Sei sulla pagina 1di 11

Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141

Anatomical changes due to uptake and accumulation of


Zn and Cd in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)
B.B. Maruthi Sridhar a,b , S.V. Diehl a , F.X. Han c , D.L. Monts b,c , Y. Su b,∗
a Department of Forest Products, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
b Diagnostic Instrumentation and Analysis Laboratory (DIAL), Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
c Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA

Accepted 21 June 2004

Abstract

Anatomical and physiological changes in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) plants due to uptake and accumulation of Zn and
Cd were investigated. Potted plants were exposed to metal treatments of Zn and Cd for 15 and 16 days, respectively. Leaves,
stems and roots were harvested for studying anatomy and analyzing metal accumulation. Anatomical changes were documented
using light microscopy, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy. Accumulation of Zn and Cd in all parts of the plant
increased significantly with an increase in applied metal concentration. Microscopic studies revealed clotted depositions in roots
and stems, break down of parenchyma cells, and a decrease in starch content in leaves of plants treated with high concentrations
of Zn. Physiological and morphological changes of Zn-treated plants included a significant decrease in relative water content,
dry weight and plant height. Cd at higher concentrations resulted in structural changes only in stems and roots. Mustard plants
accumulated significant amounts of Zn and Cd without exhibiting symptoms of phytotoxicity. However, higher Zn (ZnT3 and
ZnT4) and Cd (CdT4) concentrations resulted in structural changes in roots, stems and leaves and altered physiological and
morphological characteristics. Our results systematically illustrate the physiological implications of structural alterations caused
by Zn and Cd at higher concentrations.
© 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Anatomy; Brassica juncea; Cadmium; Microscopy; Phytoremediation; Zinc

1. Introduction as mining and smelting of metalliferous ores, electro-


plating, fertilizers and pesticides (Raskin and Ensley,
Over many years, Zn and Cd contamination has built 2000). Zn is widely used in the paint, rubber, dye and
up in the environment from industrial activities, such wood preservative industries (ATSDR, 1994) while Cd
is mainly used in batteries, metal coatings and plastic
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 662 325 3286; industries (Raskin and Ensley, 2000; ATSDR, 1999).
fax: +1 662 325 8465. Both Zn and Cd often combine with other elements at
E-mail address: su@dial.msstate.edu (Y. Su). hazardous waste sites to form compounds of chlorides,

0098-8472/$ – see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.06.011
132 B.B.M. Sridhar et al. / Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141

oxides and sulfides (ATSDR, 1994, 1999). These con- and anatomical characters of mustard plants were eval-
taminants move into the soil and remain persistent for uated with reference to their Zn and Cd phytoextraction
long periods of time by binding strongly to soil parti- potential. The main objective of our study was to iden-
cles. Excess Zn and Cd in soil cause adverse human tify the structural and ultrastructural changes caused
health effects, animal fatalities, and the disruption of by Zn and Cd accumulation in leaves, stems and roots
the natural ecosystems (Brown et al., 1994). of mustard plants; and to correlate the metal accumula-
Phytoremediation is a cleanup alternative where tion with anatomical, physiological and morphological
plants are used to degrade, extract, contain or immobi- changes.
lize contaminants from soils and water (Raskin and En-
sley, 2000). For effective phytoremediation of metals
they must be translocated and accumulated in the aerial 2. Materials and methods
parts of the plant. Progress of metal phytoextraction is
limited by metal uptake and translocation efficiency 2.1. Plant culture and phytoremediation
within different plant parts. In non-hyperaccumulator experimental design
plants, Zn accumulation is localized as globules in
roots of Deschampsia caespitosa (Van Steveninck et The mustard seeds were a commercial variety ob-
al., 1987), electron dense granules in roots of Betula tained locally. The soil used for the pot study was
pendula (Denny and Wilkins, 1987) and as globules in Miracle-Gro Potting Mix from Miracle-Gro Lawn
leaves of Lemna minor (Van Steveninck et al., 1990). Products Inc. (Marysville, OH). The seeds were sown
Among hyperaccumulators Zn is localized as globular in plastic pots, each containing approximately 2.0 kg
crystals in the roots and leaves of Thlaspi caerulescens of potting mix. The plants were kept outdoors in an
(Vazquez et al., 1994, 1992a; Kupper et al., 1999; Keller enclosed area except during extreme weather condi-
et al., 2000). Accumulation and localization of Cd oc- tions. The seedlings were thinned to two plants per
curred as electron dense granules in roots of Agrostis pot at the 2–3-leaf stage. Modified Hoaglands Nutri-
gigantean and Zea mays (Rauser and Ackerley, 1987), ent solution (Hoagland and Arnon, 1950) was sup-
as cell wall deposition in roots of Z. mays (Khan et al., plied to the plants daily, after the plants attained
1984) and in roots of bush bean plants (Vazquez et al., 3–4 leaves. The composition of the nutrient solution
1992b). was 0.5 mM Ca(NO3 )2 , 3.1 mM NH4 NO3 , 0.01 mM
Uptake and accumulation of metals at higher con- KH2 PO4 , 50.0 ␮M KCl, 0.2 ␮M CuSO4 , 12.0 ␮M
centrations can be cytotoxic in some plant species, H3 BO4 , 0.1 ␮M NiSO4 ·6H2 O, 2.0 ␮M MnSO4 ·H2 O,
causing structural and ultrastructural changes affecting 0.5 ␮M ZnSO4 ·7H2 O, and 0.2 mM MgSO4 . Metal
the growth and physiological well being of the plants treatments with six replicates in each group were
(Barcelo et al., 1988; Zhao et al., 2000; Vazquez et al., supplied with 2 mM (ZnT1), 10 mM (ZnT2), 50 mM
1992a; Han et al., 2004). Zn hyperaccumulation results (ZnT3), and 100 mM (ZnT4) of Zn solution, supplied
in a decrease in mesophyll cell size in Arabidopsis hal- as ZnSO4 ·7H2 O; 50 ␮M (CdT1), 500 ␮M (CdT2),
leri (Zhao et al., 2000) while Cd accumulation causes a 2.5 mM (CdT3), and 10 mM (CdT4) of Cd solution,
break down of chloroplasts in bush bean plants (Barcelo supplied as CdCl2 .
et al., 1988) and decreases plant growth in Brassica All the treatment groups along with control (T0)
juncea (Haag-Kerwer et al., 1999). were arranged in a completely randomized design. The
Indian mustard has been identified as a high biomass metal treatment at the rate of 100 ml pot−1 day−1 was
producing plant with the capacity to accumulate Zn and started at 5 weeks after plants emerged. The metal
Cd at higher concentrations in plant cells (Kumar et treatments were supplemented with nutrient solution
al., 1995; Salt et al., 1995). With in this context, the to avoid any water and nutrient deficiencies. Fifteen
physiology, morphology and anatomical characteris- days after the start of metal treatment, all the Zn treated
tics of mustard plants are important. It is also important groups were harvested, except the ZnT4 group is har-
to study the structural changes in different plant parts vested 4 days earlier because of severe phytotoxicity
to understand the overall process of phytoremediation. symptoms. Since large number of samples were col-
Hence in this study the physiological, morphological lected for microscopic study, the Cd treated groups
B.B.M. Sridhar et al. / Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141 133

