Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
5DSLG$IIRUGDEOH0DVV+RXVLQJXVLQJ
*ODVV)LEUH5HLQIRUFHG*\SVXP*)5*
3DQHOV
Devdas Menon
Department of Civil Engineering
IIT Madras
IJSER
BMTPC & IIT Madras has resulted in the
are currently manufactured to a size of 12m length, development of a ‘GFRG Design Manual’, for the
3m height and 124mm thickness, at FACT, Kochi structural design of these buildings.
and RCF, Mumbai.GFRG panels contain cellular A. Mechanical Properties
cavities between the outer flanges and the inner
The following table provides some of the important
ribs (refer Fig. 1), which can conveniently be filled
mechanical properties of GFRG building panel (for
with concrete and reinforced with steel bars, if
both unfilled panels and panels filled with
required, to achieve the desired capacity as load-
concrete), which have been determined from tests
bearing walls.
conducted at IIT Madras.
Buildings built using this technology (without any TABLE 1. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF GFRG
BUILDING PANEL
columns and beams) can go all the way up to 8 to
Mechanical Property Nominal Value
10 storeys in low to moderate seismic zones, and to
Unit weight 44kg/m2
lesser height in high seismic zones. The empty Modulus of elasticity 7500 N/mm2
cavities in the panels can be used for concealing Uni-axial compressive
160 kN/m (unfilled)
strength, P uc
electrical wiring and other plumbing works. In a 1310 kN/m (filled)
(tests on small sized panels)
typical building, all components, including walls,
21.6 kN/m
slabs, staircases, and even parapet walls can be Ultimate shear strength, V uc
61 kN/m (filled)
constructed using GFRG. This technology also has
the added advantages of sustainability and energy B. Design Philosophy
efficiency because of the recycling of a waste The design capacities are based on limit states
product and also due to significantly less design procedures, considering the ultimate limit
consumption of energy intensive or scarce state for strength design,satisfying the
materials, such as cement, steel, sand and water.IIT serviceability requirements.
IJSER © 2015
http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 7, July-2014
ISSN 2229-5518 166
The partial safety factors for the GFRG building A conservative estimate of the moment capacity
panel (with and without concrete infill) and can be arrived at by ignoring the contribution of
reinforcing steel is taken as P = 1.50 and V = 1.15 GFRG and considering the action of the concrete
respectively, as recommended in IS 456 : 2000. beams occupying the cellular cavities. Accordingly,
Earthquake resistant design is carried out in the design moment capacity is obtained as, M ud =
IJSER
GFRG panel partially filled
expressed in kN/m, are obtained from compression infilled cavities to total no. of
with 20 MPa concrete
cavities)
test results on GFRG building panel for full height
panel, subject to various eccentricities of loading
G. In-plane Bending Capacity
(20 mm, 30 mm and 45 mm) and different
GFRG panels can be used not only as load bearing
boundary conditions. For design purposes, the
walls, but also as walls transferring lateral loads,
nominal values have been divided by P = 1.5.
resisting axial force (P), lateral in-plane shear force
Axial load capacity can be calculated as follows:
(V) and in-plane bending moment (M). The design
Pud (68 0.9e) ,for unfilled panels, and in-plane bending capacity (M ud ) and its relationship
with the design axial load capacity (P ud ) is usually
Pud (600 13.75e) ,for filled panels,
described by means of a P ud - M ud interaction
Out-of-Plane Bending Capacity diagram.
D. Unfilled GFRG Panels Design interaction curves of such panels fully
Higher bending capacity is obtained when the ribs infilled with reinforced concrete (with two
are oriented parallel to the span, and is as shown in reinforcement bars in each cavity) for 1.0m to 3.5m
table below: with intervals of 0.25mhave been developed. A
TABLE 2.OUT-OF-PLANE DESIGN FLEXURAL typical P-M interaction curve is as shown in Fig. 2.
CAPACITY OF UNFILLED GFRG PANEL
Ribs parallel to Ribs H. Design of Floor / Roof Slab
span perpendicular
to span As GFRG panels with ribs aligned in direction of
Design Moment 1.4 kNm/m 0.59 kNm/m
Capacity, 0 XG bending possess flexure, such panels can be used as
flexural slab, whose strength can be significantly
E. Filled GFRG Panels
enhanced by embedding ‘concealed beams’, filled
When the cavities are filled with concrete, full with reinforced concrete (Fig. 3). Unfilled GFRG
composite action of GFRG and concrete cannot be panels can be used as pitched roofs for single
mobilized on account of bond slip at the interface. storey small span buildings.The ribs are to be
IJSER © 2015
http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 7, July-2014
ISSN 2229-5518 167
oriented along the shorter span, supported [2] Janardhana, M.(2010), Cyclic behaviour of glass
on GFRG wall panels. For convenience in fibre reinforced gypsum wall panels, Indian Institute
of Technology Madras, PhD Thesis
design, the contribution of GFRG towards the
[3] GFRG/RAPIDWALL Building Structural Design
flexural strength can be ignored and the GFRG can
Manual, prepared by Structural Engineering
be treated as lost formwork. Reinforced concrete Division, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT
concealed beams are to be provided by filling Madras, 2012.
cavities at regular intervals (typically every third
cavity) and provided with reinforcement suitably
designed, with a screed concrete of thickness not
less than 50 mm. One way slab action may be
assumed for strength and deflection check,
considering T-beam action of the embedded
beams. In the screed concrete, suitable welded
wire fabric shall be provided. The design of
reinforcement in the micro beams shall conform
to the requirements of IS 456: 2000.
I. Demonstration of technology
IJSER
Inorder to demonstrate this technology, a two-
storeyed GFRG demo building was built inside the
IIT Madras campus is shown in Fig.4. This
building, constructed within a span of 30 days
housing a total area of 1981 sq.ft., has 4 flats, two
having a carpet area of 269 sq.ft meant for the
EWS (economically weaker section), and the other
two with 497sq.ft carpet area each meant for the
LIG. The saving in cost was almost 35%, when
compared to conventional construction.
References
[1] Sreenivasa, R. L (2010), Strength and behaviour of
glass fibre reinforced gypsum wall panels, Indian
Institute of Technology Madras, PhD Thesis
IJSER © 2015
http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 7, July-2014
ISSN 2229-5518 168
250
15
Gypcrete Glass fibre
(gypsumplaster+glassfibr
94
e + other ingredients)
‘rib’ ‘flange’
15
20 230
All dimensions are in mm
Fig. 1. Enlarged view of a typical cell of GFRG panel
IJSER
Fig. 2.Design P u -M u plots for 1.50 m wide GFRG panel with M25 concrete infill
d
124
15
IJSER © 2015
http://www.ijser.org