Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
COMPANY
In 2006 NOEC had yet to drill 4783 because it had other attractive
investments, and because its cash flow was limited at the time. Because the
lease would be automatically cancelled if NOEC did not start drilling by 2007,
Hashim had to decide on several options.
He could assign or sell the lease to another oil company. Because the
lease was located in an oil field containing existing, commercially viable oil
and gas deposits, NOEC believed it could sell the lease for $ 150,000.
Hashim could drill for oil or gas on lease 4783. In the 1,000 hectares
of “Sandusky” oil field around lease 4783, 70 wildcat wells had been
completed by 23 other operators: an oil industry association reported that
21 of the wells were dry holes, 28 were gas wells, 14 were combination oil
and gas, and 7 were oil wells. In addition, 18 wildcat dry holes were drilled
outside the field. Lease 4783, however, was conveniently located in the
middle of the productive Sandusky area.
Hashim determined that the NOEC could expect total lifetime operating
profits (net present value) of $ 1.5 million for a gas well, $ 2 million for a
combination well, and $ 3 million for an oil well. These amounts were net of
____________________________________________________________________________________
This case was written by Prof. Ricardo Lim, Asian Institute of Management. All case materials are prepared solely for the
purpose of class discussion. They are neither designed nor intended to illustrate the correct or incorrect management of
problems or issues contained in the case. Copyright 2016, Asian Institute of Management, Makati City, Philippines,
http://www.aim.edu. No part of this publication may be reproduced or stored without the consent of the Asian Institute of
Management.
National Oil Exploration Company 2
royalties to lease owner Swadi, and net of operating expenses, but before
deducting an estimated $ 1 million cost of drilling a well.
Hashim could easily sell the lease to another operator. Or, he could
gamble and drill, without a proper seismic test. Or, he could commission a
seismic test for Lease 4783 for $300,000. Because NOEC was financially
constrained, the cost of the test was unattractive to NOEC management,
moreso if it yielded an “A” formation: an “A” test would basically kill any
chance that NOEC could sell lease 4783 to another operator. What will
Hashim do?
___________________________________________________________________________
Asian Institute of Management Copyright 2016