Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
257
258 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
'injected' or 'irreducible' is used, it should few distinct letters used from other alphabets, if
appear first in subscript order (but after r for carefully made, should be self-explanatory. It is
'relative'). Examples: Big, formation important to select a type face that has italic
volume factor of injected gas; Cig, compress- forms, and clearly distinguished upper case,
ibility of injected gas. lower case and small capitals. Only type faces
3. Except for Cases 1 and 2 above (and with serifs are recommended.
symbols Kh and Lv), phase, composition and
E. Remarks. Quantity symbols may be used in
system subscripts should generally appear
first in subscript order. Examples: Bgi, mathematical expressions in any way consistent
initial or original gas formation volume with good mathematical usage. The product of
factor; B oi , initial or original oil formation two quantities is indicated by writing abo The
quotient may be indicated by writing
volume factor; CO,i' initial or original ox-
ygen concentration; B li , initial or original a
-,alb or ab- 1
total system formation volume factor; PsE, b
density of solid particles making up ex-
perimental pack; also FaH G Lp' G wgp , G Fi' If more than one solidus is used in any
4. Abbreviation subscripts (such as 'ext', 'lim', algebraic term, parentheses must be inserted to
'max', 'min'), when applied to a symbol remove any ambiguity. Thus, one may write
already subscripted, should appear last in (a/b)/c, or a/bc, but not alb/c.
subscript order and require that the basic
symbol and its initial subscript(s) be first F. Special notes. Observe the following:
enclosed in parentheses. Examples: (ia)max, 1. When the mobilities involved are on oppo-
(Shr)min' site sides of an interface, the mobility ratio
5. Except for Case 4 above, numerical sub- will be defined as the ratio of the displacing
scripts should appear last in subscript order. phase mobility to the displaced phase mobil-
Examples: qoD3, dimensionless oil produc- ity, or the ratio of the upstream mobility to
tion rate during time period 3; PR2, reservoir the downstream mobility.
pressure at time 2; (ial)max, maximum air 2. Abbreviated chemical formulas are used as
injection rate during time period 1. subscripts for paraffin hydrocarbons: C 1 for
6. Except for Cases 4 and 5 above, subscript D methane, C2 for ethane, C3 for propane ...
for 'dimensionless' should usually appear Cn for Cn H 2n + 2 •
last in subscript order. Examples: PID; qoD; 3. Complete chemical formulas are used as
(qoD3)max' subscripts for other materials: CO 2 for
7. Except for Cases 4, 5 and 6 above, the carbon dioxide, CO for carbon monoxide,
following subscripts should usually appear O 2 for oxygen, N2 for nitrogen, etc.
last in subscript order: regions such as bank, 4. The letter R is retained for electrical resistiv-
burned, depleted, front, swept, unburned ity in well logging usage. The symbol P is to
(b, b, d, f, s, u); separation, differential and be used in all other cases and is that
flash (d, f); individual component identifica- preferred by ASA.
tion (i orQI other). Examples: E Db ; Rsf, npJ- 5. The letter C is retained for conductivity in
D. Typography. Letter symbols for physical quan- well logging usage. The symbol (J is to be
tities, and other subscripts and superscripts, used in all other cases and is that preferred
whether upper case, lower case, or in small by ASA.
capitals, when appearing as light-face letters of 6. Dimensions: L = length, m = mass, q =
the English alphabet, are printed in italic electrical charge, t = time, and T = temper-
(sloping) type. Arabic numerals, and letters or ature.
other alphabets used in mathematical express- 7. Dimensionless numbers are criteria for
ions, are normally printed in vertical type. geometric, kinematic and dynamic similarity
When a special alphabet is required, boldface between two systems. They are derived by
type is to be preferred to German, Gothic, or one of three procedures used in methods of
script type. In material to be reproduced in similarity: integral, differential, or dimen-
facsimile, from copy largely typewritten, letters sional. Examples of dimensionless numbers
that would be boldface in print may be indicated are Reynolds number (N Re ) and Prandtl
to be such by special underscoring, while the number (Npr ). For a discussion of methods
262 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
of similarity and dimensionless numbers, see abbreviation. All three character positions
"Methods of Similarity", by R.E. Schilson, must be employed.
J. Pet. Tech. (August, 1964) 877. Fixed characters are utilized in this part of
8. The quantity x can be modified to indicate the notation when heat quantities, indexes
an average or mean value by an overbar, X· and exponents are being assigned computer
symbols. When a heat quantity is denoted,
Principles of computer symbol H appears in the first character position, as
standardization exemplified by thermal conductivity HCN.
A. Symbol Structure. The computer symbols are Indexes such as resistivity index are denoted
structured from four possible parts representing by X in the third character position. Expo-
respectively arithmetic mode, mathematical nents are characterized by XP in the second
operators, basic quantities and subscripts, ex- and third positions, such as porosity expo-
clusive of time and space designations. Each of nentMXP.
these parts has a defined number of characters 4. The fourth part of the notation (subscript
and, when all are used in a single symbol, the field) is used to represent the subscripts of
total length may be ten characters. Example the mathematical letter symbol and normal-
ten-character notations are: ly consists of one of the three character
positions. Computer symbol subscripts are
XDELPRSTQQ,XDELCMPPRD normally designated by using the mathema-
When any of the four parts are not used, the tical letter subscripts of the SPE Symbols
remaining characters are to be right- or left- Standard.
justified to form a string of characters without Though usually not required, more char-
blank positions. acters may be used when necessary for
In practice, the combined notations will not designation of multiple mathematical letter
usually exceed six characters. In those cases subscripts. For example, dimensionless
where the complete computer symbol does average reservoir pressure would be de-
exceed six characters, and the computer lan- noted by PRSA VQ.
guage being used will not allow more than six, a The computer subscript designation is
shortened notation must be employed. The part placed immediately to the right of the
of the notation representing the basic mathema- quantity symbol field with no intervening
tical quantity (letter) symbol should be retained space.
and the other parts of the notation shortened. Dimensionless numbers are denoted by Q
Shortened symbols are no longer standard, and in the last required subscript position. A ver-
therefore must be defined in the text or appen- age, maximum, minimum, extrapolated or
dix as is appropriate. limiting values of a quantity are denoted
respectively by A V, MX, MN, XT, of LM in
1. The first part of the notation consists of one the first two subscript positions; additional
character position to define the arithmetic subscripting occurs immediately to the right
mode of the complete computer symbol. It of these defined notations. Other than in
is suggested that X be used for floating point these cases, the order of subscripting should
variables and I for integers. This notation follow the rules given in the 'Multiple
position should be used only if absolutely Subscripts - Position Order' .
necessary, the preferred approach being the 5. No binding rule is made for the notation of
use of a declaration within the program. space and time subscripts, since the method
2. The second part of the notation (operator of subscripting is often dictated by the
field) consists of three characters and is used characteristics of a particular computer.
for mathematical operators. The notation However, the vital importance of these
should suggest the operation. subscripts makes it necessary to establish a
3. The third part of the notation (quantity standard and require an author to define
symbol field) consisting of three characters, any deviations. The system outlined below
is used to represent the basic mathematical should be used when the subscripts are not
quantity (letter) symbol. The three letter implied by an array location or an index
notation mnemonically denotes the quantity specified by the program logic.
name as closely as possible. This part of the The following sketch indicates the coor-
computer notation is thus of the nature of an dinate system used to denote special posi-
SPE NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS 263
tion in multi-dimensional arrays. measure. Authors are urged to familiarize them-
1(I = 1, 2, 3, ... ,NX) selves with the SI System of units and use them as
much as practical. The choice of units (Trans.
A/ME 263 (1977) 1685) and their designation is,
however, left to the author.
C. Restriction to computer programs. Use of the
computer symbols is restricted to the description
of programming for computers. As a consequ-
ence, the computer symbols must not be used in
works of portions of papers where programming
This convention was adopted so that the is not discussed or as abbreviations in text or
page position of printed output obtained in graphical material.
a normal I, J, K sequence would correspond D. Character set. The computer symbols must be
to position as viewed on maps as normally constructed from the 26 English letters and 10
used in petroleum engineering. Similarly, I, Arabic numerical characters. Each complete
K or J, K sequences would correspond to computer symbol must begin with a letter and
cross-sections as normally used. not a numeral.
The space and time subscripts are con- The computer symbols are always represented
structed by placing a letter code (I, J, K, T) by vertical type in printed text. English capital
before the following symbols: letters and Arabic numerals are used in hand or
typewritten material.
Machine E. Nonstandard symbols. The rules for establishing
Symbol Definition the computer symbols contained in this standard
P2 present location plus 2 are such that quantities not covered can, in most
P3H . present location plus 3/2 instances, be given a notation that is compatible
PI present location plus I with it. Such additional computer symbols are,
PIH present location plus 112 by definition, nonstandard.
MIH present location minus 112 Duplication of computer symbols for quanti-
MI present location minus I ties that can occur simultaneously in an equation
M3H present location minus 3/2
or computer program must be avoided. Elimina-
M2 present location minus 2
tion of a duplication may lead to a computer
symbol that is at variance with the standard; i.e.,
Hence, the subscript for the present time t
a notation that is nonstandard.
would be T, and that for subscript t-2 would be
When nonstandard computer symbols occur in
TM2.
a technical work, they should be clearly defined
If an array contains information correspond-
in the text or appendix, as is appropriate, and in
ing to points halfway between the normally
indexed points, then the convention is to shift the program.
