Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following link:
STEP Standard 1, Part I
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning Management System (LMS).
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following link:
STEP Standard 1, Part II
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning Management System (LMS).
Learning Goal
The goal is for students to be able to find and measure perimeter.
Measurable Objectives
Monday/Day 1: The students will be able to solve for perimeter using different polygons with 75% accuracy.
Tuesday/Day 1: The students will measure and calculate perimeter using patterned blocks with 90% accuracy.
Thursday/Day 4: The students will participate in a perimeter scavenger hunt with a partner to locate 6 rectangles in the room, measure
the sides using a ruler, and solve for perimeter.
Friday/Day 5: The students will complete a post-assessment demonstrating their understanding of measuring and finding perimeter
with 100% accuracy.
Perimeter Pre-Assessment
3. Gretchen made this table to show the side lengths and perimeters of three figures.
Gretchen’s
Side Lengths Perimeter
Figures (yards) (yards)
Figure
Square 6, 6, 6, 6 24
Triangle 4, 7, 8 19
Rectangle 4, 8, 4, 8 32
A 14 cm
B 28 cm
C 45 cm
D 32 cm
Pre-Assessment Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ knowledge on the topic,
collect and analyze the pre-assessment data to determine if you will need to modify the standards,
learning goal, or measurable objectives that will be addressed during instruction.
Number of Students
Partially Proficient
(70%-79%) 4
Minimally Proficient
(69% and below) 7
The perimeter unit I am beginning on week 8 has not been taught to my cooperative classroom students.
Based on the data scores from the pre-assessment, I am selecting state academic standards, a learning
goal, and measurable objectives that will help students gain crucial knowledge to be successful with
Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge of the topic after implementing the
unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same as the pre-assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same
concepts. Include the scoring criteria used to determine whether the student Exceeds, Meets, Approaches, or Falls Far Below the learning goal
and measurable objectives.
I plan to use the same scoring criteria as the pre-assessment. The criteria are as follows: High Proficiency (90-100%), Proficient
(80-89%), Partially Proficient (70-79%), and Minimally Proficient (69% and below).
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
2. Gretchen made this table to show the side lengths and perimeters of three figures.
Gretchen’s
Side Lengths Perimeter
Figures (yards) (yards)
Figure
Square 6, 6, 6, 6 24
Triangle 4, 7, 8 19
Rectangle 4, 8, 4, 8 32
A 3 inches
B 6 inches
C 10 inches
D 8 inches
4. A rectangular business card is shown. Use the ruler provided to measure the length and width of the business
card to the nearest centimeter.
A 14 cm
B 28 cm
C 45 cm
D 32 cm
Reference: Texas Education Agency. (2019). STAAR released test questions. Retrieved from
https://tea.texas.gov/Student_Testing_and_Accountability/Testing/State_of_Texas_Assessments_of_Academ
ic_Readiness_(STAAR)/STAAR_Released_Test_Questions/
Differentiation Students with Students with Students with Students with Students with
What are the disabilities- I will disabilities- I will disabilities- I will disabilities- I will disabilities- The
adaptations or provide a wait time provide a wait time provide a wait time provide a wait time post-assessment
modifications to the for students with for students with for students with for students with can be administered
instruction/activities disabilities and disabilities and disabilities and disabilities and in small group at
as determined by those who are those who are those who are those who are the teacher table. I
the student factors performing below performing below performing below performing below will provide a wait
Post-Test Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ learning on the topic, collect and
analyze the post-test data to determine the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment.
Number of Students Number of Students
Pre-Test Post-Test
Highly Proficient
(90%-100%) 2 4
Proficient
(80%-89%) 0 1
Partially
Proficient
4 1
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
7 6
(69% and below)
When reflecting on my post-assessment data, I felt as though some positive gains were made. For
instance, I had two more students score in the highly proficient, one student scored in the
proficient, and one student moved into the partially proficient from the minimally proficient
group. This upward movement demonstrates that effective student learning took place during my
perimeter unit. I would have loved to have seen more movement from the minimally proficient
group, but I feel that a small group to reteach and review perimeter would help them gain a
deeper understanding of the concept.
Overall, I feel that my instruction was effective. I feel this way because my data demonstrates an
upward movement in proficiently levels. Upward movement is exhibited by two students gaining
highly proficient, one student gaining proficient, and one student moving from minimally
proficient. My post-assessment accurately measured the different skills taught throughout the
perimeter unit. I do feel a sense of concern because six students remain in the minimally
proficient level. I have set down one-on-one with each student to review their post-assessment
results and to guide them through making corrections. I feel like a small group review will help
these students move toward the proficient level.
The best subgroup to examine from my post-assessment is the boys. There are eight boys total in
the subgroup. I selected this group of students because they were able to post-assess completely.
I had one girl student who has been absent for an extended amount of time. Additionally, two
students from my list of students with IEPs/504 plans are pulled out during math instruction to
Post-Assessment Data: Subgroup (Gender, ELL population, Gifted, students on IEPs or 504s, etc.)
Proficient
(80%-89%) 0 1
Partially
Proficient
1 1
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
6 4
(69% and below)
When examining the post-assessment data, I can see evidence of an upward direction of
movement as two students moved from minimally proficient. One student reached the highly
proficient level and one student reached the proficient level. Additionally, one student fell from
partially proficient to minimally proficient and three students remained in the minimally
proficient level.
Overall, I feel the data indicates some effective learning took place based on the upward
movement of two boys in my subgroup. The additional students in my subgroup exhibited
similar performance to what I am seeing in the classroom when working one-on-one with
students and looking at their daily work. I do feel that the assessment was an accurate
representation of the objectives, lessons, and activities planned and carried out during my
perimeter unit. I have set down one-on-one with each student to review their post-assessment
data and work through any areas they are continuing to struggle. My plan for the future is to
continue to review these concepts with students based on the initial objectives planned for the
perimeter unit. Students complete a daily warm-up that spirals various concepts from the entire
school year called Lone Star as well as a STAAR Countdown homework page. I will monitor
students’ progress throughout these activities as well as during our small-group at the teacher
table to incorporate as much review as possible.
Proficient
(80%-89%) 0 0
Partially
Proficient
3 0
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
1 2
(69% and below)
When looking at the remaining student data, it is important to note that one student has been out
for an extended period of time and unable to take the assessment. This student originally scored
in the highly proficient level in pre-assessment, and I feel confident her post-assessment will
reflect the same. The post-assessment data demonstrate an upward movement form partially
proficient to highly proficient for two of the remaining students. One student fell from partially
proficient to minimally proficient.
Based on my analysis of student learning, I feel that the next steps for instruction allow us to
move forward with our unit on area with a review of perimeter. As mentioned with the subgroup
post-assessment analysis, students complete a warm-up each morning that spirals all concepts
taught throughout the year. Additionally, students are practicing a spiral review as homework
that spirals all the concepts. During my small-group math rotation with students, I can focus
specifically on a review with students who are still performing at the proficient, partially
proficient, and minimally proficient levels. As we move forward into area, one objective to build
upon perimeter is students will demonstrate the difference between area and perimeter by
designing a carnival with 90% accuracy.