Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#801
COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Saturday, February 09, 2019 10:47:22 AM
Last Modified: Saturday, February 09, 2019 10:59:33 AM
Time Spent: 00:12:11
IP Address: 173.50.93.45

Page 1: Placement Information

Q1 Student Teacher's Name

Christina Lewis

Q2 Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Secondary Education,

English

Q3 Grade Taught Middle School

Q4 Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

01/14/2019

Q5 Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

03/08/2019

Q6 School of Student Teaching Placement

Lynnhaven MS

Q7 School Division Virginia Beach City Public Schools

Q8 Evaluator's Name (First Last)

Sandra Cox

Q9 Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.

Email Address: sccox@regent.edu

1/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q10 Evaluator's Position/Role University Supervisor

Q11 What time period is this evaluation for? Mid-Term

Page 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject area(s) Proficient

taught.
Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the age Proficient
group.
Integrates key content elements and facilitates students’ use of Proficient
higher level thinking skills.
Links content with other subject areas and real world applications. Proficient

Q13 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.

Demonstrated content with real-world applications: author's use of figurative language and student's own writing.

Page 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Aligns lesson objectives to the school’s curriculum and student Proficient

learning needs.
Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner needs; Developing
adapts plans as needed.
Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Proficient
transitions.
Plans for differentiated instruction. Developing

Q15 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.

Continue to adapt plans to differentiate instruction to meet varying needs in the classroom.

Page 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

2/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q16 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Engages and maintains students in active learning. Proficient

Differentiates instruction to meet the students’ needs. Developing
Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Superior
Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources. Proficient
Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Proficient

Q17 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.

Learning goals reinforced throughout the lesson including a posted learning target, listing and review of objectives on Promethium board
and reinforcement throughout the lesson.

Page 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

Q18 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Developing

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Developing
instruments
Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Developing
purposes.
Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Proficient

Q19 Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student learning.

Begin to use and document learning data to guide instruction. Demonstrated feedback to students throughout the lesson through
questioning.

Page 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Proficient

procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.
Uses available resources and knowledge of students to prevent, Proficient
redirect, or reinforce behaviors.
Respects students’ diversity, including language, culture, race, Proficient
gender, and special needs.
Actively listens and pays attention to students’ needs and Proficient
responses.

Q21 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive to
learning.

Demonstrated command of the classroom through firm but positive voice tone and smiling.

3/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Page 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

Q22 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Modifies performance based on personal and professional Developing

critiques.
Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Proficient
professional interactions.
Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with Proficient
teachers and other school personnel.
Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and ethical Proficient
interactions.

Q23 Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.

Continue to revise instructional techniques based on cooperating teacher feedback.

Page 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Documents the progress of each student throughout the Developing

placement.
Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Developing
Uses available data to document/communicate student progress Developing
and develop learning targets.

Q25 Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.

Collect and organize student learning progress in the area(s) in which you have taught.

4/4