1.design of UT at KM 44.875 PDF

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
UPPER PENNAR PROJECT
NAME OF WORK: - Lifting of water from Jeedipalli Reservoir to Feed

Upper Pennar Project, Proposed Somaravandlapalli and Puttakanuma
Reservoirs Including CM & CD works, Somaravandlapalli and
Puttakanuma Reservoirs Distributory system to feed an ayacut of 25,000
acres in Ananthapuramu District.
DESIGN OF UNDER TUNNEL AT KM 44.875
CONTRACTOR
M/s. MEIL
S-2, TIE, BALANAGAR, HYDERABAD – 500 037.
INDEX
1. Report
2. Hydraulic Design of Under Tunnel
3. Design of Head walls
4. Structural design of Barrel
5. Design of Wing walls
6. Site Survey
7. Structural drawings
UPPER PENNAR PROJECT-JEEDIPALLI RESERVOIR
NOTE ON DESIGN FEATURES - UNDER TUNNEL AT KM 44.875
INTRODUCTION:
HNSS PROJECT (PHASE-II) is major project covering district of Ananthapuramu for Providing Irrigation
Facility. Lifting of water form Jeedipalli Reservoir to feed Upper Pennar Project and formation of,
Proposed Samaravandla Palli & Puttakanuma Reservoirs to feed an ayacut of 25,000 acres in
Ananthapuramu District.
The Main Canal from Jeedipalli Reservoir to Feed Pennar Project, Revised hydraulic Particulars from
i.e., km 0.000 to km 53.452 are approved by Chief Engineer (Projects), Water Resources Department,
Ananthapuramu on Letter dated 27-02-2019.
The MAIN CANAL OF JEEDIPALLI RESERVOIR on its way is crossing the existing Stream at Km. 44.875
Bed level of the stream is +539.579m as against the CBL of +538.573m and FSL of +540.223m and
hence an Under Tunnel is proposed.
HYDRAULIC PARTICULARS OF CANAL AT km 44.875

S. No. Description Particulars Units
1 Discharge (Required) 6.586 Cumecs
2 Discharge (Designed) 6.707 Cumecs
3 Bed Width 4.000 M
4 F.S.D 1.650 M
5 Side Slopes(Soils) 1.5:1
6 Surface Fall 1 in 3100
7 Value of ‘n” 0.030
8 Velocity 0.628 M/Sec
9 Canal Bed Level +538.573 M
10 Full Supply Level +540.223 M
11 Top Of Bank Level +540.723 M
HYDROLOGY OF DRAIN:
S. No. Description Particulars Units
1 Catchment Area 0.726 Sq Km
2 Max Flood Discharge 15.259 Cumecs
3 Drain Bed Level +539.579 M
The M.F.D. is worked out to 15.259 Cumecs by using Dicken’s formula. The MFL computed with the cross
sections at c/s 0.00m at centre.
HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS AND FIXING OF VENT WAY: The bed level of the leading channel at U/S
end of transition is +539.798m. The canal bed level is + 538.573m and the barrel floor level is fixed at
+536.973m and it is negotiated with One vertical drop height 2.825m proposed at up - stream side of box.
The floor of the barrel is kept horizontal at +536.973m. To pass the M.F.D of 15.259cumecs. Two vents of
size 2.10m x 1.20m (Barrel) proposed. The section of tail channel proposed as 11.300 m x 1.500m with side
slopes of 1.5: 1.
FOUNDATIONS: 450 mm thick C.C. in M-15 grade with 40mm M.S.A is proposed for foundations of wings
and returns. The foundation level of the wings and returns are taken up to +536.419 on U/S and +535.924m
on D/S. The stresses worked in concrete and on soils are shown in the stress table.
ABUTMENTS, WINGS AND RETURNS: Wings and returns are designed in accordance with T.V.A.
procedure treating the earth fills on wall as stepped back. The angle of internal friction of soil is taken as 28°
and the angle of friction between earth and wall face is taken as 14°. The unit weight of saturated earth and
cement concrete is taken as 2.1 t/m3 and 2.4 t/m3 respectively. The top width of the wing walls on U/S & D/S
(max. section) are proposed as 0.50 m with vertical face on water side and sloped face on earth side. The
base width of the wing walls on U/S is proposed as 2.900m (maximum section) and designed for retaining
earth pressure of back fill. The base width of the wing walls on D/S is proposed as 2.200m and designed for
retaining earth pressure of back fill. The wing and returns are proposed in CC M-15 grade with 40mm MS.A.
The stresses developed in concrete and on soils are shown in the stress table.
STRESS TABLE
Stress in Concrete Stress on Soils
S.NO. Description in t/m2 in t/m2
Max Min Max Min
1) U/S & D/S Head wall 5.376 2.696 - -

2) U/S WING WALL (at drop) & Return wall 22.575 -1.243 19.122 2.092
3) U/S WING WALL at (@Junction with barrel) 17.544 -1.786 14.112 1.576
4) DS WING WALL(junction with barrel) 16.107 -1.001 13.075 2.057

5) DS WING WALL(MIN) & RETURN WALL 14.310 -1.436 11.210 1.706
6) R.C.C BOX UNDER EARTH BANK - - 7.706 -
Barrel: The barrel is analyzed for the following case:

Box under Earthen Bank & Head wall
1) Drain Full
2) Drain Empty
Box under Canal
1) Drain Full and Canal Full
2) Drain Full and Canal Empty
3) Drain Empty and Canal Full
4) Drain Empty and Canal Empty
Above all cases are analyzed in STAADPro and design of Box using MS Excel spread sheet using Maximum
Bending moment, Shear and axial forces. The Top Slab and Bottom Slab are proposed in 300mm thick. The
End Vertical and Middle members are proposed in 300 mm thick. Box proposed in RCC M30. The Box is
analysed and Maximum moments, Shear and axila forces are considered for design box. .The reinforcement
details are shown in the drawing.
PROTECTION WORKS: The U/S transition is proposed for a length of 7.800m and D/S transition is proposed
for a length of 10.200 m. The U/S approach channel is protected with 300 thick Bed Pitching for length of
3.000m and Revetment for a length of 5.000m and The D/S Tail channel is protected with 300 thick Bed
Pitching for length of 3.00m and Revetment for a length of 5.000m.
The design is prepared based on the relevant provisions of IS Codes keeping in view the stability, safety and
feasibility and all the design calculations and the drawings are enclosed herewith for your kind perusal and
needful approval.
UPPER PENNAR PROJECT
JEEDIPALLY RESERVOIR TO UPPER PENNAR RESERVOIR
UNDER TUNNEL AT Km. 44.875
Hydraulic particulars of Canal:

Discharge (required) = 6.586 Cumecs
Discharge (designed) = 6.707 Cumecs
Bed width = 4.000 m
FSD = 1.650 m
Free Board = 0.500 m
Velocity = 0.628 m/sec
Side slopes = 1.5 :1
coefficient of rugocity = 0.03
Bed fall = 1 in 3100
CBL = 538.573 m
FSL = 540.223 m
TBL = 540.723 m
Bank widths L / R = 6 + 3m
Ground Level @25m U/S = 539.798 m
Ground Level @ centre level = 539.579 m
Ground Level @ 25m D/S = 539.492 m
Hydraulic Particulars of Stream
2
Catchment area 'M' = 0.726 Km
M = 0.28 Sq. Miles
Discharge 'Q' as per Dicken's formulae
Q = CM3/4
Where C = 1400 (If CA is less than 1 Sq. Mile)
= 1200 (If CA in between 1 to 30 Sq. Mile)
= 1060 (If CA is more than 30 Sq. Mile)
In this design the 'C' value = 1400
Max. Flood Discharge 'Q' = 1400 x 0.28^ 3/4

= 538.886 Cusecs
= 15.259 Cumecs
2
Accerlation due to gravity 'g' = 9.81 m/sec
Design of vent way
Discharge = 15.259 Cumecs
Proposed width of vent way = 2.1 x 1.2 m
No of vents = 2 Nos
Size of haunches = 0.15 x 0.15
Thickness of wearing coat in barrel = 0.075
2
Area of haunches for one vent = 0.028 m
Net area of vent way = (2.1 x 1.2 - 0.028) x 2
2
= 4.984 m
Velocity in the vent = 15.259 / 4.984
= 3.062 m/sec
As per Table 2 Cl. 8.1.2.2. of IS 7784 (part 1):1993
Max permissile velocity in the barrel is for face of concrete grade below M30 = 6 m/sec
As per the note 1 of under table 2 of cl. 8.1.2.2 of I.S. 7784 (part 1) : 1993
the permissible value is further redused by 25% i.e. V= 4.5 m/sec
HENCE SAFE
Since the velocity in the Barrel is less than the permisble velocity it is O.K.
Hence we are adopting the barrel section of 2 vent of size 2.1 x 1.2 m
Box Dimensions:
Top slab thickness = 0.3 m

Bottom slab thickness = 0.3 m
External side wall thickness = 0.3 m
Intermediate wall wall thickness = 0.3 m
No of intermediate walls = 1
Flow width of vent = 2.1 x 2
= 4.2 m
Inner width of vent way including intermediate walls
= (2.1 x 2) + (0.3 x 1)
= 4.5 m
Fixing of drain bed level
Canal Bed level = 538.573
thickness of lining = 0m
Thickness of sealing coat over barrel = 0.1 m
Top level of barrel top slab = 538.573 - 0 - 0.1

= 538.473 m
=
Bottom level of top slab = 538.473 - 0.3
= 538.173 m
Bed level in the barrel = 538.173 - 1.2

= 536.973 m
Top level of barrel bottom slab = 536.973 - 0.075

= 536.898 m
Bottom level of barrel bottom slab = 536.898 - 0.3

= 536.598 m
Canal lining 0 m and sealing coat of 0.1 m over barrel

CBL + 538.573
538.473
538.173
2 vents of 2.1 x 1.2 m 1.2 m

2.1 m
Stream B.L.536.973 536.898

536.598
Wearing coat inside barrel 0.075 m thick

Longitudinal section of barrel:
6m 10.45 m 3m
539.973 539.973
4m
23.45 m
Transitions
Up stream:
Width of transition at beginning = 12.3 m
Width of transition at end = 4.5 m
Side splay proposed = 1 in 2
Length of transition provided = 7.800 m
Down stream:
Width of transition at beginning = 11.3 m
Width of transition at end = 4.5 m
Side splay proposed = 1 in 3
Length of transition provided = 10.2 m
MFL CALCULATIONS
Calculaton of bed fall of vagu:
Ground Distance in
Location Bed fall "n" 1/n
Sl. No level m
Bed level on U/S of vagu at Km. 475 545.301
1 950 0.008391 119.175
Bed level on D/S of vagu at Km. -475 537.330

