Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................1
1.1 Objectives..................................................................................................................1
1.2 Principles....................................................................................................................1
1.3 Literature Review......................................................................................................1
1.4 Materials and Equipments.......................................................................................2
CHAPTER 2 EXPERIMENTAL SCHEME....................................................................3
CHAPTER 3 DISCUSSION..........................................................................................4
3.1 Data and Result........................................................................................................4
3.1.1 Turbidity Analysis...............................................................................................4
3.1.2 pH analysis.........................................................................................................4
3.1.3 Jartest..................................................................................................................5
3.2 Discussion..................................................................................................................8
3.2.1 pH analysis.........................................................................................................8
3.2.2 Turbidity analysis...............................................................................................9
3.2.3 Jar test.................................................................................................................9
CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSION......................................................................................14
4.1 Conclusion...............................................................................................................14
4.2 Questions and Answers.........................................................................................14
References.................................................................................................................15
1
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Objectives
To determine the optimum dose of alum for effective coagulation-flocculation of the
surface water sample.
1.2 Principles
This experiment includes three sub-experiments. The first experiment is the
analysis of turbidity, which is determined based on diversion of light by particle
suspension inside the water sample and by using a turbidimeter. The second
analysis is pH analysis to determine the hidrogen ion (H +) concentration in the
solution, by using pH meter.
The last part of the experiment is conducting jar-test on water sample to know
the optimum dosage of alum added. This is done by first adding alum to separated
water samples to form different concentrations and followed by the process of
coagulation, flocculation and sedimentation of the solutions. The resulting solutions
will then be analyzed physically (pH and turbidity) again.
pH is the most important in determining the corrosive nature of water. Lower the
pH value higher is the corrosive nature of water. pH was positively correlated with
electrical conductance and total alkalinity. Various factors bring about changes the
pH of water. The higher pH values observed suggests that carbon dioxide,
carbonate-bicarbonate equilibrium is affected more due to change in
physicochemical condition (Patil et al, 2012).
a) Dry with tissue paper and then rinse electrode with distilled water
CHAPTER 2
EXPERIMENTAL SCHEME
10 L of water samples
3% Alum
Result
4
CHAPTER 3
DISCUSSION
3.1 Data and Result
3.1.1 Turbidity Analysis
3.1.2 pH analysis
No Treatment Observation Picture
1 Sufficient amount of raw water Characteristics of water
sample is transferred into 50 sample :
mL beaker glass - Turbid
- Smells bad
- Normal temperature
5
3.1.3 Jartest
No Treatment Observation Picture
Characteristics of water
sample :
Around 12 L of raw water is
collected from a river in front - Turbid
1. of Hang Tuah University by a - Smells bad
bucket into a jerry can - Normal temperature
- Clear to Amber or
Light Green
supernatant gradually
clarifies; solids collect at
the bottom of the jar to
The beakers are let alone to
7. form a sediment, and the
allow settling for 30 minutes
supernatant-suspension
interface is generally
indistinct.
Reading results:
0 mg/L : 22 NTU
30 mg/L: 19 NTU
60 mg/L : 17 NTU
90 mg/L : 17 NTU
The turbidity were measured 120 mg/L: 15 NTU
for each sample by turbidity 150 mg/L: 14 NTU
9. meter and the reading result
are recorded 180 mg/L: 9,8 NTU
240 mg/L: 7,4 NTU
300 mg/L: 5,8 NTU
600 mg/L: 4 NTU
900 mg/L: 4,2 NTU
1200 mg/L: 7,3 NTU
3.2 Discussion
The third experiment of Environmental Pollution Analytical Technique was conducted
on Friday, March 4th, 2019 in Water Treatment Laboratory, Environmental Engineering
ITS at 08.00 AM - 11.00 AM. There are 3 sub experiments in this experiment. They are
pH analysis, turbidity analysis, and jartest. The required equipments and materials for
this experiment are six-paddle jar test apparatus with illuminated base, six 1 litre jars, six
10 ml beakers, one 10 ml graduated pipettes, turbidimeter, pH meter, aluminum sulfate
(alum), and raw water sample. This time, we select raw water from a river in front of
Hang Tuah University. The water was taken by throwing away a bucket attached with a
rope and pull it up, then transfered into a jerry can until around 12 L. This method of
sampling known as depth-wise sampling. The characteristic of the raw water is smells
bad, turbid, contain some particles that are visible, and has a greenish color.
The purpose of the laboratory jar test is to select and quantify a treatment program
for removal of suspended solids or oil from raw water or a diluteprocess or waste stream.
Jar tests are conducted on a six-place gang stirrer, which can be utilized to simulate
9
mixing and settling conditions in a clarifier. Jars (beakers) with different treatment
programs or the same product at different dosages are run side-by-side, and the results
compared to an untreated jar for pH and turbidity. The goal of the testing was to identify
the dose of alum required to achieve a certain goals of water treatment. The tests were
performed at doses of 0 (control, before), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 80 and
100 mg/L Alum.
3.2.1 pH analysis
The pH of water sample is measured by knowing the hydrogen ion (H+)
concentration using a pH meter to determine the acidity or base level. pH solution is the
minus logarithm of hydrogen ion concentration assigned by measuring method by
potensiometry using pH meter. The pH of water sample is measured by knowing the
hydrogen ion (H+) concentration using a pH meter to determine the acidity or base level.
The procedure started by drying the electrode with tissue paper and rinsing the
electrode with distilled water so that the pH meter rod is neutralized from impurities
which can affect the pH measurement results Next, electrode rinsed by sample water
and then dipped in the sample water in 50mL beaker glass until pH meter showed a
fixed reading. Note down reading scale or value on the pH meter display (SNI National
Standard Board, 2004). The reading result was 8,14 and this result was recorded to be
compared with the same raw water that has already been treated by jartest.
According to the Republic of Indonesia PERMENKES No. 492 / Menkes /
Per / IV / 2010, the standard for pH quality of drinking water is 6.5-8.5. Therefore, we
can know that water samples meet the quality standards used.
This result were recorded as well so that we can see how before and after
jartest treatment samples. The turbidity parameters were selected in this experiment
because of its relationship with the colloidal particles or suspended material that
affect the degree of transparency of the water; pH, since each coagulant has an
10
optimal range of pH within which the action turns out to be more efficien (León-
Luque et al, 2016).
3.2.3 Jartest
The potabilization process aims to offer safe water that fulfill the
requirements established in the local regulations. Inside these processes, one of
the most used and important in superficial waters is the coagulation and flocculation,
which aims to eliminate turbidity in order to remove the suspended particles in water
using flocculants. To reach high levels of reduction is necessary to look for an optimal
dosage of coagulant, which generally is calculated by means of the “Jar Test,”
working under a uniform condition of turbidity. However the turbidity values
change temporarily on the water, affecting the effectiveness of this process, due to
each turbidity value may need a different coagulant dose. Coagulation and
flocculation processes has been object of study and research by different
approaches (León-Luque et. al, 2016).
The jartest started off by filling six 1-L beaker glass with 1000 mL of the water
sample that we collect in a jerry can. Each beakers were dosed with different volume
of 3% alum using the volumetric pipette, ranging from 1 mL to 40 mL. Iron free
Aluminum Sulfate (Alum) is most widely used in municipal drinking water and
wastewater treatment systems. In potable water applications, alum functions as an
excellent primary coagulant. Through charge neutralization and flocculation in raw
water, alum removes: turbidity, suspended solids, total organic carbon (TOC), and
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). Aluminum Sulfate easily hydrolyzes to form
insoluble precipitates which aid in removal of tiny particles that cannot be easily
filtered and/or are too small to settle via gravity in a useful period of time.
Known that 3% alum solution means 1 mL alum equals to 30mg/L as the
concentration itself, then simultaneously with each volume as follows.
40 mL 1200 mg/L
After adding Alum with different dosages, the beakers were then placed under
the paddles of the jar test apparatus and the paddles were lowered to the same
depth in each beaker glass. The water in the beakers was stirred instantly with a
rapid mix of 100 rpm for 1 minute. Its main purpose is to equally disperse the
coagulant into the suspension to incite efficient flocculation. Fast mixing
becomes more fundamental in the case of highly turbid wastewater where the
higher particle collision rate due to the high particle concentration will increase
adsorption and floc formation rates.
After the rapid mix stage, slow mixing was carried at optimum
conditions, reducing the speed to 40 rpm for 15 minutes. This slower mixing speed
helps promote floc formation by enhancing particle collisions, which lead to larger
flocs. Increasing the time of slow mixing increases the number of contacts between
the particles.
