Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Lauren Yang
Ms. Jorgensen
English 10 H P1
21 February 2019
In the article “Let Girls Learn,” Michelle Obama, former First Lady, claims that to fully
address the global crisis of girls’ education, it is critical to not only make significant investments,
but to more importantly, challenge cultural beliefs and practices. Moreover, she attests to the
fact that allowing girls a full education can spur the development of the country as a whole.
The primary claim is advanced through Obama’s outline of the initiatives taken to open
new opportunities for young girls and suppress the issues that prevent them from staying in
school. She addresses a common claim that, “We can solve this problem, the argument goes, if
we provide more scholarships for girls...uniforms, and supplies” (Obama 1). She then comments
that these advancements are, in effect, surface-level, and are not sufficient to solve the problem,
making the assertion that these shifts are not effective until society is restructured to empower
and accept girls rather than disgrace and oppress them. The shame surrounding menstruation and
survivors of sexual assault, along with disapproval of women in the workforce, are a number of
stigmas to be lifted. Following this claim is the inclusion of historical acts of women's rights
activism in the United States, to present the plausibility of such a change. Obama is able to
assert her authority on the subject by referencing her own efforts in solving the issue, including
that, “...I’ll also be speaking at a global education conference in Qatar where I’ll be urging
countries around the world to make new investments in girls’ education and challenge laws and
practices…” (Obama 1), in addition to her involvement in the launch of the initiative Let Girls
Yang 2
Learn. She also uses logic to explain the strides towards development that can result from
educating girls. By including statistics that show a decrease in infant and maternal mortality rate,
as well as increase in salary Obama indicates that resolving this issue can positively affect the
country as a whole. Obama’s use of emotional appeals is apparent in her description of the
underprivileged girls she has encountered, and what potential may be lost through lack of
opportunity. She also evokes empathy by asking, “None of us here in the U.S. would accept this
for our own daughters and granddaughters, so why would we accept it for any girl on our
planet?” (Obama 2), which puts into perspective the depth of the issue. This argument is
credible because it uses references of relevant information to logically support the claims, and it
is evident that Obama had a purpose to bring attention to a continuously under addressed
worldwide crisis. Although the central claim is not reinforced throughout the writing, it is
developed and elaborated upon to add depth to the argument. Obama’s writing clearly conveys
anecdotal evidence with emotional appeals. Lastly, she lends to her credibility with explanation
of her personal experience with underprivileged girls and what she had done, and will continue
Works Cited