2 700 0.008641 115.727

3 500 0.00863 115.875

4 300 0.009063 110.339

5 150 0.008393 119.147
Total 580.263
Average bed fall = 580.263 / 5

= 1 In 116.053
= 0.008617
TOTAL DISCHARGE ( Q ) = 15.259 cumecs

PERCENTAGE = 100 %
DISCHARGE ( Q ) = 15.259
COEFFT.OF RUGOSITY 'n' = 0.025
ASSUMED WATER LEVEL = 540.010 m
SURFACE FALL = 1 IN 116.053
ASSUMED SURFACE FALL = 0.008617
MFL calculations at confluence point (i.e., C/C 0.0 m )

Chainge Ground Horizontal Depth of Average Horizontal
Ground level Area
point level Distance flow depth Distance
-25 540.324 540.010 0.000

5 0.000 0.000 0.000
-20 540.138 540.010 0.000
5 0.027 1.484 0.040
-15 539.956 539.956 0.054
5 0.137 5.000 0.685
-10 539.790 539.790 0.220
5 0.285 5.000 1.423
-5 539.661 539.661 0.349
5 0.390 5.000 1.950
0 539.579 539.579 0.431
5 0.423 5.000 2.117
5 539.594 539.594 0.416
5 0.368 5.000 1.840
10 539.690 539.690 0.320
5 0.261 5.000 1.307
15 539.807 539.807 0.203
5 0.154 5.000 0.770
20 539.905 539.905 0.105
5 0.070 5.000 0.352
25 539.974 539.974 0.036
50.000 0.431 41.484 10.485
SURFACE FALL ( S ) = 0.008617

MAX.DEPTH = 0.431 m.
WETTED PERIMETER = TOTAL HOR.DIST. + MAX.DEPTH
= 41.915 m.
AREA = 10.485 m²
R = 0.250 m.
R^2/3 = 0.397 m.
VELOCITY = 1.474 m/sec.
DISCHARGE = 15.5 cumecs. > 15.259
DESIGN OF TAIL CHANNEL
Stream discharge = 15.259 Cumecs
As per Cl. No. 8.1.2 of IS:7784 (Part 1), The water way of tail channel of approach channel can be
limited to 60 to 80 % of Lacey's regime wetted perimeter (LRWP)
Lacey's regime wetted perimeter (LRWP) = 4.8 √Q

= 4.8 x SQRT(15.259)
= 18.75 m
Consider 60% LRWP = 0.6 x 18.75
= 11.25 m
say 11.300 m
Bed width = 11.3 m

Assume depth of flow as = 1.500 m SAFE
Bed fall = 1 in 3500
coefficient of rugocity 'n' = 0.025
MFL
1.5 1.5 :1
Stream B.L.
11.3 m
Area (B + SD) D = (11.3 + 1.5 x 1.5) x 1.5

2
= 20.325 m
2
Perimeter B + 2D √(1+s ) = 11.3 + 2 x 1.5 SQRT (1 + 1.5²)
= 16.708 m
R = A/ P = 20.325 / 16.708
= 1.216
R2/3 = 1.139 m
S 1/2 = (1 / 3500)²
= 0.016903
There fore valocity as per mannings = 1/ n x R2/3 x S1/2

= 1.139 x 0.016903 / 0.025
= 0.77 m/sec
There fore discharge Q = A V = 20.325 x 0.77

= 15.65 Cumecs > 15.259 Cumecs
SAFE
TEL calculations
7 6 5 2 1
4 3
2 3
12.3 4.5 Stream flow 11.3

drop-1
4 Canal flow 3
7 6 5 2 1
7.800 23.45 10.20
Flow condition at section 1-1

Coefficient of rugocity 'n' = 0.025
Discharge 'Q' = 15.259 Cumecs
Bed level = 536.973
Flow depth = 1.5 m
Bed width = 11.3 m
Proposed U/S transition splay = 3 :1
Length of splay = (11.3 - 4.5) / 2) x 3
= 10.2 m
Area = (B+SD)D = (11.3 + 1.5 x 1.5) x 1.5
2
= 20.325 m
Velocity V1 = Q/A = 15.259 / 20.325
= 0.751 m/sec
Velocity head = V12/2g = 0.751² / 2x9.81
= 0.029 m
MFL = 536.973 + 1.5
= 538.473
TEL1 = MFL+ Velocity head = 538.473 + 0.029
= 538.502
Peremeter = B+2D√1+S2 = 11.3 + 2 x 1.5x SQRT(1+1.5²)
= 16.708 m
Hydraulic mean radius R= A/P = 20.325 / 16.708
= 1.216 m
Surface slope S1 = (V2 x n2)/ R4/3 = 0.751² x 0.025² / 1.216^(4/3)
= 0.000272 3676.471
M.F.L. + 538.473
1.5:1 1.5:1
1.5 m
Section 1 - 1
B.L. + 536.973
11.3 m
Bed level = 536.973
Side slopes = 0 :1
Flow depth = 1.494 m
Bed width = 11.3 m
Length from previous section = 0 m
Area = (B+SD)D = (11.3 + 0 x 1.494) x 1.494
2
= 16.882 m
Velocity V2 = Q/A = 15.259 / 16.882
= 0.904 m/sec
2
Velocity head = V2 /2g = 0.904² / 2x9.81
= 0.042 m
MFL = 536.973 + 1.494
= 538.467
= 538.509
Peremeter = B+2D√1+S2 = 11.3 + 2 x 1.494x SQRT(1+0²)
= 14.288 m
= 1.182 m
= 0.000212
Eddy losses HE = 0.5(V22/2g-V12/2g) = 0.5 x (0.042 - 0.029)
= 0.0065 m
Friction losses HF = (S1+S2) x L/2 = (0.000272 + 0.000212)x 0 / 2
= 0
TEL3 after losses = TEL1+HE+HF = 538.502 + 0.0065 + 0
= 538.509
Difference of TEL's = TEL2-TEL3 = 538.509 - 538.509
= 0.000
M.F.L. + 538.467
0:1 0:1
1.494 m Section 2 - 2
B.L. + 536.973
11.3 m

Bed level = 536.973
Side slopes = 0 :1
Bed width = 4.5 m
Length from previous section = 10.2 m
Area = (B+SD)D = (4.5 + 0 x 1.295) x 1.295
2
= 5.828 m
Velocity V3 = Q/A = 15.259 / 5.828
= 2.618 m/sec
= 0.349 m
MFL = 536.973 + 1.295
= 538.268
= 538.617
= 7.09 m
= 0.822 m
2 2 4/3
Surface slope S3 = (V x n )/ R = 2.618² x 0.018² / 0.822^(4/3)
= 0.002884
2 2
Eddy losses HE = 0.3 (V3 /2g-V2 /2g) = 0.3 x (0.349 - 0.042)
= 0.0921 m
Friction losses HF = (S2+S3) x L/2 = (0.000212 + 0.002884)x 10.2 / 2
= 0.01579
TEL5 after losses = TEL2+HE+HF = 538.509 + 0.0921 + 0.01579
= 538.617
= 0.000
M.F.L. + 538.268
0:1 0:1
1.295 m Section 3 - 3
B.L. + 536.973
4.5 m
Head loss calcuations inside barrel (using UNWIN's formulae)

Bed level = 536.973
Bed width = Vent width (B) = 2.1 m
Flow depth = Vent height (D) = 1.2 m
Number of vents = 2
Side slopes = 0 :1
Total water way width (i.e. excluding intermediate walls)
= 4.2 m
Total vent way width (i.e. including intermediate walls)
= 4.5 m
Size of haunches = 0.15 x 0.15 m
Thickness of wearing coat = 0.075
Area of haunches for single vent = 0.028
Peremeter of haunches for single vent = 0.264
Area =(B*D - area of haunches)x no of vents = (2.1 x 1.2 - 0.028) x 2
2
= 4.984 m
Velocity V4 = Q/A = 15.259 / 4.984
= 3.062 m/sec
= 0.478 m
Peremeter = ((B+D)x 2 - peremeter of haunches) x No of vents
= ((2.1 + 1.2) x 2 - 0.264) x 2
= 12.672 m
= 0.393 m
= 0.010553
2
Loss of head inside barrel 'h' = (1+f1+(f2xL)/R) x V /2g
Where
f1 = coefficient of loss of head at entry = 0.080
f2 = a(1+b/R)
Assume that the walls inside the barrel are plastered
a = 0.00316
b = 0.03050
f2 = 0.00316 (1+ 0.0305/ 0.393)
= 0.00341
There fore loss of head inside barrel 'h' = (1 + 0.08 + (0.00341 x 23.45 / 0.393)) x 0.478
= 0.613
TEL6 = TEL4 + h = 538.617 + 0.613
= 539.230
M.F.L. + 538.173
0:1 0:1
1.2 m Unwin's regeion
B.L. + 536.973
4.5 m

Bed level = 536.973
Side slopes = 0 :1
Bed width = 4.5 m
Area = (B+SD)D = (4.5 + 0 x 2.127) x 2.127
2
= 9.572 m
Velocity V5 = Q/A = 15.259 / 9.572
= 1.594 m/sec
= 0.13 m
MFL = 536.973 + 2.127
= 539.1
= 539.23
= 8.754 m
= 1.093 m
= 0.000731
TEL6 form UNWIN's formulae = 539.230
= 0.000
M.F.L. + 539.1
0:1 0:1
2.127 m Section 4 - 4
B.L. + 536.973
4.5 m
Bed level = 536.973 m
Side slopes = 0 :1
Proposed length of splay on D/S = 2 :1
Bed width (4.8 √Q) x 0.6 = 12.3 m
Area = (B+SD)D = (12.3 + 0 x 2.268) x 2.268
2
= 27.896 m
Velocity V6 = Q/A = 15.259 / 27.896
= 0.547 m/sec
2
= 0.015 m
MFL = 536.973 + 2.268
= 539.241
= 539.256
= 16.836 m
= 1.657 m
= 0.000049
= 0.023 m
Friction losses HF = (S5+S6) x L/2 = (0.000731 + 0.000049)x 7.8 / 2
= 0.003042
TEL8 after losses = TEL7+HE+HF = 539.23 + 0.023 + 0.003042
= 539.256
= 0.000
M.F.L. + 539.241
0:1 0:1
2.268 m Section 5 - 5
B.L. + 536.973
12.3 m
Flow condition at section 6 - 6 (i.e., at DROP 1 )
Bed level u/s , i.e. Crest level of the Drop = 539.798 m
Side slopes = 0 :1
Flow depth = 0.81 m
Length from previous section = 0 m
Bed width = 12.3 m
Area = (B+SD)D = (12.3 + 0 x 0.81) x 0.81
2
= 9.963 m
Velocity V7 = Q/A = 15.259 / 9.963
= 1.532 m/sec
2
= 0.12 m
MFL = 539.798 + 0.81
= 540.608
= 540.728
= 13.92 m
M.F.L. + 540.608
0:1 0:1
0.810 m Section 6 - 6
B.L. + 539.798
12.3 m
st
Design of 1 DROP :
M.F.L. at section 5 - 5 i.e., D/S side of the drop = 539.241 m
Crest level of the drop = 539.798 m
Discharge over the drop under drowned weir condition:
Q = Q1 + Q2
Q1 = 2/3 Cd1 √(2g) B h3/2
Q2 = Cd2 √(2gh) B h1
Q = 2/3 C d1 √(2g) B h 3/2 + C d2 √(2gh) B h 1
Discharge over the drop under free weir condition:
Q = Q1
Q = 2/3 Cd1 √(2g) B h3/2
In this case since the M.F.L. at section 5 - 5 is less than the crest level at section 6 - 6, the drop should
be designed as Free weir condition
Discharge required over weir = 15.259 Cumecs
Cd1 = 0.577
Cd2 = 0.800
B = 12.3 m
h = U/S and D/S water level difference over the drop
0.81 m
h1 = Head over crest on D/S side of drop
= 0
= 0 m
There fore the discharge over the weir
= Q = 2/3 Cd1 √(2g) B h3/2
= 15.278 Cumecs SAFE
Since the discharge provided over the crest is more than the
discharge required the design is Safe
Depth of flow over weir i.e., at section 6 - 6 = 0.81 + 0

d = 0.81 m
Depth of cistern = (d + h) / 4
= (0.81) / 4
= 0.200 m
Total drop height H = 539.798 - 536.973

= 2.825 m
Top width of drop = Depth of flow over weir / SQRT(γ)

where as γ is density of concrete
= 0.81 / SQRT (2.4)
= 0.500 m
Bottom width of drop =(Depth of flow over weir + drop height + thickness of
wearing coat + depth of cistern) / SQRT(γ)
= (0.81 + 2.825 + 0.075 + 0.2) / SQRT(2.4)
= 2.500 m
h = MFL level difference on U/S & D/S of drop = 540.608 - 539.241
= 1.367 m
Length of apron L = 2d + 2√(dh)
= (2 x 0.81) + (2 x sqrt(0.81 x 1.367))
= 3.700 m
L = 5√dh
= 5 x SQRT( 0.81 x 1.367)
= 5.300
Max of above two values shall be taken as length of apron = 5.300 m
Thickness of apron t = 0.55 x SQRT(d+ h)

= 0.55 x SQRT ( 0.81 + 1.367)
= 0.800 m
0.50
2.825 1st DROP
2.500 m 5.300 m
7.800 m
Bed level = 539.798 m
Bed width = 12.3 m
Area = (B+SD)D = (12.3 + 1.5 x 0.846) x 0.846
2
= 11.479 m
Velocity V8 = Q/A = 15.259 / 11.479
= 1.329 m/sec
= 0.09 m
MFL = 539.798 + 0.846
= 540.644 m
= 540.734 m
2
Peremeter = B+2D√1+S = 12.3 + 2 x 0.846x SQRT(1+1.5²)
= 15.35 m
= 0.748 m
2 2 4/3
Surface slope S7 = (V x n )/ R = 1.329² x 0.025² / 0.748^(4/3)
= 0.001626 615.006
= 0.006 m
Friction losses HF = (S7) x L/2 = (0.001626)x 0 / 2
= 0
TEL11 after losses = TEL9+HE+HF = 540.728 + 0.006 + 0
= 540.734
= 0.000
M.F.L. + 540.644
1.5:1 1.5:1
0.846 m Section 9-9
B.L. + 539.798
12.3 m
Section at Bed width Flow Side Velocity in Bed level M.F.L. T.E.L. T.E.L. w.r.t
in mts. depth slopes m/sec w.r.to Pre MFL
1- 1 11.300 1.500 1.5:1 0.751 536.973 538.473 0.000 538.502
2- 2 11.300 1.494 0:1 0.904 536.973 538.467 538.502 538.509
3-3 4.500 1.295 0:1 2.618 536.973 538.268 538.509 538.617
4-4 4.500 2.127 0:1 1.594 536.973 539.100 538.617 539.230
5-5 12.300 2.268 0:1 0.547 536.973 539.241 539.230 539.256
6-6 12.300 0.810 0:1 1.532 539.798 540.608 539.256 540.728
7- 7 12.300 0.846 1.5:1 1.329 539.798 540.644 540.728 540.734
SCOUR DEPTH CALCULATIONS
Up stream side:
Maximum flood diacharge of stream = 15.259 Cumecs

Bed width of approach canal = 12.3 m
Discharge per unit width 'q' = 15.259 / 12.3
= 1.241 Cumecs/met
As per Clause 8.5.2 of I.S. 7784 (Part-I) 1993
Assuming silt factor 'f' = 2
Normal scour depth = R = 1.35 x (q2 / f)1/3 = 1.35 x (1.241² / 2)^(1/3)
R = 1.237 m
Maximum scour depth on U / S side = 1.5 x R

= 1.5 x 1.237
= 1.856 m
MFL on up stream side from from TEL's = 540.644 m
Up stream cut off level = 540.644 - 1.856

= 538.788 m
Down stream side:
Maximum flood diacharge of stream = 15.259 Cumecs

Bed width of tail canal = 11.3 m
Discharge per unit width 'q' = 15.259 / 11.3
= 1.35 Cumecs/met
As per Clause 8.5.2 of I.S. 7784 (Part-I) 1993
Assuming silt factor 'f' = 2
Normal scour depth = R = 1.35 x (q2 / f)1/3 = 1.35 x (1.35² / 2)^(1/3)
R = 1.309 m
Maximum scour depth on D / S = 2.0 x R

= 2 x 1.309
= 2.618 m
MFL on down stream side from from TEL's = 538.473 m
Down stream cut off level = 538.473 - 2.618

= 535.855 m
There fore provide D / S cut off level = 535.800 m
Up Streamand Down stream Head wall
1 0
540.723
W6
2 :1 0.5
539.973 0.5 W5
W4
1.5
W1
W3 W2
538.473
A
0 0.5 1m
1.5 m
Top width = 0.500 m

Front batter = 1.000 m
Rear batter = 0.000 m
Bottom width = 1.500 m
Slope of soil above head wall = 2 :1
T.B.L. = 540.723 m
Top level of head wall = 539.973 m
Bottom level of head wall = 538.473 m
Height of soil above top head wall = 0.75 m
Dencity of concrete = 2.4 t/m2
Dencity of soil = 2.1 t/m2
Kv = 0.075
KH = 0.3006
Sl.No. Load Magnitude Force Lever arm at A Moment about A

1 W1 0.5 x 1.5 x 2.4 1.800 0.250 0.450
2 W2 1/2 x 1 x 1.5 x 2.4 1.800 0.833 1.499
3 W3 1/2 x 0 x 1.5 x 2.4 0.000 0.000 0.000
4 W4 1/2 x 1 x 1.5 x 2.1 1.575 1.167 1.838
5 W5 1/2 x 1 x 0.5 x 2.1 0.525 1.167 0.613
6 W6 0 x 0.5 x 2.1 0.000 1.500 0.000
7 PV 0.075 x 2.1 x 1.5² 0.354 1.500 0.531
8 PH 0.3006 x 2.1 x 1.5² 1.420 0.630 -0.895
4.036
Sum of vertical loads ΣV = 6.054 Tonnes
Sum of Momemts M about 'A' = 4.036 T - m

Lever arm = ΣM / ΣF
= 4.036 / 6.054
= 0.667
Eccentricity = B/2 - Lever arm

= 1.5/2 -0.667
= 0.083
e max = 1.5 / 6
= 0.25
Stresses at A
F  6e 
Max Stress = P 1  b 
b
2
= 5.376 t/m
Min Stress = F  6e 
P  1  b 
b  
2
= 2.696 t/m
Check for sliding: = μ ΣV / Ph

= 0.7 x 6.054 / 1.42
= 2.984 > 1.5
Hence SAFE
Check for over turning: = ΣMR / ΣMO

= 4.931 / 0.895
= 5.509 > 2
Hence SAFE
DESIGN OF BARREL UNDER HEAD WALL /EMBANKMENT PORTION
Hydraulic particulars of Canal

Bed width = 4.000 m
FSD = 1.650 m
CBL = 538.573 m
FSL = 540.223 m
TBL = 540.723 m
Bank widths L / R = 6.000 + 3.00 m
Ground Level = 539.579 m
Bareel box parameters:

Maximum height of soil above barrel = 2.150 m
Width of barrel = 2.1 m
Height of barrel (including internal wearing coat) = 1.275 m
No of vents = 2 Nos
Thickness of wearing coat inside barrel = 0.075 m
Thickness of canal lining + soil fill over box = 0.1 m
Top slab thickness of barrel = 0.3 m
Bottom slab thickness of barrel = 0.3 m
External side wall thickness of barrel = 0.3 m
Internal side wall thickness (if any) = 0.3 m
Size of haunches inside barrel = 0.15 X 0.15 m
No of internal side walls = 1 Nos
Density of R.C.C. = 25 Kn/m3
Density of P.C.C. = 24 Kn/m3
Density of saturated soil = 21 Kn/m3
Density of water = 10 Kn/m3
Density of submerged soil = 11 Kn/m3
Coefficient of active earth pressure Ka = 0.33
0.3 2.1 0.3 2.1 0.3
0.3
1.275 1.875
0.3
5.1
2 VENTS
The box barrel is designed for BARREL FULL
Depth of water in the STREAM = 1.275 m

Depth of water in CANAL + free board = 0m
Loads acting on the barrel:
Load acting on the top of barrel due to saturated soil = 2.15 x 21

2
= 45.15 Kn/m
Load acting on top of barrel due to canal water = 0 x 10

2
= 0 Kn/m
Load acting on the top of barrel due to wearing coat over barrel = 0.1 x 24
2
= 2.4 Kn/m
2
Total load = 45.15 + 0 + 2.4 = 47.55 Kn/m
Load due to external side wall over the barrel = 53.76 Kn/m
Max of the above load considered in the design = (47.55 , 53.76)

= 53.76 Kn/m
Self weight of top slab = 0.3 x 25

2
= 7.5 Kn/m
Loads acting on the side wall of barrel:
Height of soil above top slab of barrel h1 = 2.15 m

Soil pressure acting at the top of side wall Kaγh1 = 0.33 x 2.15 x 21
2
= 14.9 Kn/m
Height of external side wall = 1.275 + 0.3 + 0.3

= 1.875
Height of barrel + Height of soil above barrel h2 = 2.15 + 1.875
= 4.025 m
Soil pressure acting at the bottom of side wall = 0.33 x 4.025 x 21
2
Kaγh2 = 27.893 Kn/m
Upward base pressure acting on the barrel:
Load acting on the top of barrel per meter run
A External load acting on the top of barrel (i.e., due to soil or head wall which ever is max.)
2
Max.external load acting on the top of barrel (soil or head wall) = 53.76 Kn/m
Total top width of barrel on which above load acts = 2.1 x 2 + 0.3x2 + 0.3x1
= 5.1 m
Max. external load acting on barrel per meter run = 53.76 x 5.1
= 274.176 Kn/m
B Self weight of box = top slab = 5.1 x 0.3
2
= 1.53 m
Bottom slab = 5.1 x 0.3
2
= 1.53 m
External side wall = 1.275 x 0.3 x 2
2
= 0.765 m
Internal side wall = 1.275 x 0.3 x 1
2
= 0.3825 m
Total self weight of barrel alone = (1.53 + 1.53 + 0.765 + 0.3825) x 25
= 105.1875 Kn/m
C Load due to wearing coat inside barrel = (0.075 x 2.1 x 24) x 2

= 7.56 Kn/m
D Load due to water inside the barrel = 2 x 2.1 x 1.275 x 10
= 53.55 Kn/m
There fore total load acting at the base of the barrel

= 274.176 + 105.1875 + 7.56 + 53.55
= 440.474 Kn/m
Base pressure acting = 440.474 / 5.1

= 86.367 Kn/m
Net upward pressure acting on the bottom slab of barrel

= 86.367 - 0.3x25 - 0.075x24
2
= 77.067 Kn/m
Safe bearing capacity of soil considered = 250 KN
Since the Safe bearing capacity (S.B.C.) of soil is more than the net upward pressure
acting on bottom slab of barrel, the design is SAFE
Vehicular load:
Class 'A' wheeled vehicular load is assumed to acting on the top of the barrel
Total load of both axels of Class 'A' wheeled vehicle as = 228 KN

per IRC - 6
Impact factor for Class A loading = 4.5 /(6+ L)
(As per cl. 211.20 of IRC 6:2000)
L = Effective span for single vent = 2.4 m
Impact factor = 4.5 / (6 + 2.4) = 0.536
As per fig 5 of IRC 6:2000, In any case if span is less than 3.0 m, 50% of
impact shall be considered.
In this case Since the span is less than 3, 50% of impact is considered in the design
= 0.5
As per Cl no. 211.6 of IRC 6:2000, When filling above the barrel is more than 0.60m, The
impact percentage to be aloowed in the design shall be assumed to be one half of what is
specified in clausec 211.2 & 211.3
In this design the earth filling above barrel is = 2.15
Hence impact % is = 1 + (0.5 / 2) = 1.25
There fore tha max wheel load including impact is = 1.25 x 228
= 285 KN
Distance between two axels of class 'A' vehicle = 1.8 m

Distance between two wheels of an axle of class 'A' vehicle = 1.2 m
Total dispersion of above load on the top of barrel =
(A dispersion angle of soil 45º is considered)
Width of dispersion in the longitudinal direction = 1.8 + 2.15 x 2
= 6.1 m
Width of disperson in the transverse direction = 1.2 + 2.15 x 2

= 5.5 m
Total dispersion area under class 'A' loading = 6.1 x 5.5

2
= 33.55 m
Max. load acting on the top of barrel due to class 'A' loading
= 285 / 33.55
2
= 8.495 Kn/m
Hydrostatic pressure at the bottom of the barrel =
[(0 + 2.15 + 0.1 + 0.3 + 1.275 + 0.3/2)] x 10
2
= 39.75 Kn/m
A= Total load acting on the top of the slab = 53.76 + 7.5 + 8.495
2
= 69.755 Kn/m
B= Total load acting on the bottom of the slab = 77.067 + 8.495

2
= 85.562 Kn/m
C= Internal water pressure on vertival wall = 1.275 x 10

2
= 12.75 Kn/m
D= Internal water pressure on bottom slab = 1.275 x 10

2
= 12.75 Kn/m
2
E= Total load acting on the top corner of the slab = 14.9 Kn/m
2
F= Total load acting on the bottom corner of the slab = 27.893 Kn/m
The box barrel is designed for BARREL EMPTY
Depth of water in the STREAM = 0m

Depth of water in CANAL + free board = 0m
Load acting on the top of barrel due to saturated soil = 2.15 x 21

2
= 45.15 Kn/m

2
= 0 Kn/m
2
= 2.4 Kn/m
2
Total load = 45.15 + 0 + 2.4 = 47.55 Kn/m
Load due to external side wall over the barrel = 53.76 Kn/m
Max of the above load considered in the design = (47.55 , 53.76)

= 53.76 Kn/m

2
= 7.5 Kn/m
Height of soil above top slab of barrel h1 = 2.15 m

Soil pressure acting at the top of side wall Kaγh1 = 0.33 x 2.15 x 21
2
= 14.9 Kn/m

= 1.875
Height of barrel + Height of soil above barrel h2 = 2.15 + 1.875
= 4.025 m
2
Kaγh2 = 27.893 Kn/m
2
= 5.1 m
= 274.176 Kn/m
2
= 1.53 m
2
= 1.53 m
2
= 0.765 m
2
= 0.3825 m
= 105.1875 Kn/m

= 7.56 Kn/m
D Load due to water inside the barrel = 2 x 2.1 x 0 x 10
= 0 Kn/m

= 274.176 + 105.1875 + 7.56 + 0
= 386.924 Kn/m

= 75.867 Kn/m

= 75.867 - 0.3x25 - 0.075x24
2
= 66.567 Kn/m
Since the Safe bearing capacity (S.B.C.) of soil is more than the net upward pressure acting
on bottom slab of barrel, the design is SAFE
Vehicular load:
Total load of both axels of Class 'A' wheeled vehicle as = 228 KN

per IRC - 6
Impact factor for Class A loading = 4.5 /(6+ L)
(As per cl. 211.20 of IRC 6:2000)
L = Effective span for single vent = 2.4 m
Impact factor = 4.5 / (6 + 2.4) = 0.536
As per fig 5 of IRC 6:2000, In any case if span is less than 3.0 m, 50% of
impact shall be considered.
In this case Since the span is less than 3, 50% of impact is considered in the design
= 0.5
As per Cl no. 211.6 of IRC 6:2000, When filling above the barrel is more than 0.60m, The
impact percentage to be aloowed in the design shall be assumed to be one half of what is
specified in clausec 211.2 & 211.3
In this design the earth filling above barrel is = 2.15
Hence impact % is = 1 + (0.5 / 2) = 1.25
There fore tha max wheel load including impact is = 1.25 x 228
= 285 KN
Distance between two axels of class 'A' vehicle = 1.8 m

Distance between two wheels of an axle of class 'A' vehicle = 1.2 m
Total dispersion of above load on the top of barrel =
(A dispersion angle of soil 45º is considered)
Width of dispersion in the longitudinal direction = 1.8 + 2.15 x 2
= 6.1 m
Width of disperson in the transverse direction = 1.2 + 2.15 x 2

= 5.5 m
Total dispersion area under class 'A' loading = 6.1 x 5.5

2
= 33.55 m
Max. load acting on the top of barrel due to class 'A' loading
= 285 / 33.55
2
= 8.495 Kn/m

[(0 + 2.15 + 0.1 + 0.3 + 1.275 + 0.3/2)] x 10
2
= 39.75 Kn/m
A= Total load acting on the top of the slab = 53.76 + 7.5 + 8.495
2
= 69.755 Kn/m
B= Total load acting on the bottom of the slab = 66.567 + 8.495

2
= 75.062 Kn/m
C= Internal water pressure on vertival wall = 0 x 10

2
= 0 Kn/m
D= Internal water pressure on bottom slab = 0 x 10

2
= 0 Kn/m
2
E= Total load acting on the top corner of the slab = 14.9 Kn/m
2
A
E E
C
D
F B F
******//// STAAD INPUT FILE////**************************
1. STAAD SPACE
2. START JOB INFORMATION
3. ENGINEER DATE 23-APR-18
4. END JOB INFORMATION
5. INPUT WIDTH 79
6. UNIT METER KN
7. JOINT COORDINATES
8. 1 0 0 0; 2 2.4 0 0; 7 0 1.575 0; 8 2.4 1.575 0; 9 4.80001 0 0
9. 10 4.80001 1.575 0
10. MEMBER INCIDENCES
11. 1 1 2; 6 7 8; 11 1 7; 12 2 8; 13 2 9; 14 8 10; 15 9 10
12. DEFINE MATERIAL START
13. ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
14. E 2.17185E+007
15. POISSON 0.17
16. DENSITY 23.5616
17. ALPHA 1E-005
18. DAMP 0.05
19. END DEFINE MATERIAL
20. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
21. 11 12 15 PRIS YD 0.3 ZD 1
22. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
23. 1 6 13 14 PRIS YD 0.45 ZD 1
24. CONSTANTS
25. MATERIAL CONCRETE ALL
26. SUPPORTS
27. 1 2 9 PINNED
28. LOAD 1 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE 1.BOX EMPTY
29. MEMBER LOAD
30. 1 13 UNI GY 75.062
31. 6 14 UNI GY -69.755
32. 15 LIN Y 27.893 14.9
33. 11 LIN Y -27.893 -14.9
34. LOAD 2 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE 2.BOX FULL
35. MEMBER LOAD
36. 1 13 UNI GY 85.562
37. 6 14 UNI GY -69.755
38. 15 LIN Y 27.893 14.9
39. 11 LIN Y -27.893 -14.9
40. 1 13 UNI GY -12.75
41. 11 LIN Y 12.75 0
42. 15 LIN Y -12.75 0
43. PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT ALL
43. FINISH
DESIGN OF BARREL UNDER HEAD WALL /EMBANKMENT PORTION
Design constants:
Grade of concrete M 30
2
σcbc = 10 N/mm
2
σst = 130 N/mm (on water side)
m = 9.333
k = 0.418
j = 0.861
Q = 1.799
2
σcbc = 10 N/mm
2
σst = 130 N/mm (on earth side)
m = 9.333
k = 0.418
j = 0.861
Q = 1.799
End Top slab: at centre (for SAGGING BM)
Thickness of slab = 0.3 m

= 300 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm
Moment = 25.521 Kn - m
Axial compression / tension = 15.157 KN
Diameter of straight bar = 16 mm

Diameter of cut bar = 0 mm
Effective depthe proposed = 300 - 40 - 16 / 2

= 252 mm
Lever arm = 252 - 300/2
= 102 mm
= 0.102 m
Moment due to axial force = 15.157 x 0.102

= 1.546 Kn - m
Total moment = 25.521 + 1.546

= 27.067 Kn - m
Effective depth required = √(M / Q. b)

= SQRT (27.067 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 122.66 mm < 252 mm
Hence SAFE
There fore effective depth provided = 252 mm
Area of steel required = M / σst j d

= 27.067 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 252
= 959.606
Minimum. Area of steel = 0.35% x 1000 x (D/2)
= 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm
Diameter of straight bar = 16 mm 201.062

Providing 16 mm dia straight bars at a spacing of 150 mm
Ast. Provided by straight bars = 201.062 x 1000 / 150
2
= 1340.413 mm
Diameter of crancked bars = 0 mm 0

Providing 0 mm dia crancked bars at a spacing of 300 mm
Area of steel provided by crancked bars = 0 x 1000 / 300
2
= 0 mm
Diameter of cut bars = 0 mm 0

Providing 0 mm dia cut bars at a spacing of 0 mm
Area of steel provided by cut bars = 0 x 1000 / 0
2
= 0 mm
Total area of steel provided = 1340.413 + 0 + 0

2 2
= 1340.413 mm > 959.606 mm
HENCE SAFE
There fore area of steel provided at middle
Straight bars of 16 mm dia at a spacing of 150 mm c/c
+
Crancked bars 0 mm dia at a spacing of 300 mm c/c
+
Cut bars 0 mm dia at a spacing of 0 mm c/c
End Top slab: at support (for HOGGING)

= 300 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm


= 250 mm
Lever arm = 250 - 300/2
= 100 mm
= 0.1 m

= 1.516 Kn - m
Total moment = 41.863 + 1.516

= 43.379 Kn - m

= SQRT (43.379 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 155.283 mm < 250 mm
Hence SAFE

= 43.379 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 250
2
= 1550.219 mm

2
= 1795.194 mm

2
= 0 mm
2
Carncked bars provided on to support (from sagging) = 0 mm

2 2
= 1795.194 mm > 1550.219 mm
HENCE SAFE
There fore area of steel provided at supports:
+
+
Crancked bars (from sagging) 0 mm dia at a spacing of 300 mm c/c
Check for shear:

Max. shear force intensities at the supports are as shown on diagram
70.89 KN
1.386 m
X= 1.014 m
96.960 KN
2.4 m
Max. Shear force of above case = 96.960 KN

Corroesponding distance 'X' from where it changes its sign (i.e. + or -) to Max. S.F.
= 1.386 m
Shear force at a distance of effective depth 'd' + half of the thickness
of support from centre line of the support
= 0.25 + 0.3/2
= 0.4 m
There fore the Maximum shear force at a distance of 0.4 m from the centre line of the support are
= 96.96 x (1.386 - 0.4) / 1.386

Max. Total shear force V = 68.977 KN
Nominal shear stress Tv = V / bd
= 68.977 x 1000 / 1000 x 250
2
= 0.276 N/mm
% of tension steel provided at supports = 100 Ast. / bd

= 100 x 1795.194 / 1000 x 250
= 0.718 %
Corroesponding permisible shear stress Tc from Table 23 of IS 456:2000
2 2
= 0.362 N/mm > 0.276 N/mm
Shear resisted by concrete Tc b d = 0.362 x 1000 x 250

= 90500.000 N
= 90.500 KN
Shear resisted by bent up bars Vs = Asv x σsv x sin 45
= 0 x 175 x 0.707
= 0.000 N
= 0.000 KN
Total shear resisted by concrete & bentup bars = 90.5 + 0
= 90.500 > 68.977
HENCE SAFE
Since the shear resisted by concrete & bent up bars are more than the required, Design of
reinforcement from shear criteria is not needed. HENCE O.K.
Distribution reinforcement:
For 300 mm thick For top steel = 0.35% x 1000 x (D/2)
Min % of steel required for less than 500mm thick slabs
(as per is:3370 part-2) = 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm
Provide 10 mm at 200 mm C/C (in AND out faces )
2
Ast provided = 785.4 mm
DESIGN OF SLABS
End Bottom slab: at centre (for SAGGING BM)

= 300 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm
Axial compression / tension = 0 KN

Total moment = 26.36 + 0

= 26.36 Kn - m

= SQRT (26.36 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 121.048 mm < 252 mm
Hence SAFE

= 26.36 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 252
2
= 934.541 mm

= 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm

2
= 1148.926 mm
Diameter of crancked bars = 0 mm 0

Providing 0 mm dia crancked bars at a spacing of 300 mm
Area of steel provided by crancked bars = 0 x 1000 / 300
2
= 0 mm

2
= 0 mm

2 2
= 1148.926 mm > 934.541 mm
HENCE SAFE
There fore area of steel provided at middle:

+
Crancked bars 0 mm dia at a spacing of 300 mm c/c
+
End Bottom slab: at support (for HOGGING)

= 300 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm


= 250 mm
Lever arm = 250 - 300/2
= 100 mm
= 0.1 m
Moment due to axial force = 0 x 0.1

= 0 Kn - m

= 47.765 Kn - m

= SQRT (47.765 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 162.944 mm < 250 mm
Hence SAFE

= 47.765 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 250
2
= 1706.96 mm

2
= 2094.393 mm

2
= 0 mm
2
Carncked bars provided on to support (from sagging) = 0 mm

2 2
= 2094.393 mm > 1706.96 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
+
Crancked bars (from sagging) 0 mm dia at a spacing of 300 mm c/c
Check for shear:
74.66 KN
1.405 m
X= 0.995 m
105.490 KN
2.4 m

= 1.405 m
= 0.25 + 0.3/2
= 0.4 m
= 105.49 x (1.405 - 0.4) / 1.405


= 75.457 x 1000 / 1000 x 250
2
= 0.302 N/mm

= 100 x 2094.393 / 1000 x 250
= 0.838 %
2 2
= 0.384 N/mm > 0.302 N/mm

= 96000.000 N
= 96.000 KN
= 0 x 175 x 0.707
= 0.000 N
= 0.000 KN
Total shear resisted by concrete & bentup bars = 96 + 0

= 96.000 > 75.457
HENCE SAFE
(as per is:3370 part-2) = 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm
2
DESIGN OF SLABS
End vertical slab: at centre (for SAGGING BM)

= 300 mm
Clear cover = 30 mm
Moment = 1 Kn - m


= 264 mm
Lever arm = 264 - 300/2
= 114 mm
= 0.114 m

= 8.081 Kn - m
Total moment = 1 + 8.081

= 9.081 Kn - m

= SQRT (9.081 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 71.048 mm < 264 mm
Hence SAFE

= 9.081 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 264
2
= 307.315 mm

= 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm

2
= 753.98 mm

2
= 0 mm
Total area of steel provided = 753.98 + 0

2 2
= 753.98 mm > 525 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
End vertical slab: at support (for HOGGING)

= 300 mm
Clear cover = 30 mm
Moment (at Face) = 10.789 Kn - m



= 264 mm
Lever arm = 264 - 300/2
= 114 mm
= 0.114 m

= 8.081 Kn - m
Total moment = 10.789 + 8.081

= 18.87 Kn - m

= SQRT (18.87 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 102.417 mm < 264 mm
Hence SAFE

= 18.87 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 264
2
= 638.589 mm

2
= 753.98 mm

2
= 0 mm

2 2
= 753.98 mm > 638.589 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
Check for shear:
15.16 KN
0.867 m
X= 0.708 m
18.542 KN
1.575 m

= 0.867 m
= 0.264 + 0.3/2
= 0.414 m
= 18.542 x (0.867 - 0.414) / 0.867


= 9.688 x 1000 / 1000 x 264
2
= 0.037 N/mm

= 100 x 753.98 / 1000 x 264
= 0.286 %
2 2
= 0.242 N/mm > 0.037 N/mm
HENCE SAFE
Since the Permisible shear stress Tc is more than the Nominal shear stress Tv, Shear reinforcement is
not needed, and the section is SAFE from SHEAR criteria,
(as per is:3370 part-2) = 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm
2
DESIGN OF SLABS
Middle vertical slab: at centre (for SAGGING BM)

= 300 mm
Clear cover = 30 mm
Moment = 1 Kn - m


= 22.621 Kn - m

= SQRT (22.621 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 112.135 mm < 262 mm
Hence SAFE

= 22.621 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 262
2
= 771.372 mm

= 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm

2
= 1005.31 mm

2
= 0 mm

2 2
= 1005.31 mm > 771.372 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
Middle vertical slab: at support (for HOGGING)

= 300 mm
Clear cover = 30 mm
Moment = 1 Kn - m


= 262 mm
Lever arm = 262 - 300/2
= 112 mm
= 0.112 m

= 21.621 Kn - m

= 22.621 Kn - m

= SQRT (22.621 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 112.135 mm < 262 mm
Hence SAFE

= 22.621 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 262
2
= 771.372 mm

2
= 1005.31 mm

2
= 0 mm

2 2
= 1005.31 mm > 771.372 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
Check for shear:
1.20 KN
0.630 m
X= 0.945 m
0.800 KN
1.575 m

= 0.945 m
= 0.262 + 0.3/2
= 0.412 m
= 1.2 x (0.945 - 0.412) / 0.945


= 0.677 x 1000 / 1000 x 262
2
= 0.003 N/mm

= 100 x 1005.31 / 1000 x 262
= 0.384 %
2 2
= 0.273 N/mm > 0.003 N/mm
HENCE SAFE
Since the Permisible shear stress Tc is more than the Nominal shear stress Tv, Shear reinforcement is
not needed, and the section is SAFE from SHEAR criteria,
(as per is:3370 part-2) = 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm
Provide 12 mm at 200 mm C/C (TOP AND BOTTOM )
2
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Software licensed to Megha Engineering & , Hyderaba Part
CONNECTED User: Not signed in
Job Title Ref
By Date23-Apr-18 Chd
Client File uT At km 44.875.std Date/Time 18-Apr-2019 18:12
Max: 41.863 kN-m
Max: 10.789 kN-m Max: -10.789 kN-m
Max: -25.520 kN-m Max: -25.521 kN-m
Y
Z X
Max: 26.359 kN-m Max: 26.360 kN-m
Max: 0 kN-m
Max: -47.765 kN-m
Print Time/Date: 18/04/2019 18:15 STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 21.00.01.12 Print Run 1 of 1
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Job Title Ref
Max: 96.960 kN
Max: 70.889 kN
Max: -15.157 kN Max: 15.157 kN
Max: -70.890 kN
Max: -96.959 kN
Max: 105.490 kN
Max: 74.660 kN
Max: 18.542 kN Max: 0 kN Max: -18.542 kN
Max: -74.659 kN
Max: -105.490 kN
Load 0 : Shear Y
Force - kN
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Job Title Ref
15.157 kN 15.157 kN 15.157 kN

70.889 kN 193.046 kN 70.890 kN
70.889 kN 0 kN 193.046 kN 0 kN 70.890 kN 0 kN
Load 1 : Axial Force

Force - kN
UNDER TUNNEL AT Km.44.875
BARREL UNDER CANAL BED PORTION
Hydraulic particulars of canal
Bed width = 4.000 m
FSD = 1.650 m
CBL = 538.573 m
FSL = 540.223 m
TBL = 540.723 m
Bank widths L / R = 6.000 + 3.00 m
Ground Level = 539.579 m
Bareel box parameters:

Maximum height of soil above barrel = 0.00m
Width of barrel = 2.10m
Height of barrel = 1.275m
No of vents = 2Nos
Thickness of wearing coat inside barrel = 0.075m
Thickness of canal lining = 0.1m
Top slab thickness of barrel = 0.3m
Bottom slab thickness of barrel = 0.3m
External side wall thickness of barrel = 0.3m
Internal side wall thickness (if any) = 0.3m
Size of haunches inside barrel = 0.15X 0.15 m
No of internal side walls = 1Nos
3
Density of MS pipe = 0 Kn/m
3
Density of R.C.C. = 25 Kn/m
3
Density of P.C.C. = 24 Kn/m
3
Density of saturated soil = 21 Kn/m
3
Density of water = 10 Kn/m
3
Density of submerged soil = 11 Kn/m
Coefficient of active earth pressure Ka = 0.33
0.3 2.1 0.3 2.1 0.3
0.3
1.275 1.875
0.3
5.1
TWO VENTS BOX
Case 1 : box Full and canal Full
Depth of water Barrel = 1.275 m
Depth of water in canal + free board = 2.15 m

Load acting on the top of barrel due to saturated soil = 0 x 21
2
= 0 Kn/m
Load acting on top of barrel due to canal water = 2.15 x 10
2
= 21.5 Kn/m
2
= 2.4 Kn/m
2
Total load = 0 + 21.5 + 2.4 = 23.9 Kn/m
Load due to head wall over the barrel = 0 Kn/m
Max of the above load considered in the design = (23.9 , 0)
= 23.9 Kn/m
2
= 7.5 Kn/m

Height of soil above top slab of barrel h1 = 0m
Soil pressure acting at the top of side wall Kaγh1 = 0.33 x 0 x 21
2
= 0 Kn/m
= 1.875
Height of barrel + Height of soil above barrel h2 = 0 + 1.875
= 1.875 m
2
Kaγh2 = 6.806 Kn/m

2
= 5.1 m
= 121.89 Kn/m
2
= 1.53 m
2
= 1.53 m
2
= 0.765 m
2
= 0.3825 m
= 105.1875 Kn/m

= 7.56 Kn/m
D Load due to water inside box = 2.1 x 1.275 x 10x2
= 53.55 Kn/m

= 121.89 + 105.1875 + 7.56 + 53.55
= 288.188 Kn/m
= 56.507 Kn/m
= 56.507 - 0.3x25 - 0.075x24
2
= 47.207 Kn/m

Since the Safe bearing capacity (S.B.C.) of soil is more than the net upward pressure acting on bottom slab of barrel,
the design is SAFE
Vehicular load: No vehicle In canal Portion
Total load of both axels of Class 'A' wheeled vehicle as per IRC = 0 KN
-6
Hydrostatic pressure acting on the barrel:

Assuming that 100% of hydrostatic pressure acting on the barrel
Hyrostatic pressure acting on the top of the barrel =

[(2.15 + 0 + 0.1 + 0.3/2)] x 10
2
= 24.00 Kn/m
[(2.15 + 0 + 0.1 + 0.3 + 1.275 + 0.3/2)] x 10
2
= 39.75 Kn/m
A= Total load acting on the top of the slab = 23.9 + 7.5
2
= 31.4 Kn/m
B= Total load acting on the bottom of the slab = 47.207
2
= 47.207 Kn/m
2
= 12.75 Kn/m
D= Internal water pressure on bottom slab = 1.275x10
2
= 12.75 Kn/m
2
E= Total load acting on the top corner of the slab = 0 Kn/m
2
2
G= Hydrostatic water pressure at top = 24.00 Kn/m
2
H= Hydrostatic water pressure at bottom = 39.75 Kn/m
Case 2 : Box Empty and Canal Full
Depth of water in Pipe = 0m
Depth of water in Canal + free board = 2.15 m

2
= 0 Kn/m
Load acting on top of barrel due to Canal water = 2.15 x 10
2
= 21.5 Kn/m
2
= 2.4 Kn/m
2
Total load = 0 + 21.5 + 2.4 = 23.9 Kn/m
Load due to external side wall over the barrel = 0 Kn/m
= 23.9 Kn/m
2
= 7.5 Kn/m

2
= 0 Kn/m
= 1.875
= 1.875 m
2
Kaγh2 = 6.806 Kn/m

2
Max.external load acting on the top of barrel (soil ) = 23.9 Kn/m
= 5.1 m
= 121.89 Kn/m
2
= 1.53 m
2
= 1.53 m
2
= 0.765 m
2
= 0.3825 m
= 105.1875 Kn/m
= 7.56 Kn/m
D Load due to water inside box = 0
= 0 Kn/m

= 121.89 + 105.1875 + 7.56 + 0
= 234.638 Kn/m
= 46.007 Kn/m
= 46.007 - 0.3x25 - 0.075x24
2
= 36.707 Kn/m
Since the Safe bearing capacity (S.B.C.) of soil is more than the net upward pressure acting on bottom slab of
barrel, the design is SAFE
Vehicular load: No vehicle In canal Portion

Total load of both axels of Class 'A' wheeled vehicle as per = 0 KN
IRC - 6

[(2.15 + 0 + 0.1 + 0.3/2)] x 10
2
= 24.00 Kn/m
[(2.15 + 0 + 0.1 + 0.3 + 1.275 + 0.3/2)] x 10
2
= 39.75 Kn/m
2
= 31.4 Kn/m
2
= 36.707 Kn/m
2
= 0 Kn/m
D= Internal water pressure on bottom slab = 0
2
= 0.000 Kn/m
2
2
2
2
Case 3 : Box Full and Canal Empty
Depth of water in box = 1.275 m
Depth of water in canal + free board = 0m

2
= 0 Kn/m
2
= 0 Kn/m
2
= 2.4 Kn/m
2
Total load = 0 + 0 + 2.4 = 2.4 Kn/m
= 2.4 Kn/m
2
= 7.5 Kn/m

2
= 0 Kn/m
= 1.875
= 1.875 m
2
Kaγh2 = 12.994 Kn/m

2
= 5.1 m
= 12.24 Kn/m
2
= 1.53 m
2
= 1.53 m
2
= 0.765 m
2
= 0.3825 m
= 105.1875 Kn/m
= 7.56 Kn/m
D Load due to water inside box = 2.1 x 1.275 x 10x2
= 53.55 Kn/m

= 12.24 + 105.1875 + 7.56 + 53.55
= 178.538 Kn/m
= 35.007 Kn/m
= 35.007 - 0.3x25 - 0.075x24
2
= 25.707 Kn/m
Vehicular load:
IRC - 6

2
0= 0.00 Kn/m
2
0 = 0 Kn/m
2
= 9.9 Kn/m
2
= 25.707 Kn/m
2
= 12.75 Kn/m
D= Internal water pressure on bottom slab = (53.55)/4.2
2
= 12.750 Kn/m
2
2
2
2
H= Hydrostatic water pressure at bottom = 0 Kn/m
Case 4 : Box Empty and Canal Empty
Depth of water in Box = 0m
Depth of water in Canal + free board = 0m

2
= 0 Kn/m
2
= 0 Kn/m
2
= 2.4 Kn/m
2
Total load = 0 + 0 + 2.4 = 2.4 Kn/m
= 2.4 Kn/m
2
= 7.5 Kn/m

2
= 0 Kn/m
= 1.875
= 1.875 m
2
Kaγh2 = 12.994 Kn/m

2
= 5.1 m
= 12.24 Kn/m

2
= 1.53 m
2
= 1.53 m
2
= 0.765 m
2
= 0.3825 m
= 105.1875 Kn/m
= 7.56 Kn/m
D Load due to water inside Box = 0
= 0 Kn/m

= 12.24 + 105.1875 + 7.56 + 0
= 124.988 Kn/m
= 24.507 Kn/m
= 24.507 - 0.3x25 - 0.075x24
2
= 15.207 Kn/m
Vehicular load:
IRC - 6

2
0 = 0.00 Kn/m
2
0 = 0 Kn/m
2
= 9.9 Kn/m
2
= 15.207 Kn/m
2
= 0 Kn/m
D= Internal water pressure on bottom slab = 0
2
= 0.00 Kn/m
2
2
2
2
A
E E
C
D
F F
B
**********************STAAD INPUT*********************
1. STAAD SPACE UT AT KM 44.875-under canal

2. START JOB INFORMATION
3. ENGINEER DATE 3/26/2018
4. END JOB INFORMATION
5. INPUT WIDTH 79
6. UNIT METER MTON
7. JOINT COORDINATES
8. 1 0 0 0; 2 2.4 0 0; 3 2.4 1.575 0; 4 0 1.575 0; 5 4.80001 0 0
9. 6 4.80001 1.575 0
10. MEMBER INCIDENCES
11. 1 1 2; 2 2 3; 3 1 4; 4 4 3; 5 2 5; 6 5 6; 7 3 6
12. MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
13. 2 3 6 PRIS YD 0.3 ZD 1
14. MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
15. 1 4 5 7 PRIS YD 0.3 ZD 1
16. DEFINE MATERIAL START
17. ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
18. E 2.21466E+006
19. POISSON 0.17
20. DENSITY 2.4026
21. ALPHA 5.5E-006
22. DAMP 0.05
23. *TYPE CONCRETE
24. *STRENGTH FCU 2812.27
25. END DEFINE MATERIAL
26. CONSTANTS
27. MATERIAL CONCRETE ALL
28. SUPPORTS
29. 1 2 5 PINNED
30. LOAD 1 BOX EMPTY & CANAL EMPTY
31. MEMBER LOAD
32. 1 5 UNI GY 1.55
33. 4 7 UNI GY -1.009
34. 3 LIN Y -1.325 -0
35. 6 LIN Y 1.325 0
36. LOAD 2 BOX FULL & CANAL EMPTY
37. MEMBER LOAD
38. 1 5 UNI GY 2.62
39. 1 5 UNI GY -1.3
40. 4 7 UNI GY -1.009
41. 3 LIN Y -1.325 0
42. 3 LIN Y 1.3 0
43. 6 LIN Y 1.325 0
44. 6 LIN Y -1.3 0
45. LOAD 3 BOX EMPTY & CANAL FULL
46. MEMBER LOAD
47. 1 5 UNI GY 3.742
48. 4 7 UNI GY -3.201
49. 3 LIN Y -0.694 0
50. 3 LIN Y -4.052 -2.446
51. 6 LIN Y 0.694 0
52. 6 LIN Y 4.052 2.446
53. LOAD 4 BOX FULL & CANAL FULL
54. MEMBER LOAD
55. 1 5 UNI GY 4.812
56. 1 5 UNI GY -1.3
57. 4 7 UNI GY -3.201
58. 3 LIN Y -0.694 -0
59. 3 LIN Y -4.052 -2.446
60. 3 LIN Y 0.694 0
61. 6 LIN Y 0.694 0
62. 6 LIN Y 4.052 2.446
63. 6 LIN Y -1.3 0
64. PERFORM ANALYSIS
65.FINISH
DESIGN OF TOP SLAB
Design constants:
2
σcbc = 10 N/mm
2
σst = 130 N/mm
m = 9.333
k = 0.418
j = 0.861
Q = 1.799
2
σcbc = 10 N/mm
2
σst = 130 N/mm
m = 9.333
k = 0.418
j = 0.861
Q = 1.799
Top slab: at centre (for SAGGING BM)

Thickness of slab = 0.3 m = 300 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm
= 254 mm
Lever arm = 300/2
= 150 mm
= 0.15 m
= 3.507 Kn - m
Total moment = 9.035 + 3.507
= 12.542 Kn - m
= SQRT (12.542 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 83.496 mm < 254 mm
Hence SAFE
= 12.542 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 254
2
= 441.15 mm
Minimum Area of Steel = 0.35% x 1000 x (D/2)
= 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm

2
= 753.98 mm
2
= 0 mm
2 2
= 753.98 mm > 525 mm
HENCE SAFE
There fore area of steel provided at middle
+
Top slab: at support (for HOGGING)

Haunches = 0.15 m = 150 mm
As per Cl. No. 305.5 of IRC 21: 2000, when the haunches are provided the total depth of slab or beam may be
considered as depth of slab or beam assumed initially + size of haunches divided by 3.
= 300 + 150 / 3 = 350 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm
= 252 mm
Lever arm = 300/2
= 150 mm = 0.15 m
= 3.507 Kn - m
Total moment = 17.5 + 3.507
= 21.007 Kn - m
= SQRT (21.007 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 108.06 mm < 252 mm
Hence SAFE
= 21.007 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 252
2
= 744.761 mm
2
= 1005.31 mm
2
= 0 mm
50% of sagging steel are crancked on to the supports = 0.5 x 753.98
= 0
2 2
= 1005.31 mm > 744.761 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
Check for shear:

34.82 KN
1.296 m
X= 1.104 m
40.908 KN
2.4 m

= 1.296 m
Shear force at a distance of effective depth 'd' + half of the thickness of
support from centre line of the support
= 0.252 + 0.3/2
= 0.402 m
= 40.908 x (1.296 - 0.402) / 1.296

= 28.219 x 1000 / 1000 x 252
2
= 0.112 N/mm

= 100 x 1005.31 / 1000 x 252
= 0.399 %
2 2
= 0.278 N/mm > 0.112 N/mm

= 70056.000 N
= 70.056 KN
= 0 x 175 x 0.707
= 0.000 N
= 0.000 KN
= 70.056 > 28.219
HENCE SAFE
(as per is:3370 part-2) = 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm
2
DESIGN OF BOTTOM SLAB
Bottom slab: at centre (for SAGGING BM)

Clear cover = 40 mm
= 254 mm
Lever arm = 300/2
= 150 mm
= 0.15 m
= 0 Kn - m
= 10.122 Kn - m
= SQRT (10.122 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 75.01 mm < 254 mm
Hence SAFE

= 10.122 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 254
2
= 356.03 mm
= 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm

2
= 753.98 mm
2
= 0 mm
2 2
= 753.98 mm > 525 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
Bottom slab: at support (for HOGGING)
Haunches = 0.15 m = 150 mm
= 300 + 150 / 3 = 350 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm
Effective depthe proposed = 300 - 40 - 16 / 2 = 252 mm
Lever arm = 300/2
= 150 mm = 0.15 m
= 0 Kn - m
= 20.08 Kn - m
= SQRT (20.08 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 105.649 mm < 252 mm
Hence SAFE
= 20.08 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 252
2
= 711.896 mm
2
= 1005.31 mm
2
= 0 mm
50% of sagging steel are crancked on to the supports = 0.5 x 753.98
= 0
2 2
= 1005.31 mm > 711.896 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
Check for shear:
40.89 KN
1.286 m
X= 1.114 m
47.187 KN
2.4 m
= 1.286 m
= 0.252 + 0.3/2
= 0.402 m
= 47.187 x (1.286 - 0.402) / 1.286
= 32.436 x 1000 / 1000 x 252
2
= 0.129 N/mm
= 100 x 1005.31 / 1000 x 252
= 0.399 %
2 2
= 0.278 N/mm > 0.129 N/mm
= 70056.000 N
= 70.056 KN
= 0 x 175 x 0.707
= 0.000 N
= 0.000 KN
= 70.056 > 32.436
HENCE SAFE
Since the shear resisted by concrete & bent up bars are more than the required, Design of reinforcement from
shear criteria is not needed. HENCE O.K.
(as per is:3370 part-2) = 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm
2
DESIGN OF VERTICAL WALL
vertical wall: at centre (for SAGGING BM)

Clear cover = 40 mm
Moment = 1 Kn - m
= 254 mm
Lever arm = 300/2
= 150 mm
= 0.15 m
= 5.223 Kn - m
= 6.223 Kn - m
= SQRT (6.223 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 58.814 mm < 254 mm
Hence SAFE
= 6.223 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 254
2
= 218.887 mm

= 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm

2
= 753.98 mm
2
= 0 mm
2 2
= 753.98 mm > 525 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
End vertical wall: at support (for HOGGING)
= 300 + 300 / 3 = 400 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm
= 254 mm
Lever arm = 300/2
= 150 mm
= 0.15 m
= 5.223 Kn - m
Total moment = 12.52 + 5.223
= 17.743 Kn - m
= SQRT (17.743 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 99.311 mm < 254 mm
Hence SAFE
= 17.743 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 254
2
= 624.089 mm
2
= 753.98 mm
2
= 0 mm

2 2
= 753.98 mm > 624.089 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
Check for shear:
23.38 KN
0.912 m
X= 0.663 m
32.160 KN
1.575 m

= 0.912 m
= 0.254 + 0.3/2
= 0.404 m
= 32.16 x (0.912 - 0.404) / 0.912
= 17.914 x 1000 / 1000 x 254
2
= 0.071 N/mm
= 100 x 753.98 / 1000 x 254
= 0.297 %
2 2
= 0.245 N/mm > 0.071 N/mm
HENCE SAFE
Since the Permisible shear stress Tc is more than the Nominal shear stress Tv, Shear reinforcement is not needed,
and the section is SAFE from SHEAR criteria,
(as per is:3370 part-2) = 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm
2
DESIGN OF MIDDLE WALL
Midlle wall: at centre (for SAGGING BM)

Clear cover = 40 mm
Moment = 1 Kn - m
= 254 mm
Lever arm = 300/2
= 150 mm
= 0.15 m
= 12.156 Kn - m
= 13.156 Kn - m
= SQRT (13.156 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 85.516 mm < 254 mm
Hence SAFE
= 13.156 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 254
2
= 462.747 mm
2
= 753.98 mm
2
= 0 mm
2 2
= 753.98 mm > 462.747 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
Midlle wall: at support (for HOGGING)
= 300 + 300 / 3 = 400 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm
Moment = 1 Kn - m
= 254 mm
Lever arm = 300/2
= 150 mm
= 0.15 m
= 12.156 Kn - m
= 13.156 Kn - m
= SQRT (13.156 x 10^6 / 1.799 x 1000)
= 85.516 mm < 254 mm
Hence SAFE
= 13.156 x 10^6 / 130 x 0.861 x 254
2
= 462.747 mm
2
= 753.98 mm
2
= 0 mm

2 2
= 753.98 mm > 462.747 mm
HENCE SAFE
+
Check for shear:
0.60 KN
0.716 m
X= 0.859 m
0.500 KN
1.575 m

= 0.859 m
= 0.254 + 0.3/2
= 0.404 m
= 0.6 x (0.859 - 0.404) / 0.859
= 0.318 x 1000 / 1000 x 254
2
= 0.001 N/mm
= 100 x 753.98 / 1000 x 254
= 0.297 %
2 2
= 0.245 N/mm > 0.001 N/mm
HENCE SAFE
Since the Permisible shear stress Tc is more than the Nominal shear stress Tv, Shear reinforcement is not needed,
and the section is SAFE from SHEAR criteria,
(as per is:3370 part-2) = 0.35 x 1000x150 / 100
2
= 525 mm
2
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Job Title Ref
By Date3/26/2018 Chd
Client File UT+44.875+2v.STD Date/Time 19-Apr-2019 10:14
17.518 kN-m
Max: 17.109
Max: -0.494 kN-m

Max: -8.990 kN-m Max: -9.035 kN-m
Y
Z X
Max: 10.122 kN-m Max: 10.122 kN-m
Max: 12.519 kN-m Max: 0.599 kN-m Max: -12.519 kN-m

Load 0 : Bending Z
Moment - kN-m
Max: -20.081 kN-m
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Job Title Ref
Max: 34.819 kN Max: 40.550 kN

Max: -23.382 kN Max: 23.382 kN
Max: -40.908 kN Max: -34.819 kN
Max: 47.187 kN Max: 40.885 kN

Max: 32.160 kN Max: 0.694 kN Max: -32.160 kN
Max: -40.885 kN Max: -47.187 kN
Load 0 : Shear Y
Force - kN
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Job Title Ref
23.382 kN 23.382 kN 23.382 kN
34.819 kN 81.039 kN 34.819 kN
34.819 kN 0 kN 81.039 kN 0 kN 34.819 kN 0 kN
Load 3 : Axial Force

Force - kN
US WING WAL AT DROP & return
0.5 m
Top width = 0.500 m
Left side Offcet = 0.300 m W3
Right side off cet = 0.300 m
Thickness of foundation = 0.450 m W4
Height of wing wall = 4.371 m
Total bottom width of foundation = 2.900 m W1
Top level of wing wall = 541.144 4.371 m W2
Top of foundation = 536.773 m
Bottom of foundation = 536.323 m
Density of concrete = 2.4 T/m2
Density of soil = 2.1 T/m2
Kav = 0.0395 A W5
Kah = 0.1584 B
0.3 0.3
Pav = Kav γ H2 0.5 1.8 m
Pah = Kah γ H2 2.3 m
2.9 m
Taking moments about 'A'
Sl.No. Load Force Lever arm Moment

1 W1 0.5 x 4.371 x 2.4 5.245 0.25 1.311
2 W2 0.5 x 1.8 x 4.371 x2.4 9.441 1.1 10.385
3 W3 0.5 x 1.8 x 4.371 x 2.1 8.261 1.7 14.044
4 Pav 0.0395 x 2.1 x 4.371² 1.585 2.3 3.646
5 Pah 0.1584 x 2.1 x 4.371² 6.355 1.836 -11.668
17.718
Sum of Momemts M about 'B' = 17.718 T - m
Lever arm = ΣM / ΣV
= 17.718 / 24.532
= 0.722 m
Eccentricity = b/2 - lever arm

= 2.3 / 2 - 0.722
= 0.428 m
E Max. = 0.383 m
Stresses about 'A'

F  6e 
Max. stress = P 1 = 22.575 t/m
2
b  b 
Min stress = F  6e  = -1.243 t/m
2
P 1  b 
b  
Taking moments about 'B'

1 W1 0.5 x 4.371 x 2.4 5.245 0.55 2.885
2 W2 0.5 x 1.8 x 4.371 x2.4 9.441 1.4 13.217
3 W3 0.5 x 1.8 x 4.371 x 2.1 8.261 2 16.522
4 W4 0.3 x 4.371 x 2.1 2.754 2.75 7.574
5 W5 2.9 x 0.45 x 2.4 3.132 1.45 4.541
6 Pav 0.0395 x 2.1 x 4.821² 1.928 2.9 5.591
7 Pah 0.1584 x 2.1 x 4.821² 7.731 2.286 -17.673
32.657
= 32.657 / 30.761
= 1.062 m

= 2.9 / 2 - 1.062
= 0.388 m
E Max. = 0.483 m
Stresses about 'B'

F  6e 
Max. stress = P 1 = 19.122 t/m
2
b  b 
Min stress = F  6e  = 2.092 t/m
2
P 1  b 
b  

= 0.5 x 30.761 / 7.731
= 1.989 > 1.5
Hence SAFE

= 50.33 / 17.673
= 2.848 > 2
Hence SAFE
U.S. WING WALL - ( at U/s side )(at junction with barrel)
0.5 m
Top width = 0.500 m
Kav = 0.0395 A W5
Kah = 0.1584 B
0.3 0.3
Pav = Kav γ H2 0.5 1.1 m
2.2 m

1 W1 0.5 x 3.2 x 2.4 3.84 0.25 0.96
2 W2 0.5 x 1.1 x 3.2 x2.4 4.224 0.867 3.662
3 W3 0.5 x 1.1 x 3.2 x 2.1 3.696 1.233 4.557
4 Pav 0.0395 x 2.1 x 3.2² 0.849 1.6 1.358
5 Pah 0.1584 x 2.1 x 3.2² 3.406 1.344 -4.578
5.959
= 5.959 / 12.609
= 0.473 m

= 1.6 / 2 - 0.473
= 0.327 m
E Max. = 0.267 m
Stresses about 'A'

F  6e 
Max. stress = P 1 = 17.544 t/m
2
b  b 
Min stress = F  6e  = -1.783 t/m
2
P 1  b 
b  

1 W1 0.5 x 3.2 x 2.4 3.84 0.55 2.112
2 W2 0.5 x 1.1 x 3.2 x2.4 4.224 1.167 4.929
3 W3 0.5 x 1.1 x 3.2 x 2.1 3.696 1.533 5.666
4 W4 0.3 x 3.2 x 2.1 2.016 2.05 4.133
5 W5 2.2 x 0.45 x 2.4 2.376 1.1 2.614
6 Pav 0.0395 x 2.1 x 3.65² 1.105 2.2 2.431
7 Pah 0.1584 x 2.1 x 3.65² 4.432 1.794 -7.951
13.934
= 13.934 / 17.257
= 0.807 m

= 2.2 / 2 - 0.807
= 0.293 m
E Max. = 0.367 m
Stresses about 'B'

F  6e 
Max. stress = P 1 = 14.112 t/m
2
b  b 
Min stress = F  6e  = 1.576 t/m
2
P 1  b 
b  

= 0.5 x 17.257 / 4.432
= 1.947 > 1.5
Hence SAFE

= 21.885 / 7.951
= 2.752 > 2
Hence SAFE
D.S. WING WALL -(at junction with barrel)
0.5 m
Top width = 0.500 m
Kav = 0.0395 m A W5
Kah = 0.1584 B
0.3 0.3
Pav = Kav γ H2 0.5 1.1 m
2.2 m

1 W1 0.5 x 3.075 x 2.4 3.69 0.25 0.923
2 W2 0.5 x 1.1 x 3.075 x2.4 4.059 0.867 3.519
3 W3 0.5 x 1.1 x 3.075 x 2.1 3.552 1.233 4.38
4 Pav 0.0395 x 2.1 x 3.075² 0.784 1.6 1.254
5 Pah 0.1584 x 2.1 x 3.075² 3.145 1.292 -4.063
6.013
= 6.013 / 12.085
= 0.498 m

= 1.6 / 2 - 0.498
= 0.302 m
E Max. = 0.267 m
Stresses about 'A'

F  6e 
Max. stress = P 1 = 16.107 t/m
2
b  b 
Min stress = F  6e  = -1.001 t/m
2
P 1  b 
b  

1 W1 0.5 x 3.075 x 2.4 3.69 0.55 2.03
2 W2 0.5 x 1.1 x 3.075 x2.4 4.059 1.167 4.737
3 W3 0.5 x 1.1 x 3.075 x 2.1 3.552 1.533 5.445
4 W4 0.3 x 3.075 x 2.1 1.937 2.05 3.971
5 W5 2.2 x 0.45 x 2.4 2.376 1.1 2.614
6 Pav 0.0395 x 2.1 x 3.525² 1.031 2.2 2.268
7 Pah 0.1584 x 2.1 x 3.525² 4.133 1.742 -7.2
13.865
= 13.865 / 16.645
= 0.833 m

= 2.2 / 2 - 0.833
= 0.267 m
E Max. = 0.367 m
Stresses about 'B'

F  6e 
Max. stress = P 1 = 13.075 t/m
2
b  b 
Min stress = F  6e  = 2.057 t/m
2
P 1  b 
b  

= 0.5 x 16.645 / 4.133
= 2.014 > 1.5
Hence SAFE

= 21.065 / 7.2
= 2.926 > 2
Hence SAFE
D.S WING WALL(MINIMUM) and RETURN
0.5 m
Top width = 0.500 m
Kav = 0.0395 A W5
Kah = 0.1584 B
0.3 0.3
Pav = Kav γ H2 0.5 0.8 m
1.9 m

1 W1 0.5 x 2.602 x 2.4 3.122 0.25 0.781
2 W2 0.5 x 0.8 x 2.602 x2.4 2.498 0.767 1.916
3 W3 0.5 x 0.8 x 2.602 x 2.1 2.186 1.033 2.258
4 Pav 0.0395 x 2.1 x 2.602² 0.562 1.3 0.731
5 Pah 0.1584 x 2.1 x 2.602² 2.252 1.093 -2.461
3.225
= 3.225 / 8.368
= 0.385 m

= 1.3 / 2 - 0.385
= 0.265 m
E Max. = 0.217 m
Stresses about 'A'

F  6e 
Max. stress = P 1 = 14.310 t/m
2
b  b 
Min stress = F  6e  = -1.436 t/m
2
P 1  b 
b  

1 W1 0.5 x 2.602 x 2.4 3.122 0.55 1.717
2 W2 0.5 x 0.8 x 2.602 x2.4 2.498 1.067 2.665
3 W3 0.5 x 0.8 x 2.602 x 2.1 2.186 1.333 2.914
4 W4 0.3 x 2.602 x 2.1 1.639 1.75 2.868
5 W5 1.9 x 0.45 x 2.4 2.052 0.95 1.949
6 Pav 0.0395 x 2.1 x 3.052² 0.773 1.9 1.469
7 Pah 0.1584 x 2.1 x 3.052² 3.098 1.543 -4.78
8.802
= 8.802 / 12.27
= 0.717 m

= 1.9 / 2 - 0.717
= 0.233 m
E Max. = 0.317 m
Stresses about 'B'

F  6e 
Max. stress = P 1 = 11.21 t/m
2
b  b 
Min stress = F  6e  = 1.706 t/m
2
P 1  b 
b  

= 0.5 x 12.27 / 3.098
= 1.98 > 1.5
Hence SAFE

= 13.582 / 4.78
= 2.841 > 2
Hence SAFE

1.design of UT at KM 44.875 PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

1.design of UT at KM 44.875 PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

UPPER PENNAR PROJECT

NAME OF WORK: - Lifting of water from Jeedipalli Reservoir to Feed

DESIGN OF UNDER TUNNEL AT KM 44.875

HYDRAULIC PARTICULARS OF CANAL AT km 44.875

1) U/S & D/S Head wall 5.376 2.696 - -

4) DS WING WALL(junction with barrel) 16.107 -1.001 13.075 2.057

6) R.C.C BOX UNDER EARTH BANK - - 7.706 -

Barrel: The barrel is analyzed for the following case:

Hydraulic particulars of Canal:

Max. Flood Discharge 'Q' = 1400 x 0.28^ 3/4

Top slab thickness = 0.3 m

Top level of barrel top slab = 538.573 - 0 - 0.1

Bed level in the barrel = 538.173 - 1.2

Top level of barrel bottom slab = 536.973 - 0.075

Bottom level of barrel bottom slab = 536.898 - 0.3

Canal lining 0 m and sealing coat of 0.1 m over barrel

2 vents of 2.1 x 1.2 m 1.2 m

Stream B.L.536.973 536.898

Wearing coat inside barrel 0.075 m thick

Calculaton of bed fall of vagu:

Bed level on U/S of vagu at Km. 350 543.432

Bed level on U/S of vagu at Km. 250 542.144

Bed level on U/S of vagu at Km. 150 541.571

Bed level on U/S of vagu at Km. 75 540.270

Average bed fall = 580.263 / 5

TOTAL DISCHARGE ( Q ) = 15.259 cumecs

MFL calculations at confluence point (i.e., C/C 0.0 m )

-25 540.324 540.010 0.000

50.000 0.431 41.484 10.485

SURFACE FALL ( S ) = 0.008617

Stream discharge = 15.259 Cumecs

Lacey's regime wetted perimeter (LRWP) = 4.8 √Q

Bed width = 11.3 m

Area (B + SD) D = (11.3 + 1.5 x 1.5) x 1.5

There fore valocity as per mannings = 1/ n x R2/3 x S1/2

There fore discharge Q = A V = 20.325 x 0.77

12.3 4.5 Stream flow 11.3

7.800 23.45 10.20

Flow condition at section 1-1

Flow condition at section 3-3

Head loss calcuations inside barrel (using UNWIN's formulae)

Flow condition at section 4-4

M.F.L. at section 5 - 5 i.e., D/S side of the drop = 539.241 m

Crest level of the drop = 539.798 m

Discharge over the drop under drowned weir condition:

Discharge over the drop under free weir condition:

Depth of flow over weir i.e., at section 6 - 6 = 0.81 + 0

Total drop height H = 539.798 - 536.973

Top width of drop = Depth of flow over weir / SQRT(γ)

Thickness of apron t = 0.55 x SQRT(d+ h)

2.825 1st DROP

Maximum flood diacharge of stream = 15.259 Cumecs

Maximum scour depth on U / S side = 1.5 x R

MFL on up stream side from from TEL's = 540.644 m

Up stream cut off level = 540.644 - 1.856

Down stream side:

Maximum flood diacharge of stream = 15.259 Cumecs

Maximum scour depth on D / S = 2.0 x R

MFL on down stream side from from TEL's = 538.473 m

Down stream cut off level = 538.473 - 2.618

Top width = 0.500 m