Sei sulla pagina 1di 5

Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.43.496.92 on 1 February 1967. Downloaded from http://pmj.bmj.com/ on 12 November 2018 by guest.

Protected
Postgrad. med. J. (February 1967) 43, 92-96.

'Unstable lie in pregnancy and in labour


G. BANCROFT-LIVINGSTON H. GORDON*
M.D., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.O.G. F.R.C.S.(E), M.R.C.O.G.
Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist Registrar
Luton and Hitchin Group of Hospitals

'When we are called to see a case of this Fifty-three cases presented as transverse lie after
kind it is better not to give an opinion, nor the 36th week and then underwent spontaneous
to attempt to deliver the patient im- correction (three out of these fifty-three cases sub-
mediately, but to deliberate upon it and sequently underwent caesarean section for foetal
then make a second examination.' distress).
THOMAS DENMAN 1783. Aetiology
In fifty-eight women (54-5%) there was no
IT IS perhaps surprising that late in pregnancy and obvious cause for the abnormal lie (Table 2). (Six
in labour only the occasional foetus presents other of these fifty-eight cases were, however, grand
than as a longitudinal lie. In mid-pregnancy, multiparae, sixteen had had a previous caesarean
transverse and oblique lies occur relatively fre- section and one had had a previous transverse lie.)
quently, but the majority correct themselves Perhaps the most interesting aetiological factor
spontaneously before term. The cases to be dis- in the series here reported is the high incidence of

by copyright.
cussed in this paper are those in which the long placenta praevia. In twenty-seven patients (25 5%)
axis of the foetus lies obliquely or transversely placenta praevia was considered to be the primary
near term or when labour has begun.
cause of the unstable lie (Table 3). Nine of the
Incidence patients did not bleed before the onset of labour.
In the 3-year period 1962-64, 9495 patients were Pelvic tumours, most commonly cervical
delivered in the two Maternity Hospitals of the fibroids, may displace the foetal head from the
Group. One hundred and six cases of transverse pelvic cavity and thereby contribute to the
and oblique lie at full term or in labour were
encountered, an incidence of one in eighty-nine TABLE 2
pregnancies. The total foetal loss was fourteen Aetiology of unstable lie
and there was one maternal death. A further Total number of cases 106
fifty-three cases of unstable lie were encountered Placenta praevia 27 (25-5%)
earlier in pregnancy, but underwent correction Fibroids 5 (4-7%)
TABLE 1 Disproportion 5 (4-7%)
Incidence of unstable lie
Prematurity 3 (2-8%)
Others 5 (4*7%)
Total number of hospital deliveries 9495 Aetiology unknown 58 (54-51%)
Transverse and oblique lie in labour and
at delivery 106 TABLE 3
Total foetal loss 14 Placenta praevia and unstable lie
Maternal deaths 1
Transverse and oblique lie in labour or at
before term. There seems therefore to be one delivery 106
chance in three than an unstable lie encountered Associated placenta praevia (two
cases of placenta accreta, one
during the latter part of pregnancy will undergo case of cervical incompetence
spontaneous correction before term and the onset and cervical suture) 27 (25-5 )
of labour (Table 1). Bleeding occurred before term 9
Bleeding at or after term 9
*Present address: Department of Obstetrics and No ante-partum bleeding 9 (33%)
Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital.
Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.43.496.92 on 1 February 1967. Downloaded from http://pmj.bmj.com/ on 12 November 2018 by guest. Protected
Unstable lie in pregnancy and in labour 93
TABLE 4 Emergency admissions
Unstable lie in primigravidae One of the most surprising features of this series
of 106 patients was the large number of emergency
Transverse and oblique lie in labour or at admissions with unstable lie, thirty-nine in all
delivery 106 (37%). This high figure reflects the low rate of
Primigravidae 14 (13-2%) booking in the two Maternity Hospitals concerned
Fibroids 4 in this report; however eleven of these thirty-nine
Prematurity I emergency admissions had clear-out indications
Disproportion I for hospital confinement at the onset of preg-
Placenta praevia I nancy, which represents a lapse in the established
Asymmetrical pelvis I principles of ante-natal care, and it is fortunate
Unknown aetiology (? disproportion) 6 that the foetal loss was no higher than it was
Caesarean section 11 (Table 5).
Internal version 3 Twenty-three of the thirty-nine emergency
Foetal loss (both neo-natal deaths from admissions underwent caesarean section but it
prematurity) 2 must also be noted that ten underwent delivery by
internal version, a high figure in such a restricted
series. It was found possible to correct six cases
TABLE 5 by external version early in labour.
Emergency admissions and unstable lie
Transverse and oblique lie in labour TABLE 6
and at delivery 106 Treatment of unstable lie
Emergency admissions 39 (337%) Transverse and oblique lie in labour
Previous caesarean sections 3 and at delivery 106

by copyright.
Elderly patients 5 Caesarean section 76
Bad obstetric history 2 Foetal loss 7 (9-2%)
Grande multipara 1 Internal version 19
Total unsuitable for booking for Foetal loss (one foetal heart
domiciliary confinement I 11 (28%) not heard: three grossly
Treatment: premature) 5 (26-6%)
Caesarean section 223 External version 10
Internal version 110 Foetal loss (macerated foetus) 1 (10%)
External version 6 Spontaneous evolution (foetal
Foetal loss (includes two grossly and maternal death) I
premature and one abnormal
foetus) 5 (12-8%) TABLE 7
Caesarean section and unstable lie
aetiology of unstable lie. These tumours were
encountered in five instances in the present series Transverse and oblique lie in labour
(4-7%) an almost identical figure being reported or at delivery 106
by Hall & O'Brien (1961). Caesarean section 76
The association of prematurity with unstable lie Placenta praevia 27
is well recognized. Prematurity by itself, however, Previous caesarean section 15
can hardly be considered a cause of transverse lie,
'Obstetric history', etc. 17
although it was thought to play a part in three Fibroids 5
cases in the series here reported (2-8%).
Failed version 3
The role played by 'disproportion' in causing Uterine abnormality 3
the unstable lie is perhaps the most difficult to Foetal distress 3
assess. Five women in the present series (4-7%)
Disproportion 2
were considered to have an unstable presentation
Pelvic abnormality 1
because of cephalo-pelvic disproportion, a figure Total 76
in sharp contrast to the 20-9% reported by Aschan
& Kinnunen (1954, 1955). Treatment
An unstable lie has been regarded traditionally The treatment of a persistently unstable lie
as having sinister significance in primigravidae involves a choice between delivery by caesarean
(Table 4). section and vaginal delivery following internal
Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.43.496.92 on 1 February 1967. Downloaded from http://pmj.bmj.com/ on 12 November 2018 by guest. Protected
94 G. Bancroft-Livingston and H. Gordon
TABLE 8 the disturbance caused to the foetal heart rate if
Foetal loss in internal version for unstable lie the head is pushed onto the low-lying placenta.
Thompson (1964) reported an incidence of
Weight Booked/Emergency placenta praevia of 8-7% in 127 cases of trans-
1. 3 lb 7 oz Neo-natal death B verse lie.
2. 2 lb 9 oz Neo-natal death E Barter et al. (1955) saw two cases of unstable
3. 3 lb 12 oz Stillbirth B lie and pelvic tumour in their series of 107 cases
4. 8 lb Neo-natal death E and Eastman (1932) two in ninety-three cases.
5. 6 lb 9 oz Stillbirth B The association of a pelvic tumour with preg-
nancy occurs with sufficient frequency for it to
be borne in mind, and may be a factor in favour
version (Table 6). Seventy-six patients (72%) of carrying out vaginal pelvic assessment in all
underwent caesarean section with a foetal loss of cases early in pregnancy.
seven (9-2%). The indications for caesarean sec- The association of prematurity with both
tion in transverse lie are set out in Table 7. hydramnios and uterine abnormality must not be
Nineteen patients were treated by internal ver- forgotten and in Ballas' (1957) series of fifty cases,
sion with a foetal loss of five. In one the foetal 34% were classed as due to prematurity.
heart was not heard on admission and three of Hall & O'Brien (1966) attributed 11-% of their
the babies were grossly premature (Table 8). cases of unstable lie to contracted pelvis, and
Ten patients were treated by external version Eastman (1932) described eight cases of abnor-
with one foetal loss, a macerated foetus. One case mally large foetus supposedly causing unstable lie.
ended in spontaneous evolution of a premature It is impossible accurately to assess the place of
foetus and both the foetus and the mother were disproportion in the aetiology of transverse lie,
lost. Rupture of the uterus was diagnosed and but especially in primigravidae its importance
shortly after delivery a hysterectomy carried out. must be borne in mind. In certain European series

by copyright.
The patient never regained consciousness and the relatively high incidence of transverse lie has
died 15 hr after the operation. Post-mortem been ascribed to the high incidence of contracted
showed necrosis of the lower uterine segment with pelvis.
both retro- and intra-peritoneal haemorrhage. In the patient who presents at or near term with
a persistently unstable lie, a postero-anterior
Discussion abdominal radiograph to exclude foetal abnor-
The incidence of transverse lie will vary with mality is a wise precaution, and in the case of a
the inclusion of cases of premature labour and of primigravida a standing lateral view of the pelvic
twins, but it remains difficult to explain the very inlet and cavity should also be taken. The number
high incidence of unstable lie in the present series. of abnormal babies is unlikely to be high, but
It is perhaps tempting to suggest that in some way much anxiety and distress may be avoided by
it reflects the standard of ante-natal care. radiological assessment. Thompson (1964) en-
The high incidence of unexplained cases is one countered three abnormal babies in his cases, but
shared with many of the reported series. In in the series under discussion out of fourteen
Eastman's (1932) classic series only seven out of foetuses lost, only one was abnormal (hydro-
ninety-three cases were classified as 'aetiology un- cephaly).
known', but in a further six cases previous surgical In patients in whom an unstable lie persists
uterine suspension was mentioned as the main or recurs repeatedly, the problem arises of man-
aetiological factor. agement before the onset of labour. Repeated
Barter and his colleagues (Barter, Maciulla & attempts at external version should be made,
Soyster, 1955) encountered twenty-three cases of bearing in mind the possibility of placenta praevia.
placenta praevia in a series of 107 cases of un- The more difficult problem to settle is whether
stable lie. Stallworthy (1961) has drawn attention admission to hospital before the onset of labour
to the association of placenta praevia with is either necessary or wise. The figures for emer-
unstable lie and emphasized the importance of gency admissions in the present series suggest that
making the diagnosis in the ante-natal clinic. admission may safely be delayed until late in
Bleeding during the ante-natal period is not essen- pregnancy, although this may be contrary to
tial to the diagnosis of placenta praevia. In Stall- accepted obstetric teaching. The risk of allowing
worthy's experience, 20% of cases of placenta a patient with an unstable lie to await the onset of
praevia were associated with an unstable lie. He labour at home appears to be small, providing
also emphasized the importance of the forwardly the presence of an undeclared placenta praevia
displaced head in posterior placenta praevia and has been excluded. Neely (1964) advocates admis-
Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.43.496.92 on 1 February 1967. Downloaded from http://pmj.bmj.com/ on 12 November 2018 by guest. Protected
Unstable lie in pregnancy and in labour 95
sion of the patient to hospital at term, there to not heard when the patient was admitted as an emer-
await the spontaneous onset of labour. The cervix gency and internal version was performed without
may well remain 'unripe' for the very reason that difficulty. Classical obstetric teaching since the
the foetus is transverse (Gibson, 1964), and time of von Braun has dictated that caesarean
attempts to induce labour surgically may end in section should not be carried out if the foetus is
disaster. There seems to be little indication for dead, but many modern authorities point out that
surgical rupture of the membranes at term to help careful consideration should be given to the choice
stabilize an unstable lie and to induce labour, as between section or a destructive operation if the
even after correction the abnormal presentation foetus is dead. There is no doubt that decapitation
may recur and the possibility of prolapse of the and subsequent extraction of a dead foetus pre-
cord is an ever-present danger. Thompson (1964) senting as a shoulder may be an easy operation
found that the abnormal presentation recurred in but few modern obstetricians have either the skill
five patients after surgical rupture of the mem- or the courage to carry out a difficult destructive
branes; surgical induction does little or nothing operation, and in many hands caesarean section
to stabilize the presentation or reduce the risk of may be a far less tiraumatic procedure for the
cord prolapse. mother.
Hall & O'Brien (1961) pointed out that although In the majority of cases where there are intact
the caesarean section rate has risen in many re- membranes or at least a degree of foetal mobility
ported series from 50% to 90% over the past 25 present, a lower segment operation is undoubtedly
years, the foetal survival rate has not improved the operation of choice, but where the liquor has
in keeping with these figures. drained away, the uterus moulded round the
The cause of foetal instability must be sought foetus and the lower segment poorly formed, the
before the onset of labour and appropriate treat- classical operation offers many advantages and is
ment instituted, and it is likely that in the pre- always preferable to a lower segment incision
sence of a living foetus of moderate size the best through which the foetus cannot be delivered and
interests of both mother and baby will be served has, therefore, to be converted into a T-shaped

by copyright.
by caesarean section. Caesarean section will pro- incision (Rochat, 1954). If the classical section
bably be the chosen method of delivery under the scar has been blamed for subsequent uterine rup-
following circumstances of unstable lie: ture, there is no doubt that the T-shaped uterine
(1) Primigravidae. incision presents an even greater hazard in a sub-
(2) Multigravidae with dystocia. sequent pregnancy.
(3) Placenta praevia. For optimum foetal survival internal version
(4) Prolapse of cord. and extraction is best reserved for the following
(5) Cervix not dilated. circumstances:
(6) Uterine malformation. (a) Cases with a good obstetric history.
(7) Premature rupture of membranes. (b) A moderate sized foetus.
Dennis (1957) states 'The management of trans- (c) Where the foetus is alive, the cervix should
verse lie presents very little difficulty in deciding be sufficiently dilated for delivery to be effected
the method of delivery'. Vaginal delivery of this almost immediately after the internal version.
complication dictates a foetal mortality of 30% Foetal survival figures for internal version are
in those infants having foetal heart tones on weighted because this group contains most of the
admission. If the membranes rupture before or at cases where the foetus is already dead before treat-
the onset of labour, the foetal mortality rises to ment is undertaken, or where there is gross foetal
60%. Mangone & Kane (1955) advocate caesarean abnormality.
section unless the baby is dead or the cervix The operation of internal version and extraction
already fully dilated; they further believe that the carries a considerable maternal hazard. The risk
policy of 'watchful expectancy' advocated by is that of uterine rupture, but Posner, Tychowsky
some carries a foetal mortality of at least 50%. & Posner (1962) do not consider this risk to be
Winkler & Cangello (1960), however, do not great. In Dugger's (1954) series of 105 cases of
consider that 'uncomplicated' transverse lie is an uterine rupture, however, internal podalic version
absolute indication for caesarean section. In the accounted for thirty out of seventy-one cases of
present series, nineteen cases were dealt with by uterine rupture of tramatic origin, and Krishna
internal version and five babies were lost (26-6%). Menon (1962) reported seven cases due to internal
These five cases included one in which the foetal podalic version in a series of 164 cases of uterine
heart rate was not heard on admission, and three rupture. Internal podalic version in labour carries,
grossly premature infants. Of the two cases that therefore, a definite risk of traumatic rupture.
were not premature, in one the foetal heart was From Northern Ireland, Bancroft-Livingston &
Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.43.496.92 on 1 February 1967. Downloaded from http://pmj.bmj.com/ on 12 November 2018 by guest. Protected
96 G. Bancroft-Livingston and H. Gordon
Myles (1958) reported eleven cases of rupture due and who bore the brunt of the responsibility for
to this cause in a series of sixty-seven ruptured treatment in several of the cases.
uteri occurring during an 11-year period. To the Midwifery and Nursing Staff must go much
of the credit for the fact that under often difficult and
Summary harassing circumstances the results are as good as
they are.
A series of 106 cases of unstable lie in late
pregnancy and in labour is presented, collected References
from 9495 deliveries carried out in two Maternity ASCHAN, E. & KINNUNEN, 0. (1954) Transverse pre-
Hospitals dealing with a high rate of abnormal sentation (A study of 265 Finnish women). Ann.
obstetric admissions. Chir. Gynaec. Fenn. 43, 159.
In fifty-eight (54-55%) of these the cause of the ASCHAN, E. & KINNUNEN, 0. (1955) Transverse pre-
sentation (A study of 225 Finnish women). Ann.
abnormal lie was unknown, but attention is drawn Chir. Gynaec. Fenn. 44, 48.
to the large number of cases of placenta praevia BALLAS, R. (1957) Situacion transversal del feto. Sem.
seen in association with transverse lie, and the med. (B. Aires), 111, 441.
possibility that haemorrhage may not occur until BANCROFT-LIVINGSTON, G. & MYLES, T.J.M. (1958)
Uterine rupture in late pregnancy and labour.
labour starts is stressed. Irish J. med. Sci. 6th series, 81.
Seventy-six patients (72%) underwent caesarean BARTER, R.H., MACIULLA, L. & SoysTER, P. (1955)
section and seven babies were lost. The reasons Transverse presentation. 5th. med. J. (Bgham, Ala.),
for these losses are discussed and the possible 48, 1150.
COLE, J.T. & DELANY, F. (1946) Transverse presenta-
indications for caesarean section mentioned. Not tion. Surg. Gynaec. Obstet. 83, 473.
all cases should be dealt with by the lower seg- DENNIS, E.J. (1957) Premature rupture of membranes
ment operation; the indications for the classical and transverse lie. J. S.C. med. Ass. 53, 468.
incision are discussed and the danger of a DUGGER, J.H. (1945) Ruptured uterus in the last
trimester of pregnancy. Surg. Clini. N. Amer. 36,
T-shaped incision stressed. Radiological examina- 1414.
tion should be carried out before embarking on a EASTMAN, N.J. (1932) Transverse presentation. Amer.
caesarean section because of the possibility of an J. Obstet. Gynec. 24, 40.
GIBSON, G.B. (1964) Proceedings of Ulster Obstetric

by copyright.
abnormal foetus. and Gynaecological Society.
Nineteen cases in the present series were dealt HALL, S.C. & O'BRIEN, F.B. (1961) Review of trans-
with by internal version and five babies were lost. verse lie at the Methodist Hospital Brooklyn 1924-
The causes of these losses are discussed. The risk 1958. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 82, 1180.
of uterine rupture during internal manipulation is KRAMER, T.F. & SKALLEY, T.W. (1960) Transverse fetal
presentation. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 80, 291.
stressed and this further emphasizes the need for KRISHNA MENON, M.K. (1962) Rupture of the uterus.
careful selection of cases for internal version. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Cwlth, 64, 18.
The relatively large number of emergency MANGONE, E. & KANE, W.M. (1955) Persistent trans-
admissions in the present series is commented verse presentation of the fetus. Amer. J. Obstet.
Gynec. 69, 742.
upon and attention drawn to the incidence of un- NEELY, M.R. (1964) Proceedings Ulster Obstetric and
suitable cases booked for home confinement. In Gynaecological Society.
spite of this lapse in ante-natal care, the figures are POSNER, L.B., TYCHOWSKY, E. & POSNER, A.C. (1962)
better than might be expected and the policy of The transverse lie. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 83, 225.
managing cases of unstable lie by prolonged super- ROCHAT, R.L. (1954) Position transverse n6gligee. Bull.
Fed. Soc. Gynec. Obstet. Franq. 6, 578.
vision in hospital is challenged. The wisdom of STALLWORTHY, J. (1961) Proceedings of South Western
attempting to stabilize the foetal lie and induce Obstetrical and Gynaecological Society.
labour by artificial rupture of the membranes is THOMPSON, T.A. (1964) Communication to Ulster
questioned. Obstetric and Gynaecological Society.
TkoRNToN, W.N. (1960) The management of transverse
presentation. Clin. Obstet. Gynaec. 3, 39.
Acknowledgments WINKLER, E.G. & CANGELLO, V.W. (1960) Transverse
Our thanks are due to our Consultant colleagues, presentation; management by vaginal delivery.
D. W. James and G. C. Brentnall, who allowed us Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 78,1096.
access to their cases, and provided constant and WOOD, E.C. & FOSTER, F.M.C. (1959) Oblique and
stimulating comment and criticism. We thank the transverse foetal lie. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Cwlth,
numerous residents who helped us administratively 66, 75.

Potrebbero piacerti anche