References

B
elland, C;
B
elland, A and Price
,T
.
(1971)
.
A
nalysing
Teacher Questions a
Comparative Evaluation of Two Observation Syst
ems
.
New
York
: American
Educational Research Association.
131
Bloom
, Benjamin S.
(ed.)
(1956)
.
Tax
onomy of educational objectives
: the
clas
sification of educational goals,
Handbook I, Cognitive domain
.
New
York:
David McKay
.
Caram, Chris A.
and D
avis
, Pat
sy B. (2005)
.
Inviting Stud
ent Engagement with
Questioning.
Kappa Delta Pi Record
,
42
(
1
),
18
-
23.
Feldman
, Samdra (2003)
.
The Right Line of Questioning.
Teaching Pre k
-
8
; 33
(
4
),
8
.
Harris
, Robin Lee (2000)
.
Batting 1,000: Questioning Techniques in Stude
nt
-
Centred
Classrooms,
The Clear
ing House
, 74
(
1
),
25
-
26
.
House, Beverley M; Chassie
, Marilyn B and
Spohn
, Betty Bowling
(1990)
Questioning:
An Essential I
n
gredient in Effective Teaching.
The Journal of Continuing
Education in Nursing
;
21
(
5
)
,
196
-
201
.
Krathworhl
, David R.
(2002)
.
A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview
.
Theory into Practice
,
41(4)
,
212
-
218.
Morse
, Kevin R
and
Davis
, O. L., Jr. (1970
)
.
The Questioning Strategies Observation
System (QSOS).
Texas
: Austin University
Research and Dev
elopment Center
for Teacher Education.
Volger
, Kenneth E. (2005)
.
Improve Your Verbal Questioning
.
The Clearing House: A
Journal of Educational Strategies
, Issues and Ideas, 79(
2
),
98
-
103.
Wajnryb
, Ruth
(19
92)
.
Classroom Observation Tasks.
Cambridge:
Cambr
idge
University Press.
Wallace
, Michael J. (1998)
.
Action Research for Language Teachers
.
Cambridge
:
Cambridge
University
Press
 . 1ntroduction When teaching English as a foreign language, or any language for
that matter, it isimportant for the teacher to ta*e the time to observe, research
and reflect on their teaching and learning methods. 6y doing this, he'she can
improve his'her s*ills andma*e teaching and learning more fun for both themselves
and their students. 4s outlined by Wa7nryb ( !!-: 89 16ER p.-!%, the reflective
model of research is thatthe teacherr is actively reflecting and exploring, the
concept of learning is theconstruction of personal meaning and that
teachers themselves are the primaryinitiators of their own developme nt.
Each wor*ing day is a new opportunity for a teacher to improve his'her
teaching abilities through observing and conducting the correct research. When
considering this particular case study six and its problem of motivatingadvanced level
students to do writing activities, 1 thin* it is important to highlight thatwriting differs in
some significant ways to do with the purpose of writing in the class andin everyday
life, and the relationship between these two settings. (;c<onough and =haw !!/:
50%-. 2opulation )he population which 1 will use for my particular case study are ten
upper$intermediatestudents. )hey are preparing to sit a 6- exam, according to
the ommon European8ramewor* of References for >anguage. )he particular exam
which they wish to do isthe 8irst ertificate Examination held by ambridge
9niversity. 4ll students are either studying full$time at the 9niversity of ?a@n or have
finished university and are currentlyunemployed. )hus, the university students require
more than a 6 certificate to holdtheir university degree, while the unemployed
students require a minimum of a 6 titlefor better 7ob prospects and opportunities. )he
students all obtained the 6 2reliminaryEnglish )est ( ambridge% in ?uly -A 0 and
wish to continue improving their English tofurther their chances of good employment in
the future. &ut of the ten students, five arestudying or already are play$school
teachers, four are primary school teachers and oneis a secondary school teacher. )he
students who are currently unemployed are also
6