Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2
Background ............................................................................................................................................. 2
Drinking water quality standards ............................................................................................................ 3
Project requirements .............................................................................................................................. 4
Measurement of Water Quality .............................................................................................................. 4
Design of Conventional Water Treatment Facility .................................................................................. 6
Flash mixing & Slow mixing (Coagulation and Flocculation)................................................................... 7
Coagulant Dosage ............................................................................................................................... 7
Control of pH....................................................................................................................................... 8
Rapid Mixing Tank Design ................................................................................................................... 8
Design of flocculation basin .................................................................................................................... 9
Design of Sedimentation Tank .............................................................................................................. 10
Filtration................................................................................................................................................ 11
Disinfection ........................................................................................................................................... 11
Design Summary ................................................................................................................................... 13
References ............................................................................................................................................ 14
Introduction
Potable water is perhaps the most basic human need. The provision of adequate
potable water for the humanity is among the most challenging endeavours, especially in the
presence of today’s increasing pollution levels. The general criteria upon which water is
assessed is the odour, clarity, and taste. Also, the concentration levels of some toxic
chemicals such as sulphides, sulphates, and chlorides determine the type of treatments needed
to meet the municipal potable water requirements. There are several factors that influence the
design of a water treatment facility. Among those, are the water source nature, the
concentration of minerals, and the quality that is aimed for, of the effluent water. Clearly, the
quality of the effluent water is mostly based on the end use, which is not limited only to the
human consumption of potable water, but also includes irrigation, power generation, and
industrial use. Of course, the end use decides which water source is most appropriate and
requires less sophisticated procedures to produce cost effective and adequate amounts of
treated water.
Background
Again, the water source is a great indicator of how polluted the raw water is. Thus,
through several sampling tests of the water source, the environmental engineer can determine
the treatment processes required to get to the desired water quality. The general criteria which
correlates the water source with the level of pollution, and consequently the required water
Table (1): Water treatment processes based on the type of water source and level of pollution [1]
These rules have been reinforced by the USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
which has developed drinking water standards, that are in accordance with the above-mentioned
rules, as shown in the table below:
Table (2): Potable water standards [2]
Project requirements
The Lake major plant’s capacity is 94,000 m3/day as shown in table 5. Although the
plant capacity seems to be quite large, the average production of the treatment plant is about
40,100 m3/day. However, the design of the treatment plant will target the total plant’s
capacity, which is quite larger than the average daily production in order to avoid fatigue and
dissolved oxygen. Although the latter is not easily dissolved in water, it is very essential for
the aquatic life. It is noteworthy that the amount of dissolved oxygen in water decreases with
the increase of temperature levels. At its maximum, D.O could get as high as 9 mg/L of
water. A lot more important than the amount of dissolved oxygen is the rate at which
BOD, biochemical oxygen demand, indicate a clear water source. BOD is can be defined as a
measure of the oxygen amount required by the bacteria to decompose the organic matter.
Since there is not enough data on the characteristics of the raw water, it is assumed that the
selected to convert the raw water from the Lake Major into the desired drinking water that the
end user can make use of. Below is an outline that illustrates the treatment processes that the
raw water should pass through to meet Halifax municipal water qualities listed in table 4.
Almost in every part of the world, and regardless of the water source and its water
quality, the raw water needs to be pass through different treatment stages, of course with
varying degrees, before it can be pumped into the distribution system. Many different types
of contaminants and impurities are in contact with the surface water, and may result in
catastrophic health diseases if dissolved in our drinking water. As previously mentioned, the
quality of the raw water decides the levels of treatment that it may need to match the
standards of the drinking water. In this project, judging from the water characteristics listed in
table 4, it is assumed that the raw water of the Lake Major is a surface water source with
figure 1, will be adopted to get to the desired water qualities, summarized in table 4.
Flash mixing & Slow mixing (Coagulation and Flocculation)
The purpose of flash or quick mixing is to produce a mixture with high levels of
homogeneity between the influent water and the coagulants. The addition of coagulants aids
in the destabilization process of the particles in collision. In other words, rapid mixing is
defined as the dispersion of coagulants in the body of influent water. Below is a table that
summarizes the most important parameters of our prosed flash mixing basin:
The raw water that enters the proposed system is deemed to have a high level of
turbidity, which is caused by movement and collision of different particles. These particles
seem to be in constant motion, due to the electrostatic charges that they carry, as they enter
the plant. An easy way to reduce the turbidity level from 0.3 to less than 0.03 is by adding
alum, which will neutralize the charges, and mitigate collision among the charged particles.
The addition of alum to the inlet water will aid in producing flocs, sticky and large particles
that can be filtered easily. The process of neutralizing the colloidal particles is defined as
coagulation, where as the formation of larger flocs is called flocculation. These two processes
are elementary for treatment of raw water, and they constitute the first two stages of our
water treatment plant design, thus we need to start our design with the calculation of three
important factors, the alum dosage, the velocity gradient, and the hydraulic detention
time.
