Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
HOME ABOUT US SERVICES CUSTOMERS IMPACT BLOG CONTACT US
Home / Cost Saving / 5 Mini Case Studies: Successful Supply Chain Cost Reduction and Management
YES! Please send me your
5 Mini Case Studies: Successful Supply Chain Cost fortnightly email Bulletin
full of Tips and Insights.
3
Reduction and Management
Email Address
Sep 27, 2018 | Cost Saving | 8 comments
1
SUBSCRIBE
62
Recent Posts
7 Reasons Why the Supply Chain
Matters to Business Success
If you were to tell me that your company had never looked at its supply chain costs and sought to deliver Categories
reductions, I would be mightily surprised. On the other hand, if you told me your company hasn’t been 3PL
able to sustain any progress in supply chain cost reduction, I wouldn’t be surprised at all.
Articles
Most companies start out with the best intentions to achieve successful and sustainable supply chain cost Audio Interviews
management, but somehow seem to lose momentum, only to see costs increase again in fairly short
Benchmarking
order.
Books
The following ve mini case studies explore a few high-pro le companies that have managed to sustain
Business Improvement
their supply chain cost reduction e orts and keep expenses under control. The challenges faced by these
organisations and the steps they took, may provide some inspiration for successful long-term cost Case Studies
management within your own organisation. Chain of Responsibility
Change Management
Charity Work
1. Deere & Company
Consultants
Corporate Social Responsibility
Cost Saving
Cost to Serve
CRM
Customer Service
Global Sourcing
Supply Chain Cost Reduction Challenges: Deere and company has a complex product range, which
includes a mix of heavy machinery for the consumer market and industrial equipment, which is made to Glossaries
order. Retail activity is extremely seasonal, with the majority of sales made between March and July. Hiring
Info Graphics
Inventory – S&OP
Logistics
Materials Handling
News
O shoring
Opinion
Outsourcing
People
The Path to Cost Reduction: The company undertook a supply chain network redesign program, Slotting
resulting in the commissioning of intermediate “merge centers” and optimization of cross-dock terminal Supply Chain
locations.
Supply Chain Leaders Academy
Deere & Company also began consolidating shipments and using break-bulk terminals during the seasonal Supply Chain Strategy
peak. The company also increased its use of third-party logistics providers and e ectively created a
Sustainability – Environment
network that could be tactically optimized at any given point in time.
Technology
Supply Chain Cost Management Results: Deere & Company’s supply chain cost management
Testimonial
achievements included inventory reduction of $1 billion, a signi cant reduction in customer delivery lead
times (from ten days to ve or less) and annual transportation cost savings of around 5%. Training & Education
Transport
Trends
2. Intel Vacancies
Videos
Warehouse
Webinars
Search
One of the world’s largest manufacturers of computer chips, Intel needs little introduction. However, the
company needed to make some signi cant supply chain cost reductions after bringing its low-cost “Atom”
chip to market. Supply chain costs of around $5.50 per chip were bearable for units selling for $100, but
the price of the new chip was a fraction of that, at about $20.
The Supply Chain Cost Reduction Challenge: Somehow Intel had to reduce the supply chain costs for
the Atom chip, but had only one area of leverage—inventory.
The chip had to work, so there were no service trade-o s that could be made. Being a single component,
there was also no way to pay less in the way of duties. Intel had already whittled packaging down to a
minimum and with a high value-to-weight ratio, the chips’ distribution costs could not really be pared
down any further.
The only option was to try to reduce levels of inventory, which, up to that point, had been kept very high in
order to support a nine-week order cycle. The only way Intel could nd to make supply chain cost
reductions was to bring this cycle time down and therefore reduce inventory.
The Path to Cost Reduction: Intel decided to try what was considered an unlikely supply chain strategy
for the semiconductor industry: a true make-to-order scenario. The company began with a pilot operation
using a manufacturer in Malaysia. Through a process of iteration, they gradually sought out and
eliminated supply chain ine ciencies to incrementally reduce order cycle time. Further improvement
initiatives included:
Reduced the chip assembly test window from a ve-day schedule, to a bi-weekly, 2-day-long process
Introduced a formal S&OP planning process
Moved to a vendor-managed inventory model wherever it was possible to do so
Supply Chain Cost Management Results: Through its incremental approach to cycle time improvement,
Intel eventually drove the order cycle time for the Atom chip down from nine weeks to just two. As a result,
the company achieved a supply chain cost reduction of more than $4 per unit for the $20 Atom chip—a far
more palatable rate than the original gure of $5.50.
3. Starbucks
Like Intel, Starbucks is pretty much a household name. But like many of the most successful worldwide
brands, the co ee shop giant has been through its periods of supply chain pain. In fact, during 2007 and
2008, Starbucks leadership began to have serious doubts about the company’s ability to supply its 16,700
outlets. As in most commercial sectors at that time, sales were falling. At the same time though, supply
chain costs rose by more than $75 million.
Supply Chain Cost Reduction Challenges: When the supply chain executive team began investigating the
rising costs and supply chain performance issues, they found that service was indeed falling short of
expectations. Findings included the following problems
The Path to Cost Reduction: Starbucks’ leadership had three main objectives in mind to achieve
improved performance and supply chain cost reduction. These were to:
In order to meet these objectives, Starbucks divided all its supply chain functions into three key groups,
known as “plan” “make” and “deliver”. It also opened a new production facility, bringing the total number
of U.S. plants to four.
Next, the company set about terminating partnerships with all but its most e ective 3PLs. The remaining
partners were then managed via a weekly scorecard system, which was aligned with renewed service level
agreements.
Supply Chain Cost Management Results: By the time Starbucks’ supply chain transformation program
was completed, the company had made savings of more than $500 million over the course of 2009 and
2010, of which a large proportion came out of the supply chain, according to Peter Gibbons, then
Executive Vice President of Global Supply Chain Operations.
4. AGCO
Like Deere & Company, AGCO is a leading global force in the manufacture and supply of agricultural
machinery. The company grew substantially over the course of two decades, with a considerable
proportion of that growth achieved by way of acquisitions.
As commonly happens when enterprises grow in this way, AGCO experienced increasing degrees of supply
chain complexity, along with associated increases in cost, but for many years, did little to address the issue
directly, largely due to the decentralized and fragmented nature of its global network.
In 2012, AGCO’s leaders recognised that this state of a airs could not continue and decided to establish a
long-term program of strategic optimisation.
Supply Chain Cost Reduction Challenges: With ve separate brands under its umbrella, AGCO’s product
portfolio is vast. At the point when optimisation planning began, sourcing and inbound logistics were
managed by teams in various countries, each with di erent levels of SCM maturity, and using di erent
tools and systems.
As a result of the decentralised environment, in which inbound logistics and transport management were
separate operational elds, there was insu cient transparency in the supply chain. Synergies and
economies of scale (and the bene ts of the same) were not being taken advantage of, and all these issues
were set against a backdrop of a volatile, seasonal market.
The Path to Cost Reduction: Following a SCOR supply chain benchmarking exercise, AGCO decided to
approach its cost reduction and e ciency goals by blending
new technology—in the form of a globally integrated
transport management system (TMS)—with a commitment to
form a partnership with a suitably capable 3PL provider.
With the technology and partnership in place, a logistics control tower was developed, which integrates
and coordinates all daily inbound supply activities within Europe, from the negotiation of carrier freight
rates, through inbound shipment scheduling and transport plan optimisation to self-billing for carrier
payment.
Supply Chain Cost Management Results: Within a year and a half of their European logistics solution’s
go-live, AGCO achieved freight cost reductions of some 18%, and has continued to save between three and
ve percent on freight expenditure, year-on-year, ever since. Having since rolled the new operating model
out in China and North America, the company has reduced inbound logistics costs by 28%, increased
network performance by 25% and cut inventory levels by a quarter.
5. Terex
Headquartered in Westport Connecticut, Terex Corporation may not be such a well-known name, but if
your company has ever rented an aerial working platform (a scissor-lift or similar), there is a good chance
it was manufactured by Terex and originally dispatched to the rental company from a transfer center in
North Bend, Washington.
The North Bend facility is always lled with lifting equipment, most pieces made to order and uniquely
customised for speci c customers. Terex maintained a manual system for yard management at the
transfer centre, which generated excessive costs for what should have been a relatively simple process of
locating customers’ units to prep them for delivery.
The Supply Chain Cost Reduction Challenge: A wallboard and sticker system was a low-tech solution for
identifying equipment items in the yard at Terex. While inexpensive in itself, the solution cost around six
minutes every time an employee had to locate a unit in the yard. It also required a considerable number of
hours to be spent each month taking physical inventories and updating the company’s ERP platform.
The Path to Cost Reduction: Terex decided to replace the outdated manual yard management process
with a new, digital solution using RFID tracking. A yard management software (YMS) product was chosen,
and the transfer centre was surveyed before implementation of a pilot project covering a small portion of
the yard.
After a successful pilot, the solution was approved for full-scale implementation, replacing stickers, yard
maps, and wallboard with electronic tracking and digital inventory management. As at December of 2017,
Terex was making plans to integrate the yard management solution with its ERP platform to enable even
greater functionality.
Supply Chain Cost Management Results: While the YMS cannot reconcile inventory automatically with
the Terex ERP application, it does at least provide a daily inventory count via its business intelligence
module. That alone has saved the labour costs previously incurred in carrying out manual counts.
More importantly though, the RFID-based unit identi cation and location process has saved the company
around 70 weeks per year in labour costs, by cutting the process time down from six minutes, to a mere
30 seconds per unit.
At the same time, none of the changes took place overnight. In fact, each of the companies tackled issues
in phases, e ectively learning more as they went along.
Seldom will major savings be made by whittling away piecemeal at what seem on the face of it, to be the
most pressing issues of the day (such as direct transportation costs or supplier pricing). If you want to see
sustainable cost reductions, your company will need to view the big picture from a new angle or two, and
be prepared to step outside of the comfort zone to which it will have become accustomed.
Editor’s Note: This post was originally published in June 2016 under the title “3 Mini Case Studies: Successful
Supply Chain Cost Reduction and Management”. It has since been revamped to include two new case studies, so
that there are now ve mini case studies in total.
Best Regards,
Rob O’Byrne
Email: robyrne@logisticsbureau.com
Phone: +61 417 417 307
Related Posts
Cost to Serve – 10% of your Orders Might be Making a Loss
Do You Know When it’s Time for a Freight Review?
Supply Chain Cost Reduction: The Dangers of Supplier Squeezing
Reverse Logistics Management for Supply Chain Cost Reductions
Package Your Way to Supply Chain Cost Reductions
Cost Reduction in Supply Chains by Opportunity and by Design
3 Guiding Principles for Sustained Working Capital Reduction
How to Target Cycle Times for Working Capital Reduction
3 Things to Stop Doing If You Want To Reduce Working Capital
Reducing Working Capital in Supply Chains
8 Comments
Norberto Pruskowski on June 8, 2018 at 6:10 am
Reply
Me too.
Submit a Comment
Your email address will not be published. Required elds are marked *
Comment
Name *
Email *
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.
Submit Comment
Home
Events
Services
Supply Chain Consultants
Logistics Bureau Group
Benchmarking Success
News Supply Chain Strategy Dawson Consulting
Frequently Asked Questions Warehouse Layout Supply Chain Forum Email Address
Copyright © 2019 Logistics Bureau Pty Ltd. SEO by Online Marketing Whiz