F. Special notes. No computer symbols have been
the plus-direction elements to the node being
defined here for numerical quantities, functions,
indexed.
and arithmetic, relational, or logical operators.
In the following example, the permeability
When employed in programs, their usage should
at the i_lh point would be referenced as
be fully explained by comments in the program
PRMIPIH(I - 1), and that for the Hl/2 point
text. Some of these special cases are noted
would be referenced as PRMIPIH(I). See
sketch below. below:
1. No computer symbols to designate common
i-I Ph H liz or natural logarithms have been estab-
---(0 I 0 lished. Rather, these functions should be
1-1 PRMIPIH(I-l) I PRMIPIH(I) designated by the notations compatible with
the computer system being employed. The
B. Units. Each complete computer symbol repre-
notation used should be defined in the
sents a mathematical letter symbol and its associ-
paper.
ated subscripts. The mathematical letter symbol
2. The computer symbol for dimensionless
in turn designates a physical quantity. Neither
numbers in general (unnamed dimension-
the complete computer symbol nor the mathema-
less numbers) is NUMQ. Named dimen-
tical letter symbol implies any specific units of
264 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
sionless numbers have the mnemonic title designation in Computer Symbols Subscript
designation in the field representing the List. (Only changes in the basic subscripts
quantity and a Q in the last subscript are shown. Combination subscripts that
position employed. Thus, Reynolds number contain these items are also changed accor-
is designated as REYQ. Similarly, Prandtl dingly.)
number could be designated as PRDQ, 2. Quantities represented by single symbol in
Grashof number as GRSQ, Graetz number SPE Letter Symbols Standard but by
as GRTQ. Any dimensionless number not symbol-subscript combination in Computer
contained in this standard should be defined Symbols List.
in the paper.
3. No computer subscript notations corres-
ponding to these mathematical letter sub-
scripts are established. See section G. SPEletter Computer Quantity
4. No mathematical letter subscripts corres- symbol symbol title
pond to these computer subscripts. See G GASTI total inital gas in
section G. place in reservoir
L MOLL moles of liquid phase
G. Permissible format changes. In preparing the N NUMO dimensionless number
computer symbols it became necessary to modify in general
the format of certain of the basic letter symbols, N 01 LTI initial oil in place
subscripts or symbol-subscript combinations. in reservoir
These changes are in accord with the General u VELV volumetric velocity
Principles of Computer Symbol Standardization. (flow rate or flux,
per unit area)
They do not imply that changes in the form of the V M0 LV moles of vapour phase
economics, well logging and formation evalua- W WTRTI initial water in place
tion, reservoir engineering, or natural gas en- in reservoir
gineering letter symbols as contained elsewhere x MFRL mole fraction of
in this SPE Standard are authorized. Rather component in liquid
these changes are shown as a matter of record to phase
prevent confusion and to present examples of y MFRV mole fraction of
permissible format changes in the computer component in vapour
symbols that may be followed when it becomes phase
necessary to construct a computer notation not z MFRM mole fraction of
component in
included in the list. mixture
1. Basic symbolic subscripts of SPE Letter
Symbols Standard represented by different
3. Quantities represented by symbol-subscript
SPEletter Computer combination in SPE Letter Symbols Stan-
subscript symbol Subscript title dard but by a Computer Symbol Notation
c CP capillary only.
D 0 dimensionless quantity
Dm OM dimensionless quantity
at condition m
E EX experiment SPEletter
ext XT extrapolated symbol-
F FU fuel subscript Computer
lim LM limiting value combination symbol Quantity title
m FU fuel (mass of)
max MX maximum HC N thermal conductivity
min
-
MN minimum
p PAV mean or average
pressure 4. Symbol-subscript combinations of SPE Let-
pr PRO pseudo-reduced ter Symbols Standard represented by Com-
r RO reduced puter Symbol-Subscript Notation wherein
tD TQ dimensionless time
subscript notations are not the same.
SPE NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS 265
SPEletter
place of the full name of a quantity, unit, or other
symbol- entity. Abbrevi{ltions are not acceptable in mathe-
subscript Computer Quantity matical equations. SPE provides a list of prefer-
combination symbol title red abbreviations in its 'Style Guide' for authors.
GL N GL TI initial condensate B. Computer Symbols - (for use in computer prog-
liquids in place rams) - a computer symbol is a letter or group of
in reservoir letters and numerals used to represent a specific
G Lp NGLP cumulative condensate physical or mathematical quantity in the writing
liquids produced and execution of computer programs. One com-
NRe REya Reynolds number puter symbol may be employed to represent a
(dimensionless
number) group of quantities, properly defined. Computer
Rsw GWRS gas solubility in water symbols are not acceptable as substitutes for letter
symbols in the required mathematical (equation-
al) developments leading up to computer prog-
5. Subscripts of SPE Letter Symbols Standard rams. At the present time, all SPE computer
not assigned Computer Subscript Notations symbols employ capital letters and numerals.
as a result of actions noted in 4. C. Dimensions - dimensions identify the physical
nature of or the general components making up a
specific physical quantity; SPE employs the five
SPEletter basic dimensions of mass, length, time, tempera-
subscript Subscript title ture, and electrical charge (m, L, t, T, q). *
liquid produced, cumulative D. Letter symbols - (for use in mathematical equa-
(usually with condensate, tions) - a letter symbol is a single letter, modified
G Lp ) when appropriate by one or more subscripts or
Re Reynolds (used with Reynolds superscripts, used to represent a specific physical
number only, N Re )
solution in water (usually with
or mathematical quantity in a mathematical
sw
gas solubility in water, Rsw) equation. A single letter may be employed to
represent a group of quantities, properly de-
fined. The same letter symbol should be used
6. Letter operator-symbol combination of consistently for the same generic quantity, or
SPE Letter Symbols Standard represented special values, being indicated by subscripts or
by Computer Symbol Notation only. superscripts.
E. Reserve symbols - a reserve symbol is a single
SPEletter Computer letter, modified when appropriate by one or
symbol symbol quantity Title more subscripts or superscripts, which can be
used as an alternate when two quantities (occur-
T AC interval transit time ring in some specialized works) have the same
standard letter symbol. These conflicts may
Distinctions between, and descriptions of, result from use of standard SPE symbols or
abbreviations, computer symbols, dimensions, subscript designations that are the same for two
letter symbols, reserve symbols,'unit different quantities, or use of SPE symbols that
abbreviations and units conflict with firmly established, commonly used
notations and signs from the fields of mathema-
Confusion often arises as to the proper distinctions
tics, physics, and chemistry.
between abbreviations, computer symbols, dimen-
To avoid conflicting designations in these
sions, letter symbols, reserve symbols, unit abbre-
cases, use of reserve symbols, reserve subscripts,
viations and units used in science and engineering.
The Society of Petroleum Engineers has adhered to and reserve symbol-reserve subscript combina-
the following descriptions: tions is permitted, but only in cases of symbols
conflict. Author preference for the reserve sym-
A. Abbreviations - (for use in textual matter, tables, bols and subscripts does not justify their use.
figures, and oral discussions) - an abbreviation is In making the choice as to which of two
a letter or group of letters that may be used in quantities should be given a reserve designation,
* Electrical charge is current times time, ISO uses: Mass (M), Length (L), Time (T), Temperature (8), Electric current (I), Amount of
substance (N) and Luminous intensity (J).
266 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
an attempt should be made to retain the standard (ISO) and many other national and international
SPE symbol for the quantity appearing more bodies concerned with standardization empha-
frequently in the paper; otherwise, the standard size the special character of these designations
SPE symbol should be retained for the more and rigidly prescribe the manner in which the
basic item (temperature, pressure, porosity, per- unit abbreviations shall be developed and
meability, etc.). treated.
Once a reserve designation for a quantity is G. Units - units express the system of measurement
employed, it must be used consistently through- used to quantify a specific physical quantity. In
out a paper. Use of an unsubscripted reserve SPE usage, units have 'abbreviations' but do not
symbol for a quantity requires use of the same have 'letter symbols'. Up to this time, SPE has
reserve symbol designation when subscripting is not standardized a general system of units, nor
required. Reversion to the standard SPE symbol units for individual quantities; it has signified
or subscript is not permitted within a paper. For willingness, however, to join in a future national
larger works, such as books, consistency within a effort to convert from the English to a metric
chapter or section must be maintained. system of units.
The symbol nomenclature, which is a required SPE's practices showing the above distinctions
part of each work, must contain each reserve are illustrated in the table of example quantities.
notation that is used together with its definition. Authors can materially aid themselves, editors,
F. Unit Abbreviations - a unit abbreviation is a and readers by keeping the distinctions in mind
letter or group of letters (for example, cm for when preparing papers for SPE review. Manu-
centimeter), or in a few cases a special sign, that scripts submitted to SPE are subject to review on
may be used in place of the name of a unit. The these aspects before being accepted for publica-
International Organization for Standardization tion.
Examples
Letter Reserve
Abbrev. symbol symbol
for text, for used only in Computer
tables, mathe- case of symbol Unit
figures, matical symbols for Dimen- abbrev.