Coagulant Dosage
From a practical point of view, Alum is used most effectively when the raw water lies within
the range of 5-7.5 [5]. Most water treatment facilities use alum at a dose that ranges from 5
mg/L to 50 mg/L[5]. In our case, we will assume an alum dose of 20 mg/L. Therefore, the
daily amount of alum needed to cover the average daily production of the plant is:
Control of pH
When Alum is added to the raw water, in the presence of high levels of alkalinity, the
However, when an inadequate amount of alkalinity is available, the following reaction takes
The plant’s capacity is Q= 94000m3/day. We will assume 2 min detention time for rapid
mixing, a velocity gradient equal to 600 sec-1, a water depth of 2.5 m, and a total of 4 basins.
A=32.6/2.5=13 m2
4𝑥13
Tank equivalent diameter= √ = 4.1 𝑚
𝜋
Geometric ratio Allowable range Radial Impeller Diameter
0.8 1.1 1.4
D/T 0.14-0.5 0.19 0.27 0.34
H/D 2.0-4.0 3.13 2.27 1.79
H/T 0.28-2.0 0.61 0.61 0.61
B/D 0.7-1.6 1 0.76 0.6
1
11759 3
Rotational speed= [5.7𝑥1000𝑥1.15 ] = 1.1 𝑟𝑝𝑠 = 65.2 𝑟𝑝𝑚
as mentioned in table 3. We will assume that the dimensions of the flocculation tank, based
on trial and error analysis, are 83 ft in length, 42 ft in width, and 14 ft in depth. In this
project, the total power input is taken as 201 ft-lb/sec and the dynamic viscosity of water at
40 F is 3.228 x 10-5 lb-sec/ft2. From the dynamic viscosity, input power, and the tank volume,
𝑃 201
𝐺=√ =√ = 11.3 𝑠𝑒𝑐 −1
𝑉𝜇 83𝑥42𝑥14𝑥3.228𝑥10−5
Where,
G=Velocity gradient in sec-1
µ=
Dynamic viscosity in lb-sec/ft2
V=Tank volume in m3 or ft3
Where,
t=hydraulic detention time in min
Q=Design capacity m3/min
The general acceptable design value of G ranges between 30 to 60 sec-1 [6]. To match
the general acceptable standards, the power input is increased to 500 ft-lb/sec, whereas the
flocculator’s dimensions are reduced to 50 ftx30ftx10 ft. Repeating the same calculations,
would result in increasing G up to 32 sec-1 and reducing t down to 6.5 mins. Again, to
check our design, the typical values of the term Gt varies from 104 to 105[6]. In our case, Gt
pattern of upward flow. There are four different types of sedimentation tanks: inlet, outlet,
For this project, assume 25 clarifiers, with the following dimensions: 24.4 mx4.88mx4.57 .
Detention time= (24.4x4.88x4.57)/(94000/25)=0.145 day= 208 mins
Overflow rate= (3760/(24.4x4.88) = 32 m/day
Horizontal Velocity= (3760/(4.88x4.57)= 169 m/day
Weir Loading rate= Q/2.5 w= 3760/(2.5 x 4.88)= 308m/day
Filtration
The water that exits the clarifier may not be totally free of flocs. The turbidity of
water leaving the sedimentation tank generally has turbidity levels that range from 1 to 10 TU
[6]. Thus, to decrease turbidity down to 0.2 TU, a rapid sand filter must be utilized. Sand
filtration is the separation of suspended and colloidal particles through the passage of water
into a soil media. In this project, we will utilize 10 rapid sand filter which has the following
Cost minimization suggests that the best length to width ration is 3:6
Disinfection
Disinfection is the process of destroying disease causing pathogens. Among the most
called chlorination. Upon the addition of chlorine to water the following reaction take place:
The recommended chlorine dosages are summarized in the following table:
Raw: 6-12
Septic
Settled: 5-10
Septic 3-6
Normal 5-10
Poor
Normal 3-8
Poor
Normal 3-5
Poor
Assume a chlorine dosage of 5 mg/L. Total amount of chlorine per day is:
amount of 1880 kg should be mixed and dispersed in the coagulation basin. We will have a
total of four rapid mixing tanks, one flocculation tank, 25 clarifiers, and a total of 10 rapid
sand filters of which are 9 in service. Finally, chlorination has been selected as our
[2] American Society of Civil Engineers, & American Water Works Association.
(1998). Water treatment plant design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[3] Halifax Water, "Integrated Resource Plan", Advocate Printing, Canada, 2017.
[4] Robert A. Corbitt: Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering, Second
Edition. WATER TREATMENT, Chapter (McGraw-Hill Professional, 1999),
AccessEngineering
[5] Peavy, H., Rowe, D., & Tchobanoglous, G. (1985). Environmental
engineering (Mcgraw-hill series in water resources and environmental engineering).
New York: McGraw-Hill.
[6] Weiner, R., Matthews, R., & Vesilind, P. (2003). Environmental engineering (4th ed.)
[4th ed.]. Burlington: Elsevier. (2003). Retrieved October 17, 2018, from INSERT-
MISSING-DATABASE-NAME.