Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, log
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use i
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
©
COPYRIGHT 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
© 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2018 June;153(3):316-25
Online version at http://www.minervamedica.it DOI: 10.23736/S0392-0488.16.05427-4
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
1Department of Dermatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome Italy; 2Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University
of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome Italy; 3Polyclinic of University Tor Vergata of Rome, Rome Italy; 4Department of Clinical Pathology and
Microbiology, and Clinical Dermatology, San Gallicano Institute, Rome Italy; 5Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa Italy
*Corresponding author: Elena Campione, Department of Dermatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.
E-mail: campioneelena@hotmail.com
A B S TRA C T
BACKGROUND: Clinical or quality of life assessments are currently available for psoriasis severity evaluation and therapeutic response. Labo-
ratory scores focused to measure and follow treatment efficacy are lacking at present.
METHODS: A microscopic and biomolecular score was designed to monitor skin disease severity and clinical response to anti-psoriatic treat-
ments. A susceptibility gene analysis on cellular retinoic acid binding protein-II (CRABP-II), acting on keratinocyte differentiation, was also
performed. A Molecular Index of Therapeutic Efficacy (MITE) was defined by assembling morphometric/semiquantitative measurement of epi-
dermal thickness, immunohistochemical Ki-67, keratin 17 and CRABP-II expression of lesional and non-lesional psoriatic skin biopsies before
and after anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α therapies. A 0-12 MITE score was correlated with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and
Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) scores and inflammation. Three CRABP-II SNPs were analyzed by TaqMan assay.
RESULTS: All parameters were highly expressed in psoriatic lesions and reduced after 12 weeks of anti-TNF-α treatments. MITE score strongly
correlated with PASI and PDI values either before or after therapies (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Conversely, MITE values did not
change after treatments of non-responder patients. CRABP-II did not result in a psoriatic susceptibility gene for the SNPs probes analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: MITE score variations corresponded to the patients’ clinical improvement following anti-TNF-α treatments, with significant
statistical correlation among MITE, PASI and PDI scores. If confirmed in a larger series and/or in different hyperproliferative and inflamma-
tory dermatoses, MITE score could be proposed as additional monitoring system to evaluate treatment protocols in skin disorders and targeted
biomolecular pathways supporting clinical efficacy.
(Cite this article as: Bianchi L, Costanza G, Campione E, Ruzzetti M, Di Stefani A, Diluvio L, et al. Biomolecular index of therapeutic efficacy in
psoriasis treated with anti-TNF-α agents. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2108;153:316-25. DOI: 10.23736/S0392-0488.16.05427-4)
Key words: Psoriasis - Patient outcome assessment - Inflammation - Therapeutics.
the psoriatic plaque.2, 3 Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) several questionnaires on the patients’ quality of life
α, secreted by innate or adaptive immune system cells, (QoL) are the most employed methods for clinical and
sustains the clinical manifestations of psoriasis at both therapeutic scoring.7, 8 Possible soluble biomarkers or
skin and joint level.4, 5 Its relevance has been clinically laboratory parameters associated with psoriasis sever-
ity or systemic inflammation or response to treatment of approval: 25th March 2005) and has been performed
with TNF-inhibitors are also investigated but none of in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in
them translated as a score into the clinical practice.9 In the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amend-
the past, multiparameters analyzed by flow cytometry ments or comparable ethical standards.
and immunohistochemistry have tried to assess prolif- Informed consent was obtained from all individual
eration and differentiation simultaneously in some hy- participants included in the research study.
perproliferative skin disorders including psoriasis.10, 11
We believe that the definition of a unique biomolecular Study population
score comprehensive of epidermal proliferative and dif-
ferentiative parameters could reinforce the clinical as- Fifty-nine patients (19 female and 40 male patients,
sessment of severity of the disease and the response to mean age 46.3±12.3 years) affected by moderate-to-
the different therapies. We designed a semiquantitative severe plaque-type psoriasis were randomly enrolled in
assay, named Molecular Index of Therapeutic Efficacy an open, prospective, observational study at the Depart-
(MITE), based on the measurement of epidermal thick- ment of Dermatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata,
ness, and semiquantitative evaluation of the expres- and at San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, Rome,
sion of selected proliferative and psoriatic markers in Italy. Approval of the study was obtained from institu-
lesional and non-lesional skin biopsies, before and after tional Ethical Committees and Public Health Ministry
anti-TNF-α therapies, in an open multicenter prospec- in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients
tive study on 59 plaque-type psoriatic patients treated were randomly assigned to each agent, namely etaner-
with three anti-TNF-α biologics (etanercept, adalimum- cept, adalimumab and infliximab, as in real life setting.
ab, infliximab).12, 13 Although in previous studies differ- Patients’ clinical characteristics are listed in Table I. The
ent key protein levels have been already analyzed and clinical response to the biologic was measured by PASI
correlated to clinical scores, we tried to combine into a and Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) at baseline and at 12
unique index microscopic and biomolecular parameters weeks.19 All patients eligible for biologic therapy did not
altered in skin psoriasis.14, 15 To validate our proposal, receive any systemic treatment for at least three months
lesional MITE has been compared to lymphocyte accu- or any topical therapy for at least 2 weeks prior the study
mulation and PASI and Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) entry. All patients signed a written informed consent.
scores at baseline and after 12 weeks of three different Analysis and quantification of MITE parameters on skin
anti-TNF-α treatments. Cellular retinol and retinoic acid lesions and their comparison with clinical scores were
binding proteins critically regulate retinol and its ac-
performed to monitor the clinical counterpart of anti-
tive metabolite all-trans retinoic acid (atRA)-mediated
TNF-α effects. An age- and sex-matched control group
transcriptional activity.16 Retinoic acid binding protein
II (CRABP-II) mediates epidermal hyperproliferation
acting on keratinocyte differentiation and CRABP-II Table I.—General demographic and clinical characteristics of en-
mRNA level is dramatically increased in psoriatic le- rolled psoriatic patients at baseline.
sions.17 Consequently, we also investigated the possible Characteristics Value
role of CRABP-II as susceptibility psoriatic gene. This N. 59 (100)
gene maps on chromosome 1q21.3 and clusters into Male 40 (67.8)
Female 19 (32.2)
PSORS4, a well-known psoriasis susceptibility locus, Treatment
part of keratinocyte differentiation-related genes.18 Etanercept 29 (49.1)
Infliximab 15 (25.45)
Adalimumab 15 (25.45)
Materials and methods Mean age, years 46.3±1.4 (25-57)
PASI at baseline 11.25±1.2 (0-34.2)
Ethics Committee approval
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
included 20 healthy untreated subjects who were under- rameters. A 0-3 value was attributed to each of the items
going an Institutional health surveillance program. investigated, with a final 0-12 MITE score. Four catego-
ries of MITE degrees severity (0-3; 3.1-6; 6.1-9; 9.1-12),
Treatments and skin biopsy respectively absent/minimal, mild, moderate, severe,
were arbitrarily obtained and calculated, as summarized
Etanercept and adalimumab were administered subcu- in the Table II. Epidermal thickness was quantified us-
taneously, whereas infliximab intravenously, following ing arbitrary score units: 0 for 0-152 μm, 1 for 153-313
the protocol procedures and dosages in accordance with μm, 2 for 314-396 μm, 3 for 396-540 μm.15 Score units
the international guidelines.19 Only chronic stable plaques (0-3) for immunohistochemical evaluation of CRABP-
were selected for the biopsies. At baseline, before starting II were arbitrarily defined as reported.23 Ki-67 expres-
the treatment, 3-mm punch skin biopsies were obtained sion was evaluated as the percentage of positive epider-
from lesional and non-lesional areas for morphological mal nuclei as follows: 0 for 0-10%, 1 for 11-20%, 2 for
and immunohistochemical evaluation. In order to inves- 21-30%, 3 for >30%.24 K17 expression was graded as
tigate therapy-induced reversal of the proposed skin pa- reported with modifications: 0 for no staining or focal
rameters, punch biopsy samples were collected in all the <5% total, 1 for skip areas between positive staining, 2
59 patients in remaining lesions at 12 weeks of therapy. for confluent horizontally plus <40% positive epidermis,
3 for confluent horizontally plus >40% positive epider-
mis.25 Finally, CD3+ lymphocytes were quantified and
Microscopic and immunohistochemical study results expressed for epidermal (positive cells per mm)
Biopsies were fixed in 10% formalin for 24 hours, and dermal compartment (positive cells per mm2), re-
