Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
LaToya M. Morgan
Spring 2019
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 2
Context
During the 2017-2018 school year, Banneker High School implemented the Personalized
Learning Initiative of introducing 1:1 technology for all students using Microsoft Surface
Tablets. This initiative is a part of Fulton County School’s Personalized Learning Program.
According to Banneker High School’s 90-Day Action Plan (2017), the 1:1 devices were to be
used in class to provide differentiated and personalized instruction. Unfortunately, the 1:1
devices were not used consistently throughout the building. There was not a solid plan to support
teachers in integrating technology into their lessons. Factors such as a lack of consistent
professional development, students not bringing devices to class, and inconsistent wi-fi all lead
to teachers being hesitant to integrate technology. As a school, there was one mandatory
technology integration professional development session. With this lack of support, teachers that
were not comfortable or lack the skill to integrate technology, reverted to the method of teaching
with which they were most comfortable (Gorski, 2005). Because of the lack of teacher
comfortability with technology, the tablets were not utilized with fidelity. This project sought to
provide technology integration professional development to teachers to help address this lack of
offered to teachers to increase the comfort level of technology integration, the frequency of
technology integration, and the rigor level of technology integration. The professional
development sessions were to be offered monthly between the months of October to March. The
2018, technology integration was to be increased by 40% and by March 2019, the rigor level of
technology integration would increase by 30%. The rigor of technology integration would be
measured by Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Teachers would require students to use technology on
the levels of analyzing, evaluating, and creating. Additionally, teachers would receive periodic
lists of researched-based technology tools that could be easily implemented in their lessons.
During the time of writing the Capstone proposal, there was the assumption that I would
transition from a classroom teacher to an instructional technology coach. The activities outlined
in my Capstone proposal would be the cornerstone of my work during the 2018-2019 school
year. Unfortunately, things did not go as planned, and I remained in the classroom. Also, the
school decided to give select teachers class sets of Microsoft Surface Tablets, instead of
distributing them to every student. The select teachers were teachers of Georgia Milestones
The spirit of the Capstone Project was carried out, but due to the responsibilities of being
a teacher and teacher leader within the building, several things were changed. Instead of
providing the five professional development session within the departmental PLCs, “Super
Saturday” was organized. This was a professional development offered to the teachers on
Saturday mornings. Teachers could choose from four to five technology workshops to attend to
learn how to integrate technology into their classrooms. This was the result of a meeting with the
School Improvement Specialist. The purpose of this meeting was to figure out how technology-
based professional development could still provide to the teachers under the circumstance of me
still being in the classroom. We met in August and decided to provide sessions during “Super
Saturday.” Because the school is a recipient of the School Improvement Grant, the school had
the funds to pay teachers to come learn on Saturdays. After the meeting, a Needs-Assessment
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 4
Survey (Appendix A) was emailed to understand the technology needs of the teachers. In the
survey, teachers indicated their frustration level with technology, the frequency of technology
use, their goals for technology use, and which platforms they would like to learn about
(Appendix B). Based on the data, the topics of the first Super Saturday, which took place on
September 22, 2018, were determined. Also within the survey, teachers could sign up to present
during the first Super Saturday. From the results, the presenters for Super Saturday were
gathered. Emails were sent, and flyers were passed out to advertise Super Saturday to teachers
(Appendix I). During the first Super Saturday, 4 sessions were offered, and 24 participants
engaged in the technology professional development workshops. Based on the evaluation survey,
the participants felt that the workshops were useful, and their time was well spent. Each
workshop was rated 4.92/5 or above (Appendix D). As a follow-up, many participants asked for
more sessions on the new topics learned. A newsletter was sent to teachers highlighting Super
The next Super Saturday was scheduled for October 27, 2018. Flyers were distributed,
and emails were sent to advertise the event (Appendix I & J). Five sessions were offered, but
only 12 participants showed up. The decrease in participants was the result an equally important
event happening at the school. During the first Super Saturday, there were no other programs
happening at the school. During the second Super Saturday, teachers offered Saturday School.
Saturday School is an opportunity for teachers to offer Saturday tutorial. Many of the teachers
who participated during the first Super Saturday chose to participate in Saturday School to have
extra time with their students. Even with low participation, the participants rated October’s Super
Saturday 5/5. The workshops offered earned a 4.83/5 or better (Appendix E). A newsletter was
sent to teachers highlighting Super Saturday, teachers who were embedding the new practices
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 5
learned during the first two Super Saturdays, and an easy technology tool that could be integrated
To combat the issue of competing events, I spoke with the School Improvement
Specialist and administrators to see if Super Saturday and Saturday School could be offered on
alternating Saturdays. I understand the importance of offering Saturday School and did not want
to prevent any teacher, including myself, from participating in giving students more time.
Unfortunately, the administration team did not allow for the two events to occur on opposing
Saturdays because of funding and the logistics of supervision. A decision between the School
Improvement Special and myself was made to cancel the Super Saturday offered on December
8th to allow all teachers to participate in Saturday School. A new plan was developed to host the
on January 18, 2019. All teachers would be required to attend (Appendix J). I advocated for
(GAETC). The teachers attending the GAETC would be the presenters during the January 18th
teachers were highlighted who were using technology. Data from a school visit from the Fulton
County School’s South Learning Community’s Area Executive Director cited the use of
technology in the classrooms of Banneker High School as a “glow” from his visit (L. Morgan,
personal communication, December 2018). The teachers who were highlighted not only
increased the use of technology in their classrooms, but the Bloom’s revised level increased to
The last technology professional development occurred on January 18th. To prepare for
this event, the presenters were gathered and emails were sent to advertise. January 18th was a
teacher professional development day, therefore, all teachers were required to attend. Teachers
could choose from two workshops, 55 minutes each. During the last 30 minutes of the day,
teachers were given time to explore and apply the new technology tools learned during the
sessions. There was a total of 9 sessions to choose from during each time slot. These sessions
ranged in difficulty level and Bloom’s revised taxonomy level (Appendix J). 75 participants
attended the first session. The number of participants tapered off during the second session, only
59 participants attended the second session. The reason for the reduction of attendants is
unknown. Based on the survey data, the participants rated the event 4.88/5, citing their time well
The last benchmark survey is the evaluation survey. Its purpose was to gauge whether
teachers believe the frequency of technology usage in their classroom and quality of technology
increased (Appendix G). The original capstone set the goals of 40% of teachers to increase the
frequency of technology usage in their classrooms and 30% increase in the rigor of technology
usage. This was changed because not all teachers participated in the technology professional
development. Because of this, the goals of 40% and 30% will be based on the participants, and
not the entire school. As a follow-up plan, teachers will continue receiving choice technology
professional development quarterly throughout the school year. This will occur as a result of
speaking to the Media Education and Technology Instructor (METI) at our school. Individual
teachers that indicated needing a follow up coaching session will receive tutorials during their
planning and tutorial videos. For example, one of the participants requested instructions on how
to upload and share a PowerPoint through the online Office 365 platform to Schoology so that
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 7
his students could access and interact with the PowerPoint. A video will be made and sent to him
Discussion/Reflection
Executing this capstone project has presented many lessons. Altering the project to fit my
teacher schedule, instead on an Instructional Technology Coach schedule took away some of the
key factors of the project, such as working one-on-one with more teachers, increasing the
development opportunities to a wider range of teachers. One of the benefits of changing the
organization and logistics of the capstone project was spotlighting talented teachers within the
building to present technology tools and strategies to their peers (Appendix K).
Another hurdle that compromised the fidelity of the original capstone project was
offering the technology professional development on the same day as other important school
initiatives. Through this process, I have learned the importance of involving multiple people in
the planning process to make sure important overlapping events do not happen. I also learned
that having the support of school administrators gave me the opportunity to plan the last
technology professional development on a teacher workday. These days are usually planned by
school administrators and the instructional leadership team. It was an honor for them to allow me
Out of all the lessons learned, the biggest lesson was learning ways to get hesitant
teachers on board. Many of the teachers who came to the first two optional Super Saturdays
came because they wanted to learn about technology, but some came because of the relationships
that I built with them. Relying on flyers and emails alone did not prompt teachers to attend Super
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 8
Saturday. Being more intentional about building relationships with the teachers and staff would
help with getting them more involved in the technology professional development. As learned
previously in the program, building relationships is the cornerstone of good coaching (Knight,
2007).
The capstone project sought to address PSC Elements 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.6, 3.1, 3.6, 5.1,
5.2, and 5.3. PSC Element 1.1, 2.6, 3.6, 5.1, and 5.2 were addressed in the first phase of the
capstone project. Creating a shared vision with the School Improvement Specialist, which was
based on the needs-assessment surveys, helped when designing the professional development
offerings throughout this experience. Technology tools were evaluated based on what the
teachers stated they needed to help them integrate technology. PSC Elements 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, and
3.1 were addressed when developing the subject of the workshop offerings. I made sure that the
offerings ranged in rigor to address all teachers, those who were uncomfortable with technology
to those who wanted to increase the rigor level of technology use in their classrooms. I presented
effective classroom management strategies needed to carry out the content of my workshop. PSC
Element 5.3 was addressed when synthesizing the data of the evaluation survey (Appendix H).
The data showed that, overall, the program was effective at its goal. According to teacher survey
responses, teachers’ skills improved, their content knowledge deepened, and the integration of
If conducting the capstone again, I would recommend reducing the capstone to be more
manageable for a teacher to execute. As stated previously, it was written to be carried out by an
instructional technology coach. I would also recommend using a formal tool to gauge the
points, such as the feedback from the Area Executive Director’s school visit and the highlights of
a few participating teachers. I would recommend sending a survey during the midpoint.
Unfortunately, the data is not comprehensive because only 29 teachers and staff
participated in the survey. According to the survey, 72.4% of the teachers cited that their
technology integration increased, compared to the last school term. 82.8% of teachers cited the
technology professional development as the reason why technology strategies were integrated
more in the lessons this school year. 90% of the teachers who took the survey are using
technology in their classrooms at least once a week. 72.4% are using technology more than once
a week. According to the data, the technology professional development sessions were successful
in increasing the use of technology at Banneker High School (Appendix H). To improve the
participation of the survey, I would visit each professional learning community meeting to speak
with the teachers and encourage them to take the survey. This would give a true gauge on how
effective the professional development sessions were. Please see the appendices for detailed data
points.
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 10
References
http://www.fultonschools.org/en/divisions/acd/learncomm/AchievementZone
Gorski, P. (2005). Education equity and the digital divide. AACE Journal, 13(1), 3-45.
Appendix A
Appendix B
Question 1:
Question 3:
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 14
Question 4: What goals do you have for integrating technology in your classroom?
SELECT RESPONSES
To increase student To use technology 75% of maximizing my students'
engagement class time learning experiences
I want to become more I'm hoping to go more and I would like to use
familiar with new and more paperless. I'd be more technology as a tool to assist
different platforms to ensure interested in participating in my CTI students with lesson
that all students are flexible the Saturday events if I knew completion, extension
and knowledgeable with exactly what was going to be activities to support their
technology covered ahead of time. I don't growth. When I was in the
want to sit through material classroom I used quizlet,
that I don't find helpful. edmodo, kahoot. As
department chair I would like
to expose our new teachers to
some of the tools to enhance
their classrooms as well.
I want my students to be able Utilizing more technology for I want to use technology as a
to use technology students to create and present way to enrich my student's
independent of the classroom project and project ideas; learning and use it in
to become life-long learners student blogging; creating conjunction with my teaching
personalized teaching videos instead of just using it as an
for flipped classes assessment tool or as a place
to house relevant information.
I want to put on my work on I will be flipping my Create engaging activities
schoology and have students classroom this year, so the that will stimulate learning,
to access it as well as using more I can do with the tablets facilitate collaboration, and
illuminate for testing and in class, the less copies I have individualized instruction.
using the online textbook. to make!!!
I want to create an To increase my students time management,
environment for blended exposure to online resources differentiating instruction,
learning. that will enhance and instant feedback to students
supplement the information etc...
that I present to them.
Using edgenuity for My goal is to help the student To make life easier for me!
remediation learn in a fun and different
way from the norm.
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 15
Question 5:
Question 6:
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 16
Appendix C
Appendix D
Session Results:
Question 10: What was the most valuable thing you learned today?
SELECT RESPONSES
I loved how Ms. Lang The Microsoft Hacks I learned how to incorporate
showed how to utilize the QR workshop is going to help me DOK levels on Illuminate
code in an actual lesson plan. send out documents to my when selecting test questions.
Rather than just teach us how students that they can edit and I also learned how to BCC
to MAKE a QR code, she send back to me in real time, people, and what that means.
showed how to use it all without the use of paper. I also learned what the
effectively in a lesson. Not Also it will make parent Immersive Reader feature is
just the what....the how! communication easier. and how to use it.
There were several things that The most valuable thing I The analysis of data using
I will use. Both sessions were learned is having the Illuminate. Mr. Carlisle is an
very helpful. :) opportunity to incorporate Amazing Teacher. Attending
QR codes in my work and his session was well worth
utilizing Microsoft forms. I the price of admission.
am too excited.
How to keep the class How to use Microsoft In Edgenuity Class I learned
engaged through the use of Outlook to contact parents to add groups and I was able
QR codes more efficiently Popplet to see the classes that were
Using QR codes to aid with already set up. The ones that
understanding were already set up gave me
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 18
Question 11: Would you like any follow-up support in anything learned? If so, what kind of
support would you like? Please include your name in your response.
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 19
Question 12: Are there any additional technology strategies or technology tools you would like
help with?
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 20
Appendix E
Session Results:
Question 10: In the next two weeks, which new tech-related strategy or tool will you be using?
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 21
Question 13: Would you like any follow-up support in anything learned? If so, what kind of
support would you like? Please include your name in your response.
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 22
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
Question 2: Describe your experience with the Tech PD offered during Super Saturday and/or
January's AZ Day. Include highlights and improvements.
SELECT RESPONSES
I had no idea that Newsela Newsela is going to help me Motivated to use more
included math articles! incorporate STEM in my technology.
everyday classroom routine.
Experience was good. I My knowledge and comfort Tech pd’s are helpful and
learned new technology I level for using technology in great reminders to continue
didn't know about. the classroom has increased incorporating technology in
tremendously my lessons
I love the digital book. I have It was worth my time. I have I really enjoyed attending the
not used it yet with the been playing with the Super Saturday sessions.
students because we do not different technologies shown They were informative and
have full access for everyone to get more comfortable using tailored to the technologies
of my students to benefit them. that I was interested in
from it learning about. Each
instructor was knowledgeable
and made their sessions easy
to follow. It was also really
helpful to have time built in
to actually practice what
we’ve learned so that we can
see it in action.
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 25
The PD sessions were I was exposed to many great we ask for classes but the
informative and innovative. tech options for my classes we ask for are never
classroom. I have begun the offered
implementation process but
have not introduced it fully to
my classes.
Question 4: What obstacles or challenges have you experienced while integrating technology this
year?
SELECT RESPONSES
Learning curve. I'm not always consistent Some students don’t have
internet access at home.
Limited technology for the Learning curve with new Sometimes the surface pro
students technology and incorporating will to spin too long when
it into my existing course. students log in.
It has been much smoother It hasn’t been a huge Some of the students have no
for me this year because I obstacle, but sometimes the access to technology outside
have worked through the tablets would malfunction or the school, therefore we must
kinks give student error messages start and finish during class
which would make it difficult period.
to implement new strategies
using technology.
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 26
Question 5: Moving forward, what type of support do you need to help you integrate technology
for the upcoming school year?
SELECT RESPONSES
Continue to have a class set Nearpod is something I'm Just a little more lead time to
of surface pros!!!! They are going to look to implement better incorporate it into my
amazing! during the summer. classes.
Time to practice it would be nice if they Devices
offered the classes we ask for
Time Continued support from Additional workshops
SMEs and IT
If we could be able to go see Would like to find an easier
a teacher use technology in I would love to learn how I way of using the technology
the classroom or have a can use social media to my to track my data for my
teacher model it for us in our advantage rather than fighting Activating Strategies and Exit
classroom, I think that might against it in my class. ticket so that it is not so
be helpful for those that need cumbersome when you have
extra support. a high number of students
CAPSTONE REPORT PART B #1 27
Appendix I
Appendix J
Appendix K
https://www.smore.com/1wf4j-super-saturday-10-27
https://www.smore.com/fwyqp-super-saturday-9-22