Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Inga M Koszalka and Lothar Stramma, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research & University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Introduction 204
Historical Perspective 204
Large-Scale Circulation of the Atlantic 205
Horizontal and Vertical Extent 205
Upper Ocean Circulation in the Atlantic 205
Intermediate and Deep Circulation of the Atlantic Ocean 208
Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation 208
Variability of the Atlantic Current Systems 209
Short-Term and Meso-(and Smaller)-Scale Variability 209
Long-Term and Large-Scale Variability 210
Future Aspects 210
Further Reading 211
Glossary
Sverdrup (symbol: Sv) Is a non-SI unit of volume transport used in oceanography to measure the volume flux of ocean
currents. It calculated from a product of the normal velocity and cross-sectional area. (1 Sv ¼ 106 m3 s1) It is named after
Norwegian oceanographer and meteorologist, Harald Sverdrup (1880–1957).
Introduction
The Atlantic Ocean is the most studied and best understood of the World Oceans, for the reason of its importance for the European
and American societies. Since the 16th century the marine trans-Atlantic passenger fright and trade have been constantly developing
and the knowledge of the Gulf Stream and other current systems in the Atlantic became crucial, prompting scientific investigations.
By the late 19th century the large-scale surface circulation of the Atlantic Ocean had been mapped out. Rapidly growing number of
observations in the 20th century, accompanied by numerical modeling efforts, fathomed out the deep flows and spotlighted intense
variability of the Atlantic currents on a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. The unique thermohaline circulation of the
Atlantic Ocean plays a vital role in the global climate system. The warm upper-ocean currents, originating in part from the Pacific
and Indian Oceans, transport mass and heat through the South Atlantic and toward the North Atlantic and influence atmospheric
heat and moisture on synoptic, seasonal and longer time scales. The cold deep waters of the North Atlantic flow southward, cross the
South Atlantic, and are exported into the Indian and the Pacific Oceans; these modulate the global climate on decadal and longer
time scales. The challenge remains to develop and optimize observational and modeling frameworks able to monitor multiscale
variability of the Atlantic currents and to predict their interactions with the global climate system with attendant socio-economic
consequences.
Historical Perspective
By the 5th century AD, mariners had probably acquired intimate knowledge of coastal currents in the Mediterranean, and the
medieval Norse sailors were likely familiar with many facets of North Atlantic oceanography, meteorology and climate including
the surface boundary current system, tides, and sea ice, but little information about them is reported in Classical writing. The
voyages of discovery brought startling observations of many of the Atlantic’s most important ocean currents. The Gulf Stream
(a warm, strong ocean current that pushes northeast from the Gulf of Mexico, up the Atlantic coast, toward Europe) appears to have
been mapped as early as 1525 (by Ribeiro) on the basis of Spanish pilot charts. Significant advances in mapping the global ocean
☆
Change History: May 2018. Inga M. Koszalka and Lothar Stramma updated in the text. The section “Basin Structure” was removed; the section “Historical
Developments” was renamed to “Historical Perspective.” The old sections were modified and new subsections “Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation”
and “Variability of the Atlantic Current systems” were added. Figures 1 and 2 were removed and some figures 3 and 5 were put together as Figure 1; also added a
panel B to Figure 2. Table 1 was updated. An animation was added (Movie.gif ). The references list (Further Reading) was updated. Krauss, 1986 was removed.
Haine et al. (2008), Carton and Hakkinen, Eds., (2011) and Siedler, Griffies, Gould and Church (Eds), (2013) were added.
This is an update of L. Stramma, Current Systems in the Atlantic Ocean, Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences (2nd Edn), edited by John H. Steele, Academic Press, 2001,
pp. 718–727.
circulation came only after the invention of the marine chronometer whereby routine determination of longitude at sea was
instituted; as one of the first came the highly accurate “Chart of the Gulf Stream” (1786, by Franklin and Folger). In the early 19th
century data from the Atlantic were collected and reduced in a systematic fashion (by James Rennell), to produce the first detailed
description of the major circulation patterns at the surface for the entire mid- and low-latitude Atlantic, along with evidence for
cross-equatorial flow. This work provided a foundation for the assemblage of a global data set (by Humboldt and Berghaus) that
yielded worldwide charts of the nonpolar currents by the late 1830s. A next advance came with the understanding of the effect of
Earth’s rotation on large-scale motion through the so-called Coriolis force that produces flow perpendicular to horizontal pressure
gradients to the right (left) on the Northern (Southern) Hemisphere (geostrophic balance; 1856, Ferrel). The precedents for modern
dedicated research cruises came in the 1870s (e.g., the Challenger cruise). With the ever-increasing numbers of observations made at
and near the surface, the upper-layer circulation in nonpolar latitudes was approximately described by the late 1880s. Application of
the Miller-Casella thermometer enabling measurements down to 2500 m provided a growing evidence for the existence of a deep
and global thermohaline circulation (Carpenter, Prestwich) followed by the invention of a device for obtaining samples of seawater
at a specific depth (1894, Nansen). Further development was provided by understanding of how wind can drive ocean circulation
(1928, Ekman), and by application of the dynamical method that enabled derivation of geostrophic currents from hydrographic
(temperature, salinity) measurements. At the time of the German Meteor expedition (1925–1927) a vision of the horizontal and
vertical circulation in the Atlantic with layering of the different water masses was not far from our present concept of the Atlantic’s
large-scale “overturning circulation” as drawn in Fig. 1.