Quantity oral use equations conflict programs sions and units'
gas-oil ratio, producing GaR R none GaR none cu ftlBBL
gas-oil ratiO, initial Rsi none GORSI none cu ftlBBL
solution, initial solution GaR
productivity index PI J j POX L4Vm bid/psi
productivity index, SPI Js js POXS L3 t1m b/d/psilft
specific
* Examples only; SPE has not standardized units.
r
h HPC constant, hyperbolic decline
q = qJ [ 1 + -j;
al
r
tdN TIMDN decay time, neutron (neutron mean life) t
h HPC decline constant, hyperbolic [from equation
[ + -j;
q = q;ll a·t
I
00
dt, x positive
x t
Ei (x) exponential integral, modified
'"" 0 [r.!...-t dl +
_00 E t
dl Jx positive
fg Fg MFRTV V_]
gas mole fraction [__
L+V
kglko KglKo PRMGO gas-oil permeability ratio
r
IH iH
h HPC hyperbolic decline constant (from equation)
-j;
q = q) [1 + a·t
g (z) script I imaginary part of complex number z
Z MPD impedance various
Za MPDA impedance, acoustic m/L2t
Ze ZE,lj MPDE impedance, electric mL2/tq2
I I --X index (use subscripts as needed)
If if,/F,i F FRX index, fracture
IFf iFf FFX index, free fluid
IH iH HYX index, hydrogen
I IJX index, injectivity L4 t/m
n JL RFX index of refraction
Icp icp PRX index, porosity
ICPI iCPI PRXPR index, primary porosity
I j PDX index, productivity L 4 t/m
IR iR RXSH index, (hydrocarbon) resistivity
R/Ro
Icp2 iCP2 PRXSE index, secondary porosity
IshGR ishGR SHXGR index, shaliness gamma-ray
(Ylog - Yen)/(Ysh - Yen)
Is is IJXS index, specific injectivity Ct/m
Is js PDXS index, specific productivity L3t/m
h d,e THK individual bed thickness L
Ge ge GASE influx (encroachment), cumulative, gas L3
Ne ne OILE influx (encroachment), cumulative, oil L3
We We WTRE influx (encroachment), cumulative, water L3
AGe Age DELGASE influx (encroachment) during an interval, gas L3
ANe Ane DELOILE influx (encroachment) during an interval, oil L3
AWe AWe DELWTRE influx (encroachment) during an interval, water L3
QLtD Q'tD script I ENCLTQQ influx function, fluid, linear aquifer,
dimensionless
QtD Q'tD script I ENCTQQ influx function, fluid, dimensionless
(at dimensionless time t D)
e ENC influx (encroachment) rate L3/t
eg ig ENCG influx (encroachment) rate, gas L3/t
eo io ENCO influx (encroachment) rate, oil L3/t
ew iw ENCW influx (encroachment) rate, water L3/t
GL gL NGLTI initial condensate liquids in place in reservoir L3
Ci INVI initial capital investment M
282 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
Jt
x
dt, x positive
Ei (x) integral, exponential, modified
lim
0 Jt
t
dt + · t
1
dt ,x positive
_00 E t
/q,sh <Pigfsh FIGSH intergranular space (porosity), fraction
occupied by all shales
/q,w <Pigfw FIGW intergranular space (porosity), fraction
occupied by water
/q,shd <Pimjshd FIMSHD intermatrix space (porosity), fraction
occupied by non-structural dispersed shale
<Pim !im,Eim PO RIM intermatrix 'porosity' (space)
(Vb - V ma)IVb
U Ei INE internal energy mele
Sog POWSog SATOG interstitial-oil saturation in gas cap
SPE NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS 283
J
00
0
y (t) e-stdt
abandonment a A A
acoustic a A, «alpha A
activation log, neutron NA na NA
active, activity, or acting a A
after taxes a A
air a A A
air-fuel aF AFU
altered a A
amplitude log A a A
angle, angular, or angular coordinate () theta THE
anhydrite anh AH
anisotropic ani ANI
annulus apparent (from log readings; an AN AN
use tool description subscripts)
apparent (general) a ap A
apparent wellbore (usually with wellbore radius) wa WA
areal A A
atmosphere, atmospheric a A A
average or mean pressure 2- PAY
average or mean saturation S s,p rho SAY
band or oil band b B B
bank or bank region b B
base b r, f3 beta B
before taxes b B B
bond log, cement CB cb CB
borehole televiewer log TV tv TV
bottom hole bh w,BH BH
bottom-hole, flowing (usually with pressure or time) wi WF
bottom-hole, static (usually with pressure or time) ws WS
boundary conditions, external e 0 E
breakthrough BT bt BT
bubble b B
bubble-point conditions, oil at (usually with ob OB
formation volume factor, Bob)
bubble-point conditions, solution at (usually sb SB
with gas-oil ratio, R sb )
bubble point (saturation) b s,bp B
bubble-point or saturation (usually with bp B
volume, V bp )
bulk (usually with volume Vb) b B,t B
burned in experimental tube run (usually bE BEX
with volume, V bE )
burned or burning b B B
burned portion of in situ combustion pattern, displacement Db DB
from (usually with efficiency, E Db)
burned portion of in situ combustion pattern, volumetric Vb VB
of (usually with efficiency, E vb )
burned reservoir rock Rb RB
SPE NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS 301
Chapter 2
Solution 2.1
Although this problem should place probabilistic ranges on the given data and assumptions, it will be calculated
deterministically.
We will assume that the combination of oil expelled from source rocks and trapped in potential structures represents
some 8% of the converted source rocks, i.e.:
Oil converted for source rock = 5 x 4500 x 12 x 106 m 3
Trapped oil ( = OIP) = 0.085 x 4500 x 12 x 106 m 3
= 2.16 x 1010 m3
Assuming an average formation volume factor of 1.4 rm 3/sm 3 this yields a stock tank oil in place of 1.54 x 1010 sm3 .
For an assumed overall technical recovery factor of 0.35 this yields a recoverable reserve of
1.54 x 1010 x 0.35 = 5.4 x 109 sm 3
(This is equivalent to 34 x 109 STB.)
(N.B. The UK Government's 1983 'Brown Book' indicates a probable range of technically recoverable reserves between
11 and 23 x 109 STB, assuming an oil formation volume factor of 1.4 rm 3 /sm 3 .)
Chapter 3
Solution 3.1
Casing Design Example
(a) The buoyancy factor (BF) is given by
SGsteel- SGfluid
BF=-----
SGsteel
For the external system:
7.84 - 1.92
BF = = 0.755
7.84
and for the internal fluid system:
7.84 - 1.15
BF = 7.84 = 0.853
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 311
The neutral point (NP) is thus the depth at which the string above is in tension and below in compression.
NP = 13000 x BF
= 13000 x 0.755
= 9820 ft
This is rounded off to 9800 ft.
:. Use 23 ppf casing from bottom to 11520 ft, that is (13000 - 11520) = 1480 ft
(NB no tension problem since neutral point is at 9800 ft.)
(ii) Burst check
Since a more dense mud is used outside the casing then the greatest internal:external pressure difference is at the top of
each section.
At 11 520 ft, internal differential is:
(max surface pressure) + (internal fluid head) - (external fluid head)
Internal pressure gradient = (SG x 0.433) = 1.15 x 0.433 = 0.498 psi/ft
:.8000 + 11520 [0.498 - 0.831] = 4164 psi
As burst pressure of 23 ppf casing is given as 11780 psi no problem arises.
(iii) Joint strength calculation check
Since the entire section is below the neutral point, tension is not a problem so an API joint with long threads is sufficient.
(iv) Design weight for the section (CWT)
CWT = Design length x wt per foot x BR
= 1480 x 23 x 0.885
= 301251bs.
(d) For the next section N-80, 23 ppf has the next highest collapse pressure to P-110, 20 ppf and can be set below the
neutral point (see Table A3.1).
8370
(i) Collapse limit = 0.831 = 10072 ft
This is above the neutral point and therefore subject to the weight of casing above.
We calculate the ratio (R) for unit tensile stress to minimum yield strength using the ellipse of biaxial yield stress curve
(Fig. A3.1) to obtain the percent offull collapse pressure that is appropriate. From Table A3.1 the plain end area (A) of
20 ppfN-80 is 5.828 in2 • For the minimum yield strength (Ym ) of 80000 psi we have:
weight in air of casing above neutral point
R= Y m .A
Assume casing above neutral point is 20 ppf
20 (9800 - D)
R = 80000 (5.828)
We have to choose D such that the reduction factor (FR ) correlated with R to obtain the effective collapse depth is
consistent:
. 6930 J 20 (9800 - D)}
I.e. 0.831 X FR = f(R) = f \80000 (5.828)
This is solved by trial and we might choose D to be 7900 ft
20 (9800 - 7900)
R = 80 000 (5.828) = 0.0815
From Fig. A3.1 the value of FR corresponding to 0.0815 is 0.956%
6930
Collapse limit is 0.956 x 0.831 = 7972 ft
We could converge a little better but might accept 7900 ft as a suitable depth, giving 2170 feet of casing required between
7900 and 10 070 ft.
(ii) Burst check for internal differential at 7900 ft
= 8000 + 7900 [0.498 - 0.831]
= 5369 psi
This is within the tolerance of both 20 and 23 ppf N-80
(iii) Joint strength check
Section design weight = (2170 x 20 x 885) = 38 409lb
Total design weight = 38 409 + 54 920
= 93 329lb
We can see that the joint strengths of 20 and 23 ppfN-80 casing are both greater than the design weights (Table A3.1):
23 ppf : 251 000 lb
20 ppf: 214000 lb
(f) In abnormal pressure wells, a depth can be reached where either collapse or burst may control. A design trial for the
next section is made using 17 ppf N -80.
5240
(i) Collapse check 0.831 = 6305 ft
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 313
05
g
go
-0
0;
.;;' 0.1
E
·c
·E
0.05
o
o
;;
·w'"
i
.'§ 0,02
'l;
o
c
a:
The depth that 17 ppf N-80 will withstand the internal pressure differential is below its allowable collapse depth and this
grade cannot be used in this part of the design. We must therefore consider using 20 ppf N-80 as we know that this is
collapse designed down to 7900 ft. The burst strength for this is 7400 psi.
8000 -7400
Depth = 0.831 _ 0.498 = 1802 ft, round up to 1820 ft
This means that we could design a section of length (7900 - 1800) = 6080 ft
(iii) Joint strength check
Design weight for section is (6080 x 20 x 0.885) = 107 616lb
Total weight is 107 616 + 93329
= 200 945lb
The joint strength for 20 ppf N-80 is given in Table A3.1 as 214000 lb. We have so far designed 11180 ft of the total well
depth of 13000 ft. The remaining 1820 ft are considered using P-110, 17 ppf grade casing.
314 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
It should be emphasized that this design is one of many combinations which may be acceptable and optimization in terms
of economics is possible.
Solution 3.2
The average gradients give a pore pressure at 13 000 ft of
13 000 x 0.455 = 5915 psi
and a fracture pressure at 13 000 ft of
13 000 x 0.80 = 10 400 psi
The minimum setting depth is given by equating, above 13 000 feet, the gas and fracture gradients to a common
pressure. If the distance above 13 000 ft is D' then
Pg = 5915 - (0.1 x D')
Plr = 10 400 - (0.8 X D')
Setting Pg = Plr we have
10400 - 5915
D' = = 6407ft
0.8 - 0.1
Minimum setting depth is 13 000 - 6407 = 6593 ft.
TABLE A3.1 Casing data for example (Grade NSO-L/PllO-L 5.5 in. OD.)
Weight Wall thickness Collapse incl. Burst strength Joint strength Section
(lblft) (in) safety factor into wk. press (incl. S.F.) lOOOlb area
(psi) (incl. S.F.) psi (in 2)
17.0 PlIO 0.304 7000 8500 247 4.962
17.0 N80 0.304 5240 6180 174 4.962
20.0 PlIO 0.361 9570 10 180 274 5.828
20.0N80 0.361 6930 7400 214 5.828
23.0 PlIO 0.415 11 630 11 780 322 6.630
23.0N80 0.415 8370 8570 251 6.630
141.5
API = SG - 131.5
SG API SG API
0.70 70.6 0.80 45.4
0.72 65.0 0.82 41.0
0.74 59.7 0.84 36.9
0.76 54.7 0.86 33.0
0.78 49.9 0.88 29.2
0.90 25.72
. _ m _ MP _ 18.38 x 14.7 _ -2 3
Gas denSIty - V - RT - 10.732 x 520 - 4.8 x 10 Ibft
(d) At 2000 psia and 595°R
595
Tpr = 371.5 = 1.60
2000
P pr = 670.6 = 2.98
;,r(
6.977
6.9 x vowvoL
= 6.9 x 10-3 5.615 = 1.235 BBLIMSCF
Ratio
1-11
= 1.3 (Fig. 4.9)
Therefore 1-1 = 0.015 cp
316 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
1 1 dz
(i) Compressibility cg = PI - 1 dz )
1
= Ppc
(Pp--;1 dP
pc dz )
pr
Therefore pressure of mud at this point will be = 1975.5 + 500 = 2475.5 psi
Solution 4.3
Solution 4.4
"'" " .
(a) From graphs (Fig. 4.21, 4.22) or correlation equations for
API = 38°; GOR = 750; T = 175°F; and Yg = 0.7: ""'¥7""b-=t---t-I---1--t--l
,OOO"----'-----'----'-_L-.-'-----'----'
= 2800 psia
Pp,:{ps;.) &00
bubble point pressure
formation volume factor = 1.4 RB/STB 1-"':::: ..."
'" ::::::--
specific gravity oftank oil =
141.5
131.5 + 38 = 0.834 300
"-
12 -.::::: ::-:::: f:::
weight of oil and gas in SOlution} 100 120 140 1SO t80 200 220 240
From specific gravity of tank oil, weight of one barrel of oil is 350.4 x 0.834 = 292.2 lb.
Avogadro's law states that lIb-mole of any ideal gas occupies 379.4 cu ft at 60°F and 14.7 psia.
:. weight of gas which will dissolve in 1 STB of tank oil is given by the number of moles of gas times its molecular weight.
The molecular weight of gas is the gas gravity x molecular weight of air
:. weight of gas/STB = (R,I379.4) x 0.7 x 28.971bs = 0.05345 Rslbs.
The reservoir oil gradient is therefore 0.677 x 0.433 psi/ft where 0.433 is the fresh water gradient
:. oil gradient = 0.293 psi/ft.
For an oil-water contact of 7000 ft SS the hydrostatic pressure is 7000 x 0.465 = 3255 psi.
The bubble point pressure is the pressure of oil saturated with gas in equilibrium at the gas-oil contact :. pressure at top
of oil column = 2800 psi.
8255 - 2800
For constant oil gradient, height of oil zone = 0.293 = 1550 ft
For a molecular weight of 180 and 38° API oil the liquid critical temperature is 12200R and the liquid critical pressure is
310 psia
(460 + 175) 4000
Tpr = 1220 = 0.52 and P pr = 310 = 12.9
The reduced compressibility from charts (Fig. A4.1) is given at this Tpn P pr condition as CR = 0.002.
0.002
Since CR = Co· Pc then Co = 310 = 6 x 10-6 psia- I
Bo = Bob (1 - Co!).P)
= 1.389 RB/STB
From graphs, viscosity of dead oil at reservoir conditions = 1.4 cP
From graph of system pressure vs. system volume the bubble point is estimated by inflexion at 2500 psi.
3500
(404-410) _1_ -6 '-1
= (4000 _ 2500) . 408 = 9.8
::l
Co X 10 pSI til 3000
0.
408 2500
B03000 psi a = 295 = 1.383 RB/STB If)
'"'
(f)
2000
410
Bo2500 psia = 295 = 1.390 RB/STB
400
26.275 System volume
Rs = 295 (10-3) = 89.06 v/v = 89.06 (5.615) = 500 SCF/STB
At 2000 psia
388 430
Bo = 295 = 1.315 RB/STB ; B t = 295 = 1.457 RB/STB
21
Rs = 295 X 10-3 X 5.615 = 400 SCF/STB
:. B t = Bo + (Rsi - Rs) Bg
. B t - Bo (1.457 - 1.315)(295) -3
.. Bg = (Rsi _ Rs) = (26.275 _ 21.0)103 = 7.94 x 10 v/v
ChapterS
Solution 5.1
Plot either on log: log scales, or log F: log <p on coordinate scales.
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 319
100 \
80
\,\
60 ,, Slope'
length Faxis -17.95
m = length </> axis =
40 \\ = -1.53
30 o
._,, , Intercept at '" =1
,0. a = 0.774
20 ,,
,
'0\
10 ,,
t
LL
8
6
0,\
'0
'\,
,,
4
,
3 \,
,,
,,
2
, \
\
\,
1 ,,
0.8 --a
0.6
0.5 '-------'--'---'--L.L--'-l0=-'.OO:-:1-----'----'---'---'----'---L--L..11,J.0
R/ = 11.84 Qm Ro = 1.29 Qm
11.84
then I = 1.29 = 9.18
Sw = [I1]0.5 = 0.330
If exp = 1.8 Sw = 0.292
Ifexp = 2.2 Sw = 0.365
320 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
Solution 5.2
(a)
Bul k density
grams/cc Porosity %
Correction
r-------T------
-0.5 0 +0.5
Fig.A5.2.1
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 321
Gamma ray Resistivity Conductivity
20 API units 120 Depth Ohms mlm Millimhos 1m
10 divisions lS"normol Induction conductivity
o 40" spacing
Radiation intensity
increases
o 4000 o
o 4000
Oil bose mud Induction resistivity 8000
Temp =226 0____ __19
0_____________ 1<2.0
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
\
" ... _--- .....
A
B ,,/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
C
2.0
Pr=1.0g/cc
2.2
Shale
Matrix
point
2.8
(b) For zone C, point plots close to clean sandstone line with cJ> = 0.25. Assuming C to be water bearing
Ro = FRw = 1/cJ>2 . {Rw}
Rw = cJ>2Ro = 0.262 X 0.215 = 0.0145 (taking R 1Ld as Ro)
(e) See Fig. A5.2.3 for shale point. Only level B shows a significant displacement from clean line. Graphically Vsh for
zone B = XB/XS = 1.25/4 = 0.31.
(f) Taking the minimum shale indication (from DIN) gives only B as shaly. Presumably there are radioactive minerals in
the sands (such as feldspar) so the GR overestimates shale content.
As above graphically for level B, Vsh = 0.31. The porosity is given by point Yon the clean sandstone line where BY
is parallel to the matrix shale line, i.e. cJ> = 0.14. The graphical construction is complicated by the curve on the
sandstone line. More rigorously convert density and neutron values to sandstone matrix cJ>D = 16.5, cJ>N = 24.2. cJ>NSH
= 32, cJ>DSH = 7.5, cJ> = cJ>N - V SH cJ>NSH, cJ> = cJ>D - VSH cJ>DSH
Solving the equations for unknown VSH
cJ>N - cJ>D 24.2 - 16.5
V SH = = = 0.31
cJ>NSH - cJ>DSH 32 - 7.5
Archie
Si)mandzoux(VSH ) . _ z
R - FR . Sw + R . Sw .. 0.35 - 1.352 Sw + 0. 341Sw
t w SH . .
Solvmg quadratIc + ve root only
:. Sw = 0.376
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 323
where
1 1 1
-=-
Rt 2.86 VRt V (1-VsHI2)
V SH = 0.341 ; VSH(l - VSH/2) = 0.372; = 0.390
RSH SH
1 1
FRw = Rw = 1.352 ; YFRw= 1.163
Thus the modified Simandoux and Indonesia equations give similar Sw's which are less than the Archie Sw. The shale
conductance in the basic Simandoux is already near to the measured conductance so the solution gives an unlikely
optimistic value for a shaly sand.
Solution 5.3
= -1 { -1 Sw 2 + BQvSw )
F Rw
'\ 1FRw
(see Archie solution, Sw = VIi; = 0.544)
Modified Simandoux model
2 VSH
Rt FRw Sw + RSH . Sw
Comparing with the Waxman Thomas equation
324 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
1.5 X 1.38
VSH = 14.79 = 0.140
i.e. it would take 14% shale with resistivity 1.5 ohm-m to get the same result as the Waxman Thomas equation
.. ! 2 VSH.. _ 0.0676 2 0.14
BaslcSlmandoux R t - FRw Sw + RSH , .. 0.2 - 0.1 Sw + 1.5
1 1[0.2 - 0.0933]
Sw = V 0.676 = 0.397
Solution 5.4
(a) Prove
From Darcy's law:
-kA JP
q=---
!.t Jx
Assuming Boyle's law:
3000ff
QscPo = qP and Po = 1 atm.
Hence:
-kA JP 1000 ft:-I______----'
Qsc = -
!.t
P-
Jx
kA p/- P12
orQsc =-; 2L
Qsc!.t2 L
(b) k = A(P12 - p/)
6.2 x 2 x 0.018 x 2.54
XX
=0.2D
127' - 1)
Solution 5.5
The problem requires correction of pressure so that the linear Darcy law can be used. In field units:
kAAP
q = 1.127 X lO-3 - ; BBLIdL
Assuming average water gradient of 0.45 psi/ft (0.433 x 1.038) and referring to a HWC datum of 5250 ft SS, static
pressure at the outcrop is:
PS2so = 0.45 x 5250 = 2362.5 psi
But pressure = 1450 psi at 5250
3 750 x 3000 x 65 (2362.5 - 1450)
Hence, q = 1.127 x lO- x 1 x 52 800 --\
_------- j Poutcrop
q = 2848.5 BBLId
---------- ----------
P HWC . : : : : / / / - / f Poutcrop at HWC datum
....."";------10 miles - - - - "
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 325
Solution 5.6
Using the equation:
Qsc 2 ilL (6.4/60) x 2 x 0.018 x 2.54
k = A(P I2 - pl)
3t 1.272 (760
(861)2 - 12)
Solution 5.7
Assume cross-sectional area A.
dh
q = -A dt where q is flow rate and h is current height measured from bottom of core plug.
Flow across core is:
-kA I1P
q=--
Il L
But I1P = datum correction pressure difference, so:
-kA pgh dh
q=--=-A-
Il L dt
so- J
L dh kPg'Jt
- = - dt
h
ho
ilL
0
-J
ho kpg'
or log., It = L t ho ho
so k = IlL
Il
(holh)] = ilL
(lOge -h2 - loge hI
pg' pg' I1 t
Note: pg' has to be in units such that pg' h = atm.
1 x 2 X 106 loge84 -loge 15.5
Hence k = 1.02 x 981 x 4500
=0.8D
Note: a plot of log.,h against t would be best.
Solution 5.8
50
Poil = 50 lb/fe = .144 psi/ft = 0.3472 psi/ft
= 94 psi
326 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
Solution 5.9
Q k dP
Darcy's equation A = - -; dx for non-compressible flow
llP
=k'A-
f..tL
where k' is the apparent permeability and A the total area.
Hencek'A = kiAI + k2A2 + ...
n
Lk;A;
Therefore k' =
LA;
I
q, = qi
=. - .
= q2 = q3 - ..
o D B B
Now PI - P4 = (PI - P2 ) + (P2 - P3 ) + (P3 - P4 ) ..•
L, L2
Using Darcy's law
L f..t LI f..t L2 f..t
qtAk' = qi Aki + q2 A ki + ...
Since flow rates, cross-sections and viscosities are equal in all beds
-
-
hi qi k,
1
ht
-
h2 q2 k2
h3 q3 k3 j
The only difference in the two systems is the manner of expressing the length over which the pressure drop occurs. All
these terms are the same in each case.
"[k·h·
Therefore k' = - - '-'
hI
For radial systems, wellbore = 6", and radius of effective drainage 2000' and bed 1 is adjacent to wellbore.
Linear flow - parallel, and radial flow - parallel, take data lengths as bed depths and bed lengths and radii to be equal.
Chapter 6
Solution 6.1
Pc
(h = )
(Pw - Po)/144
- Crest
200 -
-
-
-
-
-
.e
150 r-
l-
\\-+-\-----samPle location Sw =0.31
I-
a;
\0
> I- o
... I-
c
100 I-
-
CI)
CI)
>
0
-
.Q
c -
"-----0-0
1:
c> -
'CD
:I: 50-
OWC at 33 ft relative
I J I I I I I I J
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Sw (fraction)---
for25mD
and 0 = 0.13
Solution 6.3
For the laboratory data YkTcj>c = (150/0.22) 0.5
](sw) vs Sw relationship is calculated.
= 26.11 and using ](Sw) =
CJ cos
Vi
cj>
with CJ cos e = 72 dyne/cm the
1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2
o 0.363 1.451 2.176 2.901 3.445 4.862 4.968 5.984 8.341 36.27
](sw> CJcos e
At reservoir conditions PC(Sw)", =
v'kicj>
for CJ cos e = 26 and v'kTcj> = 44.72
Pc (Sw)", = 0.581] (Sw) and the reservoir condition Pc curve is therefore calculated as
1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2
o 0.211 0.843 1.264 1.685 2.00 2.823 2.886 3.451 4.846 21.07
0.211
Howe = - - = 2 ft above the FWL
0.104
4.85
H TIZ = 0-- = 46.5 ft above the FWL
.104
330 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
Chapter 7
Solution 7.1
From Darcy's law modified for effective permeability in horizontal linear flow
qo!-loL qw!-lw L
Ko (s) = A I1P and Kw (s) = A I1P
o w
Assuming zero capillary pressure (Pc = 0 = Po - Pw) so I1Po = I1P w = I1P, and using Darcy units of eels for rate and
atmospheres for I1P, then:
q!-l [(4) (9) (1000)]
Ke (md) = I1P n: (3.2)2 3600
15.0 1.0 o
19.8 0.452 0.017
25.1 0.30 0.025
32.1 0.20 0.049
41.0 0.12 0.075
54.9 0.05 0.156
68.1 o 0.249
1.0 0
0.9
0.8
0.7
t 0.6
0.5
II
OA
0.3
0
0.2
0.1
I I
0.8 10
sw-
Solution 7.2
For pressure maintenance, the oil rate in RB/D is
10 000 x 1.2765 = 12765 RB/D
The end points of the relative permeability curve are
K ro ' = 0.9 at Swi = 0.28
Krw ' = 0.7 at Sor = 0.35
The ratio Ilw is then calculated from the given end point mobility ratio of 2.778.
flo k rw ' flo flw krw' 0.7
Since M' = flw • k ro ' , then flo = M' k ro ' = 2.778 (0.9) = 0.28
The fractional flow curve can now be calculated for the horizontal reservoir:
1
fw = fk::
k }
1 + 0.28
l
0.28 0.30 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.60 0.65
o 0.082 0.295 0.708 0.931 0.984 1.00
A line tangential to the fractional flow curve from Sw = 0.28 gives the tangent at Swf = 0.4 (fw = 0.535) and the intercept
withfw = 1 at Sw = 0.505. The gradient of this tangent[dfwfdSwlswis 4.44.
From Buckley-Leverett theory the constant rate frontal advance of the 40% saturation front is:
q(t) (5.615) [df ]
Xflday = (A)(<I» dS w swf
The tangent of gradient 3.33 to the fractional flow curve at saturations greater than frontal occurs at Swe = 0.45
dfw
(from a plot of dS vs Sw)·
w
_ (1-0.71)_
Sw = 0.45 + 3.33 :. Sw = 0.537
The factor is thus:
S -S .
RF = W WI = 0.36
1- Swi
332 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
Solution 7.3
The critical injection rate for gas is given in field units of SCF/D as:
4.9 x 10-4 k k r / A (Yg - Yo) sin a:
q SCFID = Ilg Bg (M - 1)
where Bg is in units of RBISCF and a: is negative for updip injection.
Solution 7.4
1.0
O8 \
I Distribution after 0.5 yrs
t .
. :--1:."
0.6 \ I
i ./ Calculated frontal
iY position
i
0.4 i
i
0.2
i
j
---.l....-_!.-
I Initio I
distribution
From the given data the saturation is plotted as shown in Fig. A 7.2
ql = 9434 rbld Dip = 6° 110 = 1.51 cp
h = 100' k = 276 mD Ilw = 0.83 cp
w = 8000' <I> = 0.215
Ay = 0.04 A= 800 000 ft2
1.0
/ .....
I
0.9
0.8
0.7
•
t
/
0.6
-
0.5
0.4
•
/
0.3
0.2
0.1 /.
• ...,.. I I I I I
0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Sw
Therefore:
Fig. A7.3 Fractional flow curve.
Since there is no uniform saturation distribution initially a material balance solution is used:
2.5
2.0 t
1.5 ;-',
-(/)
1.0 -0
0.5
1.0
Sw
Fig. A7.4 Slopes of fractional flow curve.
The slope of the fractional flow curve as a function of saturation is plotted in Fig. A 7.4. Selecting saturations
At 0.5 years the saturation distribution is shown on Fig. A7.2 and is represented in 10' increments.
5.615 qt Llt )
( Note: <j>A = 56.22
Llx LLlx Swi Sw (0.5 yr) Llx (Sw - SWi) LLlX (Sw - SWi)
10 10 0.79 0.79 0 0
10 20 0.70 0.79 0.9 0.9
10 30 0.56 0.79 2.3 3.2
10 40 0.45 0.78 3.3 6.5
10 50 0.375 0.755 3.8 10.3
10 60 0.33 0.730 4.0 14.3
10 70 0.30 0.710 4.10 18.4
10 80 0.278 0.690 4.12 22.52
10 90 0.254 0.675 4.21 26.72
10 100 0.24 0.650 4.10 30.83
10 110 0.23 0.640 4.10 34.93
10 120 0.215 0.630 4.15 39.08
10 130 0.205 0.620 4.15 43.23
10 140 0.20 0.613 4.13 47.36
10 150 0.195 0.605 4.10 51.46
10 160 0.190 0.600 4.10 55.56
10 170 0.183 0.595 4.12 59.68
{ 56.22 - 55.56)
Interpolation :. X f = 160 + 10 59.68 _ 55.56 = 161.6 ft from owe
From Fig. A 7.2, at X f = 161.6 ft, Swf = 0.60
Solution 7.5
For the particular example the problem reduces to the following tabulation, numbering layers n, from n = 0 to n = N =
5, bottom to top. n 5
- _ 0.7n + 0.15 (5 - n) . -
Swn - 5
_ 0.5 k
,Krwn - _ _ _ , K ron - 0.9_
f. j . - _ 'hf'j
5 5
kj kj
5
where: L kj = 50 + 500 + 1500 + 2000 + 500 = 4550 mD.
1
n
f. k j
N
Lk·
n+l 1
5 5
n N
n L kj Lk· L kj Lkj krwn kron SWn
n+l 1 1 1
1
Solution 8.1
Using the relationship h + 139 = 164/sinh x the saturation vs height relation is calculated as follows:
Fig. A 8.1 shows the plot of water saturation and porosity as a function of depth. Fig. A. 8.2 shows the plot of isopach
value vs area contained within the contour. In the absence of a phinimeter to measure area use metric graph paper in a
simplified approach. Take 50 ft intervals from base to crest. Count squares to determine volume for each interval. Assign
appropriate value of <p and Sw for each interval (lcm square = 2500 acreft).
Porosity (cp)
0.20
320
280
-.-t...
240
-...
ti 200
c
c:
0
u
-Q)
160
c
Q)
> 120
-
0
.J:l
C
.s::
CI 80
·CP
::I:
40
0
Water saturation (Sw)
The distribution functions of the reservoir parameters are shown in Fig. A 8.3. These data are interrogated randomly
using a Monte Carlo approach in the recoverable reserve calculation. The resulting cumulative frequency greater than a
given value plot is shown in Fig. A 8.4. The values associated with the 90%, 50% and 10% levels are as follows:
at 90% the recoverable reserve is at least 72 x 106 STB
at 50% the recoverable reserve is at least 120 x 106 STB
at 10% the recoverable reserve is at least 185 x 106 STB
100
.-i hne!
100
, Area
t
a.
I-'l
•
0
• .,
0\
100 100
\
\ 0\
• cf>So RF
t t
a.
I-'l
50 0: 50
I-'l
•
•\
0
100 100
cf>
t
\0
\
a. 50 50
I-'l
• •
0 0
100
-0
.l!!
c
0 90
'ii
.E
c:
c 80
.,.....
C
70
c>
.!!!
., 60
=>
C 50
E:
£i
c
..c 40
.,a.
0
c>
c 30
.,
C
.,ea. 20
.,
C 10
:;
E
=>
u
20 260
10 6 STS----
Fig. A8.4 Recoverable reserves distribution.
Chapter 9
Kt Solution 9.1
to = <PJUr
with (a) to = 1481
(b) to = 14815
(c) to = 7.4 X 10-3
Solution 9.2
p;-p= [-+ 1
<PJUr
For (a) x = 4Kt = 4.2 x 10-3
as x is small
- E;(-x) = - 0.5772 -Jogex
= 4.895
Hence AP = 22.72 atmospheres
For (b) x = 0.4375 From graph - E; (-x) = 0.62
Hence AP = 64 atmospheres
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 339
Solution 9.3
From the plot shown in Fig. A 9.1, of P wi vs 10glOt
m = 18 psi/cycle
162.6 (500) (0.5) (1.7535)
ThenKh = 18
= 3960 mD ft
3960
KO=60=66mD
4940
m = 18 psi /cycle
4930
•
t
4920
."
•
Solution 9.4
f HAt) with the points in the table calculated, the slope is determined as
From a graph of P vs llog ---;;;:r
21. 7 psi/cycle ( = m).
For a reservoir rate q of 500 (1.454) rb/d (= 727 rb/d)
162.6q(..t
Then, kh = = 3800 mD.ft
m
t = 60 x 24 = 1440 hours
Solution 9.5
Examination of the data shows that: !!.P/day = 3 psi
Assuming 1 - Sw =0.7
We have NBoi = NpBo/(co).!!.P
and (co)e = 15 x 10-6/0.7 = 21.4 x 10-6
and Np = 500 bId. For Bo = Boi then
500 6
N = 21.4 X 10-6 x 3 = 7.8 x 10 BBL
Solution 9.6
Slope = 7 psi/cycle from Homer plot
Rate Q (MSCFID) (!!.p2) total 162.6 (q Bg) IA.
1 7290 42181 HenceKh = m
2 16737 126120
3 25724 237 162 0.00504zT
4 35522 391616 Bg = P BBLlscf = 0.00103·
Kh = 14 500 K= 72mD
Assume tflow prior to build up is 4.5 hours:
2 2_14241A.zTQ { )
NowPe -Pw - Kh InO.606re/rw +Sl
= 0.000185
Rate Q(MSCFID)
1 7290 9851 42181
2 16737 51928 126120
3 25724 122665 237162
4 35522 233906 391616
Comparison between the numbers shows that at high rates the inertial drop is over half the total drop, and that in this
case only the inertial drop is close to the total drop of the previous rate.
The AOF plot is shown in Fig. A 9.2 and when Ap2 is equal to Pe 2 (6.32X106psi2) then QAOF = 220 X 106 SCFld
AOF=
220mm SCF/D C B
-----------------e--------------------------------------------.
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o'" I
I
tA
I
Chapter 10
Solution 10.1
_ 2000 l520 _ 12
Vsc - 14.7 0.825595 - 15.6 x 10 SCF
(1) Assume no water influx,
- - -Pj = -Ps !1 V
Gas recovered !1n = -Vr (Pi
RTr Zi Za RTs
Recoverable gas measured at stan dar conditions
=Vr
-Ts
- (Pi
- - Pa)
-
TrPs Zi Za
500
At 500 psi, reduced pressure Ppr = 67 6 1. = 0.75 Z = 0.94
Vr TsPi Z, Pa)
Therefore recoverable gas =- T 1 - - -P
P
r s Zl Za I
= 15.6 X 10 12 (1 - 0.219)
Solution 10.2
2nkoh 2nk h !1Pg
Radial flow of oil q0 = --B- Radial flow of gas qg = =..:::£.::B
flo 0 flg g re
log -
e rw
and if the capillary pressure gradient is negligible, and the pressure drop over the same radii are considered,
_ kgfloBo
qo - ko flgBg
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 343
To this must be added the gas evolved from solution in the oil.
The total measured gas-oil ratio will then be:
kg flo Bo
+ Rs
ko flg Bg
For the figures given:
(96)(0.8)(1.363)
(1000)(0.018)(0.001162) + 500
= 5005 + 500
= 5505 SCF/STB
Solution 10.3
Since bubble-point is 1850 psi, this must be pressure at any gas-oil contact.
Elevation of gas-oil contact above oil-water contact is:
At 1600 psi:
B/ + BiRp - Rs;) = 1.437 + 0.00150(1100 - 690)
= 2.0520
m Boi 0.5 (1.363)
B/ - Boi + Bgi (Bg - Bg;) = 1.437 - 1.363 + 0.00124 (0.0015 - 0.00124)
= 0.0740 + 0.1429
= 0.2169
We = (2.052 X 3.1 X 108 + 31 X 106) - 2.198 X 109 X 0.2169
= 1.904 X 108 BBL
At 1300 psi:
B/ + Bg(Rp - R si) = 1.594 + 0.0019(1350 - 690)
= 2.8480
m Boi 0.5 (1.363)
B/ - Boi + Bgi (Bg - Bgi) = 1.594 - 1.363 + 0.00124 (0.0019 - 0.00124)
= 0.5937
From PVT data the values of B o, Rs and Bg at 4300 psi can be estimated by linear interpolation as:
Bo = 1.228 RBISTB; Rs = 338 SCF/STB; Bg = 7.545 X 10-4 RB/SCF
SPE NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS 345
From production data the value of Rp is calculated as GpfNp to give the following table.
Solution 10.6
The dimensionless radius ratio is:
r aquifer 81000
re = =--=9
D r oil zone 9000
The dimensionless time tD is related to real time by:
2.309 k t (years) 2.309 (707t)
tD = <l>ql, = (0.18)(7x 10-6) (0.4) (900W = 40t
The instantaneous pressure drops which at the start of each year are equivalent to the continuous pressure declines are:
Pi - PI 5870 - 5020 .
t!..Po = - - 2 - = 2 = 425 pSI
Pi - P2 5870 - 4310
t!..P I = - - - = = 780 psi
2 2
PI - P3 5020 - 3850
t!..Pz = --2-= 2 585 psi
40 21
80 29
120 34
346 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
j=n-I
From We = U L APWD (TD - (Dj)
j=O
Chapter 11
Solution 11.1
1 [0.00708 k kro h
PI=- 1
",,"0 In -re - 0.75 + S
rw
For re = 1500 ft
rw=0.5ft
S= +4
K ro = 0.6
h = 100ft
k= 1325mD
50
PI=-
!.to
Solution 11.2
The injectivity index is given in field units by:
0.00708 k k rw h
!'w In - 0.75+ s]
Assuming all other factors equal then
Solution 11.3
Use is made of the plot in Fig. 11.4 which correlates areal sweep efficiency E A as a function of end point mobility ration
(M') for different fractional injection volumes, VD.
Kw' !.to 0.4 3.4
M'=-·- =--·-=4
!.tw Ko' 0.4 0.85
The volume of injected fluid, in reservoir barrels, after 10 years is:
10 X 365.25 X 53 000 x 1.005
= 1.945 x 108 RB
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 347
The displaceable pore volume (= PV (I-SoT - Swi» is given in reservoir barrels as follows:
= 1.946 x lOS RB
1.945 X 108
V D = 1.946 X 108 - 1
From Fig. 11.4 the value of EA corresponding to M' = 4 and VD = 1 is 0.7
Solution 11.4
For stable cone formation
= g' X (Pw - Po)
For (in psi), and cone height X (in feet) and density difference as specific gravities then
62.4
= 144 (1.01 - 0.81) 50
= 4.33 psi
Chapter 12
Solution 12.1
(a) In field units
1.25 (4000)
U= 70(1500)
0.0476 BID - ft3
(a) (b)
Solvent
Oil
Oil
For a mobility ratio, M represented by !1ot'1ls (= 25), Figure A 12.2 shows a breakthrough sweep efficiency of about 15%
and a flow dominated by gravity tonguing. (Fig A 12.1)
100
>-
u
c:
Q)
·u
:::
-; 60
Q)
t-Regionill-i------Region N
0
0-
Q)
Q)
til M=6.5
.£:
CI>
:::J
e
.£:
0
M =27 Region N
E I-----Regionll---·I....• -----Region ill----------<-t-''-i
co
10 100 1000 10000
. . . .. 2050UJ-L L (B/O-FT 2 )(CP)(FT)
Viscous-gravity force ratiO (R V- G)' field units, _ 0 , '----,3:;--'-'----'--'----'
At kh (G/cm )(md) (FT)
Solution 12.2
The tie lines for the system join the equilibrium compositions of systems A and B in the two phase region. The
compositions are plotted in Figure A12.3
(a) The critical point (CP) is estimated where the limiting tie line becomes tangential to the phase envelope and has the
composition, wt%, 21 % surfactant, 67% oil; 12% brine.
(b) The point with the composition 4% surfactant and 77% oil is given on Figure A12.3 as point A. From the slope of tie
lines in this region the equilibrium phase compositions are AI and A2 with weight percents estimated as:
AI 10% oil; 10% surfactant; 80% brine
A2 97% oil; 2% surfactant; 1% brine
For an original 200 g mixture containing
8g surfactant, 154 g oil, 38 g brine
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 349
100% Surfactant
Wt%
\ Wt%
Brine Surfactant
(c) On Figure A 12.3 the composition 20% oil and 80% brine is shown at location B. A line from B to the 100%
surfactant point leaves the two phase region at location B', having a composition oil 16.5%, surfactant 17.5%, brine
66%. The oil + brine weight is 100 g and would constitute 82.5% of the mixture, so surfactant needed is 0.175
(100/0.825) = 21.2 g.
(d) On Figure A 12.3, location 1 is 10% oil, 40% surfactant and location 2 is 50% oil, 40% surfactant. They are in a
single phase region and the resulting mixture contains 30% oil, 40% surfactant and 30% brine, as denoted by
position 3.
(e) On Figure A 12.3, location 4 is 12% surfactant, 5% oil and location 5 is 20% surfactant, 77% oil.
The mixture weight is 200 g and contains 41 % oil, 16% surfactant, and 43% brine. It is shown as location 6. The
mixture is in the two phase region and equilibriates to compositions C and D on the equilibrium tie line through
location 6. The compositions are:
C: 58% brine; 21.5% oil, 20.5% surfactant (146 g total)
D: 94% oil; 5% surfactant; 1% brine (54 g total)
350 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
Solution 12.3
For conventional production
208.71AO. S
tJ.o In I - 0.964
tQi = Wi [ Cw fsdhLYdh
]
The ratio of latent heat to total energy injected, fhv is calculated from:
_ { Cw )"1 _{ (1.02 (380 - 100) )"1
fhv - 1 + fsdb LVdb - 1+ 0.75 (845)
= 0.689
Figure A 12.4 can now be used to estimate the thermal efficiency of the steam zone, Ehs , at different values of
The values of to are given from:
to = 4t MR h2
45]2 [0.75]
= 4t [ 35 (60?
= 0.00138t days or 0.504 t years
The following table may now be constructed usingfhv = 0.689 on Fig A 12.4.
t (yr) t(days) to
1.0 365.25 0.5 0.64 233.8
1.5 547.9 0.75 0.59 323.3
2.0 730.5 1.0 0.56 409.1
2.5 913.1 1.25 0.52 474.8
1.0
W
.
.c:.
oJ
c::
0
N
E
c
2If)
0.6 fhv (ratio latent heat to
A
15 total energy injected) =
>-
()
c:: 1.O
-
Q)
.<3 0.50
;;:: 0.4 0.33
Q) 0.23
c 0.167
0.091
E
Q)
.c:: 0.2
I-
0
0.01 0.1 100
Dimensionless time, tD
For the case of 50% steam volume in the pattern of area A acres then
_
Qi - 0.5Ah
(43560 MR
E
AT)
hs
where t is in days
357817.5
That is
The injection rates needed to provide 50% pattern volume of steam at the following times are therefore as shown in the
following table.
t (yr) qinj(rblD)
1.0 1531
1.5 1107
2.0 875
2.5 753
These data may be further evaluated in terms of steam injection equipment capacity and project economics.
Solution 12.4
The wet condensate gas volume is obtained from the volumetric calculation:
Ah n </> (,5)
V = g
sc B .
g.
Vsc =
1
s.
[It(3 x 5280? 300 (0.18) (0.75)]
gl
352 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
3.1937 X 1010
Vsc = B
g;
SCF
In order to find Bg; we need the super compressibility factor z which can be obtained from Fig 4.7 using the reservoir
condition molecular weight or gas gravity.
The weight associated with a stock tank barrel of liquid is given by:
W = (5.615 x 62.4 = 0.75) 5000 (0.58) (28.97)
+ 379.4
= 262.78 + 221.44
= 484.22
The number of moles associated with this weight is
5000 (62.4) (0.75) (5.615)
n = 379.4 + 119
n = 13.18 + 2.21
n = 15.39
W 484.22
:. MW(res) = -;;= 15.39 = 31.46
MW(res) 31.46
and Yg(res) = 28.97 = 28.97 = 1.086
i.e. Yg(res) = 1.09
From Fig 4.7, P pc = 620 and Tpc = 465
From reservoir datum conditions
4500 670
P pr = 620 = 726 and Tpr = 465 = 1.44
The dry gas volume
So, from Fig 4.7 z = 0.925
G -- [ 8.197 x 10 12] [5000/379.4]
15.39
Then:
(0.02829) (0.925) (670) G = (8.197 x J(p) (0.8563)
B g;= 4500 G = 7.019 X 10 12 SCF
= 3.8962 x
10-3 RCF/SCF
Similarly the oil volume
3.1937 x 1010
Vsc 8.197 x 10 12
Vsc = 3.8962 X 10-3
NX R = 5000
= 8.197 X 1012 SCF
N = 1.639 X 109 STB
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 353
Chapter 13
Solution 13.1
Using the relationship that the depth equivalent of the total head is equal to the sum of the depth equivalents of the well
head pressure and the well depth, then:
DT = D whp + Dwell
(a) From Fig. A 13.1 at a well head pressure of 400 psi then DwhQ = 3700 ft. Since Dwell = 6000ft then DT = 9700 ft. At
the GOR of 200 scf/stb the pressure at a depth equivalent of Y700 ft is read as 2400 psi.
(b) From Fig. A 13.2 at the bottom hole pressure of 1200 psi and GOR of 500 scflstb the depth equivalent Dr. is read as
8900 ft. Since Dwell is 5000 ft then Dwhp is 3900 ft. The well head pressure is read from the graph at 3900 ft as 360 psi.
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
Solution 13.2
The maximum production rate qrnax can be evaluated using the Vogel relationship, withp, the static pressure, i.e.
H.2 08
1 - 0.2 ] - 08 [= r
= 0.619
3315
therefore, qrnax = 0.619 = 5355 bid
354 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
0
4 Q;
0 4
$2 0
.S; 5 0
.t:: $2 5
"6>
c .S;
Q)
...J 6 .t::
"6>
c 6
Q)
...J
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
Fig. A13.3
Fig. A13.4
10
Fig.A13.5
SOLUTIONS TO EXAMPLES 355
From Fig. A 13.1 to A 13.5 the different vertical flowing pressure gradient curves at different rates are found for 4 in.
tubing and a GOR of 200 SCF/STB. The total head depth is obtained as the sum of the well depth and the depth
equivalent to a tubing head pressure of 400 psig. The flowing bottom hole pressure equivalent to the total head depth is
recorded as a function of flow rate. It can be seen that the bottom hole pressure is essentially independent of rate at this
condition and is 2200 PSi[. (2200 ) (2200 )2]
Hence q = qmax 1 - 0.2 2600 - 0.8 2600
= 1400 bid
Solution 13.3
For a residence time of 3 min. the volume of oil in the separator will be:
(1000) (3) 3
Vo = (24) (60) = 2.083 m
At 40°C and 20 bar the volumetric rate of associated gas will be
V (1000) (95) (313.15) (1) 3
--II. = (24) (60) (60) (273.15) (20) = 0.06303 m Is
:. D = 1.209m
and L = 3.627 m
Design length for LID = 4 gives
D3 = (4.166)(4)
4n
:. D = 1.099
and L = 4.396 m
In practice the separator design would be based on a standard size selected to be nearest the size calculated.
Index
357
358 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
mercury injection and porosimetry 73,96,97 oil saturation, local, influences on 191
meters 229 oil viscosity 56
microemulsion 198 oil-water contact (OWC) 96, 98-9
middle (late transient) time solution 139 oil-water systems and relative permeability 102-3
miscible displacement mechanisms 194-5 open-hole tests 145
miscible displacement processes 193 optimal salinity 198
miscible floods 194 orifice meters 229
applications 195-6 overpressure 11, 12
examples 196
miscible fluids, properties of 195 Packer 146
mobility ratio 104-5, 107, 175,176 Peng and Robinson equation 44
and polymers 197 permeabilities, averaging of 83
modelling of reservoirs 130-1 permeability 7, 78-86
models 233--4 and critical displacement ratio 112
mole (def.) 44 anistropy 82-3
Monte Carlo distributions 83--4
approach, probabilistic estimation 127 improvement 193--4
technique and recoverable reserves estimate 130 laboratory determination of 81-2
movable hydrocarbon formula (MHV) 130 ratios 104-5
mud cake 36 variation, effects of 106-8
mud circulation system 22, 23 permeameter 81
mud composition, general limitations on 67 petroleum
mud logging 30-1 migration of 9-10
mud systems, bland (unreactive) and core recovery 31-2,67 origin and formation of 7
multicomponent systems, phase behaviour 41 recovery 5
multimodal porosity 78 petroleum engineering
multirate data, analysis of 144-5 function of 1
multiphase flow, equations of 234-5 problem solving in 3
phase (def.) 14
Natural gas phase inversion temperature (PIT) 198
calorific value 226 physical models 233
dehydration 224-5 piston displacement, stratified reservoirs 107-8
onshore processing 225-6 planimeter 124, 127
sales specification 224 polyacrylamides 197
sweetening 225 polymer fluids 193
natural gas processing 224-6 polymer systems and adsorption 197
nitrogen in miscible displacement 195, 196 pool see reservoir
non-wetting phase fluid 94 pore fluid pressures 11
non-wetting phase saturation 102 pore pressure, significance in drilling and well completion 26, 28
North Sea, heavy oil reservoirs 202 pore size distribution 96-7
North Sea, hydrocarbon fields pore space characteristics and equilibrium saturation distribution
Beryl field 196 92-3
Brent field 196 pore volume compressibility 160
Buchan field 37 of reservoir rocks 203
Dunlin field 131,178 poro-perm data, validity of 242
Forties field 249 porosity 7, 71-8
Fulmar field 249-51 and permeability, relationship between 84-6
Magnus field 184 cut-off 124
Maureen field 187 distributions 77-8
Montrose reservoir (RFf data) 151 logs 75-7
Murchison field 125 main logging tools for 75
Rough gas field 123, 124, 126, 127 measurement of 72-3
Statfjord field 196, 245, 246 potential gradient 174
Thistle oil reservoir 122, 123, 125 pressure (abnormal) and d-exponent 25-6
North Sea, oil correlations, recent 56-8 pressure build-up analysis 139-40
North Sea, reservoirs, fluid choice for miscible displacement pressure build-up (testing) 149
196 pressure control and well kicks 34-5
North Sea, reservoirs and surfactants 198, 199 pressure decline, rates of 137
pressure depletion 210
ODT (oil down to) 13 pressure drawdown and reservoir limit testing 142-3
offshore production/injection system, pressure equilibrium, static system 12
principle components of 184,185,186 pressure gauges 137, 147
offshore system 21 (downhole), characteristics of 136
oil bank formation 195 pressure gradients and heterogeneity of reservoir pore space 129
oil density 14 pressure maintenance 173
oil flow rate, measurement of 150 pressure regimes, abnormal 11-12
oil formation factor Bn 51 primary recovery, oil reservoirs 159-64
INDEX 361
probabilistic estimation 127-8, 129, 130 reservoir rocks, characteristics of 62-86
produced fluids and offshore processing 184-{5 pore volume compressibility 203
produced water treatment 228 reservoir simulation modelling 233-7
producing rates (well inflow equations/pressure loss calculations) reservoir simulation and vertical communication 243, 245
174-5 reservoir temperatures 13
production costs, significance of 1, 3 reservoirs 7-18
production engineering, and well performance 220-1 areal extent of 122-4
production engineering described 218 residual oil 53, 191
production operations, influencing factors 218-29 influence of recovery mechanism 191, 193
production rate effects 180-2 residual oil saturation 192
production rates, technical and economic factors 219 average 174
production system 218-19 and material balance 174
production testing 150-1 measurement of 191, 192
productivity index (PI) 245 residual saturations 111-112
and inflow performance 220 resistivity factor see formation resistivity factor
pseudo-critical temperatures and pressures 45-7 resistivity index 74
pseudo-relative permeability in dynamic systems 115 retrograde condensation 208
pseudo-relative permeability functions 177,178, 243,245 reverse circulating sub 146
static 115-16 rotary table 23
pseudo-relative permeability
relationships and thicker sands 107
PVT analysis 52-4 Safety joints and jars 147
PVTrelationships, single and multicomponent systems 40-1 salinity and water viscosity 56
samplers 147
Radial equations in practical units 136 sand body continuity 180
radial flow in a simple system 134-5, 137 importance of 238,239-40
recombination sampling 52 sand body type
recovery efficiency, water reservoirs 168 effect on injected water and oil displacement 178-80
recovery factors and reserves 128-30 recognition of 238
recovery string 34 saturation distributions in reservoir intervals 98-9
recovery targets 191 saturation gradients 164
Redlich-Kwong equation 44 saturation pressure see bubble-point pressure
relative permeability 102-4,106-7 scribe shoe 66
effect of temperature 204 sea water as injection water 184
relative permeability seawater floods (continuous) and low surfactant concentration
data, laboratory determination of 109-11 199-200
from correlations 112-13 secondary recovery and pressure maintenance 173-86
improvement, heavy oil reservoirs 204 secondary recovery techniques 173
relative spreading concept 93 sedimentary basins
repeat formation tester (RFf) 148-50 and hydrocarbon accumulation 7
reservoir behaviour in production engineering 220-1 origin of7
reservoir condition worldwide 2
material balance techniques 160 segregated displacement 177
volumetric balance techniques 160-1 sensitivity studies 246-7
reservoir data, sources 14-15, 17 shaliness, effect of 13
reservoir (def.) 7 Shinoda diagrams 198
reservoir description in modelling 237-45 simulators
uncertainty in 245-7 applications 235
reservoir development, costs of3, 4 classification of 235,236
reservoir dip angle 175,177 single component systems, phase behaviour 40-1
reservoir flow rate, effect of 181 skin effect 140-2
reservoir fluid properties, negative factors 142
measurement and prediction of 43-9 skin zone 194
reservoir fluids slabbing 68
and compressibility 42-3 solution gas drive, analysis by material balance 159-63
nature of 14 solution gas-oil ratio 53, 54, 55
properties of 40-58 Standing-Katz correlations 46, 47
reservoir geometry and continuity 180, 238-45 Standing'S data (bubble-point correlation) 55
reservoir heterogeneity 177-80 STB (stock tank barrel) 14
reservoir mapping and cross-section interpretation 245-6, 247 steady state permeability tests 110
reservoir modelling steam flooding 205
analysis and data requirements 237 steam properties 206, 207
application in field development 248-51 steamdrive analysis, example data requirements 207
concepts in 233-48 Stiles technique 107-8
reservoir performance analysis 157-68 stock tank oil 54
reservoir pore volume and change in fluid pressure 42-3 and retrograde condensation 208
reservoir pressures 10-12 stock tank oil in place and equity
362 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE