Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Andrew Henderson
Prof. Archer
ENGL 20803
23 April 2019
Jeffrey Dahmer, John Gacy, Edmund Kemper, these names bring to mind thoughts of
vicious acts of killings that left their imprint on American minds for years to come. They were
horrible, gruesome murders that shocked the nation and confused many people how it was
possible that human beings could do this to one another without being caught. There has been
much debate regarding the idea of how these men were driven to become serial killers, such as
whether or not individuals are born like this or if there are underlying events that lead them to
this from their upbringing as a child. The behavior of various serial killers can more often than
not be traced back to childhood abuses or neglect, and in so doing can provide explanations and
Jeffrey Dahmer, born May 21, 1960 to Joyce and Lionell Dahmer in Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
is a notorious serial killer who in his lifetime committed 17 murders. He was a gruesome killer,
raping and dismembering his victims, mostly consisting of boys and younger men. He even
resorted to cannibalism at one point, eating the flesh of his victims for the sole purpose of
possessing absolute control. Dahmer’s first murder was not like the others. His primary murder
spree took place mostly in the early 1990s, but Dahmer got his first taste for blood in 1978 when
he was only 18 years old. Weeks after graduating high school, Dahmer was driving along the
road and found a young Steven Hicks on his way from a rock concert. Dahmer invited Hicks into
his home under the presumption that the two would drink some alcohol and continue the party
Henderson 2
that Hicks had just come from. After hanging out for a while, Steven expressed his desire to
leave and be on his way, but Dahmer simply “didn’t want him to” so he struck him over the head
multiple times with a dumbbell weight (Purcell 77). Then he strangled him on the floor, stripped
off his victim’s clothes and pleasured himself over the dead 19-year-old. From there he began the
process of dealing with the remains of the boy, he dissected the body in the basement of his
house and dissolved the body parts in acid. The flesh-acid solution was then poured down the
drain and then Dahmer smashed the bones into dust and tossed the flurries of powder in the
woods in his backyard (Higgs 14). It all seemed too simple for the high school graduate and
afterwards he was calm and collected. His parents had moved out of the home since they were
just recently divorced, so nobody was home, and it was highly unlikely that anyone would be
looking for the boy in Milwaukee since he was out of town. Jeffrey Dahmer got his first taste for
blood on that fateful day in June, and from that point on he felt this necessity to kill, an
underlying feeling that gnawed at his very being until he killed again. Dahmer had this incessant
As an infant, Dahmer was severely neglected by his mother and father. His mother refused to
breastfeed him because she found it tedious and tiring. His father, Lionel, was always at work
performing his studies which left little Jeffrey Dahmer devoid of any care or attention received
by any parental figure in his life. This would later lead Dahmer to a life of solitude, but for now
it simply was a part of his childhood development. His mother ill and with a father needing to
take of her, Dahmer found himself often times alone (Masters 27). Growing up, Dahmer is not
what you would classify as a normal kid. He had alcohol abuse issues, as well as social exclusion
throughout his years in high school. As a loner, Dahmer found himself with an increasing
fascination with the dissection of animals. Son of a chemist, Dahmer had an ample supply of
Henderson 3
various acids to which he would dissolve the flesh and bones of dead animals that he had found
or killed himself. At the age of four, Dahmer began collection the bones of rats and other rodents
that were roaming around his property. He would pick up the bones and let them fall into his
hand, “oddly thrilled by the sound they made.” (Silva 2). From this early fascination with
animals, the future serial killer then began putting his focus on the human body and feeling an
innate desire to understand and see how the skeleton was interconnected. By the time he reached
puberty and developed sexually, this desire brought itself forward with full force and began to
consume Dahmer’s way of life. While he was in high school, he “stole a shop-window dummy
and lay with it in bed when his parents were not home” (Martnes 300). This would be
foreshadowing to some of Dahmer’s future actions that he would later commit in his murderous
years. Jeffrey Dahmer was deprived of control all of his life. He had no control over his parents’
divorce at home, he was a loner at school and bullied somewhat, and then as a homosexual
Dahmer found frustration with expressing his desires. He was a man who had no control in
nearly every aspect of his life. He possessed a human shaped object that he solely had complete
and utter dominance over, especially with regards to sex. Dahmer sought out to have a zombie-
esque sex slave in which he had authority over it. Eventually Dahmer’s pseudo sex slave was not
enough for his desires and he soon found himself prowling the local night clubs in search of
potential victims.
