FACULTY OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY

LAB SHEET

ERGONOMICS & HUMAN FACTORS

EME 3186

TRIMESTER 3 (2018/2019)

LAB 1 EHF 1 Sound Level Measurement

LAB 2 EHF 2 Illumination Level Measurement

Note: Students are advised to read through this lab sheet before doing experiment.
PROGRAMME OUTCOMES

PO PO statement

PO2 Apply technical competence in specialised areas of engineering discipline

to the solution of complex engineering problems (WK1-WK4).

PO3 Identify and analyse complex engineering problems, and formulate

solutions based on fundamental principles of science and engineering

PO4 Design solutions for complex engineering problems that meet specified
needs with relevant considerations of their impacts in society

PO8 Understand and evaluate sustainability in professional engineering

solutions to complex engineering problems, and their impacts in societal
and environmental contexts (WK7).

EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-2

LEARNING OUTCOMES

LO LO statement

LO1 Formulate how information can approach humans and how information is
processed, how limitation of human body (biomechanics, anthropometry) affect
the design of products and services (cognitive – creating, level 6).
LO2 Evaluate how environment affects humans (noise, climate, lighting, motion,
hazardous substances) and how additional limitations render from there
(cognitive - evaluating, level 5).
LO3 Design for moving body and how to handle loads properly (cognitive - creating,
level 6).

LO4 Analyse how proper arrangement of controls and displays enhance work
sensation (cognitive - analysing, level 4).
LO5 Demonstrate how office environments should be designed in order to maximize
work efficiency (workstation, office arrangement, information setup at visual
display terminal) (cognitive - applying, level 3).

MAPPING OF ASSESSMENTS TO LEARNING OUTCOMES & PROGRAMME

OUTCOMES

PO2 PO3 PO4 PO8

LAB 1 x

LAB 2 x

LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

LAB 1 x

LAB 2 x

EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-3

Lab Report Evaluation
CATEGORY Excellent
POINT RANGE 10 to 9
Introduction The introduction is inviting,
states the main topic and
previews the structure of the
report.
Documentation - Details are placed in a
logical order and the way
Presentation of
they are presented
Report / data / effectively keeps the interest
analysis
of the reader.
Analysis and Appropriately and precisely
used of data and
Results
assumptions for analysis
demonstrated
understanding of students
and give the reader
important information that
goes beyond the obvious or
predictable.
Discussions and Clear and effective
explanation detailing the
Recommendations
interpretation of data which
supported the
recommendations give the
reader important information
that goes beyond the
obvious or predictable.
Summary / The conclusion is strong
and leaves the reader with a
Conclusion
feeling that they understand
what the writer is "getting at."
Note: Please attach this rubrics marking scheme at the SECOND page of your lab report for LAB 1 and LAB 2 respectively.
Good
8 to 7
The introduction clearly
states the main topic and
previews the s tructure of
the paper, but is not
particularly inviting to the
reader.
Details are placed in a
logical order, but the way
in which they are
pres ented/introduced
sometimes makes the
writing less interesting.
Provided clear and
supporting details (e.g.
data, ass umptions) and
analys es are relevant,
but one key issue or
portion of the work is not
clearly presented.
A clear explanation and
appropriately used of
data to support
recommendations.
The conclusion is The conclus ion is
recognizable and ties up recognizable, but does not conclusion, the report just
almost all the loose tie up several loose ends. ends.
ends.
Fair
6 to 5
The introduction states the
main topic, but does not
adequately preview the
structure of the paper or
particularly inviting to the
reader.
Some details are not in a
logical or expected order,
and this distracts the
reader.
Supporting details (e.g.
data, assumptions) and
analyses are relevant, but
several key issues or
portions of the work are not
clearly presented.
Incomplete explanation
and/or recommendation or
explanation not clearly
presented (e.g. out of topic,
miss ing steps or
information).
There is no clear
Poor
Selected
4 to 0 Weight Total Point
Point
There is no clear
introduction of the main
topic or structure of the
report. 5
Many details are not in a
logical or expected order.
There is little sense that
the writing is organized.
15
Supporting details (e.g.
data, as sumptions) and
analyses are typically
unclear or not related to
the topic. 50
No explanation and
recom mendation, or the
explanation could not be
understood, or was 20
unrelated to the task /
cas e study.
10
TOTAL 100
EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-4
LAB 1

EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-5

EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-6
EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-7
EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-8
EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-9
LAB 2

EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-10

EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-11
EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-12
EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-13
EME 3186/UN/T3-2019/2020, page-14