Performance Indicators

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory

QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and
clearly the clear communication of clear
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs,
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders,
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as
shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV

were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters

Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services various related performed various performed various performed various
works/activities related related related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
process as shown process as shown process as shown
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory RENE E. BASBAS LOURD
below 1.499 Poor Ratee
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely showed No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
prompt and clear evidence was
communication of shown
the learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the given MOV evidence was
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable

was completed in evidence was
only 1 quarter shown

Rarely performed No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.400

various related evidence was
work/activities that shown
contribute to the
teaching learning
process as shown
in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

Very Satisfactory 4.486
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

LOURDES R. PABITO TEDIE A. DE VERA

Rater Principal III
 Objectives Weight Quality
Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory

5 4 3 2
KRA 1 Objective 1 Applied knowledge of 7.50% Showed Showed Showed Showed
content within and across knowledge knowledge knowledge knowledge
curriculum teaching of content of content of content of content
areas. and its and its and its and its
integration integration integration integration
within and within and within and within and
across across across across
subject subject subject subject
areas as areas as areas as areas as
shown in shown in shown in shown in
MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4

Objective 2
Objective 3
Objective 4
Objective 5
Objective 6
Objective 7
Objective 8
Objective 9
 Performance Indicators
Quality Efficiency
Very
Poor Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Rating Satisfactory

1 5 4 3 2 1
No 5 Submitted Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted No
acceptable at least 4 lessons lessons any 1 of the acceptable
evidence Why? lessons using MOV using MOV given MOV evidence
was shown using MOV 1 and 1 and was shown
Average COT Ratings is 7 Outstandaing 1 and supported supported
Average COT Rating is 6 VS supported by any 1 of by any 1 of
Average COT Rating is 5 Satisfactory by any 1 of the other the other
Average COT Rating is 4 Unsa the other given MOV given MOV
Average COT Rating is 3 Poor given MOV
ators
Efficiency Timeliness
Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Rating Satisfactory Rating
5 4 3 2 1
5 Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No N.A.
MOV were MOV were MOV were MOV was acceptable
Why distributed distributed distributed completed evidence
across 4 across 3 across 2 in only 1 was shown
At Least 4 MOV's were submitted Oustanding quarters quarters quarters quarter
3 MOV's were submitted VS
2 MOV's were submitted S
1 MOV was submitted UNSA
Non-Submission of MOV Poor
AVERAGE SCORE

5 0.375
 KRA'S COT 1
1. Applies knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas 6
2. Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy
skills
6
3. Applies a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other
higher-order thinking skills
6

4. Manages classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful

exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning environments
6

5. Manages learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure
learning-focused environments
6
6. Uses differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners' gender,
needs, strengths, interests and experiences
6
7. Plans, manages and implements developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to
meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts
6
8. Selects, develops, organizes, and uses appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT,
to address learning goals
9. Designs, selects, organizes, and uses diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies
consistent with curriculum requirements
Total Average 6.00
COT 2 COT 3 COT 4 RATING REMARKS
7 7 7 6.75 O
6 6 7 6.25 O

6 6 7 6.25 O

7 7 7 6.75 O

7 7 7 6.75 O

7 6.50 O

7 7 6.67 O

7.00 7.00 7.00 O

7 7.00 O
6.71 6.71 7.00 6.66 O
 Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated Applied differentiated
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies
Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5
gender, needs, rating of 6
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated
experiences. 7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
meet curriculum
requirements and
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
varied teaching
7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally
contexts.
sequenced sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Applied No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
differentiated evidence was
teaching strategies shown
to address learner
diversity as shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Submitted any 1 No acceptable

differentiated evidence was
teaching strategy in shown
only 1 lesson as
evidently shown in
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV

Planned and No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375

implemented evidence was
developmentally shown
sequenced
teaching and
learning process as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
developmentally evidence was
sequenced shown
teaching and
learning process as
evidently shown in
any 1 of the given
MOV
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) S
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: RENE E. BASBAS Name of Rater:

Position: Teacher III Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Urdaneta City Division Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018 - April 2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical Rating

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective
Q E T
Objective 1 7.5% 5 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 5
Objective 3 7.5% 5 5
Objective 4 7.5% 5 5
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5 5
Objective 6 7.5% 4 5
Objective 7 7.5% 5 5
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 3
Objective 9 7.5% 5 4
Objective 10 7.5% 5 3
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 4 4
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 3
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5
F
Adject