206
100°W 75°W 50°W 25°W 0° 25°E 100°W 75 °W 50° W 25° W 0° 25°E
sin ian
D
Ba rweg
S
C
EG
W
La
IC FBC 60°N
G
60°N 60°N 60° N
br in
C
C
Ba
ad
or
s
LC
NAC Biscay
Abyssal
Plain
40°N
e
40°N 40°N 40°N
dg
Ri
S AzC
G MW
tic
North
lan
Ca
FC American
At
GM Basin Cape
Mid
Verde
Abyssal
20°N NE C 20°N 20° N 20°N
Plain
NECC/NEUC
NB
C
0° 0° 0° 0°
EUC SEUC RFZ
NBUC
AC
Brazil Ang ola
e
dg
Ri
Ri
oG
is
ran
alv
BC Argentina de Cape
W
Ri
40°S 40°S Abyssal se Basin
SAC 40°S 40°S
Plain
AR
FAC ACC
Scotia Ridge
CDW
Drake Passage
60°S 60°S 60°S 60°S
100°W 75°W 50°W 25°W 0° 25°E 100° W 75° W 50° W 25° W 0° 25°E
Fig. 1 Schematic representation of major current systems in the Atlantic Ocean. (A) Upper-ocean currents during Northern Fall superimposed on the time-mean (1982–2016) Sea Surface Temperature (source:
NOAA_OI_SST_V2 data provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd). GM marks Gulf of Mexico and AR marks Agulhas Current Retroflection, for other abbreviations see Table 1.
(B) Schematic representation of the North Atlantic Deep Water flow (solid lines), Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) and Antarctic Bottom Water (dashed lines); DS, IFR and FBC denote Denmark Strait, Iceland Faeroe Ridge and
Faeroe Bank Channel, respectively, and RFZ stands for the Romanche Fracture Zone; MW marks the entrance of Mediterranean Water. For readability of the figure no recirculation cells are drawn. Bottom topography in 2000 m
steps.
Currents | Current Systems in the Atlantic Ocean 207
the South Atlantic Ocean, have large speeds (1 ms1) and typical width scales of 100 km. The main western boundary currents
(Gulf Stream and Brazil Currents) tend to have sub-basin-scale recirculation cells due the interaction of currents with topography
and conservation of potential vorticity constraints.
In the Tropics the two subtropical gyres are connected via a complicated tropical circulation system. The tropical circulation
shows a north-westward cross-equatorial flow at the western boundary and several zonal current and countercurrent bands (Figs.
1A and 2A) of smaller meridional and vertical extent and a complex vertical structure. The north-westward flow along the western
boundary starts as a subsurface flow, the North Brazil Undercurrent, which becomes surface intensified north of the north-eastern
tip of Brazil by near-surface inflow from the South Equatorial Current and is named North Brazil Current. The North Brazil
Current crosses the equator north-westwards and retroflects eastward at about 8 N. In northern spring, when the North
Equatorial Countercurrent is weak, there seems to be a continuous flow toward the Caribbean called Guyana Current. The
westward flows are regarded as different bands of the South Equatorial Current, the northern one even crossing the equator. The
eastward subsurface flows are named the Equatorial Undercurrent at the equator, and the North and South Equatorial Under-
currents at about 5 latitude. The eastward surface intensified flows at about 9 latitude are the North and South Equatorial
Countercurrents. In northern fall the North Equatorial Countercurrent and the North Equatorial Undercurrent override one
another and it is difficult to distinguish between the two current bands. At the equator at about 700 m, there is a flow of
intermediate-density water masses formed at the Antarctic polar front (Equatorial Intermediate Current), as well as north and
south of the equator (Northern and Southern Intermediate Countercurrents) which flow in the opposite direction to the currents
above (Fig. 2A). The Intertropical Convergence Zone in the Atlantic, where the trade winds of both hemispheres converge, is
located north of the equator throughout the year, and reaches the South Atlantic in southern summer and only at the north coast
of Brazil. Seasonal changes of the wind field lead obvious variations in the tropical near-surface currents; however, with different
strengths. The strongest seasonal signal is observed in the North Equatorial Countercurrent. The eastward-flowing North
Equatorial Countercurrent is strongest in August, when the Intertropical Convergence Zone is located at its northernmost
position. At that time the North Equatorial Countercurrent crosses the entire Atlantic basins zonally, but in late boreal winter
it becomes weak or even reverses to westward in the western domain. South of the Cape Verde Islands at 9 N, 25 W, there is a
cyclonic feature named Guinea Dome throughout the year, but it is weaker in northern winter. The Southern Hemispheric
counterpart is the Angola Dome at 10 S, 9 E. The Angola Dome is seen only in southern summer and it is embedded in a
permanent larger-scale cyclonic feature centered near 13 S, 5 E called Angola Gyre.
Poleward of the subtropical gyres the current field of the North and South Atlantic are very different. The subtropical gyre of the
South Atlantic is bounded from the south by the eastward flow of water all around the globe within the Antarctic Circumpolar
Current (ACC) that is driven mainly by the mid-latitudes westerlies. The Falkland (Malvinas) Current, which flows equatorward
along the south-eastern South American shelf edge to about 38 S is a meander of a branch of the ACC.
In the North Atlantic a cyclonic subpolar gyre is present, driven in part by the wind stress curl associated with the atmospheric
Icelandic low pressure system and in part by the fresh water from the subarctic. The subpolar gyre includes the northern part of the
North Atlantic Current, the Irminger Current, the East and West Greenland Currents and the Labrador Current off north-eastern
North America. The currents of the North Atlantic subpolar gyre have a strong barotropic flow component, which lead to large water
mass transports (Table 1).
(A) (B)
0 1 0
−0
NBC EUC NEC .02
27.68
0
−0
100 0.8
[km]
0
SEC 0.3
.0
-0.3
NEUC 2
0 0.0
3
200 0.6
-0.
SEUC 1 [m/s]
27.74
−0.04
300 0.4
0.1
0
−0.14
2
pressure (dbar)
.1
−0
400 0.2
0
−0.1
.14
0 27.8
−0
2
−0
500 0
−0
.08
2
−0.02
.10
SICC
EIC
−0.06
−0.1
0
0
0.02
700 -0.4
3 27.88
800 0 -0.6 −0.2
LADCP
900 -0.8
−0.3 1997−2014
1000 -1
4°S 2° 0 2° 4° 6° 8°N 0 [km] 50 100 150 200
1
Fig. 2 Vertical structure of selected equatorial and subpolar Atlantic current systems. (A) Zonal velocity component in ms (eastward flow is positive) from direct
velocity measurements (ADCP) across the equator at 35 W in May 2002 north of the north-eastern tip of Brazil. Shown are: the North Brazil Current (NBC), the South
Equatorial Undercurrent (SEUC), the South Equatorial Current (SEC) with branches north and south of the equator separated by the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC), the
North Equatorial Undercurrent (NEUC), the Equatorial Intermediate Current (EIC), the Northern Intermediate Countercurrent (NICC), and the Southern Intermediate
Countercurrent (SICC). (B) Long-term mean of Deep Western Boundary Current in the Labrador Sea at 53 N (outflow velocity component in cm s1) from shipboard
observations. The red lines mark isopycnals separating major water masses (see text). Modified from Zantopp et. al. (2017) to comply with the SI unit convention.
