Module

LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE

MANAGEMENT LCHM01-8
NQF LEVEL 8

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT – ASSIGNMENT

LCHM01-8/S1 06/2019

Due Date 9 April 2019

Exam Date 5 June 2019

Marks 100

© Milpark Leadership and Change Management LCHM01-8 Assignment 9 April 2019 Page 1 of 8
 Assignment (LCHM01-8/S1 06/2019)

Assignment code: Assignment (LCHM01-8/S1 06/2019)

Assignment due date: 9 April 2018
Exam date: 5 June 2018

Please note that this assignment (9 April 2019) is directly linked to the exam
being written on 5 June 2019 and should only be completed and submitted if you
are writing your exam on this date.

Total: 100 marks

Note

You will be penalised for copying theory without explanation/application to the

scenario provided. You should use the theory in support of your own answer.
Non-application will result in a zero mark being awarded.

SECTION A (100 MARKS)

In preparation for answering the question, read the article under: https://www.-
dailymaverick.co.za/article/2018-07-24-sa-to-lead-by-example-as-it-welcomes-a-
world-of-leaders-not-all-of-them-democratic/

After reading the article, research at least five (5) other relevant and valid BRICS
and global leadership articles.

You have been asked to present a training module on a comprehensive set of

leadership qualities needed in the BRICS environment.

Develop the module, and present the detailed content – in writing – to a panel
of experts for review.

Your assignment may not exceed ten typed pages (Arial 12, 1½ spacing),
excluding the title, content and reference list pages.

© Milpark Leadership and Change Management LCHM01-8 Assignment 9 April 2019 Page 2 of 8
Your assignment must contain the following elements:

• Title page
• Table of contents
• Introduction
• Content of the training programme on leadership
• Summary and recommendations
• List of sources – you should reference at least five (5) sources
• Appendices (if required)

Total: 100 marks

© Milpark Leadership and Change Management LCHM01-8 Assignment 9 April 2019 Page 3 of 8
 Marking rubric
Very Poor Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0–16% 17–33% 34–49% 50–65% 66–83% 84–100%
Structure There is no There is The answer is The answer has The answer is The answer is
structure in the insufficient poorly structured been structured, properly well structured
The answer answer. It is structure in the and difficult to but a more structured with in every
must be impossible to answer and it follow. formal approach an introductory respect,
properly follow. is almost would have part, a core making it
structured. impossible to made it easier to discussion and a easier to
follow. follow. conclusion. digest.
10 marks 0-1 2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10
Editing There is no There is little The text has not The text needs The text has The text is an
evidence that the evidence that been edited some editing. It been properly example of
The text must text has been the text has properly and contains some edited and excellent
be properly edited. been edited. contains many grammatical contains no writing and
edited. language and/or and/or spelling grammatical formulation.
spelling mistakes. mistakes. and/or spelling
mistakes.
5 marks 0.5 1 2 3 4 5

© Milpark Leadership and Change Management LCHM01-8 Assignment 9 April 2019 Page 4 of 8
 Marking rubric
Very Poor Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0–16% 17–33% 34–49% 50–65% 66–83% 84–100%
Interpretation None of the Most of the The question has The question has The question The question
requirements of requirements not been answered been partly has been has been
The question the question of the question properly. Quite a addressed. Some accurately accurately
must be have been have not been number of items items were not interpreted; all interpreted and
accurately addressed. addressed. were not included in the aspects have the answer
interpreted. addressed. answer. been addressed. surpasses
expectations in
addressing the
necessary
aspects.
15 marks 0-1 2-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15
Argument There is no There is almost In general, there The answer can The answer The answer
original no original has been a poor be improved by contains a presents a very
The answer formulation in formulation in attempt to provide increasing the unique and unique and
must contain the answer. The the answer. a unique and uniqueness and original original
a unique and whole answer Most of the original argument. originality of the argument; argument and
original comes from answer has The bigger part of argument. Parts simple can be
argument. existing content. been taken the answer has of the answer replication of presented as a
from existing been taken from have been taken course content contribution to
content. existing content. from course has been the field.
content. avoided.
20 marks 0-2 3-4 5-7 8=11 12-15 16-20

© Milpark Leadership and Change Management LCHM01-8 Assignment 9 April 2019 Page 5 of 8
 Marking rubric
Very Poor Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0–16% 17–33% 34–49% 50–65% 66–83% 84–100%
Sources No relevant and Almost no Too few relevant Although some Relevant and Recent,
credible sources relevant and and credible relevant and credible sources excellent and
Relevant and have been credible sources have been credible sources have been only credible
credible integrated to sources have integrated, and the have been integrated, sources were
sources must support the been argument has not integrated, the supporting the integrated very
be integrated. argument. integrated to been supported argument still argument with successfully to
support the with other expert needs additional other expert support the
argument. opinions from the support from the opinions from argument.
literature. literature. the literature.
10 marks 0-1 2 3–4 5–6 7–8 9–10
Integration The answer The answer The answer does The answer does The answer The answer
demonstrates no demonstrates not sufficiently demonstrate demonstrates demonstrates
The answer attempt to apply almost no demonstrate some analytical analytical excellent
must an analytical attempt to analytical ability, ability, ability, analytical
demonstrate approach; there apply an advanced understanding advanced ability,
analysis, is no evidence of analytical understanding and and clarity of understanding understanding
understanding deeper approach; clarity of thought. thought, but and clarity of and logic. It is
and clarity of understanding there is little Content and ideas there is still thought; there an excellent
thought. and thoughts evidence of have not been room for is proper example in
have been deeper integrated properly improvement in integration and terms of
presented understanding and there are terms of presentation.

© Milpark Leadership and Change Management LCHM01-8 Assignment 9 April 2019 Page 6 of 8
 Marking rubric
Very Poor Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0–16% 17–33% 34–49% 50–65% 66–83% 84–100%
randomly. This and thoughts problems with the integration and logic in the
contributes to have been logic in the logic. presentation.
the complete presented presentation.
absence of logic randomly. This
in the contributes to
presentation. the almost
complete
absence of
logic in the
presentation.
20 marks 0–2 3–4 5–7 8–11 12–15 16-20
Application There is no There is very There is Some examples Successful Theories,
evidence of little evidence insufficient have been application of concepts and
There must application of of application evidence of the integrated to the relevant models were
be application relevant theory, of relevant application of demonstrate the theory, concepts critically
of the concepts and theory, relevant theory, application of and models, and evaluated to
relevant examples. concepts and concepts and theory, concepts application to support the
theory, Examples from examples. examples. The and models. own or answer. There
concepts and the context or Some answer is in need However, there contextual is innovation in
models. own experience examples from of some own or is still room for examples. the application
the context or the integration of

© Milpark Leadership and Change Management LCHM01-8 Assignment 9 April 2019 Page 7 of 8
 Marking rubric
Very Poor Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0–16% 17–33% 34–49% 50–65% 66–83% 84–100%
would have own contextual own and/or of the concepts
assisted. experience examples. contextual and models.
would have examples.
assisted.

20 marks 0–2 3–4 5–7 8–11 12–15 16-20

TOTAL MARKS: 100

© Milpark Leadership and Change Management LCHM01-8 Assignment 9 April 2019 Page 8 of 8