RENE E. BASBAS LOURDES R. PABITO

Ratee Rater
NT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Proficient Teacher)

LOURDES R. PABITO
Head Teacher III

Numerical Ratings
Score
Ave
5.000 0.375
4.500 0.337
5.000 0.375
5.000 0.375
5.000 0.375
4.500 0.337
5.000 0.375
3.500 0.262
4.500 0.337
4.000 0.300
4.500 0.324
3.667 0.275
5.000 0.500
Final Rating Outstanding
Adjectival Rating 4.547

TEDIE A. DE VERA
Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OU

Performance Indicators
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Results
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective No acceptable
Education Knowledge and applications of content applications of applications of content applications of content applications of evidence was shown
Services Pedagogy knowledge within and content knowledge knowledge within and knowledge within and content knowledge
across curriculum within and across across curriculum across curriculum within and across
teaching areas. curriculum teaching teaching areas as teaching areas as curriculum teaching
areas as shown in shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of a rating of 7 a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of
8 5

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable
lessons as evidenced as evidenced by MOV as evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 evidence was shown
by MOV 1 and 1 from colleagues and 1 from colleagues and from colleagues and
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
the other MOV given the other MOV given the other MOV given the other MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable
Education colleagues in the completed and completed action research with research with evidence was shown
Services conduct and disseminated action research with colleagues colleagues
application of research research with colleagues
to enrich knowledge of colleagues
content and
pedagogy. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of the Submitted any 2 MOV Submitted any 1 No acceptable
7.5% of the given MOV acceptable MOV MOV evidence was shown

Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report within research report within research report within research report within evidence was shown
the rating period the rating period the rating period the rating period
 Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report within research report within research report within research report within evidence was shown
the rating period the rating period the rating period the rating period

Performance Indicators
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight
QET Results
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable
Education Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was shown
Services Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to promote strategies to promote strategies to promote strategies to promote
promote critical and critical and creative critical and creative critical and creative critical and creative
creative thinking, as thinking, as well as thinking, as well as thinking, as well as thinking, as well as
well as other higher- other higher-order other higher-order other higher-order other higher-order
order thinking skills. thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 8 a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted 4 or more Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable
lessons as evidently as evidently shown in as evidently shown in evidently shown in evidence was shown
shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported
supported by any 1 of by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other by any of the other
the other MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality Modeled and shared Modeled and shared Modeled and shared Modeled and shared No acceptable
Education Environment and colleagues to model effective classroom effective classroom effective classroom effective classroom evidence was shown
Services Diversity of and share effective management management management management
Learners techniques in the strategies that engage strategies that engage strategies that engage strategies that engage
management of learners in activities/ learners in activities/ learners in activities/ learners in activities/
classroom structure to tasks done in different tasks done in different tasks done in different tasks done in different
engage learners, physical learning physical learning physical learning physical learning
individually or in environments as environments as environments as environments as
groups, in meaningful shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
exploration, discovery a rating of 8 a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5
and hands-on
activities within a 7.5%
range of physical
 exploration, discovery a rating of 8 a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5
and hands-on
activities within a 7.5%
range of physical
learning
environments.environ Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
ments. lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of evidence was shown
MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the other and any 1 of the other the acceptable MOV
the other acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Results
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable
Education Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence was shown
Services Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior management behavior management behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills by skills by applying skills by applying management skills by
positive and non- applying positive and positive and non- positive and non- applying positive and
violent discipline to non-violent discipline violent discipline to violent discipline to non-violent discipline
ensure learning- to ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning- to ensure learning-
focused environments. focused environments focused environments focused environments focused environments
shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 8 a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5
7.5%

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable
the given strategies the given strategies as the given strategies as given strategies as evidence was shown
as observed in at observed in 3 lessons observed in 2 lessons observed in only 1
least 4 lessons lesson

Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable
Education colleagues to share colleagues at least in colleagues in the colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was shown
Services differentiated, the district/cluster department or grade evidence of sharing evidence of sharing
Basic 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable
Education colleagues to share colleagues at least in colleagues in the colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was shown
Services differentiated, the district/cluster department or grade evidence of sharing evidence of sharing
developmentally level to share lesson level to share lesson with others with others
appropriate
opportunities to
address learners’ Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
differences in gender, 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson, as evidenced evidence was shown
needs, strengths, shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and by either MOV 2 or 3
interests and supported by any supported by any supported by any but no evidence of
experiences. acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV sharing with others

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Education Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was shown
Services strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
developmentally and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process
sequenced teaching as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
and learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
processes to meet
curriculum 7.5%
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 lessons Submitted 1 lesson as Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable
varied teaching lessons as evidenced as evidenced by evidenced by shown evidenced by any 1 of evidence was shown
contexts. by MOV 1 and 2 and MOV 1 and 2 and in MOV 1 and/or 2 the acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of and supported by any
the other acceptable the other acceptable 1 of the other
MOV MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable
Education Planning colleagues, teacher participated in collaborative reviews collaborative reviews collaborative reviews evidence was shown
Services and learner feedback LACs/FGDs/meetings of teacher and learner of teacher and learner of teacher and learner
to plan, facilitate and to discuss feedback as feedback as feedback as
enrich teaching teacher/learner evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the
practice. feedback to enrich MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
instruction as shown
in the MOV submitted

7.5%
 7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
collaborative reviews collaborative reviews collaborative reviews collaborative review of evidence was shown
of teacher and learner of teacher and learner of teacher and learner teacher and learner
feedback as evidently feedback as evidently feedback as evidently feedback as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in any of the
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of acceptable MOV
the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently advised Frequently advised Occasionally advised Rarely advised No acceptable
Education colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the evidence was shown
Services selection, selection, selection, selection, selection,
organization, organization, organization, organization, organization,
development and use development and development and development and development and
of appropriate appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning
resources, including resources as shown in resources as shown in resources as shown in resources as shown in
ICT, to address the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
specific learning goals. 7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 teaching Submitted 2 teaching Submitted 1 teaching No acceptable
teaching and learning and learning and learning and learning resource evidence was shown
resources as resources as resources as as evidenced by any
evidenced by at least evidenced by at least evidenced by at least of the acceptable
1 of the acceptable 1 of the acceptable 1 of the acceptable MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently reviewed Frequently reviewed Occasionally reviewed Rarely reviewed No acceptable
Education and Reporting collaboratively with collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively evidence was shown
Services colleagues to review assessment tools with assessment tools with assessment tools with assessment tools with
the design, selection, colleagues as shown colleagues as shown colleagues as shown colleagues as shown
organization and use in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
of a range of effective
diagnostic, formative
and summative 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment strategies
assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as evidence was shown
consistent with
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
curriculum
any of the acceptable any of the acceptable any of the acceptable any of the acceptable
requirements.
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable
Education and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with with colleagues in the evidence was shown
Services monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the interpretation of
evaluation strategies interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of assessment data as
of attainment data to assessment data as assessment data as assessment data as shown in the MOV
support learner shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
progress and 7.5% submitted submitted submitted
achievement.
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 of Submitted at least 2 of Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different types of MOV the same kind of MOV the same kind of MOV the MOV evidence was shown

Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently applied Frequently applied Occasionally applied Rarely applied skills in No acceptable
Education effective skills in the effective skills in the effective skills in the effective the effective evidence was shown
Services communication of communication of communication of communication of communication of
learner needs, learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and
progress and progress to parents/ progress to parents/ progress to parents/ progress to parents/
achievement to key guardians as shown guardians as shown in guardians as shown in guardians as shown
stakeholders, 7.5% in the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
including
parents/guardians. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 MOV Submitted any 2 MOV Submitted any 1 MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently performed Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
Education related works/activities performed special special tasks and/or performed special special tasks and/or evidence was shown
Services that contribute to the tasks and/or assignments as tasks and/or assignments as
teaching-learning assignments as shown in the MOV assignments as shown in the MOV
process. shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted
10%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable MOV evidence was shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MARY ARNEL B. ANGWAY TEDIE A. DE VERA ROSAR
below 1.499 Poor Master Teacher I Principal II Asst. Schools
AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
 Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
 Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Rating
Ave Score
 Ave Score
Q E T
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
 ROSARIO O. CABRERA
Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IP
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teache

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numeric

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER

Ratee Rater
REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority
 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Action Plan
(Recommended Developmental
Development Intervention) Resources
Strengths Timeline
Needs Needed
Learning Objectives Intervention
A. Functional Competencies

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Feedback:

PEDRO V. PAROCHA, JR.

Teacher III