Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Received on 25 November, 2017; received in revised form, 11 February, 2018; accepted, 04 March, 2018; published 01 August, 2018
3. Wavelength range: 400 - 200 nm MF and 10 - 60 μg/ml of BER were prepared from
4. Absorbance scale: 0.00A - 2.00A the standard stock solutions of both drugs. The
5. Initial base line correction: Methanol absorbance was measured at 257 nm (λmax of MF)
and at 317 nm (λmax of BER). Calibration curves
Chemicals and Reagents: MF reference standard were constructed by plotting absorbance vs.
was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. BER reference concentration.
standard was given as gift sample by Enovate life
Mumbai. Preparation of Sample Solution from
Laboratory Prepared Synthetic Mixture:
Preparation of Standard Solutions: To Prepare Synthetic mixture of MF (25 mg) and BER (75 mg)
standard solution of MF (100 μg/ml) and BER was prepared by using common excipients like
(1000 μg/ml), accurately weigh 25 mg of each Corn Starch (50 mg), Lactose (113 mg) and
drugs were transferred in two different 100 and 10 Magnesium Stearate (2 mg) per tablet. Tablet
ml volumetric flasks respectively, dissolve and powder was prepared by calculating formula for 10
diluted up to mark with methanol, from these stock Tablets having label claim for MF and BER 25 mg
solutions, 5 ml and 1 ml aliquots of MF and BER and 75 mg respectively. From this mixture, powder
respectively were transferred in two different 10 ml equivalent to 45 mg BER was dissolved in 250 ml
volumetric flasks and were diluted up to mark with methanol and then sonicated for 15 min. and
methanol to get working standard solution having filtered through Whatman filter paper. From this
concentration of MF of 50 μg/ml and BER of 100 solution, 2.5 ml aliquot was taken in 10 ml
μg/ml. volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark with
methanol to make final concentration of MF and
Methodology: Absorbance ratio method uses the
BER, 15 μg/ml and 45 μg/ml, respectively which
ratio of absorbances at two selected wavelengths,
was used for assay.
one which is an iso-absorptive point and other
being the λmax of one of the two components. From RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
the overlay spectra of two drugs, it is evident that Method Development: For this measurement, the
MF and BER show an iso-absorptive point at 317 solutions of MF and BER were prepared separately
nm. The second wavelength used is 257 nm, which in methanol at a concentration of 15 μg/ml and 45
is the λmax of MF. Working standards were μg/ml respectively. They were scanned in the
prepared in methanol and the absorbances at 317 wavelength range of 200 - 400 nm. From the
nm (iso-absorptive point) and 257 nm (λmax of MF) overlay spectra of two drugs, it is evident that MF
were measured and absorptivity coefficients were and BER show an iso-absorptive point at 317 nm.
calculated using calibration curve. The MF showed 241 nm, 257 nm, 317 nm, 366 nm λmax
concentration of two drugs in the mixture can be from which 257 nm was selected as λmax of MF in
calculated using following equations. this method due to good linearity Fig. 1.
CX = [(QM – QY) / (QX -QY)] × A1 / ax1 .... (1) Validation of the Proposed Method:
Linearity: Linear correlation was obtained
CY = [(QM – QX) / (QY -QX)] × A1 /ay1 … (2)
between absorbance vs. concentration of MF and
Where, A1 and A2 are absorbances of mixture at BER in the concentration ranges of 5 - 30 μg/ml
257 nm and 317 nm; ax1 and ay1 are absorptivities and 10 - 60 μg/ml respectively and is shown in
of MF and BER at 257 nm; ax2 and ay2 are overlain chromatogram of MF and BER, Fig. 2 and
absorptivities of MF and BER respectively at 317 3 respectively.
nm;
Calibration curve data of MF and BER shown in
QM = A2 / A1, QX = ax2 / ax1, QY = ay2 / ay1 Table 1 and 2. Regression parameters are
mentioned in Table 3 and the linearity spectra and
Calibration Curve for MF and BER: To check calibration curves of these two drugs at 257 nm and
linearity of the method, working standard solution 317 nm are shown in Fig. 4, 5 and 6, 7
having concentration in range of 5 - 30 μg/ml of respectively.
