Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Regin VI - Western Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF GUIMARAS
San Miguel, Jordan, Guimaras
Telefax (033) 581-2158

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FOR

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
School/District: Date of Planning and Commitme
Rating Period: Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING
Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7
7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other
MOV given

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action
conduct and application disseminated action research with
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of
7.5% of the given MOV the acceptable
MOV

Timeliness Presented the Completed the

research report research report
within the rating within the rating
period period

Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated

Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategiesPerformance
to Indica
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
MFOs KRAs Objectives
creative thinking, as well
Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
QET
as other higher-order (5)
well as other well as other (4)
Satisfactory
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3

more lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality
Services Environment and colleagues to model and
Diversity of share effective Modeled and Modeled and
Learners techniques in the shared effective shared effective
management of classroom classroom
classroom structure to management management
engage learners, strategies that strategies that
individually or in groups, engage learners in engage learners in
in meaningful activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
exploration, discovery done in different done in different
and hands-on activities physical learning physical learning
within a range of 7.5% environments as environments as
physical learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
environments.environm with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
ents. Efficiency Submitted 3
lessons supported
Submitted at least 4 by MOV 1 and any
lessons supported 1 of the other
by MOV 1 and any acceptable MOV
1 of the other
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills
positive and by applying positive by applying positive
non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments. environments environments
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of

the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3
least 4 lessons lessons
 Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the
differentiated, in the department or
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
learners’ differences in Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
7.5%
gender, needs, lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
strengths, interests and shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
experiences. and supported by and supported by
any acceptable any acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning process as learning process as
and learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
to meet curriculum with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
requirements and varied
teaching contexts.
7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3
lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3

collaborative collaborative
7.5%
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV
 Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3
collaborative collaborative
7.5%
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently Performance
shown in Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight MOVOutstanding
1 and MOV 1 Very
and
QET
supported(5)by any 1 supported by any
Satisfactory (4)1
of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the
selection, organization, in the selection, selection,
development and use of organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3

teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies 7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
consistent with
assessment tools assessment tools
curriculum
as evidently shown as evidently shown
requirements.
in any of the in any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data assessment data
support learner as shown in the as shown in the
progress and 7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted
achievement.
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3
different types of of the same kind of
MOV MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently Frequently applied
Services effective communication applied skills in the skills in the
of learner needs, effective effective
progress and communication of communication of
achievement to key learner needs and learner needs and
stakeholders, including progress to progress to
parents/guardians. parents/ guardians parents/ guardians
7.5% as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3

of the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently
Services related works/activities performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
submitted submitted
10%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3

different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory 0
below 1.499 Poor Ratee
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
egin VI - Western Visayas
OLS DIVISION OF GUIMARAS
n Miguel, Jordan, Guimaras
Telefax (033) 581-2158

ENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Date of Planning and Commitment:

NNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable 0.000 0.000
Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was
applications of applications of shown
content knowledge content knowledge
within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 6 of 5
Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown
1 from colleagues colleagues and
and supported by supported by any 1
any 1 of the other of the other MOV
MOV given given

Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable 0.000 0.000

research with research with evidence was
colleagues colleagues shown

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV MOV evidence was
shown

Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable

research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating shown
period period

Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable 0.000 0.000

effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
well as other well as other
higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
 Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable 0.000 0.000
effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
strategies
Performance to
Indicators strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3)
well as other (2)
well as other (1) Q E T
higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

lessons as as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in in MOV 1 and shown
MOV 1 and supported by any of
supported by any 1 the other MOV
of the other MOV given
given

No acceptable 0.000 0.000

evidence was
Modeled and Modeled and shown
shared effective shared effective
classroom classroom
management management
strategies that strategies that
engage learners in engage learners in
activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
done in different done in different
physical learning physical learning
environments as environments as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons supported supported by any of evidence was
by MOV 1 and any the acceptable shown
1 of the other MOV
acceptable MOV

Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable 0.000 0.000

and constructive and constructive evidence was
behavior behavior shown
management skills management skills
by applying positive by applying positive
and non-violent and non-violent
discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable

the given strategies given strategies as evidence was
as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown
lessons lesson
Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T

Worked with Worked with No acceptable 0.000 0.000

colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown
with others with others

Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable

lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was
shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown
and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no
any acceptable evidence of sharing
MOV with others

Developed and Developed and No acceptable 0.000 0.000

applied effective applied effective evidence was
strategies showing strategies showing shown
developmentally- developmentally-
sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the other
acceptable MOV

Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable 0.000 0.000

collaborative collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidenced by the evidenced by the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher of teacher and shown
and learner learner feedback as
feedback as evidently shown in
evidently shown in any of the
MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV
 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher of teacher and shown
and learner learner feedback as
feedback as evidently shown in
Performance Indicators
evidently shown in any of the Rating
MOVSatisfactory
1 and Unsatisfactory
acceptable MOV Poor Actual Results Ave Score
supported (3)by any 1 (2) (1) Q E T
of the acceptable
MOV

Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 0.000 0.000

advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
in the selection, selection, shown
organization, organization,
development and development and
appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resource shown
as evidenced by at as evidenced by
least 1 of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable 0.000 0.000

reviewed collaboratively evidence was
collaboratively assessment tools shown
assessment tools with colleagues as
with colleagues as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
in any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable 0.000 0.000

collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
colleagues in the the interpretation of shown
interpretation of assessment data
assessment data as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

of the same kind of the MOV evidence was
MOV shown
Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable 0.000 0.000
applied skills in the in the effective evidence was
effective communication of shown
communication of learner needs and
learner needs and progress to
progress to parents/ guardians
parents/ guardians as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1

MOV MOV

Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable 0.000 0.000

performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
tasks and/or assignments as shown
assignments as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted

Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Poor 0.000

0 NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VI - Western Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF GUIMARAS
San Miguel, Jordan, Guimaras
Telefax (033) 581-2158
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (I
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teache

Name of Employee: 0 Name of Rater:

Position: 0 Position:
School/District: 0 Date of Review:
Rating Period: 0

Weight per Weight per Numeric

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective
Q E
Objective 1 7.5% 0 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0 0

0 0
Ratee Rater
 he Philippines
of Education
Western Visayas
ON OF GUIMARAS
ordan, Guimaras
3) 581-2158
MENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
V (Highly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater: 0
0
Date of Review: 0

Numerical Ratings
Score
T Ave
0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
Final Rating 0
Adjectival Rating Poor

0 NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority