PEOPLE VS. JUAN DELA CRUZ Firstly, an action could only be enforced as against a person.

ction could only be enforced as against a person. prevails, or if the doctrine has already been superseded
G.R. NO. 12345, JANUARY 1, 2019
(ALL CAPS ANG LETTERS FOR EASY VISIBILITY DURING
RECITATIONS. DELETE ALL WORDS IN COLOR RED AS YOU
FINALIZE YOUR DIGESTS.)
Juan dela Cruz killed the Pope. And when the Pope rose
from the dead, he sought revenge against Juan by casting a spell
where his children, and his children’s children, would grow a
pussy.
Juan sued the Pope for a crime which he did not name what.
The Pope filed for a motion to quash the information on the
ground that said information did not constitute the offense.
The case was dismissed by the RTC.
1. Did Juan have any cause of action against the Pope?
NO.
Firstly, an action could only be enforced as against a person.
The Pope in this case, rose from the dead. He is not a person, but
a monster! Hence, he does not possess any juridical capacity to
be sued.
Second, the averments in the information did not constitute
any offense. As the Spice Girls put it: So tell me what you want
what you really really want???
The Pope in this case, rose from the dead. He is not a person, but
a monster! Hence, he does not possess any juridical capacity to
be sued.
Second, the averments in the information did not constitute
any offense. As the Spice Girls put it: So tell me what you want
what you really really want???
NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT TO INDENT EACH PARAGRAPH.
PEOPLE VS. JUAN DELA CRUZ
G.R. NO. 12345, JANUARY 1, 2019
(ALL CAPS ANG LETTERS FOR EASY VISIBILITY DURING
RECITATIONS. DELETE ALL WORDS IN COLOR RED AS YOU
FINALIZE YOUR DIGESTS.)
Juan dela Cruz killed the Pope. And when the Pope rose
from the dead, he sought revenge against Juan by casting a spell
where his children, and his children’s children, would grow a
pussy.
Juan sued the Pope for a crime which he did not name what.
The Pope filed for a motion to quash the information on the
ground that said information did not constitute the offense.
The case was dismissed by the RTC.
by a more recent case.
 Please always check and see whether the discussion in
your digest is actually connected with the topic your
case is under. READ YOUR DIGESTS BEFORE YOU EVEN
SUBMIT THEM.
 It is okay to just copy and paste the digest you found
online, but please DOUBLE CHECK THEM WITH THE
ACTUAL CASES. THERE HAVE BEEN MANY INSTANCES
WHEN THE RULING IN THE DIGEST IS DIFFERENT FROM
THE ACTUAL RULING IN THE ORIGINAL CASE. WORSE,
THE RULING IN THE DIGEST DO NOT CONNECT WITH
THE DIGESTED FACTS.
 We may refer to the digests we made during our Consti
1 and 2, pero dapat we should be cautious na and
double check.

NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT TO INDENT EACH PARAGRAPH.
PEOPLE VS. JUAN DELA CRUZ
G.R. NO. 12345, JANUARY 1, 2019
(ASSUMING THAT YOU WANT TO PRESENT THE FACTS IN
BULLETED FORM, DO IT THIS WAY)
 Juan dela Cruz killed the Pope. And when the Pope rose
from the dead, he sought revenge against Juan by
casting a spell where his children, and his children’s
children, would grow a pussy.
 Juan sued the Pope for a crime which he did not name
what. The Pope filed for a motion to quash the
information on the ground that said information did
not constitute the offense.
 The case was dismissed by the RTC.
2. Did Juan have any cause of action against the Pope?
NO.
3. Did Juan have any cause of action against the Pope?
NO.
Firstly, an action could only be enforced as against a person.
The Pope in this case, rose from the dead. He is not a person, but
a monster! Hence, he does not possess any juridical capacity to
be sued.
Second, the averments in the information did not constitute
any offense. As the Spice Girls put it: So tell me what you want
what you really really want???
NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT TO INDENT EACH PARAGRAPH.
READ ME!
 Always include the citation and the date when the case
was promulgated. This is to ensure that we have
reference should we want to inquire more about the
case, or see whether the doctrine in the case still

1|Page