Annex 1

Monitoring and Evaluation Tool

LIST OF TEACHERS
Competency-Based Instruction (1-4) - Learning Competency

Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Last Name First Name MI 100% 75-99% 50-74% Below 50%
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Competency-Based Instruction (5-7) - Exhibits

Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Last Name First Name MI All Many Few None
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Implementation of Constructivist (11-13) - Constructivist Classroom Instruction

Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometim Never
(80- es (0%)
(100%) 99%) (79%-
Last Name First Name MI below))
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
21st Century Skills in Instruction (Nos. 17-18)

Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometim Never
(80- es (0%)
(100%) 99%) (79%-
Last Name First Name MI below))
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Differentiation of Classroom Instruction (Nos. 19-21)
19. No. and percent of teachers who profile students in all their classes according to multiple intelligences
(visual, auditory, tactile) and ability level (fast, average, slow)
Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometim Never
(80- es (0%)
(100%) 99%) (79%-
Last Name First Name MI below))
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Differentiation of Classroom Instruction (Nos. 19-21)

20. No. and percent of teachers who ____differentiate instruction according to multiple intelligences
Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometim Never
(80- es (0%)
(100%) 99%) (79%-
Last Name First Name MI below))
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Differentiation of Classroom Instruction (Nos. 19-21)

21. No. and percent of teachers who ____differentiate instruction according to ability level
Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometim Never
(80- es (0%)
(100%) 99%) (79%-
Last Name First Name MI below))
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool

Differentiation of Classroom Instruction

Subject:

Last Name First Name learners in the 1st failed learners in the 1st
quarter who received quarter who passed in
interventions the 2nd quarter
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
ool

ction

Grd/Yr. Level:

learners who failed learners in the failed learners in the 2nd learners who
failed in the 2nd 2nd quarter who quarter who passed in failed in the third
quarter received interventions the 3rd quarter quarter
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
List of Teachers
Differentiation of Classroom Instruction

Subject:

Last Name First Name

conducted home visits conducted home visits

or conferences with or conferences with
parents of all learners parents of all learners
who are at risk of who failed in their
getting a failing grade subject/s
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
ool

ction

Grd/Yr. Level:

provided
remedial
instruction to
students who provided remedial
failed in their instruction to students
classes in the who failed in their offered alternative
first quarter, classes in the second delivery mode of offered
including those quarter, including instruction as differentiated
who are at risk those who are at risk intervention to failures assessment as
of failing in the of failing in the third requiring such intervention to
second quarter quarter intervention failures
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Implementation of Curriculum contextualization/ localization (Nos. 36-37)

Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometim Never
(80- es (0%)
(100%) 99%) (79%-
Last Name First Name MI below))
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Implementation of Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task (Nos. 38-39)
Plans before Teaching
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometim Never
(80- es (0%)
(100%) 99%) (79%-
Last Name First Name MI below))
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 40-41)
Complete daily lessons from presentation to evaluation and assignment
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Last Name First Name MI Always Often (80- Sometimes Never
(100%) 99%) (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:
NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 42-43)
Leave seat works or collaborative tasks to student groups in a class when on official business or personal leave.
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Last Name First Name MI Always Often (80- Sometimes Never
(100%) 99%) (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:
NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 44-45)
Report to their classes on time and facilitate each class throughout the whole period.
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Last Name First Name MI Always Often (80- Sometimes Never
(100%) 99%) (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:
NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 46-51)
Report to their classes on time and facilitate each class throughout the whole period.
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
maximizes class period by maximizes class period by maximizes class period by
establishing quick and systematic establishing quick and establishing proactive
routines in checking attendance, systematic routines in classroom discipline to avoid
absences, and cutting classes distributing misbehavior
Last Name First Name MI worksheets/materials and
submission of outputs
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:
NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 52-53)
Schedule co- and extra-curricular activities outside class hours
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
School Name MI Always Often (80- Sometimes Never
(100%) 99%) (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:
NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 54-55)
Provide substitute teachers when other teachers are on leave for more than a day
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
School Name MI Always Often (80- Sometimes Never
(100%) 99%) (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:
NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 56-57)
Report to their classes on time and facilitate each class throughout the whole period.
Grd/Yr. Level:
A. B. C. D. E.
Last Name First Name MI Independent Instructional Instructional Frustration Non Reader
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:
NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 58-60)
Conduct remedial reading program
Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Last Name First Name MI Always Often (80- Sometimes Never
(100%) 99%) (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:
NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 61-62)
Conducted ORV at least twice in a quarter (monthly)

Name of School
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool

10 Implementation of reading program—Phil-IRI for intermediate and secondary grades (by grade level)

Grd/Yr. Level:
SLOW AVERAGE FAST FRUSTRATION INSTRUCTIONAL INDEPENDENT
Last Name First Name MI
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 69-71)
Provide substitute teachers when other teachers are on leave for more than a day
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Name of Teachers Always Often (80- Sometimes Never
(100%) 99%) (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:
NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 72-73)
Provide substitute teachers when other teachers are on leave for more than a day
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
School Name MI Always Often (80- Sometimes Never
(100%) 99%) (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:
NOTED BY: