontas protects John Smith. During this scene war is about to break out, because of the
anger the colonist and Pocahontas's tribe have towards each other. The film shows two very
different people from different cultures being to get along, after all the violence. While this may
be a heart warming ending it does not help to explain to their young audience why these
stereotypes are bad but most importantly what they can do to stop this. The factions have hated
each other so deeply, that it does not seem realistic that Pocahontas and John Smith's feeling for
each other, would have stopped the war. The movie does not give realistic solutions to solve
The movie Pocahontas helps elaborate and explain what led to the violence in the
beginning of colonizing of the new land, but ineffective on showing what actions should be taken
to end the false interpretations of Native Americans. Through the Marxist and Postcolonial lens,
the audience is able to see how stereotyping and how the urge to be wealthy has led to
destruction, which has caused American society to falsely recognize and understand the native
Americans and their descendants. Throughout the movie chaos and violence can be seen because
of hateful thinking. Due to the audience being young and unaware of the the topic, this makes
this movie ineffective. It might not be correct for children to understand the hatred and racism
Lemus !9
present in today's society, but they should be taught want really happened between the colonist
Works Cited
Aleiss, Angela. Native Americans: The Surprising Silents. Cineaste, Version 3, Cineaste
Publishers, JSTOR
Goldberg, Eric. Pocahontas. Gabriel, Mike, Disney, June 23, 1995. Netflix
Lahti, Janne. Silver Screen Savages: Images of Apaches in Motion. The Journal of Arizona
Marx, Karl. The Communist Manifesto. Public Domain, Jan 1, 1848, pg21
Tyson, Lois. Postcolonial criticism. Critical Theory Today, 3rd Edition, Routledge, pg401, pg57