5 YEARS 6TH SEM

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL LAWS I

GRP NAME OF THE STUDENTS TOPICS
B.A LL.B
1 HOSTORY AND EVALUTION OF LAW
KRISHIDGAJMER SINGH JURISPRUDENCE IN INDIA
NIKHIL AGARWAL
MAHIMACHHETRI,
2 VITO K CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING
SHOHE LABOUR LAW IN INDIA
TSHERING WANGMO,
PRITHABHOWMICK
3 KEYA SUTRADHAR, ANALYSE OLD AND NEW DEFINITION OF INDUSTRY
UGYEN CHODEN, GIVEN UNDER THE INDUSTRIUAL DISPUTE ACT, 1947
MEGHANA JOSHI, ,

4 SONAM OM, CONSTITUTIONALITY OF MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT,

SUBHANKAR ADHIKARY 1961.
BINITA SHARMA

5 ANALYE THE PROVISIONS RELATING TO HEALTH

NIKESH PARAJULI
RACHANADHAR, AND SAFETY STANDARDS OF THE WORKERS AS
SITAMCHHETRI PROVIDED UNDER FACTORIES ACT, 1948.

6 OBJECT OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947

AND AUTHORITIES UNDER THE ACT IN THE LIGHT
APARAJITA GHOSH, OF BANARAS ICE FACTORY LTD. V. ITS WORKMEN,
DIKSHATHAPA, AIR 1957 SC 167
SUSMITACHATTERJEE,

7 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS

SHIVANI KUMARI, TATA IRON AND STEEL CO. V. WORKMEN, AIR 1972
SHRISTIKA KARKI SC 1917
MADHU GUPTA,

8 MEGHA DEY, ANALYSE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY AOF STRIKE

MD IFTEKHAR AND LOCK OUT CALLED.
SAPTARSHIBANIK

9 RIGHT OF PAYMENT OF MATERNITY BENEFIT

BIKAS PRASAD,
 DIYATHAPA UNDER THE MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT, 1961
RAJASHREE BISWAS.
10 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CONCEPT OF LAY
BHAGYATHAPA OFF, RETRENCHMENT, CLOSURE WITH THE HELP OF
SHUBHAM DAS DECIDED CASE LAWS,
SAMRIDHI CHETTRI,
11 NIKITA THAPA, ANALYSE THE CONSTITUTION AND POWER AND
PRIYANKASAHA FUNCTIONS OF VARIOUS AUTHORITIES
MAHESH MAHATO, CONSTITUTED UNDER THE INDUSTRIUAL DISPUTE
ACT, 1947

12 SWETA RANA EXAMINE THE CONCEPT OF UNFAIR LABOUR

ANINDITA DUTTA PRACTICE AND ITS IMPACT.
NOOR NOWAZ
13 MIMOSHATAMANG ANALYSE THE4 PROVISIONS RELATING TO HEALTH
RUMIKAMINJ AND SAFETY MEASURES OF UNDER FACTORIES ACT,
DIPAYAN KUMR ROY
1948.

14 PUJA DAS ANALYSE THE CONCEPT OF HAZARDOUS

RUBI SHARMA PROCESSESS.
JABED ISLAM
15 NANDITASAHA THE PROVISIONS RELATING TO EMPLOY MENT OF
RAFATJAHAN YOUNG PERSONS

16 RISHAV DAS, THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF WORKMEN’S

SUBHAMI ROY, COMPENSATION ACT, 1923.
ASHWINI CHAUHAN
17 NIRVANA LAMA EMPIRICAL TOPICS
PRIYAVERMA,
V. SHIKAHITOSWU

18 SURVEY ON FACILITIES PROVIDED TO THE

SABANAKHATUN WORKERS IN UNORGANIZED SECTORS.
NIHARIKA GOMDEN
MAHESH MAHATO,

19 PRIYANKA RAI
SWEETY SARKAR SURVEY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF
UMANGGURUNG, FACTORIES ACT RELATING TO EMPLOYMENT OF
YOUNG PERSONS IN TWO FACTORIES.
20 HELIVIZHIMOMI
NOUSEEN NIKHAT SURVEY ON WORKING OF CHILDRENMS ON
SUPRIYATAMANG HAZARDOPUS PROCESSES IN N.J.P AREA. M
21 DIKILA SHERPA
PRERNA GUPTA STUDY ON FACILITIES PROVIDED TO A WOMAN
RITU SHARMA EMPLOYEE IN ANY TWO FACTORIES
22 DIKSHA TIWARI STUDY ON HEALTH AND SAFETY MEASURES
SAURAVCHHETRI PROVIDED AS PER FACTORIES ACT BY THE
HEENAKABIR EMPLOYER FOR THE EMPLOYEES IN ANY TWO TEA
GARDENS.
23 SATARUPA GHOSH THE SURVEY OF THE HEALTH STANDARDS OF THE
RADHABHUJEL WORKERS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS.
SIBU BHAGAT
24 NIKITA RAI, THE SURVEY OF EMPLOYMENT OF YOUNG PERSONS
GAURAV CHETTRI IN THE TEA-STALLS AND LINE HOTELS
HARSH RAJ

GROUP NAME NAME OF TOPIC

NO. B.B.A LL.B. THE
STUDENTS
B.COM
1. NEHA MITTAL, NUNA HANG
SUBBA, STUDY ON FACILITIES PROVIDED TO A
ANIL SUBBA EMPLOYEE IN ANY TWO TEA GARDENS
(EMPIRICAL)

2 ARCHIE HINA STUDY ON HEALTH AND SAFETY

AGARWAL, AGARWAL MEASURES PROVIDED AS PER FACTORIES
RAYMOND ACT BY THE EMPLOYER FOR THE FEMALE
LEPCHA, EMPLOYEES IN ANY TWO FACOTORIES.
(EMPIRICAL)

3 ADITI THE SURVEY OF THE HEALTH STANDARDS

AGARWAL OF THE FEMALE WORKERS IN THE
SWETA MITTAL CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS.
RATIKANTA (EMPIRICAL)
PAL
4 ADITYA THAKUR AMARTYA ROY THE SURVEY OF WORKING HOURS OF
CHOWDHURY YOUNG PERSONS EMPLOYED IN THE TEA-
ANURAG RAJ STALLS AND LINE HOTELS. (EMPIRICAL)
DEWAN
5 ADITYA SUKHLA, SUBHAM ANALYE THE PROVISIONS RELATING TO
THAPA HEALTH AND SAFETY STANDARDS OF THE
SHIVANI WORKERS AS PROVIDED UNDER
AGARWAL, FACTORIES ACT, 1948.

6 POOJA SARAF SUBHAM OBJECT OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES

BANSAL, ACT, 1947 AND AUTHORITIES UNDER THE
ACT IN THE LIGHT OF BANARAS ICE
FACTORY LTD. V. ITS WORKMEN, AIR 1957
SC 167

7 UJJWAL OINDRILA ROY STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS

KATIWARA, MUHURI, TATA IRON AND STEEL CO. V. WORKMEN,
NEHA SUMAN AIR 1972 SC 1917

8. DIPJYOTI BIRENDRA ANALYSE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY AOF

HAZARIKA, CHETTRI STRIKE AND LOCK OUT CALLED.

9 HARIOM KUMAR, PRITHA RIGHT OF PAYMENT OF MATERNITY

SARKAR BENEFIT UNDER THE MATERNITY BENEFIT
NIKITA KUNDU. ACT, 1961

10 AKSHAY MISHRA, KAMALESH COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CONCEPT OF

DAS LAY OFF, RETRENCHMENT, CLOSURE WITH
SIMRAN GARG THE HELP OF DECIDED CASE LAWS,

11 NIMA TANDIN NANCY ANALYSE THE CONSTITUTION AND POWER

GURUNG, AND FUNCTIONS OF VARIOUS
AUTHORITIES CONSTITUTED UNDER THE
INDUSTRIUAL DISPUTE ACT, 1947

12 BARSHA EXAMINE THE CONCEPT OF UNFAIR

TAMANG, LABOUR PRACTICE AND ITS IMPACT.

RAJAT BALMIKI
13 PRITAM MUHURI, ANALYSE THE4 PROVISIONS RELATING TO
ATIF NASIM HEALTH AND SAFETY MEASURES OF
JILLAN UNDER FACTORIES ACT, 1948.

14 SASWATA DEEPSAGAR ANALYSE THE CONCEPT OF HAZARDOUS

CHATTERJEE DUTRAJ, PROCESSESS.
SACHI DANIKA

15 DERSHIKA SOURAV DAS THE PROVISIONS RELATING TO EMPLOY

SHARMA MENT OF YOUNG PERSONS
MANU MISHRA,

16 AMRIT CHETTRI TASHI TOBJEN THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF WORKMEN’S

SAYEDA RIZMI DORJI COMPENSATION ACT, 1923.

17 SUDHARSAN RAI APARAJITA ANALYSE OLD AND NEW DEFINITION OF

YENTEN PRIYADARSHA INDUSTRY GIVEN UNDER THE
JAMSTHO, NI INDUSTRIUAL DISPUTE ACT, 1947

18 SANGELA RISHAV CONSTITUTIONALITY OF MATERNITY

THOCKAR AGARWAL, BENEFIT ACT, 1961.
TAMANG
DPANWITA
SINHA,
19

5YRS 6TH SEMESTER

INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES AND PRINCIPLES OF

LEGISLATION

GRP NAME OF THE STUDENTS TOPICS

B.A LL.B.

1 DLF QUTAB ENCLAVE COMPLEX

EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST V
STATE OF HARYANA, 2003 AIR SCW
NIKHIL AGARWAL 1046
MAHIMACHHETRI,

2 .KRISHNA KUMAR V STATE OF

RAJASTHAN, AIR 1992 SC 1789
KRISHIDGAJMER SINGH
TSHERING WANGMO,

3 A K GOPALAN V STATE OF MADRAS,

VITO K AIR 1950 SC 27
SHOHE
PRITHABHOWMICK

4 KEYA SUTRADHAR, ALLAHABAD BANK VS.

UGYEN CHODEN,
 , CANARA BANK, JT 2000 (4) SC
411

5 GOODYEAR INDIA LTD. V STATE OF

HARYANA, AIR 1990 SC 781

BINITA SHARMA
MEGHANA JOSHI,

6 VELAMURI VENKATA SHIVPRASAD V

SONAM OM, KOTHURI VENKATESHWARLU, JT 1999
SUBHANKAR ADHIKARY (9) SC 249

7 CIT V SODRA DEVI, AIR 1957 SC 832

NIKESH PARAJULI
RACHANADHAR,

8 U.P.BHOODAN YAGNA SAMITI V BRAJ

DIKSHA TIWARI KISHORE, AIR 1988 SC 2239
SAURAVCHHETRI

9 NARENDRA MADIVALAPA KHENI V

MANIKRAO PATIL, AIR 1977 SC 2171
HEENAKABIR
SITAMCHHETRI

8 BIPINCHANDRA PARSHOTTAMDAS
MADHU GUPTA, PATEL V STATE OF GUJARAT, (2003) 4
MEGHA DEY, SCC 642
10 WORKMEN OF DIMAKUCHI TEA
SHIVANI KUMARI, ESTATE V MANAGEMENT OF
SHRISTIKA KARKI DIMAKUCHI TEA ESTATE, AIR 1958 SC
353
11 MD IFTEKHAR S R NAYAK V A R ANTULAY, 1984 AIR
SAPTARSHIBANIK 684, 1984 SCR (2) 495
12 M/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. versus Collector
of Customs, Bombay
BIKAS PRASAD,
DIYATHAPA Civil Appeal No. 1951 of 1998
13 DISTRICT MINING OFFICER V TATA
RAJASHREE IRON AND STEEL CO, Dtae of judgment –
BISWAS.BHAGYATHAPA 31-07-2001B.
14 PRABHAKAR RAO V STATE OF
ANDHRA PRADESH

W.P.(C) No.-005447-005546 / 1985, DOJ –

SHUBHAM DAS 19-08-1985
SAMRIDHI CHETTRI,
15 NIKITA THAPA, K P VARGHESE V THE INCOME TAX
PRIYANKASAHA
OFFICER, ERNAKULAM AND ANOTHER

Appeal Civil 412 of 1973

16 MUNICIPAL BOARD, PUSHKAR V

STATE TRANSPORT
MAHESH MAHATO, AUTHORITY,RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
SWETA RANA Appeal (civil) 332 of 1962
17 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES V
STATE OF A P
ANINDITA DUTTA C.A. No.-002582-002582 / 1998
NOOR NOWAZ
18 BENGAL IMMUNITY CO. LTD V STATE
OF BIHAR & ORS
NIKITA RAI,
GAURAV CHETTRI Appeal (civil) 159 of 1953, DOJ 06-09-
1955
19 PRITHIPAL SINGH ETC V STATE OF
PUNJAB & ANR. ETC.

Case No.-Crl.A. No.-000523-000527 /

RUBI SHARMA 2009, DOJ – 04-11-2011
JABED ISLAM
20 UOI V B.S. AGARWAL

PUJA DAS C.A. No.-006713-006713 / 1997, DOJ – 29-

HARSH RAJ 09-1997
21 . ALEMBIC CHEMICAL WORKS CO.,
LTD. V THE WORKMEN

SATARUPA GHOSH Appeal Civil 475 of 1960, DOJ –

RADHABHUJEL 15-12-1960
22 MOLAR MAL (DEAD) THRU. LRS.V
SIBU BHAGAT M/S.KAY IRON WORKS (P) LTD.
ASHWINI CHAUHAN
21 C.A. No.-004947-004948 / 1998,
DOJ – 14-03-2000

PUNJAB LAND DEVELOPMENT

ANDRECLAMATION CORPORATION
LTD.,CHANDIGARH V PRESIDING
OFFICER, LABOUR
COURT,CHANDIGARH ETC.

RISHAV DAS, Appeal (civil) 3241 of 1981, DOJ – 04-05-

SUBHAMI ROY, 1990
23 NIRVANA LAMA UOI V ELPHINSTONE SPINNING &
PRIYAVERMA,
WEAVING CO.LTD., 2001, AIR 2001 SC
 724
24

SADCHIDANANDA MISRA V STATE OF

V. SHIKAHITOSWU
SABANAKHATUN ORISSA, ORISSA (2004) 8 SCC 599
25 . INDIRA SAWHNEY V UOI, AIR 2000 SC
498

DIPAYAN KUMR ROY

NIHARIKA GOMDEN
26 PRIYANKA RAI VIRENDRA SINGH HOODA V STATE OF
SWEETY SARKAR
HARYANA, AIR 2005 SC 137
UMANGGURUNG,

27 . RAMAVATAR BUDHAIPRASAD V
ASSISTANT SALES TAX OFFICER, AIR
1961 SC 1325
HELIVIZHIMOMI
NOUSEEN NIKHAT

28 MOTIPUR ZAMINDARI CO V STATE OF

SUPRIYATAMANG
BIHAR, AIR 1962 SC
DIKILA SHERPA

29 UNITED OFFSET PROCESS PVT.LTD. V

ASSTT. COLLECTER OF CUSTOMS, AIR
1989 SC 622
PRERNA GUPTA
RITU SHARMA
30 .SARIN CHEMICAL LABORATORY V
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, U.P.,
AIR 1971 SC 65
APARAJITA GHOSH,
DIKSHATHAPA,

31 . FOREST RANGE OFFICER V

NANDITASAHA
KHUSHBOO ENTERPRISES, AIR 1994 SC
AJBINRAI 120
32 U.P.BHOODAN YAGNA SAMITI V BRAJ
KISHORE, AIR 1988 SC 2239
RAFATJAHAN
SUSMITACHATTERJEE,

33 SARIN CHEMICAL LABORATORY V

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, U.P.,
MIMOSHATAMANG AIR 1971 SC 65
RUMIKAMINJ

SADCHIDANANDA MISRA V STATE OF

ORISSA, ORISSA (2004) 8 SCC 599

. INDIRA SAWHNEY V UOI, AIR 2000 SC

498

VIRENDRA SINGH HOODA V STATE OF

HARYANA, AIR 2005 SC 137

B.COM LL.B B.B.A

NEHA MITTAL, NUNA HANG S R NAYAK V A R ANTULAY,
SUBBA, 1984 AIR 684, 1984 SCR (2) 495

ARCHIE HINA AGARWAL M/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. versus

AGARWAL, Collector of Customs, Bombay
Civil Appeal No. 1951 of 1998
ADITI AGARWAL DISTRICT MINING OFFICER V
SWETA MITTAL TATA IRON AND STEEL CO,
Dtae of judgment – 31-07-2001B.
ADITYA AMARTYA ROY PRABHAKAR RAO V STATE OF
THAKUR CHOWDHURY ANDHRA PRADESH
W.P.(C) No.-005447-005546 / 1985,
DOJ – 19-08-1985
ADITYA SUBHAM THAPA K P VARGHESE V THE INCOME
SUKHLA, TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM
AND ANOTHER
Appeal Civil 412 of 1973
POOJA SARAF SUBHAM BANSAL, MUNICIPAL BOARD, PUSHKAR
V STATE TRANSPORT
AUTHORITY,RAJASTHAN AND
ORS.
Appeal (civil) 332 of 1962
UJJWAL OINDRILA ROY TATA CONSULTANCY
KATIWARA, MUHURI, SERVICES V STATE OF A P
C.A. No.-002582-002582 /
1998
DIPJYOTI BIRENDRA BENGAL IMMUNITY CO. LTD
HAZARIKA, CHETTRI V STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
Appeal (civil) 159 of 1953,
DOJ 06-09-1955
HARIOM NIKITA KUNDU. PRITHIPAL SINGH ETC V
KUMAR, STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. ETC.
Case No.-Crl.A. No.-000523-
000527 / 2009, DOJ – 04-11-
2011
AKSHAY UOI V B.S. AGARWAL
MISHRA, C.A. No.-006713-006713 / 1997,
DOJ – 29-09-1997
SIMRAN GARG

KAMALESH DAS . ALEMBIC CHEMICAL WORKS

CO., LTD. V THE WORKMEN
Appeal Civil 475 of 1960,
DOJ – 15-12-1960
BARSHA PRITHA SARKAR MOLAR MAL (DEAD) THRU.
TAMANG, LRS.V M/S.KAY IRON WORKS
(P) LTD.
NIMA TANDIN NEHA SUMAN C.A. No.-004947-004948 /
1998, DOJ – 14-03-2000
PUNJAB LAND DEVELOPMENT
ANDRECLAMATION
CORPORATION
LTD.,CHANDIGARH V
PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR
COURT,CHANDIGARH ETC.
Appeal (civil) 3241 of 1981, DOJ –
04-05-1990
PRITAM UOI V ELPHINSTONE
MUHURI, ATIF SPINNING & WEAVING
NASIM JILLAN CO.LTD., 2001, AIR 2001 SC 724
SACHI SHIVANI
DHANUKA, AGARWAL, . BHUBANESHWAR SINGH V
UOI, JT 1994 (5) SC 83

. SADCHIDANANDA MISRA V
STATE OF ORISSA, ORISSA
(2004) 8 SCC 599
DERSHIKA ANURAG RAJ . INDIRA SAWHNEY V UOI, AIR
SHARMA DEWAN 2000 SC 498

MANU MISHRA, RAYMOND LEPCHA, VIRENDRA SINGH HOODA V

STATE OF HARYANA, AIR 2005
SC 137
ANIL SUBBA . RAMAVATAR
RATIKANTA PAL, BUDHAIPRASAD V ASSISTANT
SALES TAX OFFICER, AIR 1961
SC 1325

SYEDA KHIZRA NANCY GURUNG, MOTIPUR ZAMINDARI CO V

RIZVI STATE OF BIHAR, AIR 1962 SC
SOURAV DAS UNITED OFFSET PROCESS
PVT.LTD. V ASSTT.
YENTEN
COLLECTER OF CUSTOMS, AIR
JAMSTHO,.
1989 SC 622
 AMRIT CHETTRI TASHI TOBJEN .SARIN CHEMICAL
DORJI LABORATORY V
COMMISSIONER OF SALES
TAX, U.P., AIR 1971 SC 65

SASWATA DEEPSAGAR . FOREST RANGE OFFICER V

CHATTERJEE DUTRAJ, KHUSHBOO ENTERPRISES, AIR
1994 SC 120

SUDHARSAN APARAJITA U.P.BHOODAN YAGNA SAMITI

RAI PRIYADARSHANI V BRAJ KISHORE, AIR 1988 SC
2239

SANGELA RISHAV AGARWAL, WORKMEN OF DIMAKUCHI

THOCKAR TEA ESTATE V MANAGEMENT
TAMANG
OF DIMAKUCHI TEA ESTATE,
AIR 1958 SC 353

DPANWITA NARENDRA
SINHA, MADIVALAPA KHENI
V MANIKRAO PATIL,
RAJAT BALMIKI
AIR 1977 SC 2171

5 YEARS 6TH SEMB.B.A./B.COM.

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
 B.A

SL NAME OF STUDENTS PROJECT TOPIC (DOCTRINAL AND NON-

 DOCTRINAL )
1 KRISHIDGAJMER SINGH ART.21 OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND
NIKHIL AGARWAL RIGHT TO CLEAN ENVIRONMENT
MAHIMACHHETRI,
2 VITO K PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE AND ART.21: AN
SHOHE ANALYSIS.
TSHERING WANGMO,
PRITHABHOWMICK
3 KEYA SUTRADHAR, POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE AND ART .21: AN
UGYEN CHODEN, JURISTIC ANALYSIS.
MEGHANA JOSHI, ,

4 SONAM OM, MAKE A BRIEF NOTE ON NATIONAL GREEN

SUBHANKAR ADHIKARY TRIBUNAL ACT 2010.
BINITA SHARMA

5 NIKESH PARAJULI MAKE A BRIEF NOTE ON WILDLIFE

RACHANADHAR, PROTECTION ACT 1972.
SITAMCHHETRI
6 APARAJITA GHOSH, DISCUSS THE SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES OF
DIKSHATHAPA, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN INDIA
SUSMITA CHATTERJEE,
7 SHIVANI KUMARI, MAKE A BRIEF NOTE ON FOREST
SHRISTIKA KARKI CONSERVATION ACT 1980.
MADHU GUPTA,
8 MEGHA DEY, A STUDY OF THE ROLE OF LOCAL SELF
MD IFTEKHAR GOVERNMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF
SAPTARSHI BANIK RIVER IN NORTH BENGAL REGION.
(EMPIRICAL)

9 BIKAS PRASAD, MAKE A BRIEF NOTE ON ENVIRONMENT

DIYATHAPA, PROTECTION ACT 1986
RAJASHREE BISWAS

10 BHAGYATHAPA IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL

SHUBHAM DAS ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN INDIAN
SAMRIDHI CHETTRI, CONSTITUTION.

NIKITA THAPA, IMPACT OF THE USAGE OF THE FIRE

11 PRIYANKASAHA CRACKER IN THE AREA OF HAKIMPARA,
MAHESH MAHATO, BABUPARA AND DESHBANDHU PARA
(EMPIRICAL)

12 SWETA RANA HUMAN HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL

ANINDITA DUTTA PROTECTION IN LIGHT OF BHOPAL GAS
NOOR NOWAZ DISASTER CASE
13 MIMOSHATAMANG POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE AND INDIAN
RUMIKAMINJ CONSTITUTION: AN ANALYSIS.
DIPAYAN KUMR ROY
14 PUJA DAS A BRIEF NOTE ON INTERNATIONAL
RUBI SHARMA GUIDELINES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
JABED ISLAM PROTECTION
15 NANDITA SAHA ABSTRACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS IN
RAFAT JAHAN INDIA
16 RISHAV DAS, A STUDY OF HEALTH IMPACTS UPON
SUBHAMI ROY, RESIDENTS AROUND BAGDOGRA AREA DUE
ASHWINI CHAUHAN TOCONSTRUCTION OF ASIAN HIGH WAY II.
(EMPIRICAL)

17 NIRVANA LAMA
PRIYAVERMA, ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION: IMPACT ON
V. SHIKAHITOSWU HUMAN LIFE
18 SABANA KHATUN CONCEPTUALIZE RELEVANT CASE LAWS ON
NIHARIKA GOMDEN WILDLIFE AND FOREST PROTECTION IN
INDIA

19 PRIYANKA RAI A STUDY OF TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC

SWEETY SARKAR WASTE BY SILIGURI MUNICIPAL
UMANG GURUNG, CORPORATION. (EMPIRICAL
20 HELIVI ZHIMOMI, WRITE AN ABSTRACT ON WATER
NOUSEEN NIKHAT (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF
SUPRIYATAMANG POLLUTION) ACT 1974.

