Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CLASSIFICATION OF FALLACIES
A. Formal Fallacy- These are invalid arguments. The arguments where the concluding statement
does not necessarily follow from the statements preceding it. It is on the matter of form and
structure of an argument. The concluding statement may actually be objectively true, but it’s
truth does not depend on or follow from the other statement. (www.triviumpursuit.com)
B. Informal Fallacy- The content of the language used is fallacious. This type is more dependent
on the misuse of language and evidence and more prevalent in everyday uses of language.
(rses.lumenlearning.com)
Types of Informal Fallacies
Fallacies of relevance. Fallacies of relevance are the most numerous and
the most frequently encountered. In these fallacies, the premises of the argument are simply not
relevant to the conclusion. However, because they are made
to appear to be relevant, they may deceive.
• R1: The appeal to the populace • R5: The attack on the person
• R2: The appeal to emotion • R6: The appeal to force
• R3: The red herring • R7: Missing the point (irrelevant
• R4: The straw man conclusion)
D3. Argument non Causa pro Causa(False Cause)- A fallacy in which something that is not
really the cause of something else is treated as its cause. The argument mistakenly attempt to
establish a causal connection.
A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc(after this, therefore because of this)- the fallacy in arguing that
one event was caused by another event merely because it occurred after that
event.(https.philosophy.lander.edu)
Example:
Since hair always precedes the growth of teeth in babies, the growth of teeth causes the
growth of teeth.
B. Slippery Slope- A fallacy in which change in a particular direction is asserted to lead
inevitably to further changes (usually undesirable) in the same direction.
Example:
If we allow gay marriage, the next thing we know, people will want to marry their dogs, or
their cats, or even their pigs.
D4. Hasty Generalization- A fallacy of defective induction in which one moves carelessly
from a single case, or a very few cases, to a largescale generalization about all or most cases.
It arises when someone illegitimately generalize from a nonrepresentative sample which is
usually the source of many stereotypes. (lucidphilisophy.com)
Example:
The car that just cut me off is from South Dakota, so all South Dakotans are jerks.
V. FALLACIES OD AMBIGUITY
An informal fallacy caused by a shift or a confusion in the meanings of words or
phrases within an argument (sophisms).
A1. Equivocation- A fallacy in which two or more meanings of a word or phrase are
used, accidentally or deliberately, in different parts of an argument. It occurs when a key
term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning and then
another meaning in another portion of the argument. (www.txstate.edu)
Example:
I have the right to watch “The Real World”. Therefore it’s right for me to watch the
show.
A3. Accent- A fallacy of ambiguity that occurs when an argument contains a premise that
relies on one possible emphasis of certain words, but the conclusion relies on a different
emphasis that gives those same words a different meaning.
Example:
In an interrogation where a police officer asks the suspect if why he shot the clerk. The
suspect responded in shock “I shot the clerk? I shot the clerk?” Later, the officer
interpreted it as a confession, “I shot the clerk!” instead that the suspect is asking if he
shot the clerk.