208 Currents | Current Systems in the Atlantic Ocean
Table 1 Major upper-ocean currents of the Atlantic Ocean and volume transport in Sverdrups (1 Sv ¼ 106 m3 s1)
Subpolar gyre
East Greenland Current EGC 32 to bottom
West Greenland Current WGC 6 relative to 34.8 isohaline
Irminger Current IC 14 east of Cape Farewell
Labrador Current LC 35 to bottom
North Atlantic subtropical gyre
Gulf Stream GS 88–150
North Atlantic Current NAC 90 (west), 30 (east)
Azores Current AzC 10–12
Canary Current CaC 1–3
North Equatorial Current NEC 10
Florida Current FC 32 3 (at 27 N)
Equatorial currents
North Equatorial Countercurrent NECC 13 (23 W)
North Equatorial Undercurrent NEUC 10 (35 W)
Equatorial Undercurrent EUC 25 (9 W)–13 (5 E)
North Brazil Current NBC 30
North Brazil Undercurrent NBUC 25
South Equatorial Undercurrent SEUC 5–10
Angola Current AC 16 (13 S)
South Equatorial Countercurrent SECC 4 (9 S)
South Atlantic subtropical gyre
Brazil Current BC 4 (10 S)–76 (37 S)
South Atlantic Current SAC 15–30
Benguela Current BeC 28 (10 E)
South Equatorial Current SEC 16 (southern band)
Southern South Atlantic
Falkland (Malvinas) Current FAC up to 70
Antarctic Circumpolar Current ACC 110–150
regions where they can cool through interaction with the cold atmosphere and sink forming the North Atlantic Deep Water that
return south in the DWBC where it is mixed with ambient waters and eventually uplifted by mixing and upwelling. The air–sea heat
exchange over the Gulf Stream and North Atlantic Current modulates the weather conditions in north-western Europe. In the
Southern Hemisphere, the AMOC net heat transport is from the cool ACC to the warm tropics. The net meridional heat transport
across the equator is accomplished by warm upper ocean water and subpolar intermediate water from the Southern Hemisphere
moving northward in the upper 900 m mainly in the North Brazil Current, and cold North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) moving
southward between 1200 and 4000 m. A clear distinction has to be made between the cross-equatorial flow at the western boundary
and the meridional interhemispheric water mass exchange. The latter is the amount of transfer from the Southern to the Northern
Hemisphere in the upper ocean, and to a small degree in the Antarctic Bottom Water, compensated by the transfer from the
Northern to the Southern Hemisphere by the North Atlantic Deep Water. The cross-equatorial flow within the North Brazil Current
is much larger (Table 1), since part of this cross-equatorial flow originates from the zonal equatorial circulation, retroflects north of
the equator, and returns into the equatorial circulation system.
So far we described the gross time-average and large-scale circulation patterns of the Atlantic. In the past 10–15 years, advances in
observing technology and in numerical representation of the ocean in motion have disclosed ubiquitous variability of Atlantic
circulation on multiple space and time scales.
and subsurface floats are particularly suited to study the turbulent flows. Here the instantaneous trajectories of drifters are shown
tracking the near-surface currents (Movie 1 in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11291-6). The
most conspicuous are the Gulf Stream rings, persisting for several months and transporting warm water out, and cold water in the
subpolar gyre. They are believed to play an important role in the air–sea exchange, intensifying the hurricanes. In the Labrador Sea,
the eddies contribute to the supply of waters in and out of the open convection regions hence impacting the dense water formation.
In the retroflection zone of the North Brazil Current, eddies detach from the current and progress north-westward toward the
Caribbean. Large rings dominate also the inflow of Agulhas Current to the Atlantic, while Meddies and Sub-Surface Eddies populate
the deeper waters and contribute to the spreading of the NADW. At the equator, a counterpart of eddies are equatorial waves excited
by the wind stress variations and propagating in zonal-vertical direction carrying temperature signals and triggering mixing
processes, and contributing to the formation of deep equatorial jets.
The mesoscale variability visualized in movie are to be compared with a steady-state schematics of currents shown in Fig. 1A. The
schematic currents’ pathways, inferred with the core method from their characteristic water mass signatures, should be understood
in the time-averaged sense only as they do not represent the trajectories of individual water parcels and the water properties they
carry.
Future Aspects
Ocean research is always influenced by political and economic interests. The improvement in understanding of the surface currents
at the time of the voyages of discovery was caused by the need for good and safe sailing routes. The more detailed look at the
currents of the surface as well as the deep Atlantic were influenced by the interest in the resources of the sea for food, and the search
for economic sources. Nowadays, we have a strong evidence that the current systems in the Atlantic, quantified as Atlantic
Meridional Overturning Circulation, and the amount of mass, heat, salt and carbon they carry, play a crucial role in natural and
anthropogenic global climate variability (according to the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change Assessment Report). The
oceans are estimated to have absorbed 90% of the global heat and this heat uptake is observed to penetrate deep into the Atlantic
and Southern Oceans, with consequences for the regional sea level rise and oceanic oxygen content worldwide, and hence for coastal
communities and fisheries. The technical advances in observational and modeling techniques have allowed the mapping of the
Atlantic Ocean currents’ time-mean state, and a first estimate of their variability on short-term to decadal timescales, but the
understanding of mechanisms governing this variability is still elementary, and its representation in the global ocean models used
for climate prediction is uncertain. Sustained observations are also necessary for assessing the possibility of future abrupt change in
the AMOC similar to those seen in paleoclimate records. Several observing systems have been at place for the last two decades. The
AMOC has been monitored by US–UK MOCHA–RAPID, a trans-Atlantic array of moored instruments at 26 N combined with ship-
borne, satellite and bottom pressure observations. The moored PIRATA array oversees the Atlantic variability at the equator. The
subpolar Atlantic is another key location because of the NADW formation processes and the temperature and salinity changes it
undergoes along the northern limb of the DBWC pathway. The aforementioned 53 N array, contributes to OSNAP, a multiplatform
observing system for NADW across the Irminger and Labrador Seas spearheading future sustained monitoring efforts; and an apt
monitoring system for the Gulf Stream variability is yet to come. Large international initiatives like GOOS and AtlanOS strive to
optimize and further develop these and other existing observational efforts for the Atlantic. Another priority is to improve the ocean
model representation of short time scale and mesoscale variability for better predictions of the future AMOC state. These efforts are
coordinated by the CLIVAR modeling community building upon the observations serving for validation of model results.
