FOR HIGHLY PROFICIENT TEACHERS (MTI/MTII/MTIII/MTIV)

Name of Teacher: Learning Area: Mathematics

COT 1 COT 2 COT 3 COT 4 RPMS-IPCRF
COT Indicator
No. COT RPMS 5- COT RPMS 5- COT RPMS 5- COT RPMS 5- RPMS Rating for QUALITY Objective
Rating pt Scale Rating pt Scale Rating pt Scale Rating pt Scale No. PROTECTED AREA for RPMS Rating
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L)
1 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 3 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 4 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 5 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 7 0 0

AVERAGE OF USE THE TABLE

ENCODE YOUR COT RATINGS IN FOR COLUMNS (C), (E), (G), and (I), USE BELOW TO OBTAIN
COLUMNS (B), (D), (F), and (H) THE TABLE BELOW TO TRANSLATE YOUR ENTRIES IN YOUR RPMS RATING
COT RATING TO ITS EQUIVALENT IN THE COLUMNS (C), (E), FOR QUALITY, THEN
RPMS 5-POINT SCALE (G), and (I) ENCODE IN IPCRF

RPMS Rating for

COT Rating RPMS 5-pt Scale Range Quality
8 5 4.500-5.000 5
7 4 3.500-4.499 4
6 3 2.500-3.499 3
5 2 1.500-2.499 2
4 1 below 1.499 1
ECTED AREA for RPMS Rating For Quality

0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0!
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled May 22.50% Quality Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective No acceptable
Education Knowledge effective 2018-April applications of applications of applications of applications of evidence was
Services and Pedagogy applications of 2019 content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge shown
content knowledge within and across within and across within and across within and across
within and across curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum teaching areas as teaching areas as teaching areas as teaching areas as
teaching areas. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable ### ### #DIV/0!
4 lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues colleagues and
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by supported by any 1
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other MOV
MOV given MOV given given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Collaborated May Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposed action No acceptable
Education with colleagues in 2018-April completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
Services the conduct and 2019 disseminated research with colleagues colleagues shown
application of action research colleagues
research to enrich with colleagues
knowledge of
content and Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
### #DIV/0!
pedagogy. 4 of the given MOV the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
MOV shown
 knowledge of
content and ### #DIV/0!
pedagogy.

Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 3. Developed and May Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable
Education applied effective 2018-April effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
Services teaching strategies 2019 strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
to promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical
and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative
thinking, as well as thinking, as well as thinking, as well as thinking, as well as thinking, as well as
other higher-order other higher-order other higher-order other higher-order other higher-order
thinking skills. thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
### ### #DIV/0!
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
more lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in MOV 1 and shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by any
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of the other MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV given
given given given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with May 22.50% Quality Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and No acceptable
Education Environment colleagues to 2018-April shared effective shared effective shared effective shared effective evidence was
Services and Diversity model and share 2019 classroom classroom classroom classroom shown
of Learners effective management management management management
techniques in the strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
management of engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
classroom activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
structure to done in different done in different done in different done in different
engage learners, physical learning physical learning physical learning physical learning
individually or in environments as environments as environments as environments as
groups, in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 ### ### #DIV/0!
meaningful with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
 individually or in
groups, in ### ### #DIV/0!
meaningful
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
hands-on activities 4 lessons lessons supported lessons supported supported by any evidence was
within a range of supported by MOV by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any of the acceptable shown
physical learning 1 and any 1 of the 1 of the other 1 of the other MOV
environments. other acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 5. Exhibited May Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable
Education effective and 2018-April and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence shown
Services constructive 2019 behavior behavior behavior behavior
behavior management skills management skills management skills management skills
management skills by applying by applying by applying by applying
by applying positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
positive and non- violent discipline to violent discipline to violent discipline to violent discipline to
violent discipline to ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning-
ensure learning- focused focused focused focused
focused environments environments environments environments
environments. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
### ### #DIV/0!

Efficiency Applied at least 7 Applied at least 7 Applied at least 7 Applied any of the No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given given strategies as evidence shown
strategies as strategies as strategies as observed in only 1
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 lesson
least 4 lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness

Basic 6. Worked with May Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable
Education colleagues to 2018-April colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues but no evidence shown
Services share 2019 in the school level to department or evidence of
differentiated, district/cluster level share lesson grade level to sharing with others
developmentally to share lesson share lesson
appropriate
opportunities to
address learners’
differences in ### #DIV/0!
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
Services share 2019
differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate
opportunities to
address learners’ Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at least No acceptable
differences in 1 lesson as 1 lesson as 1 lesson as 1 lesson, as evidence shown ### #DIV/0!
gender, needs, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidenced by
strengths, interests MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and either MOV 2 or 3
and experiences. supported by any supported by any supported by any but no evidence of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV sharing with others

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and May 22.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Education and Planning applied effective 2018-April applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
Services strategies in the 2019 strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing shown
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced learning process learning process learning process learning process
teaching and as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
learning processes 1 with a rating of 8 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 6 1 with a rating of 5
to meet curriculum
requirements and ### ### #DIV/0!
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
varied teaching 4 lessons as lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
contexts. evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Basic 8. Reviewed with May Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable
Education colleagues, 2018-April collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
Services teacher and 2019 reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
learner feedback to and learner and learner and learner and learner
plan, facilitate and feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
enrich teaching evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the
practice. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

### #DIV/0!
 plan, facilitate and
enrich teaching
practice.

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher review of teacher shown ### #DIV/0!
and learner and learner and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 9. Advised and May Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable
Education guided colleagues 2018-April advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
Services in the selection, 2019 in the selection, selection, in the selection, selection, shown
organization, organization, organization, organization, organization,
development and development and development and development and development and
use of appropriate appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning resources, learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources
including ICT, to as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
address specific MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
learning goals.
### #DIV/0!

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource shown
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Worked May 22.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable
Education and Reporting collaboratively with 2018-April reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
Services colleagues to 2019 collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment tools shown
review the design, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues as
selection, with colleagues as with colleagues as with colleagues as shown in the MOV
organization and shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
use of a range of submitted submitted submitted
effective
diagnostic,
formative and Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable ### #DIV/0!
summative 4 assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
assessment as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
strategies in any of the in any of the in any of the any of the
consistent with acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
curriculum
requirements.
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 11. Interpreted May Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
Education collaboratively 2018-April collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with evidence was
Services monitoring and 2019 colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the shown
evaluation interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
strategies of assessment data assessment data assessment data assessment data
attainment data to as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
support learner MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
progress and
achievement.
### #DIV/0!

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
2 different types of 3 of the same kind 2 of the same kind the MOV evidence was
MOV of MOV of MOV shown

Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in May Quality Consistently Frequently applied Occasionally Rarely applied No acceptable
Education the effective 2018-April applied skills in the skills in the applied skills in the skills in the evidence was
Services communication of 2019 effective effective effective effective shown
learner needs, communication of communication of communication of communication of
progress and learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and
achievement to progress to progress to progress to progress to
key stakeholders, parents/ guardians parents/ guardians parents/ guardians parents/ guardians
including as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
parents/guardians. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

### #DIV/0!

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 of the acceptable MOV MOV MOV evidence was
MOV shown

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed May 10% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
Education various related 2018-April performed special performed special performed special special tasks evidence was
Services works/activities 2019 tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or and/or shown
that contribute to assignments as assignments as assignments as assignments as
the teaching- shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
learning process. submitted submitted submitted submitted
### #DIV/0!
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
4 different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness

RATING FOR
OVERALL
#DIV/0! ###
ACCOMPLISH-
MENTS
 ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

0 0
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: 0 Name of Rater: 0

Position: 0 Position: 0
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: 0 Date of Review: December 30, 1899
Rating Period: 0

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 3 7.5% #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 4 7.5% #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 6 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 7 7.5% #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 9 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 10 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 12 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

0 0 0
Ratee Rater Approving Authority