Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PREWRITING STRATEGY
Emily Hay
Manhattan College
Running head: PREPPING IN THE WRITING PROCESS: MIND MAPPING AS AN EFFECTIVE 2
PREWRITING STRATEGY
Abstract
This paper examines the improvements made in the writing skills of one student after
they used mind maps as a prewriting strategy. This project was conducted during an afterschool
tutoring program at Manhattan College. The student was tutored on an induvial basis, in which
most tutoring sessions were allocated for instructional aid in the ELA content area. The student
lacks self-regulated preparation before writing and this consequentially effects his ability to
consistently write with coherence and clarity. The objective of this action research paper is to
ascertain the effectiveness of mind mapping as a prewriting strategy in enhancing the writing
abilities of a single student. For this project, the student was instructed in how to use the mind
map strategy before writing short responses. After a week of guided practice, the student created
mind maps independently for the following four weeks. The student used these mind maps to
organize ideas during the brainstorming process before completing short responses.
Significantly, mind mapping proved beneficial to the quality of the student’s written responses.
Introduction/Research Question
As students advance in their learning careers, they are tasked with completing writing
assignments at increased rigor and length. Academic writing is an involved process, a process
that requires students to develop effective and coherent writing skills as tool for academic
success. During my experience in early adolescent ELA classrooms, I found students are
disengaged and, at times, overwhelmed by writing research and argumentative essays. Students
tend to focus on including the mandated essay components. This means that students are
primarily concerned with the final written product and not the writing process. After observing
this, I decided to research the effects that prewriting strategies have on improving writing skills.
skill. Over the course of this semester I have been tutoring a thirteen-year-old boy, Max, in
reading and writing, and I began to see a consistent inhibition which effected Max’s writing
abilities. Max would avoid planning, outlining, or organizing his thoughts before any writing
task. Max also struggles with retaining information and generally forgets the purpose of the
writing assignment as he undergoes the writing process. When students don’t engage with
prewriting techniques, they lose out on a critical opportunity to comprehend what they are
writing about before they begin writing. The prewriting strategy called mind mapping allows
students to visually display multiple connections made when thinking about a topic. Students
start with a main idea and establish associations by branching out lines to other related ideas.
Mind mapping offers a metacognitive process where students can think about what ideas they are
connecting, along with the possible patterns and meanings that might exist as well. The mind
mapping strategy could help students with organizing initial thoughts, generating new ideas, and
Running head: PREPPING IN THE WRITING PROCESS: MIND MAPPING AS AN EFFECTIVE 4
PREWRITING STRATEGY
instill a sense of confidence in brainstorming and planning before completing a writing task. By
supporting students through instruction in the prewriting phase, teachers can prepare students for
Literature Review
Beena Vijayavasalan (2016) discusses what resulted, in terms of essay writing skills,
from the utilization of the mind mapping strategy with undergraduate students at Abu Dhabi
University. He was concerned with the quality of essay writing in higher education, and
specifically how brainstorming strategies can offer a platform for student’s to more efficiently
begin the writing process. The study set out to ascertain the outcome of mind maps in essay
writing and “if and how mind maps enhance the ability to write well-meaning essays” (139).
groups of students introduced to the mind mapping prewriting strategy demonstrated higher
quality writing in comparison to groups of students who did not create mind maps as a prewriting
strategy to brainstorm. The quality of students’ writing was judged on their ability to produce
“logical and coherent essays” (148). The results indicated to me that it would be beneficial, even
if only yielding minimal improvement, to introduce Max to the mind mapping strategy.
Al-Zyoud, Al Jamal, and Baniabdelrahman (2017) inspected the possible influence that
the mind map strategy has on student’s writing performance when implemented before several
writing tasks. They proposed that the use of the mind mapping strategy would support students
as they develop their thinking and organize their thoughts by creating the graphic organizer
before writing. The researchers studied 40 male students in the eleventh grade who attended Al
Hashymia School, an all-boy school in Zarqa, and relied on qualitative data to determine if there
Running head: PREPPING IN THE WRITING PROCESS: MIND MAPPING AS AN EFFECTIVE 5
PREWRITING STRATEGY
was any “statistically significant differences” contingent on usage of the mind mapping strategy.
For the study, students were separated into two groups, an experimental group of 20 students and
a control group with 20 students. Students in the experimental group were taught the mind
mapping strategy, and then completed writing performance activities (paragraph and essay
writing) by using the mind mapping strategy to brainstorm and plan during the pre-writing phase.
The control group wrote about similar topics in their essays and paragraphs but were instructed
under the “conventional method” (284). The researchers conducted a timed pre-test and post-test
to analyze the performance differences. The results of the study show that students in the
experimental group could deepen their engagement with the writing process by organizing their
ideas, activating their prior knowledge on the essay topic, and making visual connection, which
ultimately developed their writing performance. Like these students, Max doesn’t spend time
organizing his ideas. This study demonstrated to me how the mind map strategy would provide a
Todd H. Sundeen (2012) examined the effects of using mind mapping, under direct
instruction, as an organizational tool for students during the prewriting phase. The goal of the
research was to form a better understanding of the impact that directly teaching prewriting
strategies has on improving the overall quality of written works produced by secondary students
with learning disabilities. Sundeen conducted action research and studied the corresponding
effects of introducing and teaching the mind mapping strategy at staggering intervals to three
was collected during a pre-test, before the intervention phase, and again after the completion of
the post-intervention phase. Sundeen relied on an analysis of students’ daily writing scores and
interviews with teachers and students in order to gauge how students’ writing quality improved.
Running head: PREPPING IN THE WRITING PROCESS: MIND MAPPING AS AN EFFECTIVE 6
PREWRITING STRATEGY
Overall, results indicate that providing direct instruction for the mind mapping strategy “may
benefit students with learning disabilities” and support their performance throughout the writing
process (30). After reviewing this study, it became clear that my one-on-one tutoring sessions
with Max would lend themselves to the process of direction instruction. I would be able to
explicitly show Max the mind map strategy and observe his independent performance.
Method
Project Goals and Objectives
The primary objective for this action research project was for Max to independently
create mind maps to improve his writing performance. Max and I met once a week for forty-five
minutes. During this time, I assessed Max’s writing performance by implementing the mind
mapping strategy before assigning writing tasks for him to complete. The tasks included writing
Procedure
For this project, I allocated five tutoring sessions with Max to conduct observations.
There was one tutoring session that Max did not attend, and one additional tutoring session was
used to interview Max. On the first day of tutoring, I assessed Max’s writing abilities by
collecting a few samples such as DoNow’s and Exit Slips which Max had written in class. Max
had initially been brought to the tutoring program after consistently struggling with reading and
writing in his ELA courses. Max was currently working on a book report for his eight grade
Literature class. On the first day of the tutoring, I asked Max to talk about the book he was
reading, which was the Diary of a Wimpy Kid. For a few minutes, Max discussed what he liked
about the book and why. After, I asked Max to write a description of what the book was about.
Running head: PREPPING IN THE WRITING PROCESS: MIND MAPPING AS AN EFFECTIVE 7
PREWRITING STRATEGY
Next, Max and I reviewed the prewriting strategy mind mapping. I explained to Max that
the mind mapping technique would help him organize his thoughts and plan his ideas before
beginning to write. For four tutoring sessions, Max would use the mind mapping strategy to
brainstorm and then write a paragraph based on the assigned prompt. Prompts were open ended
and included tasks like writing a review of a book and describing what Manhattan College
represents. During the sixth tutoring session, I collected several of the mind maps and writing
responses. Additionally, I conducted a brief interview with Max to discern how he felt about
Results
Over the period of five tutoring sessions, Max completed four mind maps and five
written responses. Throughout the proceeding tutoring sessions, Max’s mind maps exhibited an
overall improvement. A clear and comparative difference can be discerned in Figure 1 and
Figure 2. The mind map in Figure 1, which Max completed in week 1 of observations, contains
less interconnected branches than the mind map in figure 2. By week 3, as shown in Figure 2,
Max completed the mind map in a more comprehensive fashion. The mind map in Figure 2
demonstrates a more substantial product and therefore indicates Max’s brainstorming process.
Although the mind map in Figure 2 contains less visual icons/graphics than the mind map
featured in Figure 1, the amount of details in the content and connections between ideas
improved. Furthermore, the ideas that Max generated were notably more complex. In Figure 2,
this is observable in the interconnection Max branched in-between more general ideas. An
example of this appears when Max writes that “it never happened,” which branches off from the
word “fiction.”
Running head: PREPPING IN THE WRITING PROCESS: MIND MAPPING AS AN EFFECTIVE 8
PREWRITING STRATEGY
Figure 1. Figure 2.
Running head: PREPPING IN THE WRITING PROCESS: MIND MAPPING AS AN EFFECTIVE 9
PREWRITING STRATEGY
The increased frequency of mind map usage correlated to an increase in the quality and
coherence of Max’s writing performance. Max’s third writing task, featured in Figure 3,
demonstrates a stronger level of organization and cohesion than what was initially observed in
the quality of his writing. Specifically, Max utilized ideas directly from his mind map when
formulate relevance and unity between the ideas discussed in his writing. The writing sample
featured in Figure 3 is efficiently detailed and evince the improvement made in Max’s writing
performance. Max acknowledged in the subsequent interview the he felt more confident to begin
writing after he had organized his ideas beforehand. When asked about how he thought the mind
mapping strategy helped his writing skills, Max indicated that having the mind map to refer to
Running head: PREPPING IN THE WRITING PROCESS: MIND MAPPING AS AN EFFECTIVE 10
PREWRITING STRATEGY
helped him remember what he was writing about. The graphic organizer appears to provide
Limitations
This study contains limitations that should be discerned prior to examining the procedure
and concluding results. Firstly, the research was conducted during several tutoring sessions
outside of school, which allowed for a controlled setting. Secondly, there was only one
participant, Max, which provides limited, if not minimal, results for analysis. Additionally, Max
sometimes misplaced his writing assignments and mind maps, rendering an obstruction to results
and loss of significant data. Finally, Max was asked to develop written paragraphs, which does
not lend itself to an analysis of how Max would perform when completing larger performance
Conclusion
The mind mapping strategy proved beneficial to Max’s writing performance. By the fifth
tutoring session, Max was constructing meaningful sentences with a lot more ease. Overall, Max
was successful in organizing his ideas with the mind map. This prewriting strategy proved to be
helpful in helping Max clearly communicate his ideas into written expression. Although Max
began adding more details and making more connections when creating mind maps, he struggled
with creating visual images to align with or reflect his ideas. As a graphic organizer, mind maps
combine graphics with words, and this helps transport the ideas in students heads onto paper. If
the study were too have continued, I would have introduced Max to an online computer
application that generates mind maps. In a subsequent action research project, I would collect
more writing samples to have more data for comparison. Additionally, I would have Max use the
Running head: PREPPING IN THE WRITING PROCESS: MIND MAPPING AS AN EFFECTIVE 11
PREWRITING STRATEGY
online mind map application to facilitate the creation of graphics along with the words he
brainstorms.
Running head: PREPPING IN THE WRITING PROCESS: MIND MAPPING AS AN EFFECTIVE 12
PREWRITING STRATEGY
References
Al-Zyoud, A., Al Jamal, D., & Baniabdelrahman, A. (2017). Mind Mapping and Students' Writing
Sundeen, T. H. (2012). Explicit Prewriting Instruction: Effect on Writing Quality of Adolescents with
Vijayavalsalan, E. (2016). Mind Mapping as a Strategy for Enhancing Essay Writing Skills. The New