Despite the future focus on the Atlantic’s role in climate changes as well as interactive processes, and although the major
components of the near-surface circulation from ship drift observations have been known for >100 years, there is a continuous
need to investigate details of the Atlantic Ocean subsurface and abyssal circulation and its physical processes, which so far are
unrevealed.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11291-6.
Currents | Current Systems in the Atlantic Ocean 211
Further Reading
Bayev SA and Polansky AB (1991) Oceanology 31: 155–159.
Carton JA and Hakkinen S (eds.) (2011) Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, Climate and Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, 58, pp. 1741–1944.
Issues 17–18. ISSN 0967-0645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.055. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096706451100018X.
Cunningham SA, et al. (2003) Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001147.
Fischer A, et al. (2010) Geophysical Research Letters 37(24). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045321.
Fischer, et al. (2008) Geophysical Research Letters 35. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035753.
Haine, T., Böning, C. W., Brandt, P., Fischer, J., Funk, A., Kieke, D., Kvaleberg, E., Rhein, M. and Visbeck, M. (2008) North Atlantic deep water formation in the Labrador Sea,
recirculation through the Subpolar Gyre, and discharge to the subtropics. In: Arctic-subarctic ocean fluxes, Defining the role of the Northern Seas in climate., ed. by Dickson, R. R.,
Meincke, J. and Rhines, P. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 653–702. ISBN 978-1-4020-6773-0.
Hernandez-Guerro A, et al. (2002) Deep-Sea Research Part II 49(17): 3415–3426. http:oceancurrents.rsmas.miami.edu.
Mercier R, et al. (2003) Deep-Sea Research Part I 50: 863–887.
Myers PG, et al. (2009) Progress in Oceanography 80(1–2): 93–112.
Peterson DE (1992) Deep-Sea Research 39: 623–644.
Peterson RG, Stramma L, and Kortum G (1996) Early concepts and charts of ocean circulation. Progress in Oceanography 37: 1–115.
Pickard R, et al. (2005) Journal of Physical Oceanography 35: 1037–1053.
Robinson AR and Brink KH (1998) The sea, ideas and observations on progress in the study of the seas. The global coastal ocean: Regional studies and syntheses, vol. 11. New York:
Wiley.
Schott B, et al. (2002) Geophysical Research Letters 29(17): 21-1–21-4.
Segar DA (1998) Introduction to Ocean Sciences. London: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Siedler G, Griffies S, Gould J, and Church J (eds.) (2013) International geophysics. In: Ocean circulation and climate. A 21 century perspective, vol. 103, pp. 1–868. Academic Press.
Stramma L and Müller TJ (1989) Journal of Geophysical Research 94: 3181–3186.
Stramma L and Peterson RG (1990) Journal of Physical Oceanography 20: 846–859.
Stramma L, et al. (2008) Journal of Geophysical Research 113: https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004369.
Tomczak M and Godfrey JS (1994) Regional oceanography. An introduction. Oxford: Elsevier.
Vage K, et al. (2001) Deep-Sea Research Part I 58: 590–614.
Wefer G, Berger WH, Siedler G, and Webb DJ (1996) The South Atlantic: Present and past circulation. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Zantopp R, Fischer J, Visbeck M, and Karstensen J (2017) From interannual to decadal: 17 years of boundary current transports at the exit of the Labrador Sea. Journal of Geophysical
Research: Oceans 122: 1724–1748. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012271.
Zenk W, Peterson RG, and Lutjeharms JRE (eds.) (1999) New view of the Atlantic: A tribute to Gerold Siedler. Deep Sea Research, Part II 46: 527.