Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Additionally, there must be some geological process active to create the pressurisation itself.
The mechanisms below are some suggestions for development of abnormal pressure regimes
within a sedimentary sequence. The list is not intended to be complete; rather it should serve
as an indication of the wide variety of ways in which formation pore pressure can be
affected.
The duration over which the overpressuring can be maintained will depend on several
factors, notably the quality of the seal and the continuation of the geological process.
Two schools of thought currently exist that endeavour to explain the presence of
overpressuring even in very old sequences. These are the static and dynamic approaches.
The former relies on the seal remaining effective over long time periods and thus continuing
to trap overpressured fluids even after the initial pressuring mechanism has ceased.
The latter view is that few seals are effective beyond a few million years duration, and that
the strength of overpressuring in any area reflects an ongoing pressurisation process.
In young sedimentary sequences such as the Tertiary of the North Sea and the offshore Gulf
of Mexico area, both models are reasonable. However, recent studies suggest that the
permeability of sediments in older basins is insufficient to prevent fluid escape over periods
in excess of 100,000,000 years.
Lee and Deming (2002) made a study of the Palaeozoic Anadarko Basin in the USA to test
the two theories as a means of explaining the strong overpressuring seen within the basin.
They looked at compaction disequilibrium (section 2.3.2) and hydrocarbon generation
(section 2.4.3) as two possible geological processes capable of causing the overpressures
seen, then evaluated average basin permeability to check if the required effectiveness of seal
could be found.
2-1
With hydrocarbon generation, temperature as well as permeability had to be considered.
Assuming temperature gradient, deposition, and erosion factors, they concluded that
overpressuring at current levels was feasible with seal permeability in the range 10-6 to
10-8mD. This model also places the gas source rocks within the basin at the correct depth for
hydrocarbon generation.
Unfortunately Lee and Deming admit that they cannot be absolutely conclusive in their
studies as they assume homogeneity within the sedimentary layers that is unlikely to be real.
They use average basin permeability values rather than localised low permeability layers. The
important conclusion to be drawn from this work is that there is unlikely to be a single over-
riding source of both overpressuring and trapping of that pressure.
The material that follows in this section is a collection of short notes illustrating a variety of
different abnormal pressure sources.
Pore pressures derived from porosity responses (including seismic velocity) can be
markedly different depending on which of these categories applies to the rocks under study.
This has serious implications when considering the use of compaction trends (Section 3.3),
especially with older deformed rocks. This is discussed in detail by Lee (2003).
Porosity
Loading
Unloading
0 Effective Stress
Figure 2-1: Shale Porosity Response to Loading and Unloading
2-2
Seismic Velocity
Unloading
Loading
0 Effective Stress
Figure 2-2: Shale Seismic Velocity Response to Loading and Unloading
The Central North Sea contains highly overpressured Tertiary shale sequences of this type,
which have been deposited with thicknesses of around 3350 m over 60 m years. The
dominant formation in this basin is soft grey clay, often referred to as gumbo. Due to the
combination of rapid sedimentation and low permeability, the pore fluid in this clay has not
yet escaped. Maximum pressures observed in the Oligocene often correspond to formations
laid down under higher deposition rates. Given sufficient time it is probable that compaction
will continue and that the fluid will eventually be squeezed out producing a normally
compacted sequence.
2-3
Carstens (1978) and others have noted that thin (2-3 m) limestone bands can act as seals
preventing fluid expulsion from these Tertiary clays. In addition, the clays also display
abnormally high porosity due to fluid retention resulting in lowered densities, low sonic
velocities, and low electrical resistivities. These limestone cap rocks may act as perfect seals.
The greatest difference between shales and clays located beneath such a perfect seal and
those that are rapidly deposited (and hence have an imperfect seal) is the rate of increase in
pressure observed upon drilling into them. The imperfectly sealed formation is characterised
by a gradual build-up of pressure (several metres to hundreds of metres thick) called a
pressure transition zone, while the perfectly sealed formations display a rapid pressure
build-up as soon as the zone is penetrated.
Limestones capping the Kimmeridge Clay are common in the North Sea, and may often
conceal rapid pressure changes.
Uplift
Formations originally at a depth where they are normally pressured may be uplifted to a
shallower depth. The formation in question could be located within the limb of a fold, or
within the up-thrown block of a large thrust fault.