were harvested 16 days after the start of metal treat- mens were critical point dried through carbon dioxide,
ment (1 day later than most of the Zn treated groups). mounted on stubs, and coated with gold–palladium. All
materials were observed with a LEO SEM.
2.2. Procedure for microscopic study
2.2.3. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Stem and root samples of 5 mm length were ex- Stem and root segments of approximately 3 mm
cised from 2 cm above and 2 cm below the stem–root length were collected for transmission electron mi-
intersection, respectively. Leaf samples of 5 mm length croscopy (TEM). The samples were fixed in 2.5% glu-
were excised from the middle portion of the third leaf taraldehyde in 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH
(lower leaf) from the base of the plant. The leaf, stem 7.1) for 8 h, and post fixed with OsO4 . The samples
and root samples were prepared for light microscopy were dehydrated in an ethanol series and embedded in
(LM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and trans- Spurrs epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections were obtained
mission electron microscopy (TEM). All the samples using an ultramicrotome and stained with uranyl ac-
were excised and quickly immersed in H2 S saturated etate and basic lead citrate for observation under JEOL
water as pretreatment for 30 min at room temperature TEM (Johansen, 1940).
to precipitate Cd and Zn (Khan et al., 1984). The sam-
ples were immediately fixed in formaldehyde acetic 2.3. Chemical analysis
acid (FAA) saturated with H2 S water for LM and in
glutaraldehyde for SEM and TEM studies. The plants were cut about 2 cm above the soil level,
upper leaves, lower leaves, stems and roots were har-
2.2.1. Light microscopy (LM) vested, and the roots were washed with de-ionized wa-
The plant samples were alcohol dehydrated, paraffin ter and the samples were dried at 80 ◦ C in an oven for
embedded, ultramicrotomed and subjected to different 48 h for chemical analysis. Among the total 6–7 leaves
stains including sulfide-silver to localize the Cd and Zn of the plant, the first three leaves counting from the base
in stem samples and with potassium iodide (KI) to vi- of the plant were considered as lower leaves and the rest
sualize the starch content (Sass, 1958) in leaf samples. as upper leaves when collecting leaves for chemical
For the sulfide–silver method, the LM stem sections analysis. Dry leaves, stems and roots were then ground
embedded in paraffin were microtomed to obtain four and weighed. Plant samples (approximately 0.5 g) were
microsections, placed on glass slides, cleaned in citri- digested with concentrated HNO3 and H2 O2 (Jackson,
solve, and dehydrated in an ethanol series. The sections 1958). The digested solution was filtered and then an-
were then treated in developer solution in the dark at alyzed for Zn and Cd concentration using inductively
22 ◦ C for 1 h. Finally they were washed in an ethanol coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-
series, counter stained with 2% safranin and then de- AES) (Han and Banin, 1997).
hydrated and mounted (Pearse, 1972).
2.4. Measurements and statistical analysis
2.2.2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Leaf, stem and root samples were also prepared The plant heights from the root–stem intersection to
for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Stem sam- the growing tip of the stem were measured at the end
ples of approximately 5 mm length were collected from of the experiment. The fresh weights and dry weights
2 cm above the stem–root intersection. The procedures of the upper leaves, lower leaves and stems were ob-
for collection of leaf and root samples remain the tained using an electronic balance. The relative wa-
same as described for light microscopy. All the sam- ter content (RWC) of the plants were obtained using
ples were immediately fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde the formula (Fresh weight–Dry weight)/Fresh weight.
in 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.1) for 8 h Statistical analysis was conducted with SAS statistical
(Sass, 1958; Johansen, 1940), and then dehydrated in software (SAS Institute Inc. NC). The GLM procedure
an ethanol series. The samples were sealed in parafilm, was used for the analysis of different metal treatments,
frozen in liquid nitrogen and fractured transversely with means separated by Duncans multiple range test at
using a pre-cooled knife. The cryofractured speci- p < 0.05. The CORR procedure was used for correlation
134 B.B.M. Sridhar et al. / Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141

