Sei sulla pagina 1di 13

This pdf of Tools, Textiles and Contexts belongs to the publishers Oxbow

Books and it is their copyright.

As author you are licenced to make up to 50 offprints from it, but


beyond that you may not publish it on the World Wide Web until
three years from publication (October 2018), unless the site is a limited
access intranet (password protected). If you have queries about this
please contact the editorial department at Oxbow Books (editorial@
oxbowbooks.com).
Tools, Textiles and Contexts
We dedicate this book to Betchen Barber,
the pioneer of the study of Aegean Bronze Age textiles.
an offprint from
ANCIENT TEXTILES SERIES VOL. 21

Tools, Textiles and Contexts


Investigating Textile Production in the Aegean
and Eastern Mediterranean Bronze Age

Hardcover Edition: ISBN 978-1-84217-472-2


Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-78297-051-4

edited by
Eva Andersson Strand and Marie-Louise Nosch
with the editorial and analytical assistance of Joanne Cutler

© Oxbow Books 2015


Oxford & Philadelphia
www.oxbowbooks.com
Published in the United Kingdom in 2015 by
OXBOW BOOKS
10 Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford OX1 2EW

and in the United States by


OXBOW BOOKS
908 Darby Road, Havertown, PA 19083

© Oxbow Books and the individual authors 2015

Hardcover Edition: ISBN 978-1-84217-472-2


Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-78297-051-4

A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Tools, textiles and contexts : textile production in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean Bronze
Age / edited by Eva Andersson Strand and Marie-Louise Nosch.
pages cm. -- (Ancient textiles series; vol. 21)
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 978-1-84217-472-2 (hardback)
1. Bronze age--Middle East. 2. Textile fabrics, Prehistoric--Middle East. 3. Neolithic period--
Middle East. 4. Bronze age--Aegean Islands (Greece and Turkey) 5. Neolithic period--Aegean
Islands (Greece and Turkey) 6. Middle East--Antiquities. 7. Aegean Islands (Greece and Turkey)-
-Antiquities. I. Strand, Eva B. Andersson, editor. II. Nosch, Marie-Louise, editor.
GN778.32.N4T66 2015
939.4--dc23
2015027222

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage
and retrieval system, without permission from the publisher in writing.

Printed in Malta by Melita Press Ltd

For a complete list of Oxbow titles, please contact:

UNITED KINGDOM
Oxbow Books
Telephone (01865) 241249, Fax (01865) 794449
Email: oxbow@oxbowbooks.com
www.oxbowbooks.com

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


Oxbow Books
Telephone (800) 791-9354, Fax (610) 853-9146
Email: queries@casemateacademic.com
www.casemateacademic.com/oxbow

Oxbow Books is part of the Casemate Group

Front cover: clockwise: MM II Quartier Mu, Malia, Crete, map (after Poursat 1996, pl. 81),
spindle whorls from Phaistos, Crete (courtesy of P. Militello), Khania, Crete, Late Bronze Age
ribbon, reconstructed loom weights in TTTC experiments.
Back cover: Splicing (drawing: Annika Jeppsson)
Contents

Introduction.........................................................................................................................................................................................vii

Chapter 1  Research history


1.1 An introduction to the investigation of archaeological textile tools.................................................................................1
Lorenz Rahmstorf
1.2 An introduction to experimental archaeology and textile research................................................................................ 25
Linda Olofsson

Chapter 2  The basics of textile tools and textile technology – from fibre to fabric........................................................ 39
Eva Andersson Strand

Chapter 3  Survey of archaeological textile remains from the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean area..................... 61
Irene Skals, Susan Möller-Wiering and Marie-Louise Nosch

Chapter 4  The TTTC experiments


4.1 Experimental testing of Bronze Age textile tools............................................................................................................ 75
Linda Olofsson, Eva Andersson Strand and Marie-Louise Nosch
4.2 External examination of spinning and weaving samples................................................................................................101
Susan Möller-Wiering
4.3 Test of loom weights and 2/2 twill weaving....................................................................................................................119
Linda Olofsson and Marie-Louise Nosch
4.4 Weaving with crescent shaped loom weights. An investigation of a special kind of loom weight.........................127
Agnete Wisti Lassen
4.5 From tools to textiles, concluding remarks.......................................................................................................................139
Eva Andersson Strand

Chapter 5  The TTTC database


5.1 Introduction to the CTR database......................................................................................................................................145
Eva Andersson Strand and Marie-Louise Nosch
5.2 Mathematical analysis of the spindle whorl and loom weight data in the CTR database.........................................153
Richard Firth
vi Contents

Chapter 6  Textile tools in contexts


6.1 Textile tools and textile production – studies of selected Bronze Age sites: introduction.......................................191
Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
6.2 Textile tools from Khania, Crete, Greece..........................................................................................................................197
Maria Bruun-Lundgren †, Eva Andersson Strand and Birgitta P. Hallager
6.3 Textile tools from Ayia Triada, Crete, Greece..................................................................................................................207
Pietro Militello, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
6.4 Textile tools from Phaistos, Crete, Greece........................................................................................................................215
Pietro Militello, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
6.5 Textile tools from Quartier Mu, Malia, Crete, Greece....................................................................................................229
Jean-Claude Poursat, Françoise Rougemont, Joanne Cutler, Eva Andersson Strand and Marie-Louise Nosch
6.6 Textile tools from Akrotiri, Thera, Greece.......................................................................................................................243
Iris Tzachili, Stella Spantidaki, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
6.7 Textile tools from Midea, mainland Greece......................................................................................................................247
Katie Demakopoulou, Ioannis Fappas, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
6.8 Textile production at Mycenae, mainland Greece............................................................................................................253
Iphiyenia Tournavitou, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
6.9 Textile tools from Tiryns, mainland Greece.....................................................................................................................267
Lorenz Rahmstorf, Małgorzata Siennicka, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
6.10 Textile tools from Thebes, mainland Greece....................................................................................................................279
Maria Emanuela Alberti, Vassilis Aravantinos, Ioannis Fappas, Athina Papadaki, Françoise Rougemont,
Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
6.11 Textile tools from Archontiko, northern Greece.............................................................................................................293
Evi Papadopoulou, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
6.12 Textile tools from Sitagroi, northern Greece....................................................................................................................299
Ernestine S. Elster, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
6.13 Textile tools from Troia, western Anatolia........................................................................................................................309
Marta Guzowska, Ralf Becks, Eva Andersson Strand, Joanne Cutler and Marie-Louise Nosch
6.14 Textile tools from Apliki, Cyprus.......................................................................................................................................329
Joanna S. Smith, Joanne Cutler, Eva Andersson Strand and Marie-Louise Nosch
6.15 Textile tools from Kition, Cyprus.......................................................................................................................................337
Joanna S. Smith, Joanne Cutler, Eva Andersson Strand and Marie-Louise Nosch
6.16 Textile tools from Tel Kabri, Israel....................................................................................................................................347
Assaf Yasur-Landau, Nurith Goshen, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler

Chapter 7  Summary of results and conclusions....................................................................................................................351


Eva Andersson Strand and Marie-Louise Nosch

Appendices
Appendix A: Textile remains in the Eastern Mediterranean area: Neolithic and Chalcolithic.....................................385
Appendix B: Textile remains in the Eastern Mediterranean area: Bronze Age..............................................................392

Acknowledgements...........................................................................................................................................................................402
Chapter 6.11

Textile tools from Archontiko,


northern Greece
Evi Papadopoulou, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch
and Joanne Cutler

Archontiko is a tell settlement, situated in Papanthimou et al. 2003; Papadopoulou et al.


northern Greece. Systematic excavation at 2010; Papanthimou and Papadopoulou in
Fig. 6.11.1. House A the site has brought to light three successive press). House interiors were equipped with
(from west). Detail of building horizons that belong to the Early various types of clay features, namely storage
its interior. A group of Bronze Age period. The earliest one, Phase bins and thermal structures, that were preserved
clay storage bins and IV, is dated to 2135–2020 BC and has yielded in good condition (Papaefthymiou et al. 2007).
some thermal structures seven oblong post-framed houses that were Phase IV strata were uncovered over an area of
characterise its fixed destroyed by a fire incident which produced 220 m2 and yielded 160 artifacts related to textile
equipment (photo: rich archaeological deposits often containing production. Spindle whorls, loom weights and
Papanthimou and Pilali contexts of closed finds (Papaefthymiou- rounded sherds constitute the basic textile tool
2003, 26–27).
categories.
The tools recorded in the TTTC database
originate from a Phase IV building, House A, and
constitute a closed assemblage representative of
domestic textile production at EBA Archontiko
(Fig. 6.11.1)
Although only partially excavated, House
A yielded a total of 33 textile tools, namely 27
loom weights and six spindle whorls that were
collected from a surface area of c. 23 m2 (Fig.
6.11.2).