2-4
The geological process that uplifts a buried formation also tends to lift the overburden. It
follows that uplift can only generate abnormal pressure gradients when accompanied by
another geological process, such as erosion, which reduces the relief between the buried rock
and the surface. The magnitude of pressure is therefore a function of the initial depth of burial
and the degree of uplift.
Faulting
In the event of subsurface movement creating severe faulting, deeper fluid pressures may
escape to shallower formations, as discussed in section 2.3.6 below. This may also occur
between two formations located at much greater depths. As in charged sands, abnormal
pressures will persist provided the seal is of suitable quality.
Major faults contribute to the creation of abnormal pressures by re-distributing sediments and
placing permeable zones opposite impermeable zones, thus forming seals. Fault planes
themselves may prevent the expulsion of water during the compaction process such that clays
may retain abnormally high porosity.
Fracture zones may also allow the transmission of high formation pressures upwards to a
shallower horizon where they represent abnormally high pressure. This phenomenon has been
observed in locations that have experienced significant thrust faulting, such as in the Andes
of Colombia. Here, the behaviour of the rocks being drilled at relatively shallow depth was
entirely consistent with a state of good overbalance. However, with no obvious formation
change observed through analysis of cuttings and drilling data, significant connection gasses
began to appear. The only explanation for this apparent contradiction was that a much deeper
zone was leaking fluid through a fault or fracture plane to the wellbore of the current well.
The deeper formation was at an overpressure relative to the current well depth, with
consequent development of close to balance indications from the gas behaviour.
In a normally pressured system there exists sufficient permeability both laterally and
vertically to allow the pore fluids to be freely expelled in response to compaction stresses. As
2-5
a consequence of this permeability the pressure state of the fluid becomes independent of the
pressure state of the matrix. Fluid pressure gradient is therefore constant (provided fluid
density is constant) throughout the sequence.
Where seals develop, the pore pressure gradient in a permeable rock will be dependent on
the fluid density, but the actual value of pressure will also be shifted above the hydrostatic
pressure gradient defining normal pressure. The size of the overpressure shift is largely
controlled by the pressure trapped in the surrounding clays. This effect is seen whenever
MDT-type pressure results are analysed (figure 2-5).
Overpressuring
Even in overpressured systems, the sands and shales should remain in pressure equilibrium
if the dip is horizontal and fluid type is consistent, i.e. the pressure at the base of the shale
overlying the sand is consistent with the pressure at top sand (figure 2-6). The rate at which
pressure alters through the sand and shale will be permeability controlled, however.
2-6
Pressure
TVD
In the sand layers, the pressure gradient continues to be influenced by fluid density
superimposed on the basic shale-derived pore pressure value. In clays and shales, the
pressure gradient in overpressured systems is generally higher than the fluid density-based
gradient within the sands. This rate can approach the overburden gradient in extreme cases.
Overpressuring in younger relatively undeformed clays like the North Sea Tertiary is
predominantly caused by undercompaction (section 2.3.2).
This means that when drilling into a sand body enclosed within shale or clay, overpressures
greater than those encountered within the clays at the depth where the sand is penetrated may
be seen due to the difference in gradients (figures 2-7 and 2-8).
The depth at which the sand and clay pressure gradients are coincident is known as the
centroid. If the characteristics of the sand (porosity and permeability) are uniform
throughout, then the centroid depth will be the mid-point depth of the sand body. Corrections
to allow for variations in permeability, etc may have to be applied on a case-by-case basis.
Traugott 1997 evaluated the pressure difference between the sand pressure and shale pressure
to increase by around 3.45 bars per 30 m of height above the centroid depth in his area of
investigation. This means that the clay derived pore pressures encountered as drilling
proceeds through the cap rock should have 3.45 bars per 30 m of structure (estimated from
seismic prognosis information) added when considering the pressures within the reservoir at
the depth where the reservoir will be penetrated.
2-7
Pressure (bars)
Hydrostatic pressure
Overburden
Hydrostatic
Clay pressure
Sand pressure
Fracture Pressure
Centroid
2-8
Evaluation of this effect from seismic velocity and offset well data requires analysis of the
structure from lowest to highest point to obtain the maximum height. Facies analysis is then
required to separate permeable and non-permeable rocks. The centroid effect is greatest in
the thickest reservoir type rocks.
The predominant pressure regime in the basin is then estimated (for example from
compaction analysis) to obtain the pressures in the clays surrounding the reservoirs.
Note that the presence of hydrocarbons will affect the pressure gradients within the sand
due to buoyancy effects. This is discussed in section 2.4.3. The gas and oil effects are
superimposed onto the centroid effects for water as discussed above.
Matthews & Standifird 2003 summarise the effects controlling the sand/shale pressure
relationship as follows:
Since precise data for the above factors are not likely to be available to the well planner,
realistic ranges in the values of these factors should be input when creating the well model.
Planning of drilling fluid and casing programmes therefore should be flexible enough to
allow for variations within these parameter ranges to be catered for.
The centroid concept is only usefully applied in prospects with significant structural relief, as
seen from seismic data. Although the pressure differential at the top of the structure between
clay and sand will occur in any height, the effect on the drilling fluid density required to drill
into the sand is minimal in small relief structures.
Difficulties with the centroid principle, with possible consequences of misinterpretation have
been identified by some authors, e.g. Shaker (c.2005). Here the centroid principle is shown to
fail if there is communication between two or more sand beds separated by apparently sealing
clays
2-9
2.3.4 Salt Diapirism
The greatest risk in drilling through salts occurs where large permeable rock bodies (e.g.
dolomite as found in Southern North Sea) are enclosed within the salt diapir. The dolomite
may initially be situated below the salt horizon before deformation occurs. The application of
strong compressive tectonic forces causes the brittle dolomite to fold and ultimately fracture.
However the salt behaves plastically in response to these stresses, and flows around the
fracture-generated dolomite fragments. The process continues as the salt exploits a point of
weakness above and bursts through the overlying strata to form the diapir. The dolomite
laths are often transported upwards within the salt. The salt acts as a perfect seal as it is
impossible to induce fracture permeability, and the salt matrix itself has zero porosity. Thus
any fluid pressure contained within the dolomite is preserved as the salt travels upwards
towards the surface. At its final depth, the dolomite is now likely to display a seriously
overpressured fluid gradient.
The hazard associated with this situation is the inability to see the dolomite within the salt. If
a drilling plan is formulated that requires the diapir to be penetrated, it is most likely that the
drilling fluid density in use will be based on the expected pressures in the sediments
overlying and underlying the salt. Typically drilling fluid density may be 1.50 SG, but the
dolomite may require in excess of 2.30 SG to control its pressure. The release of such high
pressures into the wellbore may result in fracture of the rocks overlying the salt. If the
dolomite contains hydrocarbon or H2S then the risks are increased significantly should the
released fluids reach the surface (blowout).
2-10
The stresses causing the clay movement are tectonic, with global mud volcano distribution
associated with subduction and orogenic belts.
The danger of mud volcanoes is greatest where the area of ground or seabed on which a
platform may stand is disturbed.
Piparo 1995
Figure 2-10: Mud Volcanoes
(from Geological Society of Trinidad & Tobago (www.gstt.org)
Hydrocarbon gases and liquids are commonly ejected as well as water. The Palo Seco
volcano in figure 2-10 displays an oil sheen ring, with methane gas bubbles emerging
approximately every ten seconds.
Slow gentle eruptions are probably due to the action of overburden pressure on highly
undercompacted, plastic clay layers that take advantage of any fracture or other weakness
in the overlying sediment layers to reach the surface. Below the surface these bodies form
mud diapirs.
More violent eruptions are more likely to be due to the explosive release of methane gas,
perhaps generated within the plastic clay itself, that has reached a critical pressure that allows
the clay to push through the overlying beds.
2-11
A major mud volcano eruption following a blowout occurred in 2006 in Java, Indonesia
(figure 2-11). The volcano has been named Lusi, and by May 2008 had extruded enough
material to cover an area of 7km2, destroying a complete town and rendering 30000 people
homeless. Scientific opinion considers that the activation of the volcano was due to a nearby
exploration well penetrating and releasing a layer of high pressure, high temperature water
(Durham University 2008). The redistribution of stresses then caused the major movement of
mud to the surface.
This condition can also result from a poor surface casing cement job, casing leak, or a
blowout in a nearby well. Upper sands can also be highly pressured if gas developments are
trapped by very rapid deposition. This last occurrence is, however, relatively rare.
However, the pore fluid density will act against the pressure at the hydrocarbon/water
contact. As a result, pressure at the top of the reservoir will be equal to the pressure at the
hydrocarbon/water contact minus the hydrostatic pressure of the hydrocarbon column.
This could be considered to be a u-tube situation, where one arm represents the fluid pressure
in the rocks at the hydrocarbon/water contact. This pressure acts along the contact plane,
pushing upward at every point against the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid trapped in the
reservoir. The second arm of the u-tube is the hydrocarbon zone within the reservoir. The top
of this arm is sealed by the presence of the over-lying cap rock.
2-12
B
D1
B
gas
A Hydrocarbon/Water
D2 Contact
At the hydrocarbon/water contact, the pressure will be that associated with the rocks
overlying the reservoir, measured at point A.
At the top of the reservoir (D1), theoretical normal pore pressure (Pn) is
2-13
The true pressure (Po) within the reservoir top, at point B, is given by
In this example the expected pressure in the top of the reservoir was 1.04 SG EMW, but a
pressure of 1.11 SG EMW was encountered. The reservoir was therefore overpressured with
respect to the enclosing rocks. Plotting these pressures as EMW against depth reveals
D1 1.11 SG
EMW
D2
1.04 SG
EMW
Figure 2-12: Plot of Mud Density Requirements Through Gas Bearing
Reservoir
In a hydrocarbon reservoir containing gas, oil and water the pressure at each of the contacts
may be similarly calculated.
cap rock
gas
oil
water
2-14
In field exploration conditions, the density and thickness of the hydrocarbon zones will be
uncertain at the time the reservoir is drilled. These pressure profiles can be constructed by
plotting the pressure measurements from Modular Dynamics Tester (MDT) type tools
against depth (see also section 3.1.1).
If the well where measurements are first taken is not located at the summit of the anticline
(which is normal exploration procedure) the depth of the top of the anticline can be estimated
from the seismic profiles, and pressure extrapolation using MDT data carried out over the
depth interval between the top of the reservoir and the hydrocarbon/water contact. This
enables the drilling fluid program for subsequent wells to be planned with some confidence.
It follows that the maximum drilling fluid density requirement occurs at the highest point in
any hydrocarbon zone.
If sufficient overbalance exists as the reservoir is first penetrated, then there will be
sufficient to control the entire reservoir unit.
Note that sealing beds (for example clays) may occur within thick, reservoir-quality,
sandstones. Each clay bed represents a potential cap rock above a different reservoir unit
from the one above, and all precautions normal for reservoir penetration should be in force as
each potential seal is encountered. Not all potential seals will be effective, especially if the
bed is penetrated by naturally occurring fractures. If the seal is not efficient, the profiles
seen in figures 2-12 and 2-13 above will apply.
In summary, the lower density of hydrocarbon compared to that of the original pore fluids
(seawater or fresh water) will cause an overpressure relative to the pressure experienced at
the hydrocarbon/water contact to develop in all reservoir formations, whether they are
economically viable or not.
2-15
2.4.4 Hydrocarbon Generation
The alteration of organic carbon-rich material (kerogen) into liquid and gas hydrocarbon
fluids is generally accepted as causing a considerable volumetric increase, quoted as up to
25% by some authors. Meissner and Banks (2000) use the relationship below to calculate the
volume of hydrocarbon generated within a source rock:
Vg= A.T.TOC.Q.F
where
Vg = Volume of generated hydrocarbons
A = Area of source rock
T = Thickness of source rock
TOC = Total Organic Carbon expressed as decimal fraction of source rock volume
Q = Ultimate Yield (function of kerogen type)
F = Ultimate Generation (function of source rock maturity)
In a limited pore-space environment, such as a sedimentary rock at depth, this extra fluid is
unable to expand easily so must become overpressured. This extra pressurisation should also
be experienced by the pore fluids already present within the rock.
The chemical reactions leading to hydrocarbon generation are also exothermic in nature.
This added heat supply will also tend to boost the pressure of (especially) gases in confined
pore spaces.
Lee and Deming (2002) found that the source rocks within the Anadarko Basin in Oklahoma,
USA, were associated with the areas of maximum overpressuring in the basin. This
disproved earlier ideas that the overpressures were associated with undercompaction within
the rocks during their initial burial. This was anomalous given the age of the rocks in
question and the permeability of the seals. Source rock maturation timing better explained the
pressure and permeability scenario
In a typical sedimentary sequence, the geothermal gradient can be expected to range from 0.6
to 1.4C/30 m. Thus for an isolated formation fluid, pressure resulting from aquathermal
effects may range from 0.305 to 0.713 bars/m. Magara (1975) used a figure of 0.317 bars/m
for the Gulf Coast of the USA and showed that, through aquathermal pressuring, an
overpressured sequence may become equal to the overburden pressure.
For example, a shale sequence with pore pressure 250 bars becomes isolated at 2440 m. If
this formation is then buried to 6100 m, the pore pressure becomes
2-16
i.e. approximating to total overburden pressure (assuming overburden gradient of 0.226
bars/m (Dickinson 1953)).
Aquathermal pressuring could therefore be used to account for areas where the pore
pressure is equal to overburden pressure. This will depend ultimately on the quality of the
seals. Argillaceous rocks have low permeability (10-6 to 10-7 mD), but not zero permeability.
Consequently they will leak over time when significant pressure differentials are created
across the claystone.
Note that the increased pore fluid pressure will eventually act against the diagenetic process,
as the pressure causing expulsion of the fluid from the clay layers equilibrates with the pore
fluid pressure. As a consequence, diagenesis is eventually halted by overpressures. This
phenomenon is used as a qualitative pressure indicator when studying shale factor results
(section 4.6).
Although this pressure is actually hydrostatic, it gives the illusion of overpressure because
of the large fluid column height in the aquifer compared with the column height of drilling
fluids in the well (compare H with h in figure 2-15). The green potentiometric surface
connects the exposure of the aquifer on the mountainside with an exposed spring at lower
elevation, whereas the red surface reflects an aquifer with no exposure. In both cases H – h
represents the head of water driving the well.
This mechanism produces artesian wells, which are of great importance as a water source in
desert environments. Many of the major fountains in cities around the world were originally
artesian in nature, for example those in Trafalgar square, London.
2-17
. Potentiometric Surface
(no exposure, no spring)
H Potentiometric Surface
Connects exposure to spring
elevation
Sand bed
2-18
2.6.1 Depletion Through Production
Subnormal pressures are commonly created when hydrocarbons and/or water are produced.
Note however that depletion refers to pore pressure reduction relative to initial reservoir
pressure. Thus a reservoir may be depleted but still overpressured relative to hydrostatic.
Production (even when compensated for by a strong water drive) will progressively reduce
pore pressure and therefore cause compaction. In turn, this may lead to land subsidence in
the production facility area (e.g. chalk reservoirs located in the Central North Sea area).
Where freshwater aquifers have been tapped the reduction in hydrostatic head can cause
subnormal pressure. As an example, the Texas Panhandle has gradients ranging from 0.83 to
0.90 SG EMW due to this mechanism, compared with 1.00 SG EMW for fresh water.
2.6.2 Precipitation
In arid areas such as the Middle East or North Africa, the water table may be found hundreds
of metres below the surface. As a consequence of this, underpressured formations may
develop as the hydrostatic gradient only commences at the water table, causing a subnormal
gradient when measured from the surface. The terms overpressure, underpressure and
normal pressure are controlled here to a large extent by the location of the pressure
measurement datum (e.g. mean sea level or drill floor elevation).
2.6.4 Osmosis
Strong salinity contrasts in lenticular sand bodies are favourable to osmotic action that may
result in subnormal pressures. In the Morrow Sands (Oklahoma) there is a regional transition
from under- to overpressures.
However, the magnitude of this effect is very small. With a thermal gradient of 0.83C/30 m
the fluid gradient at 6100 m would be 1.00 SG EMW compared to 1.02 SG EMW.
2-19
2.6.6 Epeirogenic Movements
Changes in elevation can cause abnormal pressures in some formations open to the surface
laterally but otherwise sealed. Thus if the outcrop is raised, the formation pressure becomes
abnormally high and vice-versa.
Pressure changes are seldom caused by changes in elevation alone, since associated erosion
and deposition are also significant factors. Loss or gain of water-saturated sediments is also
important.
Underpressured Overpressured
2.7 CONCLUSIONS
Overpressures can be grouped into two main categories. Pore pressures derived from
porosity response can be markedly different depending on which of these categories applies
to the rocks under study. Where Type I overpressure is in existence the porosity behaviour
is closely related to pressure.
2-20
However in Type II mechanisms, the porosity is often severely reduced following earlier
burial, and later in situ fluid generation boosts the pressure to a value considerably greater
than that predicted by porosity responses. This has serious implications when considering the
use of compaction trends with older deformed rocks.
Loading
Unloading
0 Effective Stress
Figure 2-16: Shale Porosity Response to Loading and Unloading
2-21
2-22