After the jar test was performed, the coagulated suspension was left to settle
for 15 minutes. Sedimentation of a suspension is generally assessed by a jar test,
during which a suspension is allowed to settle and the height of the clear liquid
(supernatant)-suspension interface is measured as a function of the settling time. In a
jar test, particles can be observed to settle in any of several quite different ways,
dependent on their concentration and their tendency to cohere. The different modes
of sedimentation make different demands on the size and shape of a settling tank,
and different test procedures are used for evaluating them.
When the particles are, on average, far apart and free to settle individually,
clarification sedimentation occurs. This behavior is recognized in a jar test as slower
settling particles “string out” behind faster ones, and the supernatant gradually
clarifies; solids collect at the bottom of the jar to form a sediment, and the
supernatant-suspension interface is generally indistinct.
4
3
2
1
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Concentration of Alum (mg/L)
12
10
8
7.3
6
4
2
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Concentration of Alum (mg/L)
The data from the experiments are presented in two set of graphs. The first graph is
of final pH value of water samples versus the dose of alum. The graph starts with a pH of
value of 8.14 in the jar with no concentration of alum at all. The pH values then decrease
steadily with the increasing dose of alum into the jar. It then increases slightly to pH = 5.92 in
the jar with 900 mg/L of alum. This shows that the presence of alum affects the pH value of
the water samples.
13
The second graph is the graph of turbidity value against the dose of alum. The graph
started with high turbidity value of 22 NTU. The value dropped to 19 NTU when the alum
was added into the water and continue to decrease until it reaches a value of 4 NTU with
600 mg/L doses of alum. The value started to increase again after this point This is because,
destabilization of colloids occurred with the increment of the alum dosage after the optimum
value.
High turbidity value proved that the water has a high amount of suspended particle.
The lowest values of turbidity and pH at 600 mg/L dose of alum shows that the water is most
clear out of all the samples. Majority of the sediment has coagulated well and settled at the
bottom of the beaker. The restabilization of the colloids happens when the negative particle
from the flocculation process has turned positive and started to repel against each other
again. The optimum dosage value also shows the best coagulation process during the slow
mix.
14
CHAPTER 4
CONCLUSION
4.1 Conclusion
Based on the experiment, 600 mg/L or 20mL doses of alum was identified as the
optimum dosage for the coagulation process because it shows the lowest final turbidity
and pH reading. By the time it reach the lowest value of dose, the pH value reachs 4.
This result has not fulfilled the standard of Indonesia Public Health Ministry Regulation
492/Menkes/per/IV/2010 which states that pH of water must be between 6.5 and 8.5.
Meanwhile the lowest turbidity of 4 NTU has fulfilled the standard of Indonesia Public
Health Ministry Regulation 492/Menkes/per/IV/2010 which states that turbidity of water
must below 5 NTU.
4.2 Questions and Answers
Questions:
1. Mention steps of coagulation and flocculation processes!
2. Mention the important factors in jar-test process!
3. Mention kinds of coagulant that you know!
4. Explain how important coagulation process or flashmix is in decreasing process of
turbidity!
5. In which pH does optimum coagulation process happen and explain how!
Answers:
1. - Mix the reagen by fast stirring 100 rpm for 1minutes
- Slow stirring to form flocs with 40-60 rpm speed for 15 minutes
- Sedimentation proces for 15 minutes, for get rid of floca with colloid that bind in
solution
2. - pH of the solution
- Amount and kind of flocculation
- Amount and kind suspended substance
- temperature and alkalinity
- the presence of dissolved of specific ions
3. Examples of primary coagulants are metallic salts, such as aluminum sulfate
(referred to as alum), ferric sulfate, and ferric chloride. Cationic polymers may also
be used as primary coagulants
References
Badan Standarisasi Nasional (BSN). 2004. Air dan air limbah – Bagian 11: Cara uji derajat
keasaman (pH) dengan menggunakan alat pH meter. Jakarta. SNI 06-6989.11.
León-Luque, A. J., Barajas, C. L., and C.A. Peña-Guzmán. 2016. Determination of the
Optimal Dosage of Aluminum Sulfatein the Coagulation-Flocculation Process Using an
Artificial Neural Network. International Journal of Environmental Science and
Development 7(5)
Patil, P.,N., Sawant, D.,V., Desmukh, R., N. 2012. Physico-Chemical Parameters For Testing
of Water. International Journal of Environmental Sciences 3(3) : 1194-1207.