Edmund Kemper in his childhood had a horrible relationship with his mother behind closed
doors. He was born a very large baby, weighing in at 13 pounds. As a young boy Kemper found
a fascinating with cruelty to animals. He buried the family cat alive, and then once it had died,
decapitated the head and placed it on a stick. Kemper was very close to his father and was
devastated when they split and forced to live with his mother. They had a horrible relationship
Henderson 4
together; she was an alcoholic which did not help their already fragile connection. He was
constantly verbally abused and berated by his mother, often hearing on a daily basis what a
disappointment he was and how he should’ve never been born. She would lock him in the closet
out of fear that he would hurt his sisters. There was nothing he could do about it either, because
his mother had absolute control over her son. Later in life at the age of 15, he got into an
argument with his grandmother and fatally shot her in the back of the head with a hunting rifle,
then proceeded to kill his grandfather before he found out about his wife being dead. He was
diagnosed with multiple mental disorders and placed in a psychiatric hospital (Bonn). Growing
with severe mental and physical abuse drove Kemper to process stress and anger in very
different ways than a normal individual would. Therefore, for someone to have that kind of
upbringing it would be seen as almost assumed that he would lash out in the way he did.
John Wayne Gacy was born in Chicago, Illinois to Marion and John Stanley Gacy. Here
Gacy had a traumatic upbringing, primarily from his father. Gacy’s father was an alcoholic and
would constantly physically abuse his son, often for being overweight. It would not be a rare
occurrence to find Mr. Gacy beating his son with a leather belt for very simple mistakes while
working on cars out in the garage. His father would do this on a regular basis, and also give
verbal abuse, often stating that he was “never good enough” (Cahill 1986). His mother attempted
to protect Gacy from his abusive father, but this was only met with more insults and abuses from
his father. Mr. Gacy was trying to do what he felt would make his son a man, but the pain he put
his son through at such a young age lead Gacy to commit countless numbers of murders on
young boys. This sexual desire Gacy possessed toward children began as a child, when he was
caught attempting to fondle another girl his age, to which Gacy was beat with a leather belt yet
again. That same year, Gacy was molested by a contractor that was a family friend of the Gacy’s.
Henderson 5
He did not feel as though he could tell his father about these abuses and traumatic experiences
because he was deathly afraid his father would beat him as a result of it. As a student, Gacy was
a bit of a loner because of his weight and he was not involved in any sports due to a heart
problem. This left the poor boy as an easy target for bullying by other children. The world John
Gacy lived in was one of constant verbal and physical abuse that was inescapable. Later on in
life, Gacy would murder a total of 33 teenage boys throughout his criminal career.
For most of the 20th century, it was a widely held belief that criminals are born the way they
are, not made. In a comparison of individuals, there is a higher likelihood of criminal behavior if
the individuals in question are born with various genetic disorders such as schizophrenia. People
are more prone to exhibit criminal like behavior if they are born with these issues in oppose to
individuals without them. In addition to this, people born into families of past criminal behavior
are more likely to become criminals themselves. Children of criminal parents are more than
twice as likely to exhibit criminal behavior themselves. From this we can understand that
individuals can be born to commit crime at a higher probability than an individual with no
criminal parents. There is a transfer of criminal life from generation to generation within the
United States. This can obviously be attributed to things such as socioeconomic status or drug
abuse, but nevertheless there still is a higher chance of breaking the law. Men are also more
likely to commit criminal acts than women are, so by that logic men are more likely to become
serial killers than women are (Dennet). Some people are naturally born to be killers, in that they
have a higher likelihood of going into a life of crime merely from having a biological criminal
parent. Babies grow up watching their parents to understand how to correctly act in the world.
So, if a child is going through and seeing their parents act a certain way, then that child will
believe that this is the correct way that individuals operate in daily life. In essence, it appears as
Henderson 6
though some people are predisposed to become criminals in the future, or at least have a higher
chance of it.
Childhood neglect more often than not will start within their family. As a baby they
become attached to their parent, so when the parents are neglectful, abusive, or in general not
around, this has been linked to impulsive behavior, delinquency, drug and alcohol abuse, and
suicide. Families are a child’s first figures in the socialization process and if a child has a
neglectful family, the associated outcomes are usually impulsive behavior, delinquency, drug or
alcohol abuse, and even suicide. If children do not receive a proper upbringing then they won’t
know how to socially interact with other people, so that leads to them being a target from others
later in life. They are most at risk when they are very young. Child maltreatment is one of the
deadliest forms of neglect. Without the support from one’s family at a very young age, children
will exhibit behavior that lashes out at others. They express characteristics that would differ from
the societal norm, and in the process, they are further excluded of society. From a child’s very
early stages of life, they are constantly learning. They are always taking in new information,
processing it, and then outputting a response, however simple it may be. Those events that a
child undergoes can have a lot of impact on their development and eventually elicits personality
traits later on in adult life. Childhood trauma has a direct link to behavioral changes in adulthood.
Children that are neglected are more likely to be depressed later on in adulthood than a child that
received proper care. A child that experiences constant abuse will more often than not grow up
with various negative traits. Inability to deal with stress and anger is one of the primary factors
that is most commonly seen in children with abusive parents. The moral character of children can
greatly be affected if they are abused and or neglected. If you were to compare two adults, one
that was neglected and abused, “differences [would be] found between maltreated and
Henderson 7
nonmaltreated children’s moral and social judgments.” (Hildyard 682). This is applicable to our
argument through the idea that it might seem plausible that our killers would not be able to
distinguish the true moral nature of their murders. To them, killing might seem not as horrible of
alcohol or drugs, physical abuse, or exclusion from society can all be observed and given
treatment for through the means of therapy. These individuals that have had poor upbringings
have an impulse to kill in the way that they do, and they more often than not will do it as a way
of obtaining control. They lack a coping mechanism to deal with the stresses they have endured
throughout the entirety of their lives. This underlying instinct to have control is more often than
not something that arises from childhood, therefore being able to recognize these habits and
actions early on would limit or even eliminate the serial killer’s obsessive compulsion to kill. If
individuals of rough backgrounds are to exhibit the signs of serial killers in the way that Dahmer,
Gacy, or Kemper did, then it would be beneficial to them and society to intervene and offer
treatment, so that the vicious acts of killings would not occur. These men have had severe
childhood developmental problems that have played a key role in the actions that they later
undertook in life where they murdered countless numbers of people. These serial killers suffered
from mental problems, childhood neglects and abuses, and above inability to operate normally in
related to coping mechanisms, it can reasonably be inferred from the research that being able to
recognize these problems at an early age would be beneficial to children around the world. By
intervening and placing children in special care, where they can receive proper treatment, we
Henderson 8
would be able to severely diminish crime and murders, especially with regards to serial murders
like those of Jeffrey Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy, and Edmund Kemper.
The stories of Jeffrey Dahmer, Edmund Kemper, John Wayne Gacy are all filled with
stories of tremendous sadness and pain. They were brought into this world dealing with issues
that a normal individual would never have to deal with on a daily basis. They were all verbally
abused, neglected, and tormented by their parents that drove them to lash out in the way that they
did. Proper childcare plays a primary role in the development to adulthood and these men simply
were not raised in a loving environment so it would seem inevitable that they would grow up to
become vicious murderers that left their imprint on society for years to come. Their upbringings
Works Cited
Bonn, Scott A. “The Real Life Horror Tale of the Twisted ‘Co-Ed Killer.’” Psychology Today,
horror-tale-the-twisted-co-ed-killer.
Cahill, Tim (1986). Buried Dreams: Inside the Mind of a Serial Killer. Bantam Books. ISBN 0-
Dennett, Daniel. “Are Criminals Born or Made?” Prospect Magazine Are Criminals Born or
violence-adrian-raine-daniel-dennett-review.
Higgs, Tamara, "Jeffrey Dahmer: Psychopathy and Neglect" (2012). All Regis University eses.
240. h ps://epublications.regis.edu/theses/240
Hildyard, Kathryn L, and David A Wolfe. “Child Neglect: Developmental Issues and
Outcomes.” Child Abuse & Neglect, U.S. National Library of Medicine, June 2002,
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12201162.
Martens, W. H. J. "Loneliness and Associated Violent Antisocial Behavior: Analysis of the Case
Reports of Jeffrey Dahmer and Dennis Nilsen."I nternational Journal of Offender Therapy and
Masters, Brian (1993). The Shrine of Jeffrey Dahmer. Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 978-0-340-
59194-9.
Henderson 10
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). “Children of Criminal Parents Have a
2017, phys.org/news/2017-11-children-criminal-parents-greater-chance.html.
Purcell, Catherine E.; A. Arrigo, Bruce (2006). "5". The Psychology of Lust Murder: Paraphilia,
Sexual Killing, and Serial Homicide. New York City: Academic Press. p. 77.
Silva, J. Arturo, Michelle M. Ferrari, and Gregory B. Leong. “The Case of Jeffrey Dahmer: