Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract
Learning English in an EFL classroom demands the students to learn it as both material and classroom instruction.
English for most EFL students is considered difficult especially when they use it as a means of communication. Since
English becomes a challenge to discuss, it makes most students feel afraid of cooperating and collaborating in learning
processes. A fact showed that a big number of students were reluctant to do group discussion. A five-cycled open lesson
has already conducted as an effort to solve the students’ problems. During the five cycles of Lesson Study, the students
were asked to discuss the material of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and present the result of their discussion
in front of other groups. The targets of the LS are: (1) enhancing students’ cooperative learning activities during
discussion, and (2) making the students accustomed to group discussion and material presentation. Firstly, the students
were still confused in conducting group discussion. Most of them did not know what they had to do and felt
unmotivated in using English as a medium of communication. As a result, most groups were dominated by particular
students. A lesson study -based action was taken, individual works which then support the group discussion result was
given to the students. No one in the group was silent and neglected. Each student had the same responsibility to fulfill
the task. Consequently, all of the students contributed to the group activity. In short, the students were motivated to do
group discussion through cooperative learning.
289
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), volume 109
covered four basic principles that made it order to have the kind of interchange necessary
successful in delivering material (Kagan, 1994); to accomplish the task. A group discussion
they were called : positive interdependence, provided a great chance of students’ talking
individual accountability, equal participation, time. In a group of six students there were six
simultaneous interaction and social skills participants practicing language; within thirty
In relation to positive students in the class the participation of group
interdependence, it was a sense of working discussion increased significantly because
together for a assigned task and caring about simultaneous interaction between students of
each other’ learning. Students were placed on various abilities and background gave more
the same side, they should do the assignment students’ talking time. It was important for the
hand in hand. Within cooperative learning students to have sufficient social skills
condition, students had to ensure that all involving learning of communication, trust and
members of the group learned the assigned conflict resolution skills so that they could
material and each of them was responsible to cooperate effectively.
complete the task with a help from the others. Through cooperative group
When positive interdependence was clearly discussion, the students were trained to express
understood, each member of the group was their ideas to other members and to respect the
required to give a unique contribution to make opinion of others. Thus it would be beneficial
the joint effort for group success. for both sides for those who have high or low
The second principle was individual abilities. Those who have low skills would be
accountability which provided for each assisted as they interact with having higher
member believing that it was important for skills. On the other hand those who have higher
her/him to learn the material. Each team skills would feel satisfied as they could help
member had responsibility of their own and their peers.
their teammates’ learning and made an active
constribution to the group. To satisfy the 3. Lesson Study for Language Teaching
principle of individual accountability, students Lesson study derives from a Japanese
must perform on their own task to accomplish word jugyokenkyu, which means a systematic
the group assignment. A teacher must have a process used by Japanese teachers to examine
way of determining what each individual had the effectiveness of their teaching to improve
learned as well as what the group had the students’ engagement in teaching learning
accomplished. process and the learning outcome. Each cycle of
The third principle was equal lesson study (LS) is implemented in three stages
participation. When cooperative learning was which are planning, doing and seeing/reflecting.
applied, the students were provided abundant In LS, there are at least two teachers who
verbal, face-to-face interaction in which they perform as a teacher model and a teacher
discussed, explained, argued and linked the collaborator. They usually meet together
learning material with what they had learned regularly to design collaboratively the teaching
previously. The interaction among the students material and its learning media with the chosen
was carefully designed so there was no member technique which is done in the classroom. After
feeling free from doing the task. Each group designing a lesson plan, the teacher model
member should be actively involved as each of implement it in the classroom and the
them had equal participation to give a real collaborator observes the activity of students
contribution on doing the assignment, then there during teaching learning process. Finally they
was no one member who did most (or all) of the do reflection and discussion on the observed
work. lesson to get some feedback to improve
The last principle was simultaneous instruction.
interaction and social skills. In making group In this study LS was implemented in
discussion, students needed to be clustered five cycles in one semester, which involved one
together in a tight group, facing each other in teacher model and two teacher collaborators.
290
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), volume 109
The focus of this LS was to make students able EFL classroom in this study was designed by
to improve their learning quality to achieve applying cooperative learning activities.
good outcome through cooperative learning. By Cooperative activities tended to integrate the
using this method, students were provided some study of learning material, the language use in
activities to work in groups and able to develop communication and create powerful learning
both their knowledge and communication ability opportunities. The findings that supported the
among the class members. questions in this study favored cooperative
The principle of LS coincide with the learning as a powerful instructional method to
idea that learning is a social and situated enhance the students’ cooperation in terms of
process; and for teachers, they can improve their positive interdependence, individual account-
teaching instruction in the classroom. Some ability, equal participation, simultaneous
benefits can be taken from the implementation interaction and social skills. In a group
of LS for the teacher model, teacher discussion, team members were assigned to
collaborators and mostly for the students. present the material and communicate the
Through LS, the teacher model can explore and discussed subject to the class members in good
develop creativity in teaching, especially in English. Thus, cooperative learning could
implementing the teaching techniques and achieve the positive effects in language
strategies and the way how to motivate the acquisition as well as enhancing motivation
students to learn in order to do the best of their toward learning English. Likewise, the low-
study. In the other hand for the teacher competence and high-competence students
collaborators, they can make a good use of their might be hand in hand to display their oral
observation. They get some experiences and performance. Taken as a whole, the findings of
knowledge how to teach with different ways. this study revealed some advantages for English
Trough observation, they can see some strengths language classroom, namely, group work
and weeknesses of a certain action in teaching generated interactive language, promoted
learning process in the classroom that can be students’ responsibility and autonomy and also
discussed in doing reflection. Moreover, this group work could be used for individualized
collaborative team work make them able to instructions.
select the appropriate learning and teaching
strategies. The other benefit is addressed to References
students; they have some experiences in doing
Brown, H. Douglas. (2001). Teaching by Principles:
collaborative learning, as mentioned before. The
An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd
students could help hand in a hand with the
ed). NY : Prentice Hall Regents
other members in groups to comprehend the
learning material and make personal interaction Gutierez, Sally Baricaua. (2015). Collaborative
in using the language. They would be the active Professional learning through Lesson Study:
participants to accomplish group assignment; Identifying the Challenges of Inquiry-based teaching.
they are able to interactive with group members Journal in Educational Research. Available on line at
and appreciate the others’ existence to be Http://www.iier.org.au/iier 25/gutierez.pdf. accessed
autonomous learners. As a whole, students find on 5 September 2017.
their way to build social and collaborative
communication with others. Johnson, D,& Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperative and
Competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN:
Interaction Book Company.
4. Conclusion.
Based on this study, specifically in Kagan, Spencer. (1994).Cooperative Learning. San
cooperative learning context, there were many Clements, CA : Kagan Publishing.
interactive tasks that naturally improved the
Kagan, S, Kagan, M. & Kagan, L. (2000) Reaching
students’ knowledge, language use and social
English/Language Arts Standards through Cooperative
interaction skills. The implementation of LS in
Learning: Providing for ALL Learners in General
291
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), volume 109
292