Spindle whorls and spinning


The six recorded spindle whorls from House A
(four conical, one flattened biconical and one
cylindrical) vary in weight from 25 g to 68 g,
indicating that the Archontiko spinners could
have spun different types of yarn by choosing
294 Evi Papadopoulou, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler

different whorls (Figs. 6.11.3 and 6.11.4). The 6.11.5). There is, however, one example that is
yarn, according to the results of the spinning a naturally perforated irregular pebble. Twenty-
tests, would generally be quite thick, however three of the loom weights had a recordable
(see chapters 2 and 4.1). weight and thickness; their weight varies from
154 g to 1179 g and their thickness varies from
4.1 cm to 8.8 cm (Fig. 6.11.6).
Loom weights and weaving Twelve loom weights (11 clay weights and
Fig. 6.11.2. Textile tools Twenty-six of the recorded loom weights from the naturally perforated pebble) were found
from House A, EBA, House A are pyramidal truncated in shape and near a clay storage bin at the eastern end of the
Phase IV, by type and are made of clay (17 are made of fired clay, five house (Trench ID-Y). The weight of the clay
context. of unfired clay and four are unspecified) (Fig. loom weights varies from 220 g to 337 g and
the thickness from 4.1 cm to 5.8 cm (Fig. 6.11.4)
These loom weights could all be used in the same
  Spindle whorl Loom weight Total setup, with thread needing c. 15–20 g tension.
Trench IG, House A 4 8 12 Used in a tabby weave with thread requiring
Trench IG-ID, House A   1 1 c. 15 g tension, the resulting fabric would have
Trench IG-P, House A 2 2 4 c. 6–9 warp threads per centimetre; with thread
Trench ID, House A   4 4 needing c. 20 g tension, the thread count would
Trench ID-Y, House A   12 12 be c. 4–7 threads per centimetre (Fig. 6.11.7).
Total 6 27 33 However, in a balanced weave the finished
textile would have been open, and it is therefore
likely that the textile would have been weft
faced. These loom weights could also have been
used for producing different types of twills,
with a resulting denser fabric (approximately
double the thread count of a tabby weave).
Even this fabric would have been quite open if
balanced, and it is likely that the textile would
Fig. 6.11.3. Spindle have been slightly weft faced. If this group of
whorls, EBA, Phase IV, loom weights was used in the same tabby setup,
House A (photo: courtesy with six loom weights in the front row and six
of E. Papadopoulou). loom weights in the back row, the width of the

Fig. 6.11.4. Spindle


whorls, EBA, Phase IV,
House A: context and
weight/diameter.
6.11  Textile tools from Archontiko, northern Greece 295

fabric would have been c. 26.5 cm, which has to or more; the four loom weights from Trench
be considered as a narrow fabric. If producing ID, located at the east part of the house would
a twill fabric with four rows of loom weights, also only work well with thread requiring c. 40
the width would be only c. 13.2 cm. g tension or more.
A group of eight loom weights was recovered
near the centre of the house (Trench IG). They Summary
have a heavier weight and larger thickness Fig. 6.11.5. Pyramidal
than the loom weights from Trench ID-Y The number of tools from Archontiko loom weights, EBA,
(Fig. 6.11.6). Seven of the loom weights vary presented in this chapter is small, but the 33 Phase IV, House
in weight from 468 g to 600 g and have a objects recorded reveal a considerable diversity A (Trench ID-Y)
thickness of 5.5–6.3 cm. The eighth loom in the textile production. The same picture also (photo: courtesy of E.
weight weighs 1134 g and is 8.3 cm thick, and emerges from the study of the textile toolkits Papadopoulou).
would not have functioned optimally with the
other weights in the same loom setup. The
seven loom weights would all function with
thread needing c. 20 g to 50 g tension (Fig.
6.11.8). In a tabby weave with thread requiring
c. 20 g tension, the warp thread count would
be c. 8–11 threads per centimetre, whereas with
thread needing c. 50 g tension the thread count
would be c. 3–4 threads per centimetre (in a
twill the thread count would be approximately
double). In both a tabby and a twill weave, the
fabrics could have been quite balanced. The
total thickness of the loom weights is 41.3 cm.
In a tabby setup with eight loom weights with a
similar weight and thickness (four in the front
row and four in the back row), the width of
the fabric would be a minimum of 23.6 cm,
which has to be considered as a narrow fabric.
The heavier loom weight weighing 1134 g could
only function with yarn needing c. 40 g tension

Fig. 6.11.6. Loom


weights, EBA, Phase
IV, House A: context
and weight/thickness.
296 Evi Papadopoulou, Eva Andersson Strand, Marie-Louise Nosch and Joanne Cutler
Fig. 6.11.7. Loom Warp thr/cm 10 g N=9 15 g, N=11 20 g, N=11 25 g, N=9 30 g, N=6 35 g, N=1
weights, EBA, Phase
IV, House A, Trench 3 thr            
ID-Y: weight tension/ 4 thr     1 3 5 1
number of threads per 5 thr     4 5 1  
cm in a tabby. The total 6 thr   1 3 1    
number of analysed loom 7 thr   5 3      
weights is 11. 8 thr   3        
9 thr 1 2        
10 thr 1          
11 thr 3          
12 thr 3          
13 thr 1          

Warp thr/cm 20 g, N=7 25 g, N=7 30 g, N=7 35 g, N=7 40 g, N=7 45 g, N=7 50 g, N=7 55 g, N=2 60 g, N=2
3 thr             3   1
4 thr         3 6 4 2 1
5 thr     2 5 4 1      
6 thr   2 4 2          
7 thr   2 1            
8 thr 3 2              
9 thr 1 1              
10 thr 2                
11 thr 1                

Fig. 6.11.8. Loom recovered from other contemporaneous shape. As far as the material and the surface
weights, EBA, Phase houses belonging to Phase IV as well as from treatment there is some diversity, since the light
IV, House A, Trench the two successive EBA Phases II and III group consists of fired and polished weights,
IG: weight tension/ (Papadopoulou 2012; 2002, unpublished). whereas the other two categories are mainly
number of threads per The yarns produced with the spindle whorls made of unfired clay and are burnished. Four
cm in a tabby. The total
number of analysed loom
would have been suitable for several types of of the six spindle whorls were of the same type
weights is seven. fabrics, as suggested by the analyses of the and shape. This fact does not seem coincidental,
loom weights. and suggests considerable knowledge of how to
For example, the thread spun with the produce textiles in an optimal way.
whorls weighing 55 g or more would have The textile production in Archontiko
probably functioned very well in the weaves appears to have been well developed. The
with the heavy loom weights weighing more spinners and weavers knew how different
than 900 g. The result would have been a types of tools affected the final products and
coarse textile with few but thick threads per also the tools themselves were well made. The
centimetre. The spindle whorls weighing analysis of the spindle whorls demonstrates
between 25–40 g would have been optimal for that the spinners spun different types of yarn;
producing yarn that needed c. 20 g tension or the variation within the loom weights and the
more on the loom. variation within the spindle whorls indicate
The majority of the tools are considered to that the people of Archontiko produced many
have been made in a good production quality. different types of textiles with both thin and
The majority of the loom weights (except for thick threads and in balanced, open and/or
the stone weight) are of the same type regarding weft faced weaves.
6.11  Textile tools from Archontiko, northern Greece 297

Bibliography houses and ‘households’ at Archontiko Giannitson,


Papadopoulou, E. (2002, unpublished) Clay Small Finds To Αρχαιολογικό Έργο στη Μακεδονία και Θράκη, 15
from Archontiko Giannitson. Master thesis, Aristotle (2001), 461–470.
University of Thessaloniki. Papaefthymiou, A., Pilali, A. and Papadopoulou, E. (2007)
Papadopoulou, E. (2012) Textile technology in northern Les installations culinaires dans un village du Bronze
Greece: evidence for a domestic craft industry from Ancien en Grèce du nord: Archontiko Giannitsa, in
Early Bronze Age Archontiko, in Nosch, M.-L. and Mee, C. and Renard, J. (eds), Cooking Up the Past: Food
Laffineur, R. (eds), KOSMOS. Jewellery, Adornment and Culinary Practices in the Neolithic and Bronze Age
and Textiles in the Aegean Bronze Age, 57–63. Liège. Aegean, 136–147. Oxford. Oxbow Books.
Université de Liège. Papanthimou, A. and Papadopoulou, E. (in press)
Papadopoulou, E., Papanthimou, A. and Maniatis, Y. The Early Bronze Age in Macedonia: the evidence
(2010) Issues of spatial organization at the end of the from Archontiko Giannitson, in Doumas, C. G.,
Early Bronze Age: the new evidence from Archontiko Giannikouri, A. and Kouka, O. (eds), The Aegean Early
Giannitson, To Αρχαιολογικό Έργο στη Μακεδονία και Bronze Age: New Evidence. Athens. Ministry of Culture
Θράκη, 21 (2007), 77–82. and Archaeological Institute of Aegean Studies.
Papaefthymiou-Papanthimou, A., Pilali-Papasteriou, Papanthimou, K. and Pilali, A. (2003) The Prehistoric
A., Giagoulis, T., Basogianni, D., Papadopoulou, E., Settlement at Archontiko Giannitson. Giannitsa. Prefecture
Tsagaraki, E. and Fappas, I. (2003) Early Bronze Age of Giannitsa.

Potrebbero piacerti anche