DIKILA SHERPA STUDY ON IMPACT OF DEFORESTATION ON

21 PRERNA GUPTA WILD LIFE IN THE LIGHT OF WILD LIFE
RITU SHARMA PROTECTION ACT. (EMPIRICAL)

22 DIKSHA TIWARI WRITE AN ABSTRACT ON AIR (PREVENTION

SAURAV CHHETRI AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT 1981.
HEENAKABIR
23 SATARUPA GHOSH WRITE A SHORT NOTE ON HAZARDOUS
RADHA BHUJEL WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS IN
SIBU BHAGAT INDIA

24 NIKITA RAI, A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF VECULAR

GAURAV CHETTRI POLLUTION IN THE SILIGURI AREA.
HARSH RAJ (EMPIRICAL)
GROUP NAME NAME OF TOPIC
NO. B.B.A LL.B. THE
STUDENTS
B.COM
1. NUNA HANG
SUBBA,
ANIL SUBBA
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT, 1986
IN A NUTSHELL.
2 ARCHIE HINA
AGARWAL, AGARWAL
RAYMOND
LEPCHA, CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS RELATING
TO PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT.
3 ADITI ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION UNDER
AGARWAL NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL
SWETA MITTAL INSTRUMENTS.
RATIKANTA
PAL
4 ADITYA THAKUR SUBHAM A STUDY OF TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC
NEHA MITTAL, BANSAL, WASTE MANAGEMENT BY SILIGURI
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.(EMPIRICAL)

5 ADITYA SUKHLA, SUBHAM ROLE OF INDIAN JUDICIARY IN

THAPA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
SHIVANI
AGARWAL,

6 POOJA SARAF ANURAG RAJ

DEWAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: MEANING,
AMARTYA ROY SCOPE AND CASE LAWS.
CHOWDHURY

7 UJJWAL OINDRILA ROY WILDLIFE PROTECTION LAW IN INDIA- AN

KATIWARA, MUHURI, OVERVIEW.
NEHA SUMAN

8. DIPJYOTI BIRENDRA CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF FOREST LAW IN

HAZARIKA, CHETTRI INDIA.
9 HARIOM KUMAR, PRITHA PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE.
SARKAR
NIKITA KUNDU.

10 AKSHAY MISHRA, KAMALESH A STUDY ON THE RIGHTS OF THE FOREST

DAS DWELLERS AND PROTECTION OF FOREST.
SIMRAN GARG (EMPIRICAL)

11 NIMA TANDIN NANCY POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE:

GURUNG, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDIA
AND USA.

12 BARSHA NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL AND ITS

TAMANG, LANDMARK CASE LAWS.

RAJAT BALMIKI

13 PRITAM MUHURI, THE AIR (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF

ATIF NASIM POLLUTION), ACT, 1981- CRITICALLY
JILLAN ANALYSE.

14 SASWATA DEEPSAGAR A STUDY OF BIO MEDICAL WASTE

CHATTERJEE DUTRAJ, DISPOSAL BY NORTH BENGAL MEDICAL
SACHI DANIKA COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL AND ITS IMPACT
ON ENVIRONMENT. (EMPIRICAL)

15 DERSHIKA SOURAV DAS WATER (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF

SHARMA POLLUTION), ACT, 1974.
MANU MISHRA,

16 AMRIT CHETTRI TASHI TOBJEN A STUDY OF THE ROLE OF LOCAL SELF

SAYEDA RIZMI DORJI GOVERNMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF
RIVER MAHANANDA. (EMPIRICAL)
17 SUDHARSAN RAI APARAJITA A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF VECULAR
YENTEN PRIYADARSHA POLLUTION IN THE SILIGURI AREA.
JAMSTHO, NI (EMPIRICAL)

18 SANGELA RISHAV STUDY ON IMPACT OF DEFORESTATION ON

THOCKAR AGARWAL, WILD LIFE IN THE LIGHT OF WILD LIFE
TAMANG PROTECTION ACT.
DPANWITA (EMPIRICAL)
SINHA,

LAW OF CRIMES II

GRP NAME OF THE STUDENTS TOPICS

B.A LL.B
1 BAIL AS A MATTER OF RIGHT CRITICALLY
KRISHIDGAJMER SINGH EVALUATE
NIKHIL AGARWAL
MAHIMACHHETRI,
2 ANALYSE THE DIFFERENT FUNCTIONARIES UNDER
VITO K
THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE WITH A SPECIAL
SHOHE
TSHERING WANGMO, REFERENCE TO THE POWERS OF THE PUBLIC
PRITHABHOWMICK PROSECUTORS

3 CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE OBJECT OF JUVENILE

KEYA SUTRADHAR,
JUSTICE ACT 2000 AND ITS PROVISIONS WITH A
UGYEN CHODEN,
MEGHANA JOSHI, , CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF PRATAP SINGH V.
STATE OF JHARKHAND, 20005 (2) SC 271
4 SONAM OM, ‘THE PRODUCE OF ARREST MUST BE FAIR AND JUST
SUBHANKAR ADHIKARY KEEPING IN MIND THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL
BINITA SHARMA JUSTICE’. ELUCIDATE

5 ANALYSE THE PRINCIPLE OF ‘INNOCENT TILL

PROVEN GUILTY’ WITH REFERENCE TO THE
NIKESH PARAJULI
RACHANADHAR, PROVISIONS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE AS ONE
SITAMCHHETRI OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PRINCIPLE OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE.

6 APARAJITA GHOSH, ANALYSE THE POWERS OF THE POLICE UNDER THE

DIKSHATHAPA, CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
SUSMITACHATTERJEE,

7 ‘F.I.R AS THE 1ST WHEEL OF THE CRIMINAL

SHIVANI KUMARI,
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE’ CRITICALLY
SHRISTIKA KARKI
MADHU GUPTA, ANALYSE.

8 MEGHA DEY, ANALYSE WITH LANDMARK JUDGMENTS THE

MD IFTEKHAR POWER OF REFERENCE AND REVISION UNDER THE
SAPTARSHIBANIK CODE.

9 BIKAS PRASAD, TYPES OF TRIALS UNDER CRPC

DIYATHAPA
RAJASHREE BISWAS.
10 WITH THE REFERENCE OF THE LANDMARK
JUDGMENT IN PAWAN KUMAR PANDEY V. STATE OF
BHAGYATHAPA U.P 1997 CRI LJ 2686 (ALL) CRITICALLY ANALYSE
SHUBHAM DAS THE PROVISION OF BAIL UNDER THE CODE.
SAMRIDHI CHETTRI,
11 NIKITA THAPA, COGNIZANCE OF OFFENCE AND LIMITATION OF
PRIYANKASAHA POWERS UNDER THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE.
MAHESH MAHATO,

12 ‘SUPREME COURT AS THE HIGHEST COURT OF

SWETA RANA APPEAL, CRITICALLY ANALYSE UNDER THE CODE
ANINDITA DUTTA OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1987
NOOR NOWAZ
13 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE IS PARTLY
MIMOSHATAMANG
PROCEDURAL AND PARTLY SUBSTANTIVE IN
RUMIKAMINJ
DIPAYAN KUMR ROY NATURE WITHIN THIS REFERENCE CRITICALLY
 EXAMINE SEC 125 OF THE CODE

14 ANALYSE THE PROVISION RELATING TO

PUJA DAS MAINTENANCE OF CHILDREN AND PARENTS UNDER
RUBI SHARMA THE CODE WITH RECENT AMENDMENTS IF ANY.
JABED ISLAM
15 WITH A SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE INDIAN
EVIDENCE ACT 1872 EXAMINE THE PROVISION OF
NANDITASAHA THE CONFESSION MADE BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE
RAFATJAHAN UNDER THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE.

16 FAIR TRIAL’ AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE PROPER

RISHAV DAS, ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, CRITICALLY
SUBHAMI ROY, EVALUATE
ASHWINI CHAUHAN
17 NIRVANA LAMA CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE PLEA BARGAINING AS A
PRIYAVERMA, TREND TO INDIAN DEMOCRACY.
V. SHIKAHITOSWU

18
SABANAKHATUN
NIHARIKA GOMDEN
MAHESH MAHATO, CRITICALLY EXAMINE THE PROBATION OF
OFFENDERS ACT 1995 WITH A SPECIAL REFERENCE
TO THE DUTIES OF PROBATION OFFICER
19

PRIYANKA RAI CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE PROVISION OF BAIL

SWEETY SARKAR UNDER THE CODE WITH A SPECIAL TO
UMANGGURUNG, CANCELLATION OF BAIL

20 HELIVIZHIMOMI
NOUSEEN NIKHAT ANALYSE THE INVESTIGATION POWERS OF THE
SUPRIYATAMANG POLICE
21 ‘FAIR TRIAL’ AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE PROPER
DIKILA SHERPA ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, CRITICALLY
PRERNA GUPTA EVALUATE
RITU SHARMA
22 DIKSHA TIWARI CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE PROVISION OF BAIL
SAURAVCHHETRI UNDER THE CODE WITH A SPECIAL TO
HEENAKABIR CANCELLATION OF BAIL

23 SATARUPA GHOSH CRITICALLY EVALUATE THE TRAIL OF WARRANT

RADHABHUJEL CASES WITH LANDMARK JUDGMENTS.
SIBU BHAGAT
24 NIKITA RAI, CRITICALLY EXAMINE THE TRIAL OF SUMMONS
GAURAV CHETTRI CASES WITH ANY AMENDMENTS IF ANY
HARSH RAJ

CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE POWER OF THE

APPELLATE COURTS UNDER THE CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE CODE 1987

‘SUPREME COURT AS THE HIGHEST COURT OF

APPEAL, CRITICALLY ANALYSE UNDER THE CODE
OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1987

ANALYSE THE PROVISION RELATING TO

MAINTENANCE OF CHILDREN AND PARENTS UNDER
THE CODE WITH RECENT AMENDMENTS IF ANY.

GROUP NAME NAME OF TOPIC

NO. B.B.A LL.B. THE
STUDENTS
B.COM
1. NEHA MITTAL, NUNA HANG
SUBBA,
ANIL SUBBA
ANALYSE THE INVESTIGATION POWERS OF
THE POLICE
2 ARCHIE HINA ‘FAIR TRIAL’ AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE
AGARWAL, AGARWAL PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE,
RAYMOND CRITICALLY EVALUATE
LEPCHA,

3 ADITI CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE PROVISION OF

AGARWAL BAIL UNDER THE CODE WITH A SPECIAL TO
SWETA MITTAL CANCELLATION OF BAIL
RATIKANTA
PAL
4 ADITYA THAKUR AMARTYA ROY CRITICALLY EVALUATE THE TRAIL OF
CHOWDHURY WARRANT CASES WITH LANDMARK
ANURAG RAJ JUDGMENTS.
DEWAN
5 ADITYA SUKHLA, SUBHAM CRITICALLY EXAMINE THE TRIAL OF
THAPA SUMMONS CASES WITH ANY
SHIVANI AMENDMENTS IF ANY
AGARWAL,

6 POOJA SARAF SUBHAM CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE POWER OF THE

BANSAL, APPELLATE COURTS UNDER THE CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE CODE 1987

7 UJJWAL OINDRILA ROY ‘SUPREME COURT AS THE HIGHEST COURT

KATIWARA, MUHURI, OF APPEAL, CRITICALLY ANALYSE UNDER
NEHA SUMAN THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE
1987

8. DIPJYOTI BIRENDRA ANALYSE THE PROVISION RELATING TO

HAZARIKA, CHETTRI MAINTENANCE OF CHILDREN AND
PARENTS UNDER THE CODE WITH RECENT
AMENDMENTS IF ANY.

9 HARIOM KUMAR, PRITHA BAIL AS A MATTER OF RIGHT CRITICALLY

SARKAR EVALUATE
NIKITA KUNDU.

10 AKSHAY MISHRA, KAMALESH ANALYSE THE DIFFERENT FUNCTIONARIES

DAS UNDER THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE
SIMRAN GARG WITH A SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE
POWERS OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTORS

11 NIMA TANDIN NANCY CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE OBJECT OF

GURUNG, JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT 2000 AND ITS
PROVISIONS WITH A CRITICAL
EXAMINATION OF PRATAP SINGH V. STATE
OF JHARKHAND, 20005 (2) SC 271
12 BARSHA ‘THE PRODUCE OF ARREST MUST BE FAIR
TAMANG, AND JUST KEEPING IN MIND THE
PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE’.
RAJAT BALMIKI ELUCIDATE
13 PRITAM MUHURI, ANALYSE THE PRINCIPLE OF ‘INNOCENT
ATIF NASIM TILL PROVEN GUILTY’ WITH REFERENCE
JILLAN TO THE PROVISIONS CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE CODE AS ONE OF THE MOST
IMPORTANT PRINCIPLE OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE.
14 SASWATA DEEPSAGAR ANALYSE THE POWERS OF THE POLICE
CHATTERJEE DUTRAJ, UNDER THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
SACHI DANIKA

15 DERSHIKA SOURAV DAS ‘F.I.R AS THE 1ST WHEEL OF THE CRIMINAL

SHARMA ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE’ CRITICALLY
MANU MISHRA, ANALYSE.

16 AMRIT CHETTRI TASHI TOBJEN ANALYSE WITH LANDMARK JUDGMENTS

SAYEDA RIZMI DORJI THE POWER OF REFERENCE AND REVISION
UNDER THE CODE.

17 SUDHARSAN RAI APARAJITA CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE PLEA

YENTEN PRIYADARSHA BARGAINING AS A TREND TO INDIAN
JAMSTHO, NI DEMOCRACY.

18 SANGELA RISHAV WITH THE REFERENCE OF THE LANDMARK

THOCKAR AGARWAL, JUDGMENT IN PAWAN KUMAR PANDEY V.
TAMANG STATE OF U.P 1997 CRI LJ 2686 (ALL)
DPANWITA CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE PROVISION OF
SINHA, BAIL UNDER THE CODE.