paraffin embedded and four-μm thick serial sections spectively.26 For comparisons, four arbitrary categories
stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histopathologi- (0-3) were obtained considering mean values. Blinded
cal examination or employed for immunohistochemis- evaluations were performed by two independent re-
try.20 For the latter, serial 4 μm thick sections were in- searchers at 200× magnification in at least 10 randomly
cubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-CRABP-II (1:300, selected fields, with interobserver variability <5%.27 In
1 hour; Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA), order to correlate with MITE, PASI and PDI scores were
followed by biotin-labelled goat anti-rabbit secondary converted in four categories of severity for each patient:
antibody and streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conju- PASI as absent (0-0.99 = 0), mild (1-10 = 1), moderate
gated (Ylem,1:100).21 Serial slides were also incubated (11-20 = 2), severe (21-72 = 3);9 for PDI: absent-mild
with monoclonal mouse anti-K17 (1:50; Cell Marque (0-15 = 0); mild-moderate (16-23 = 1); moderate-severe
(24-33 = 2) and very severe (33-45 = 3). PDI and PASI
Corporation, Rocklin, CA, USA), followed by revelation
evaluations were performed by three trained clinical ob-
with Ultravision LP Detection System (Thermo Scien-
servers, with interobserver variability <5%.
tific, Waltham, MA, USA). Immunostaining with mouse
anti-Ki-67 (clone 30-9) and rabbit anti-CD3 lymphocyte
monoclonal antibodies (clone 2GV6) was performed by Table II.—Categories and detailed description used for MITE
scores (0-12).
using an Automated Immunohistochemistry Staining
(Ventana Medical Systems, Roche Holding, Basel, Swit- Score MITE category Details
zerland), according to manufacturer’s instructions, and 0-3 Absent/minimal Overall expression of absent or focal biomarkers/
positive and negative controls.22 As control, anonymous Skin morphologically similar to normal
3.1-6 Mild Overall expression of biomarkers mild/Skin
control skin sections from paraffin block archive of surgi- morphologically shows mild psoriatic typical
cally excided non-neoplastic biopsies were also investi- alterations
gated (N.=13; mean age 43.5±0.75 years; range 24-58). 6.1-9 Moderate Overall expression of biomarkers moderate/
Skin morphologically shows the typical psoriatic
alterations
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
Evaluation of MITE, clinical scores and inflammation 9.1-12 Severe Overall expression of biomarkers is high and
marked/Skin morphologically shows severe
psoriatic alterations
A new score system, MITE, was based on morpho-
MITE: Molecular Index of Therapeutic Efficacy.
metric and semiquantitative evaluation of epidermal pa-
C
B
K17 (AU) Ki-67 + nuclei (%)
A
H&E
D
E. thickness (μm)
NS
LS (T0)
etanercept
NLS
LS (T0)
LS (T12)
LS (T0)
adalimumab
LS (T0)
LS (T12)
LS (T12)
319
ment. D) Bar graph showing the increased of parameters in lesional skin (LS) at baseline (T0), compared to control normal (NS) and non-lesional
psoriatic skin. After 12 weeks of treatment (T12), all values are drastically decreased compared to the baseline. Diaminobenzidine is used as a
sentative images of epidermal thickness in H&E-stained, Ki-67 and K17 in non-lesional skin, lesional skin at baseline and after 12 weeks of treat-
Figure 1.—Evaluation of anti-TNF-α changes on epidermal thickness, proliferation and differentiation in normal and psoriatic skin. A-C) Repre-
BIANCHI
not permitted. It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, log
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use i
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
©
COPYRIGHT 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
BIANCHI BIOMOLECULAR INDEX OF ANTI-TNF-α EFFICACY
Characteristics of enrolled patients and treatments tients it remained similar to baseline (not shown). Re-
duction of CRABP-II expression was similar with the
Demographic characteristics and mean values of three TNF-α inhibitors, with a 50-54% mean decrease
PASI, PDI and MITE scores, measured at baseline, comparing to the baseline.
% of caases
severe
infliximab
adalimumab evaluated (Figure 4A). Infliximab and adalimumab in-
duced the highest response (P<0.0003), compared with
the improvement due to the etanercept (P<0.003).
showed an absent/minimal MITE Index (0-3), whereas adalimumab (P<0.002 and P<0.01, respectively). After
the remaining 37.1% displayed mild MITE Index (3.1-6) 12 weeks of anti-TNF-α treatments, also PDI score de-
(Figure 3). After 12 weeks of therapy, a consistent MITE creased (Figure 4D; P<0.01) for all the 3 drugs, although
score reduction in lesional skin was detectable, either the decrease was less pronounced for etanercept (P<0.05).
K17 1 0.98 #
CRABP-II 1
After treatment
Epidermal thickness 1 0.68* 0.9 # 0.86 #
Ki-67 1 0.91 # 0.88 #
K17 1 0.95 #
CRABP-II 1
C All drugs E I A CRABP-II: retinoic acid binding protein II.
*P<0.01; # P<0.001.
LS (T0)
LS (T12)
Table IV.—Correlation among epidermal biomarkers and PASI
and PDI indexes before and after anti-TNF-α treatments.
PDI score
PASI PDI
Before treatment
Epidermal thickness 0.67* 0.48*
Ki-67 0.77 # 0.55*
K17 0.63* 0.5*
All drugs E I A CRABP-II 0.78 # 0.62*
D After treatment
Figure 4.—Distribution of MITE, CD3+ lymphocytes reduction rate, Epidermal thickness 0.7* 0.49*
PASI and PDI score after anti-TNF-α regimen. A) MITE score decrease Ki-67 0.9 # 0.63*
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
in lesional skin (LS) after 12 weeks treatment (T12), considering all K17 0.62* 0.55*
treatments compared to baseline (T0); B) rate reduction of CD3 positive CRABP-II 0.9 # 0.6*
cells (%) after 12 weeks of treatments (T12/T0). C, D) PASI and PDI
decrease after 12 weeks of treatments (T12). *P<0.05; # P<0.01.
E: etanercept; I: infliximab; A: adalimumab. PASI: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PDI: Psoriasis Disability Index; CRABP-
II: retinoic acid binding protein II.
*P<0.01; **P<0.003; ***P<0.0005 (all by t-test).
CRABP-II gene analysis Table VI.—Haplotype CRABP-II SNPs frequency in Italian pa-
tients and controls. The CRABP-II gene was analyzed using three
The analysis of CRABP-II gene (1q21.3) performed specific TaqMan probes (rs4661213 T/C, rs12041913 G/A and
rs124006221 A/G).
using three specific TaqMan probes (rs4661213 T/C,
Frequency
rs12041913 G/A and rs124006221 A/G) and the soft- Haplotype P value
ware UNPHASED failed to reveal a significant P value Cases Controls
between the disease and the three tested variants; no T-G-A 0.58 0.52 NS
departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was de- T-G-G 0.3607 0.3814 NS
T-A-A 0.009 0.004 NS
tected (Tables V, VI). These findings suggested that, at T-A-G 0.0 0.002 NS
least for those probes and for population of considered, C-G-A 0.05 0.04 NS
CRABP-II is not a susceptibility gene for skin psoriasis. C-G-G 0.0 0.006 NS
C-A-A 0.0007 0.0 NS
NS: not statistically significant.
Discussion
In this study, we proposed a molecular index to quan-
psoriatic parameters during the course of the disease to
tify and measure epidermal psoriatic parameters during the
evaluate efficacy of the treatments but, to our knowledge,
course of biologic anti-TNF-α therapies.15, 25, 29, 30 MITE
the different tools were not collected together to realize a
score was obtained from the sum of morphometric/semi-
score as PASI or QoL calculations do clinically.10, 11, 34-36
quantitative evaluation of four epidermal morphological,
PASI is widely considered as the mainstay for assessing
proliferative and differentiative parameters: thickness, Ki-
the course of psoriasis severity.7 Nevertheless, because
67, K17 and CRABP-II expression.14, 17, 25, 31 Similarly to
of the possible PASI limitations due to clinical variants
the currently employed clinical scores, semiquantitative
or mild forms, different outcome measures have been
sums converted in MITE score were categorized into
routinely incorporated into clinical trials.37 Microscopi-
four degrees of MITE severity.32, 33 Previous studies al-
cally, plaque psoriasis is a hyperproliferative epidermal
ready compared histological and immunohistochemical
disorder characterized by spinous layer hyperplasia and
incomplete differentiation of granular and cornified
layers.38 The evaluation of the epidermal hyperplasia
Table V.—Allele and genotype association between psoriasis and has been employed to confirm the diagnosis, measure
specific CRABP-II SNPs. The CRABP-II gene was analyzed us-
ing three specific TaqMan probes (rs4661213 T/C, rs12041913 the clinical severity and follow the efficacy of thera-
G/A and rs124006221 A/G). pies.14, 39, 40 Prominent epidermal hyperplasia induces
rs4661213 P value rs12041913 P value rs12406221 P value an increased basal and suprabasal Ki-67 positivity, oth-
Allele Allele Allele erwise observed only in the basal layer of the normal
frequency frequency frequency skin.16, 38, 41 Similarly, proliferative rate has been used in
Cases Cases Cases several studies to monitor the efficacy of anti-psoriatic
T: 0.953 NS G: 0.991 NS A: 0.64 NS
C: 0.047 A: 0.009 G: 0.36
drugs.16, 25, 26, 31 It has been shown that the keratinocyte
Controls Controls Controls cell cycle time is greatly reduced in psoriasis whereas the
T: 0.959 G 0.995 A: 0.61 number of dividing cells is increased, resulting in a hyper-
C: 0.041 A: 0.005 G: 0.39 plastic epithelium.42 In addition, aberrant keratinocytes
Genotype Genotype Genotype
frequency frequency frequency differentiation occurs in psoriatic epidermis, likely for
Cases Cases Cases abnormal expression of specific keratin filaments related
TT: 0.90 NS GG: 0.98 NS AA: 0.42 NS to an accelerated cell turn-over.1, 43, 44 K17 expression is
TC: 0.10 GA: 0.02 AG: 0.44
CC: 0.0 AA: 0.0 GG: 0.14
absent in normal epidermis but is strong in psoriatic su-
Controls Controls Controls prabasal keratinocytes.45 K17 expression is considered a
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
TT: 0.91 GG: 0.99 AA: 0.39 marker of incomplete differentiation and its reduction as
TC: 0.09 GA: 0.01 AG: 0.46 an index of efficacy of anti-psoriatic treatment.35, 37 We
CC: 0.0 AA: 0.0 GG: 0.15
also considered epidermal CRABP-II expression, since
NS: not statistically significant.
CRABP-II is an intracytoplasmic receptor that mediates
RA intracellular trafficking and activity, and RA a crucial validate its potential role as a support to other therapeu-
effector or keratinocyte differentiation.46 Previous stud- tic and clinical indexes. MITE score could assist and
ies reported increased CRABP-II expression in psoriatic complete PASI and QoL evaluations in clinic trials as
skin.47, 48 Because of the increased keratinocyte turn-over additional useful screening to monitor therapeutic ap-
in psoriasis plaque, aberrant CRABP-II expression likely proaches or to better follow treatment protocols in hy-
mediates hyperproliferative epidermal condition, becom- perproliferative inflammatory skin disorders. Studies
ing a useful marker for monitoring effects of anti-psori- are also needed to investigate alternative genetically de-
atic treatment on aberrant keratinocyte proliferation and termined CRABP-II dependent pathways which might
differentiation.48 All epidermal biomarkers were signifi- influence keratinocyte differentiation in psoriasis.
cantly increased in psoriatic skin samples at baseline in
comparison to non-lesional skin, and their values com- References
pletely reversed to similar to control skin after the dif-
1. Lowes MA, Bowcock AM, Krueger JG. Pathogenesis and therapy of
ferent anti-TNF-α treatments, in parallel with the overall psoriasis. Nature 2007;445:866-73.
restoration of normal epidermal architecture. We assem- 2. Uyemura K, Yamamura M, Fivenson DF, Modlin RL, Nickoloff BJ.
The cytokine network in lesional and lesion-free psoriatic skin is
bled all these described parameters into MITE Index and characterized by a T-helper type 1 cell-mediated response. J Invest
documented that after 12 weeks of treatment with three Derm 1993;101:701-5.
3. Nickoloff BJ, Qin JZ, Nestle FO. Immunopathogenesis of psoriasis.
anti-TNF-α inhibitors, MITE Indexes correlated with Cli Rev Allergy Immunol 2007;33:45-56.
changes of PASI and PDI scores and with the reduction of 4. Chiricozzi A, Guttman-Yassky E, Suarez-Farinas M, Nograles KE,
Tian S, Cardinale I, et al. Integrative responses to IL-17 and TNF-al-
CD3+ T lymphocyte accumulation. No significant MITE pha in human keratinocytes account for key inflammatory pathogenic
scores differences were observed with the different anti- circuits in psoriasis. J Invest Derm 2011;131:677-87.
5. Lew W, Bowcock AM, Krueger JG. Psoriasis vulgaris: cutaneous
TNF-α agents, adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab, in lymphoid tissue supports T-cell activation and “Type 1” inflamma-
responder patients. Nevertheless, MITE, PASI and PDI tory gene expression. Trends Immunol 2004;25:295-305.
6. Papoutsaki M, Chimenti MS, Costanzo A, Talamonti M, Zangrilli A,
documented a higher rate of individual failures after etan- Giunta A, et al. Adalimumab for severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthri-
ercept treatment (50% of non-responders), as reported in tis: an open-label study in 30 patients previously treated with other
the literature.13, 49 MITE might facilitate the measure- biologics J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;57:269-75.
7. Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis--oral therapy with a
ment of disease severity focusing and collecting different new retinoid. Dermatologica 1978;157:238-44.
features of psoriatic keratinocytes. We also investigated 8. Finlay AY, Kelly SE. Psoriasis-an index of disability. Clin Exp Der-
matol 1987;12:8-11.
the possible role of CRABP-II as psoriasis susceptibility 9. Chandran V, Shen H, Pollock RA, Pellett FJ, Carty A, Cook RJ, et
gene. CRABP-II gene maps on chromosome 1q21.3, clus- al. Soluble biomarkers associated with response to treatment with
tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol
tering into the psoriasis susceptibility locus, PSORS4, 2013;40:866-71.
which includes several keratinocyte differentiation-re- 10. Glade CP, Van Erp PE, Van De Kerkhof PC. Epidermal cell DNA con-
tent and intermediate filaments keratin 10 and vimentin after treat-
lated genes.18, 50 The altered CRABP-II expression might ment of psoriasis with calcipotriol cream once daily, twice daily and
represent a response to a psoriatic inflammatory status or in combination with clobetasone 17-butyrate cream or betamethasone
17-valerate cream: a comparative flow cytometric study. Br J Derma-
indicate an involvement of the gene products in the hy- tol 1996;135:379-84.
perproliferative phenotype. We analyzed three different 11. Franssen ME, Boezeman JB, Van De Kerkhof PC, Van Erp PE.
Monitoring hyperproliferative disorders in human skin: flow cytom-
SNPs and seven different haplotypes, but no significant etry of changing cytokeratin expression. Citometry B Clin Cytom
associations could be highlighted, although other SNPs 2004;57:32-9.
12. Fernandez-Torres RM, Paradela S, Fonseca E. Long-term response to
on CRABP-II gene potentially associated with the disease etanercept monotherapy in moderate to severe psoriasis: assessment
should be investigated, at least for the population of Cen- in daily practice by the maintenance of low values of PASI and BSA.
J Dermatol Treat 2014;25:54-6
tral Italy we considered. 13. Piaserico S, Cazzaniga S, Chimenti S, Giannetti A, Maccarone M,
Picardo M, et al. Efficacy of switching between tumor necrosis fac-
tor-alfa inhibitors in psoriasis: results from the Italian Psocare regis-
Conclusions try. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;70:257-62.
14. Werner B, Bresch M, Brenner FM, Lima HC. Comparative study of
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
16. Doldo E, Costanza G, Agostinelli S, Tarquini C, Ferlosio A, Arcuri son of the efficacy of biologics versus conventional systemic thera-
G, et al. Vitamin A, cancer treatment and prevention: the new role of pies in the treatment of psoriasis at a comprehensive psoriasis care
cellular retinol binding proteins. Biomed Res Int 2015; art ID 624627. center. J Drugs Dermatol 2013;12:861-6.
17. Siegenthaler G, Tomatis I, Didierjean L, Jaconi S, Saurat JH. Over- 34. Bovenschen HJ, Vissers WH, Seyger MM, van de Kerkhof PC. Se-
expression of cellular retinoic acid-binding protein type II (CRABP- lective persistence of dermal CD8+ T cells in lesional plaque pso-
II) and down-regulation of CRABP-I in psoriatic skin. Dermatology riasis after clobetasol-17 propionate treatment. Acta Derm Venereol
1992;185:251-6. 2005;85:113-7.
18. Capon F, Semprini S, Chimenti S, Fabrizi G, Zambruno G, Murgia S, 35. Lago E, Carneiro S, Cuzzi T, Magalhães G, Cássia F, Pessanha F,
et al. Fine mapping of the PSORS4 psoriasis susceptibility region on et al. Clinical and immunohistochemical assessment of the effect of
chromosome 1q21. J invest Dermatol 2001;116:728-30. cyclosporin in keratinocytes and dermal dendrocytes in psoriasis. J
19. Pathirana D, Ormerod AD, Saiag P, Smith C, Spuls PI, Nast A, et al. Cutan Pathol 2007;34:15-21.
European S3-guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vul- 36. Vissers WH, Berends M, Muys L, van Erp PE, de Jong EM, van de
garis. JEADV 2009; 23 Suppl 2:1-70. Kerkhof PC. The effect of the combination of calcipotriol and beta-
20. Orlandi A, Ciucci A, Ferlosio A, Pellegrino A, Chiariello L, Spag- methasone dipropionate versus both monotherapies on epidermal
noli LG. Increased expression and activity of matrix metallo- proliferation, keratinization and T-cell subsets in chronic plaque pso-
proteinases characterize embolic cardiac myxomas. Am J Pathol riasis. Exp Dermatol 2004 ;13:106-12.
2005;166:1619-28. 37. Naldi L, Svensson A, Diepgen T, Elsner P, Grob JJ, Coenraads PJ,
21. Cervelli V, Scioli MG, Gentile P, Doldo E, Bonanno E, Spagnoli LG, et al. Randomized clinical trials for psoriasis 1977-2000: the EDEN
et al. Platelet-rich plasma greatly potentiates insulin-induced adipo- survey. J Invest Dermatol 2003;120:738-41.
genic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells through 38. Soini Y, Kamel D, Paakko P, Lehto VP, Oikarinen A, Vähäkangas KV.
a serine/threonine kinase Akt-dependent mechanism and promotes Aberrant accumulation of p53 associates with Ki67 and mitotic count
clinical fat graft maintenance. Stem Cells Transl Med 2012;1:206-20. in benign skin lesions. Br J Dermatol 1994;131:514-20.
22. Ciuffreda L, Di Sanza C, Cesta Incani U, Eramo A, Desideri M, Bia- 39. Chapman DM, Ross JB. Objective measurement of three epidermal
gioni F, et al. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade parameters in psoriasis vulgaris and in dermatopathology in general.
controls phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression through Br J Dermatol 1988;119:333-43.
multiple mechanisms. J Mol Med (Berl) 2012;90:667-79. 40. Alper M, Kavak A, Parlak AH, Demirci R, Belenli I, Yesildal N. Meas-
23. Doldo E, Costanza G, Ferlosio A, Passeri D, Bernardini S, Scioli MG, urement of epidermal thickness in a patient with psoriasis by comput-
et al. CRBP-1 expression in ovarian cancer: a potential therapeutic er-supported image analysis. Braz J Med Biol Res 2004;37:111-7.
target. Anticancer Res 2014;34:3303-12. 41. Abdou AG, Maraee AH, Eltahmoudy M, El-Aziz RA. Immunohisto-
24. Jang HS, Oh CK, Jo JH, Kim YS, Kwon KS. Detection of telomerase
activity in psoriasis lesional skin and correlation with Ki-67 expression chemical expression of GLUT-1 and Ki-67 in chronic plaque psoria-
and suppression by retinoic acid. J Korean Med Sci 2001;16:623-9. sis. Am J Dermatopathol 2013;35:731-7.
25. Marble DJ, Gordon KB, Nickoloff BJ. Targeting TNFalpha rap- 42. Bernerd F, Magnaldo T, Darmon M. Delayed onset of epidermal dif-
idly reduces density of dendritic cells and macrophages in psoriatic ferentiation in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 1992;98:902-10.
plaques with restoration of epidermal keratinocyte differentiation. J 43. Bergboer JG, Zeeuwen PL, Schalkwijk J. Genetics of psoriasis: evi-
Dermatol Sci 2007;48:87-101. dence for epistatic interaction between skin barrier abnormalities and
26. Scioli MG, Stasi MA, Passeri D, Doldo E, Costanza G, Camerini immune deviation. J Invest Dermatol 2012;132:2320-31.
R, et al. Propionyl-L-Carnitine is Efficacious in Ulcerative Colitis 44. Weinstein GD, McCullough JL, Ross PA. Cell kinetic basis for patho-
Through its Action on the Immune Function and Microvasculature. physiology of psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 1985;85:579-83.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2014;5:e55. 45. Leigh IM, Navsaria H, Purkis PE, McKay IA, Bowden PE, Rid-
27. Pisano C, De Cesare M, Beretta GL, Zuco V, Pratesi G, Penco S, dle PN. Keratins (K16 and K17) as markers of keratinocyte hy-
et al. Preclinical profile of antitumor activity of a novel hydrophilic perproliferation in psoriasis in vivo and in vitro. Br J Dermatol
camptothecin, ST1968. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:2051-9. 1995;133:501-11.
28. Lepre T, Cascella R, Ragazzo M, Galli E, Novelli G, Giardina E. As- 46. Noy N. Retinoid-binding proteins: mediators of retinoid action. Bio-
sociation of KIF3A, but not OVOL1 and ACTL9, with atopic eczema chem J 2000;348:481-95.
in Italian patients. Br J Dermatol 2013;168:1106-8. 47. Torma H, Asselineau D, Andersson E, Martin B, Reiniche P, Cham-
29. de Jong EM, van Vlijmen IM, van Erp PE, Ramaekers FC, Troy- bon P, et al. Biologic activities of retinoic acid and 3,4-didehy-
anovski SM, van de Kerkhof PC. Keratin 17: a useful marker in anti- droretinoic acid in human keratinocytes are similar and correlate with
psoriatic therapies. Arch Dermatol Res 1991;283:480-2. receptor affinities and transactivation properties. J Invest Dermatol
30. Karlsson T, Virtanen M, Sirsjo A, Rollman O, Vahlquist A, Törmä H. 1994;102:49-54.
Topical retinoic acid alters the expression of cellular retinoic acid- 48. Algermissen B, Sitzmann J, LeMotte P, Czarnetzki B. Differential ex-
binding protein-I and cellular retinoic acid-binding protein-II in non- pression of CRABP II, psoriasin and cytokeratin 1 mRNA in human
lesional but not lesional psoriatic skin. Exp Dermatol 2002 ;11:143-52. skin diseases. Arch Dermatol Res 1996;288:426-30.
31. Shi X, Jin L, Dang E, Chang T, Feng Z, Liu Y, et al. IL-17A up- 49. Cordiali-Fei P, Bianchi L, Bonifati C, Trento E, Ruzzetti M, Franc-
regulates keratin 17 expression in keratinocytes through STAT1- and esconi F, et al. Immunologic biomarkers for clinical and therapeutic
STAT3-dependent mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol 2011;131:2401-8. management of psoriasis. Mediators Inflamm 2014;2014:236060.
32. Smith CH, Anstey AV, Barker JN, Burden AD, Chalmers RJ, Chandler 50. Giardina E, Capon F, De Rosa MC, Mango R, Zambruno G, Orecchia
DA, et al. British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for biolog- A, et al. Characterization of the loricrin (LOR) gene as a positional
ic interventions for psoriasis 2009. Br J Dermatol 2009;161:987-1019. candidate for the PSORS4 psoriasis susceptibility locus. Ann Hum
33. Au SC, Madani A, Alhaddad M, Alkofide M, Gottlieb AB. Compari- Genet 2004;68:639-45.
Authors’ contributions.—Luca Bianchi and Gaetana Costanza contributed equally to this work.
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
Funding.—This work was partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (2008).
Conflicts of interest.—The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.
Acknowledgements.—The authors wish to thank M. Maccarone, President of Italian Psoriatic Patient Association (ADIPSO), for providing access to database
and questionnaires, and S. Cappelli for providing technical collaboration.
Article first published online: September 14, 2016. - Manuscript accepted: September 12, 2016. - Manuscript received: July 28, 2016.