analysis with means separated at p < 0.05. Least signif- (Table 1). Cd also accumulated significantly in leaves,
icant difference (LSD) was used for comparisons be- stems and roots with higher applied metal concentra-
tween the treatment means. tions (CdT3 and CdT4) (Table 2). The Cd accumulation
in leaves and stems are close to the accumulation in
roots in the CdT1- and CdT2-treated groups (Table 2)
3. Results whereas the CdT3- and CdT4-treated groups showed a
higher concentration in roots followed by lower leaves,
3.1. Effect of Zn and Cd accumulation on plant upper leaves and stems. The dry weight and plant height
growth decreased for CdT4-treated plants compared to control
plants – T0 (Table 2). The metal accumulations listed
Mustard plants grew steadily in all of the Zn- and in Tables 1 and 2 was based on the dry weight basis of
Cd-treated groups and chlorosis was not visually ob- harvested plant material.
served during the treatment process except in higher Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to
Zn-treatment groups (ZnT3 and ZnT4) towards the end identify the effect of metal accumulation on the phys-
of the experiment. General side effects of metal treat- iological and morphological characters of the plant.
ment included stunted growth with an increase in metal Zn accumulation showed significant (p < 0.01) nega-
concentration. The Zn accumulation in leaves, stems tive correlation with plant dry weight and highly sig-
and roots increased significantly with an increase in nificant (p < 0.001) negative correlation with RWC and
applied metal solution concentration (Table 1). Zn ac- plant height (Table 3). Among the different plant parts
cumulation increased almost linearly in all plant parts, analyzed, Zn accumulation in stem was significantly
resulting in high Zn concentration in roots followed by negatively correlated to the RWC (r = −0.94*** ) and
stems, lower leaves and upper leaves (Table 1). The plant height (r = −0.74*** ). Cd-treated plants showed
dry weight, relative water content (RWC), and plant (p < 0.01) negative correlations with only plant dry
height significantly decreased for ZnT4-treated plants weight (Table 4).
Table 1
Averaged Zn accumulation in upper leaves, lower leaves, stems and roots (in mg kg−1 dry weight), shoot dry weight, relative water content
(RWC), and height of plants treated with Zn (n = 6) at the end of the experiment
Treatment Upper leaf Lower leaf Stem con- Root con- Dry RWC (%) Height (cm)
concentration concentration centration centration weight (g)
T0 82 c 76 c 91 c 72 c 11.7 a 91 a 12.8 cb
ZnT1 326 c 348 c 437 c 318 c 12.8 a 89.1 a 18.2 a
ZnT2 1073 cb 1311 c 1790 c 1541 c 11.9 a 90.2 a 15 b
ZnT3 3022 b 4388 b 10523 b 10953 b 12.1 a 83.6 b 11 c
ZnT4a 7280 a 8190 a 15807 a 16482 a 5.9 b 81.3 b 6.7 d
Means followed by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level, grouped into classes a, b, c and d.
a ZnT4 group was harvested 4 days earlier than other Zn-treated groups.

Table 2
Averaged Cd accumulation in upper leaves, lower leaves, stems and roots (in mg kg−1 dry weight), shoot dry weight, relative water content
(RWC), and height of plants treated with Cd (n = 6) at the end of the experiment
Treatment Upper leaf Lower leaf Stem con- Root con- Dry weighta RWCa (%) Heighta (cm)
concentration concentration centration centration (g)
T0 3c 7b 4.8 c 1.3 b 11.7 91.0 12.8
CdT1 24 c 55 b 32 c 32 b 12.3 90.0 13.2
CdT2 90 bc 163 b 145 cb 134 b 13.4 91.1 14.2
CdT3 271 b 512 b 303 b 520 b 10.7 91.5 13.3
CdT4 1037 a 1850 a 1125 a 4530 a 8.1 90.6 10.8
Means followed by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level, grouped into classes a, b and c.
a Not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level.
B.B.M. Sridhar et al. / Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141 135

Table 3
Correlation coefficients between Zn concentrations in root, stem, lower leaf and upper leaf (in mg kg−1 dry weight) and plant characters: dry
weight, relative water content (RWC) and plant height (n = 6)
Plant characters Root concentration Stem concentration Lower leaf concentration Upper leaf concentration
RWC −0.91*** −0.94*** −0.87*** −0.85***
Dry weight −0.42** −0.50** −0.45** −0.39**
Plant height −0.64*** −0.74*** −0.66*** −0.64***
** Significant at <0.01 probability level.
*** Significant at <0.001 probability level.

Table 4
Correlation coefficients between Cd concentrations in root, stem, lower leaf and upper leaf (in mg kg−1 dry weight) and plant characters: dry
weight, relative water content (RWC) and plant height (n = 6)
Plant characters Root concentration Stem concentration Lower leaf concentration Upper leaf concentration
RWC −0.06 0.04 0.11 0.07
Dry weight −0.45** −0.46** −0.52*** −0.41
Plant height −0.44 −0.38 −0.54*** −0.28
** Significant at <0.01 probability level.
*** Significant at <0.001 probability level.

Fig. 1. SEM micrographs showing the transverse section of lower leaves of control (A and C), ZnT4-(B) and CdT4-(D) treated plants. The
leaves of ZnT4-treated plants show the breakdown of epidermal, palisade and spongy parenchyma cells resulting in a decrease in intercellular
spaces compared to the control (T0) plants (A) by 11th day of metal treatment. The changes in CdT4-treated (D) leaves were less significant
compared to control (T0) leaves by 16th day of metal treatment. Note: ZnT4-treated plants were harvested 5 days earlier than Cd-treated plants,
hence different controls (T0) were used here.
136 B.B.M. Sridhar et al. / Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141

Fig. 2. Light micrographs showing the transverse section of control (A and C) and ZnT4-treated (B and D) leaves stained with potassium iodide.
The leaves were sampled on the 7th (A and B) and 12th day (C and D) after starting the ZnT4-treatment. The starch appears as black to dark
brown spots in the leaf. Note: the decrease in starch content in the ZnT4-treated leaves from 7th day (B) to 12th day (D) after starting the metal
treatment compared to control (T0) leaves.

3.2. Effect of Zn and Cd accumulation on plant For leaves of Cd-treated plants (Fig. 1D), the changes
structural changes in epidermal and mesophyll cells were not significant
compared to the control (Fig. 3C) by 16th day of metal
The Zn-treated plants showed gradual changes in treatment. The ZnT4-treated plants also show a de-
leaf structure with an increase in metal concentration. crease in starch content by seventh day (Fig. 2B) of
The ZnT3 and ZnT4 groups showed significant fo- metal treatment compare to the control plants (Fig. 2A).
liar structural changes compared to the control group The starch content appears as black to dark brown spots
(T0). The SEM micrographs of leaf samples showed in the transverse section of leaves stained with potas-
a reduction in the palisade and epidermal cells of the sium iodide. The starch content was significantly re-
ZnT4 group (Fig. 1B) compared to the control group duced by the 12th day of the treatment (Fig. 2D) com-
(Fig. 1A) by 11th day of metal treatment. The leaves of pared to the control group (Fig. 2C), indicating an inhi-
ZnT4-treated plants also show a breakdown of spongy bition in the formation and accumulation of starch with
and palisade parenchyma cells (Fig. 1B) followed by uptake of Zn at higher concentrations. The starch con-
further loss of cell shape and decrease in intercellu- tent was compared qualitatively based on microscopic
lar spaces compared to the control group (Fig. 1A). observations only.
B.B.M. Sridhar et al. / Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141 137

Fig. 3. Light micrographs showing the transverse section of stems of control (A and C), ZnT4 (B) and CdT4 (D) treated plants sampled on the
last day of metal treatment and stained with sulfide–silver for localization of Zn and Cd. The Zn (B) and Cd (D) precipitates were seen as black
deposits along the walls of xylem and phloem vessels compared to clean control-T0 (A and B) stems. Also note the increased black depositions
in ZnT4 (B) treated stems compared to CdT4 (D) treated stems. Note: ZnT4-treated plants were harvested 5 days earlier than Cd-treated plants,
hence different controls (T0) were used here.

Light micrographs of ZnT4 – (Fig. 3B) and CdT4 along the cell walls of vascular bundles compared to the
– (Fig. 3D) treated stems showed Zn and Cd precip- control (T0) group (Fig. 4A) by the end of metal treat-
itates as black deposits along the walls of xylem and ment period. These clotted depositions increase from
phloem vessels compared to their respective controls ZnT3 – (Fig. 4B) to ZnT4 – (Fig. 4C) treated plants.
(Fig. 3A,C) by 11th and 16th day, respectively. The The precipitates were more intense in Zn-treated plants
transverse section of the stems were pretreated with (ZnT3 and ZnT4) compared to CdT4-treated plants
H2 S to precipitate metal contents and stained with (Fig. 4D). In control group (Fig. 4A), the clotted de-
sulfide–silver for localization of Zn and Cd. The metal positions were not observed along the cell walls of the
precipitates were seen as black deposits on the safranin vascular bundles. TEM observations of the sulfide fixed
background. The ZnT4-treated stems showed thick root sections showed black electron dense depositions
black depositions along the walls of xylem and phloem along the cell walls of ZnT4-treated plants (Fig. 5B).
vessels (Fig. 3B). In CdT4-treated stems (Fig. 3D), The black depositions were not observed in the cell
the black depositions were not uniform, but were seen walls (Fig. 5A) of the roots of control group (T0). The
along the walls of vascular bundles. roots of CdT4-treated plants show an increase in the
The SEM micrographs of sulfide fixed root samples number of vacuoles (Fig. 5C) and precipitation along
from ZnT3 – (Fig. 4B), ZnT4 – (Fig. 4C) and CdT4 – the cell walls, when compared to the cross sections
(Fig. 4D) treated groups show precipitates binding all of control roots (Fig. 5A). The increase in number of
138 B.B.M. Sridhar et al. / Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141

Fig. 4. SEM micrographs of transverse sections of roots of control-T0 (A), ZnT3 (B), ZnT4 (C) and CdT4 (D) treated plants sampled on the
last day of metal treatment. The SEM micrographs showed clotted depositions along the cell walls of vascular bundles in ZnT3 (B), ZnT4 (C)
and CdT4 (D) treated plants compared to control (A).

vacuoles is seen in both epidermal and cortex cells of ZnT2-treated groups show no significant changes in dry
CdT4-treated plants. weight, RWC, and increase in plant height compared
The stems of ZnT4-treated plants (Fig. 6B) show to the control (T0) group, suggesting that mustard has
thickened cell walls in both xylem and phloem vessels, a high tolerance and uptake ability for Zn. Kumar et al.
which were not seen in control group (Fig. 6A) by the (1995) suggested that 100 mg l−1 of Zn concentra-
end of metal treatment period. The TEM micrographs tion was not phytotoxic to B. juncea when added
of the sulfide fixed stems of ZnT4-treated plants show to a soil mixture. However, at higher concentrations
electron dense depositions along the cell walls of xylem (ZnT3 and ZnT4), the plants show significant changes
and phloem vessels (Fig. 6C). These depositions, inten- in physiological and morphological characters, such
sively stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, were as reduction in RWC, dry weight and plant height
seen deposited along the phloem vessels (Fig. 6D). All (Table 1).
the plant sections were treated with H2 S to precipitate Apart from these physiological and morphologi-
their respective metal contents. cal changes, Zn accumulation also results in structural
changes in leaves, stems and roots. Structural changes
in leaves include shrinkage of epidermal, palisade and
4. Discussion spongy parenchyma cells and a decrease in starch con-
tent and RWC. The Zn accumulation in stems of ZnT4-
Our study shows that Zn-treatments at higher con- treated plants were seen as depositions in light mi-
centrations results in a linear increase in metal accu- crographs and as electron dense depositions along the
mulation in roots followed by stems, lower leaves and walls of vascular bundles in TEM micrographs. Sim-
upper leaves. Since Zn acts as a growth promoting ilar electron dense depositions were also observed all
micronutrient at lower concentrations, the ZnT1- and along the cell walls in TEM micrographs of their roots.
B.B.M. Sridhar et al. / Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141 139

either simple salts of Zn or large organic molecules


such as proteins and carbohydrates complexes
with Zn.
Most of these studies did not correlate the metal ac-
cumulation or structural changes to physiological and
morphological changes. In our study, we found that
at higher Zn concentrations (ZnT3 and ZnT4) an ex-
cess deposition of Zn resulted in decreased translo-
cation or uptake of metals and water from roots and
stems to leaves. This is confirmed by the significant
decrease in RWC (Table 1) and by the high nega-
tive correlation of RWC with Zn accumulation in the
stems (r = −0.94*** ) and roots of Zn-treated plants
(r = −0.91*** ).
In the case of Cd-treated plants at higher concen-
trations, metal accumulation was higher in roots fol-
lowed by lower leaves, stems and upper leaves. No
significant changes in RWC, dry weight, and plant
height at lower concentrations for Cd-treatment groups
(CdT1, CdT2 and CdT3) suggest the applied levels
of Cd were within the tolerance limit. This is consis-
tent with mustard being a Cd accumulator (Kumar et
al., 1995; Salt et al., 1995). However, due to signifi-
cant metal accumulation in the CdT4-treated plants, the
cross sections of roots showed precipitation and an in-
crease in the number of vacuoles in TEM micrographs
of roots (Fig. 5) and as black depositions in light mi-
crographs of stems (Fig. 3). The Cd accumulation also
results in a decrease in dry weight and plant height in
CdT4-treated plants, confirming again that Cd affects
the growth of plants at higher concentrations. This is
in accordance with the studies of Haag-Kerwer et al.
(1999) that Cd accumulation resulted in a decrease in
growth rate and reduction in transpiration of mustard
plants.
Fig. 5. TEM micrographs of transverse section of roots of ZnT4 Mustard plants can accumulate significant amounts
(B), CdT4 (C) treated plants along with control-T0 (A) sampled
on the last day of metal treatment. Electron dense depositions
of Zn and Cd without showing phytotoxicity or reduc-
are seen along the walls of root cells in ZnT4 (B) treated plants tion in plant growth when the environmental metal
compared to control (A). The roots of CdT4 (C) treated plants concentrations are relatively low. However, higher
and depositions showed vacuoles and depositions along the cell Zn and Cd concentrations will result in structural
walls. changes in roots, stems and leaves and altered phys-
iological and morphological characters. Our study
presented here documented some of the physiolog-
Several studies verified these precipitations and depo- ical implications of structural alterations caused by
sitions as compounds of Zn through X-ray probe mi- Zn and Cd due to metal uptake, translocation and
croanalysis (Van Steveninck et al., 1987, 1990; Denny accumulation. We believe that our results on the
and Wilkins, 1987; Vazquez et al., 1994, 1992a; Kup- localization patterns and their effect on plant struc-
per et al., 1999). These depositions were found to be tural, morphological and physiological characteris-
140 B.B.M. Sridhar et al. / Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141

Fig. 6. SEM micrographs of transverse section of stems of ZnT4-treated plants (B) showed thickened cell walls compared to control-T0 (A).
TEM micrographs of ZnT4-treated plants showed electron dense depositions along the walls of vascular bundles (C) in transverse section of
stem and along phloem vessels (D) in longitudinal section of the stem. The plants were sampled on the last day of metal treatment.

tics will contribute to understand and optimize the References


processes of phytoremediation of Zn and Cd by mus-
tard plants. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1994. Toxicolog-
ical profile for zinc. Available from U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA. CAS
No. 7440-66-6.
Acknowledgements Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1999. Toxico-
logical profile for cadmium. Available from U.S. Department of
We acknowledge Mr. Dharmendra K. Singh, Mr. Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA.
CAS No. 7440-43-9.
Cheng Wang, Mr. Shyam S. Balasubramaniam, and Barcelo, J., Vazquez, M.D., Poschenrieder, C., 1988. Cadmium in-
Mr. Thomas W. Hallmark, for their contributions to duced structural and ultrastructural changes in the vascular sys-
data collection and plant culture activities. The au- tem of bush bean stems. Bot. Acta 101, 254–261.
thors thank Ms. Yunju Xia, Mr. Dean Patterson, and Brown, S.L., Chaney, R.L., Angle, J.S., Baker, A.J.M., 1994. Phy-
Dr. Thomas Meaker of DIAL for their help in chem- toremediation potential of Thlaspi caerulescens and bladder cam-
pion for zinc- and cadmium-contaminated soil. J. Environ. Qual.
ical analysis. We also thank Mr. Richard F. Kuk- 23, 1151–1157.
linski, Mr. William A. Monroe, Ms. Kay N. Milam Denny, H.J., Wilkins, D.A., 1987. Zinc tolerance in Betula spp. mi-
for expert assistance in microscopy; Ms. Amanda M. croanalytical studies of zinc uptake into root tissues. New Phytol.
Lawrence for help in sample processing, providing 106, 525–534.
Microtome and other accessories; and Dr. Gary W. Haag-Kerwer, A., Schafer, H.J., Heiss, S., Walter, C., Rausch, T.,
1999. Cadmium exposure in Brassica juncea causes a decline in
Lawrence for providing the knife holder. This work transpiration rate and leaf expansion without effect on photosyn-
was supported by funding from U.S. Department of En- thesis. J. Exp. Bot. 50, 1827–1835.
ergy through Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-98FT- Han, F.X., Banin, A., 1997. Long-term transformations and redis-
40395. tribution of potentially toxic heavy metals in arid zone soils.
B.B.M. Sridhar et al. / Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 (2005) 131–141 141

I. Under saturated conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 95, 399– Rauser, W.E., Ackerley, C.A., 1987. Localization of cadmium in
423. granules within differentiating and mature root cells. Can. J. Bot.
Han, F.X., Maruthi Sridhar, B.B., Monts, D.L., Su, Y., 2004. Phy- 65, 643–646.
toavailability and toxicity of trivalent and hexavalent chromium Salt, D.E., Prince, R.C., Pickering, I.J., Raskin, I., 1995. Mechanisms
to Brassica juncea L. Czern. New Phytol. 162, 489–499. of cadmium mobility and accumulation in Indian mustard. Plant
Hoagland, D.R., Arnon, D.I., 1950. The water-culture method for Physiol. 109, 1427–1433.
growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stat. Circular, Sass, J.E., 1958. Botanical Microtechniques. Iowa St. University
347. Press, Ames.
Jackson, M.L., 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Van Steveninck, R.F.M., Van Steveninck, M.E., Fernando, D.R.,
Jersey. Wells, A.J., 1990. Zinc tolerance and the binding of zinc as zinc
Johansen, D.A., 1940. Plant Microtechniques. McGraw-Hill, New phytate in Lemna minor X-ray microanalytical evidence. J. Plant
York. Physiol. 137, 140–146.
Keller, B.C., Zinold, K., Schulin, R., 2000. Distribution of zinc Van Steveninck, R.F.M., Van Steveninck, M.E., Fernando, D.R.,
in functionally different leaf epidermal cells of the hyperac- Horst, W.J., Marshner, H., 1987. Deposition of zinc phytate in
cumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Cell Environ. 23, 625– globular bodies in roots of Deschampsia caespitosa ecotypes: a
687. detoxification mechanism. J. Plant Physiol. 131, 247–257.
Khan, D.H., Duckett, J.G., Frankland, B., Kirkham, J.B., 1984. Vazquez, M.D., Barcelo, J., Poschenrieder, C.H., Madico, J., Hat-
An X ray microanalytical study of the distribution of cad- ton, P., Baker, A.J.M., Cope, G.H., 1992a. Localization of zinc
mium in roots of Zea mays L. J. Plant Physiol. 115, 19– and cadmium in Thlaspi caerulescens (Brassicaceae), a metal-
28. lophyte that can hyperaccumulate both metals. J. Plant Physiol.
Kumar, P.B.A.N., Dushenkov, V., Motto, H., Raskin, I., 1995. Phy- 140, 350–355.
toextraction the use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Vazquez, M.D., Poschenrieder, C.H., Barcelo, J., 1992b. Ultrastruc-
Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 1232–1238. tural effects and localization of low cadmium concentrations in
Kupper, H., Zhao, F.J., McGrath, S.P., 1999. Cellular compartmen- bean roots. New Phytol. 120, 215–226.
tation of zinc in leaves of the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caer- Vazquez, M.D., Poschenrieder, C.H., Barcelo, J., Baker, A.J.M., Hat-
sulescens. Plant Physiol. 119, 305–311. ton, P., Cope, G.H., 1994. Compartmentation of zinc in roots and
Pearse, A.G.E., 1972. Histochemsitry Theoretical and Applied. leaves of the zinc hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens J&C
Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore. Presl. Bot. Acta 107, 243–250.
Raskin, I., Ensley, B.D., 2000. Phytoremediation of Toxic Met- Zhao, F.J., Lombi, E., Breedon, T., McGrath, S.P., 2000. Zinc hy-
als: Using Plants to Clean the Environment. Wiley, New peraccumulation and cellular distribution in Arabidopsis halleri.
York. Plant Cell Environ. 23, 507–514.

Potrebbero piacerti anche