FIG. 1: ZERO ORDER OVERLAIN SPECTRA OF MF (10 μg/ml), BER (45 μg/ml) AND COMBINATION (10 μg/ml
MF AND 45 μg/ml BER)
A B
FIG. 2: (A) OVERLAIN SPECTRA OF MF (5 - 30 μg/ml) IN METHANOL (B) OVERLAIN SPECTRA OF BER (10 -
60 μg/ml) IN METHANOL
TABLE 1: LINEARITY DATA FOR MF
S. no. Concentration of MF At Wavelength 257 nm At Wavelength 317 nm
(μg/ml) Absorbance (Mean ± SD) % RSD Absorbance (Mean ± SD) % RSD
1 5 0.224 ± 0.004 1.61 0.221 ± 0.003 0.44
2 10 0.391 ± 0.002 0.62 0.293 ± 0.004 0.94
3 15 0.555 ± 0.002 0.59 0.345 ± 0.004 0.34
4 20 0.687 ± 0.003 0.26 0.434 ± 0.002 0.55
5 25 0.745 ± 0.004 0.36 0.500 ± 0.002 0.72
6 30 0.895 ± 0.003 0.34 0.586 ± 0.004 0.94
Accuracy: Accuracy of the method was confirmed found to be in range of 99.84 - 101.10%. The
by recovery study from marketed formulation at results are shown in Table 4 and 5. Recovery
three levels of standard additions (80%, 100% and greater than 98% with low SD justifies the
120%). Percentage recovery for MF was in the accuracy of the method.
range of 99.99 - 100.07%, while for BER, it was
TABLE 4: RECOVERY DATA FOR MF found to be 1.12% and 1.02% at 257 nm and 317
% Conc. of MF Conc. of MF % Recovery of %
Level in sample recovered MF (% RSD
nm, respectively for MF and 1.03 and 0.90% at 257
(μg/ml) (μg/ml) Recovery ± SD) nm and 317 nm respectively for BER. % R.S.D was
80% 12 11.90 99.99 ± 1.92 1.92 less than 2% complied with the standard limits.
12 11.67
12 12.10 TABLE 6: REPEATABILITY DATA FOR MF AND BER
100% 15 14.02 100.00 ± 0.65 0.65 Drug Conc. Abs. (Mean ± % Abs. (Mean ± %
15 15.98 (μg/ml) SD) at 257 RSD SD) at 317 RSD
15 15.10 nm nm
120% 18 18.09 100.07 ± 0.49 0.49 MF 15 0.555 ± 1.12 0.343 ± 1.02
18 18.00 0.008 0.006
18 17.95 BER 45 0.759 ± 1.03 0.353 ± 0.90
0.007 0.004
TABLE 5: RECOVERY DATA FOR BER
% Conc. of BER Conc. of BER % Recovery of % Intra Day and Inter Day Precision (n = 3): The
Level in sample recovered BER (%) RSD
(μg/ml) (μg/ml) data for intraday precision for MF and BER is
80% 36 36.11 101.83 ± 1.19 1.18 shown in Table 7. The % R.S.D. for Intraday
36 36.79 precision was found to be 0.22 - 0.40% for MF and
36 36.00
100% 45 45.02 100.07 ± 0.14 1.12 0.34 - 0.56% for BER at 257 nm respectively and
45 44.98 0.45 - 1.26% for MF and 0.37 - 0.59% for BER at
45 45.10 317 nm respectively. The data for intraday
120% 54 54.09 99.84 ± 0.30 0.30
54 53.77 precision for MF and BER is shown in Table 8.
54 53.88 The % R.S.D. for interday precision was found to
be 0.96 - 1.75% for MF and 1.58 - 1.89% for BER
Precision: at 257 nm respectively and 0.96 - 1.01% for MF
Repeatability (n = 6): The repeatability was and 0.89 - 1.89% for BER at 317 nm respectively.
checked by scanning and measurement of the
responses of solutions of MF (5 - 30 μg/ml) and LOD and LOQ: The LOD was calculated by
BER (10 - 60 μg/ml) without changing the standard deviation of response and was found to be
parameters of the proposed method. The procedure 2.33 μg/ml and 5.22 μg/ml for MF and BER
was repeated six times and % RSD was calculated. respectively at 257nm, be 2.30 μg/ml and 4.32
The data for repeatability for combined solution of μg/ml for MF and BER respectively at 317 nm. The
MF and BER is presented in Table 6. % R.S.D was LOQ was calculated by standard deviation of
response and was found to be 3.91 μg/ml and 6.69 3.22 μg/ml and 7.22 μg/ml for MF and BER
μg/ml for MF and BER respectively at 257 nm, be respectively at 317 nm.
TABLE 7: INTRADAY PRECISION DATA FOR MF AND BER
S. no. Drug Concentration Absorbance % RSD Absorbance % RSD
(μg/ml) (Mean ± SD) at 257 nm (Mean ± SD) 317 nm
1 MF 10 0.391 ± 0.002 0.22 0.520 ± 0.005 0.45
2 15 0.555 ± 0.002 0.23 0.630 ± 0.005 0.67
3 20 0.687 ± 0.003 0.40 0.756 ± 0.008 1.26
1 BER 30 0.565 ± 0.004 0.44 0.522 ± 0.002 0.37
2 40 0.672 ± 0.003 0.34 0.635 ± 0.005 0.59
3 50 0.745 ± 0.004 0.56 0.743 ± 0.005 0.54
This article can be downloaded to ANDROID OS based mobile. Scan QR Code using Code/Bar Scanner from your mobile. (Scanners are available on Google
Playstore)